Video: The damage Obama’s international tax will do

posted at 10:54 am on May 11, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Our friend Dan Mitchell at the Center for Freedom and Prosperity has taken a look at Barack Obama’s plan to “close loopholes” on American business taxes from overseas profit, and concludes that this could be as damaging to the economy as anything this administration has yet done.  He calls the existing taxes on foreign revenues a “discriminatory” tax, one that already puts American business on a poor competitive footing abroad.  The new effort will make that exponentially worse:

Mitchell says that a principled taxation policy would limit itself to territorial taxation, ie, the nation where the income gets realized gets to collect the tax.  After all, the income gets realized in that nation, and the rationale for business taxation is that one needs to repay the structure that allows businesses to operate within an enforced rule of law.  The American government doesn’t provide that structure in Ireland, the Netherlands, Hong Kong, or the Cayman Islands, the latter of which prefers to allow businesses to keep their revenue in return for providing jobs to its citizens.

Even beyond principle, however, the new policy means that American businesses will pay a high penalty for being American.  Using Dan’s example, a business based in the US would pay more than three times as much tax on its international business than one on the Netherlands.  It won’t take much more than a year or two of those kinds of losses before the business begins looking for Amsterdam offices instead of New York digs.

Even if they don’t, who pays for those taxes in the end?  Not the businesses; businesses pass costs along to consumers and labor in higher prices and job reductions.  As prices go up, the businesses become less competitive in the markets both here and abroad, and consumers make other choices that fit their budgets.  Result: American businesses fold, and imports and trade deficits increase.

It’s basically a Smoot-Hawley for the era of globalization.  We’re going to see capital flight out of the US, and some nation with sensible policies will become the next center of high finance.  If the Brits won’t wise up, it could be Ireland or the Netherlands, but if this keeps up, it won’t be New York for much longer.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Typical. Fix a bad situation by making it worse. What better way to miantain a crisis?

Friendly21 on May 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM

Don’t worry: under the Obama Mis-Administration, only the evil pay taxes.

Laurence on May 11, 2009 at 3:49 PM

Haven’t harped on it recently but the “0″ is a 21st century Alchemist who thinks he can produce wealth from non-wealth in contradiction to nearly all economic models. All hail the Alchemist-in-Chief.

chemman on May 11, 2009 at 3:55 PM

These videos are great. They just need to work on the lighting a bit.

Tzetzes on May 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM

A pretty sad situation when we’re down to relying on Senator Max Baucus, D-MT, and a handful of other Democratic senators to put a brake on this insanity.

churchill995 on May 11, 2009 at 9:12 PM

The only good news here is that if we survive the Obama regime, nobody will vote for a liberal again for 20 years. Or maybe I’m being too optimistic.

Daggett on May 11, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Maybe not too optomistic; wsj.com has a story about some Democrats supporting a do-gooder Center for Science in the Public Interest proposal to tax soft drinks and other sugary drinks, including juice drinks, sports drinks, etc., to help pay for health care. It notes a 3 cents per 12 oz. drink would raise $24 million (assuming they would stop there). Of course given how they look out for us, diet drinks would be exempt. Trust me, with one teenager in the house already complaining about how regular drinks have been removed from her school and only diet drinks or water available due to a directive from the governor of my state, the liberals might be chasing the young, and perhaps even beyond that, away.

churchill995 on May 11, 2009 at 10:38 PM

Maybe not too optimistic*…fixed it

churchill995 on May 11, 2009 at 10:40 PM

This is what happens when “community organizers” are allowed to steer tax law. Shouldn’t this man have at least run a successful lemonade stand first?

oldleprechaun on May 11, 2009 at 11:24 PM

Comment pages: 1 2