Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: Campaign to destroy Miss California escalates; Update: NOM stands by Prejean

posted at 4:10 pm on May 5, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

If you haven’t seen the “scandalous” new photo yet, feast your eyes. It’s been many moons since I’ve looked at the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue but I remember shots like that being in there even when I was a kid. (Or even sometimes on the cover.) Which is to say, it’s very late in the day culturally to be feigning shock at material like this — and yet NBC, the network that aired photos and video of the Virginia Tech killer glorifying himself, has decided that the pic’s simply too hot for the Peacock to handle. A cynic might wonder if they want viewers to imagine that it’s worse than it is. Good thing I’m not a cynic.

There’s an open question of when the photo was taken — she says it was several years ago, others say it’s more recent — which may be relevant to whether she was a Christian or a pageant contender at the time but doesn’t much matter to her critics. Their goal, using the pretext of “hypocrisy,” is simply to try to make her radioactive within her own political and religious communities by painting her as some sort of fallen woman. It didn’t work with Palin vis-a-vis Bristol’s pregnancy and it won’t work here, but presumably they’re drawing some gratification from the mere thought that they might be causing her discomfort. Pure vindictiveness, but then what did you expect?

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Update: Maggie Gallagher from the National Organization of Marriage issues this statement. I told you it wouldn’t work.

Because Carrie honestly said what she believed in answer to a question–marriage is the union of a man and a woman– she is now the subject of ongoing character assassination. The level of hatred directed at her is astonishing. Even more astonishing is her personal courage and strength of character in the midst of these attacks. Of course Carrie is not perfect. On a personal note, as a former unwed mother, I want to say to Americans: you don’t have to be a perfect person to have the right to stand up for marriage. Nothing gay marriage advocates can do can change the fact—we all saw it on national TV—that Carrie is a young woman who surrendered all the glitter Hollywood has to offer, because she would not become the kind of person afraid to say the truth.

Through Carrie, we are also learning, the lengths some people will go to hurt and harass those who speak up for marriage.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 10

That’s hawt.

El_Terrible on May 5, 2009 at 4:11 PM

Maybe we could send Tanya Harding to have a “conversation” with the folks at NBC. Give them an attitude tune up as they head for their limos…. :)

AW1 Tim on May 5, 2009 at 4:12 PM

When do the Janine Garafalo nude photo get released to try and destroy her….sorry I couldn’t finish I just threw up.

portlandon on May 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM

pretty pathetic for nbc to run that. It wont hurt her she will be fine. The national organization of marriage is still strongly supporting her.

ousoonerfan15 on May 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Liberal hags only WISH they had that body for ONE HOUR – liberalism = envy

Ris4victory on May 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Yawn.

The Ugly American on May 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Maybe she just has a wide stance.

benny shakar on May 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Is this supposed to make me hate her? She’s right on marriage, and she’s a hyper-hottie. She’s got everything!

Pope Linus on May 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Under the new hate crimes law, pedophiles are protected. That means if a child molestor does your child, your punishment for beating him up will double. What has this pretty lady done wrong? why are the evil people so hatefull?

seven on May 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM

So are they real, or are they bolt-ons?

pseudonominus on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Big deal. How about Perez Hilton topless in panties…BARF!

RobCon on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Wow! I’d guess that photo would raise her cred by about 7000%. Hilton must be seething that no one wants to see his butt in the news.

MikeA on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

LOL. Remember when the left found pictures of Sarah Palin in a bikini during the beauty pageant? They eagerly screamed, “this will surely scare those conservatives away!”

El_Terrible on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

The hypocrisy! Didn’t you guys read the controversial underwear verse in Leviticus?

patriette on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

It’s been many moons since I’ve looked at the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue but I remember shots like that being in there even when I was a kid. (Or even sometimes on the cover.) Which is to say, it’s very late in the day culturally to be feigning shock at material like this — and yet NBC, the network that aired photos and video of the Virginia Tech killer glorifying himself, has decided that the pic’s simply too hot for the Peacock to handle.

This type of photo is pretty standard stuff in women’s lingerie catalogues, too.

NBC much have much higher standards than USA where even now they are playing a Monk episode which showed partial rear nudity on a man. Oh, the horror, the horror!

Y-not on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

What Boobs!!

…er, I meant the NBC execs who decided to not run the pictures.

DrAllecon on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

jaw hits floor…

Hendo on May 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM

So Robert Mapplethorpe’s picture of a finger shoved in the urethral opening of a penis is art, but Miss California in a picture where she is not dressed like a nun complete with halo is sinful?

Not sure I get it

LincolntheHun on May 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM

ALINSKY RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

faraway on May 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Liberal hags only WISH they had that body for ONE HOUR – liberalism = envy

Ris4victory on May 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM

I wish I had that body for one hour. Although if Sportscentre is coming on in 8 minutes, I can make that work too.

landshark on May 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM

This is pretty run of the mill stuff now in SI, Maxim, etc. In escalating this, I think that it will only help her since the demonetization makes her all the more sympathetic. Geez, even the teenagers are doing this with there cell phones…Hey McCain, is she still a stealth proponent of gay marriage? Not being rhetorical or snarky, just seeking your thoughts.

esperpento on May 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM

If you haven’t seen the “scandalous” new photo yet, feast your eyes. It’s been many moons since I’ve looked at the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue but I remember shots like that being in there even when I was a kid. (Or even sometimes on the cover.) Which is to say, it’s very late in the day culturally to be feigning shock at material like this — and yet NBC, the network that aired photos and video of the Virginia Tech killer glorifying himself, has decided that the pic’s simply too hot for the Peacock to handle. A cynic might wonder if they want viewers to imagine that it’s worse than it is. Good thing I’m not a cynic.

And the GOP is the socially conservative party? It would seem the left would like to ban skin.

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM

And the liberal brown shirts march on.

sonofdy on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

liberalism = envy + hate

All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. She still has the right conviction about defending traditional Marriage.

kirkill on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

She is a phony anyway. A real christian will never get breast implants. She would be happy with what God gave her.

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Big deal. How about Perez Hilton topless in panties…BARF!

RobCon on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Double Upchuck!

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

i love how nbc calls it “topless”. it what universe would that photo fit the definition of “topless” per an obscenity censor??!?

battleoflepanto1571 on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Big Deal…

LOL when did liberal say that “clothing optional” was a problem in an sense of form? It isn’t like she was in the Gay Pride parades with chaps on and no panties. OPPS, I guess that is the kettle calling the pot… something.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Yep, this is Alinsky tactics at their best… tried it w/ Palin, did not work and is backfiring. Same thing here…

Will these SOBs ever learn these tactics will only make her more popular and her case stronger?

davek70 on May 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Hey! MSNBC, and NBC show their boobs every day on their news shows….so what’s their beef with that pic, other than they love to play the Christian righteous, when it suits them?

capejasmine on May 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Zoiks! Heavenly?

ronsfi on May 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Big deal. How about Perez Hilton topless in panties…BARF!

RobCon on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

DUDE! I am EATING!

that salad did look good, now it is just tossed.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM

She is a phony anyway. A real christian will never get breast implants. She would be happy with what God gave her.

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

And now you would like to define a real Christian, eh?

Are gays real Christians?

Are criminals real Christians?

Are alcoholics real Christians?

Get back to us when you figure out your evolving definition of a “real Christian.”

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Soooo, they’re trying to discredit a beauty pageant contestant by showing some quite spectacular T&A shots? Brilliant strategy.

Cuffy Meigs on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Under the new hate crimes law, pedophiles are protected. That means if a child molestor does your child, your punishment for beating him up will double.

seven on May 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM
——–
Most off topic comment of all time.

Dave Rywall on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

i also like how supposedly christians can’t model and/or be ’sexy’. nbc really sees us as amish, after all. and anything other than that is “hypocrisy”

once again, i repeat rudy’s call at the gop convention

“WHERE ARE THE FEMINISTS? WHY AREN’T THEY DEFENDING?”

battleoflepanto1571 on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Those Boobs at NBC must not get to the beach much.

I’ve seen *much* racier outfits at the beach.

CrazyFool on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Stop worshiping Palin. The only thing I like about her is that she’s a good person. But she’s a poor politician and isn’t libertarian enough to not repeat the same mistakes George W. Bush made. I wouldn’t vote for her, despite the fact that she’s a good role model for women and pro-lifers.

If Mark Sanford isn’t on the ticket, expect the GOP to lose again in 2012. Sanford is the only guy who can bring libertarians back into the GOP.

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

if that is the worst they can produce (which obviously it is) this wont hurt her at all

ousoonerfan15 on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Scandal smandel! SHE IS A HOTTIE!!

faol on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

When the brains on the left want to argue war or policy issues, fine. But the daily spin at change-the-topic is clearly designed to keep everyone buzzing, keep Obama busy while he’s sticking his greasy hands in the cookie jar. The man is a constitutional rapist and a danger to children not yet born.

Miss California looks fine, a very typical pose for a model or beauty pageant winner. Getting SICK of the dirty socialist progressives and their G.D. tactics.

Vermont Neighbor on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

So I kind of fail to see how that is any more scandalous than the photo of her in the swimsuit competition.

Count to 10 on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

That is one sexy, gorgeous, incredibly beautiful girl.

JEEZE

f*ck!!

blatantblue on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Big Deal…

LOL when did liberal say that “clothing optional” was a problem in an sense of form? It isn’t like she was in the Gay Pride parades with chaps on and no panties. OPPS, I guess that is the kettle calling the pot… something.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Uh… nothing to add. You nailed it.

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

ABC, CBS and CNN have this on their Front Page

faraway on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

is the Victoria’s Secret catalog ever described as containing “nude women”?

And who was that douchebag 1:50 in?

Guess what, moron? I am behind here more than ever.

drjohn on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

says someone with a youtube as a link on their name.

Wow, how original.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

I can only forgive her if she releases all the pictures.Bring em on!..

the_nile on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Soooo, they’re trying to discredit a beauty pageant contestant by showing some quite spectacular T&A shots? Brilliant strategy.

Cuffy Meigs on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

When are they going to ban Vanessa Williams from showing up on NBC?

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Did the MSM ever spend this much time on Obama’s cocaine use?

drjohn on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

“nude”, says Lauer?

Nude includes wearing your underpants now? Someone changed the definition, or NBC is lying again?

“Racy”. Have these people looked at a magazine during the past four decades or so–or is NBC……not lying here but deliberately distorting what little truth there is?

I’m stunned and shocked that NBC would………

never mind

Janos Hunyadi on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

I’m sure it’s somewhere around getting f#cked in the a$$

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

The media are a bunch of haters.
MSNBC seems to have a hard0n for Miss California.
Get in line Olby, Maddow, ect,ect.

RobCon on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Big deal. How about Perez Hilton topless in panties…BARF!

RobCon on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

DUDE! I am EATING!

that salad did look good, now it is just tossed.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM

ROFLMAO!!!!!

capejasmine on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

All this as a result of her non-PC answer to a loaded question asked her by a gay judge at a beauty contest. Wonder why Trump hasn’t spoken up on this. He likes to present himself as a ballsy guy on tough issues, but it appears he gets fainting spells as easily as NBC.

a capella on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Are becoming a shiddyliddle nation of puerile adolescent brats? That development we can hardly survive for there are hard, brutal adults who are out to do us in.

ronsfi on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Wasn’t it NBC who showed that one old wrinkly guy’s bare ass on the old NYPD Blue? Can’t remember his name but he was the guy with the moustache.

Big John on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Liberals are angry that she possesses something their women don’t: Deodorant.

amerpundit on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

It’s been many moons since I’ve looked at the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue but I remember shots like that being in there even when I was a kid

Sure, sure.

Anyway, whats wrong with being sexy?

Does the Bible say you can’t be really good looking and take a swimsuit style of yourself?

blatantblue on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

She’s getting more perfect by the day.

I assure all that firefighters worldwide agree!

FireBlogger on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Niice…a bleach blonde topless pageant queen with silicon breastses is the role model for your little grrls?
All she needs is a pole.
lol

strangelet on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

THAT’S IT???? That’s the scandalous photo???

Yikes. It’s really nice, but scandalous? Hardly.

At least that’s what I think, but I better check the photo a few more times just to make sure.

Daggett on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

We have Carrie.

They have Rosie.

Bring it on.

faraway on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

upinak,

you remind me of an obama supporter, GOP-style

palin could never do any wrong in your eyes

stop worshiping politicians

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

strangelet on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

peanut butter and a dog comes to mind for your snapshot.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

She is a phony anyway. A real christian will never get breast implants. She would be happy with what God gave her.

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Thanks for the daily blast of liberal narrow minded bigotry, ignorance and hate.

nice343 you have no idea what christianity is about. Perhaps before you open your ignorant mouth you would like to find out?

sonofdy on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

When we get some actual nude photos I’ll simultaneously work myself into a lather of outrage and excitement.

BadgerHawk on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

strangelet on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Are you ugly?

Hey, why don’t you link a photo for all of us to see!

blatantblue on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Liberals apparently feel threatened by beautiful women.

evensteven on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

I can’t say that the photo hurts her popularity with uh me. (Though I’m even more certain that she didn’t need no stinkin implants.)

CK MacLeod on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Wasn’t it NBC who showed that one old wrinkly guy’s bare ass on the old NYPD Blue? Can’t remember his name but he was the guy with the moustache.

Big John on May 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM

On further review, that was ABC.

Big John on May 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM

She is a beautiful woman who stood up for her beliefs. That is why the Liberals hate her. They can’t stand it.

kingsjester on May 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

I’d look for it but I’m too busy looking for the bible passage that tells us to wear pants.

landshark on May 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM

All this as a result of her non-PC answer to a loaded question asked her by a gay judge at a beauty contest. Wonder why Trump hasn’t spoken up on this. He likes to present himself as a ballsy guy on tough issues, but it appears he gets fainting spells as easily as NBC.

a capella on May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Trump was on Hannity, I think one evening, and answered to this. It wasn’t satisfactory though. He said, she wasn’t close to winning. I say…then why was she first runner up? He said many people want to judge these contests, so did Perez, and that’s why he was a judge.

He didn’t defend this girl one iota, in my opinion, and seemed to agree with how it was playing out. I’ve never disliked Trump so much, as to this.

As for feminists. No way. They attack her just like all the other liberals, because she doesn’t tow the line on gay marriage. They are psuedo feminists!

capejasmine on May 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM

ABC, CBS and CNN have this on their Front Page

faraway on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Google News search:

Miss California nude pictures: 531 articles

Air Force One New York City classified pictures: 25 articles

Loxodonta on May 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM

Here is the reason Democrats (liberals) hate Ms. California, Sarah Palin, etc:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-repvsdemwomen.htm

Daggett on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

upinak,

you remind me of an obama supporter, GOP-style

palin could never do any wrong in your eyes

stop worshiping politicians

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

He wannabe medschool person.

I and Oink were both the first people to tell Allah about Palin.. 6 months before she got picked. Palin is my Gov. WTF has you freaking wannabe State Government done for you lately except tax you to death and get a federal stimulus check that WAS americans money?

Oh that is right.. NOT A THING!

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

didn’t need no stinkin implants.)

CK MacLeod on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

I know!!!!

Totally unnecessary. Them thangs were great in the first place.

blatantblue on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

When you can’t attack the message you should always resort to attacking the messenger.

thomasaur on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

She didn’t lecture anyone brainiac. Exactly what is she guilty of?

darwin on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

Dude, Jealousy is a bitch.

bluelightbrigade on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

Not appropriate for NBC News to broadcast. If I had the time to waste I think finding a video of similar content airing on NBC in prime time would not be tooooo hard.

rockhead on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

I think she looks great. If they think this will hurt her, they’re crazy.

capitalist piglet on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Prolly just before that same part that says “Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself”… :)

Give it up, friend. You’re only making the hole deeper…

AW1 Tim on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Ahh the godless liberals. Always knowing exactly what Christians should believe and do but having no clue about what their own lives.

GoodBoy on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

This type of photo is pretty standard stuff in women’s lingerie catalogues, too.

NBC much have much higher standards than USA where even now they are playing a Monk episode which showed partial rear nudity on a man. Oh, the horror, the horror!

Y-not on May 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Not to mention the pictures gracing the malls in Abercrombie….

ladyingray on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

peanut butter and a dog comes to mind for your snapshot.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM

You don’t need the dog for strange…

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

She didn’t lecture anyone brainiac. Exactly what is she guilty of?

darwin on May 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM

She is guilty of being a hypocrite.

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

I like her reaction. “I’m a model, and these are modeling shots.” Pretty much all you need to say.

The villification of ordinary people who speak their minds (a la Joe the Plumber) makes me sick. I almost wish it would continue because it’s definitely counter-productive.

grahampowell on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

She shouldn’t be lecturing any body about moral values when she is as guilty as anyone. Which part of the Bible does it say get breast implants

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM

You do realize that a BRA can make someone look pretty good.. and working out keeps them perky… right?

:) I like my breasts… they are just as perky!

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

upinak, I dont wanna brag, but I may have beat you.

faraway on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Stop worshiping Palin. The only thing I like about her is that she’s a good person. But she’s a poor politician and isn’t libertarian enough to not repeat the same mistakes George W. Bush made. I wouldn’t vote for her, despite the fact that she’s a good role model for women and pro-lifers.

If Mark Sanford isn’t on the ticket, expect the GOP to lose again in 2012. Sanford is the only guy who can bring libertarians back into the GOP.

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

I didn’t realize this is another Palin politics thread. Are you lost?

But, since you mentioned him, please wake me up when Sanford stops speaking.

davek70 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Ahh the godless liberals. Always knowing exactly what Christians should believe and do but having no clue about what their own lives.

GoodBoy on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

You’d think they’d be happy… but that would run contrary to Sharia law.

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

She is guilty of being a hypocrite.

nice343 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Jealous.

bluelightbrigade on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

She just got more popular.

regal on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

If Mark Sanford isn’t on the ticket, expect the GOP to lose again in 2012. Sanford is the only guy who can bring libertarians back into the GOP.

MedSchoolCatholic on May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Yawn … more threats. Catholics voted for Obama. Thanks and keep your advice to yourself.

darwin on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

You don’t need the dog for strange…

Upstater85 on May 5, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Right.. just beer and sitting on your hand for that “tingly sensation”.

upinak on May 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Ahh the godless liberals. Always knowing exactly what Christians should believe and do but having no clue about what their own lives.

GoodBoy on May 5, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Strike that extra word..

GoodBoy on May 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 10


You must be logged in to post a comment.