<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamateurism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Democrats &#187; Obama Proposed $18 Billion In Cuts&#8211; Seeks $81 Billion For His Agenda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2191316</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Democrats &#187; Obama Proposed $18 Billion In Cuts&#8211; Seeks $81 Billion For His Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 23:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2191316</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey at HotAir breaks down the numbers: Apparently, we were all wrong. 99.5% of the federal budget is meat, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey at HotAir breaks down the numbers: Apparently, we were all wrong. 99.5% of the federal budget is meat, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2186729</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2186729</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Ed, you missed the real lede — but then, it’s buried in a different AP article:

Paul_in_NJ on May 7, 2009 at 3:40 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Son of a… Well, that’s gone down the memory hole; the article has been edited — the parts I quoted above are gone.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, but the article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ksbw.com/money/19387217/detail.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lives on elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Ed, you missed the real lede — but then, it’s buried in a different AP article:</p>
<p>Paul_in_NJ on May 7, 2009 at 3:40 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Son of a… Well, that’s gone down the memory hole; the article has been edited — the parts I quoted above are gone.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, but the article <a href="http://www.ksbw.com/money/19387217/detail.html" rel="nofollow">lives on elsewhere</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2186725</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2186725</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ed, you missed the real lede — but then, it’s buried in a different AP article:

Paul_in_NJ on May 7, 2009 at 3:40 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Son of a... Well, that&#039;s gone down the memory hole; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090507/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article has been edited&lt;/a&gt; -- the parts I quoted above are gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ed, you missed the real lede — but then, it’s buried in a different AP article:</p>
<p>Paul_in_NJ on May 7, 2009 at 3:40 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Son of a&#8230; Well, that&#8217;s gone down the memory hole; the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090507/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget" rel="nofollow">article has been edited</a> &#8212; the parts I quoted above are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Danet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2186385</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Danet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2186385</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama continues to disagree with current administration on size of budget cuts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama continues to disagree with current administration on size of budget cuts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Save the GOP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Budget Cuts! We&#8217;ve Got Budget Cuts!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2185733</link>
		<dc:creator>Save the GOP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Budget Cuts! We&#8217;ve Got Budget Cuts!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2185733</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey provides some excellent number-crunching to put Obama&#8217;s &#8220;cuts&#8221; in perspective: Just to remind everyone, $17 billion comprises just 4.25% of the increase in the federal budget under Obama.  It amounts to somewhere around 2.2% of Porkulus.  Obama just signed an omnibus spending bill that cost $410 billion, against which the cuts are about 4.25% as well.  The pork-barrel line items in the omnibus spending plan alone amounted to almost half of what Obama just cut ($7.7 billion).  And just to emphasize the point, the $17 billion amounts to 0.85% of 2009’s deficit, and only 1.7% of the lowest deficit projected by the Obama administration in any of the next ten years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey provides some excellent number-crunching to put Obama&#8217;s &#8220;cuts&#8221; in perspective: Just to remind everyone, $17 billion comprises just 4.25% of the increase in the federal budget under Obama.  It amounts to somewhere around 2.2% of Porkulus.  Obama just signed an omnibus spending bill that cost $410 billion, against which the cuts are about 4.25% as well.  The pork-barrel line items in the omnibus spending plan alone amounted to almost half of what Obama just cut ($7.7 billion).  And just to emphasize the point, the $17 billion amounts to 0.85% of 2009’s deficit, and only 1.7% of the lowest deficit projected by the Obama administration in any of the next ten years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZfederalist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2185400</link>
		<dc:creator>AZfederalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2185400</guid>
		<description>True to form, 1/2 the cuts from the Defense budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True to form, 1/2 the cuts from the Defense budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Massively Cuts Budget&#8230;By 0.5% &#124; NEOAVATARA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2185010</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Massively Cuts Budget&#8230;By 0.5% &#124; NEOAVATARA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2185010</guid>
		<description>[...] is how ludicrous $17 billion is in the scheme of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is how ludicrous $17 billion is in the scheme of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attention K-Mart shoppers! Obama &#8217;slashes&#8217; the budget by $17 billion or 0.5%! But for what programs? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184704</link>
		<dc:creator>Attention K-Mart shoppers! Obama &#8217;slashes&#8217; the budget by $17 billion or 0.5%! But for what programs? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184704</guid>
		<description>[...] look an actual, meaningful cut in the 2010 budget that is “slashed” by a whopping $17 billion, which includes a cut of $4,000,000 (9%) in the Labor Department’s Office of Labor-Management Standards from $45,000,000 to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] look an actual, meaningful cut in the 2010 budget that is “slashed” by a whopping $17 billion, which includes a cut of $4,000,000 (9%) in the Labor Department’s Office of Labor-Management Standards from $45,000,000 to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightly Ramble:The Railroaded Edition &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184650</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightly Ramble:The Railroaded Edition &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184650</guid>
		<description>[...] Mirrors and your dollars: So, the press is claiming Obama &#8216;trimmed the budget&#8217;?   Ed Morrissey points out that while he trimmed 0.05%, he&#8217;s boosted spending by 12%&#8230; and I&#8217;d add that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mirrors and your dollars: So, the press is claiming Obama &#8216;trimmed the budget&#8217;?   Ed Morrissey points out that while he trimmed 0.05%, he&#8217;s boosted spending by 12%&#8230; and I&#8217;d add that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stupid: $17 billion is a lot of money outside D.C., says Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184631</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stupid: $17 billion is a lot of money outside D.C., says Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184631</guid>
		<description>[...] crunched the numbers on Obama&#8217;s ridiculous budget cuts this morning but I thought you&#8217;d enjoy video of The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crunched the numbers on Obama&#8217;s ridiculous budget cuts this morning but I thought you&#8217;d enjoy video of The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184584</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184584</guid>
		<description>Ed, you missed the real lede -- but then, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090507/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it&#039;s buried in a different AP article&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Those [$17 billion a year] savings are far exceeded by a 2 1/2-inch thick volume detailing Obama&#039;s generous increases for domestic programs. And &lt;strong&gt;instead of devoting the savings to defray record deficits, the White House is funneling them back into other programs.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I believe that&#039;s called the &quot;Beltway shuffle.&quot; And read on; some of the &quot;savings&quot; are entirely illusory:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama is also claiming savings from eliminating a host of accounts typically earmarked by members of Congress such as a $10 million West Virginia highway project obtained by Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and $15 million obtained by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., for diesel emissions reduction grants.

Obama is also proposing $145 million in savings from a clean water program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency which bankrolled 301 earmarks this year.

But &lt;strong&gt;Obama is not actually proposing to kill thousands of earmarks&lt;/strong&gt; funded in the $410 billion catchall spending bill passed in March.

In fact, some of the cuts, like terminating production of C-17 cargo aircraft and phasing out direct payments to farmers with sales exceeding $500,000 annually, &lt;strong&gt;have already been rejected&lt;/strong&gt; by Obama&#039;s allies in Congress.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, you missed the real lede &#8212; but then, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090507/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget" rel="nofollow">it&#8217;s buried in a different AP article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those [$17 billion a year] savings are far exceeded by a 2 1/2-inch thick volume detailing Obama&#8217;s generous increases for domestic programs. And <strong>instead of devoting the savings to defray record deficits, the White House is funneling them back into other programs.</strong>
</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe that&#8217;s called the &#8220;Beltway shuffle.&#8221; And read on; some of the &#8220;savings&#8221; are entirely illusory:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama is also claiming savings from eliminating a host of accounts typically earmarked by members of Congress such as a $10 million West Virginia highway project obtained by Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and $15 million obtained by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., for diesel emissions reduction grants.</p>
<p>Obama is also proposing $145 million in savings from a clean water program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency which bankrolled 301 earmarks this year.</p>
<p>But <strong>Obama is not actually proposing to kill thousands of earmarks</strong> funded in the $410 billion catchall spending bill passed in March.</p>
<p>In fact, some of the cuts, like terminating production of C-17 cargo aircraft and phasing out direct payments to farmers with sales exceeding $500,000 annually, <strong>have already been rejected</strong> by Obama&#8217;s allies in Congress.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schadenfreude</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184121</link>
		<dc:creator>Schadenfreude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184121</guid>
		<description>Ed, you assume our children is learning math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, you assume our children is learning math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184096</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184096</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you eat it slow, that handful of rice can sustain you all day!

capejasmine on May 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Something Gulag prisoners learned a long time ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you eat it slow, that handful of rice can sustain you all day!</p>
<p>capejasmine on May 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Something Gulag prisoners learned a long time ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184092</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184092</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;maverick muse on May 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
As an amateur genealogist, I find the census a gold mine for info, but the info has to be taken with a grain of salt bcs people LIE about things.
So if they do want accurate demographic info, you are 100% correct they should comb public records databases.
This would be a more efficient use of the $$ going to the census.
The census worker that came to our driveway just asked us if we lived there &amp; if this was our address &amp; we said yes &amp; they left.
Then I got the huge booklet in the mail to fill out myself.
Tell me why they had to pay somebody to drive way out in the country to my house?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>maverick muse on May 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>As an amateur genealogist, I find the census a gold mine for info, but the info has to be taken with a grain of salt bcs people LIE about things.<br />
So if they do want accurate demographic info, you are 100% correct they should comb public records databases.<br />
This would be a more efficient use of the $$ going to the census.<br />
The census worker that came to our driveway just asked us if we lived there &amp; if this was our address &amp; we said yes &amp; they left.<br />
Then I got the huge booklet in the mail to fill out myself.<br />
Tell me why they had to pay somebody to drive way out in the country to my house?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184083</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184083</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The above was one of Obama’s promises recorded by Jake Tapper. Hmmmm…$15 billion a year for 5 million jobs comes out to $3,000 per year per job, or about $1.44 per hour. Doesn’t that violate minimum wage laws? Or does he plan to hire illegal aliens?

Steve Z on May 7, 2009 at 10:41 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Nah. The immigrants will get the high paying union jobs. Those $1.44 jobs will go to us. Don&#039;t worry though. I&#039;m sure meals are included. If you eat it slow, that handful of rice can sustain you all day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The above was one of Obama’s promises recorded by Jake Tapper. Hmmmm…$15 billion a year for 5 million jobs comes out to $3,000 per year per job, or about $1.44 per hour. Doesn’t that violate minimum wage laws? Or does he plan to hire illegal aliens?</p>
<p>Steve Z on May 7, 2009 at 10:41 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Nah. The immigrants will get the high paying union jobs. Those $1.44 jobs will go to us. Don&#8217;t worry though. I&#8217;m sure meals are included. If you eat it slow, that handful of rice can sustain you all day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldleprechaun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184079</link>
		<dc:creator>oldleprechaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184079</guid>
		<description>What don&#039;t you people understand about &quot;anointed&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What don&#8217;t you people understand about &#8220;anointed&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallard T. Drake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184078</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallard T. Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184078</guid>
		<description>Obama brings pinking shears to a rendering</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama brings pinking shears to a rendering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184075</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184075</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Precedent continues to undermine the safety of our military, my son included. Damn.

Shout out to hawkdriver! Stay safe.

ladyingray on May 7, 2009 at 9:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Prayers for your son, and for hawkdriver. :)

It angers me to no end, that they cut defense spending, in a time of war. And this is supposed to be our smartest president ever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Precedent continues to undermine the safety of our military, my son included. Damn.</p>
<p>Shout out to hawkdriver! Stay safe.</p>
<p>ladyingray on May 7, 2009 at 9:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Prayers for your son, and for hawkdriver. :)</p>
<p>It angers me to no end, that they cut defense spending, in a time of war. And this is supposed to be our smartest president ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2184038</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2184038</guid>
		<description>I can hardly wait to see all the &#039;cuts&#039;.  After all, this is the same administration that screwed investors (aka SPECULATORS) out of $500 MILLION in the Chrysler fiasco.  And the same administration that tried to screw military reservists by having them foot their own medical bills for injuries sustained while on active duty just to save $650 MILLION.

Given that past is prologue, I wonder who else these petty assholes are planning on screwing while ignoring 8,000+ earmarks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hardly wait to see all the &#8216;cuts&#8217;.  After all, this is the same administration that screwed investors (aka SPECULATORS) out of $500 MILLION in the Chrysler fiasco.  And the same administration that tried to screw military reservists by having them foot their own medical bills for injuries sustained while on active duty just to save $650 MILLION.</p>
<p>Given that past is prologue, I wonder who else these petty assholes are planning on screwing while ignoring 8,000+ earmarks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MagicalPat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183967</link>
		<dc:creator>MagicalPat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183967</guid>
		<description>As I recall, during the debates McCain wanted to cut pork and Obama said it only amounted to about $17 billion of the Federal budget, and therefore was inconsequential. He claimed his &#039;line by line&#039; program would be better.

Funny how it comes out to that same inconsequential $17 billion.

Only now, I guess it&#039;s a big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, during the debates McCain wanted to cut pork and Obama said it only amounted to about $17 billion of the Federal budget, and therefore was inconsequential. He claimed his &#8216;line by line&#8217; program would be better.</p>
<p>Funny how it comes out to that same inconsequential $17 billion.</p>
<p>Only now, I guess it&#8217;s a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183929</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183929</guid>
		<description>Take a little stroll around the USAJOBS website sometime and see how many of those jobs you think are really critical to the functioning of America.  The fat in this government is unbelievable and disgraceful.  I know people in corporate America who are doing jobs that 10 or more people used to do - that is what SHOULD be happening in the government.  I almost would not are about the dollar amount, if the Precedent would simply say he is ordering a 5 percent across the board cut in the federal workforce and freezing new hires I might start taking him seriously.

Ronald Reagan&#039;s first act as President in 1981 was ordering a federal hiring freeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a little stroll around the USAJOBS website sometime and see how many of those jobs you think are really critical to the functioning of America.  The fat in this government is unbelievable and disgraceful.  I know people in corporate America who are doing jobs that 10 or more people used to do &#8211; that is what SHOULD be happening in the government.  I almost would not are about the dollar amount, if the Precedent would simply say he is ordering a 5 percent across the board cut in the federal workforce and freezing new hires I might start taking him seriously.</p>
<p>Ronald Reagan&#8217;s first act as President in 1981 was ordering a federal hiring freeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama wants to cut one-half of 1 percent of the $3.4 trillion budget &#171; Jim Blazsik</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183886</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama wants to cut one-half of 1 percent of the $3.4 trillion budget &#171; Jim Blazsik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183886</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey shares: That’s it. Apparently, we were all wrong. 99.5% of the federal budget is meat, and Obama found all the fat in that $17 billion. Just to remind everyone, $17 billion comprises just 4.25% of the increase in the federal budget under Obama. It amounts to somewhere around 2.2% of Porkulus. Obama just signed an omnibus spending bill that cost $410 billion, against which the cuts are about 4.25% as well. The pork-barrel line items in the omnibus spending plan alone amounted to almost half of what Obama just cut ($7.7 billion). And just to emphasize the point, the $17 billion amounts to 0.85% of 2009’s deficit, and only 1.7% of the lowest deficit projected by the Obama administration in any of the next ten years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey shares: That’s it. Apparently, we were all wrong. 99.5% of the federal budget is meat, and Obama found all the fat in that $17 billion. Just to remind everyone, $17 billion comprises just 4.25% of the increase in the federal budget under Obama. It amounts to somewhere around 2.2% of Porkulus. Obama just signed an omnibus spending bill that cost $410 billion, against which the cuts are about 4.25% as well. The pork-barrel line items in the omnibus spending plan alone amounted to almost half of what Obama just cut ($7.7 billion). And just to emphasize the point, the $17 billion amounts to 0.85% of 2009’s deficit, and only 1.7% of the lowest deficit projected by the Obama administration in any of the next ten years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183855</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183855</guid>
		<description>How about cutting the car, and gasoline usage from the budget? The rest of us have to pay for our own gas, to , and from work, and to any other activities, or chores we might have to do. No one pays for that, but us. So why are we paying for such a luxury for others, who don&#039;t seem to be performing well in their duties, at all?

How about we quit spending tax payer money on frivolous nonsense. Especially since a majority is unhappy with this kind of waste?

How about downsizing government, getting cabinet members to pay their late taxes, with interest, and penalties?

How about we limit trips, and flights, with Air Force One, to maybe...1 every few months?

And I&#039;m an amateur. If I were in charge of the cutting, that would just be the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about cutting the car, and gasoline usage from the budget? The rest of us have to pay for our own gas, to , and from work, and to any other activities, or chores we might have to do. No one pays for that, but us. So why are we paying for such a luxury for others, who don&#8217;t seem to be performing well in their duties, at all?</p>
<p>How about we quit spending tax payer money on frivolous nonsense. Especially since a majority is unhappy with this kind of waste?</p>
<p>How about downsizing government, getting cabinet members to pay their late taxes, with interest, and penalties?</p>
<p>How about we limit trips, and flights, with Air Force One, to maybe&#8230;1 every few months?</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m an amateur. If I were in charge of the cutting, that would just be the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjohn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183792</link>
		<dc:creator>drjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183792</guid>
		<description>He knows that all he has to do is say something and his worshippers automatically believe it is fact. They are not about to allow reality to seep into their heads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He knows that all he has to do is say something and his worshippers automatically believe it is fact. They are not about to allow reality to seep into their heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txag92</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/07/obamateurism-of-the-day-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2183761</link>
		<dc:creator>txag92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52352#comment-2183761</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm, Obama likes white meat….

Over Michelle&#039;s dead body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, Obama likes white meat….</p>
<p>Over Michelle&#8217;s dead body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
