<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIP Column: Was Porkulus irrelevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Romer spins the unemployment rise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2663202</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Romer spins the unemployment rise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2663202</guid>
		<description>[...] Romer spins so hard in this segment that it deserves its own thread. Nowhere do we hear that Romer predicted an unemployment rate below 8% if the Obama administration got its $787 billion stimulus package, and in fact, Romer talks about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Romer spins so hard in this segment that it deserves its own thread. Nowhere do we hear that Romer predicted an unemployment rate below 8% if the Obama administration got its $787 billion stimulus package, and in fact, Romer talks about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drip, Drip, Drip</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2407812</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drip, Drip, Drip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2407812</guid>
		<description>[...] debate and negotiation, to adopt their recommendations in order to avoid a spike in unemployment in the near term. They got what they wanted, a spending plan that funded just about every liberal fantasy of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debate and negotiation, to adopt their recommendations in order to avoid a spike in unemployment in the near term. They got what they wanted, a spending plan that funded just about every liberal fantasy of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stimulus fizzle has Democrats worried</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2407212</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stimulus fizzle has Democrats worried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2407212</guid>
		<description>[...] debate and negotiation, to adopt their recommendations in order to avoid a spike in unemployment in the near term.  They got what they wanted &#8212; a spending plan that funded just about every liberal fantasy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debate and negotiation, to adopt their recommendations in order to avoid a spike in unemployment in the near term.  They got what they wanted &#8212; a spending plan that funded just about every liberal fantasy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Morrissey: 600,00 New Stimulus Jobs? &#124; The Kansas Progress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2307078</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey: 600,00 New Stimulus Jobs? &#124; The Kansas Progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2307078</guid>
		<description>[...] sure, just like Christine Romer predicted that Porkulus would prevent unemployment from hitting a stratospheric 8.8%.  And, of course, it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sure, just like Christine Romer predicted that Porkulus would prevent unemployment from hitting a stratospheric 8.8%.  And, of course, it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama: Get ready for 600,000 new stimulus jobs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2280175</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama: Get ready for 600,000 new stimulus jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2280175</guid>
		<description>[...] sure, just like Christine Romer predicted that Porkulus would prevent unemployment from hitting a stratospheric 8.8%.  And, of course, it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sure, just like Christine Romer predicted that Porkulus would prevent unemployment from hitting a stratospheric 8.8%.  And, of course, it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment up to 9.4%</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2273160</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment up to 9.4%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2273160</guid>
		<description>[...] A month ago, I asked in an AIP column whether Porkulus was irrelevant, considering the lack of response to unemployment.  Dr. Christine Romer prepared the administration&#8217;s battle plan in January  to get a massive stimulus plan in place immediately after taking office, and the economic adviser to President Obama warned of massive unemployment without the stimulus.  In fact, she predicted it could crest at 8.8% if no action was taken (page 5): The U.S. economy has already lost nearly 2.6 million jobs since the business cycle peak in December 2007. In the absence of stimulus, the economy could lose another 3 to 4 million more. Thus, we are working to counter a potential total job loss of at least 5 million. As Figure 1 shows, even with the large prototypical package, the unemployment rate in 2010Q4 is predicted to be approximately 7.0 percent, which is well below the approximately 8.8 percent that would result in the absence of a plan. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A month ago, I asked in an AIP column whether Porkulus was irrelevant, considering the lack of response to unemployment.  Dr. Christine Romer prepared the administration&#8217;s battle plan in January  to get a massive stimulus plan in place immediately after taking office, and the economic adviser to President Obama warned of massive unemployment without the stimulus.  In fact, she predicted it could crest at 8.8% if no action was taken (page 5): The U.S. economy has already lost nearly 2.6 million jobs since the business cycle peak in December 2007. In the absence of stimulus, the economy could lose another 3 to 4 million more. Thus, we are working to counter a potential total job loss of at least 5 million. As Figure 1 shows, even with the large prototypical package, the unemployment rate in 2010Q4 is predicted to be approximately 7.0 percent, which is well below the approximately 8.8 percent that would result in the absence of a plan. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2209956</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2209956</guid>
		<description>I think that porkulus is working.  It is doing just as the new deal did for FDR, that is it prolonged the crummy economy and kept the indespensible man, FDR, in office.  It may have already started to work by increasing unemployment beyond the nonstimulus projection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that porkulus is working.  It is doing just as the new deal did for FDR, that is it prolonged the crummy economy and kept the indespensible man, FDR, in office.  It may have already started to work by increasing unemployment beyond the nonstimulus projection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2209594</link>
		<dc:creator>landlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2209594</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Porkulus will go down in history as &quot;&lt;em&gt;The Ultimate Corruption&lt;/em&gt;&quot;.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Porkulus will go down in history as &#8220;<em>The Ultimate Corruption</em>&#8220;.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207867</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207867</guid>
		<description>Amen, hawksrulevea.  Porkulus takes money from the private sector and funnels it to public sector.  The more public sector employees, the less likely we&#039;ll ever get enough voters to roll this back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, hawksrulevea.  Porkulus takes money from the private sector and funnels it to public sector.  The more public sector employees, the less likely we&#8217;ll ever get enough voters to roll this back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawksruleva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207844</link>
		<dc:creator>hawksruleva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207844</guid>
		<description>Uhh, porkulus was about funneling money to unions and other Democratic allies. Saying otherwise was just spin for the cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh, porkulus was about funneling money to unions and other Democratic allies. Saying otherwise was just spin for the cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dIb</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207777</link>
		<dc:creator>dIb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207777</guid>
		<description>Hey, just a general question, but what part of the red triangle should I look at to see exactly where the March and April data is on the graph?  I&#039;d like to send this around.  Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just a general question, but what part of the red triangle should I look at to see exactly where the March and April data is on the graph?  I&#8217;d like to send this around.  Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207717</link>
		<dc:creator>ironman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207717</guid>
		<description>Quoting, well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2009/05/pouring-taxpayer-money-down-drain.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;myself&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;We would have to say that at this time, it would seem the stimulus plan&#039;s system of directing large amounts of federal tax dollars to the biggest campaign contributors of the majority party of Congress and the Obama administration, rather than toward productive Americans, doesn&#039;t appear to be working very well. One might conclude that the wasteful spending is producing results little different than pouring the money down the drain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And then I go on to briefly summarize Barack Obama&#039;s history of wasteful spending and exceptionally poor judgment in fiscal matters....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting, well, <a href="http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2009/05/pouring-taxpayer-money-down-drain.html" rel="nofollow">myself</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We would have to say that at this time, it would seem the stimulus plan&#8217;s system of directing large amounts of federal tax dollars to the biggest campaign contributors of the majority party of Congress and the Obama administration, rather than toward productive Americans, doesn&#8217;t appear to be working very well. One might conclude that the wasteful spending is producing results little different than pouring the money down the drain.</p></blockquote>
<p>And then I go on to briefly summarize Barack Obama&#8217;s history of wasteful spending and exceptionally poor judgment in fiscal matters&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weebork</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207677</link>
		<dc:creator>Weebork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207677</guid>
		<description>We were heading towards a depression regardless of the massive spending by the Feds over the last, let&#039;s say, year. We were already in massive debt before TARP, et al were passed/used. Private sector debt (e.g. credit cards, housing) is in the tens of trillions of dollars, nevermind the federal deficit. All the recent massive spending has done is prolonged when we recover from a generational depression. We&#039;ll survive as a country, because we&#039;re America, but what the country will look like then when we do is unknowable at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were heading towards a depression regardless of the massive spending by the Feds over the last, let&#8217;s say, year. We were already in massive debt before TARP, et al were passed/used. Private sector debt (e.g. credit cards, housing) is in the tens of trillions of dollars, nevermind the federal deficit. All the recent massive spending has done is prolonged when we recover from a generational depression. We&#8217;ll survive as a country, because we&#8217;re America, but what the country will look like then when we do is unknowable at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregbert</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207655</link>
		<dc:creator>gregbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207655</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ve got Porkulus Flu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve got Porkulus Flu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notagool</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207623</link>
		<dc:creator>notagool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207623</guid>
		<description>Great column and analysis Ed!

Not that it will make any difference.

The Obomabots will never hear about the dismal failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great column and analysis Ed!</p>
<p>Not that it will make any difference.</p>
<p>The Obomabots will never hear about the dismal failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluelightbrigade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207621</link>
		<dc:creator>bluelightbrigade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207621</guid>
		<description>I just hope it&#039;s not irrelevant in 2010 and 2012.

/justsayin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope it&#8217;s not irrelevant in 2010 and 2012.</p>
<p>/justsayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207598</link>
		<dc:creator>logis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What I don’t get is this consensus over 2012 being the year where things begin to improve. Why is it 2012? Why not 2013 or 2016?  ...(Also, for credibility, did these same individuals see the current economic downturn ahead of time before it became rather obvious?)
Weebork on May 14, 2009 at 1:01 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A better question is:  how many of them can predict what new trillion-dollar confiscation of private funds will Obama announce TOMORROW.

As for the long-term crystal ball gazing:  It&#039;s like predicting the weather; if you try to guess more than a week in advance, they just go by the historical average.  You&#039;re better off with a Magic Eight Ball.

Liberal theologists have conclusively decreed that the five and a half quadrillion tons of gases in the earth&#039;s atmosphere are going to be thrown permanently out of whack by an additional 0.000000001% carbon dioxide.

Oh, but a doubling of permanent non-discretionary federal spending in the first three months of this year, plus additional allocations equal to (so far) ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of last year&#039;s GDP?

Don&#039;t worry, that&#039;ll just cause a little blip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What I don’t get is this consensus over 2012 being the year where things begin to improve. Why is it 2012? Why not 2013 or 2016?  &#8230;(Also, for credibility, did these same individuals see the current economic downturn ahead of time before it became rather obvious?)<br />
Weebork on May 14, 2009 at 1:01 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>A better question is:  how many of them can predict what new trillion-dollar confiscation of private funds will Obama announce TOMORROW.</p>
<p>As for the long-term crystal ball gazing:  It&#8217;s like predicting the weather; if you try to guess more than a week in advance, they just go by the historical average.  You&#8217;re better off with a Magic Eight Ball.</p>
<p>Liberal theologists have conclusively decreed that the five and a half quadrillion tons of gases in the earth&#8217;s atmosphere are going to be thrown permanently out of whack by an additional 0.000000001% carbon dioxide.</p>
<p>Oh, but a doubling of permanent non-discretionary federal spending in the first three months of this year, plus additional allocations equal to (so far) ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of last year&#8217;s GDP?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, that&#8217;ll just cause a little blip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update on how &#8220;well&#8221; the porkulus is working for America &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207568</link>
		<dc:creator>Update on how &#8220;well&#8221; the porkulus is working for America &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207568</guid>
		<description>[...] example of how well the porkulus is working out: Dead people are getting money from the stimulus. Millions of Americans on Social Security are receiving $250 checks as part of the BS stimulus including a woman named  Anne Arundel woman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] example of how well the porkulus is working out: Dead people are getting money from the stimulus. Millions of Americans on Social Security are receiving $250 checks as part of the BS stimulus including a woman named  Anne Arundel woman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlines</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207542</link>
		<dc:creator>landlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207542</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course Porkulus was not irrelevant.
It was the vehicle by which 100’s of billions of dollars were passed from the taxpayer to various Democratic constituencies. Both as a reward for past loyalties and as seed money to make sure that they are even more effective at distorting the political landscape in the future.

MarkTheGreat on May 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...AND destroying the credibility of the U.S. dollar in the world&#039;s markets.  Porkulus also caused China to cancel our credit card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course Porkulus was not irrelevant.<br />
It was the vehicle by which 100’s of billions of dollars were passed from the taxpayer to various Democratic constituencies. Both as a reward for past loyalties and as seed money to make sure that they are even more effective at distorting the political landscape in the future.</p>
<p>MarkTheGreat on May 14, 2009 at 1:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;AND destroying the credibility of the U.S. dollar in the world&#8217;s markets.  Porkulus also caused China to cancel our credit card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zmdavid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207522</link>
		<dc:creator>zmdavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207522</guid>
		<description>I doubt very much that unemployment is going to be 5% by 2014 absent a major WWII-esque war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt very much that unemployment is going to be 5% by 2014 absent a major WWII-esque war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limerick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207506</link>
		<dc:creator>Limerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207506</guid>
		<description>Oh it&#039;ll be relevant. Come 2012 the voting lines will double as bread lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it&#8217;ll be relevant. Come 2012 the voting lines will double as bread lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Economy: Reality and Repercussions &#124; NEOAVATARA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207500</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Economy: Reality and Repercussions &#124; NEOAVATARA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207500</guid>
		<description>[...] by Mr. Obama&#8217;s economic team, and actually correspond with the exact numbers predicted if we had never passed the stimulus plan in the first place.  Glad to hear that the almost $800 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Mr. Obama&#8217;s economic team, and actually correspond with the exact numbers predicted if we had never passed the stimulus plan in the first place.  Glad to hear that the almost $800 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207486</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What I don’t get is this consensus over 2012 being the year where things begin to improve. Why is it 2012? Why not 2013 or 2016? What sort of reasoning is behind many so-called analysts predicting 2012 is the end of bad economic times and the beginning of prosperity?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aw, that&#039;s an easy one! Big Brother Barry, up for re-election, gets to take credit for the improvement! In the meantime, people are supposed to forget three years of recession, or blame it on Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What I don’t get is this consensus over 2012 being the year where things begin to improve. Why is it 2012? Why not 2013 or 2016? What sort of reasoning is behind many so-called analysts predicting 2012 is the end of bad economic times and the beginning of prosperity?</p></blockquote>
<p>Aw, that&#8217;s an easy one! Big Brother Barry, up for re-election, gets to take credit for the improvement! In the meantime, people are supposed to forget three years of recession, or blame it on Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZCoyote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207485</link>
		<dc:creator>AZCoyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207485</guid>
		<description>The massive &quot;stimulus&quot; pork spending wasn&#039;t &quot;irrelevant&quot; to Obama&#039;s desire to be re-elected in 2012.  Those billions of dollars to Obama&#039;s base (unions, ACORN, etc.) were meant to serve a purpose, and they will.  Just because that purpose is completely different from the one that was sold to the public to justify the massive spending doesn&#039;t make it &quot;irrelevant&quot;-- &quot;underhanded,&quot; &quot;unethical,&quot; &quot;criminally negligent,&quot; perhaps, but certainly not &quot;irrelevant.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The massive &#8220;stimulus&#8221; pork spending wasn&#8217;t &#8220;irrelevant&#8221; to Obama&#8217;s desire to be re-elected in 2012.  Those billions of dollars to Obama&#8217;s base (unions, ACORN, etc.) were meant to serve a purpose, and they will.  Just because that purpose is completely different from the one that was sold to the public to justify the massive spending doesn&#8217;t make it &#8220;irrelevant&#8221;&#8211; &#8220;underhanded,&#8221; &#8220;unethical,&#8221; &#8220;criminally negligent,&#8221; perhaps, but certainly not &#8220;irrelevant.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbear44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/14/aip-column-was-porkulus-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-2207481</link>
		<dc:creator>tbear44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=53020#comment-2207481</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Was Porkulus irrelevant?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Ya think? Maybe not to OBAMACORN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Was Porkulus irrelevant?</p></blockquote>
<p>Ya think? Maybe not to OBAMACORN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
