<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Obamanomics: We&#8217;re gonna need a bigger graph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; America, I thought we were friends?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2637536</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; America, I thought we were friends?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2637536</guid>
		<description>[...] policy has quietly been taking shape behind the scenes. While Americans focus on the spectacle of a ballooning deficit as it&#8217;s government has taken unprecedented steps to control of the banking, automotive, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] policy has quietly been taking shape behind the scenes. While Americans focus on the spectacle of a ballooning deficit as it&#8217;s government has taken unprecedented steps to control of the banking, automotive, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Families Cut Way Back on Travel, but Not Congress: All-Time Highs in Spending Taxpayers&#8217; Money on Travel in Democrat Congress &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2378683</link>
		<dc:creator>American Families Cut Way Back on Travel, but Not Congress: All-Time Highs in Spending Taxpayers&#8217; Money on Travel in Democrat Congress &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2378683</guid>
		<description>[...] Those $540 Lanvin sneakers… Nice Image in Face of Depression… Let them wear Keds Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those $540 Lanvin sneakers… Nice Image in Face of Depression… Let them wear Keds Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Voight: Against &#8220;False Prophet&#8221; Obama &#38; Democrat Party: &#8220;Everything Obama Has Recommended Has Turned Out to Be Disastrous&#8230; Breathtaking Speed to Marxism&#8221; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2285974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Voight: Against &#8220;False Prophet&#8221; Obama &#38; Democrat Party: &#8220;Everything Obama Has Recommended Has Turned Out to Be Disastrous&#8230; Breathtaking Speed to Marxism&#8221; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2285974</guid>
		<description>[...] in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph Andrew Breibart, Big Hollywood: Go Jon Voight Go! Michelle Malkin: Jon Voight Speaks and Your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in speeches and Gibbs warns: Be “exceedingly careful” in how you criticize Sotomayor and Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph Andrew Breibart, Big Hollywood: Go Jon Voight Go! Michelle Malkin: Jon Voight Speaks and Your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack &#38; Michelle&#8217;s Saturday Night Date&#8230; Finally, the REAL Cost to Taxpayers Revealed &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2262719</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack &#38; Michelle&#8217;s Saturday Night Date&#8230; Finally, the REAL Cost to Taxpayers Revealed &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2262719</guid>
		<description>[...] Those $540 Lanvin sneakers… Nice Image in Face of Depression… Let them wear Keds Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those $540 Lanvin sneakers… Nice Image in Face of Depression… Let them wear Keds Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2223761</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2223761</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We&#039;re Going to Need a Bigger Graph...&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember this? It gives a general sense of what Comrade Obama is doing to our future. But to be accurate, as Hot Air points out, we&#039;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson: From 2010 to......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re Going to Need a Bigger Graph&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Remember this? It gives a general sense of what Comrade Obama is doing to our future. But to be accurate, as Hot Air points out, we&#8217;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson: From 2010 to&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2221996</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2221996</guid>
		<description>As Rush pointed out, Ogabe&#039;s words were not a repudiation of his own actions.  Rather, they were setting us up for the massive tax increase that will be the only way to support his grand scheme.  Congress is the only wall between us and serfdom.  Scary, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Rush pointed out, Ogabe&#8217;s words were not a repudiation of his own actions.  Rather, they were setting us up for the massive tax increase that will be the only way to support his grand scheme.  Congress is the only wall between us and serfdom.  Scary, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Obamas&#8217; Personal Debt vs. Obama&#8217;s Demand That Americans Cut Back &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2221743</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obamas&#8217; Personal Debt vs. Obama&#8217;s Demand That Americans Cut Back &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2221743</guid>
		<description>[...] that I Don’t Like  Tony Blankley, Rasmussen Reports: Obama Lied; The Economy Died Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear Obama Scared Monkeys: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that I Don’t Like  Tony Blankley, Rasmussen Reports: Obama Lied; The Economy Died Hot Air: Understanding Obamanomics: We’re gonna need a bigger graph and Obama’s “Honest Day’s Work” and Suddenly, business leaders fear Obama Scared Monkeys: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The strongest economy in the world - Page 65 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2221711</link>
		<dc:creator>The strongest economy in the world - Page 65 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2221711</guid>
		<description>[...] this?    Check out what BO is doing to the future. As someone else points out,we&#039;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson:From 2010 to 2019, Obama projects annual deficits totaling $7.1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this?    Check out what BO is doing to the future. As someone else points out,we&#8217;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson:From 2010 to 2019, Obama projects annual deficits totaling $7.1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonbattery</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2221166</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonbattery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2221166</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We&#039;re Going to Need a Bigger Graph...&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember this? It gives a general sense of what Comrade Obama is doing to our future. But to be accurate, as Hot Air points out, we&#039;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson: From 2010 to......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re Going to Need a Bigger Graph&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Remember this? It gives a general sense of what Comrade Obama is doing to our future. But to be accurate, as Hot Air points out, we&#8217;re going to need a bigger graph. To quote Robert J. Samuelson: From 2010 to&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220486</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2220486</guid>
		<description>Obama scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickeehands</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220327</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickeehands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2220327</guid>
		<description>Hyperinflation is going to be awesome.  All those stupid people that actually saved their money are going to get totally hosed!  It&#039;s going to be so wonderful to see so many individuals life savings and hard work vanish &amp; be replaced with worthless money.  It&#039;s fantastic how little they will have to show for their lifetime of sacrifice.  But don&#039;t worry ... when the 1000 dollar bill becomes big again we know which face we&#039;ll get to see on it ... Saint Obama.

Excuse me.  I need to take my happy pills before the urge to blow off my head becomes too great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyperinflation is going to be awesome.  All those stupid people that actually saved their money are going to get totally hosed!  It&#8217;s going to be so wonderful to see so many individuals life savings and hard work vanish &amp; be replaced with worthless money.  It&#8217;s fantastic how little they will have to show for their lifetime of sacrifice.  But don&#8217;t worry &#8230; when the 1000 dollar bill becomes big again we know which face we&#8217;ll get to see on it &#8230; Saint Obama.</p>
<p>Excuse me.  I need to take my happy pills before the urge to blow off my head becomes too great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hope and change: GOP even with Dems in party affiliation for first time since 2005</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220291</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hope and change: GOP even with Dems in party affiliation for first time since 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2220291</guid>
		<description>[...] account for a sudden shift, either. I can only assume that the scope of Obama&#8217;s budget and what it means for future deficits has finally started to sink in. And with health care coming to the floor of the House, not a moment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] account for a sudden shift, either. I can only assume that the scope of Obama&#8217;s budget and what it means for future deficits has finally started to sink in. And with health care coming to the floor of the House, not a moment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Klaus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220107</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2220107</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;CK MacLeod on May 18, 2009 at 5:01 PM
Other men for their times would include Josef Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte, Vlad the Impaler, and the Emperor Caligula.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 Do not forget Adolf and Il Duce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>CK MacLeod on May 18, 2009 at 5:01 PM<br />
Other men for their times would include Josef Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte, Vlad the Impaler, and the Emperor Caligula.</p></blockquote>
<p> Do not forget Adolf and Il Duce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220037</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2220037</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Someone at Hotair needs to learn how to convert those crappy MS-Word quotes into Web-friendly quotes.

Daggett
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes indeedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Someone at Hotair needs to learn how to convert those crappy MS-Word quotes into Web-friendly quotes.</p>
<p>Daggett
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes indeedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el gordo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219999</link>
		<dc:creator>el gordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219999</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What I want is health care reform with responsibility.

And I’m tired of the ridiculous extremes on this issue.

Just do it people.

AnninCA on May 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do what? Don´t you realize you are going to get an extreme solution and it won´t be from conservatives? You are barking up the wrong tree. 

Do you ever go to a left-liberal blog and harangue them on how tired of extremes you are? No?

Your corrupted language notwithstanding, most consevatives actually shy away from extremes. You don´t hear us talking about &quot;fundamental change&quot; and &quot;remaking&quot; everything and we don´t speak with contempt of everything that existed before. 

It´s the left that isn´t satisfied with small, incremental improvements &lt;em&gt;which they have blocked in the pas&lt;/em&gt;t because it would have taken the urgency out of the issue. They want all or nothing.

Don´t worry. You are going to get an extreme solution and you will pay for it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What I want is health care reform with responsibility.</p>
<p>And I’m tired of the ridiculous extremes on this issue.</p>
<p>Just do it people.</p>
<p>AnninCA on May 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Do what? Don´t you realize you are going to get an extreme solution and it won´t be from conservatives? You are barking up the wrong tree. </p>
<p>Do you ever go to a left-liberal blog and harangue them on how tired of extremes you are? No?</p>
<p>Your corrupted language notwithstanding, most consevatives actually shy away from extremes. You don´t hear us talking about &#8220;fundamental change&#8221; and &#8220;remaking&#8221; everything and we don´t speak with contempt of everything that existed before. </p>
<p>It´s the left that isn´t satisfied with small, incremental improvements <em>which they have blocked in the pas</em>t because it would have taken the urgency out of the issue. They want all or nothing.</p>
<p>Don´t worry. You are going to get an extreme solution and you will pay for it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219976</link>
		<dc:creator>CK MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219976</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A man for the times.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Other men for their times would include Josef Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte, Vlad the Impaler, and the Emperor Caligula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A man for the times.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other men for their times would include Josef Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte, Vlad the Impaler, and the Emperor Caligula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonofdy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219972</link>
		<dc:creator>sonofdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219972</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Indeed.
But the future is unwritten.

strangelet on May 18, 2009 at 4:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This baby became obamas when he signed his massive pork bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Indeed.<br />
But the future is unwritten.</p>
<p>strangelet on May 18, 2009 at 4:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>This baby became obamas when he signed his massive pork bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RepubChica</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219945</link>
		<dc:creator>RepubChica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He doesn’t understand enough, and, the moment he begins to, denial mechanisms (and old reflexes) take over.� He’s Scarlett O’Bama, and will worry about it tomorrow.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You don&#039;t say, CK. Really good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He doesn’t understand enough, and, the moment he begins to, denial mechanisms (and old reflexes) take over.� He’s Scarlett O’Bama, and will worry about it tomorrow.</p></blockquote>
<p>You don&#8217;t say, CK. Really good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangelet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219944</link>
		<dc:creator>strangelet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Johan Klaus on May 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed.  
But the future is unwritten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Johan Klaus on May 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed.<br />
But the future is unwritten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Klaus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219828</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219828</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;strangelet on May 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 Obama owns this puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>strangelet on May 18, 2009 at 4:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> Obama owns this puppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219823</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219823</guid>
		<description>I think Obama has contempt for the American people, and his dopey schizo speeches like the one you quote are almost confrontational: &quot;You dopes, I&#039;m playing with you! Don&#039;t you get it?&quot;

Well, they get what they voted for, what they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama has contempt for the American people, and his dopey schizo speeches like the one you quote are almost confrontational: &#8220;You dopes, I&#8217;m playing with you! Don&#8217;t you get it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, they get what they voted for, what they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangelet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219779</link>
		<dc:creator>strangelet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219779</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;then he&#039;ll stagger in his stylish PJs right out of office, more Hoover, Buchanan, or Carter, than Roosevelt, Lincoln, or Reagan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That would be--  Obama will be remembered as the contemporary analog of Jefferson,  Jackson, and Lincoln.
A man for the times.
:)
The past is written, Highlander.  Bush&#039;s deficits are graved in stone.
Obama is writing the future in the flux of current events.
You don&#039;t know what will happen.
You aren&#039;t exactly the Kwisatch Haderach, or you would have spied the results of Bush&#039;s policies then.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Most believe that a satisfactory future requires a return to an idealized past, a past which never in fact existed.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>then he&#8217;ll stagger in his stylish PJs right out of office, more Hoover, Buchanan, or Carter, than Roosevelt, Lincoln, or Reagan.</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be&#8211;  Obama will be remembered as the contemporary analog of Jefferson,  Jackson, and Lincoln.<br />
A man for the times.<br />
:)<br />
The past is written, Highlander.  Bush&#8217;s deficits are graved in stone.<br />
Obama is writing the future in the flux of current events.<br />
You don&#8217;t know what will happen.<br />
You aren&#8217;t exactly the Kwisatch Haderach, or you would have spied the results of Bush&#8217;s policies then.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Most believe that a satisfactory future requires a return to an idealized past, a past which never in fact existed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits &#171; The Swamp Hermit&#8217;s Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219762</link>
		<dc:creator>Swamp Hermit’s *QUICK* Bits &#171; The Swamp Hermit&#8217;s Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219762</guid>
		<description>[...] and businesses are mobile: They can leave tax-unfriendly states and move to tax-friendly states.  Comparing the projected Obama deficits to the actual Bush deficits:   Economy limiting services of local police &#8211; The recession is altering local law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and businesses are mobile: They can leave tax-unfriendly states and move to tax-friendly states.  Comparing the projected Obama deficits to the actual Bush deficits:   Economy limiting services of local police &#8211; The recession is altering local law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasaur</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219753</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it’s gotta have right hand drive. Rare, that bird.

Limerick on May 18, 2009 at 4:09 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;Indeed. Heck a Javelin itself would be difficult to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it’s gotta have right hand drive. Rare, that bird.</p>
<p>Limerick on May 18, 2009 at 4:09 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Indeed. Heck a Javelin itself would be difficult to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSteve</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics/comment-page-1/#comment-2219741</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/5/18/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-graph-understanding-obamanomics#comment-2219741</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What I want is health care reform with responsibility.

And I’m tired of the ridiculous extremes on this issue.

Just do it people.

AnninCA on May 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Show me a modern political mechanism rewarding responsibility, Ann.

The only health care reform option that doesn&#039;t terrify me is for the &quot;public option&quot; to be set up as 3-4 independent nonprofits with the ability to operate in all 50 states.  No permanent credit line from the Feds, no implicit or explicit government guarantee, no subsidy.

What they&#039;re talking about now is the camel&#039;s nose for single-payer.  We can do better, if we&#039;re to do anything at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What I want is health care reform with responsibility.</p>
<p>And I’m tired of the ridiculous extremes on this issue.</p>
<p>Just do it people.</p>
<p>AnninCA on May 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Show me a modern political mechanism rewarding responsibility, Ann.</p>
<p>The only health care reform option that doesn&#8217;t terrify me is for the &#8220;public option&#8221; to be set up as 3-4 independent nonprofits with the ability to operate in all 50 states.  No permanent credit line from the Feds, no implicit or explicit government guarantee, no subsidy.</p>
<p>What they&#8217;re talking about now is the camel&#8217;s nose for single-payer.  We can do better, if we&#8217;re to do anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
