Why is the head of Moomoo McTwinkie on this thread?

BillaryMcBush on May 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM

I try not to laugh at name calling but I got 2 give you credit for being creative in your insults. That is funny.

this is a political party, not a crisis pregnancy center.

Funny how “progressives” talk out one side of their mouth about leaving social issues at the door, then out the other side of their mouth they go on and on about sex. Sheesh.

Lehosh on May 8, 2009 at 7:01 AM

This is awesome.

I particularly like the part where she asserts that Republicans won’t “talk openly” about problems like teen sex, teen pregnancy, and alternative family structures that other people “deal with rationally.”

I don’t know a single soul who has the least bit of difficulty talking about these issues. We just insist on civilized behavior; and for some reason, whoever it is that uttered the nonsense at the top of this thread thinks civilized behavior is “irrational.”

This is the mealy-mouthed dissembling they use because they want to disguise the fact — and fact, it is — that they genuinely approve of all those irresponsible acts they pretend to oppose.

How come Ms. McCain’s ‘honesty’ never seems to spotlight on the democraps?

eaglewingz08 on May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM

That would be hilarious. They would drop her immediately and then she would have to, gasp, get a job.

Meghan’s found her shtick, and she’s shticking with it.

Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Maybe, Allahpundit could shtick it to her and give us a break.

I don’t understand the grecian style dress thing…confused..

Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Our boy asked her what she was wearing to the WH Press Correspondent’s Dinner. He needed to know so he could advise her as to a hair accessory, which he refers to as a “headdress.” Ever since he saw that stupid headband she wore on Larry King, he’s been obsessed with it. If only he knew how much that crap cost.

“A friend of mine, whose father is also a conservative politician, used to joke it would be easier for her be a lesbian because then there would be no risk of getting pregnant and having a resulting scandal.

So Meg-Mac is friends with Cheney’s daughter?

We live in a big world, one where you can contract a life-long STD, have an unplanned pregnancy, or get date-raped, just to name a few of the dangerous results of having sex. We should prepare our kids for it, realistically.

Maybe the best way to prepare our “kids” (daughters) for that is to inform them of the dangers, so they have the strength to say “no” until they are ready to assume motherhood.

Rather than Meg-Mac who dabbles in politics with her father’s name, tries to be “sexy” and has no idea what she’s talking about, a better advocate for sex education is Bristol Palin, who has been scandalized by her ex-boyfriend and the media eager to heap shame on her mother. Bristol Palin has the courage to admit that she made a big mistake and has learned her lesson, and is telling adolescent girls “DON’T do what I did–see how much trouble it gave me and my Mom!” Bristol Palin can connect with girls far better then Meg-Mac, because Palin knows the consequences of a bad decision.

Suggestion for AllahPundit: Why don’t you do conservatives a favor and marry Meg-Mac and live happily ever after, and leave the political blogging to Ed Morrissey?

We live in a big world, one where you can contract a life-long STD, have an unplanned pregnancy, or get date-raped, just to name a few of the dangerous results of having sex.

Wouldn’t this be a good argument for not having pre-marital sex?

Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 7:54 AM

God bless you and your child.

How come Ms. McCain’s ‘honesty’ never seems to spotlight on the democraps?

eaglewingz08 on May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Meghan’s found her shtick, and she’s shticking with it.

I don’t understand what makes them think that we are so completely separated from “real issues” and “real people” with “real problems”. Hello!!! Sheesh, these libs should really try to get out of the house more.

Cheesestick on May 8, 2009 at 4:40 AM

Like most liberals, Meghan is obnoxiously arrogant and believes that the only reason one would disagree with her is ignorance. Smart people would be “worldly” and liberal just like her!

Unless this is all just basically complaining because they can’t just abort without consequences, which just seems childish.

She is not a loose cannon. She is embedded in the daddy crony society that sold out the Constitution in order to look bipartisan. She is not that delicious a Delilah, just a bleached blonde daddy’s little girl party Barbie Chatty Cathy. It isn’t that she has nothing to say. It IS that she has nothing NEW to say, and is saying the MSM mantra ad nauseum. Whatever ugliness she attributes to Conservatives are her own hangups with her own daddy, not ours.

That pretty much raps it up… And for anyone that thinks we are singling out MegMac, you pointed out that she’s not alone.

So will he prove penitent for having cursed America with the Homeland Security fascist takeover of our Constitutional Government? Surely I jest.

maverick muse on May 8, 2009 at 8:41 AM

That’s so un-Kewl to apologize for making government larger… ask Colin.

Repubs are trotting out Meghan McCain as the new GOP.

shomegirl on May 8, 2009 at 12:02 AM

Repubs, well noted WHICH ‘pubs are selling Meghan as the “new” Pub Face.

She is not a loose cannon. She is embedded in the daddy crony society that sold out the Constitution in order to look bipartisan. She is not that delicious a Delilah, just a bleached blonde daddy’s little girl party Barbie Chatty Cathy. It isn’t that she has nothing to say. It IS that she has nothing NEW to say, and is saying the MSM mantra ad nauseum. Whatever ugliness she attributes to Conservatives are her own hangups with her own daddy, not ours. John McCain, if nothing else, over indulges for popularity in the good ol’ boys club that loves a whore.

BTW, Tom Ridge pulled out of his campaign to campaign vs. Specter. Actually, he was not going to campaign against Specter; his campaign was vs. Tancredo, lobbying against the NEW GENERATION OF GOP STRENGTH. Interesting to note that he chose to await another opportunity. So will he prove penitent for having cursed America with the Homeland Security fascist takeover of our Constitutional Government? Surely I jest.

that the Palin’s do

punctuation-challenged this morning.

don’t want my daughter to feel pressured into having sex because she has been taught how to put a condom on a banana in second grade and some guy can hand her the morning after pills. Seriously, this obsession with sex and birth control does young women no good. It doesn’t give them “choices” — all it does is make the choice of saying no harder.

Blake on May 8, 2009 at 8:03 AM

The hyper sexualization of kids is concerning. The left has done a bang up (no pun) job on them in the public screwel (heh, Rush) system and we see those results. Why is this never, ever leftist’s fault? Why can we not fault the liberal, sexual indoctrination of kids via media and public school? No, we need MORE!!!! And, while we are at it, lets also tell elementary school kids about the joys of gay sex, too.

But, Meghan must, once again, contradict anything and everything that the Palin’s do…even subtly. She has this ridiculously garish cross she bears to prove SHE is so cool and different than those back woods Palins and other uninformed, uncool republican families who merely cling to guns and religion. I knew girls like this in High School and college…and I felt sorry for them…but I avoided them like the plague because, wow…EVERYBODY knew how desperate they were.

Allah, I know you put her out there for your comment quota…but…giving her more air time isn’t helpful. That is, unless you are totally fine with the mocking and marginalizing of your own party base. That is sad…but, not totally unexpected.

Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 7:54 AM

+1000 and God bless you!

I also like how much authority she commands on parenting. How many kids does she have anyway?

Buy Danish on May 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM

I don’t understand the grecian style dress thing…confused..

Enjoy!

Think about it. If you support polygamy, then unless you have a 2 (or more) girls born for every male; then there is going to be issues.

I wouldn’t even get into the financial instability of such arrangements. That a single provider (male) is going to have trouble supporting multiple wives and multiple offspring.

lorien1973 on May 7, 2009 at 10:40 PM

I give you Exhibit A.