Comments on: New DHS folly: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon

By: OBAMA’S NEW TERRORISTS: AMERICANS « FactReal

OBAMA’S NEW TERRORISTS: AMERICANS « FactReal — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:44:59 +0000

[...] REPORT: DOMESTIC EXTREMISM LEXICON (dated March 26, 2009) According to Obama’s DHS these demographics are extremists (excludes Islamic groups): • White nationalists • Black nationalists • Mexican nationalists [...]

By: Sotomayor Repeatedly Referenced Wise Woman in Speeches « Inzax

Sotomayor Repeatedly Referenced Wise Woman in Speeches « Inzax — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:44:44 +0000

[...] transgression. Fortunately, she changed her mind because such views have been associated with domestic terrorism by DHS [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » Sotomayor member of La Raza for six years

Hot Air » Blog Archive » Sotomayor member of La Raza for six years — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:56:58 +0000

[...] Whelan finally discovered in researching the matter. That’s a good thing, too, because the DHS considers support for Puerto Rican independence as a potential indicator of domestic [...]

By: Six Meat Buffet » Blog Archive » What “freedom” is like in an Obama world

Sun, 31 May 2009 01:16:14 +0000

[...] Now why would local law enforcement agencies be selecting vehicles to pull over based on their bumper stickers? Oh yeah. [...]

By: Is That How You Talk To Your Mother? Emanuel and Obama Want To Repeal The Second Amendment And Take American People’s Guns Used To Defend Their Homes and Family? The Flying Fickle Finger of Fate Award Goes To Emanuel and Obama! « Pronk Palisad

Tue, 12 May 2009 03:25:50 +0000

[...] Seriously. …” [...]

By: Is That How You Talk To Your Mother? Emanuel and Obama Want To Repeal The Second Amendment And Take American People’s Guns Used To Defend Their Homes and Family? The Flying Fickle Finger of Fate Award Goes To Emanuel and Obama! « Pronk Palisad

Tue, 12 May 2009 03:23:39 +0000

[...] Seriously. …” [...]

By: The Weekend Claw 5-9-09 - AllMilitary.com's Military Blog

The Weekend Claw 5-9-09 - AllMilitary.com's Military Blog — Sat, 09 May 2009 06:04:51 +0000

[...] you believe in not giving drivers licenses to non-drybacks? Congratulations! You fit in the new definition of a domestic extremist according to Homeland Security Ditz Napolitano. Note that the report calls out all sorts of groups, [...]

By: Odin-airy People | Cold Fury

Odin-airy People | Cold Fury — Tue, 05 May 2009 20:49:25 +0000

[...] latest Homeland Security warns us of the threat posed by “Nordic mystcism“. A Norse is a Norse, of course, of course–and we’ve got to keep an eye on those [...]

By: New DHS folly: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon - Southern Maryland Community Forums

Tue, 05 May 2009 10:16:31 +0000

[...] New DHS folly: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon The Janet Napolitano-led Department of Homeland Security strikes gold again with a follow-up to its April 7th report casting conservative political positions as indicators of threats to national security. Raw Story and the Daily Beast report that DHS produced a

By: Leaning Straight Up » LSU: Just another Seattle Right Wing Extremist or something

Tue, 05 May 2009 07:21:53 +0000

[...] latest DHS report continues this. As Hot Air notes, the definition of right-wing extremism is back: (U) rightwing extremism: (U//FOUO) A movement of rightwing groups or individuals who can be [...]

By: long_cat

long_cat — Tue, 05 May 2009 03:01:02 +0000

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

Let’s roll.

By: E L Frederick (Sniper One)

E L Frederick (Sniper One) — Mon, 04 May 2009 16:03:07 +0000

U//FOUO

Interesting that it’s all marked unclassified // for offical use only

By: Timothy S. Carlson

Timothy S. Carlson — Mon, 04 May 2009 16:02:58 +0000

It’s really a surprise that we can understand Janet, and DHS, at all. It’s extremely hard to talk with your foot in your mouth.

This woman is up for consideration for the SCOTUS? Are they insane?

Can I borrow this doc for my blog? It makes the perfect companion piece for the other document they released.

By: Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah's Military Guys..

Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah's Military Guys.. — Mon, 04 May 2009 13:17:57 +0000

Homeland Defense Intel and Analysis……

…the gift that keeps on giving! Mind you, before I’m allowed to brief a 2 star or equivalent, my brief will have been examined and defended (by me) at least four different times. And that’s not talklng about what happens for a public re…

By: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon - Curiosity Blog

The Domestic Extremism Lexicon - Curiosity Blog — Mon, 04 May 2009 00:46:34 +0000

[...] http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/01/new-dhs-folly-the-domestic-extremism-lexicon/ [...]

By: bluelightbrigade

bluelightbrigade — Mon, 04 May 2009 00:15:26 +0000

I can’t believe this post didn’t have more pages of comments…

So, in typical BLB fashion:

F*** You, Janet.

By: john1schn

john1schn — Sun, 03 May 2009 22:58:44 +0000

Oh, please, nelsonknows…LGF has not ever been a mouthpiece for the GOP. There are increasingly fewer conservatives on the site now, but Chuckles the dancing clown has never been a GOP backer. He may have noticed that the Bush memos were fake, but that was AFTER others had, and he made the comparison nice and shiny so he would get more hits, driving up his revenue. With Chuckles, it’s ALL about the money. Left, right doesn’t matter. Remember when being free to make your opinions was OK on the site, as long as you didn’t violate the TOS? Well, even he doesn’t need to worry about those anymore. He’ll ban you for looking up banned members. He’ll ban you for saying “Heh.” Don’t laugh. It happened. He’ll ban you for posting critical information about him at OTHER sites. Chuckles is a putz, he’s always been a lib, and only 9/11 made hime jump on the anti-jihad bandwagon.

He used to be critical of the fact that Muslim women were forced to wear the burkha; now he advertises Muslim romance on his site.

LGF ain’t GOP; it’s all about the $$$$. Chuckles has gone over to the dark side in his quest for green. He doesn’t have principles; he has a bottom line.

By: nelsonknows

nelsonknows — Sun, 03 May 2009 22:23:26 +0000

Don’t foprget folks, Allahpundit threatened to ban people that critisized his opinion of Glenn Beck also, how soon we forget or do you want me to find THOSE posts in the archives?

By: nelsonknows

nelsonknows — Sun, 03 May 2009 22:21:10 +0000

LGF has ALWAYS been a GOP lockstep site. If you actually hold the GOP accountable you will be banned. GOP locksteppers are becoming as gutless as the leftist freaks.

By: john1schn

john1schn — Sun, 03 May 2009 14:24:30 +0000

As for LGF- it’s like he’s been replaced by a pod-person. I barely recognise the site any more.

Did you catch his tinfoil hat moment when he claimed that Bin Laden’s been dead for years but the US government is concealing that fact-

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/33520_Osama_Bin_Dead_%28For_a_Long_Time%29

Jay Mac on May 3, 2009 at 7:17 AM

Wow. Chucky the dancing clown has always believed that UBL has been worm food for a long time, but this is the first time that I remember him going into Loose Change territory…

By: Cybergeezer

Cybergeezer — Sun, 03 May 2009 13:12:33 +0000

How much more proof is needed that Obama is commiting TREASON?
Here it is;
http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

By: Jay Mac

Jay Mac — Sun, 03 May 2009 11:17:37 +0000

As for LGF- it’s like he’s been replaced by a pod-person. I barely recognise the site any more.

Did you catch his tinfoil hat moment when he claimed that Bin Laden’s been dead for years but the US government is concealing that fact-

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/33520_Osama_Bin_Dead_%28For_a_Long_Time%29

By: OneEyedJack

OneEyedJack — Sun, 03 May 2009 08:12:47 +0000

Language has been used as a weapon by the left for a long time….notice how terms are defined before the battle is waged. What the average person thinks a term means may be very different than what the official definition is.
We laugh at Clinton saying ” it depends on what the definition of is is”, but he understands that language can be very tricky to negotiate.
What is my point? Picture yourself at the next protest, if you went to a tea party and decided you”d do it again. Some law enforcement type, not necessarily identifiable as one, sidles up and starts asking questions about what you believe. You think that you’ve made contact with another freedom loving patriot, and admit that you think that the federal gov has stepped on states rights too much, think that the border laws should be enforced, that we are all equal before the law and should be treated that way, think the constitution is the law of the land, etc. etc….( a lot of conversation can happen in 2-3 minutes, when someone asks your opinion at a political rally).
In reality, you’ve just admitted to being in at least four of Janet Napolitano’s aforementioned “extremist groups”, and off to the re-education camp you go. OK, the camps aren’t there yet, but you get the idea.

The terms get defined, they don’t mean what you think they do. Saying you believe in something that the government has defined, or re-defined, could get you in trouble in this kind of environment.

By: GunRunner

GunRunner — Sun, 03 May 2009 02:39:55 +0000

“Tax Resisters” eh? well, somebody has noticed that the money is down. O-hole is setting up the IRS to do some kicking down doors.

By: New DHS folly

New DHS folly — Sun, 03 May 2009 02:37:32 +0000

[...] DHS folly Hot Air Blog Archive New DHS folly: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon New DHS folly: The Domestic Extremism Lexicon posted at 12:55 pm on May 1, 2009 by Ed Morrissey [...]