Democrats unhappy with Reid’s deal to get Specter

posted at 4:15 pm on April 29, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Don’t look now, but all is not smiles and cheers on Arlen Specter’s (new) side of the aisle.  Harry Reid agreed to allow Specter to keep his 28 years of seniority when he crossed, meaning that Specter will jump the line on committee assignments, especially in chairs.  Other Democrats who expected to get dibs are crying foul behind closed doors, and hint that they may renege on Reid’s deal:

Several Democrats are furious with Reid for agreeing to let Specter keep the seniority accrued over more than 28 years as a Republican senator. That could allow him to leap past senior Democrats on powerful panels – including the Appropriations and Judiciary committees.

One senior Democratic lawmaker told The Hill that the Democratic Conference will vote against giving the longtime Pennsylvania Republican seniority over lawmakers such as Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) when they hold their organizational meeting after the 2010 election.

Specter was elected in 1980, and under his deal with Reid would jump ahead of all but a few Democrats when it comes time to dole out committee chairmanships and assignments.

“That’s his deal and not the caucus’s,” the lawmaker said of Reid’s agreement with Specter.

According to Alexander Bolton, the most likely to be unhappy is Tom Harkin, who might lose his chair at a key HHS subcommittee.  The Democrats on the Judiciary Committee might also object if Specter takes Pat Leahy’s spot if Leahy gets the Appropriations chair.  Specter might also get the Appropriations slot if Leahy stays put, which would really touch off a row, since that’s the most coveted position for porkers.  Barbara Mikulski would lose her bid if that happened, and she’s also not likely to quietly accept her fate just to save Specter’s electoral bacon.

Senate Democrats tell the Hill that they have no reason to keep Reid’s commitment to Specter.  In fact, they think they’ve done enough for the Pennsylvania Republican, who was obviously about to lose his primary race to Pat Toomey in 2010.  As far as they see it, they allowed Specter into their caucus, which bumped other Democrats who intended to run for Specter’s seat in 2010, including Rep. Joe Sestak.

Given Specter’s baldly pragmatic reasons for switching, they don’t see the need to cough up plum committee assignments to a man who all but announced that he’s joining the caucus despite his policy preferences, and not because of them.  It’s hard to blame them, either.  It would be poetic justice if Specter discovers that his new pals want less to do with him than his old colleagues in the GOP.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

So Arlen is bought and paid for. Well that could mean two things. Either he’s a slave or a whore. Take your choice.

jeanie on April 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Who is this “We” crap?

BTW, guess what is going on with Russia… looks like I may be a Russian sooner then I thought. Help me Obama-One-yaphony!

upinak on April 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM

er uh um uh the fact is as I have er always said we underpaid Russia and were in fact uh Yankee Imperialists so uh have fun Sarah Wasilly….

//Ogabe

sven10077 on April 29, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Arlen Specter. The Man Without a Country Constituency. … friend?

trigon on April 29, 2009 at 8:43 PM

Let them all go to the Dems. Just like Delay pulled with W, the need to appease so many divergent constiuents will fracture the party in four years.

budfox on April 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM

So Arlen is bought and paid for. Well that could mean two things. Either he’s a slave or a whore. Take your choice.

jeanie on April 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Actually both imho

Vntnrse on April 29, 2009 at 9:43 PM

So Arlen is bought and paid for. Well that could mean two things. Either he’s a slave or and a whore. Take your choice.

jeanie on April 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM

Fixed it for you.

TugboatPhil on April 29, 2009 at 9:55 PM

Yeah, the Democrats don’t owe Specter anything in the way of plum assignments. Arlen didn’t have ‘a come to Jesus’ epiphany. He simply took the nearest port in a storm, the Democrat party (after investigating the options of going Independent). Are the ambitious Dems in PA simply going to roll over and let the architect of the single bullet theory walk away with the Democrat nomination? I don’t think so.

thegreatbeast on April 29, 2009 at 11:37 PM

So this is all assuming that Specter will win in 2010? I doubt that highly!

DannoJyd on April 30, 2009 at 12:17 AM

Attica, Attica, Attica!

Revolt of the lefties coming up next!

Hawthorne on April 30, 2009 at 8:33 AM

So this is all assuming that Specter will win in 2010? I doubt that highly!

Exactly. My position all along has been that it’s not a given that he now gets reelected, which all of these stories seem to be assuming. The Donks have their own primary and he’s not going to be particularly welcome there, especially given his support of Bush’s judicial nominees.

Why can’t he do the honorable thing like Phil Graham did so many years ago when he changed parties? He resigned and then got himself reelected as a Republican in a special election, his reasoning being that it would have been dishonest to his constituents to do otherwise.

What say you, Arlen?

jr.ewing.78 on April 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Comment pages: 1 2