Your laugh of the day: the Citizens Briefing Book
posted at 6:45 pm on May 11, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
The introduction to this “citizens briefing book” is about the only coherent part of the publication. This comes from the feedback received at Change.gov, the website set up by the Obama administration as a means of giving feedback directly to the President. If anything, this book shows why a President needs a filtering organization to fend off the hoi polloi, as did his March virtual town hall, which used the same device and got the same data.
The introduction explains:
125,000 users submitted over 44,000 ideas and cast over 1.4 million votes, with the most popular ideas accumulating tens of thousands of votes each. This book contains some of the top ideas, broken into groups by issue area. You can tell how popular each idea was by looking at the number next to it – it represents how many people voted for the idea, with 10 points awarded for each positive vote. In addition, you will find a “word cloud” for each category of ideas representing the frequency with which various words and concepts appeared through the entire process.
Out of the tens of thousands of submissions, these ideas found the most support; here they are, unvarnished and unedited.
You can say “unedited” again, with gusto. The comment selected to represent “Reform the IRS and Stop the Tax Loopholes” (which received 32,840 points) had a recap of a Mother Jones article, with this endorsement at the end: “Please read the rest of the article. I am sure all his points can be verified with a little research.” In other words, the poster had no idea whether the article was right or not, but didn’t mind using it to support his argument. Classic.
The White House attempted to arrange these “ideas” into categories, but some of the assignments seem rather weak, while a catch-all category has its own revealing moments. For instance, under Service, the White House placed “Create an on-line E-library,” which might have been better suited for Technology. “Expand small business innovation programs” should have gone into the Economy category, which also probably should have gotten “A New Decentralized Energy Grid,” instead of Homeland Security — or at least that should have been in the Energy & Environment section.
The biggest vote-getter got stuck in the “Additional Issues” section, which as “Ending Marijuana Prohibition” with over 92,000 votes. A call to revoke Scientology’s tax-exempt status could have gone with the aforementioned tax-reform issue in the “Economy” category, but it looks like the White House was a little too embarrassed by it — despite it getting over 52,000 votes. But that’s no less embarrassing than the weird “word clouds” that head each section.
Be sure to read it all. You paid for it.
Update: Pay attention to the names on the comments. It seems like many of them are the same. One blogger at War is My Concern got 10 mentions in the Citizens Briefing Book. It seems that some citizens are more equal than others …
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
I type like crap.. but even I have someone look over my report and reviews for the problematic issues of my undeft fingers.
WOW!
upinak on May 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM
Allah, could you please post the Mike Lupica piece about the double standard with regards to Ms. Sykes?
Knucklehead on May 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM
kids with toys putting on a show of transparency and tech savvy hipness. Pathetic and we are paying in more then dollars for this.
rob verdi on May 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM
I’m e-mailing this to a couple of editors I know. I’m sure they will get a big laugh out of it.
Del Dolemonte on May 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Its the wikipedia of change and government.
William Amos on May 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM
So now we know why he flip flops…
Upstater85 on May 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM
Probably done by someone who got one of those 150,000 ‘jobs’ Obama ‘created’.
GarandFan on May 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM
…and as a means to get a great big database.
Other than getting names, this is nothing but an attempt to flatter the Useful Idiots into thinking Barack actually gives a flip about what the peasants think.
Buy Danish on May 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM
That’s all I need to know…
JetBoy on May 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM
I notice “marijuana” didn’t make it into any of the word clouds, despite getting more votes than anything else (and being slit into two categories!).
JohnJ on May 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM
I love how Israel is the biggest word in the Foreign Policy word cloud.
Emily M. on May 11, 2009 at 7:11 PM
What a bunch of dorks. Words spelled wrong, the goofier the idea, the more points it gets. Liberalism on parade.
Hey, I know: let’s brainwash elementary school kids to believe that all corporations are evil!
Jaibones on May 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM
I’ve never understood word clouds. But in a gov. report, they sure do prove to me tech-savvy presidential hipness.
/barf
laelaps on May 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Hey – and let’s legalize marijuana!
Jaibones on May 11, 2009 at 7:13 PM
What a sad testimonial that 52% of our electorate voted for a “word cloud” that inhaled.
Rovin on May 11, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Hugo Chavez does the same thing to distract the people from what he is really doing — Building them nice gulags.
Frankly I think freedom and liberty have it all over the alternatives.
tarpon on May 11, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Somebody (angroid, page 27) got it right:
RushBaby on May 11, 2009 at 7:17 PM
Well said.
RushBaby on May 11, 2009 at 7:18 PM
I’m just starting to read the “Citizen’s Briefing Book” but I got stopped at the introduction, where they explained about the weird transition from votes to points:
Huh? How about 1 point for each vote … and we could even call them “votes” instead of “points”? Would that be too easy and straight-forward?
I can’t wait to see how retarded the rest of this “Citizen’s Briefing Book” is. I have to say that the front inner cover with the little:
was barf-worthy in the extreme.
Oh well. It beats the ‘reset’ nuclear button we gave Russia that read ‘overcharged’, so I shouldn’t complain too much. Just prosecute the Traitor occupying the White House for treason and jail the rest of the junta and I’ll be fine.
progressoverpeace on May 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM
I know for a fact that this “book” is fake.
I ordered my Mounted Unicorn Battalions (Eleventy-million strong) to vote for better MSM treatment of the Enchanted Lands. I mean, it’s almost as if they don’t exist or something…..
It didn’t even get mentioned. Fake Fake Fake.
BobMbx on May 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM
Really? I could nitpick a lot out of that…starting with the fact that “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is in the Declaration of Independence.
Emily M. on May 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM
So, pretty much weed and online poker.
LOL
WisCon on May 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM
We must save this hilarious piece of 2009 kitsch. Something most of its contributors probably don’t realize, because they just haven’t lived long enough, is that it will look enbarrassingly silly a mere 2 years from now — forget even worrying about 10, 50, or 100.
J.E. Dyer on May 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM
There is something creepy when I hear “Citizen” used. In Star Trek the cop who pulls over Kirk calls him citizen. It makes it sound as if we are separate from the Government.
Howcome on May 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM
I wonder how many millions this book costed
the American taxpayer!
canopfor on May 11, 2009 at 7:32 PM
Hey, that is actually a great idea…you know, we could have a series of tubes that will go into each house and deliver information in digital form…and we can call it a cool name, you know, like…Internet or something, you know..?
ujorge on May 11, 2009 at 7:33 PM
Did “stop the practice of kitten juggling” get in there somewhere?
Neo on May 11, 2009 at 7:35 PM
refering to the populace of the country as citizen (the way this book does) has it’s roots in the French Revolution (Pre Jacobian). It was suposed to show that everyone is an equal citizen of the state. However, like the french revolution, I do not trust its use, especially by our betters. For some reason to me it rings too much of comrad.
cobrakai99 on May 11, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Oh and “word clouds” are a silly statistical smoke and mirrors concept that supposedly shows how popular a term is based on its relative size.
Of course the algorithm to make a word cloud can be rejiggered to produce any results you want based on the data set you give it.
Here’s a (technical) explanation of how one might “game” a word/tag cloud to exaggerate results:
http://www.echochamberproject.com/node/247
Neo on May 11, 2009 at 7:38 PM
So it’s a flawed jewel, nitpicker. It was included, and got more votes than most of the other stuff in there.
RushBaby on May 11, 2009 at 7:41 PM
I need to review the Bill Of Rights again. I wasn’t aware that a national WiFi network is required because access to the Internet should be a right for everyone.
What did we ever do before the Internet (Thanks Al Gore!!!).
Mo_mac on May 11, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Puh-leeez! Like I (or the Prez) give a hoot about what “warismyconcern” or any of these other boobs think!
This is as insane as the talking heads on Fox News or CNN wasting air time reading blog comments they’ve received from viewers. In fact it’s more insane, because my tax dollars paid for it. Grrrr…
KS Rex on May 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM
After further review, it appears that only one person was responsible for ALL of the issues in the Veteran’s section. That guy must be an oracle of some sorts to be that in touch with what everyone else is thinking!
Mo_mac on May 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM
I actually saw one that I agree with – A Do Not Mail registry to stop junk mail – sign me up!
Ann on May 11, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Is Hussein as thinks as he stoned he is?
christene on May 11, 2009 at 7:51 PM
Yeah, and you know whoever wrote it thinks Bush shredded the Constituition, and Obama’s gonna restore it. *eyeroll*. So, I’m not impressed.
Emily M. on May 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM
Could be a good concept, except a lot of people are very stupid.
Basically, they think that this is a way of being “heard”, but it’s just a ruse to keep people “feeling” hopey-changey, while the “adults” run the show.
bluelightbrigade on May 11, 2009 at 7:53 PM
Awesome.
myrenovations on May 11, 2009 at 7:54 PM
LOL, you could be right.
RushBaby on May 11, 2009 at 7:55 PM
Next: Brain Surgery by poll. “We should clamp off this artery. I don’t like the looks of it”.
Paul-Cincy on May 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM
In all seriousness, this is the reason why we are a Federal Republic, and not a Democracy.
BobMbx on May 11, 2009 at 8:03 PM
Universal suffrage is our undoing, fed. rep. or not.
JiangxiDad on May 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Yep.
lorien1973 on May 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM
It’s like grading on a scale of 1 to 10, except in some cases 1 can actually be the same as 10 if the unicorns come out to dance on the rainbows.
fogw on May 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM
If you want a coherent national plan, what better way to formulate one than to ask 125,000 citizens each to put in their 2 cents?
The result is chock full of hopey-changey goodness…
…and “word clouds” too!!
cruadin on May 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM
Another good reason to repeal the 17th Amendment.
JohnJ on May 11, 2009 at 8:19 PM
Or to invoke the 25th. Is Barack Hussein Obama of sound mind?
jeff_from_mpls on May 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM
A scary question, for the reason that a “sound mind” would surely be decided by a concensus of psychologists and/or psychiatrists, all from the best Ivy League schools, of course.
Need I go further?
Secondarily, if one President is somehow forced to undergo an assessment for a “sound mind”, why not all of them? To be fair, all assessments would be performed by guess who?
In the language of the Libtard, holding conservative beliefs and ideology is by default “unsound”.
BobMbx on May 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Well after reading the table of contents I have to call BS.
This is the Obama people lying their ass off again.
Maybe they could rename it the HuffKos Briefing Book.
More likely a creation of some starry-eyed, idiot Obama interns, under the supervision of some senior staffer.
Obama won’t pay attention to this anyway, but man – what a load of garbage and waste of money.
It does offer some insight into the minds of the fools now running the country, and also a look into the minds of the dimwits who offer their undying support.
This book is just downright embarassing. Was change/gov only accessable to elementary schools?
reaganaut on May 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM
Where do I get a refund?
jdkchem on May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM
Put me down in the call to revoke Mosques, CAIR, La Raza, ACLU and ACORNS tax-exempt status camp.
Oh! And to revoke what sure seems to be Tim Geithner and Tom Dashel’s at least semi tax-exempt status camp too.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the Kennedy’s and Al Gore have been using a lot of tax loop holes, so put me down in the “let’s investigate that” and close those loop holes and collect back taxes and penalties due camp too.
Oh, and I don’t want to forget all the things that Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and the Obama’s seem to have received under the table that they may not have paid the full tax on. BTW, with “received under the table” and Barney Frank – I didn’t mean “that”.
Did I forget anything?
MB4 on May 11, 2009 at 8:52 PM
I don’t know who wrote this or checked it, but they suck at English.
4shoes on May 11, 2009 at 8:55 PM
That list is pointless without knowing who voted for what.
For example, how many tax-payers voted to close loopholes?
OldEnglish on May 11, 2009 at 8:59 PM
Yes, they are not “people”.
OldEnglish on May 11, 2009 at 9:01 PM
On any given day he has at least two “sound minds”. Therein lies the main problem. The Strange Case of Professor Obama and Mr Hussein is a real life drama playing out in the aftermath of the Presidential election of 2008. It is about the dilemma of the American citizen who sees strange dissonances between the new found Messiah, Professor Obama, and the misanthropic Mr. Hussein. It is a vivid portrayal of a split personality, split in the sense that within the same person there is both an apparently good and an evil personality each being quite distinct from the other. In mainstream culture the very phrase “Obama and Hussien” will come to mean a person who’s words are vastly different in moral character from his actions.
Don’t listen to any of those upstart quacks! Everything they think they know they filtched from me and got most of that wrong.
Sigmund on May 11, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Hats off to your expertise. I can only see the one character.
OldEnglish on May 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM
In other words, 92,000 points is only 9,200 votes…. doesn’t sound that popular to me.
ArkCon on May 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM
i love the random capitalizations
Chiasmos on May 11, 2009 at 9:15 PM
Jeez. How much did we pay for this? The only good one was No Salary Increases for Congress.
ctmom on May 11, 2009 at 9:44 PM
So leftist unemployed community organizers (but I repeat, repeat, repeat myself) are going to be the shapers of our government?
Yep the adults are in charge now…the lazy stupid, unsuccessful adults.
jukin on May 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM
Math abuse, pure and simple. When you look at the total votes for each “idea” (to glorify them with the word ‘idea’ is to flatter that which is, to say the least, retarded as brilliant) the overall numbers aren’t that impressive. I mean, a total of 1.4 Million votes and 125,000 entries, and the best any one of the ideas got was 9297 votes? A measly 0.66% of the total number of votes? I suspect that when they put the “briefing book” together, they looked at the numbers they were claiming in the intro with the reality of the idea votes and said, “we can’t put those down like that, we’ll look more foolish than we already do” So somebody had the bright idea of multiplying by 10 to make the numbers look impressive.
Back before Scientific American became Politically Correct American, there was a brilliant column outlining what he called “math abuse”. This was defined as manipulating figures and graphs to substantiate the author’s point even if the data did not do so. Things like altering graph scales, or only exhibiting data between the two extremes favorable to the author’s cause (can you say Al Gore Hockey Stick Chart?) are all techniques used by the math abuser. Using scaling factors certainly plays into that as well.
AZfederalist on May 11, 2009 at 10:09 PM
This “exercise,” er sorry, book to make the populace feel they have a voice, is only so Axelrod knows how to word the speeches for the TOTUS.
Sadly, marijuana probably won’t be in the next speech.
Pomme143 on May 12, 2009 at 2:56 AM
I have several questions about this, but it boils down to ‘why?’, ‘WTF?’ and “Whatthehellis a ‘word cloud’?”
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 12, 2009 at 3:36 AM
That’s why they award the 10 points. Liberals are mighty crafty when pushing numbers around. People will say that 92,000 people voted for that rather then only 9200. They love to do the same with money. BO cut 17 billion from the budget. As BO said, that’s a lot of money to people outside of DC. He’s right that it is a lot of money and they use the dollar amount because a headline of BO cuts .02% from the budget just doesn’t sound as grand as 17 billion. Take global warming and CO2. They love to tell you about carbon footprints and how much in tonnage the human race puts out in CO2 but if they used a percent and told you the human race contributes .00001% of the CO2 then people would rightful say who gives a crap but millions of tons people can say is really a lot.
jmarcure on May 12, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Especially if those citizens happen to agree with a certain president we all know…
Aronne on May 12, 2009 at 11:33 AM
I love the education section. “We need sex ed!” “We need art class!” “We don’t have any engineers or scientists!”
I’ve got bad news for you Obama voters, you don’t get engineers and scientists (or bullet trains or windmills)by teaching school kids about masturbation and ceramics.
bitsy on May 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM
No, but it seems you get plenty of politicians
E L Frederick (Sniper One) on May 12, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Comment pages: