Another czar in the executive branch
posted at 5:22 pm on May 26, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
The Obama administration will appoint yet another “czar” to put in charge of policy outside the bureaucratic organization, this time on cybersecurity. In essence, Barack Obama will have one man running the Internet, or at least its American resources, in order to better coordinate security for both public and private networks:
President Obama is expected to announce late this week that he will create a “cyber czar,” a senior White House official who will have broad authority to develop strategy to protect the nation’s government-run and private computer networks, according to people who have been briefed on the plan.
The adviser will have the most comprehensive mandate granted to such an official to date and will probably be a member of the National Security Council but will report to the national security adviser as well as the senior White House economic adviser, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deliberations are not final.
The dual reporting function is a key to the post. Lawrence Summers, the Washington Post reports, worries that an unbalanced focus on security will blunt on-line economic growth through a burgeoning thicket of regulation. He wants the Council of Economic Advisers to have some authority to block regulation and enforcement on private networks that will damage the economy.
The appointment of a czar comes as a piece with the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, though, which already grants some far-reaching power to the executive branch. While most wondered whether Obama would “shut down” the Internet on the pretense of national security, the actual threat involves the legal authority to demand records without a warrant or probable cause. As I wrote almost two months ago, in the hands of a political commissar, that could mean trouble for administration critics if the government abuses that authority:
Section 14 may be a bigger problem. It essentially revokes all privacy safeguards on Internet use for all networks. The Fourth Amendment would go straight out the window with the explicit inclusion of “private sector owned critical infrastructure information systems and networks.” While Section 18 limits jurisdiction to federal networks, Section 14 allows the government to go after private networks without search warrants. The section also doesn’t limit the jurisdiction to acute attacks, either. That jurisdiction exists at all times.
The big problem isn’t that Obama might shut down the Internet. It’s that the bill essentially repeals the Fourth Amendment.
And now Obama wants to put that power in the hands of one man, answerable only to Obama himself. Of course, that’s how the czars ran Russia back in the day, too … and look how well that turned out.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Oh Crap!
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Liberal trolls say: We like having Washington in complete control of our life.
lorien1973 on May 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Quick! Pass another TARP-like slush fund for this czar. Every czar needs a perpetual fund from which to rule. It just isn’t as much fun otherwise.
progressoverpeace on May 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM
More like: You lifez is MINE!
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Interesting. Most fanatical libs online are huge “privacy” people. This will not make them happy (nor should it). So will Obama piss off the young internet crowd with this?
Or is this going to be another case of “I don’t care you have concentration camps as long as it’s only conservatives in it?”
Vanceone on May 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Too many Czars, not enough leadership. Obama is outsourcing his responsibility to anyone who will be a fall guy.
Today’s Czar is tomorrow’s Strawman.
portlandon on May 26, 2009 at 5:25 PM
There can be only ONE blackberry!
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:25 PM
Opps I guess that was wrong of me to say black. Hmmm what to name it what to name it.. crack berry but then that is offensive to drug addicted people.
The wonderment of the ONE who controls the INTERNET!
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Nobody is talking about the 800 pound elephant in the room.
Will it be human?
Joe Caps on May 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM
And as Instapundit notes:
Paul_in_NJ on May 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM
So Allah, going back to your old career as a before model?
- The Cat
MirCat on May 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM
All your internets are belong to us.
Daggett on May 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Gotta be Ted Stevens. No one else is more qualified.
Tubes.
MadisonConservative on May 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Is Allah’s cat(s) the holder of the internet?
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Too late, they drank the Kool-Aid, so they’ll rationalize it, “Oh, it’s ok, Obama just wants to protect us from harm”. Fool me once, shame on you, Fool me twice, call me a liberal.
kirkill on May 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM
The obvious choice is algore.
kirkill on May 26, 2009 at 5:31 PM
Come on, are you kidding me? He better slow down before the great unwashed start to have tea parties.
Cindy Munford on May 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Let’s just get it over with, what port number do I need to open up to give federal government access to my private network?
WashJeff on May 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Oh…you make me laugh! The script kiddies pissed off at the One?
They could watch live video of Obama having sex with dead young boys and that would be ok.
BobMbx on May 26, 2009 at 5:35 PM
“Mr Citizen, this is the Treasury Department. I noticed you have been accumulating too much of our money, based on your internet transactions…..”
Vashta.Nerada on May 26, 2009 at 5:35 PM
I only hope he gets a really cool uniform. Something silver and shiny./
milwife88 on May 26, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Obama’s Marxist regime is making “1984″ look like anarchy.
rplat on May 26, 2009 at 5:36 PM
That would probably be a baby elephant!
Steve Z on May 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM
I am telling you, this is almost the exact pattern in Animal Farm…the similarities are just amazing.
Published in 1945…of course it is a satire of the Russion Revolution, which makes it even more interesting.
But I am sure Obama is doing this for the betterment of us all…
These rules must be changed to protect us from ourselves…
right2bright on May 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM
He’ll name the guy who hacked into Sarah Palin’s personal E-mail.
Steve Z on May 26, 2009 at 5:38 PM
I for one welcome my new Internet overlords.
angryed on May 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM
I hope it’s Biden. He’s been trying to figure out what to do with all those old AOL discs.
Jim Treacher on May 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Please. Uncle Sugar can’t get FBI computers up to speed. They could hire Symantec for a fraction of the cost and it would all work in a matter of months. No, they will put in Elmer Fudd and Bawney Frank to make sure that everyone is up to speed on 1995 technology.
Limerick on May 26, 2009 at 5:40 PM
also seems they made decisions on which dealerships to close by which give money to the GOP
jp on May 26, 2009 at 5:40 PM
I guess those Cabinet members are just window dressing – annointing a czar must be so liberating.
katiejane on May 26, 2009 at 5:41 PM
This is relatively benign since I heard that the Constitution has been “SHREDDED” by Bushitler and Darth Cheney for the last eight years.
Jeff on May 26, 2009 at 5:41 PM
Who’s going to go after them, the justice department? Get ready for hate crime indictments fellow hot air posters. big brother is watching.
peacenprosperity on May 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM
Dear Mr. 0bama, I take back everything I said. I really think you’re keen.
Cicero43 on May 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM
Next he’ll need a cazr czar to control all his [beep]ing czars.
RandyChandler on May 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Kwap.
ladyingray on May 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Oh well, this internet fad was never going to last long anyway…
myrenovations on May 26, 2009 at 5:44 PM
‘He wants the Council of Economic Advisers to have some authority to block regulation and enforcement on private networks that will damage the economy.’
Obie’s goal is to destroy the economy, not damage it. The next step in the planned destruction of the USA, as we knew it.
Yeesh.
frizzbee on May 26, 2009 at 5:45 PM
haha I got my gorilla and elephant metaphors screwed up. I don’t know. Metaphors were never my forte.
Joe Caps on May 26, 2009 at 5:45 PM
lol! God I hated those thing.
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM
He tried calling their support line but could not find the phone address.
Joe Caps on May 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM
And, now from the article you yourself quoted…
Get smart Ed. For that matter, isn’t the SecDef answerable only to one man? I guess we should fire him too… to much power there. How about the CIA Director… answerable only to one man… fire him too. NASA Director, answerable only to one man, fire him too. In fact, fire every Cabinet member… because, get this, they’re answerable only to one man! wow dizshnits!
And having senatorial courtesy extended to czars wouldn’t hold them accountable, rather it would give Congress and Republicans a new something to complain about – and after all that’s what you want. Now isn’t it?
PresidenToor on May 26, 2009 at 5:48 PM
Will the last freedom thrown under the bus please turn out the light?
CynicalOptimist on May 26, 2009 at 5:48 PM
aaaaaaaaaaand now i fight.
cybersecurity act of 2009? nope.
ernesto on May 26, 2009 at 5:49 PM
The last freedom?
Great title for a blog.
Limerick on May 26, 2009 at 5:51 PM
ROFLMAO!
TheBigOldDog on May 26, 2009 at 5:51 PM
“All Your Internets Are Belong To Us”
- Obama’s iNet Czar
Will it get worse before it gets better? You betcha!
Timothy S. Carlson on May 26, 2009 at 5:52 PM
Dear Internet Security Czar,
I am a Cossack! Really! Honest! Trust me!
Sincerely
Limerick on May 26, 2009 at 5:53 PM
Ed said “answerable.”
The story said that he may report to others.
Did you consider that there may be a difference before you pitched your tent thinking you had Ed in a gotcha moment?
Joe Caps on May 26, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Allah, I’d hold off on deleting that “2004 Taxes” folder until you know something definite.
Matticus Finch on May 26, 2009 at 5:58 PM
“All your internets are belong to us.”
Daggett on May 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Do you know how profound this is?
Cybergeezer on May 26, 2009 at 5:59 PM
Biden would be awesome. He knows all about website “numbers”.
My second choice the inventor of the internet himself – Algore
My third choice would be Howard Dean. We could call him
Czardean.
diogenes on May 26, 2009 at 5:59 PM
Allah’s Cat are holding the internet in the palm of the paw.
Bribe them with Pounce!
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 6:00 PM
is that like Hiney in a Can?
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 6:01 PM
What part of this anti-Fourth Amendment plan do you like, pray tell?
Were you one of the people squawking about the wire intercepts that originated outside of our country back in the day?
onlineanalyst on May 26, 2009 at 6:01 PM
I think the Dems in Congress are being extremely short-sighted by allowing The Precedent to get away with all the power-grabbing that he is doing. Eventually, he won’t be President and someone they don’t like will be…
ladyingray on May 26, 2009 at 6:02 PM
This is good….really good Cat. Thanks.
UnEasyRider on May 26, 2009 at 6:02 PM
Need to buy more “Rahm”
If they want to appoint a monitor for the sheeple, we really don’t want to erase our stuff. Then they can’t read it.
seven on May 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM
More ways to control your life.
And a special bonus!!! This is the pathway to spying on you as well.
Make sure your neigbors like you.
That’s next.
notagool on May 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM
close enough for government work!
diogenes on May 26, 2009 at 6:04 PM
So; How long before Obamassole appoints his responsibilities out completely? Can we get rid of him after that? How much more useless can he get?
Cybergeezer on May 26, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Do these czars have to testify under oath before Congress?
myrenovations on May 26, 2009 at 6:05 PM
Creating Jobs, for the Elite, in Government….
need I go on?
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 6:06 PM
Great question.
Any enlightenment on extra-constitutional positions? Or are they all covered by a blanket called executive privilege?
Limerick on May 26, 2009 at 6:08 PM
If subpoenaed too…
PresidenToor on May 26, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Is there no way to stop all of this czar crap?!!! I guess when the AG is one of Obama’s butt-boys the department of justice won’t step in. I think I’m already on their list for my right-wing commerce site…wonder if they’ll shut me down and throw me into a radical-rightwing terrorist camp? Load up the truck, maw…we’re movin’ to Montana!
DCJeff on May 26, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Keep going north. California is taking over.
upinak on May 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM
That word “czar” really needs to be eliminated. It was an interesting term when it was initially used, but it is entirely too appropriate for this administration. No more reminders necessary.
sherry on May 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM
Sen. Byrd says that they are covered by blanket executive privilege. Perhaps he is incorrect? Or perhaps Obama will waive the privilege for them?
myrenovations on May 26, 2009 at 6:16 PM
Most probably YES.
cobrakai99 on May 26, 2009 at 6:16 PM
Next,…the Obama Browser.
christene on May 26, 2009 at 6:17 PM
I could care less what mister 91 years old thinks. If subpoenaed too appear before Congress, you go or get an attorney and fight it out in the courts – that’s why there are these three branches, when two get involved the other is meant to step in and resolve the matter.
Executive privilege doesn’t even exist as a matter of law – or logic.
PresidenToor on May 26, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Huh? This boob thinks there’s going to be growth….of anything at all….while he’s taxing and regulating everything and everyone right back to the stone age?
Spiritk9 on May 26, 2009 at 6:22 PM
Most probably NOT. But thanks for assuming things out of ignorance. Wiretap who ever you want where ever you want, whether you want to or maybe you don’t.
However, one best not get angry at the consequences. Like when the NSA sent the FBI dozens of false leads b/c their wiretaps’ capturing and recording scheme led to hundreds of false positives.
PresidenToor on May 26, 2009 at 6:23 PM
Cyber Czar Joe Biden’s first decree will be that URLs will now be called FDRs, in honor of their inventor.
Jim Treacher on May 26, 2009 at 6:28 PM
I’m going to give this time to sink in with the lemmings, and check for reaction. This should be fun.
sybilll on May 26, 2009 at 6:30 PM
If Bush was the one to appoint a single person to run the country’s internet resources the left would be howling in outrage. I’m in the web industry and I was berated non-stop by liberal colleagues everytime the Bush administration did something these people thought perpetuated the myth that our former President was an idiot (one such kerfuffle involved the mess the White House IT department made of the administration’s email archives). But now that Obama, their man, is in power not a single peep from them concerning what is far more an egregious issue than lost emails. Even ArsTechnica buried the story, and by buried I mean ignored, and by ignored I mean sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting YES WE CAN at the top of their lungs.
smfoushee on May 26, 2009 at 6:37 PM
How does Al Gore feel about his Invention being so corrupted by the Government?
portlandon on May 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM
I really wish i had learned more about hacking right now
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on May 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM
What could go wrong.
Johan Klaus on May 26, 2009 at 6:42 PM
While written with fury and forcefulness, your assertion is not entirely correct.
It will be interesting to see how the czars play out if there is a change in the parties controlling Congress while Obama is still in office.
myrenovations on May 26, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Roar!! Good one JT
Rovin on May 26, 2009 at 6:43 PM
So, do you think if I fill out an SF-171 and send it over the transom I’d have a shot?
My, “priorities” might not exactly match the administration’s (OK, kiddie porn enforcement being the only place we’d agree), but I think I’m the right person for the job. I’m willing to make cryptic, arbitrary, capricious decisions for which there is no appeal process.
Oh, an no notes or minutes at meetings. In fact, no meetings. I’ll just make stuff up as I go…
darkpixel on May 26, 2009 at 6:45 PM
And so where are the kooks who shrieked over the non-issue about wireless wiretaps? Now that it is real, they are probably out partying over their kook justice pick.
Gulags are built for those people.
tarpon on May 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM
I just LOVE the comments from Serbia! They have such good internet connections in those caves!
Cybergeezer on May 26, 2009 at 6:51 PM
Are the Kos Kids heads exploding yet?
Does this mean all those sites I shop at that I don’t pay sales tax is now over?
Knucklehead on May 26, 2009 at 6:52 PM
This is relatively benign since I heard that the Constitution has been “SHREDDED” by Bushitler and Darth Cheney for the last eight years.
Jeff on May 26, 2009 at 5:41 PM
Is that why Obama can’t seem to find it or remember what it said about a fedeal government,state rights, individual freedoms and pesky little idea that he must be eliagable to be president.
Franklyn on May 26, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Der Fuhrer has spoken, we must but obey.
GarandFan on May 26, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Wir haben Möglichkeiten, die Sie übermittelt haben.
Johan Klaus on May 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM
The Kos Kids have nothing to worry about. After all, they are on his side — aren’t they?
As far as “tax-free” internet shopping goes – yup, it’s in the works. State and probably Fed. It’s only a matter of time.
We can’t have all of those
unemployedredeployed workers grabbing all the gold on the intertubes, right? It might cause the economy to recover, and then they wouldn’t be dependent on the gubmint anymore. Can’t have that – no, no, no…Timothy S. Carlson on May 26, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I love it when you speak french…
Timothy S. Carlson on May 26, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Obama: “Find me a techie security guru that’s figured out how to avoid paying his taxes.” He’ll fit right in.
KS Rex on May 26, 2009 at 7:15 PM
What you say!!
KS Rex on May 26, 2009 at 7:17 PM
Veronica Corningstone for TOTUS Czar!
“Dammit. Who typed a question mark on the Teleprompter? For the last time — anything you type on that prompter, Barry will read!”
selias on May 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM
This is disturbing. Using back channels instead of the normal bureaucracy short circuits some important controls.
It can be very dangerous.
The Kennedy and Johnson administrations both used Gen Maxwell Taylor for their back channel in Vietnam and it reaulted in both State and the Joint Chiefs being cut out of the loop. Taylor’s cables would take precedence over those of people who had much more experience in the area.
The last President we had that knew how to use the organization was Eisenhower. But because he did it so well he was accused of doing nothing. It was just that he knew how to use his staff.
I think they should be termed “Führers” instead of “Czars” because that would make the power and danger of the position more understandable to the general public.
Would anyone support an Internet Führer?
schmuck281 on May 26, 2009 at 7:21 PM
Hey how about a common sense czar! OR a shopping czar, maybe a vacation czar! A CZAR FOR EVERYONE!!!
lanesmerge on May 26, 2009 at 7:25 PM
For progressives its all about collectivism..for the masses, for “The One” its all about idolatry.
Speakup on May 26, 2009 at 7:41 PM
I can’t wait to match wits with the black hats of the Obama regime. Soon I will be viewing all of the personal documents and dirty laundry of the entire Obamination.
From Russia With Love.
Geministorm on May 26, 2009 at 7:46 PM
“Boy oh boy. I’m sure glad we’re past that oh-so-evil GW Bush and his attack on all our civil rights!”
/sarc
kurtzz3 on May 26, 2009 at 7:58 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »