<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Poll: Majorities oppose gay marriage, pro-choice now just plurality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama and the Gradual Abridgement of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-2/#comment-2175448</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama and the Gradual Abridgement of Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2175448</guid>
		<description>[...] ceremonies and drive-thru abortion clinics in many of us on the Right.  Despite their own polls indicating otherwise, the Left still believes a significant majority of Americans support same sex marriage and abortion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ceremonies and drive-thru abortion clinics in many of us on the Right.  Despite their own polls indicating otherwise, the Left still believes a significant majority of Americans support same sex marriage and abortion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kens</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-2/#comment-2175389</link>
		<dc:creator>kens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2175389</guid>
		<description>I still recall the look on that Perez character&#039;s face when he heard the answer. Like somebody squeezed off something foul into his mess kit and he was frozen in time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still recall the look on that Perez character&#8217;s face when he heard the answer. Like somebody squeezed off something foul into his mess kit and he was frozen in time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philwynk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-2/#comment-2174574</link>
		<dc:creator>philwynk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2174574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
When it comes to being Pro-Life I wonder how many are like myself in that they’re against abortion as a means of birth control but accept it for cases of rape/incest and absolute danger to mothers health... 

Yakko77 on May 4, 2009 at 6:17 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Last I heard, that question gets a 70% &quot;yes&quot; response even after 35 years of pro-abortion propaganda. 

It all depends on how the question is asked. When asked fairly, those are the boundaries the vast majority of Americans prefer. That&#039;s why you have to ask this question here; that question is hardly ever asked fairly. The dishonest pollsters know what answer they&#039;re going to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
When it comes to being Pro-Life I wonder how many are like myself in that they’re against abortion as a means of birth control but accept it for cases of rape/incest and absolute danger to mothers health&#8230; </p>
<p>Yakko77 on May 4, 2009 at 6:17 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Last I heard, that question gets a 70% &#8220;yes&#8221; response even after 35 years of pro-abortion propaganda. </p>
<p>It all depends on how the question is asked. When asked fairly, those are the boundaries the vast majority of Americans prefer. That&#8217;s why you have to ask this question here; that question is hardly ever asked fairly. The dishonest pollsters know what answer they&#8217;re going to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-2/#comment-2174426</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2174426</guid>
		<description>Since Hotair seems to have Poll fever and it isn&#039;t going to go away soon how about you start suggesting properly worded questions for pollsters.

Here&#039;s the first on &quot;gay marriage&quot;:
&quot;Do you the union of 2 people of the same sex marriage?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Hotair seems to have Poll fever and it isn&#8217;t going to go away soon how about you start suggesting properly worded questions for pollsters.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the first on &#8220;gay marriage&#8221;:<br />
&#8220;Do you the union of 2 people of the same sex marriage?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrSteve</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2174380</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2174380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;strangelet on May 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wonder how many of those kids in the survey you cited understand what overturning &lt;em&gt;Roe&lt;/em&gt; would actually mean.  I&#039;m guessing fewer than 3 in 10 do, and that&#039;s being generous.  In my experience a slightly smaller percentage of adults than that understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>strangelet on May 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder how many of those kids in the survey you cited understand what overturning <em>Roe</em> would actually mean.  I&#8217;m guessing fewer than 3 in 10 do, and that&#8217;s being generous.  In my experience a slightly smaller percentage of adults than that understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeSam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2174368</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2174368</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I ask you, what were the numbers 5, 10, 15 years ago? They were much, MUCH lower. At this rate in 10 years, gay marriage advocates will definitely be in the majority. This issue is slipping out of the GOP’s hands and you can just feel the fear and uncertainty there. They will quickly have to come up with another boogeyman soon lest they want voters to actually look at the GOP platform and decide for themselves.

dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 6:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If so many GOPers didn&#039;t act like Democrats on issues other than abortion and gay marriage, they GOP wouldn&#039;t be demonized by this sh*t.

I&#039;m glad the GOP takes an aspirational view about abortion.

What&#039;s radical about opposing funding for overseas abortions? What&#039;s radical about reasonable restrictions on late-term abortions? The vaunted Roe court was dumb enough to introduce the concept of viability, and medical science has dialed that back towards conception. What&#039;s radical about parental consent or notification for abortions for minors? What&#039;s radical about cutting off funding to Planned Parenthood? It doesn&#039;t have enough money? What&#039;s to demonize here? I don&#039;t see women going to jail for having an abortion, and I don&#039;t see that coming in the future? And, given the state of the law and the composition of the Supreme Court, what are the prospects of ever overturning Roe? And so what if it were overturned? What does that mean? The GOP never clearly explains that it&#039;s an issue left to each of the states--again, if it gets there?

What&#039;s the more admirable stance? Fighting for the right of an unborn child to be born or fighting for the right of a callous skank too stupid to remember her birth control to terminate a child she doesn&#039;t want? Get a vibrator and get out of the political debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I ask you, what were the numbers 5, 10, 15 years ago? They were much, MUCH lower. At this rate in 10 years, gay marriage advocates will definitely be in the majority. This issue is slipping out of the GOP’s hands and you can just feel the fear and uncertainty there. They will quickly have to come up with another boogeyman soon lest they want voters to actually look at the GOP platform and decide for themselves.</p>
<p>dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 6:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>If so many GOPers didn&#8217;t act like Democrats on issues other than abortion and gay marriage, they GOP wouldn&#8217;t be demonized by this sh*t.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the GOP takes an aspirational view about abortion.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s radical about opposing funding for overseas abortions? What&#8217;s radical about reasonable restrictions on late-term abortions? The vaunted Roe court was dumb enough to introduce the concept of viability, and medical science has dialed that back towards conception. What&#8217;s radical about parental consent or notification for abortions for minors? What&#8217;s radical about cutting off funding to Planned Parenthood? It doesn&#8217;t have enough money? What&#8217;s to demonize here? I don&#8217;t see women going to jail for having an abortion, and I don&#8217;t see that coming in the future? And, given the state of the law and the composition of the Supreme Court, what are the prospects of ever overturning Roe? And so what if it were overturned? What does that mean? The GOP never clearly explains that it&#8217;s an issue left to each of the states&#8211;again, if it gets there?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the more admirable stance? Fighting for the right of an unborn child to be born or fighting for the right of a callous skank too stupid to remember her birth control to terminate a child she doesn&#8217;t want? Get a vibrator and get out of the political debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lansing quaker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2174136</link>
		<dc:creator>lansing quaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2174136</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, I don&#039;t find this surprising at all (re: gay marriage).  It&#039;s about 4-5 months between the polling re-visit.  A longitudinal study over decades would be far more eye opening.

More, just look at the language:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you think &lt;strong&gt;marriages between gay and lesbian couples&lt;/strong&gt; should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the &lt;strong&gt;same rights as &lt;em&gt;traditional&lt;/em&gt; marriages&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Emphasis naturally added.

Rephrase this as:

&quot;Do you think &lt;strong&gt;same-sex civil unions&lt;/strong&gt; should or should not be &lt;strong&gt;recognized &lt;em&gt;by the government&lt;/em&gt; as valid&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;em&gt;offering&lt;/em&gt; the same rights as existing, &lt;strong&gt;government-issued marriage &lt;em&gt;licenses&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;?&quot; 

And I think you&#039;ll get a much different response.

It&#039;s all about the &quot;M&quot; word.  I wish the gay rights groups would get that and drop the &quot;marriage&quot; battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, I don&#8217;t find this surprising at all (re: gay marriage).  It&#8217;s about 4-5 months between the polling re-visit.  A longitudinal study over decades would be far more eye opening.</p>
<p>More, just look at the language:</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you think <strong>marriages between gay and lesbian couples</strong> should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the <strong>same rights as <em>traditional</em> marriages</strong>?</p></blockquote>
<p>Emphasis naturally added.</p>
<p>Rephrase this as:</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you think <strong>same-sex civil unions</strong> should or should not be <strong>recognized <em>by the government</em> as valid</strong>, <em>offering</em> the same rights as existing, <strong>government-issued marriage <em>licenses</em></strong>?&#8221; </p>
<p>And I think you&#8217;ll get a much different response.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the &#8220;M&#8221; word.  I wish the gay rights groups would get that and drop the &#8220;marriage&#8221; battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173944</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m for civil unions for gay couples, but not marriage. But the opinions of the 44% might be accounted for in part by the shrillness and insistence of the propaganda they’ve been fed for quite a while now. Of course, that can work both ways and an outcome is never really inevitable.

ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree on civil unions.  Civil unions probably poll a majority nationally.  It is too bad that things are polarized and it looks like a fight over the word &quot;marriage&quot;  rather than a discussion over rights.

As for the future, we&#039;ll see.  Most people are focused on other things in their daily lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m for civil unions for gay couples, but not marriage. But the opinions of the 44% might be accounted for in part by the shrillness and insistence of the propaganda they’ve been fed for quite a while now. Of course, that can work both ways and an outcome is never really inevitable.</p>
<p>ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree on civil unions.  Civil unions probably poll a majority nationally.  It is too bad that things are polarized and it looks like a fight over the word &#8220;marriage&#8221;  rather than a discussion over rights.</p>
<p>As for the future, we&#8217;ll see.  Most people are focused on other things in their daily lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173883</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173883</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The poll had 44% for marriage? That has maybe doubled in the past 20 years. If people are getting more conservative on this issue it hasn’t been at high enough levels to net out the opinions of new voters every year.

dedalus on May 4, 2009 at 10:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;m for civil unions for gay couples, but not marriage. But the opinions of the 44% might be accounted for in part by the shrillness and insistence of the propaganda they&#039;ve been fed for quite a while now. Of course, that can work both ways and an outcome is never really inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The poll had 44% for marriage? That has maybe doubled in the past 20 years. If people are getting more conservative on this issue it hasn’t been at high enough levels to net out the opinions of new voters every year.</p>
<p>dedalus on May 4, 2009 at 10:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m for civil unions for gay couples, but not marriage. But the opinions of the 44% might be accounted for in part by the shrillness and insistence of the propaganda they&#8217;ve been fed for quite a while now. Of course, that can work both ways and an outcome is never really inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cs89</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173858</link>
		<dc:creator>cs89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173858</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Young people simply aren’t opposed to it the way older people are which would indicate that it is only a matter of time.

lexhamfox on May 4, 2009 at 7:29 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because nobody &lt;em&gt;ever&lt;/em&gt; changes their opinion as they age and experience life...
/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Young people simply aren’t opposed to it the way older people are which would indicate that it is only a matter of time.</p>
<p>lexhamfox on May 4, 2009 at 7:29 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Because nobody <em>ever</em> changes their opinion as they age and experience life&#8230;<br />
/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173838</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173838</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There are a lot of famous cliches built around that phenomenon, and like most cliches, there’s a lot lot of truth in them. I certainly became more conservative as I got older, and I’m not the only one. Think about that for awhile.

Dreadnought on May 4, 2009 at 9:42 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The poll had 44% for marriage?  That has maybe doubled in the past 20 years.  If people are getting more conservative on this issue it hasn&#039;t been at high enough levels to net out the opinions of new voters every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There are a lot of famous cliches built around that phenomenon, and like most cliches, there’s a lot lot of truth in them. I certainly became more conservative as I got older, and I’m not the only one. Think about that for awhile.</p>
<p>Dreadnought on May 4, 2009 at 9:42 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The poll had 44% for marriage?  That has maybe doubled in the past 20 years.  If people are getting more conservative on this issue it hasn&#8217;t been at high enough levels to net out the opinions of new voters every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173685</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173685</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It’s not so socially acceptable, is it?

ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM

Well, there is that female Bishop who is taking over at the Harvard Divinity School who preaches that abortion is a gift from God. Her name escapres me at the moment, but there is a leftist kook fringe who view abortion as though it were part of their Holy Trinity.

A Balrog of Morgoth on May 4, 2009 at 8:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, yeah, I guess there are some still around like that. Let&#039;s be thankful there are fewer of them. I believe that if this were the mid-1970s though you&#039;d probably remember her name. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It’s not so socially acceptable, is it?</p>
<p>ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM</p>
<p>Well, there is that female Bishop who is taking over at the Harvard Divinity School who preaches that abortion is a gift from God. Her name escapres me at the moment, but there is a leftist kook fringe who view abortion as though it were part of their Holy Trinity.</p>
<p>A Balrog of Morgoth on May 4, 2009 at 8:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, yeah, I guess there are some still around like that. Let&#8217;s be thankful there are fewer of them. I believe that if this were the mid-1970s though you&#8217;d probably remember her name. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173676</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173676</guid>
		<description>Who will have the audacity to tell Peter Puffer Perez he&#039;s in the minority?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will have the audacity to tell Peter Puffer Perez he&#8217;s in the minority?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreadnought</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173637</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreadnought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173637</guid>
		<description>I anxiously await the next David Frum column built around these poll results. New Majority indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I anxiously await the next David Frum column built around these poll results. New Majority indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreadnought</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173635</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreadnought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173635</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think you’re statistics reasoning is way off. If you look back, support for gay marriage over time has only risen, never fallen back. I assure you, in 10 years time with millions of old folks/baby boomers dead or dying and my generation and younger having more power and influence, the numbers will only get better for equality. You can try to sugarcoat things to rest better at night, but we all know its the truth.

dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 6:56 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What&#039;s the matter? Poll numbers didn&#039;t work out the way you hoped? You sound like the one sugarcoating to me.

Counting chickens before they hatched? This poll demonstrates you don&#039;t even have the eggs. Have you ever considered the fact that people tend to get more conservative as they get older? There are a lot of famous cliches built around that phenomenon, and like most cliches, there&#039;s a lot lot of truth in them. I certainly became more conservative as I got older, and I&#039;m not the only one. Think about that for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think you’re statistics reasoning is way off. If you look back, support for gay marriage over time has only risen, never fallen back. I assure you, in 10 years time with millions of old folks/baby boomers dead or dying and my generation and younger having more power and influence, the numbers will only get better for equality. You can try to sugarcoat things to rest better at night, but we all know its the truth.</p>
<p>dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 6:56 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s the matter? Poll numbers didn&#8217;t work out the way you hoped? You sound like the one sugarcoating to me.</p>
<p>Counting chickens before they hatched? This poll demonstrates you don&#8217;t even have the eggs. Have you ever considered the fact that people tend to get more conservative as they get older? There are a lot of famous cliches built around that phenomenon, and like most cliches, there&#8217;s a lot lot of truth in them. I certainly became more conservative as I got older, and I&#8217;m not the only one. Think about that for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Balrog of Morgoth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173413</link>
		<dc:creator>A Balrog of Morgoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173413</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It’s not so socially acceptable, is it?

ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, there is that female Bishop who is taking over at the Harvard Divinity School who preaches that abortion is a gift from God.  Her name escapres me at the moment, but there is a leftist kook fringe who view abortion as though it were part of their Holy Trinity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It’s not so socially acceptable, is it?</p>
<p>ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, there is that female Bishop who is taking over at the Harvard Divinity School who preaches that abortion is a gift from God.  Her name escapres me at the moment, but there is a leftist kook fringe who view abortion as though it were part of their Holy Trinity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173240</link>
		<dc:creator>right4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173240</guid>
		<description>the only way to win this issue, is to turn the democrats in a pro-life party...the republicans are too gutless to be of any use to anyone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only way to win this issue, is to turn the democrats in a pro-life party&#8230;the republicans are too gutless to be of any use to anyone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canditaylor68</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173224</link>
		<dc:creator>canditaylor68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173224</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:50 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree. The abortion issue is a grassroots movement that begins at home with your children. It is truly changing the landscape of how our young adults are beginning to form their worldviews. Its working. Its also no small achievement to have liaisons working with families when a teenage girl does turn up pregnant to give her and her family the extended support they need. Quite a bit of this support is done through volunteer and religious organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ddrintn on May 4, 2009 at 7:50 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. The abortion issue is a grassroots movement that begins at home with your children. It is truly changing the landscape of how our young adults are beginning to form their worldviews. Its working. Its also no small achievement to have liaisons working with families when a teenage girl does turn up pregnant to give her and her family the extended support they need. Quite a bit of this support is done through volunteer and religious organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173196</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173196</guid>
		<description>^ For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It&#039;s not so socially acceptable, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ For example, not even the kookiest lefties are celebrating abortion the way they did a couple of decades or so ago. It&#8217;s not so socially acceptable, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 44Magnum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173188</link>
		<dc:creator>44Magnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173188</guid>
		<description>I know what kind of Pole Perez Hilton would LOVE to delve into.

Or.. have delved into.. umm, him.

/wretching</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what kind of Pole Perez Hilton would LOVE to delve into.</p>
<p>Or.. have delved into.. umm, him.</p>
<p>/wretching</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173185</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173185</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So you see…..until you can get that 2/3s to want to OVERTURN Roe v Wade, you guyz are screwed.
;)

strangelet on May 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Who says we need to overturn Roe v Wade? We can take a page from the lefty book and keep harping on the idea that abortion is a bad, bad thing...so bad that most women won&#039;t consider it. That seems to be working, at least in part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So you see…..until you can get that 2/3s to want to OVERTURN Roe v Wade, you guyz are screwed.<br />
;)</p>
<p>strangelet on May 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Who says we need to overturn Roe v Wade? We can take a page from the lefty book and keep harping on the idea that abortion is a bad, bad thing&#8230;so bad that most women won&#8217;t consider it. That seems to be working, at least in part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KickandSwimMom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173171</link>
		<dc:creator>KickandSwimMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The thing is, liberals HATE democracy in practice. They love tyranny of the few…particularly in robes! &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mommypundit on May 4, 2009 at 7:38 PM

Liberals hate democracy in practice because it does not flow their way.  Just like they are the tolerant party as long as you agree with them!  Example, I find the gay activists behaviour in California despicable.  There is no way the gays would have tolerated it if Prop 8 had gone their way and the heterosexuals started demonstrating to have it overturned.  I hope California does not let them get away with it - that will truly be outrageous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The thing is, liberals HATE democracy in practice. They love tyranny of the few…particularly in robes! </p></blockquote>
<p>Mommypundit on May 4, 2009 at 7:38 PM</p>
<p>Liberals hate democracy in practice because it does not flow their way.  Just like they are the tolerant party as long as you agree with them!  Example, I find the gay activists behaviour in California despicable.  There is no way the gays would have tolerated it if Prop 8 had gone their way and the heterosexuals started demonstrating to have it overturned.  I hope California does not let them get away with it &#8211; that will truly be outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173159</link>
		<dc:creator>gopmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173159</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gay people will always be around, like they have for thousands of years.
dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 7:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But they are still only 2-3% - a statistic with no merit or credibility, simply an unnatural anomaly.  Why are we allowing ourselves to be held hostage?  Because they &quot;own&quot; the Hollywood?

I think we need to look more closely at why the push to remake our country for the benefit of 3% of the population.  And why does their lobby have so much power and influence.  They&#039;ve corrupted the judicial system to attain what they call a civil right - when the public votes, they vote No.

It&#039;s ridiculous.  And I see no harm in continuing to keep the anti-gay marriage position part of the GOP platform.  There are gays in the GOP who are anti-gay marriage, for Pete&#039;s sake.  They don&#039;t want legal recognition of their union, they want to anger people.  It&#039;s an issue designed to divide the public so they can get their hands on more power.  How many Dems/Liberals know Obama&#039;s true position on gay marriage?   His position is the same as mine - civil unions, not marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gay people will always be around, like they have for thousands of years.<br />
dcwvu on May 4, 2009 at 7:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But they are still only 2-3% &#8211; a statistic with no merit or credibility, simply an unnatural anomaly.  Why are we allowing ourselves to be held hostage?  Because they &#8220;own&#8221; the Hollywood?</p>
<p>I think we need to look more closely at why the push to remake our country for the benefit of 3% of the population.  And why does their lobby have so much power and influence.  They&#8217;ve corrupted the judicial system to attain what they call a civil right &#8211; when the public votes, they vote No.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous.  And I see no harm in continuing to keep the anti-gay marriage position part of the GOP platform.  There are gays in the GOP who are anti-gay marriage, for Pete&#8217;s sake.  They don&#8217;t want legal recognition of their union, they want to anger people.  It&#8217;s an issue designed to divide the public so they can get their hands on more power.  How many Dems/Liberals know Obama&#8217;s true position on gay marriage?   His position is the same as mine &#8211; civil unions, not marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghoul aid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghoul aid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173157</guid>
		<description>Mommypundit on May 4, 2009 at 7:34 PM

yup. ever since i was attacked and called a full on racist and other unmentionable things on other blogs and in real life for supporting Hillary over Obama last year, a lot of things have changed. i used to go along with the liberal flow all of my life. i&#039;ve had anger over the war myself, but at some point, there is nothing left and you have to look at the big picture. don&#039;t waste your tears on ignorant morons. they are not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mommypundit on May 4, 2009 at 7:34 PM</p>
<p>yup. ever since i was attacked and called a full on racist and other unmentionable things on other blogs and in real life for supporting Hillary over Obama last year, a lot of things have changed. i used to go along with the liberal flow all of my life. i&#8217;ve had anger over the war myself, but at some point, there is nothing left and you have to look at the big picture. don&#8217;t waste your tears on ignorant morons. they are not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/04/cnn-poll-majorities-oppose-gay-marriage-pro-choice-now-just-plurality/comment-page-1/#comment-2173139</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=52044#comment-2173139</guid>
		<description>Two percent of Americans are homosexual according to the latest best research. Although questions about individual rights are not to be taken lightly, is it prudent to contort and fragment our culture, law and politics to accommodate the most non-compromising of this vanishingly small group?  Those who wish to engage in sexual relations of a homosexual sort are free to do so. They are not entitled to claim the status of marriage.  Even where same sex marriage is approved it is a hollow term conveying nothing but tax advantages and the like. No procreation, no contribution to the nation&#039;s future, nothing. I hear a distant rumbling. Please hold the purported parallels to interracial marriage. Men of all races are men and women of all races are women.  Being members of a single species they can procreate regardless of race. Family formation and procreation is destiny for families and nations. False,constructed counterfeits are an exercise in self delusion and narcissism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two percent of Americans are homosexual according to the latest best research. Although questions about individual rights are not to be taken lightly, is it prudent to contort and fragment our culture, law and politics to accommodate the most non-compromising of this vanishingly small group?  Those who wish to engage in sexual relations of a homosexual sort are free to do so. They are not entitled to claim the status of marriage.  Even where same sex marriage is approved it is a hollow term conveying nothing but tax advantages and the like. No procreation, no contribution to the nation&#8217;s future, nothing. I hear a distant rumbling. Please hold the purported parallels to interracial marriage. Men of all races are men and women of all races are women.  Being members of a single species they can procreate regardless of race. Family formation and procreation is destiny for families and nations. False,constructed counterfeits are an exercise in self delusion and narcissism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
