Outrageous outrage: Miss California modeled lingerie for E!

posted at 7:41 pm on May 12, 2009 by Allahpundit

It’s late-breaking and connected to the big story of the day, which means the sheer momentous news value of it practically obliges me to post. A serious question hidden among the cheesecake here: Have we determined in the comments yet whether it’s “un-Christian” to pose nearly nude? That’s the clear subtext of the left’s obsession with finding risque photos of her, to play up her alleged hypocrisy, but lingerie photos are a Biblical gray area as far as I know. My hunch is that it might turn on whether your pose is likely to inspire lust, one of the seven deadly sins. In which case, I’ll see you in hell, Carrie.

Ladies, if you’re looking for some equal-time beefcake, I’d remind you that we posted a clip of Dick Cheney just two days ago.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

That Sinner!!!

Firebird on May 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM

Allah, I love you but hate you at the same time. Love you for this post, but hate you because I really need to finish my hw and this not helping! =)

Weebork on May 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM

I like her.

therightwinger on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM

dayum.

Patriot33 on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM

The Left only considers you a “real” Christian if you dress like a Bedouin woman and spend your life making Bible covers or something. Anything more risque is UNGODLY!!!

Speedwagon82 on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Miss California Organization PSA “I Believe”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay7GaRETDNg

BJ on May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM

“Hard day at the office” = LOL!!!

izoneguy on May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM

Ladies, if you’re looking for some equal-time beefcake, I’d remind you that we posted a clip of Dick Cheney just two days ago.

While Dick Cheney has good qualities, I never tire of a picture of Benjamin Netanyahu.

sherry on May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM

Allah, I have a request…every time you post about megan (moooo) mccain could you post ms. CA’s picture??

nice heels…and everything else..

right4life on May 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM

Consider it cleansed.

Jaibones on May 12, 2009 at 7:50 PM

There penises and vaginas all over Renaissance Christian art – stuff the church commissioned.

The question isn’t nudity, the question is whether it’s going to generate prurient interest.

foucaultsvac on May 12, 2009 at 7:50 PM

Sure, the palate is cleansed, but the mind is sooo dirty.

trubble on May 12, 2009 at 7:51 PM

A serious question hidden among the cheesecake here: Have we determined in the comments yet whether it’s “un-Christian” to pose nearly nude? That’s the clear subtext of the left’s obsession with finding risque photos of her, to play up her alleged hypocrisy, but lingerie photos are a Biblical gray area as far as I know.

I think the only proper response to the left worrying about whether something is “un-Christian” or not is:

STFU

Seriously, just STFU.

You (those on the left worrying about this) never cared about Biblical values before, especially if it got in the way of doing something that “felt good” to you.

You didn’t care about the Biblical values concerning abortion.

And you certainly didn’t care about the Biblical values concerning homosexuality and gay marriage.

So we’re not buying this faux concern.

I’m not even going to discuss the theological aspects of it because not only aren’t you interested in it, you wouldn’t understand it.

Just STFU and go away.

Religious_Zealot on May 12, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Allah… GOOD FOR YOU! This is a “normal” crush!

upinak on May 12, 2009 at 7:51 PM

Good thing she wasn’t in a swimsuit. That would really be racy.

LibTired on May 12, 2009 at 7:52 PM

Miss Rhode Island posed for Maxim.

Y-not on May 12, 2009 at 7:52 PM

Is she on Twitter yet?

JammieWearingFool on May 12, 2009 at 7:52 PM

Nice cheesecake desert, thanks.

It’s a nasty job. Someone’s got to do it. :)

BottomLine5 on May 12, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Boy they aren’t very bright are they. All they are doing is making her look more and more mainstream rather than some Religious crazy.

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Sigh…Too bad she would just have to dump me anyway thanks to Pat Robertson.

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 7:53 PM

…megan (moooo) mccain…

right4life on May 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM

That’s childish and stupid.

Tzetzes on May 12, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Heh. Hard day at the office.

JammieWearingFool on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM

While Dick Cheney has good qualities, I never tire of a picture of Benjamin Netanyahu.

sherry on May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM

Or Nicolas Sarkozy. God is he pretty!

Knucklehead on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM

Dick Cheney is so hot.

BadgerHawk on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM

Model caught modeling. This is news why?

Amadeus on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM

Meghan’s going to twit she wants to scratch some blonde’s eyes out because she’s stolen her beta-male blogger.

Marcus on May 12, 2009 at 7:55 PM

Definitely THE most successful runner up EVAH! Good job Gay Troopers!

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 7:55 PM

Charlie Crist was supposed to be outed last week…what happened? Miss California happened, that’s what!

SouthernGent on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

“lingerie photos are a Biblical gray area as far as I know”

I suppose I could look it up, but if I remember correctly, the seventh chapter of Leviticus is all about appropriate and inappropriate photography.

notropis on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasp!

rollthedice on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

To the Left: Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. She answered a question. Period. Kneepad boy shouldn’t have asked it if he thought he might not like the answer.

The left can tee her up all they want. Christ was criticized for hanging around with notorious sinners. I’d love to be in her company.

BuckeyeSam on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

Immoral wench!

God Almighty, she’s so damn beautiful though!

True_King on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

I find it hilarious that the left actually doesn’t care that she was showing some skin, just that she has values.

She has standards!! BURN HER AT THE STAKE!!!!

portlandon on May 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Definitely THE most successful runner up EVAH! Good job Gay Troopers!

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 7:55 PM

Not very bright are they. Now they are making her look pretty mainstream rather than some religious zealot. Their hatred blinds them…

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM

My hunch is that it might turn on whether your pose is likely to inspire lust, one of the seven deadly sins. In which case, I’ll see you in hell, Carrie.

You’re correct.

However, the neat thing about sin when it comes to Christianity, is that if you repent of the sin you will be forgiven.

Which, of course, is the thing that these lefties don’t understand.

Whether or not what Miss Prejean did was a sin, Miss Prejean, like every other person on earth, is a sinner.

That doesn’t make her un-Christian (or a hypocrite)…

…it makes her human.

Religious_Zealot on May 12, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Also, I think she should be cast in the next X-Men movie. She’s appealing.

portlandon on May 12, 2009 at 7:58 PM

The left knows no end to hypocrisy. You see that at the beach any day except in the swimsuit version.

Mojave Mark on May 12, 2009 at 7:58 PM

Definitely THE most successful runner up EVAH! Good job Gay Troopers!

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 7:55 PM

Who won again?????

portlandon on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM

Model caught modeling. This is news why?

Amadeus on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 PM

I said something similar a while ago…

…the whole point of the left’s attack seems to be that we Christians and conservatives should cut her loose because…

…well, because she’s SEXY!!!!!!11!!eleventy

Yeah, good game plan there.

Religious_Zealot on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM

Who won again?????

portlandon on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM

I honestly don’t have a clue.

Knucklehead on May 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM

Hey Allah, you know that sin doesn’t send a person to hell…eh?

Its the rejection of Jesus Christ that sends someone to hell. If we have made covenant with him and his blood covers our sin, they we will be with him in Heaven as He is with us now.

Otherwise…well, I hate to even consider otherwise.

therightscoop on May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM

Who won again?????

portlandon on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM

We did obviously. Now we get to see her gifts on a regular basis!

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM

I think we will owe Miss California alot. She is about to make Allah become a believer.

William Amos on May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM

Remember boys and girls,

the co-executive director of the Miss California USA pageant is a former Playboy Bunny.

The irony and hypocrisy doesn’t get much thicker then that!

Religious_Zealot on May 12, 2009 at 8:02 PM

thought love was only true in fairy tales
Meant for someone else but not for me.
Love was out to get me
That’s the way it seemed.
Disappointment haunted all my dreams.

Then I saw her face, now I’m a believer
Not a trace of doubt in my mind.
I’m in love, I’m a believer!
I couldn’t leave her if I tried.

I think we will owe Miss California alot. She is about to make Allah become a believer.

William Amos on May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM

I thought love was more or less a given thing,
Seems the more I gave the less I got.
What’s the use in tryin’?
All you get is pain.
When I needed sunshine I got rain.

Then I saw her face, now I’m a believer
Not a trace of doubt in my mind.
I’m in love, I’m a believer!
I couldn’t leave her if I tried

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:03 PM

I

honestly don’t have a clue.

Knucklehead on May 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM

I think it was Miss North Carolina and yes, Sarkozy does it for me too.

sherry on May 12, 2009 at 8:04 PM

Im sure Miss California has a nice set of brains.

Yeah brains. I love her for her brains.

William Amos on May 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM

Adam and Eve were naked. It was MAN that had a problem with nudity.

Guardian on May 12, 2009 at 8:05 PM

uh… ah…. er…. other than the video not being 20 mintues long, I fail to see the problem.

Hog Wild on May 12, 2009 at 8:06 PM

Enough of Miss California ………… please, let it come to an end!

SC.Charlie on May 12, 2009 at 8:09 PM

The Left only considers you a “real” Christian if you dress like a Bedouin woman and spend your life making Bible covers or something. Anything more risque is UNGODLY!!!

Speedwagon82 on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Even then, it`s cause for ridicule. You`re some kind of freak.

There is no winning with them.

ThePrez on May 12, 2009 at 8:09 PM

Ladies, if you’re looking for some equal-time beefcake, I’d remind you that we posted a clip of Dick Cheney just two days ago.

And don’t think we don’t appreciate it. Smart A$$.

Cindy Munford on May 12, 2009 at 8:10 PM

I must say though. That Allahpundit…he sure knows his audience.

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 8:10 PM

F*cking A’, man.

Jeeze

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM

MICHAEL PHELPS DOES NOT DESERVE THIS WOMAN

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM

Charlie Crist was supposed to be outed last week…what happened? Miss California happened, that’s what!

SouthernGent on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 PM

I knew it!

toliver on May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM

i’m outrageously aroused.

homesickamerican on May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM

i’m outrageously aroused.

homesickamerican on May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM

As you should be

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:13 PM

OK…I’m good…

Now, what was AP saying?

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:15 PM

best news of the day

jp on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM

MICHAEL PHELPS DOES NOT DESERVE THIS WOMAN

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM

In the immortal words of William Money to Little Bill, “Deserves ain’t got notin’ to do with it.”

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM

She looks like Patrica Helfer… Six from BSG… :D

liquidflorian on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM

dayum.

Patriot33 on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Yeah, you pretty much summed it up!

Tim_B on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM

So let me see if I can follow the argument.

STATEMENT. She stated that she believes marriage is appropriate only between one man and one woman.

REBUTTAL. The press published partially nude photos of her and video of her in lingerie.

CONCLUSION. Therefore marriage is OK between two men or two women.

NEW QUESTION: If someone finds a picture of her fully nude does that mean that marriage is OK between people and farm animals or is it restricted to bigamy?

Mormon Doc on May 12, 2009 at 8:18 PM

I can not help but love her.

carbon_footprint on May 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM

In the immortal words of William Money to Little Bill, “Deserves ain’t got notin’ to do with it.”

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM

Good point

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM

SC Charlie; I disagree. This issue of morality needs continued, close examination.

michaelo on May 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM

In the case of Ms. Prejean, it would be deeply un-Christian not to pose near-nude.

CK MacLeod on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Sarah and Carrie 2012.

TXUS on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

you are now forgiven for posting a closeup of Janine Barfalo and Megan McShame…..

SDarchitect on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

It would take a gay boy to hate something like that now wouldnt it? eh their loss.

johnnyU on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

In the case of Ms. Prejean, it would be deeply un-Christian not to pose near-nude.

CK MacLeod on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Nary a statement as good as this has been uttered for quite some time.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:25 PM

In the case of Ms. Prejean, it would be deeply un-Christian not to pose near-nude.

CK MacLeod on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Yes she has a moral obligation to share with us all of the gifts God gave her…ALL…

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Yes she has a moral obligation to share with us all of the gifts God gave her…ALL…

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Sharing is caring, indeed.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Hahahaha! The whackjob leftwing commie pinkos are still bashing her in the comments over on E.

Blake on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

whew. now what was I doing again…

johnnyU on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Guess you missed the photo’s I saw of her boob escaping out the front of her “lingerie”. Or maybe this is just news that has not made it to your crack pot news desk yet?

Monkei on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Hahahaha! The whackjob leftwing commie pinkos are still bashing her in the comments over on E.

Blake on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Even the Lesbians? Surely they appreciate her gifts!

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Didn’t the Bible say something about not “hiding your bush under a little?” or summin?

ronsfi on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 PM

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Shouldn’t you be studying for finals this week? :-)

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Have we determined in the comments yet whether it’s “un-Christian” to pose nearly nude?

I’d say her intent in posing has more to do with how it affects her own relationship to her creator.

What other horn dogs do with it is their deal.

TheUnrepentantGeek on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Hahahaha! The whackjob leftwing commie pinkos are still bashing her in the comments over on E.

Blake on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM

They are just mad the only types they get to stick the trouser trout into are the Garafolo types.

And the women there are just mad they are the Garafolo types.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Shouldn’t you be studying for finals this week? :-)

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

As we speak!

Studying the “wonders” of supranationalism.

Joy.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

In the religious arena there are those that have to sin in order for others to get along in life. Some examples are the butcher that kills animals so others can have meat: the sin of the delivery truck driver bringing supplies to the Amish. Lingerie models fall into this category, a personal sacrifice to help the married husband find gifts for their wife.

gooddad on May 12, 2009 at 8:29 PM

Studying the “wonders” of supranationalism.

Joy.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 PM

It’s all Pure F’ing magic! The end.

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 PM

I would say that most lesbians are quite conflicted over this whole thing.

Mormon Doc on May 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Finally, a scandal I can get behind!

Scotsman on May 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM

gooddad on May 12, 2009 at 8:29 PM

My parish priest a long time ago said our bodies were God’s temples…

In Carrie’s case, now that is a temple…a truly remarkable temple.

In my case, more like a double-wide.

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM

It’s all Pure F’ing magic! The end.

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM

Supranationalism is a bunch of smoke and mirrors.

Churchill was right to be suspicious of it.

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Finally, a scandal I can get behind!

Scotsman on May 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Spoken like a true Scotsman, indeed.

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

I like, I like!

WisCon on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Christian women are hot. Sorry if that offends, but it’s true and it needed to be said. So there.

Bugler on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

“whether it’s “un-Christian” to pose nearly nude”

I’m pretty sure that God approves of Miss California.

And just as sure that God doesn’t approve of the contemptable Perez Hiltorn and wouldn’t approve of the slimebag even if he was heterosexual to the bone, instead of an excretable pervert.

notagool on May 12, 2009 at 8:33 PM

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

I just look for any excuse to use PFM…

TheBigOldDog on May 12, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Looks like she’s wearing more than a fig leaf? Answer your question, no?

saltydogg14 on May 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM

When is this chick’s 15 minutes gonna be up?

Cripes…she gets more attention than the Pope…

JetBoy on May 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM

JetBoy on May 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM

You want to see the Pope in lingerie?

Even by my low standards, that is just sick.

coldwarrior on May 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM

JetBoy on May 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Let a G get the ooglin’ time in!

blatantblue on May 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM

15 minutes?

http://www.polmachina.com/?p=141

ranchoforte on May 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Comment pages: 1 2