Quotes of the day
posted at 10:30 pm on May 7, 2009 by Allahpundit
“A friend of mine, whose father is also a conservative politician, used to joke it would be easier for her be a lesbian because then there would be no risk of getting pregnant and having a resulting scandal.
I have always found this joke incredibly sad—for both of us. Because the GOP continues to struggle with open communication about serious issues most people deal with rationally, and on a regular basis. Unless we learn how to integrate that kind of discussion, our party will continue its descent into irrelevance. We live in a big world, one where you can contract a life-long STD, have an unplanned pregnancy, or get date-raped, just to name a few of the dangerous results of having sex. We should prepare our kids for it, realistically. Then they might be more apt to make the right choices when they live in it themselves. Bottom line: honesty isn’t a liberal or conservative issue. It’s a human one. The sooner we realize that, the better off we’ll be.”
***
“Valerie White, executive director of the Sexual Freedom Legal Defense and Education Fund, a legal-defense fund for people with alternative sexual expression in Sharon, Massachusetts, says she believes that triads are actually a great way to raise a family. ‘Years ago, children didn’t get raised in dyads, they got raised with grandparents and aunts and uncles—it was much looser and more village-like,’ says White. ‘I think a lot more people are finding that polyamory is a way to recapture that kind of support.’ For a year, Loving More’s Trask and her then-husband were both involved with another woman, who was a part of the family. Trask’s three children knew all about it. ‘I’m totally out,’ says Trask.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
They should do an activity. Volunteer to be abortion mill escorts, maybe?
Kensington on May 7, 2009 at 11:58 PM
This is not a shot at you, but the sentiment of your comment…
I am still waiting for the day when AllahPundit pimps out Paris McCain for blog hits and comments and I can click on the link an hour after it’s been posted and see that there are no comments on the thread.
Want Paris McCain off of HotAir, stop commenting on her posts. When it comes down to it, regardless of the ideology of AllahPundit, he has a job to do. If certain posts do not get blog hits and comments, he will be forced to stop posting on those particular topics as they are not worth the bandwidth.
Really, I don’t know who is more dense, Paris McCain or the commentors who complain about AllahPundit posting her drivel, yet come here to comment on her threads over and over and over and over again.
Michael in MI on May 7, 2009 at 11:59 PM
There used to be this thing called the scold’s bridle ….
OldEnglish on May 8, 2009 at 12:00 AM
If I never hear Meghan McCain’s name again….it would be too soon.
terryannonline on May 8, 2009 at 12:00 AM
I’m going with Dennis Miller. He says he is calling himself an Independent due to the fact that the Repubs are trotting out Meghan McCain as the new GOP.
shomegirl on May 8, 2009 at 12:02 AM
She really has that adolescent egomania down pat.
ronsfi on May 8, 2009 at 12:03 AM
OhmyfreakinGOD! Stop. My stomach hurts.
Rhinoboy on May 8, 2009 at 12:03 AM
What we should talk about is the fact that someone is trying to shut down Piper Palin’s lemonade stand.
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/05/juneau-resident-attempts-to-close-down.html
shomegirl on May 8, 2009 at 12:04 AM
The only think I object to here is your assumption that people commenting and complaining don’t realize that they’re contributing to the problem by responding.
I’m sure most of us get it. It’s just that some of us can’t yet resist. The desire to point out how worthless are Meghan’s “insights” and prescriptions is like a siren call, unfortunately.
That will hopefully change, but I think you’re incorrect in assuming that we don’t understand the problem.
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Was he really objecting to Meghan specifically? That gives me warm fuzzies.
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 12:08 AM
Oh my goodness! O, I will never get over how loathsome some people can be. A little girl’s lemonade stand!
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Well, I, for one, am not complaining about these posts…I think they are very serious and have a direct impact on the future of the Republican party and the conservative movement. Let’s have more Meg-Meg posts, as far as I’m concerned…let’s see how much substance she has…then we can better answer those who think she is our future.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:11 AM
And, then there is that physiology synchronization thing.
a capella on May 8, 2009 at 12:12 AM
The praise of honesty is on everyone’s lips, and I do imagine the praise is often heartfelt. I won’t bother to praise honesty; I have people to do that for me. Moreover, I think understanding is best served in the long run by prudent combinations of honesty, fraud, discretion, inwardness, hiddenness, disguise, dissembling, and anonymity.
Kralizec on May 8, 2009 at 12:12 AM
We can discuss the future of the Republican Party without discussing Meghan McCain. The two are no synonymous.
terryannonline on May 8, 2009 at 12:15 AM
Not really…she is now being put forward as the solution to our problem by many pundits and the MSM…we need to be able to answer. Light is the best disinfectant.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Is he up yonder or down in the dell?
He always did say for climate go to Heaven, for company go to Hell
PercyB on May 8, 2009 at 12:19 AM
I don’t know of any serious political pundit that is labeling her the future of the Republican Party. She writes about fluff, really.
terryannonline on May 8, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Pundit and m.mccain could probably spend hours upon hours talking about how much the gop sucks.
therightwinger on May 8, 2009 at 12:25 AM
I did not know Allah had a crush on MegMac…so this is why he gives her posts on this well known site that has such a good rep and that is quoted by prominent conservatives like Rush?
Allah, Should you be ruining the HA brand lifting up such a totally self centered, ignorant and naive liberal in denial?
CCRWM on May 8, 2009 at 12:25 AM
Well, let me stand up for AllahP again here…not that he needs or wants my help…I posted what I did from Meg-Meg’s twitter because it shows she’s a twit. I was not trying to drag AllahP into it at all.
For those interested, go read his twitter where he admantly and eloquently defends his criticisms of Meg-Meg to a friend of his who is a Meg-Meg supporter.
It clearly shows he is a gentleman who finds Meg-Meg charming. I don’t, but I admire that in another human being.
So, it’s an ‘awwwwwww’ moment to be sure…but he stands up for us…his readers…the Republican base too.
I admire him a great deal. So, I’m not sympathetic to any cheap shots sent his way…and he get’s a ton of them every day and still get’s up every morning and gives us great content.
So, that’s where I am.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Well, I guess you should define ‘serious political pundit’ then…she’s certainly being sold by the left and the MSM.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:28 AM
BTW, I’m not at all unsympathetic to your view…but I think the more Meg-Meg is exposed, the more she is seen for what she is…a media whore. Thus, she is disarmed.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:31 AM
Meghan McCain is destroying my HA experience.
Good night.
Saltysam on May 8, 2009 at 12:33 AM
I don’t hate Meghan McCain or anything like that. I actually might agree with her on a couple of things. That’s not the point. I just don’t find her insightful, that’s all.
terryannonline on May 8, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Hawkdriver! Be safe. Be smart. Be successful. Prayers for you and all in harms way devoting themselves to defending America.
Loxodonta on May 8, 2009 at 12:34 AM
I don’t think you did either…I don’t ‘hate’ her…though I can’t find much, that she says, that I agree with. But yes, she doesn’t have any more substance than Paris Hilton in the arena of politics. She’s just to vain and narcissistic to realize it.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:37 AM
You know what? I think I killed this thread…thank me later.
AUINSC on May 8, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Thanks.
Loxodonta on May 8, 2009 at 12:44 AM
She will continue like this until noone covers or comments on. Expect the MSM to try to get as much mileage out of her as possible and expect AP to keep posting about it. So, in other words, we’re stuck with her and these posts.
TBinSTL on May 8, 2009 at 12:52 AM
That pic of MeggieMac is hot. No lie.
daesleeper on May 8, 2009 at 12:58 AM
This is aggravating… third time’s a charm, and if my other comments magically show up later, then sorry! I don’t think they’re going to moderation, though.
For you “Paris McCain” folks… you’ve forgotten that Paris Hilton had the best energy policy of the campaign. Go watch the campaign ad at Funny or Die. Hilarious, but also very sensible and cogent.
If Meggie Mac were doing that, suggesting actual sensible and specific policy changes instead of just lamenting how much we suck, I’d cheer her on.
Laura on May 8, 2009 at 12:59 AM
Meg Meg isn’t going to go away..
I see a seat on The View in her future
DaveC on May 8, 2009 at 1:02 AM
this is what we are dealing with, a typical communique from the left:
http://snipr.com/blecht
Sorry if it offends anyone, but after reading the current topic it seems mild.
The whole executive branch is flooded with people like this.
eaglesdontflock on May 8, 2009 at 1:03 AM
Why is she a Republican, exactly?
WisCon on May 8, 2009 at 1:06 AM
just stop it please allah……
R D on May 8, 2009 at 1:08 AM
I think that the GOP just has to recognize that there are echoes. For example, there’s nothing wrong with anyone saying, “It’s OK to postpone sex.” That echoes in people’s minds back to the day when the “moral majority” insisted that any hint that teens were sexual would encourage more sex. Sex is just instinctual. Teens couldn’t stop that train if they wanted. They are hard-wired.
I thought Meghan’s remarks about Republicans not being able to discuss sex was just plain ridiculous. But I have said repeatedly, it’s not ridiculous when you’re her age. She’s just a kid, blah-blahing like we all did at her age. We all thought we were the generation to discover sex.
I think I was lucky, since my mom was very pragmatic. She said, “This business of condoms has been a fight between men and women since the day they were invented.” LOL*
Gee, an era later, she’s still right.
AnninCA on May 8, 2009 at 1:08 AM
I’m with ya there. I think, and hope, much of the criticism is meant in good fun.
mikeyboss on May 8, 2009 at 1:32 AM
Right. Rush use to refer to AP as “oddball” — now he refers to him as that “horny oddball.”
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 1:40 AM
NOW can I comment??
Laura on May 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM
Man, MeggieMac is hawt.
……what, there’s more to her than looks? Yeah, didn’t think so.
CatsGodot on May 8, 2009 at 2:05 AM
By the way, polyamory will be the next generation’s push. :)
I deal with this now in my personal life. I can already tell you, no big deal, folks.
AnninCA on May 8, 2009 at 2:51 AM
I have terminated all further contact with the output of M. McCain.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste
entagor on May 8, 2009 at 3:04 AM
I think if the democraps took to openly murdering jewish folk Meghan McCain would probably say “well, if we only kill a few we could really grow the party, we’d have a LOT more in common! Come on! Lets be open minded!”
Spiritk9 on May 8, 2009 at 3:19 AM
“We live in a big world, one where you can contract a life-long STD, have an unplanned pregnancy, or get date-raped, just to name a few of the dangerous results of having sex.”
I am so sick of liberal democrats acting like we here on the right don’t know any gay people or people that have babies out of wedlock. We have family members, friends, neighbors & co-workers too, just like they do. We deal with these issues not just on society’s level or in our govt. But for many of us (possibly all of us?) it is way down deep & personal…..right here in our own lives with people that we know. I don’t understand what makes them think that we are so completely separated from “real issues” and “real people” with “real problems”. Hello!!! Sheesh, these libs should really try to get out of the house more.
Cheesestick on May 8, 2009 at 4:40 AM
The rest of us are perfectly aware of Mcshamnesty’s daughters “substance”, and we find it to be non-existent. So responding to her idiocy only gives it credibility. This is why we don’t argue with piles of dog shit that appear on our front lawns. The only difference between her and the dog shit is that we will give it enough attention to have it removed. She is less important than that.
csdeven on May 8, 2009 at 6:18 AM
AP, enough with this twit already. Obsessed, much?
ErinF on May 8, 2009 at 6:23 AM
Since the national shame of electing that despicable Marxist ChimpyO, the liberals have been getting increasingly bolder in their behavior. AP is no different. He has become more and more anti-conservative since ChimpO was elected.
csdeven on May 8, 2009 at 6:25 AM
You know who I am really missing the Bush twins.
We didn’t know how good we had it until Megan McCain came along.
peterargus on May 8, 2009 at 6:48 AM
Newsflash for Chubs McCain: this is a political party, not a crisis pregnancy center.
Funny how “progressives” talk out one side of their mouth about leaving social issues at the door, then out the other side of their mouth they go on and on about sex. Sheesh.
Lehosh on May 8, 2009 at 7:01 AM
When is Meghan McCain going to just go away? Or more appropriately, when will the media LET her go away?
RWLA on May 8, 2009 at 7:21 AM
Attack Obama, then I will express myself, chicky poo.
ProudPalinFan on May 8, 2009 at 7:29 AM
She is not, she just claims to be one to sow confusion.
darktood on May 8, 2009 at 7:37 AM
What’s up with APs obsession with this twenty-something blowhard?
CarolynM on May 8, 2009 at 7:40 AM
Actually, John McCain would have done America a huge favor if he’d told the reporter to leave teen-Meghan out of the interview, to respect the girl’s privacy.
Progressives (Meghan) have a major hang-up when claiming that “Abstinence Only” means that abstinence is the only acceptable conservative birth control measure. Abstinence is the only sure way to stay not pregnant and not infected by STD (abstinence from sexual activity, not simply intercourse), as Meghan wrote. That is merely a fact; that does NOT mean that conservatives may not utilize other measures.
That education would be best left within the family. Schools are NOT in the business of emotionally bonding with children except to exploit them. The media is absolutely in the business of exploiting people, so there’s not reason to entrust the media or educators with the parental custodial role that they’ve already usurped.
BTW, Meghan, that “girlfriend” story is your own, which is fine, but ‘fess up since you pulled it out to sell your message.
maverick muse on May 8, 2009 at 7:41 AM
Because nothing stinks of dishonesty than telling youth that sexual relationships are fleeting before marriage, that abortion is murder and abstinence is so much more rewarding, once you’ve delayed gratification until the proper time.
Wretched, filthy lies!!!!
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 7:42 AM
Where is she(Meg)coming up with these ideas? Sounds as if she’s started to get her ideas of how conservatives think from the lefty media. I guess it’s escaped her how supportive most of us are about Bristol Palin for example, it’s the left tearing her apart. While some conservatives are biased against homosexuals,most are not. When it comes to bias,some of the left have their own pet hate projects–servicemen, people who don’t embrace their ideas,evangelicals….et al. Meghan is rapidly descending into irrelevancy by her repeated insistence that large numbers(if not all )of the conservative arm of the GOP are narrow minded folks. We aren’t and I’m tired of hearing her say so. My leeway for Meghan’s immaturity is exhausted. She is a shallow, attention seeking, deliberately trouble causing, immature, misinformed and stupid big mouth.
jeanie on May 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM
Meghan speaks from her own experience, referencing her own protected childhood. Fine, but Meghan’s experience is not the rule.
Who is resistant to discussing access to birth control? NOT the GOP. Not Republican leaders. Not the majority of Repubicans or the majority of Conservatives. Don’t “fill me in” with dogma that we respect. We respect responsibility, and that most definitely includes home schooled sex education and medical appointments.
Universal Healthcare socialized medicine:
Besides the Feds having everyone’s DNA to exploit, they’d be as abusive with your medical records as they’ve already proven abusive with all sorts of confidential records reported to the press in order to ruin people. Little Suzie can’t enjoy privacy because her medical records are a matter of school knowledge.
maverick muse on May 8, 2009 at 7:53 AM
You know? This is good. I like this. Let the church be the one to tell the truth. Our light will be brighter…we shall see who the liars are and who is honest about humanity.
For the record, my abstinence-only parents raised me to be chaste. I broke that pledge after high school and made my own choices. I was on bc and finally determined to stop with the wild lifestyle…when, lo and behold, I was raped and conceived my first child. My christian Republican parents were warm and supported me and were 100% by my side, regardless of my past.
This argument is personal.
Was my decision to live like the world says to live their fault? Or my own? Are stds, unplanned pregnancies, and emotional scars from broken relationships parents’ fault or the teen who choses the go in the opposite way?
My sister and brother were raised in the same household. We are all honest with each other and they were virgins when they got married, were super popular but never got wrecked even in college and never did drugs.
Choices.
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 7:54 AM
1. She’s a rino; he’s a rino.
2. We hate her, therefore, he likes her.
3. Rumor has it he likes girls.
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 8:00 AM
I don’t want my daughter to feel pressured into having sex because she has been taught how to put a condom on a banana in second grade and some guy can hand her the morning after pills. Seriously, this obsession with sex and birth control does young women no good. It doesn’t give them “choices” — all it does is make the choice of saying no harder.
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 8:03 AM
AP must be attracted to immature women. This little girl has the maturity of a 12 year old. Enough.
apoole on May 8, 2009 at 8:04 AM
The real sad thing is that she actually believes what she’s saying.
The GOP is limping in terms of power, but it is not marching towards irrelevance.
“Irrelevance” is a relevant term, politically speaking. Something I am surprise Ms. McCain doesn’t grasp.
bluelightbrigade on May 8, 2009 at 8:12 AM
Agreed. But she wants us to do even more – “educate” our young daughters about all the deviant aspects of sex because God forbid they have any healthy expectations of a loving intimate relationship. So why stop with date rape? Lets make sure they consider gang rape. In fact, we could bring science into it and ask our girls to formulate a mathematical equation about their chances of getting STDs with a date rape vs gang rape. I mean, it’s all about dialogue and education.
After the rape consequences, we can launch into the whole host of foreplay options open to them. We Republicans should cease being foreplayophobic.
Then, let’s get into how it’s ok to dabble in a little girl on girl petting.
And let’s be sure to instill in our daughters that men are opportunistic predators never to be trusted.
And never forget to emphasize that sex has nothing to do with love, intimacy, commitment or responsibility.
We Rebublicans owe it to our daughters to have as perverse and self destructive view of sex as liberal women have. Only then will Ms. McCain be satisfied.
CarolynM on May 8, 2009 at 8:12 AM
Neither did I, but Meghan is the authoritay, so I well defer to her.
When I read that my first thought was of Cameron Diaz in Something About Mary.
As for those of you who complain about AP leaving quotes from people you don’t like…
What’s annoying to me is to know that you would prefer a de facto censorship of people you find annoying. Putting your fingers in your ears will not make the problem go away, and only serves to provide people like Meghan an easy victory.
Buy Danish on May 8, 2009 at 8:13 AM
I give you Exhibit A.
soundingboard on May 8, 2009 at 8:23 AM
I don’t understand the grecian style dress thing…confused..
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 8:24 AM
Can this girl do anything but question republicans? And, more specifically, can she do anything but ever-so-slightly criticize the Palins?
I also like how much authority she commands on parenting. How many kids does she have anyway?
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 8:28 AM
+1000 and God bless you!
pugwriter on May 8, 2009 at 8:31 AM
The hyper sexualization of kids is concerning. The left has done a bang up (no pun) job on them in the public screwel (heh, Rush) system and we see those results. Why is this never, ever leftist’s fault? Why can we not fault the liberal, sexual indoctrination of kids via media and public school? No, we need MORE!!!! And, while we are at it, lets also tell elementary school kids about the joys of gay sex, too.
But, Meghan must, once again, contradict anything and everything that the Palin’s do…even subtly. She has this ridiculously garish cross she bears to prove SHE is so cool and different than those back woods Palins and other uninformed, uncool republican families who merely cling to guns and religion. I knew girls like this in High School and college…and I felt sorry for them…but I avoided them like the plague because, wow…EVERYBODY knew how desperate they were.
Allah, I know you put her out there for your comment quota…but…giving her more air time isn’t helpful. That is, unless you are totally fine with the mocking and marginalizing of your own party base. That is sad…but, not totally unexpected.
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 8:35 AM
punctuation-challenged this morning.
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM
Being a cough moderate doesn’t mean you job is to beat up on your party.
tomas on May 8, 2009 at 8:39 AM
Repubs, well noted WHICH ‘pubs are selling Meghan as the “new” Pub Face.
She is not a loose cannon. She is embedded in the daddy crony society that sold out the Constitution in order to look bipartisan. She is not that delicious a Delilah, just a bleached blonde daddy’s little girl party Barbie Chatty Cathy. It isn’t that she has nothing to say. It IS that she has nothing NEW to say, and is saying the MSM mantra ad nauseum. Whatever ugliness she attributes to Conservatives are her own hangups with her own daddy, not ours. John McCain, if nothing else, over indulges for popularity in the good ol’ boys club that loves a whore.
BTW, Tom Ridge pulled out of his campaign to campaign vs. Specter. Actually, he was not going to campaign against Specter; his campaign was vs. Tancredo, lobbying against the NEW GENERATION OF GOP STRENGTH. Interesting to note that he chose to await another opportunity. So will he prove penitent for having cursed America with the Homeland Security fascist takeover of our Constitutional Government? Surely I jest.
maverick muse on May 8, 2009 at 8:41 AM
That pretty much raps it up… And for anyone that thinks we are singling out MegMac, you pointed out that she’s not alone.
That’s so un-Kewl to apologize for making government larger… ask Colin.
Upstater85 on May 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM
The only reason stuff like this would be a “scandal” is because of how the LEFT would react in a situation. Briston Palin wasn’t a huge issue on the right as much as it was tool for the left to bash the right. It’s a glaring hypocrisy. It’s no big issue with the left unless you are somehow tied to the right.
Unless this is all just basically complaining because they can’t just abort without consequences, which just seems childish.
Ampersand on May 8, 2009 at 8:56 AM
How come Ms. McCain’s ‘honesty’ never seems to spotlight on the democraps?
eaglewingz08 on May 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Like most liberals, Meghan is obnoxiously arrogant and believes that the only reason one would disagree with her is ignorance. Smart people would be “worldly” and liberal just like her!
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Meghan’s found her shtick, and she’s shticking with it.
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 9:21 AM
God bless you and your child.
Kensington on May 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM
rhinos like Meghan McCain is the REASON the GOP is falling apart. When a party leaves its BASE the whole party FALLS!!!
JihadKiller1s1k on May 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM
AWESOME!! If being a GOOD Republican means a wife AND a girlfriend then color me Republican forever!
Oh yeah and I think my wife is switching to democrat and calling a lawyer or something……..Some people just have no party loyalty!
Redglen on May 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Wouldn’t this be a good argument for not having pre-marital sex?
PappaMac on May 8, 2009 at 10:32 AM
So Meg-Mac is friends with Cheney’s daughter?
Maybe the best way to prepare our “kids” (daughters) for that is to inform them of the dangers, so they have the strength to say “no” until they are ready to assume motherhood.
Rather than Meg-Mac who dabbles in politics with her father’s name, tries to be “sexy” and has no idea what she’s talking about, a better advocate for sex education is Bristol Palin, who has been scandalized by her ex-boyfriend and the media eager to heap shame on her mother. Bristol Palin has the courage to admit that she made a big mistake and has learned her lesson, and is telling adolescent girls “DON’T do what I did–see how much trouble it gave me and my Mom!” Bristol Palin can connect with girls far better then Meg-Mac, because Palin knows the consequences of a bad decision.
Suggestion for AllahPundit: Why don’t you do conservatives a favor and marry Meg-Mac and live happily ever after, and leave the political blogging to Ed Morrissey?
Steve Z on May 8, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Our boy asked her what she was wearing to the WH Press Correspondent’s Dinner. He needed to know so he could advise her as to a hair accessory, which he refers to as a “headdress.” Ever since he saw that stupid headband she wore on Larry King, he’s been obsessed with it. If only he knew how much that crap cost.
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Maybe, Allahpundit could shtick it to her and give us a break.
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM
That would be hilarious. They would drop her immediately and then she would have to, gasp, get a job.
Blake on May 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Why is the head of Moomoo McTwinkie on this thread?
BillaryMcBush on May 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM
Ah, the gentle remonstrations of the self-righteous…
I particularly like the part where she asserts that Republicans won’t “talk openly” about problems like teen sex, teen pregnancy, and alternative family structures that other people “deal with rationally.”
I don’t know a single soul who has the least bit of difficulty talking about these issues. We just insist on civilized behavior; and for some reason, whoever it is that uttered the nonsense at the top of this thread thinks civilized behavior is “irrational.”
This is the mealy-mouthed dissembling they use because they want to disguise the fact — and fact, it is — that they genuinely approve of all those irresponsible acts they pretend to oppose.
philwynk on May 8, 2009 at 1:46 PM
This is awesome.
Mommypundit on May 8, 2009 at 1:55 PM
I try not to laugh at name calling but I got 2 give you credit for being creative in your insults. That is funny.
terryannonline on May 8, 2009 at 6:47 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2