Axelrod “jokes”: Miss California’s a dog or something
posted at 2:47 pm on May 15, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
He can’t possibly mean this the way it sounds. I realize Team Obama has its own brand of Newspeak — terrorist attacks are “man-caused disasters,” spending increases are “budget cuts,” etc. — but not even a partisan svengali as dedicated as Ax is going to convince the public that Carrie Prejean’s a dog.
When Axelrod was asked if he had weighed in on the Obama family’s dog choice, “the Rasputin in this kingdom” (as Sagal jokingly refered to him) sassed back, “I was only called in for the final three, and one was Miss California.”
Quoth Jeri Thompson, “Way to be a sexist pig. Thanks, David!” In fairness, I think all he was doing is reaching for a funny topical reference related to judging and this pitiful name-check was the best he could do. Or maybe, given the White House’s knack for picking fights with non-politicians like Rush and Rick Santelli, he was driven to goof on her through simple force of habit. Whichever it is, it’s interesting that this seems to be derisive and yet the only reason a liberal like him would have for disliking her is that she has the same view on marriage — supposedly — as his pal Barry. This may be the best clue yet that The One’s faking.
Update: Oh, almost forgot: The National Organization for Marriage is a “hate group,” according to the very conscientious ex-director of the California pageant. I wonder how she feels about having a hatemonger in the White House. Hard times, America.
Update: In the comments, Omri Ceren of Mere Rhetoric puts it more eloquently.
I don’t think it’s as complicated as “topical namecheck.” Miss CA is just this week’s Designated Hate Target, so she gets bundled into every leftist joke that requires an “insert demeaning reference here” punchline. The sexist overtones are just part and parcel of the Obama boys club, where a robust lack of respect for women goes back to the Dem primaries. They needed to develop a culture of antipathy for Clinton, so they reached for the most readily available tropes. Fast forward a few months and you’ve got speech writers groping cutouts of Clinton. A few months after that, and Ax is calling Prejean a dog. The sexist tropes are *reflexive* for these tools.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
Maybe it’s my weak little girl brain, but wouldn’t you think that a woman who fought the establishment to achieve political success (even 75% of Democrats in Alaska gave Gov. Palin high approval ratings) is actually pretty smart?
Obviously, liberals are out to destroy any woman whose very existence decimates the ad hominem attacks used against conservatives. Liberals do more to trash on women’s brains than does Larry Summers. (Wait, he’s a liberal man in the Obama administration, too? Strange.)
Roxeanne de Luca on May 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Strangely, the liberal definition of “hot” with regards to women is often synonymous with “masculine.” We see this with everyone from Michelle Obama to the hirsute and Rubenesque ladies of Code Pink.
Conservative women look like women. Yes, we have breasts and long hair and pretty nails and wear skirts. That’s the fun of being a girl.
Roxeanne de Luca on May 15, 2009 at 9:53 PM
Hawkdriver! Hope you are having a good day!
http://media.monstersandcritics.com/galleries/1733565/0172800355085.jpg
The universe is great, and each of us is so small. It’s good to have people one can rely upon to watch our backs. Thanks.
Loxodonta on May 16, 2009 at 2:24 AM
Axelrod looks like the sterotypical lech who would be behind the counter at a run-down porno shop. Anyone else agree?
He probably referred to Carrie as a dog because of his latent fantasy of being able to pet her and having her lick his face.
But then again, aren’t most of us guys down with that? Giggity, giggity, giggity. OH!
OlympicLeprechaun on May 16, 2009 at 9:27 AM
Of course, we know that Obama’s opposition to gay marriage is very shallow and apt to change at a single polls notice. I don’t get why you and Ed bother to pretend that everyone doesn’t know this. This silly act about Obama’s gay marriage stance is getting old.
I had the chance yesterday to ask some politically gay Democrats what they thought of Obama’s stance on gay marriage. They said Obama’s opposition was just expedience, and that Obama would not veto any gay positive measure passed by Congress.
thuja on May 16, 2009 at 9:48 AM
Busted Axelrod would fit in great with faggots Pissy Crissy, Keith Overbite, and vomit Shuster crowd at MSNBC.
byteshredder on May 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Please be aware that the CA125 blood test is not necessarily an accurate tool for diagnosing ovarian cancer. (I had my first one last year & it was high, which resulted in lots of other tests). It can indicate something but also comes up with false positives & false negatives. Make sure they do a good ultrasound, etc… if you are really concerned. Hope everything turns out OK!
kg598301 on May 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM
We have come a long way from the “Tailhook Scandal”. Where is Sen. Ferraro? Where are the Feminists? I guess trashing white women in public is no longer a crime. Of course, after the Silence about Monica and the rape of Broaddrick I should have realized it is all political expediency. Just like Obama’s support for Homosexuals. A change in political wind, and it will vanish like snow on the desert face.
GunRunner on May 16, 2009 at 8:07 PM
For simple weight gain? And before you said you were pregnant? On a political blog?
Get tested for Munchausen syndrome
GunRunner on May 16, 2009 at 8:13 PM
lorien1973 on May 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM
guido911 on May 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM
You and me both! LOL
byteshredder on May 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Not even Rachel Maddog would touch him . . . With a ten foot pole.
Ryan Gandy on May 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM
All I can say is “DUDE! WTF?!”
I can’t believe he would even try and go there!
Guess class is not one of Axelrod’s attributes.
Still waiting for the liberal feminists groups to condemn this statement. **crickets chirping**
sarahpalinfan99 on May 18, 2009 at 4:19 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3