Barone: Welcome to the Gangster Presidency

posted at 3:55 pm on May 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Michael Barone departs from his normally moderate tone in today’s Investors Business Daily column to label the Obama administration as Gangster Government.  Instead of following the rule of law, Obama and his henchmen have threatened to kneecap their opposition in the press and use Porkulus as an extortion device to dictate policy.  So far, only one group has been the beneficiary of the gangster tactics:

The White House denied that it strong-armed Perella Weinberg. The firm issued a statement saying it decided to accept the settlement, but it pointedly did not deny that it had been threatened by the White House. Which is to say, the threat worked.

The same goes for big banks that have received billions in government TARP money. Many of them want to give back the money, but the government won’t let them. They also voted to accept the Chrysler settlement. Nice little bank ya got there, wouldn’t want anything to happen to it.

Left-wing bloggers have been saying that the White House’s denial of making threats should be taken at face value and that Lauria’s statement is not evidence to the contrary. But that’s ridiculous. Lauria is a reputable lawyer and a contributor to Democratic candidates. He has no motive to lie. The White House does.

Think carefully about what’s happening here. The White House, presumably car czar Steven Rattner and deputy Ron Bloom, is seeking to transfer the property of one group of people to another group that is politically favored.

In the process it is setting aside basic property rights in favor of rewarding the United Auto Workers for the support the union has given the Democratic Party.

The same process can be seen in California, a state on the edge of bankruptcy, which has relied on Obama’s promises of stimulus spending to recalculate their budget. Because one of their more minor cuts came at the expense of a group of unionized health-care workers, Obama has threatened to withhold the funds, which will disrupt Democratic-engineered budget plans. Remember when Obama said that the stimulus funds wouldn’t come with strings attached?

Especially in the case of the automakers, the entire strategy is self-defeating. Part of the problem with American automakers has been the UAW’s resistance to changes in compensation that would make them more competitive. Now, with the Obama administration tilting the bankruptcies of both Chrysler and GM to put the UAW in control, the likelihood of real change that will produce a competitive firm has all but disappeared. It also puts the union in position to crash Ford, through job actions, because they will need to eliminate the competition in order to make their new stock positions valuable enough to pay off their liabilities.

It’s a disaster created by government fiat, no pun intended. If indeed we’re seeing gangster government, it would help to have smarter gangsters running it. I’d call this a Fredo Government. We keep hearing Obama’s defenders say, “He’s smart! He knows things! Not like everybody says!”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

where’s RICO when you need him?

homesickamerican on May 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM

Hmmm… Rush Limbaugh teaching Obama how to play Fizzbin…

Skywise on May 8, 2009 at 3:58 PM

According to BusinessInsider, Oppenheimer has caved, so another one of Lauria’s clients gave in. Not that the disclosure might not have some long-term benefit, if only in exposing the thuggery.

Wethal on May 8, 2009 at 4:01 PM

Haha! That’s cute about Fredo!

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Michael Barone is one brave man.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

“I’d call this a Fredo Government. We keep hearing Obama’s defenders say, “He’s smart! He knows things! Not like everybody says!””

Now that one just stuck…….

………….. like white on rice!

Seven Percent Solution on May 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM

As a lifelong Chicagoan I didn’t see this coming at all.

Ted Torgerson on May 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Good OT for an update: Chrysler lenders back down under “enormous pressure and machinery of the US government.”

BadgerHawk on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

So, just everybody’s gonna roll over?

I don’t get it. Does this mean they are no longer going to fight for the rule of law that says their investors are supposed to get paid back first?

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Goes along with my favorite saying…why does the government fight the mob? It doesn’t like the competition.

Conservative Voice on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

This is not a BO problem, this is a Federal Government problem.

Conservative Voice on May 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Keep this in Mind:

“Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard–the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money–the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them.

But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law–men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims–then money becomes its creators’ avenger.

Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they’ve passed a law to disarm them.

Excerpt from Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand

Chainsaw56 on May 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Does this mean they are no longer going to fight for the rule of law that says their investors are supposed to get paid back first?

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

It sounds like they value their privacy and the safety of their families.

BadgerHawk on May 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Couldn’t find pictures of real gangsters? Trekker?

Tennman on May 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM

FOTUS…..

……… (Fredo of the United States)

Seven Percent Solution on May 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Bravo, Ed!

Michael Barone is one brave man.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Bravissimo, Barone!

maverick muse on May 8, 2009 at 4:13 PM

where’s RICO when you need him?

homesickamerican on May 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM

Rico Suave?

WashJeff on May 8, 2009 at 4:13 PM

In an alternative time line, Obama can manage a budget, just the way Kirk can drive a car…

jon1979 on May 8, 2009 at 4:13 PM

I would like to thank Mr. Obama.

For diminishing, and demeaning the office of the President of the United States of America.

For tramping on the Constitution.

For showing the world, your insipid leadership, and pandering to dictators, that you emulate.

For your lies, and deceits.

For putting every citizen in this country at risk, by divulging CIA memos. This also includes the harm that will befall our Soldiers.

For spending OUR money, as if it were Christmas day for you, every day, since you took the oath.

For your lack of shame.

For your hoisting blame on everyone, but yourself.

For your lack of common sense, and intelligence.

For your pulling stunts, almost on a daily basis, to score political points.

And last, but not least….for using the office of the President, to manipulate, power grab, and pay back your debts owed, at the expense of the American taxpayers.

You will reap, what you sow, Mr. President.

capejasmine on May 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM

It also puts the union in position to crash Ford, through job actions, because they will need to eliminate the competition in order to make their new stock positions valuable enough to pay off their liabilities.

Gettelfinger has said that the UAW wants to unload the Chrysler stock as soon as possible. Nice move to announce it ahead of time. Like you don’t think the company is going to make any money…

Wethal on May 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Yes, the really big gaffe of the Obama administration so far?

This CA move.

He validated every GOP governor today.

And if they are smart, they will be working in this example in every public statement.

No, it’s not so simple as just taking the money.

No, it really does have consequences I think you won’t like soon.

Yes, I really was thinking of people.

AnninCA on May 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Couldn’t find pictures of real gangsters? Trekker?

Tennman on May 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM

That’s from “A Piece of the Action”; one of the best ST episodes, evah.

BobMbx on May 8, 2009 at 4:17 PM

Michael Barone is one brave man.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Michael Barone is going to wake up with a Horsehead in his bed.

portlandon on May 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

July 4th would be a good time to march on Washingington, rahter I mean march to Washington, to demostrate unity with our consititution and throw off the tyrant.

Zelsdorf Ragshaft on May 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

bad day for America and nary a peep from the media.

rob verdi on May 8, 2009 at 4:20 PM

So, just everybody’s gonna roll over?

I don’t get it. Does this mean they are no longer going to fight for the rule of law that says their investors are supposed to get paid back first?

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

I’m just glad none of these wimps are in my 401K.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Nice to see that you’ve come around, Ed. I’m sorry that it took something like this though.

baldilocks on May 8, 2009 at 4:21 PM

It wasn’t just Obama

Rep. John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, sent reporters a statement calling the creditors “vultures” and “rouge hedge funds.” Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm piled on, taking aim during her radio address at a “few greedy hedge funds that didn’t care how much pain the company’s failure would have inflicted on families and communities everywhere.”

Its a piece written today, I said nary a peep. Perhaps one two could be heard.

rob verdi on May 8, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Gettelfinger has said that the UAW wants to unload the Chrysler stock as soon as possible. Nice move to announce it ahead of time. Like you don’t think the company is going to make any money…

Wethal on May 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Wouldn’t you want to unload it ASAP too? With the UAW running things, it won’t be long before the stock is completely worthless. And who would know that better than Gettelfinger?

AZCoyote on May 8, 2009 at 4:22 PM

As a lifelong Chicagoan I didn’t see this coming at all.

Ted Torgerson on May 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM

You are either very sarcastic, or you are admitting a serious case of blindness.

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Michael Barone is one brave man.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM

He also writes sometimes in U,S. News and World Report, which has a wider readership than Investors Business Daily. I’d like to see this in USN&WR–it could start people wondering whether they elected an American Hugo Chavez.

Steve Z on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Gettelfinger has said that the UAW wants to unload the Chrysler stock as soon as possible. Nice move to announce it ahead of time. Like you don’t think the company is going to make any money…

Wethal on May 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Selling stock requires buyers. I wouldn’t touch that stock w/a 50 foot pole.

Either some set of suckers will buy it, or the government will (with our money).

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Think carefully about what’s happening here. The White House, presumably car czar Steven Rattner and deputy Ron Bloom, is seeking to transfer the property of one group of people to another group that is politically favored.

Think cap and trade.

Johan Klaus on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they’ve passed a law to disarm them.

Excerpt from Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand

Chainsaw56 on May 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM

It’s worse than that. The looters also demand the complicity of the victims — in a way that’s the worst part of the Randian nightmare we’re seeing.

cruadin on May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Auto-maker + Democrat = Auto-Crat

Mr Snuggle Bunny on May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM

I’d call this a Fredo Government.

Paging Al Pacino…

infidel4life on May 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM

So, just everybody’s gonna roll over?

I don’t get it. Does this mean they are no longer going to fight for the rule of law that says their investors are supposed to get paid back first?

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Law, we don’t need no stinkin’ law.

Johan Klaus on May 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Rep. John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, sent reporters a statement calling the creditors “vultures” and “rouge hedge funds.” Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm piled on, taking aim during her radio address at a “few greedy hedge funds that didn’t care how much pain the company’s failure would have inflicted on families and communities everywhere.”

Is that “rouge” (=red in French) or “rogue” hedge funds?

Whatever those creditors are, they believed enough in Chrysler or GM to lend them money, and they want it back.

Steve Z on May 8, 2009 at 4:30 PM

Barone: Welcome to the Gangster Presidency

I still think it’s more like The Benedict Arnold Precedency.

progressoverpeace on May 8, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Think carefully about what’s happening here. The White House, presumably car czar Steven Rattner and deputy Ron Bloom, is seeking to transfer the property of one group of people to another group that is politically favored.
Think cap and trade.

Johan Klaus on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

They did this exact same thing in Venezuela, and look at what a success they are! *sarcaaaasm*

capejasmine on May 8, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Isn’t doing something with someone else’s money for personal reasons a breach of fiduciary duty? It seems to me that all those non-TARP hedge funds who kneel before Zod are leaving themselves wide open to lawsuits from their clients.

cthulhu on May 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM

Selling stock requires buyers. I wouldn’t touch that stock w/a 50 foot pole.

Either some set of suckers will buy it, or the government will (with our money).

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

You have discovered the plan. Of course no one will buy the worthless Chrysler stock. Except the US Government, who will be all too willing to cash the union out of their position at a premium price. This gives the union what it wants (money), and the Obama WH gets what it wants, a super-majority equity stake in Chrysler. The union and the WH house are practically conjoined twins, so there won’t be any labor/management issues. It’s the perfect crime.

I hope GM debt holders are taking notes.

BobMbx on May 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Some of these companies may roll over, but in time the American people will rise up and put a stop to this. I just hope it is sooner than later. I will not let this man do to me what he has done to the banks and car companies. I will keep my liberty if it kills me.

bopbottle on May 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM

It’s worse than that. The looters also demand the complicity of the victims — in a way that’s the worst part of the Randian nightmare we’re seeing.
cruadin on May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Sometimes it seems like Ayn Rand and George Orwell were overly optimistic…..

[BTW, I should have put a block quote around that except – I only caught that after it was posted, sorry]

Chainsaw56 on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

The scary thing is Obama and crew are just getting started.

Most of his supporters, the MSM, Moveon etc want even more such actions. They have waited eight years and they have a very long list. If they thought they could get away with it there would be war crimes trials.

I’ll say it again, the only folks that can stop this are Dems. (Repubs are useless with the current leadership) His behavior/demands will get so outrageous that moderate Dems will finally walk. I don’t see that until his second term.

patrick neid on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

Selling stock requires buyers. I wouldn’t touch that stock w/a 50 foot pole.

Either some set of suckers will buy it, or the government will (with our money).

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

No kidding. Nor would I buy Chrysler or GM bonds. Just another example of the short-sightedness of the UAW. The new Chrysler’s cost of borrowing has just skyrocketed which won’t help the company or the union.

Although we very well may see the gov’t forcing TARP banks to buy bonds from the new Chrysler.

beancounter on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

So, just everybody’s gonna roll over?

I don’t get it. Does this mean they are no longer going to fight for the rule of law that says their investors are supposed to get paid back first?

Alana on May 8, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Let’s see if one of the represented investors sues the BK court and the fund manager and The Government of the United States, and maybe even the President himself.

BALLS ANYONE?

UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on May 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM

You have discovered the plan. Of course no one will buy the worthless Chrysler stock. Except the US Government, who will be all too willing to cash the union out of their position at a premium price. This gives the union what it wants (money), and the Obama WH gets what it wants, a super-majority equity stake in Chrysler. The union and the WH house are practically conjoined twins, so there won’t be any labor/management issues. It’s the perfect crime.

I hope GM debt holders are taking notes.

BobMbx on May 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM

You know… I had thought of that right after I made the post. Crap. First banks become conjoined twins with the government, now the UAW.

Ford is royally screwed unless they can somehow break free of the UAW (which is pretty much hopeless). The UAW will sink them in hoping of getting another ‘vehicle’ for their own quasi legal enterprise of government back money laundering.

If I was the CEO of Ford, I’d either Retire, or tell the UAW types not to dare try anything (or I’d leagally sue. Surely there’s some sort of legal action to go after a union if they’re seriously trying to sink the company right? Is there?).

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM

Hmmm, had not thought about the Ford angle with respect to unions and suppliers. I’ve had a very nice run with that one, but it might be time for me to re-think that position……

joedoe on May 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM

The new Chrysler’s cost of borrowing has just skyrocketed which won’t help the company or the union.

beancounter on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

The borrowing costs for every unionized company has just skyrocketed.

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM

He said no strings attached, not no chains attached.

That’s nuance you see.

rockhead on May 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Although we very well may see the gov’t forcing TARP banks to buy bonds from the new Chrysler.

beancounter on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

I find it interesting that the govt gave TARP money to the banks in order to protect them from bankruptcy.

Since then, the govt has been forcing the banks to give away money, hand over fist.

What happened to concerns about these banks financial well being?

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM

I thought I read earlier that these “evil” creditors were still not going to settle for 29 cents on the dollar though….yes? No?

Patrick S on May 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM

July 4th Rally for Liberty? Great idea.

LibertyBoyNYC on May 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM

BALLS ANYONE?

UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on May 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM

Hard to have them when your family is at stake. It’s one thing for me to go through something like this if it’s only my ass on the line. But when someone else’s is on the line, I seriously have to think about the consequences my actions will have on them.

Granted, it’s low-handed. Perhaps the dirtiest and oldest trick in the book. Unfortunately it’s business as usual in Gangster Thuggery.

My answer to this would be seriously to go revolutionary. BofA stockholders had information illegally withheld from them. Now we have creditors illegally barred from receiving payment. It’s outright theft, and if it isn’t, then what is?

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Think carefully about what’s happening here. The White House, presumably car czar Steven Rattner and deputy Ron Bloom, is seeking to transfer the property of one group of people to another group that is politically favored.

There’s not much to think about. Obama flat out stated in his campaign that he would redistribute wealth. It was in fact a campaign promise. Yet everyday, people seem surprised about what is happening. I’m not. He issued the threat and now he’s making good on it. Just like he promised.

Obama’s not done yet. Not by a long shot. It’s only the beginning.

Guardian on May 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Conventional wisdom has been that Ford would stand to reap the benefits of re-negotiated labor contracts brought on by the failure of GM and Chrysler. Not to mention the improved market share once the economy stabilizes. However, if unions will now own 2 out of 3 and have the government as a partner, what kind of market will Ford be looking at in 2010?

Much to think about……

joedoe on May 8, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Obama employs the Chicago way.

BHO Jonestown on May 8, 2009 at 4:46 PM

bad day for America and nary a peep from the media.

rob verdi on May 8, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Oh come on!! They’re too busy looking for dirt on anyone who stands up to their Statist agenda.

They don’t have time to be concerned with silly concepts like Property rights

Chainsaw56 on May 8, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Now that’s a nice scam.
Unions force a company into bankruptcy.
Through the bankruptcy process, the govt gives the company to the unions.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

I’m still looking for a good exit. This ball game is over.

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Wait until the UAW finds out Obama is going to force Chrysler to make cars that are basically windmill-powered roller skates.

Daggett on May 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM

I thought I read earlier that these “evil” creditors were still not going to settle for 29 cents on the dollar though….yes? No?

Patrick S on May 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM

As of today, enough will, so that the rest have to.

Wethal on May 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM

United States of America
1776 – 2009
Rest in Peace

TheBigOldDog on May 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM

“All right, boys, the Federation’s Government’s movin’ in, we’re takin’ over. You play ball, we’ll cut you in for a piece of the pie. If ya don’t, you’re out – all the way out, y’know what I mean?”

AverageJoe on May 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM

The borrowing costs for every unionized company has just skyrocketed.

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Why do you think they pushed for TARP first?

If I were a bank with TARP funds (and I haven’t paid them back yet) I would expect a knock on my office door by the feds at some point demanding I approve some previously denied loans. I’ll ask for the specifics, and they show me a loan I denied for a Unionized company. When they ask me why, I’ll simply tell them: I saw what you feds did to Chrysler lenders. I wouldn’t lend money to them for my life.

Then I’d wake up the next day with a phone call from the FDIC board basically telling me to make the loan or I lose FDIC backing. That’s practically a death sentence to a bank.

Now what?

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM

I have to buy a car in the near future. GM and Chrysler are off the list. Too soon to tell for sure with Ford.

pedestrian on May 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Obama’s not done yet. Not by a long shot. It’s only the beginning.

Guardian on May 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Everyone wants to change the world if it won’t cost them anything.

Tax the Rich! Feed the Poor! ‘Til there ain’t no Rich no More!

I wished Obama well so long as he didn’t do crap like this. I’m dropping all pretense now: He needs to fail.

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Then I’d wake up the next day with a phone call from the FDIC board basically telling me to make the loan or I lose FDIC backing. That’s practically a death sentence to a bank.

Now what?

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Since you have TARP (really TRAP) money, they’d simply fire you and put in their own CEO.

TheBigOldDog on May 8, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Since you have TARP (really TRAP) money, they’d simply fire you and put in their own CEO.

TheBigOldDog on May 8, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Funny you should mention that.

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 4:55 PM

“All right, boys, the Federation’s Government’s movin’ in, we’re takin’ over. You play ball, we’ll cut you in for a piece of the pie. If ya don’t, you’re out – all the way out, y’know what I mean?”
AverageJoe on May 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM

Hence, “Heater” sales are WAY up…

Chainsaw56 on May 8, 2009 at 4:56 PM

I have to buy a car in the near future. GM and Chrysler are off the list. Too soon to tell for sure with Ford.

pedestrian on May 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Get a foreign car. Government Motors/Chrysler will destroy Ford, not by offering superior products, but through shady UAW practices meant to get rid of the only non-government auto maker left.

Daggett on May 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Get a foreign car. Government Motors/Chrysler will destroy Ford, not by offering superior products, but through shady UAW practices meant to get rid of the only non-government auto maker left.

Daggett on May 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM

May I also add: get them now! BEFORE the tariffs and the taxes go up.

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 5:03 PM

UAW and CEObama my GM days are over. I have bought nothing but GM cars and Trucks my hole life…….No More!

try again later on May 8, 2009 at 5:03 PM

Who will get the mobsters on the blower and beam them out?

Feedie on May 8, 2009 at 5:03 PM

Everyone made fun of Illinois for electing a Chicago thug but now you’ve learned how it happens. Was anyone afraid to speak ill of GWB? Why not? Because there was no penalty and GWB didn’t operate that way, he was a patriot. Now we have a respected business man who fears speaking out due to repurcussions to his company. If the press doesn’t reform itself and print both sides of an issue and make diverse viewpoints known our great nation will end up second banana to Fidel and his little brother.

Herb on May 8, 2009 at 5:03 PM

I’m just glad none of these wimps are in my 401K.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 4:20 PM

I don’t know how to say this gently but your 401k itself might not be safe from plunder. At this point(loss of contract sanctity), anything is fair game, and Barry is going to trying to squeeze blood out of every turnip he can find.

a capella on May 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Michael Barone departs from his normally moderate tone

Well, during the campaign Barone did warn about “the coming thugocracy”. He was right on the money.

ddrintn on May 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Steve Z on May 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Yeah, I’ve read his stuff in USN&WR also.

I would be surprised if they would print an article like that.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM

I don’t know how to say this gently but your 401k itself might not be safe from plunder. At this point(loss of contract sanctity), anything is fair game, and Barry is going to trying to squeeze blood out of every turnip he can find.

a capella on May 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Thank goodness I just started putting into it and they won’t get much.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Thank goodness I just started putting into it and they won’t get much.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Well stop!

Buy Gold or Silver, or anything else that tends to hold value. Putting earnings into a cash based system is now suicide.

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 5:18 PM

Yeah buddy.

Barack Obama, Federalism, and a Winning Coalition
Yossef Ben-Meir
April 12, 2008
Barack Obama´s community organizing background in Chicago gives him a special opportunity to expand his base of support to include the millions of Republican and Independent voters who identify closely with the principles of federalism. Federalism, a founding precept of the Republican Party more than 150 years ago and currently often lauded by the party´s presidential candidate Senator John McCain, involves deference to states and localities in the management of their own affairs and social programs.

Har har.

The Federalist Papers
Wed, 11/05/2008 – 10:40pm — Wolfman456

I was talking to a friend today that didn’t know what the federalist papers were. I want to know how many people honestly don’t know what they are. I was suprised, and I wanted to know if I had the right to be suprised.

Speakup on May 8, 2009 at 5:18 PM

Chaz706 on May 8, 2009 at 5:18 PM

If my company stops the match, I will. But in the meantime, I will look into that. My former boss was into gold/silver big time.

ladyingray on May 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Yo! Barone!Tanks for helpin’ me put it on dees homees. The only thing missing is all the bling, tat’s, and body piercing. I can see venders in the streets of D.C. now offering tattoos, cheap jewelry, and piercing services.
I’ll bet Obama looks bitchin in low riding pants!

Cybergeezer on May 8, 2009 at 5:28 PM

What does the MSM do when this all goes into the crapper?

d1carter on May 8, 2009 at 5:31 PM

Didn’t the press rage a while ago about how out-of-touch the automaker CEOs were to have spent all that money flying on private jets to Washington to beg for taxpayer money??

What should we say when the government starts asking us for more money when they use their private jets (BIG private jets) to take some souvenir photos?

AverageJoe on May 8, 2009 at 5:32 PM

I don’t know how to say this gently but your 401k itself might not be safe from plunder.
a capella on May 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM

I never thought I’d say this, but it looks like even the middle class is going to start to need offshore banks.

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 5:33 PM

Didn’t the press rage a while ago about how out-of-touch the automaker CEOs were to have spent all that money flying on private jets to Washington to beg for taxpayer money??

What should we say when the government starts asking us for more money when they use their private jets (BIG private jets) to take some souvenir photos?

Sorry, wrong thread… but oddly still relevant.

AverageJoe on May 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM

Economic recovery is just around the corner.

Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

GarandFan on May 8, 2009 at 5:51 PM

As a lifelong Chicagoan I didn’t see this coming at all.

Ted Torgerson on May 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM

You’re kidding, right!? Otherwise you’ve been living in a cave in Chicago. Anyone who was paying attention during the campaign, saw this coming just by looking at zero’s friends and associates. A leopard doesn’t change its spots.

If your comment was serious, then I’ll assume you voted for this crap. Here’s a hint; next time, whoever the mainstream media is promoting, vote for the opponent.

SoldiersMom on May 8, 2009 at 5:54 PM

Dictator of the United States
Ditator in Chief

Now I know how Venezuella felt while they watched Hugo take over.

lwssdd on May 8, 2009 at 5:55 PM

First they came for the bankers and I said nothing because I was not a banker, then they came for the car manufacturers and I said nothing because I was not a car manufacturer……

This is getting untenible.

ihasurnominashun on May 8, 2009 at 5:55 PM

Michael Barone is going to wake up with a Horsehead in his bed.

portlandon on May 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

If this administration is a bunch of gangsters, they’re the sissiest gangsters ever. The only guy that even pretends to be tough is a 5’6″ Jewish ballerina. The mob boss is a sissy who has never lifted a gun, whose Mom was a white, hippy Marxist. He was raised by his Grandma. They’re more like a bunch of bitchy transvestites.

But they control the media, and they use it to craft a powerful propaganda. They have no integrity, no shame, no morals, and no ethics.

No, their won’t be any horse heads. But the only thing that will control them is getting the truth into the brains of an astonishingly ignorant and passive electorate.

Jaibones on May 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM

PIMF – there

Jaibones on May 8, 2009 at 5:57 PM

The borrowing costs for every unionized company has just skyrocketed.

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM

I hadn’t thought it through that far but of course you’re right. Some smart money manager should start a corporate bond fund for non-union, non-TARP corporations. I bet money would flock to it and that would be a free-market middle finger to unions and this government meddling.

beancounter on May 8, 2009 at 5:57 PM

They are not just bad guys, they are inept bad guys.

Terrye on May 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM

Since then, the govt has been forcing the banks to give away money, hand over fist.

What happened to concerns about these banks financial well being?

MarkTheGreat on May 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM

And yet they prevent banks from paying bonuses to employees who actually make them money. It’s insane…

beancounter on May 8, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I’ll say it again, the only folks that can stop this are Dems. (Repubs are useless with the current leadership) His behavior/demands will get so outrageous that moderate Dems will finally walk. I don’t see that until his second term.

patrick neid on May 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM

That would require courage, something you rarely find in moderates.

PackerBronco on May 8, 2009 at 6:02 PM

If this administration is a bunch of gangsters, they’re the sissiest gangsters ever. The only guy that even pretends to be tough is a 5′6″ Jewish ballerina. The mob boss is a sissy who has never lifted a gun, whose Mom was a white, hippy Marxist. He was raised by his Grandma. They’re more like a bunch of bitchy transvestites.

Jaibones on May 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM

LOL!

progressoverpeace on May 8, 2009 at 6:43 PM

Comment pages: 1 2