Quotes of the day

posted at 10:30 pm on May 18, 2009 by Allahpundit

“This is a no-brainer,” Steele told FOX News. “I’m a student of multiplication and addition, and not subtraction and division. My focus is on building a party that reaches across the board.”

Steele ripped into conservatives who want moderates purged from the GOP and rejected former Vice President Dick Cheney’s assertion that in terms of being a Republican, he’d go with Rush Limbaugh over former Secretary of State Colin Powell — who endorsed candidate Barack Obama for president.

“I want a party that speaks to people. The idea that we only narrowly speak to one segment of the population is boneheaded and it’s not reflective of the history of this party,” Steele said. “How is kicking Colin Powell out or kicking Dick Cheney out or Rush Limbaugh in going to feed a child who’s hungry tonight?”

***
First, the Republican Party will be forward-looking – it is time to stop looking backward. Republicans have spent ample time re-examining the past. It has been a healthy and necessary task. But I believe it is now time for Republicans to focus all of our energies on winning the future by emerging as the party of new ideas. Republicans are emerging once again with the energy, the focus, and the determination to turn our timeless principles into new solutions for the future.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

How hard is it for Steele to say that Obama wasn’t the GOP candidate and that is who Powell voted for, let the chips fall where they may?

aikidoka on May 19, 2009 at 7:54 AM

Fine – let’s just stick with “narrow its message”.

That will seal your party’s fate for many elections to come. Angry moderates will start a new partycloser to the middle and you’ll split the vote and the Dems will laugh and laugh and laugh.

Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 7:48 AM

Fine what? Is that you admitting that you run your mouth with nothing to back it up with? Which Republican congressman has said, “Let’s narrow the message?” Oh, here, I’ll help you out. Any congressman that calls for eliminating funding to ACORN is probably narrowing the message in your opinion, no?

Oh, and Dave, you assuming I’m a Republican when you refer to it as “my” party. Well, Dave, do you think Nancy’s policy of lying is hurting your party?

Upstater85 on May 19, 2009 at 7:54 AM

Kicking Michael Steele out of the party leadership would be a great place to start. He makes Biden’s gaffes look mainstream.

Buy Danish on May 19, 2009 at 7:55 AM

How hard is it for Steele to say that Obama wasn’t the GOP candidate and that is who Powell voted for, let the chips fall where they may?

aikidoka on May 19, 2009 at 7:54 AM

Apparently letting people walk away from the party (and in Specter’s case, not forcing the Republican electorate to vote for him) is Small Tentism…

Upstater85 on May 19, 2009 at 7:56 AM

For those of you that think we should “Moderate”… Been there…done that and every time the Republican Party tries it they get slaughtered! Moderates are people who don’t really know what they believe and don’t really want to take a firm position on issues so they “moderate” to the middle so as not to “offend” anyone. They say they are for small government but are willing to allow for huge spending and increased taxes, they say they are for strong national defense but are willing to allow for defense cut backs, they say they are pro life but are willing to fund Planned Parenthood, they say they are for free speech but vote for bills like McCain/Feingold which limits free speech.

It is preferable to either be a liberal or a conservative and have the courage of your convictions and stand on principle! Michael Steele won’t and doesn’t!

sabbott on May 19, 2009 at 7:58 AM

I’m starting to think that this purposeful disruption in the GOP has more to do with the moderates not wanting religion in the party than it is a problem ‘joining up with republicans because they’re too conservative’.

Laura Ingram just said it fine enough.

Republicans get slaughtered in every election where they put up a moderate. Yet Steele thinks that’s the key to winning. Someone needs to stuff an old used jock strap in his cakehole.

Spiritk9 on May 19, 2009 at 8:12 AM

Conservatives do not need to try to understand these clowns. We do not need to have a discussion with them. We do not need to try to win them over. We just need to be polite as we defeat them or drive them out of the party. RINO’s are not our friends.

JellyToast on May 19, 2009 at 8:15 AM

fiscal conservative, defense hawks, anti illegal immigration conservatives & soc. conservatives will all have to vote together or we won’t get someone elected.

remember, bambi is not deviating too far from what he promised on the campaign trail. and 52% voted for him.

we need every living “conservative”, no matter which kind, to win elections.

kelley in virginia on May 19, 2009 at 8:20 AM

You shouldn’t even acknowledge this big tent narrative. It is insulting. The republican party is for life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

You speak about those values and you leave the big tent to those without the hangemdowns to work for it.

tomas on May 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM

Steele backs Crist in Florida who supported porkulus, Steele backs Colin Powell who backed Barak Obama. Steele is getting a paycheck from whom?

Dump Steele.

Angry Dumbo on May 19, 2009 at 8:22 AM

Fine what? Is that you admitting that you run your mouth with nothing to back it up with? Which Republican congressman has said, “Let’s narrow the message?” Oh, here, I’ll help you out. Any congressman that calls for eliminating funding to ACORN is probably narrowing the message in your opinion, no?

Oh, and Dave, you assuming I’m a Republican when you refer to it as “my” party. Well, Dave, do you think Nancy’s policy of lying is hurting your party?

Upstater85 on May 19, 2009 at 7:54 AM
——–
So, so much urine in your cornflakes this morning.

The quote I was referring to was “ripped into conservatives who want moderates purged from the GOP”, which sounds like kicking people out, but if English isn’t your first language, sorry I cannot help you. I realized the kicking out part is secondary to the party narrowing its message, so I retracted it. Sorry that upset you and got you all pumped up to nail me on some technicality. Which, I assume made you feel pretty good. You’re welcome.

But back to relevant things: again, keep narrowing the message and keep moving right. That will guarantee failure. Any idiot can see that.

Sorry to burst your little bubble of self-importance, but the YOUR referred to Hotair in general and not some little personal call out to you. This being a right wing site, it’s reasonable to say “your party” and assume everybody knows it’s the GOP being talked about. I’ve never had anything but bad things to say about Pelosi. Sorry you missed that. But again, I’m not your little internet babysitter.

Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 8:24 AM

The insiders fought against Reagan tooth and nail.

MarkTheGreat on May 19, 2009 at 8:28 AM

So, so much urine in your cornflakes this morning.

OK, Dave, if you fail miserably, talk about urine in someones Cheerios. It’s a winning strategy.

The quote I was referring to was “ripped into conservatives who want moderates purged from the GOP”, which sounds like kicking people out, but if English isn’t your first language, sorry I cannot help you.

Dave, I thought Donks appreciated people whose first language wasn’t English. I guess you aren’t very open minded. So because Steele ripped into these all powerful conservatives that have managed to earn the “kick-out-of-GOP” power, they exist? I must have missed that at the last “I-want-the-kick-out-of-the-GOP-power” meeting.

I realized the kicking out part is secondary to the party narrowing its message, so I retracted it. Sorry that upset you and got you all pumped up to nail me on some technicality. Which, I assume made you feel pretty good. You’re welcome.

Well, I’m going to nail you again. Why do you keep going back to the kicking out, when you yourself admit it’s just a non-issue. Oh, and you wish you could make anyone feel good Ooops didn’t mean to plagiarize you.

But back to relevant things: again, keep narrowing the message and keep moving right. That will guarantee failure. Any idiot can see that.

I’m struggling to see how you have offered anything that is relevant up to this point…

Sorry to burst your little bubble of self-importance, but the YOUR referred to Hotair in general and not some little personal call out to you. This being a right wing site, it’s reasonable to say “your party” and assume everybody knows it’s the GOP being talked about. I’ve never had anything but bad things to say about Pelosi. Sorry you missed that. But again, I’m not your little internet babysitter.

Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Well, by not making a personal little call out to me, you, er, did. OK, then. I hear being bipolar is a b*tch.

Upstater85 on May 19, 2009 at 8:39 AM

Oh well, there go our chances for big gains in 2010 and 2012. I guess Michael wants to keep Barack in there anohter four years.

matthew26 on May 19, 2009 at 8:43 AM

Upstater85 on May 19, 2009 at 8:39 AM

Dave doesn’t even have a dog in this hunt. He is Canadian. It is very easy to sit up there in the Great White North and tell us what our country needs to do to be correct. He embraces the same failed egocentric philosophy as the rest of the clueless Liberals. His exception is that he doesn’t possess the priviledge of American citizenship.

kingsjester on May 19, 2009 at 8:52 AM

keep narrowing the message and keep moving right. That will guarantee failure. Any idiot can see that.

+10!

Grow Fins on May 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Today the GOP’s Michael Steele is supposedly going to give a big speech on the direction of the party.

Keeping with that theme…I’ve got a few things I’d like Mr Steele (and those who care to read this) to know about me, your average conservative who’s still registered “Republican”, but has given serious thought in the last couple of years to changing party affiliation…

To put it simply – I’m tired of the litmus tests. The numerous “factions” within the party have gotten so backed up into their own corners, I don’t think they see it. But, not to worry, because I’m damn sure going to explain it. I’ll only touch on the two “wings” of the GOP that I think need to hear what I have to say.

The so-called “social conservatives” – staunch Republicans and faithful to the end. They are an asset to the party, no question about it. But, when they demand that fellow Repubs and candidates adhere exactly, without question, to what they feel are the most important issues of our time (religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, values), they are basically admitting that they want a party of think-alike “bots”. Well – time to wake up kiddies…It’s never been that way, and is never going to be that way. For example, for a fellow Republican to insinuate that I am not “Christian enough” because I didn’t find Mike Huckabee a politically viable candidate for the GOP ticket,…Well, that’s the kind of thing I’m talking about. This crap has to end, or the party will never come together again.

The so-called “moderates” – They too can be an asset to the party, because (at least every now and then) they find something worthy about conservatism that they like, and they vote for the GOP candidate. But, they lack gumption…backbone…and determination to stick to a solid set of political beliefs. These folks tend to tell the rest of us that we’re too “stiff” – we’re too “rigid” – and that there never seems to be room for a “middle-ground”. They probably have a point, but, here’s the thing….EITHER YOU’RE PRO CORE CONSERVATIVE IDEALS, OR YOU’RE NOT. It’s that simple. One does not advance conservatism, or the GOP, by embracing the ideals and stances of your political opposition, all in the name of getting more members into the party. Lower taxes, less government, more individual freedom…Those have been core political ideals within the party, and to suggest that it’s ok to “waffle” on those things and still be a conservative Republican…is simply wrong. Make up your minds. Ante up, or cash out.

Most of all – I’m sick of of a few key things that I must now detail:

*Being told that being conservative means you must also behave a certain way, when it comes to religion. The last time I checked, there was this thing called “freedom OF religion” in this country, and it is MY choice as to whether I wear a cross around my neck or not. It is MY choice as to whether I speak 24/7 about my religious beliefs, or not. It is MY choice as to how I use my religious beliefs to gauge potential political candidates…or not. Being politically conservative means alot of things, but I’m tired of being told that being politically conservative comes with a mandatory list of religious methodology that one must follow, if they are to be accepted as “conservative” or “Christian enough” to even be considered “conservative”. To suggest that a person must believe a certain way when it comes to religion, all because they are politically conservative…Isn’t smart. This is where that “individual freedom” comes in. Respect it, or it will eventually become an albatross around your neck.

*Being told that I’m a “jew lover”, and don’t love my own country, because I believe we must maintain our alliance with Israel. The people who say things like this need a swift kick in the ass, as far as I’m concerned. Take a look at the middle east, and name for me all the countries we can call “ally”. And don’t give me the “U.S.S. Liberty”/”Powerful Jew Lobby” BS. There are other countries besides Israel who’ve done as much, or more, and I find it funny we never hear you people standing up and crying about that when it happens. It’s always all about Israel and the Jews. Get a life…and put down the copy of “Mein Kampf”.

*Being told that I must “give a little” when it comes to core conservative ideals. No, I don’t have to “give a little”!
I don’t find that embracing the political opposition’s ideals or stances does anything to further the conservative movement or cause. It only makes things politically “murky” and indistinguishable. That creates confusion, and we have enough of that already. Pardon me for having a backbone and sticking to those core ideals. I don’t plan on waivering on those things, ever, and if it means that I re-register as “Libertarian” or “Independent”, then so be it. My advice to these folks – educate yourself on what conservatism TRULY is, and go from there. Start fresh, because you’re thinking as been muddied by a liberal media hell-bent on brainwashing you.

In the end,….Individualism seems to have flown out the window within the GOP. They seem not to respect the fact that PEOPLE are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights….Not “political parties” are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights”.

My advice to the party as a whole? Decide whether you still believe in the core conservative ideals (lower taxes, less government, more individual freedom).
If you do, make those things the only litmus test that matters, because in the end, those things that most so-called “moderates” want to be flexible on and the things that most so-called “social conservatives” believe are more important would ALL fall under the “individual freedom” category. In my book, that’s how it should be.

Talismen on May 19, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Hey! Ho! Steele’s gotta go!

I R A Darth Aggie on May 19, 2009 at 9:59 AM

What’s interesting is that Blackwell is much more conservative than Steele but he couldn’t prevail in the election which tells me that conservatives should first win elections than keep moaning about injustices of the world.

promachus on May 19, 2009 at 6:49 AM

What it tells me was that people were more familiar with Steele–who is a bit of a media star–than they were with Blackwell.

Guess what? This morning it is being reported that Steele is resisting a comptroller for the organization. Says it would make him a figure head. More to follow.

baldilocks on May 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Steele has pablum for a core.

We need someone with steel.

profitsbeard on May 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM

That will seal your party’s fate for many elections to come. Angry moderates will start a new partycloser to the middle and you’ll split the vote and the Dems will laugh and laugh and laugh.

Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 7:48 AM

If that’s so, you should be happy. So why are you here sneering? Happy people don’t sneer.

baldilocks on May 19, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Talismen on May 19, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Are you hearing this, or infering it?

Howsabout if everyone argues hard for his position, and tries to elect people that most represent it?

Akzed on May 19, 2009 at 11:48 AM

Angry moderates will start a new partycloser to the middle and you’ll split the vote and the Dems will laugh and laugh and laugh. Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 7:48 AM

Yes, those fire-in-the-belly mods.

Hey, didn’t you get the bum’s rush outa here some weeks back?!

Akzed on May 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM

Why are we all talking around the obvious? Michael Steele is dumb.

Potfry on May 19, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Nobody is talking about “narrowing the message” or kicking out moderates. That´s a giant strawman. We all realize there are states where you cannot run hardline conservatives.

But we have every right to expect a spokesman who can sell the party as it is, including conservative positions. Any spokesman who looks embarrassed talking about his product is simply unprofessional. If he cannot take his own side in a debate, he is the wrong guy for the job. Nothing personal; I still think Steele is a good guy. Just not good at this.

I don´t see the so-called blue dog Democrats distancing themselves loudly from Obama´s hard-left appointments or calling for David Axelrod´s head because he´s driving moderates away or calling Biden an embarrassment. They never claim that “the Democrat party left me” and predict that the hard left will ruin the party for centrist voters. They did not do it even when the Dems were losing. And the one or two Democrats who dissented, like Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman, caught hell pour encourager les autres.

They live by the motto “No enemies on the left.”
Steele would do well to remember that.

el gordo on May 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Why are we all talking around the obvious? Michael Steele is dumb.

Potfry on May 19, 2009 at 12:54 PM

It seems that he’s pretty well able to speak. If you mean to allege that he is stupid, no that’s not obvious. He is like many in the GOP who haven’t thought through what they believe in or are too scared to confront the Left on conservative terms.

baldilocks on May 19, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Angry moderates

Dave Rywall on May 19, 2009 at 7:48 AM

ROFL…the very look of that phrase is funny.

ddrintn on May 19, 2009 at 5:10 PM

He is like many in the GOP who haven’t thought through what they believe in or are too scared to confront the Left on conservative terms.

baldilocks on May 19, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Invalid as of today’s speech.

baldilocks on May 19, 2009 at 7:21 PM

“How is kicking Colin Powell out or kicking Dick Cheney out or Rush Limbaugh in going to feed a child who’s hungry tonight?”

I got a good belly laugh when I read this comment.

This is high entertainment — high quality stand-up humor: Steele is a parody of himself.

sanantonian on May 19, 2009 at 11:22 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3