And, sadly, the people who wrecked our economy are now in power.

Barrack Obama, doing the destroying of America that Americans wont do want to…

doriangrey on May 29, 2009 at 8:17 AM

They asked for it, they got it!!!

///tinfoil

Now if he had said “piles” then he would have been correct. Piles are columns sunk into the ground to support foundations. However, you need lots of piles to support a foundation. Two aren’t going to accomplish the task.

The image I have is little Barack playing Jenga as a boy. He keeps pulling the blocks out at the bottom seeing how far he can go before the whole thing topples. Now he is doing the same thing with our country.

Obama Franks Waters, LLC, destroyers of the nation’s economy.

where we no longer rely on excessive debt and reckless risk – but instead on skilled workers and sound investments to lead the world in the industries of the 21st century.

Never mind whether pillars are above or below the foundation–the real Obamateurism is his actual reliance on excessive debt and reckless risk with OUR money!

If my outright calling Obama the Anti-Christ referred to in the Book of Revelations doesnt then your wiffile of a strike suggesting a connection between Obama and Islam sure as he11 aint gonna….

doriangrey on May 29, 2009 at 8:50 AM

Um, there’s no “s” in Revelation, and where exactly do you find the word “anti-Christ” in that book?

Pillar
c.1225, from O.Fr. piler, from M.L. pilare, from L. pila “pillar, stone barrier.” Fig. sense of “prop or support of an institution or community” is first recorded c.1325.

It might be related to

Pile
“heavy pointed beam,” from O.E. pil “stake,” also “arrow,” from L. pilum heavy javelin of the Roman foot soldier, lit. “pestle” (source of O.N. pila, Ger. Pfeil “arrow”). Pile-driver in the fig. sense of “very strong hit” is recorded from 1958.

St. Paul wrote to St. Timothy, in 1 Timothy 3:15,
“…the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth,” showing that pillars can be understood as supporting something.

So, is a retraction in order?

Indeed. This statement created an image of an unfinished structure. Like something that is abandoned and unfinished. With weeds growing around it…

keebs on May 29, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Indeed.

The libs never do actually finish anything or solve any actual problems they agitate about, even when they have the power to do so.

It’s as if they don’t actually WANT to solve anything so that their “solution” continues to gobble more money and power.

Since Obama’s dreams of clean energy and health care reform are pie in the sky, it would make sense that he is building castles in the air.
pearson on May 29, 2009 at 8:21 AM

Indeed. This statement created an image of an unfinished structure. Like something that is abandoned and unfinished. With weeds growing around it…