Those of you who have been alert enough to read our political vision, understand that we are taking a flexible approach to the role of government, summarized in this simple Cartesian model:

We’re radical cultural Conservatives who care about family…

The economy would have to be pretty rosey for Obama to demolish Romney.

I didn’t really see Romney take a shot at Palin. Obviously he thinks HE is a more prominent republican than Sarah. What’s wrong with that?

He is not entitled to his opinion?

Borislav on May 5, 2009 at 10:53 PM

If he thinks that, he’s delusional.

Well, then I guess we’re in for an additional four more years of Obama, if the only one they fear is one they’ve already beaten. That sucks.

thecountofincognito on May 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM

We’ll probably be in for four more years in any case. But she hasn’t been beaten any more than Romney has been beaten. If she were beaten, she would be totally off their radar screen now. She isn’t, believe me.

Well, then I guess we’re in for an additional four more years of Obama, if the only one they fear is one they’ve already beaten. That sucks.

He is not entitled to his opinion?

Then this, going through mental gymnastics to try and paint this anti-Democrat comment as a shot at Palin to make Romney look like a jerk.

Who do they REALLY fear?

thecountofincognito on May 5, 2009 at 8:12 PM

Sarah Palin. They feared Romney more than McCain. But the media will be in love with him by 2011. And easy mark, again.

Who wants to bet that Olby piles on the bandwagon given he can’t resist any chance to get in a dig at Sarah? Then again, Olby might be one of those “girlie-men” who would get spooked by viewing the video. Remember how Olby had a hissy fit over the turkey video?

The media are going after Romney in a more insidious way, which instead of rallying the base around him, as their clumsy attacks on Sarah do, drive them away. Anyone notice the comments when the Boston Globe claimed Mitt was now endorsing comprehensive immigration reform? Turns out that was baseless. I didn’t notice any big post about Romney’s response the paper later printed stating it never happened and his position on the issue hasn’t changed at all. Then this, going through mental gymnastics to try and paint this anti-Democrat comment as a shot at Palin to make Romney look like a jerk.

Who do they REALLY fear?

You are partially correct…not ultimately responsible. Ultimately, a person will make his/her own choices.

Still, it is clear beyond a doubt that the percentages of having children do what is right is to have made a good example yourself. Children learn by watching, not by hearing…and kids can pick out a hypocrite very easily.

You get preggers before marriage, the liklihood that your children get preggers before marriags is dramatically increased.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay?

The Wall on May 4, 2009 at 11:35 PM

Children do learn by example, but they can also be taught that choices made by their parents in their youth may not have been the best ones and do their best to avoid those same choices. I know I did…. I was born 6 months after my parents were married – it didn’t scar me nor encourage me to have an “early birth” Our children are also influenced by their friends, media and other outside sources. Children also rebel by doing the exact opposite of their parents teachings. IF (not that it really matters) Sarah Palin was pregnant before marriage, you have absolutely no way of knowing how, when or if it was discussed in their home. You can not make an across the board judgment like that, as per an earlier posting indicating if Bristol had had better morals. That’s pretty judgmental.

You ask what kind of example would Sarah be for our children? You indicate it wouldn’t be a good example. By your analogy, most of the former presidents weren’t good examples either. We’ve had presidents that have had affairs while in office, youthful indiscretions with drugs and alcohol, multiple marriages prior to the WH etc, so NONE of these were good examples? There will never be a perfect person hold the office of President of the United States, no such person exists. Yet there can be and have been effective and strong leaders.

The media are going after Romney? Hardly. He doesn’t pose a threat.

ddrintn on May 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM

That’s not what their polling says. Palin and Romney are the ones they will go after. They went after Romney with a vengeance in the primaries, and during the VP selection process.

The ticket should be Romney and Palin. We need them both.

Once again, the media, and our own party, are going after the one candidate who is best qualified to lead this nation.

Mitt should just tell everyone to *bleep bleep*

eaglesdontflock on May 5, 2009 at 1:38 PM

The media are going after Romney? Hardly. He doesn’t pose a threat.

If I’m not mistaken, Nancy Davis was preggers before she married Ronnie. DISQUALIFIED!!!!!! Mmmmmkaaaaaaaaay?

ddrintn on May 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Thanks for that sample size of uh ONE. You are quite savvy with statistics.

FAIL!

The Wall on May 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM

Huh? A disqualifier for Palin isn’t a disqualifier all around? You’re very savvy with logic.

FAIL!

Mitt should just tell everyone to *bleep bleep*

FAIL!

The Wall on May 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM

Yes you did.

Next.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkaaaaaaaaay???????

If I’m not mistaken, Nancy Davis was preggers before she married Ronnie. DISQUALIFIED!!!!!! Mmmmmkaaaaaaaaay?

ddrintn on May 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM

Thanks for that sample size of uh ONE. You are quite savvy with statistics.

FAIL!

You get preggers before marriage, the liklihood that your children get preggers before marriags is dramatically increased.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay?

The Wall on May 4, 2009 at 11:35 PM

If I’m not mistaken, Nancy Davis was preggers before she married Ronnie. DISQUALIFIED!!!!!! Mmmmmkaaaaaaaaay?

We’d better never let a guy who’s had an affair get into the White House….
/sarc

If you know anything about children growing up, you know the parents can’t always be responsible for their children’s lousy choices. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay?

ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 11:04 PM

You are partially correct…not ultimately responsible. Ultimately, a person will make his/her own choices.

Still, it is clear beyond a doubt that the percentages of having children do what is right is to have made a good example yourself. Children learn by watching, not by hearing…and kids can pick out a hypocrite very easily.

You get preggers before marriage, the liklihood that your children get preggers before marriags is dramatically increased.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay?

That is why Bristol got knocked up.

Mmmmmmmkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay?????

The Wall on May 4, 2009 at 10:30 PM

Can you swear to the absolute sexual purity of any of the Romney clan? Or is it that in the case of the Romneys it isn’t that important? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?

If you know anything about children growing up, the learn by EXAMPLE not by WORDS. So, if a impressionable gal is being told “Hey be abstinent, you betcha *winks*” yet the girl knows the person doing the moralizing was knocked up in the back seat of a Chevy while listening to Free Bird…she doesnt take the moralizer seriously.

If you know anything about children growing up, you know the parents can’t always be responsible for their children’s lousy choices. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay?

If you know anything about children growing up, the learn by EXAMPLE not by WORDS.
The Wall on May 4, 2009 at 10:30 PM

I take it your kids consider anybody who disagrees with them politically to be intellectually deficient?

And spamming repetitious blog posts to be a valuable investment of time?