Zo to RINOs: No, seriously, leave the party

posted at 2:27 pm on May 9, 2009 by Allahpundit

His second attempt this month to get social moderates to skedaddle, and a nice complement to Huck’s warning yesterday that a GOP without social cons would be as vital and viable as the Whigs. His riff on oil is irresistible, though. Oh, the dilemma of being a libertarian conservative and having to take sides between Zo and Meggie Mac…

Eh, it’s high time for a third party anyway. All we need is someone to lead it. Hmmm.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

treat your fellow catholic with love.

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM

the truth is loving…Protestants don’t say things like this….

AP) Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches.

link

so apparently us protestants aren’t christian…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:58 PM

If I’m not mistaken, the following quote was made against all people who support gay marriage, all people who support abortion, and all people who believe in evolution, and it was not even in response to the person who called you a `fascist bible thumper’

I’ve argued with him before…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:01 PM

gay marriage/baby-killing darwiniacs are liberal fascists..

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Sure, the guy you were responding to used the term “creationist homophobe”, but do you object to either of those labels? I can see how you might argue that you’re not a homophobe (being against gay marriage doesn’t imply that you are homophobic), but you do argue for creationism and against evolution, no?

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 5:56 PM

but yes, I will stand by that statement.

the gays in CA, for example, are clearly fascists…and they want to silence any who disagree with them.

the abortionists have their little ‘freedom from speech’ zones around their clinics..

the darwiniacs sue, silence and harass any who disagree with them…like sternberg, gonzales, crocker…

why don’t you give me the example of social con fascism???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM

really? list your examples…and try to answer my question about AHNULD….

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:39 PMPM

EXAMPLE:

I can’t get along with you. I will not moderate, nor will I compromise….you are another foe. as far as I am concerned YOU are just the democrats…fascist little nazis.

you ARE what you say you hate.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM

I didn’t answer your question as it was not directed at me.

would one of you libertarians explain how your views differ from AHNOLD???

I am not a libertarian.

I’d have to be given a list of views for comparison, as I haven’t followed the governor’s policy views closely. However, I cannot imagine supporting the fiscal irresponsibility he has and continues to support.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM

so thats your example of christian fascism??? really?

uh yeah….

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM

Another example of intolerance and attempts to suppress dissent:

you can have the GOP, and the hell with both of you. you sure haven’t done us any good at all…and we don’t need you…

christianity survived the roman empire…I think we can survive obama…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:09 PM

Another example of intolerance and attempts to suppress dissent:

you can have the GOP, and the hell with both of you. you sure haven’t done us any good at all…and we don’t need you…

christianity survived the roman empire…I think we can survive obama…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:09 PM

it is?? wow!! what are you smokin???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

but yes, I will stand by that statement.

the gays in CA, for example, are clearly fascists…and they want to silence any who disagree with them.

the abortionists have their little ‘freedom from speech’ zones around their clinics..

the darwiniacs sue, silence and harass any who disagree with them…like sternberg, gonzales, crocker…

why don’t you give me the example of social con fascism???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM

Why do you have to make such blanket accusations? “the gays in CA?” seriously? Not all gay people are Perez Hilton. So everyone who believes in evolution is a fascist? This is the vitriol and hate I am talking about.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

I mean examples of trying to squelch the freedom of speech of other groups! you know like the examples I gave…

disagreeing with someone and not voting republican is NOT an example of fascism…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

Why do you have to make such blanket accusations? “the gays in CA?” seriously? Not all gay people are Perez Hilton. So everyone who believes in evolution is a fascist? This is the vitriol and hate I am talking about.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

‘blanket accusation’??? what is happening is happening…those in the gay movement who disagree, for example, are of no consequence…are they?

but of course the blanket accusations of christians being fascist is of course no concern of yours…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM

You mock those with whom you disagree:

reading is fundamnetal..I said it would end religious liberty in this country…christianity will survive quite nicely…it won’t end christianity…it will just make us stronger…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:48 PM

yet, this is what you wrote:

then I’m not going to kick them out of it.

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 5:16 PM

I am, because gay marriage ends freedom for christianity.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM

You seem to be so angry that you forget to capitalize the “C” in Christianity. I wonder whether you forget the Christ in your anity as well.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:13 PM

I gave you examples, please give me examples of social con fascism…I may even agree if you have some good ones…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM

You mock those with whom you disagree:

oh yes thats worse than HITLER!! and yes I am mocking you, for such foolishness….

You seem to be so angry that you forget to capitalize the “C” in Christianity. I wonder whether you forget the Christ in your anity as well.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM

yeah I’m right there with DEVIL HIMSELF!!! (notice how I capitalized ‘devil’ )

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:17 PM

I would like to discuss that. The ground rules. How does one have an amicable discussion with someone who is screaming at you and calling you names.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 5:56 PM

For me? Its actualy pretty simple.

I have a philosophy, and beliefs, that I live my life by, and one of those beliefs is that we are all endowed with Freedom of thought, and Conscience. That it is the excercise of those things that we will be judged on.

And, for me, the corolary is that it is EVIL to take that Freedom of choice, and conscience, away from another.

Thus, no matter how wrong I may think you are, no matter how I may argue a point, I don’t take you being wrong PERSONALY, for I will not be Judged by your beliefs or actions, only my own, and because I am not so convinced of my own infallibility that I will not listen to others.

But its not my place to enforce MY rules, or views, on others, their actions and views will be judged in the end… and not by me.

So, I can disagree, and still be Civil, because neither you, nor I, is the referee in the end.

Romeo13 on May 9, 2009 at 6:18 PM

but what did he do? is the culture changed at all? no…did the government in MA get any smaller? not that you would notice..

the republicans are all for growing government, conservatism has failed as a political ideology.

we need someone like WILBERFORCE to change not only the laws, but the culture…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM

He cut the rate of growth in Medicaid and decrease the number of state employees.

I’m not pointing to Weld as a role model, rather someone who came to mind when a commenter implied that all social moderates are fiscal liberals.

The idea that government should be an agent of social change requires that government should have the power to change culture–each side can have opposing views on which changes should be made but they are both relying on a powerful government.

Others would say that the government should allow individuals, their families, communities and churches to address the culture while government should be small enough to stay out of their way.

dedalus on May 9, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Right4life, you really are an angry, vile person. Not a single post of yours in this thread has shown any tolerance or love. And isn’t pure love what Jesus was all about?

Not very Christian of you.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Right4life, you really are an angry, vile person. Not a single post of yours in this thread has shown any tolerance or love. And isn’t pure love what Jesus was all about?

Not very Christian of you.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM

didn’t Jesus say something about ‘judging not, lest ye be judged’

sounds like you are the one filled with hate.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:24 PM

and I’m sure Jesus was all for gay marriage!!! right…are you pro-abortion too? just like uh ‘jesus’??

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:24 PM

I gave you examples, please give me examples of social con fascism…I may even agree if you have some good ones…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:16 PM

The point I was making is that you have examples of some people doing things you don’t like, that you consider to be fascist, but you make blanket accusations against all people of the same “category.” It’s just as bad as someone saying all Christians are evil bastards because Fred Phelps crashes soldiers’ funerals or because some Catholic priests were child molesters. It’s just as bad as Garafolo calling all tea party protesters white supremacists. I won’t join the Democrats because those kinds of accusations are made daily on their side. I’m ready to leave the Republican party and return to the independents because people like you do the same over here.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM

didn’t Jesus say something about ‘judging not, lest ye be judged’

sounds like you are the one filled with hate.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:24 PM

Oh, sweet irony…you’re a pip.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM

oh I know, if I was for gay marriage, I would be loving and tolerant…unlike the rest of those who are for gay marriage…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM

are you pro-abortion too?

I’ve said repeatedly…I’m adamantly pro-life.

Not only do you judge others like there’s no tomorrow, you get it wrong.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM

that you consider to be fascist, but you make blanket accusations against all people of the same “category.”

isn’t that what the ‘moderates’ do to the VILE social cons??

you have to generalize groups to a certain extent…does every christian social con believe the same things?? obviously not..but we are all part of the dread social-con/fascist union to rule the world!!!

newsflash: I am NOT a republican!! please…leave the party, who cares? stay in, make it a moderate party, which it already is!! conservatism is OVER as a governing philosphy in this country…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM

I’ve said repeatedly…I’m adamantly pro-life.

Not only do you judge others like there’s no tomorrow, you get it wrong.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM

really?? did I call personally call YOU vile and hateful??

and no I don’t know every position you have….the world does not revolve around you…sorry.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:29 PM

r4l, a true Christian should bring others to the light and love of Jesus Christ. Seems you like to chase them away.

You’ve done nothing else in this thread except hammer everyone. If your church is like you, I’d steer clear of it.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Oh, sweet irony…you’re a pip.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM

no irony. you personally judge me. guess Jesus doesn’t need to…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

newsflash: I am NOT a republican!!
right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Then why do you care whether the Republican party moves toward the party of small government/fiscal conservatism and away from the party of social conservatism?

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

r4l, a true Christian should bring others to the light and love of Jesus Christ. Seems you like to chase them away.

You’ve done nothing else in this thread except hammer everyone. If your church is like you, I’d steer clear of it.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

I’ve ‘hammered’ people? oh please I get so tired of people like you have who have problem of accusing people like me of being hateful, vile, fascist, etc…and then when responded to you whine…give me a break you whitewashed hypocrite..

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:31 PM

I’ve said repeatedly…I’m adamantly pro-life.

Not only do you judge others like there’s no tomorrow, you get it wrong.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM

really?? did I call personally call YOU vile and hateful??

and no I don’t know every position you have….the world does not revolve around you…sorry.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:29 PM

You’re never gonna “get it” on this, it’s pointless.

You said I was probably pro-abortion. You’re wrong. You judged, and you were wrong.

God Bless. Jet, out.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM

…countries that drill their own oil, btw!
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

LOL

Obamanuts would rather print more money than drill our own oil, as if wasting trees and inks on paper money that finally gets burned rather than recycled is GREENER than drilling and refining our own oil and saving all that transportation cost and risk of piracy or accident.

maverick muse on May 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Then why do you care whether the Republican party moves toward the party of small government/fiscal conservatism and away from the party of social conservatism?

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

I don’t…I’ve given up on the republican party years ago…but I am trying to argue the case for social conservatives who vote largely for republcans…but more and more of us are getting it that the republicans are just democrats lite…

you know for years christians sat out elections…we didn’t vote at all..see what happens to the republicans when we go back to that…as we are…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM

isn’t that what the ‘moderates’ do to the VILE social cons??

you have to generalize groups to a certain extent…does every christian social con believe the same things?? obviously not..but we are all part of the dread social-con/fascist union to rule the world!!!

newsflash: I am NOT a republican!! please…leave the party, who cares? stay in, make it a moderate party, which it already is!! conservatism is OVER as a governing philosphy in this country…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM

I don’t hate social conservatives. I disagree with some of their social policy positions, but I don’t hate the people (hell, the only reason I actively campaigned for McCain was because of Palin). I’m against people like you who spew hatred against anyone who disagrees with your views.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM

You said I was probably pro-abortion. You’re wrong. You judged, and you were wrong.

God Bless. Jet, out.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM

I said you were ‘PROBABLY’ pro-abortion…and I JUDGED??? oh but you calling me VILE AND HATEFUL…was a just and righteous judgement becasue YOU made it…

are you for real??

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM

The problem is not the social conservatives or fiscal conservatives. It is the neo-conservatives. The neocon politicians do not care about either small government or social conservatism, even though they dupe social and fiscal con voters into believing they do.

The Dean on May 9, 2009 at 6:34 PM

I’m against people like you who spew hatred against anyone who disagrees with your views.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM

I am really sick of this liberal tactic of accusing your opponents of ‘hatred’ I responded to those calling me fascist, and thats ‘hateful’ but of course you would never say that about those who call people like me fascist…

you’re a hyppocrite.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

The Dean on May 9, 2009 at 6:34 PM

bingo.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

and the reason people like you call people like me ‘hateful’ is you disagree with what we say, and want to silence us…a fascist tactic.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

So, I can disagree, and still be Civil, because neither you, nor I, is the referee in the end.

Romeo13 on May 9, 2009 at 6:18 PM

I agree with this, and try to be this way myself. I know that I fail at times. And then, i try to make amends.

But its not my place to enforce MY rules, or views, on others, their actions and views will be judged in the end… and not by me.

We all have a stake in this debate. We all need to advocate for the rules we believe should apply.

My view: It is to the benefit of extreme liberals that the Republican Party fails to unite and become an effective opponent. This is what they need to remain in power. Our ongoing purges and internecine warfare are aiding and abetting those who are threatening our country. Every camp within the Republican party seems to have people using these tactics who claim to be members.

Therefore, I am starting to point out those among us who are intolerant of and bullying toward those differing but rational opinions. Also, I am starting to point out those who rationalize such bullying tactics, as this abets them as well. I encourage all who use these tactics, or excuse these tactics to consider the outcome for our Party and our country.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

I am really sick of this liberal tactic of accusing your opponents of ‘hatred’ I responded to those calling me fascist, and thats ‘hateful’ but of course you would never say that about those who call people like me fascist…

you’re a hyppocrite.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

It’s just as bad as someone saying all Christians are evil bastards because Fred Phelps crashes soldiers’ funerals or because some Catholic priests were child molesters. It’s just as bad as Garafolo calling all tea party protesters white supremacists. I won’t join the Democrats because those kinds of accusations are made daily on their side.
vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM

I’ve finally realized that you’re not really interested in debate, you’re just a troll, and one I’m no longer going to feed. Good game.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM

uh huh….

I’m against people like you who spew hatred against anyone who disagrees with your views.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM

sounds like ‘hatred’ to you is disagreeing with your views….

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM

dedalus on May 9, 2009 at 6:18 PM

I think Governor Weld is a good example of a fiscal conservative and social liberal/libertarian. This is the type of person who won’t be in the majority in the Party, but should not be kicked out, called a RINO, or verbally harassed or threatened.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:43 PM

you’re just a troll, and one I’m no longer going to feed. Good game.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM

oh yeah you called me another name!! my how tolerant and loving of you!! and where did I call you names again??

oh but I know, when you do it, its tolerand and loving, if I disagree its HATEFUL and fascist!!!

nice.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:43 PM

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

One thing I realized long long ago, is that it only takes a few people to destroy any chance of rational discourse, and thus destroy any chance of a compromise.

5% on both sides of any question are so invested in being right, that they start to yell, especialy is someone of an opposing viewpoint makes a good point. Suddenly, the 90% in the middle no longer want to participate in the debate because it is so partisan and nasty…

Like the Racism stuff… or even the Abortion debate… strong opinions and an all or nothing opinion destroys any chance for reasonble compromise…

I mean, come on… wouldn’t it be better to have Abortions outlawed after the first trimester than the situation we have now? Wouldn’t it be a step in the correct direction? (and yes, I’m Pro Life, but also understand that if I can’t totaly get rid of evil, minimizing it is better than nothing).

But for this opinion, I’m sure I’ll be called all kinds of names….

Anywho… daughter is giving me the stinky eye… going to see Trek.

Bye all.

Romeo13 on May 9, 2009 at 6:45 PM

yeah I’m right there with DEVIL HIMSELF!!! (notice how I capitalized ‘devil’ )

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:17 PM

I do notice that. I also notice that you don’t seem very accepting of or caring about others. I’m not reading much Christian love and fellowship in your posts. Why?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Just wanna ask r4l one question:

Where in this thread have you shown love and compassion to anyone? Take a look…copy, and paste it please.

Although something tells me you won’t (’cause it ain’t there) and you’ll go off on some shpeel…

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

My view: It is to the benefit of extreme liberals that the Republican Party fails to unite and become an effective opponent. This is what they need to remain in power. Our ongoing purges and internecine warfare are aiding and abetting those who are threatening our country. Every camp within the Republican party seems to have people using these tactics who claim to be members.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:35 PM

I think you’re right about this.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

I do notice that. I also notice that you don’t seem very accepting of or caring about others. I’m not reading much Christian love and fellowship in your posts. Why?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

so if I accepted gay marriage, abortion and evolution, I would be loving!!??

what would you have me do on a message board to be loving??

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM

Where in this thread have you shown love and compassion to anyone? Take a look…copy, and paste it please.

Although something tells me you won’t (’cause it ain’t there) and you’ll go off on some shpeel…

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

I think its loving to tell the truth.

and where have you been loving on here??

have I judged anyone?? have I called anyone vile and hateful?? no.

you should take the log out of your eye before you take the spec out of another’s…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:50 PM

and when I have called a group, or tactic ‘fascist’ I have backed it up with an example…so far none of you have backed up your charges of ‘fascism’ against people like me..

and tell me where I am hateful??

apparently to you JetBoy, being against gay marriage IS hateful…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:52 PM

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Just as predicted. I asked where in this thread have you shown love and compassion. I asked that you copy and paste it.

As I said, you won’t because you can’t. Because you haven’t.

Nice shpeel tho…congrats.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:53 PM

Just as predicted. I asked where in this thread have you shown love and compassion. I asked that you copy and paste it.

As I said, you won’t because you can’t. Because you haven’t.

Nice shpeel tho…congrats.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 6:53 PM

I told you, you just refuse to see it…now why don’t you answer my questions???

gay marriage is a sin. that is loving.

you can’t.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:54 PM

here’s another question for you JB..how do you call yourself a catholic when you are in direct disobedience to the teaching of that church?

shouldn’t you leave the catholic church, since you believe in gay marriage?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:57 PM

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:57 PM

I’ll answer your question when you either answer mine…copy and paste the comment you believe shows love and compassion first, or just simply say that you can’t. Don’t simply give me the “well the truth hurts, and I’m just telling the truth” thing.

Not holding my breath tho.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:01 PM

but what did he do? is the culture changed at all? no…did the government in MA get any smaller? not that you would notice..

the republicans are all for growing government, conservatism has failed as a political ideology.

we need someone like WILBERFORCE to change not only the laws, but the culture…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM

ok JB, now try to answer my questions….bet you won’t…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:02 PM

and yes tellin people that gay marriage is a sin is loving…would you let people live a lie and have to be judged for it, or tell them the truth?

Jesus forgave sin, He didn’t excuse it..and say it was not a sin…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:04 PM

Then why do you care whether the Republican party moves toward the party of small government/fiscal conservatism and away from the party of social conservatism?

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:30 PM

I don’t…I’ve given up on the republican party years ago…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM

So, right4life, you don’t care about the Republican Party. This is important to remember when discussing any political topic with you.

but I am trying to argue the case for social conservatives who vote largely for republcans…but more and more of us are getting it that the republicans are just democrats lite…

you know for years christians sat out elections…we didn’t vote at all..see what happens to the republicans when we go back to that…as we are…

More threats.

I don’t believe Christians have ever sat out any election in our country. I don’t even believe an entire denomination ever sat out an election.

What do you mean by “Christians?”

Just your own denomination, or just your own church, or just yourself?

Who do you consider to be “Christian?”

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:04 PM

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:02 PM

Gotta admit, that’s probably the least “angry” of your comments, but where exactly is the love and compassion being showed…and to whom?

See, again…you just don’t get it.

But I’ll answer your question anyway. I am, and always will be, Catholic. Sure, the Catholic Church does not condone gay marriage. Then again, I’m not married. The Church doesn’t hate gays either. And Jesus hates no one.

And believing that the Catholic Church is the true church set up by Christ Himself, why would I even think of leaving it?

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:08 PM

So, right4life, you don’t care about the Republican Party. This is important to remember when discussing any political topic with you.

correct, I care more about principles than pary!

you know for years christians sat out elections…we didn’t vote at all..see what happens to the republicans when we go back to that…as we are…
More threats.

I find your words not only to lies, but hateful and vile.

I don’t believe Christians have ever sat out any election in our country. I don’t even believe an entire denomination ever sat out an election.

I don’t believe the Amish vote…oh but you dont’ consider any but catholics to be christians do you?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM

oh but you dont’ consider any but catholics to be christians do you?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM

There goes that infamous r4l judgment call again…

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:10 PM

Gotta admit, that’s probably the least “angry” of your comments, but where exactly is the love and compassion being showed…and to whom?

See, again…you just don’t get it.

I do get it…instead of worrying about the size of government, I am more concerned about the culture that produces a big government…it just doesn’t happen in a vacuum…you don’t get it…

But I’ll answer your question anyway. I am, and always will be, Catholic.

its pretty obvious you don’t get it…you deny one of the tenents of the church, yet you call yourself catholic. but since people like Pelosi do it too…what does it really mean to be a catholic?? what do you have to believe…anything goes???

Church doesn’t hate gays either. And Jesus hates no one.

then why do you hate people who are against gay marriage, and tell the truth about the sin of homosexuality??

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:12 PM

There goes that infamous r4l judgment call again…

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:10 PM

aren’t you the one who said the catholic church was the ONE TRUE church???

so the rest of us are not part of the true church…right?? isn’t that a judgement call on your part???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM

aren’t you the one who said the catholic church was the ONE TRUE church???

so the rest of us are not part of the true church…right?? isn’t that a judgement call on your part???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM

Yep…I did say I believe the Catholic Church to be the One, True Church. I did not say, however, that other Christians weren’t true Christians. That’s your statement of judgment. If you knew anything about Catholics, we believe that being Catholic is not a necessity for salvation, nor is it something that is wrong.

But again, you jumped the gun.

Goodnight.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:19 PM

Threads like this make me want to beat my face against a brick wall. That said, I’m taking the bait simply because I don’t see my own position reflected here….

I’m a three-pronged Conservative: fiscal, defense, and social. I place them in that order of importance. Without economic freedom, we have no freedom at all, because power follows the money. Since large government bureaucracies require greater revenue to operate, which removes capital from the free economy and therefore limits economic freedom, I am first and foremost a small-government, free-market capitalist.

Defense policy is second to fiscal in my book only because it is impossible to have a strong defense without a strong fiscal policy – a government that limits economic freedom cannot fund a strong defense and encourage the technological innovation required to retain superpower status. And yes, I do think America is safest as a superpower, which attracts allies and deters enemies.

Social policy is third in my book. While I may not agree with the social activities of some of my fellow citizens, I really don’t want my tax dollars wasted in directing their behavior any more than the Constitution already dictates. Furthermore, as I’m becoming an ever more enthusiastic Federalist, I believe that social legislation should occur only at the State level. As such, I think Roe v. Wade should be overturned, and abortion returned to a state issue. That said, I think the policy argument over abortion is a waste of time until we have addressed the issue culturally – if we were to overturn the ruling now, it would just lead to a lot of dangerous back-alley abortions, and the ruling would probably be restored soon thereafter. Better that we emphasize improving education first, since science and history can defend the pro-life position as well as if not better than religion. 98% of all abortions occur for socio-economic reasons – we have to change the popular mentality before we can change the law. Another thing we social cons should consider is the fact that, if you make your pet social issue your priority, savvy politicians can use it to essentially BUY your vote…. and then, if they do more harm than help, you’ve just contributed to your own misfortune. I’m no fan of gay marriage, but as long as religious institutions retain the right to refuse to marry or recognize homosexual couples, and the issue remains a state one instead of a national policy, I don’t see how it violates the Constitution.

I expect people to vote on whatever issues are most important to them. As such, I may find myself in a coalition with an adamant pro-lifer who doesn’t care as much about strong defense policy, and a strong fiscal libertarian with socially moderate views. I’d cooperate with them when we agree and oppose them when we don’t, and I’d pick my battles based on my priorities. Based on the current state of the country and the Republican party, I’m more likely to back off of the social issues for the time being and emphasize the fiscal. That’s not selling out, it’s PRIORITIZING. And I’m not going to tell you you’re not a “true conservative” if your priorities are different from mine.

Bottom line: CHILL OUT, everybody. We all have common interests or we wouldn’t be here.

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM

Romeo13 on May 9, 2009 at 6:45 PM

One thing I realized long long ago, is that it only takes a few people to destroy any chance of rational discourse, and thus destroy any chance of a compromise.

This is very true. And in so doing, the bullies turn off and intimidate all those who witness the bullying. It’s a very effective tactic at polarizing people and forcing submission. Anyone who uses this approach is an opponent of Liberty. And anyone who excuses it, or is indifferent to it, is sacrificing Liberty for safety or popularity.

strong opinions and an all or nothing opinion destroys any chance for reasonable compromise…

Compromise can be very difficult, especially when we are passionate about our beliefs, or hold them very deeply and consider them defining.

Yet, most of us who have been married know that compromises have to be made. And if they are not, one person becomes the tyrant and the other the slave.

Anywho… daughter is giving me the stinky eye… going to see Trek.

Bye all.

Caving into your daughter’s stinky eye, huh?

Does that make you a RINO?

My best wishes to you, and hope you survive. Parenting is haaaaaaard.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:22 PM

Eh, it’s high time for a third party anyway. All we need is someone to lead it.

Get Tim Pawlenty and Meghain McCain. “Walmart Libertarians who love Big Macs” can be your platform.

chunderroad on May 9, 2009 at 7:23 PM

I think you’re right about this.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM

Thanks. What to do about it, I am not certain. If you encounter me again here and have any advice, please share it with me, or invite me to a thread in which it is bing discussed. This is a major problem, I believe.

Also, any criticism is welcome. I have no idea if I am approaching this correctly. I feel like a blind man, tapping along, trying to find a path through this mess.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:26 PM

Maybe Arnie would be down with drilling if we could give it steroids?

- The Cat

MirCat on May 9, 2009 at 7:28 PM

so the rest of us are not part of the true church…right?? isn’t that a judgement call on your part???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Yep…I did say I believe the Catholic Church to be the One, True Church. I did not say, however, that other Christians weren’t true Christians. That’s your statement of judgment. If you knew anything about Catholics, we believe that being Catholic is not a necessity for salvation, nor is it something that is wrong.

But again, you jumped the gun.

Goodnight.

JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:19 PM

didn’t say anything about salvation did I?

but again you jumped the gun…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM

so if I accepted gay marriage, abortion and evolution, I would be loving!!??

what would you have me do on a message board to be loving??

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM

It’s not your policy positions I oppose, but rather your aggressive debating tactics. There seems to be more aggression than debate.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM

Elric66 on May 9, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Because we’re a coalition that cannot survive without having different views in it.

YOU would never have been allowed in the republican party in the first place if we had not been open to you. Because if you think the current breed of social conservatives are representative of republicans from way back you’re kidding yourself.

We needed more voters and so we took you in. We’re happy to help you get some of what you want and in return we want you to compromise as well.

That’s fair. If we cannot work together because you won’t compromise on anything then we have no working relationship and we cannot be allies anymore. If we cannot be allies anymore then one of us leaves the party and the party is rendered unelectable until someone else is brought into the party.

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 7:31 PM

It’s not your policy positions I oppose, but rather your aggressive debating tactics. There seems to be more aggression than debate.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM

at least I don’t ‘mischaracterize’ ie lie about people’s positions…

calling what I said a ‘threat’ was hateful, vile, and beyond the pale of decent conversation….you hold yourself up as some exemplar of debate…and then you stoop to a tactic like that…despicable.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:32 PM

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 7:31 PM

so explain to me how Lincoln, who went to war over a social issue, a libertarian like you?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:33 PM

Zo/Palin 2012.

BuckeyeSam on May 9, 2009 at 7:35 PM

I’ve read lewrockwell.com a libertarian site, and they hate lincoln with a passion.

so how can they be republican?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM

correct, I care more about principles than pary!

Throughout our country’s history, we have used political parties to effect our principles into laws through legislation. Parties are needed. Without them, we have chaos or one party rule.

I find your words not only to lies, but hateful and vile.

Please point me to examples of my lies, or hateful or vile comments.

This is what you wrote:

you know for years christians sat out elections…we didn’t vote at all..see what happens to the republicans when we go back to that…as we are…

Therefore, I accuse you of making threats to withhold the Christian vote from the Republicans unless the party adheres to your views.

I don’t believe the Amish vote…

Just a quick search:
Amish turn out to vote in election

However, after you mentioned it, I recalled that Amish often do not vote in state or national elections. But I have not yet determined what at what percentage rate and how frequently that is true.

oh but you dont’ consider any but catholics to be christians do you?

You can’t point to one of my posts where I ever said that only Catholics are Christian. Nor do I believe such a thing. So, what purpose do you have in suggesting that?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:48 PM

Therefore, I accuse you of making threats to withhold the Christian vote from the Republicans unless the party adheres to your views.

and I find characterizing what I said as a THREAT to be vile, hateful and despicable? how hard is this?

You can’t point to one of my posts where I ever said that only Catholics are Christian. Nor do I believe such a thing. So, what purpose do you have in suggesting that?

you said christians don’t site out elections…so I mentioned the amish…and was asking if you thought they were christian???

why don’t you tell me what purpose you have in characterizing not voting for republcans a THREAT???

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM

in this day and age a THREAT can wind you up in jail…why would you lie about me like that?

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 7:54 PM

you’re just a troll, and one I’m no longer going to feed. Good game.

vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM

oh yeah you called me another name!! my how tolerant and loving of you!! and where did I call you names again??

oh but I know, when you do it, its tolerand and loving, if I disagree its HATEFUL and fascist!!!

nice.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 6:43 PM

I’m beginning to wonder what the difference would be between the postings of an ex-Christian liberal troll coming here to sow as much dissension as possible among conservative Republicans and our potential allies, and your posts, right4life.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM

Threads like this make me want to beat my face against a brick wall.

Up until recently, I have avoided such threads as if they carried the plague. I still avoid most of them.

That said, I’m taking the bait simply because I don’t see my own position reflected here….

I’m a three-pronged Conservative: fiscal, defense, and social. I place them in that order of importance.

Based on the current state of the country and the Republican party, I’m more likely to back off of the social issues for the time being and emphasize the fiscal. That’s not selling out, it’s PRIORITIZING. And I’m not going to tell you you’re not a “true conservative” if your priorities are different from mine.

I think you make very reasonable arguments for your positions, and I tend to agree with you. Your last point is absolutely Reaganesque. More power to you!

Bottom line: CHILL OUT, everybody. We all have common interests or we wouldn’t be here.

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM

We all have common interests except for the liberal trolls, whom I almost entirely ignore, and those who would prefer to silence debate instead of having debate, whom I have only begun to fight.

So, I apologize for not chilling out, but the bullying is getting me steaming at times.

I suggest ice cream. That would be good for getting me chill out. Can you post me some? I prefer vanilla with chocolate syrup.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:10 PM

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM

really? could have fooled me. what you have you done for us? other than the partial-birth abortion ban, not much.

We can’t give you things that aren’t ours to give. You’re blaming us for your own political failures. We are your allies. We didn’t stop you from pushing your social positions even though many of them made us sick.

Why? First, we were always pretty sure it would fail. They’re not popular ideas and just aren’t going to go anywhere. Second, we’re allies and we need each other. Don’t blame us because no one else wants your concept. We have not worked actively against you and we have supported you to the extent we can. In return, we expect the same.

We tolerate you. You tolerate us. Without that the party is over. The party is a coalition. Without cooperation it does not exist. I feel like I’m explaining this to a small child. This is basic stuff here people. If we don’t wise up then the democrats are going to take over for decades. It’s going to be the 60s all over again. You think your social values are in danger now? Wait till they’re irrelevant. Because that’s your fate if you don’t wise up. THAT is why we allied with you in the first place. We needed help or we were screwed. So we did the adult thing. We made a deal with you.

Now you need to make a deal or coalition fails.

I find your position on evolution idiotic. you cannot defend it…other than belittle those who disagree with your hairygod darwin.

Considering that your “evidence” is a thousands year old religious text that you’re trying to use in a scientific discussion I really don’t have to work too hard to defend myself here.

It pains me that you find evolution threatens your beliefs. I see no reason why the two concepts can’t coexist. Why can’t God have created evolution? I mean, god invented logic, math, physics, etc. So why can’t god have also invented biology? If everything is a consequence of God’s law then is not evolution also god’s law?

Your opposition of evolution is medieval in it’s closed minded backwardness. You should be worried when your grasp of science is more comparable with an ignorant Saudi peasant or 10th century European peasant then it does with someone with a modern education.

What is after all the point of science to people like you if all you’re going to do is denounce it? People like you shouldn’t even be on the internet. You should spread the good work on the back of a horse renouncing all the modern conveniences of the science you neither understand nor respect.

I’m not surprised you’re fine with killing babies…its the holy communion of the left…and you’re not a conservative.

I’m not fine with killing babies. I wish they weren’t killed. I just don’t see a way around it. Sure, it would be nice if people were so perfect that they only had children when they wanted. But biology compels us to have children when it’s not in our interest to have them. Small children as young as 13 start to have powerful sexual urges. I know… I was 13. I wanted to have sex so badly it was painful. So, I’ll tell you what. Start marrying people at 13 years old via arranged marriages you might start making some sense.

But if people aren’t getting married until they’re 25 or 30 then that means DECADES of sex outside of wedlock. Sorry, that’s that biology again. Deal with it.

as far as ‘fascistic’ about the gays…you and the gays are a bunch of brown-shirted nazis..trying to squelch the free speech and religion of any who disagree…and your thuggish tactics in CA prove it.

Hey hey hey, I’m with you on the marriage ban though perhaps for reasons you don’t understand. See, I don’t think marriage should be done by the government at all.

See that? You abolish the “LEGAL” concept of marriage and then gays can go off and get a contract if they want. Likewise, marriage will be something between your family and church. If you and your wife want to get a legal contract that do that too. But there won’t be a standard contract and the nature of the union will be mostly private.

See? Compromise. You win. They win. And we get to change the subject before resorting to killing each other. It’s good for everyone.

I’m NOT gonna compromise to deal with you. Social conservative are sick of being betrayed by you ‘moderates’ thats why your boy mccain lost this last time.

McCain isn’t a moderate. He’s just a sellout. And I’m not a moderate anyway. I just have different values then you do.

YOu’re looking at everything through the lense of a linear one dimensional spectrum from left to right. You’re not taking into consideration that what you call moderates are just people that believe something different and are only vaguely related to you or the socialists that run the democratic party.

I’m a libertarian. I believe in freedom. I am by NO MEANS a moderate. As to betrayals, we’ve not betrayed you. McCain might have… but that’s McCain. And he’s not a libertarian anyway.

You’re still not understanding that we’re a coalition here. A LOT of different values under one roof. Just because I care about some things less then you doesn’t make me a moderate because I happen to care MORE about some things then you do.

See, from my perspective YOU are a moderate. You are a moderate on big government. You are a moderate on socialism. You are a moderate populism. You are a moderate on freedom.

Do you understand? You can’t call me a moderate and dismiss me. You have to recognize that I believe what I believe just as passionately and deeply as anything you believe. I just believe in different things. We can work together to defeat the socialist cancer that eats at the heart of our society. But not if you won’t work with anyone. If you won’t compromise you marginalize yourself and we’ll make other allies.

because when it comes right down to it, we don’t need the politics, we know Who wins in the end…

really? Then would you mind not losing because you’ve been losing a lot lately which is not what people that know how to win do.

You have no magic solution to winning any more then anyone else does. You have a large number of committed people that believe in some things that are close enough to what we believe for an alliance to exist. That is all.

I am not blaming you for the failure of this party. We’ve all made mistakes and will make more in the future. But you have to understand you’re already in a big tent party here. We’ve known it for decades and have treated you with respect for that reason.

If you think you can survive without allies then we’ll have to abandon you entirely or excise you from the party and make new arrangements. We expect you’ll do the same and likely many of you will turn into Jimmy Carter democrats. That’s the way of the world.

uh yeah Lincoln was a REAL libertarian sort a guy….you can as many slaves as you want…please, what are you smokin???

It’s about freedom pal. You either recognize the point or I can’t help you.

and what social programs do you think we like?? you just want to keep killing babies, at all costs…and make your gay allies more equal than the rest of us.

Riiiight… I have no interest in killing babies. As I said above, I really wish that never happened ever. And I don’t have a problem with restrictions on how abortion is used. That said the mothers have rights too.

So there’s a compromise there. And before you tell me we should just make it illegal blah blah blah, well it won’t matter for the babies because most of them will still get aborted. There were abortions in the middle ages despite the power of the church. Nothing you’ll do will stop them. All you’ll do is force women to go to illegal doctors to get it done.

No matter what law you pass you cannot win here. A lot of babies are going to get aborted no matter what. I’m not against your abstinence training, some restrictions on abortion, and maintaining some taboos about the practice. That is the best you’re going to get from anyone. Complaining that that isn’t enough is pointless.

We’ll work with you to get that but asking for more serves no purpose.

again you’re delusional. who is it who sues, silences and harasses all who disagree (besides the gays)..the darwiniacs who cannot stand to have their atheist faith questioned.

Hey hey hey, I’m for school voucher programs too. That means if you want to send your kids to a school that teaches that babies come from the magic stork that drops off kids through the chimney… then fine. I really don’t care what you teach your kids.

See that? That is what libertarians believe. We believe in freedom. Freedom of choice. Freedom of thought. Freedom of action.

If you want to teach your kids that science is evil and constructive thought should be replaced with mindless doctrine. I won’t stop you. I won’t have it in the public school system. That said, I don’t want a public school system anyway. I want private schools that can be funded with vouchers. Thus everyone can afford an education but no one is forced to accept education they don’t want.

By imposing your primitive dogma on the school body you’re indoctrinating people. I’m sorry you doubtless think evolution is indoctrination. It is no more indoctrination then mathematics is indoctrination. But in the spirit of freedom I’m happy to help you get any kind of education you want for your family. In return, I expect you to give me the same.

Let me educate my children as I see fit as well. How can you be against that?

I’ll tell you what, why don’t you try arguing with me on the ‘facts’ of evolution?? you’ll lose.

No I won’t. You’ll just start randomly invalidating evidence that is harmful to your position. You’ll ignore DNA, ignore the fossil record, ignore observed natural selection that can be reproduced in a lab, you’ll ignore radio carbon dating, you’ll throw out all my evidence without justification. And then after you’ve thrown out everything you’ll pull out your little black bible and start pounding it on the table like an angry gorilla.

Look, I don’t care if you want to believe in stupid stuff. That’s your right. I respect your right to believe nonsense.

At the same time, I expect to allowed to believe what I want as well. Get me? Believe whatever you want. I won’t force it down your throat. I won’t go door to door in your neighborhood to preach the good word about science.

I won’t even care if you want to try and indoctrinate me anyway. But what I do expect is the right to ignore you if I want to. That means letting my children learn ACTUAL science if I want them to learn it.

Fair?

and you sure don’t have a problem ignoring the rights of unborn babies…or christians who disagree with gay marriage.

Look, the abortion issue is a really messy one and there’s no good answer for it. I don’t know what to tell you. We’re trying to reduce it but your alternative of forcing everyone to carry the children to full term is neither politically possible or in my opinion ethical.

As to gay marriage, as I said above the solution is to remove marriage from the government as a legal concept entirely. Your church will marry you and if after that marriage you want to sign a document with the government no one will stop you. But it will just be a contract.

I assume you don’t have a problem with gay pre-nups?

I can’t get along with you.

Then you lose. Thanks for playing.

as far as I am concerned YOU are just the democrats…fascist little nazis.

Wait wait wait. I’m a democrat even though I disagree with almost all their party platforms?

And you’re calling me a Nazi even though I’m not telling people what to do and am trying to protect people’s rights and free will?

What kind of Orwellian Good Think talking about?

The problem with people like you is that you think Slavery is Freedom.

You’re deluded.

you ARE what you say you hate.

Only on magical opposite day. ;)

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

If we cannot work together because you won’t compromise on anything then we have no working relationship and we cannot be allies anymore. If we cannot be allies anymore then one of us leaves the party and the party is rendered unelectable until someone else is brought into the party.

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 7:31 PM

That’s a hard analysis to read, but believe you are correct. God help our country if the Republican party cannot unite and get elected into the majority again. The current alternative is very disturbing.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

“And believing that the Catholic Church is the true church set up by Christ Himself, why would I even think of leaving it?”
JetBoy on May 9, 2009 at 7:08 PM

You have since back pedaled from the above statement; but that is a waffle. Inference from reason demands that the above statement eliminates any church as being true other than the Catholic Church. And if a church isn’t true it can’t be Christian. You vividly support the inference with your final statement. So what do you actually believe?

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM
Exactly my thoughts and couldn’t have said it better.

Time to take my run and commune with nature. Will check back in later.

chemman on May 9, 2009 at 8:19 PM

I suggest ice cream. That would be good for getting me chill out. Can you post me some? I prefer vanilla with chocolate syrup.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:10 PM

Vanilla with chocolate syrup coming right up, and I’ll even throw in some crushed Oreos for good measure! :D

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

See, from my perspective YOU are a moderate. You are a moderate on big government. You are a moderate on socialism. You are a moderate populism. You are a moderate on freedom.

Nailed. Thanks.

McCain isn’t a moderate. He’s just a sellout.

Good point.

Only on magical opposite day.

Is this day officially recognized in Hawaii? And does it work only on the days that it isn’t?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Do you have a newsletter? I’d like to subscribe.
vermillionsky on May 9, 2009 at 5:03 PM

Thank you. Sounds like entirely too much work. :P

You can find me on a few forums though and I make a lot of comments on Digg. My name is pretty distinctive. I think you’ll find it if you just type it into google.

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM

I mean, come on… wouldn’t it be better to have Abortions outlawed after the first trimester than the situation we have now? Wouldn’t it be a step in the correct direction? (and yes, I’m Pro Life, but also understand that if I can’t totaly get rid of evil, minimizing it is better than nothing).

Politically, that is reasonable. However it is in the nature of the Christianity that compromises of this kind cannot be made. It’s a religious imperative. I can understand why that would be annoying to many people who are not Christian but there other ways of looking at it.

Isn’t birthrates and demographics one of the big topics on the right? Mark Steyn writes about it all the time. Well, culling generations of newborns is bad for the future growth of the economy, bad for national defense, bad in general.

aengus on May 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 8:23 PM

The Oreos might kill me. Is that a venal or a mortal sin?

No! Don’t tell me! I’ll risk it.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Vanilla with chocolate syrup coming right up, and I’ll even throw in some crushed Oreos for good measure! :D

Animator Girl on May 9, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Sounds sooo good

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Only on magical opposite day.

Is this day officially recognized in Hawaii? And does it work only on the days that it isn’t?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM

Yes and yes. Though sometimes no.

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Are you looking for a kitten’s stocking?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Yes and yes. Though sometimes no.

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM

So it is written. So shall it be.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Are you looking for a kitten’s stocking?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:44 PM

whats that

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM

Are you looking for a kitten’s stocking?

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 8:44 PM

whats that

blatantblue on May 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM

A sock on the puss.

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Loxodonta on May 9, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Lol. I just saw the W.C. Fields classic Never Give A Sucker An Even Break for the first time two days ago and that was one of the funniest lines.

aengus on May 9, 2009 at 9:37 PM

Karmashock on May 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

Bravo!

Rae on May 9, 2009 at 9:49 PM

We can’t give you things that aren’t ours to give. You’re blaming us for your own political failures. We are your allies. We didn’t stop you from pushing your social positions even though many of them made us sick.

really? when the first thing you do is call your ‘allies’ a bunch of fascists??? interesting! and we make you ‘sick’ and you’re our ally??? please…you’re sound just like our enemies the left-wing wackos.

Why? First, we were always pretty sure it would fail. They’re not popular ideas and just aren’t going to go anywhere. Second, we’re allies and we need each other. Don’t blame us because no one else wants your concept. We have not worked actively against you and we have supported you to the extent we can. In return, we expect the same.

yeah with friends like you…please…and your small government fiscal conservatism doesn’t have much appeal now does it??? and no one wants your concept rather obviously.

We tolerate you. You tolerate us. Without that the party is over. The party is a coalition. Without cooperation it does not exist. I feel like I’m explaining this to a small child. This is basic stuff here people. If we don’t wise up then the democrats are going to take over for decades

let the party be over, who cares? I’d rather have a real conservative party than a squishy moderate one, thanks.

and get a clue, the democrats HAVE taken over for decades…just wait til amnesty for illegals…see how many vote for your ‘small gov’ position…where actually the mexicans and the blacks vote FOR a social cause that you say ‘no one wants’ gay marriage…they all voted against it…I guess they’re just not as ‘sophisticated’ as you are…right.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 10:31 PM

Considering that your “evidence” is a thousands year old religious text that you’re trying to use in a scientific discussion I really don’t have to work too hard to defend myself here.

laughable…here I’ll post this from another thread…you try to answer it OK??

i would be really interested to know how, in what way, evolution is being disproved. i mean, i am an open-minded person and enjoy new ideas so i’m game. fill me in.
as I said before a lack of evidence in the fossil record, and in the lab…

adaptive radiation lacks empirical evidence..

link

the tree of life is wrong…

link

conserved and ultra-conserved areas of the genome…why would any area be conserved? and how would evolution know to conserve an area??

the inability of people like miller to answer the irreducable complexity argument…and telling a story doesn’t count.

Haldane’s dilemma

right4life on May 7, 2009 at 7:38 PM

continued because it only lets me post so many links…

Mutational meltdown…which is illustrated nicely in this article…

link

the biological big bang…

link

the sexes…isn’t it convenient that they somehow managed to both evolve at the same time? Dawkins called it an ‘abominable mystery’

animals like the tuatara which has the fastest rate of ‘micro’ DNA evolution and is yet a living dinosaur.

why some animals evolve…like humans…and some do not like the tuatara, the coelecanth…evolution ‘knows’ things….and saying its perfectly adapted is a tautology because the only way you know its adapted is it survives..

and how many other scientists were held in prison, even for years, for theories, discoveries and proven science that we still observe today?

thedude on May 7, 2009 at 4:54 PM
interesting that you would say that…when now its the darwinists who are the ones who sue, silence, and harass all who dare disagree…..see sternberg, gonzales, crocker…

right4life on May 7, 2009 at 7:41 PM

link

now if you want, you can go to that thread and answer, and we can debate on that issue, or go for it on this thread…

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 10:36 PM

It pains me that you find evolution threatens your beliefs. I see no reason why the two concepts can’t coexist. Why can’t God have created evolution? I mean, god invented logic, math, physics, etc. So why can’t god have also invented biology? If everything is a consequence of God’s law then is not evolution also god’s law?

and no they cannot coexist…as Provine admits…

Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly. 1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exists; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent.”

Provine, William B. [Professor of Biological Sciences, Cornell University], “, “Evolution: Free will and punishment and meaning in life”, Abstract of Will Provine’s 1998 Darwin Day Keynote Address.

you don’t really know that much about evolution…sounds like you take it on FAITH!

Your opposition of evolution is medieval in it’s closed minded backwardness. You should be worried when your grasp of science is more comparable with an ignorant Saudi peasant or 10th century European peasant then it does with someone with a modern education.

your forcing evolution upon others is fascist. dawiniacs sue, silence and harass all who dare disagree…as Sternberg, gonzales, and crocker found out.

you truly are the ignorant one….arrogant as well.

right4life on May 9, 2009 at 10:39 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5