UN Security Council issues strongly worded memo, Kim responds
posted at 8:46 am on May 26, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The UN Security Council acted with unusual alacrity and unanimity to condemn North Korea’s underground nuclear test this weekend, threatening new sanctions … but not actually imposing any. Kim Jong-Il took the measure of the UNSC and of global leadership, and responded with a barrage of short-range missile launches, testing his weaponry and rattling his saber:
North Korea, defiant in the face of international condemnation of its latest nuclear test, fired two more short-range missiles off its east coast on Tuesday and accused the United States of plotting against its government.
In a move certain to compound tensions in the region, South Korea said it would join a U.S.-led initiative to intercept ships suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction, something Pyongyang has warned it would consider a declaration of war.
South Korea’s Yonhap news agency quoted a government source in Seoul as saying the North had test-fired one surface-to-air and one surface-to-ship missile off its east coast. The missiles had a range of about 130 km (80 miles).
North Korea could also launch by Wednesday more short-range missiles, perhaps toward a disputed sea border with the South, South Korean media quoted government sources as saying.
Michelle referred to the UN resolution as “the comfy chair,” but it sounds more like a warning that they might fetch the comfy chair:
The U.N. Security Council swiftly condemned North Korea’s nuclear test on Monday as “a clear violation” of a 2006 resolution and said it will start work immediately on another one that could result in new sanctions against the reclusive nation. …
After a brief emergency meeting held at Japan’s request, the council demanded that North Korea abide by two previous resolutions, which among other things called for Pyongyang to abandon all nuclear weapons and return to six-party talks aimed at eliminating its nuclear program.
It also called on all other U.N. member states to abide by sanctions imposed on the North, including embargoes on arms and material that could be used in its nuclear and ballistic missile programs and ship searches for banned weapons.
If he already violated UNSC resolutions, shouldn’t they have had sanctions at the ready? Why do they need to go back to decide whether to impose sanctions?
Kim apparently wasn’t terribly impressed with the UNSC warning about maybe, possibly, applying more sanctions to North Korea. After watching China and Russia over the last few years on both his own situation and on Iran, why should he be? And as long as the US continues to pursue the issue through the UN, then Kim knows he has no real concerns that any consequences of import will accrue from his actions. He could do everything short of an attack on Seoul and get nothing more than a strongly worded memo.
Of course, Kim couldn’t have been terribly impressed with the response from the US, either. Barack Obama issued a moderately tough statement after Pyongynag’s first successful nuclear test … and then went golfing for four hours. If Obama signaled that such an event was so unimportant that it didn’t need to interrupt his golf game, what message did he think that would send to Kim? Or, for that matter, to the rest of the tinpot dictators with nuclear ambitions, including the mullahs of Iran?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Normally, the assumption is an implied /sarc. In this case however, maybe an explicit /sarc?
I was thinking that since Obambi has already jumped with both feet onto the ‘fair and just’ brigade to bring international misery…err, equality…that perhaps we could just give Isreal all of our nuclear weapons? I wonder, would Obambi be in favor of outsourcing our glass parking-lot construction to Tel Aviv? I bet they could do a bang-up job.
Geministorm on May 26, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Watch this
darwin-t on May 26, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Animal House: Starring Kim Jong Ill and his happy grinning North Korea Delta buddies; who are (un)accepted into the Nuclear Fraternity and join in on the wild toga parties, road trips, random rocket launches, occasional drunkenness, ribald debauchery, underground nuclear detonations, practical jokes and quite often starve their own frat boys. But Dean Obama is not so determined to have North Korea kicked off campus and its members expelled, so he sort of kind of enlists the help of Omega house and its former IAEA inspector Mohamed ElBaradei and so and so Hans Blix and insists on yet another drafted resolution strongly condemning Animal House by the U.N. Security Council. Yet, North Korea and its zany Delta throng won’t go away quietly. Costars an unforgettable Bluto, played by John Belushi and Donald Sutherland also stars as the pot smoking Professor Jennings. Spoiler Alert; be sure to catch that edge of your seat scene where Kim Jong’s seemingly innocent cake float turns into a horrifying Black Death on wheels and destroys Dean Obama’s homecoming parade. Coming soon to a theatre near you.
falderal on May 26, 2009 at 4:39 PM
Can I join in too?
People who call acronyms abbreviations drive me crazy!
:)
YiZhangZhe on May 26, 2009 at 5:02 PM
This time they wrote ALL IN CAPS!!!
That’ll work!
DSchoen on May 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM
I wish I knew but these things come to mind:
(1) For many people in positions of power, attention does seem to be what they crave and are driven to seek.
(2) People who lock themselves in isolation can become paranoid, lose their sense of perspective and their ability assess matters clearly, and see bogeymen hiding in the shadows. If people living in the mostly fresh clear air of the USA and Europe can postulate wild conspiracy theories then those who have been steaming in the pressure cooker of NK for several decades can presumably do so too.
(3) They do have two nuclear-armed neighbours, neither of which is guaranteed to be North Korea’s long-term friend. Plus their southern neighbour and ideological adversary is being greatly assisted by a third nuclear-armed country.
So, what looks like madness from the outside, perhaps seems a whole lot more justifiable from the inside.
YiZhangZhe on May 26, 2009 at 5:15 PM
I get so tired of hearing this misquote. He said he had visited 57 states, his staff wouldn’t let him go to Alaska or Hawaii (?) and he had one more to go. He was basically saying we had sixty states, not 57.
See, he’s not as stupid as people think he is.
But your point is well taken.
I just hope Uhhhhbama doesn’t do something like “double dog dare” NK or Iran to launch a nuclear missile.
darwin-t on May 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM
Obama:I strongly oppose and um ..er.. demand that you cease and desist your pursuit of.. ahh ..er nuclear weapons and ..um deliverey .um ..systems.Or else.
Kim Jong Il:Eat Shi* a$$hole.
Strong diplomacy. Don’cha love it?
DDT on May 26, 2009 at 9:13 PM
And the League of Nations is still upset that Il Duce went ahead and invaded Ethiopia. They’re looking again at a strongly worded protest.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 27, 2009 at 3:09 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2