Tancredo: Sotomayor’s a member of the “Latino KKK”
posted at 10:09 pm on May 28, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The “Latino KKK” in this case meaning the National Council of La Raza, about which the boss has written eloquently and at great length. Three things here. First, I’ve fed Olby enough crap sandwiches over the years for comparing conservative pundits and Fox News to jihadis not to let Tanc get away with the equivalent. Unless they’re making bombs, it’s always poor form to compare your opponents to terrorists. Second, he’s simply wrong on the facts. As HuffPo notes, it’s not La Raza whose motto is “All for the race. Nothing for the rest,” it’s MEChA (“For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”). There are links between the two groups — this 2006 Human Events piece by Charlie Norwood is essential — but La Raza’s considerably more mainstream than MEChA, which calls for the reclamation of the American southwest by Latinos. Third, I realize that any concession to electoral reality is disdained by “true conservatives” as the hallmark of a squishy RINO, but with Republicans nervous about alienating Hispanic voters by confronting Sotomayor, how wise is it for the most vociferous amnesty opponent in America to be doing the rounds on cable news throwing verbal grenades like this? You worked hard in Congress for a long time, Tanc. Take a break. Especially now that the GOP’s got a tiny bit of traction in making Democrats squirm over her “wise Latina” comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
By whom? Not by me. You’re one of my favorite commentators here but if you’d rather hide under the porch with AP, that’s your prerogative, but if you feel we’re trying to edge you out of the tent, it might help if you’d explain how: is it because we have a tactical disagreement? In what fashion does that expel you from the proverbial tent rather than me, considering that the current Republican party has also been hiding under the porch without any sign of crawling out and helping in the fight?
FloatingRock on May 29, 2009 at 1:41 AM
Reminds me of something Pelosi said. What was it? Something about not having time to respond to waterboarding because she was too focused on winning an election? Yeah, that’s the kind of value-rich party we want to be.
Ronnie on May 29, 2009 at 1:42 AM
Second verse, same as the first.
Chicken Little: Listen to me, everybody! I’m your new leader! I’m gonna save your lives! I’m gonna tell you what to do!
MB4 on May 29, 2009 at 1:42 AM
Yes, I can’t help but notice that, what with crushing losses to liberals/socialists in two straight elections now, an increasingly rabid and disjointed base, and no leadership in sight. You hit the nail right on the head, Ronnie.
And on that depressing note, good night.
aero on May 29, 2009 at 1:44 AM
Sweet dreams, Nancy.
Ronnie on May 29, 2009 at 1:45 AM
I believe your arrogance in thinking that you are the only ‘voice of reason’ here is what is at issue here.
We all have our own ideas. We do not get our talking points from a single source. We are able to make our own decisions and fight our own battles.
Your voice alone is not the ‘voice of reason’. It is the little voice that is saying ’surrender surrender surrender’ over and over again.
HornetSting on May 29, 2009 at 1:45 AM
You seem to have completely missed the characteristic of yours that I was comparing to them, even though I made it clear in the same comment.
MB4 on May 29, 2009 at 1:45 AM
I’m deeply impressed…
2Brave2Bscared on May 29, 2009 at 1:46 AM
Agreed.
But you’re still wrong on this one. :P
:)
FloatingRock on May 29, 2009 at 1:47 AM
If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn’t thinking.
- George Patton
MB4 on May 29, 2009 at 1:53 AM
I’ll back you up on that. I learned of Palin from you, though I’m still neutral about her.
FloatingRock on May 29, 2009 at 1:53 AM
Sotomanure to the highest court, parley-voo?
Sotomanure to the highest court, parley-voo?
She has a foul temper and spews such a racist crock
And her face would stop a cuckoo clock
Hinky, dinky, parley-voo
InkyBinkyBarleyBoo on May 29, 2009 at 1:57 AM
You are wrong when you say its a choice between hysteria and rational explanation. we need both. The left is a master at creating hysteria and the right needs to learn it too. Yeah, for every Tanc, we have a Rubio who can explain facts clearly. As I’ve said, it’s not a choice. A successful movement needs both kinds of messaging.
promachus on May 29, 2009 at 2:14 AM
You do know what “LA RAZA” means?
Johan Klaus on May 29, 2009 at 2:19 AM
Right to Bearing Arms is not to be enforced on states, but abortion must be enforced to be kept legal?
Her crazy logic
PrezHussein on May 29, 2009 at 2:51 AM
OK…….
…… Let La Raza stand in line.
Seven Percent Solution on May 29, 2009 at 3:09 AM
From my link above………..
Nice………
………… look what I found,
Seven Percent Solution on May 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM
This was a stupid thing to say. Tancredo could have made his point without mentioning the KKK. Sometimes I think there are people out there who want to lose. Losing does not require governing. It just requires being bitter and pissy.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:31 AM
Inky:
Yeah, that is funny. hardy har har. I did not vote for Obama because I knew he would pick people for the court that I did not like, but Santomanure??? That is just another example of dumb.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:33 AM
Floating Rock:
Tactical? This kind of remark creates sympathy for the target and disdain for the idiot who said it. It does not help the cause, it hurts it. It is also not true. The KKK lynched people, burned them out of their homes, accused the Pope of trying to take over America, supported anti Semites and in general were violent, scary and cruel. I don’t like this pick all that much but there is no evidence of her ever lynching anyone.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:39 AM
Ok So Tancredo tells the truth and AP condemns him for it. That funny. It is not hateful to call an orange and orange.
She’s a RACIST BIGOT and a GENDER BIGOT. Ignoring the facts to appease Hispanics is wrong.
dogsoldier on May 29, 2009 at 6:45 AM
LaRaza plans to take back several US states. How do you think they plan to do that? Have a bake sale?
dogsoldier on May 29, 2009 at 6:46 AM
DEOMOCRATS BELONG TO FRINGE GROUPS? WHY ITS REQUIRED ISNT IT DIDNT A SENATOR BELONG TO THE KKK?
rone5847 on May 29, 2009 at 6:47 AM
Yeah Senator Byrd. Seriously though, go look at some of teh stuff the LaRaza members are saying and planning. It will make you blanch.
dogsoldier on May 29, 2009 at 6:49 AM
Tom Tancredo American Patriot…
jerrytbg on May 29, 2009 at 6:52 AM
dogsoldier:
I don’t think every member of La Raza is planning any such thing. But the truth is saying this woman is a member of the KKK or a group like it is stupid. Just plain self destructive and stupid and making excuses for it will not change that. It is the kind of idiot remark that gets conservatives hammered in elections while morons like Obama win. If Tancredo wants to go after her affiliation with La Raza, then he can do that without yammering about the KKK. Who has she lynched?
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:55 AM
It’s going to be a long time (weeks) before her hearings. In the mean time – we simply have surrogates put a constant “drip, drip, drip” on this woman in the news media and blogosphere.
Considering her racist statements, membership in essentially a racist organization (whether considered by today’s standards as “main stream” or not) … along with her anti-gun rulings …
This may be easier than we thought.
HondaV65 on May 29, 2009 at 6:58 AM
rone:
And Republicans had a presidential candidate, namely Ron Paul who was a truther and a loon. And he lost. Now, if Republicans want to go after these associations, I think they can do it in a way that is not quite so obnoxious.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:59 AM
Honda:
This remark will help her.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 6:59 AM
Not very many current members of the KKK have lynched anyone. Point is – the KKK is a White Supremacist group. La Raza is a Hispanic Supremacist Group.
Would you be happier if Tancredo had compared her to the skinheads? Or … what about the League of the South? They are Neo-Confederates who have a non-violent philosophy but they are listed by the SPLC as a “hate group”.
Do you think it would be acceptable for someone to belong to a White Supremacist group and be on the Supreme Court? If not – then why do you support her when she’s a member of La Raza – which freely and unapologetically associates with militant Hispanic Superiority groups?
That’s the point TanK was trying to make – maybe he should have picked another group.
Amazing to me how people crucify Tank for picking one wrong word in a statement but they completely give Soto a pass on her completely racist statement.
Amazing to me how Trent Lott LOST his Senate Leadership role for simply saying something nice at Strom Thurmond’s birthday party – but they give Soto a pass.
It’s double standard – I don’t play that.
HondaV65 on May 29, 2009 at 7:03 AM
You could say that about any group. It is meaningless. The fact is that the orientation of the group, La Raza, itself, is unadulterated racism (or ethnicism, if you want to be technical) and is anti-American, to say the least.
Why? You don’t seem to understand what La Raza is about, so why would others? They need to be educated about what La Raza really is – an organization just like the KKK, though La Raza adds the twist of hating America.
Incorrect.
LOL. Conservatives get hammered when they act like cowards and shy away from the truth, for fear of offending someone. No one respects milquetoasts like that – and they shouldn’t.
Oh please. Guess what, people supported by La Raza kill Americans all the time and La Raza fights to keep them roaming our streets, even when they have no legal right to even be in this country. If you want to look at violence, La Raza supports violent people right now and a hell of a lot more than the KKK ever did.
progressoverpeace on May 29, 2009 at 7:05 AM
progressoverpeace:
If that is the case, then ask about it in the questioning. But if you are going to accuse this woman and every other member of being a part of the KKK or a group like it, be prepared to back it up. After all that sort of thing is a crime.
I am just saying there are better ways to get a point across.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 7:08 AM
Illegal aliens, mostly Latinos, are raping and killing our children on a nearly daily basis…. Sounds like a fair comparison to me…
Monitor this site and you will see…
jerrytbg on May 29, 2009 at 7:09 AM
Honda:
When Tancredo brought up the image of the KKK, he did it for that purpose, to create the image of violence and hate. That was the whole purpose. If he did not want people to think about lynching, he would have come up with something else.
It was a dumbass thing to say.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 7:11 AM
Directly and truthfully is almost always the best way. Tancredo took that path. Others should follow.
progressoverpeace on May 29, 2009 at 7:11 AM
jerrytbg:
You see this is my point. This woman has not raped or killed anyone.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 7:12 AM
progressoverpeace;
But it is not direct or truthful, it is stupid. It is a broad brush. It is inaccurate and over the top and hysterical and self destructive. It helps liberals and hurts conservatives. It serves no purpose other than to make her detractors look like crazy people.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 7:14 AM
She belongs to an organization that supports the “rights” of illegals to roam our streets, where they commit enough rapes, murders, and homocides to make your head spin.
Try and keep the argument straight. We are talking about the organization, not every individual in it. The sort of selective, and variable, scaling of context that you are engaging in is a typical tactic of the left. It doesn’t fly in a real debate.
progressoverpeace on May 29, 2009 at 7:17 AM
Admittedly Terrye, I wasn’t following that train of thought…your ongoing discussion …
I was addressing the main theme of this thread…La Rarsa and how it supports and defends illegal aliens….
jerrytbg on May 29, 2009 at 7:19 AM
Dear goopers, you send Tancredo out as a front man? Are you trying to drive away the hispanic vote? Karl Rove himself spoke before LaRaza, should Karl be thrown under the bus too?Obama is playing the gop for a fool, knowing a hispanic woman, an outspoken one, would drive the “base” into hysterics. And what do you goopers do? You fall for it, hook,line, and sinker.Your getting played, what part of that doesn’t permeate into your thick skulls? Tancredo,KKK, wow. Hear that giant sucking sound, its the hispanic vote leaving the gop. John Cornyn even warned your party not to go there, i.e. Rush,Newt.
athensboy on May 29, 2009 at 7:20 AM
progressoverpeace:
La Raza is as legal as the AARP.
That is a fact. If you want to make them a criminal enterprise, then push for legislation to make it a crime to belong to LaRaza, in the meantime there are plenty of people who have never broken a law who are part of this group, like it or not.
I do think that it would be a good thing to question her about LaRaza and her support of the group, but if you start yakking about the KKK, you have lost any semblance of objectivity and balance and it will only help her. It will not hurt her. Nothing that Tancredo is saying here will keep her off the bench…if anything it will have the opposite effect. There are ways to do these things, and this is not the way.
Terrye on May 29, 2009 at 7:20 AM
Terrye,
They are what they are… If we go along to get along we will loose all credibility…at some point in time you have make a stand…la Raza is a racist org…
jerrytbg on May 29, 2009 at 7:26 AM
Huh? So what? Neo-nazi groups are legal, too. So what? People are allowed to be racists and are allowed to associate with racists. Legality has nothing to do with this.
Put down the bong and slowly step away. They are racists. What does this criminality, all of a sudden, have to do with anything? Remember what I told you about “selective, and variable, scaling of context that you are engaging in”. Well, you’re doing it again.
Why? They have the right of free association. They are scumbags, but they are allowed to be scumbags together.
Oy. Again, you can say the same for just about every group on Earth, from the Nazis to the Communist party members to the French revolutionaries … Please stop with this line of argument.
No, it will not help her. It will hurt her very much, as it should.
Whatever.
progressoverpeace on May 29, 2009 at 7:36 AM
The internal civil war in the Republican party is thoroughly unnecessary, but perhaps unavoidable, human nature being what it is.
The Republicans do not have to make any firm decision as to whether their future is Dem. lite or Conservative. They merely have to oppose Obama at every turn, on every vote, and in every way, and be there waiting when he finally destroys the country. Everyone will vote Republican, as we saw with Reagan.
So right now, we can make a big fuss or a little fuss over Sotomayor (I’m for metaphorically lynching the b*tch) but it doesn’t matter. The Dem’s are hanging themselves anyway. I agree that one party is going to be out of power for a long long time, but I think the jury’s still out as to which party that is. :)
JiangxiDad on May 29, 2009 at 7:36 AM
This should read:
What does this idea of criminality, all of a sudden, have to do with anything?
progressoverpeace on May 29, 2009 at 7:37 AM
You are getting all lathered up for nothing! Again, not one Republican Senator on the committee…NOT ONE will challenge, vote against or pick a fight over this nominee. The deal is done and she is approved!
Rather than running to blogs to post opinions and listening to Rush and Hannity, it might be time for Conservatives to think about organizing for the winning of elections! Without victory at the polls none of this means squat and it’s time that people started to understand that! I think conservatives believe that calling into a talk show or writing a comment on a blog matters. It doesn’t!
Have you heard one comment about this nominee from the GOP or the RNC? From leaders in Congress? THAT is the problem that must be fixed!
sabbott on May 29, 2009 at 7:38 AM
We certainly don’t want to offend the left if we expect to get a good seat on the bus to the reeducation camp.
peacenprosperity on May 29, 2009 at 7:43 AM
In America today, a coalition of minorities can elect a President. As long as they still want Obama (meaning he hasn’t sufficiently harmed the country yet), I don’t think conservatives can win by offering a different philosophy of governance( average people don’t want to hear that kind of intellectual stuff), except perhaps in a few key places that weren’t really firmly in the Obama camp anyway (Virginia maybe.)
I think our main chance at regaining power will come only after much more damage is done. Most people aren’t finished with our version of the Princess Diana adoration orgy, but I don’t think most people in Britain today think about her one way or another. I’m hoping that America tires of its current fad. Even Am. Idol is faltering.
JiangxiDad on May 29, 2009 at 7:45 AM
BOR Voice:
And tonight’s topic of the Talking Points Memo….
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 7:56 AM
I agree. Tancredo makes us look, not strong or principled, but like idiots. This kind of hyperbole accomplishes nothing. It may feel good, but feeling good about yourself is not what conservatism is about. Neither is wishful thinking or political stupidity masquerading as straight talk.
el gordo on May 29, 2009 at 8:02 AM
I am officially worried about Loxadonta. I am pretty sure that hermits don’t go on vacation. Can you think of anything we can do?
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:02 AM
I was thinking about him last night.
I have his email and will email him as of 802 am
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:02 AM
cindy
i will be at work from 10-8 or 9 tonight
but give me your email (click my name and go to the about page itll have my GMAIL) if you want, and I will send you a communique the minute Lox sends me one.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:08 AM
Thank you. I know I am being silly, can’t help it.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:09 AM
nah, you’re not. I went to bed last night and was like “wonder where he went.”
It’s just weird when people go BLOOP and are gone. I mean the internet is the internet, but when they post you know its a part of their daily routine, and when something disrupts it and they STOP COMPLETELY, something is up, good or bad.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:10 AM
bad news — my email to lox got send back with the MailerDaemon failure message
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:11 AM
“Hyperbole for me, but not for thee”, said the random liberal.
That’s the big problem here. If a politician has that (D) next to their name they can go out and say something stupid, mispeak, lie, embellish, whatever… then come out the next day and say, “Well, what I meant to say was…”, “What I was trying to say was…” and it’s over.
Their fellow (D)s won’t press the issue, the MSM won’t press the issue, and if some big, bad meanie with the (R) tries to press the issue, they are called out for engaging in the politics of personal destruction. This is what needs to change.
To me, that is the story here, not what Tancredo said. I’m so tried of members of the GOP who wet themselves and throw each other to the wolves over every little thing. All the hand wringing, and apologizing for others, and prostrating themselves in front of the MSM doesn’t work.
The reason the dems and the MSM get away with their crap is that there are so few members of the GOP who will fight back. So Tancredo said something that makes someone uncomfortable, something less than PC. Well BOO FREAKING HOO.
If you don’t agree with it, that’s fine, say so. When you want to take it a step further and try to make excuses for La Raza or drop to your knees in submission in front of your MSM/Dem masters – you aren’t winning any votes.
reaganaut on May 29, 2009 at 8:11 AM
Porn overload.
Guaranteed.
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 8:13 AM
First, you are terrible./
Second, your explanation would be great.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Now what? If he had not had that fall I probably wouldn’t give this a second thought but now I am worried. This is going to drive me crazy.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:21 AM
The only option is a wait.
My email told me his email posted on my blog doesn’t exist.
Other than that there is nothing else one can do, except wait to see if he comes back.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:23 AM
We’ve never referred to La Raza as a “Latin KKK”, but have for years called them “The Clan with the tan”…Same thing I guess…
golfer1 on May 29, 2009 at 8:26 AM
I am trying to overcome my urge to write Ed about it. I can go Mom in zero to sixty in two seconds.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:29 AM
Well, it’s your call. Maybe he’s having internet problems, or he’s having family over, or his computer broke, or he’s sick with something, or maybe he’s sick of the computer and wants to read.
But I don’t blame you Cind. The minute I don’t hear from my woman after she drives home at night to tell me she’s home, I get all
“WHAT IFFFFFF/1?!”
so it’s okay. Chances are it’s something not serious
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:32 AM
You are right the reasons are endless. I’ll settle down now.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:41 AM
Agreed. My fiancee checks in when we’re not together.
FWIW Cindy, I took off for 2-3 weeks a month ago. With politics, sometimes you just burn out and need a break. Life happens.
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 8:42 AM
Well you’re a caring person so its okay.
Here’s a pick me up for you on this morning:
I made my coffee.
Pressed “on, start” and walked away.
Came back 5 minutes later to see I never put the pot in the coffee machine.
/bloody mess
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:43 AM
It’s true. sometimes you need a refresh!
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:43 AM
And if you’ll remember, I noticed. I am sorry guys, you are right and I am acting like a girl. Thanks for bringing me back to Earth. You are the greatest.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 8:45 AM
LOL you aren’t acting like a girl
You’re just a good person — that’s all.
We all engage in the worry — no big.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 8:46 AM
The whole premise behind allah’s post is that this shows America that the republican party and/or conservatives are mean and nasty;
1) There are things like this said on fox every single night by liberals and there is absolutely no outrage against or effect on the democrats. I would argue that debating whether tancredo should have said this is un-American and the direction the democrat party has been pushing us in for 50 years and to where we seem to be hurtling at a scary rate under the current regime, the suspension of freedom of speech. We all complain about the double standard so much that the true meaning of it all seems to have been watered down; we no longer have freedom of speech in this country when the media and the democrat party dictates what can be said.
2) The problem with this isn’t what tancredo said, it’s allowing the left to use this one irrelevent incident to take the focus off the real issue, whether this woman has the qualifications, ability and temperment to be on the supreme court. Over and over again the left does this with important issues that they cannot support with reasoned debate and are assisted by squishy rinos.
3) I have heard nothing good about la raza,have watched videos of speaches by la raza representatives and speakers that were incendiary and racist. The issue should not be that tancredo used a phrase that the left has deemed only to be used against conservatives or that la raza is on the lefts list of untouchables but whether her membership is a sign of a belief system that is in direct contradiction to our laws and constitutional philosophy.
peacenprosperity on May 29, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Now that I’ve got you out of Mom mode, can I put you into a more nasty mode?
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 8:57 AM
As Norwood established, La Raza is the legitimate front for its illegitimate offspring MEChA. The two organizations not only share in the same membership, but in the same leadership; and La Raza financially funds MEChA via OUR TAX DOLLARS.
Tancredo is cutting the chase because the general populace can’t follow a comparison that goes beyond one step sound bite mentality. His premise and conclusion are correct, but to withstand ultimate inevitable criticism, all he has to do is say it again INCLUDING THE REFERENCE that La Raza is yet unequivocably tied to MEChA.
Norwood’s article was published 04/07/2006.
Force critics of Tancredo to show where La Raza has met Norwood’s six point challenge to prove their honor as responsible US citizens. Where is La Raza’s record on curbing the radical extremism of their related organization that La Raza funds via US TAX DOLLARS.
It is offensive that La Raza would assume any “integrity” as a Hispanic Rotary comparable club. The Rotary does NOT fund terror organizations. La Raza does. As is, La Raza remains in comparison to a “legitimate” front for a Mafia.
Michelle Malkin SHOULD specifically personally contact Tancredo with the word to the wise.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM
I’ll have you know, Sir, that I am a married woman. But you welcome to try. /
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 9:15 AM
I’ve been missing Lox for days, as well. When he took his fall, I realized just how fragile his situation; he hadn’t been kidding/exaggerating about any descriptions.
We know Loxodonta’s style and manners.
He would not simply go on vacation without a word.
Lox: best wishes!
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:16 AM
I’ll have you know, Madam, that I am a cad. I’ll take you up on that invitation.
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:18 AM
This is how it’s done.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:20 AM
Yea I know.
I hope he’s okay.
Bastard left a fake email on my blog so I can’t email him!
A true hermit!
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:21 AM
Rhett Butler is my hero.
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:21 AM
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 8:57 AM
Not only off topic, but lewd.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Sorry, they are just trying to cheer me up. MadisonConservative’s attempts are just a bit more unconventional. I agree with you that Loxadonta would not have gone anywhere without saying and he told me he did not see a doctor after his fall. I have to pray that hermits have people that check on them.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 9:28 AM
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:21 AM
Lox said he had no TV and no radio, only his computer.
I think he’s hurt. He may be unconscious.
He may have lost his online account.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:28 AM
IDK
Let’s not consider the worst.
Chances are he might be meditating or something.
If he doesn’t come around in the next few days/week, then we have right to worry.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Ok I’m out to work.
Cindy I will let you know if I hear anything by chance.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM
This is a perfect issue for the republicans but alas they will squander it away. I already see Cornyn apoligizing for newt and Rushes comments. Just sad and we all can see how politcal correctness is a one way street simply because our side lets the left control the lanquage.
Here is Tom is making a valid point, given the way she ruled on the Ricci case and then coupled together with giving a speech in fron of the racial sepratist group like la Raza should disqualfy her.
But listen to what our side is bitching about(should he have said this or that in describing La Raza). This is what depresses me about our side.
kangjie on May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM
If Ed would try contacting Lox, I wish he would.
Doesn’t Lox live in NYC? Somehow I got that impression. Besides Meals On Wheels, Joan Rivers has a NYC charity that checks in on people needing contact with a lunch and visit. Loxodonta is one of those extremely rare humans who deserve only the best from people.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM
Oh, great, I am now back to frantic. I can’t believe how helpless I feel.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 9:34 AM
I thought about contacting Ed about it but I like to keep the people who know I am crazy down to a minimum.
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 9:36 AM
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM
If he were your age, you could assume that attitude more easily.
Perhaps you haven’t cared for the aged yet. If he’s incapacitated, he needs immediate help.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Try to keep it in check, cind.
You’re going to drive yourself NUTS. Breathe!
But maybe Ed can try to contact him.
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:36 AM
No, I know. I watched my grandparents die slowly, I know how it is.
I just — I always assume the worst and I’m trying not to this time.
ttys
blatantblue on May 29, 2009 at 9:36 AM
OH LAWDY OFF WITH ‘IS ‘EAD!
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:40 AM
I didn’t vote for Cornyn last November…It looks like I get to say I told you so, untill this guy loses his Senate Seat.
From up top Headlines. I won’t vote for Hutchinson either. If Governor Perry has any real sense of the populist sentiment in this state he will distance himself from these two political hacks. Maybe before criticizing Tancrado, maybe some folks, would want to come down here, and try living in mythical Aztlan. Which has nothing to do with Puerto Rico.
Dr Evil on May 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Cindy Munford on May 29, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Email Ed or Allahpundit with the particulars and let them reference it.
We’ll all pray for Lox’s well being. You know, he has God in his heart and our thoughts are with him.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:42 AM
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:40 AM
Go thread your taste on your own green board.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM
Remove the branch from thine backside. This isn’t the first time you’ve whined about my green room status. What’s your deal?
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:48 AM
MadisonConservative on May 29, 2009 at 9:48 AM
It’s your deal with yourself.
You want to make a mess, do your own cleaning.
maverick muse on May 29, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »