Limbaugh to Specter: Do me a favor and take the McCains with you
posted at 4:46 pm on April 28, 2009 by Allahpundit
The quote’s slightly ambiguous but I think we can safely assume this is Rush’s own view, as it seems to reflect grassroots sentiment on Twitter and elsewhere. With the filibuster gone, there’s nothing left to lose. Purge ‘em all!
“A lot of people say, ‘Well, Specter, take [Sen. John] McCain with you. And his daughter [Meghan]. Take McCain and his daughter with you if you’re gonna…” he told listeners, dissolving in laughter.
“…..It’s ultimately good. You’re weeding out people who aren’t really Republicans,” he said.
Limbaugh did concede the downside of Specter’s defection. “It makes the Senate essentially as big a slam dunk for Obama and the Democrats as the House of Representatives already is,” he said.
McCain, Snowe, Collins, Grahamnesty: There are easily another five or six who could be “weeded out.” Of course, the bigger the Democrats’ advantage in seats, the longer it’ll take to recover the filibuster, let alone a majority. How long are you willing to wait for a backlash to Great Society II to sweep conservatism back to power? Bear in mind that the programs they pass while not even having to make minor concessions — health-care and amnesty, to name just two — won’t be un-doable once the GOP’s back in control, so every day we’re in the minority is one day closer to a permanent European model.
Here’s Benedict Arlen’s presser while you mull. This is a “painful decision” for him, blah blah blah. Pay attention especially to his surprising candor about how heavily the polls showing Toomey beating him like a drum weighed in his decision. At around 8:20, he all but admits that he made the switch to save his own ass after his internal polling last week showed he was finish. A true man of principle.
Update: Rock bottom for the GOP:
What’s notable about the Republican collapse is not simply its depth but its velocity. It was just a few years ago, in the wake of George W. Bush’s reelection, that books were being written on whether Republicans had acquired a virtually unbreakable hold on the levers of political power. After 2004, Republicans held a ten-vote advantage in the Senate.
The last time a political party suffered such grievous losses in the Senate during a compressed period was from 1976-1980, when the Democrats went from a post-Watergate high of 61 seats after Carter’s first election, to 45 seats as Ronald Reagan came in. The numbers are almost perfectly reversed: in the last four years, the Democrats have gone from a 45-55 deficit in the Senate after Bush’s reelection to 60 seats (or 59 with an asterisk) today.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Principles indeed.
Grow Fins on April 28, 2009 at 4:49 PM
!BUH BYE.
Willing to wait until stem cell helps the Repubs grow a pair and we start getting some real fiscal conservatives running.
400lb Gorilla on April 28, 2009 at 4:49 PM
Yay for total government control over your life, right?
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 4:49 PM
I question the timing of all this Specter crap.
What huge story did this knock out of the national conscience?
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Along with Snowe, Collins and Grahm… Clean house baby!
TheBigOldDog on April 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Buh-bye.
shick on April 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
political expediency pure and simple, like I said in another blog, I voted for this idiot twice when I lived in PA, but only cuz the alternative was far worse.
gsherin on April 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Here is the full transcript.
Michael in MI on April 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Rush gets richer the worse Republicans do. Its easier to rail against Democrats than rail against members of your own party who spend too much like Bush did.
Speedwagon82 on April 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM
HT: Redstate
Wethal on April 28, 2009 at 4:52 PM
Purgearama
therightwinger on April 28, 2009 at 4:52 PM
I wonder if, to an extent, the Democrats need the Republicans to stay in power. If there isn’t a huge opposition party to blame for your blunders and provide cover for your unpopular decisions, will their coalition fracture? Could this be the beginning of a third party in US politics?
TheUnrepentantGeek on April 28, 2009 at 4:52 PM
Not gonna miss Arlene, but it’s too bad that it takes an issue like this to get Steele fired up.
innominatus on April 28, 2009 at 4:53 PM
Wethal on April 28, 2009 at 4:52 PM
no way, he wouldn’t pull the trigger for something that cynical
gsherin on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Allah is right about the United States slouching towards European socialism, but the fact of the matter is that we’re already screwed – we will have national healthcare and amnesty and a generational Democrat majority in the United States. The 2008 election decided it. The only way things could get worse is if the Democrats get enough seats and state legislatures and can amend the US Constitution at will.
The conservative character of the United States is dead. The GOP, in order to be viable, will have to transform itself into the type of squishy conservatism that occasionally wins in Europe and Britain, but is largely irrelevant.
Frankly, this is awful. The only way we’ll be able to snap Americans back from this is a national bankruptcy or a horrendous terrorist attack, neither of which is something rational people should hope for.
Tabris on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Minor concessions? Other than that, how was the theatre, Mrs. Lincoln?
BigD on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Ditto.
But Meghan, first and foremost.
Daggett on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Toomey!
Now is the time to rally behind a patriot and put him in the senate. He was trying to be a senator and gave that up for us. He got rid of Arlen even without an election. How great is that. Now let us get rid of this waste of waste of human space once and for all.
Tommey! Start organizing now. We’ve to prove the moderates wrong. It’s our time. We booted out Arlen. We’ve to show the world that Toomey is electable. Hell, we’ve to show we’ll elect him.
promachus on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.’ And God granted it.” — Voltaire, speaking about the Limbaughs of his time
starfleet_dude on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Hard to believe what a selfish dope Specter is. Consider at one time he was the defense attorney to one of the all time worst murderers in American history.
Definitely some loose screws in Arlen’s noggin.
Could actually be chemo brain.
FireBlogger on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
One more reason for the rise of a third party with balls.
RandyChandler on April 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Uh-oh Megatons is not going to like this.
Coincidently, I LOVE IT!
RIGHT AS USUAL EL RUSHBO!
Branch Rickey on April 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM
And you. Yay for total government control over your life, as well? Yes?
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM
Let’s hope so; the Ronald Reagan Party.
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM
The third party in question: The Modern Whig Party
Everyone owes it to themselves to check it out.
Dr. Manhattan on April 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM
Un-doable?
I don’t think so. If it can be given in 100 days, it can be taken away in 100 days… fickle, fickle government.
Skywise on April 28, 2009 at 4:56 PM
Still worthless after all these years.
We need a new conservative political party in the worst way. I feel like Reagan:
.
saiga on April 28, 2009 at 4:56 PM
Nice that the de fatso leader of your party weighed in on this.
benny shakar on April 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM
The terrorism in Britain didn’t change a thing…If anything they are more muslim lovin’ there…….
nondhimmie on April 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Ass, meet screen.
These Socialists in Republican clothing were a Fifth Column in the Party. They were no more Republicans than Stalin was a humanitarian.
It is my hope that, just this once, it’s the Socialists who will get purged. It should’ve started with those who favored “chucking their free-market principles” in order to support the TARP, fascist model of economics.
Yes, Mr. Bush, I meant you.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM
That oughta explain it.
mankai on April 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM
As I’ve said for over a year, Specter is as corrupt as they come. When the NFL had a dispute with Comcast over the NFL Network, they called on their man in the Senate, Arlen Specter to drag the NFL through the mud in order to get the NFL to back down. Specter is owned by Comcast and their registered DC lobyist, Blank Rome LLP who have donated hundreds of thousands to Specter over the years (Check Opensecrets.org for yourself. Don’t just take my word for it). His only concern is his own a$$. I hope this is the beginning of the end of this turd.
TheBigOldDog on April 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM
Another yay! for total government control over you life.
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM
What’s the point of having a party if it doesn’t stand for any principles?
Let the RINO purges begin! I’m sick of Obama claiming “bipartisan support” for his socialist policies just because a few RINOs voted for them.
cool breeze on April 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM
I second this – I’d bet that this was rolled out strategically to mute an otherwise damaging story to O & Co. or pre-passage of some more crazy legislation to lend legitimacy to the whole thing. Why would Spector choose today to announce this? I will say that the Air Force 1 buzz of NYC was looking like it may have had legs until today. I wouldn’t put it past O to have Snowe and Collins waiting in the wings ready to switch when the time is right.
volnation on April 28, 2009 at 4:59 PM
so creative
blatantblue on April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
There isn’t any money left in the bank, man. It won’t last very long.
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Everything is un-doable.
Vashta.Nerada on April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Branch Rickey on April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Frankly, at this point I’m too numb from all the crap that has happened since inauguration day to care if the democrats have 60 seats or 65 seats.
Clean house… Let’s get this over with now. It’s way past time this occurred.
Nineball on April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Was that about Rush, or is Meghan Twittering?
BigD on April 28, 2009 at 5:01 PM
Hmmm…assuming you mean “consciousness”…..black helicopters over Utah? Bigfoot sighting in Peoria?
Grow Fins on April 28, 2009 at 5:01 PM
The only ones that really matter to me being weeded out are the ones that voted for Obama’s crazy porkulus-stimulus package.
deidre on April 28, 2009 at 5:01 PM
It has already started. The tea parties were a dress rehearsal.
Vashta.Nerada on April 28, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Now, the question is: Will Meghan take the bait?
/
Christien on April 28, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Don’t take just Specter and McCain . . . also take the Maine twins and Graham. Let’s get all of them at one time.
rplat on April 28, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Who cares? Specter is a liberal. Might as well dump all the other fakes. Please take Meghan McLame with you Specter. I can’t stand these RINOs.
jencab on April 28, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Celebrate. For your government mugged shareholders today and gave themselves 50% of a company and 39% of the company to its workers.
You are happy. Yes?
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 5:03 PM
I would join the REAGAN PARTY today…..it is time!
SDarchitect on April 28, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Compromising on core principles is what got us here. Don’t expect the recovery to be quick and painless. We have nobody to blame but ourselves for letting the RINOs destroy what RR built.
TheBigOldDog on April 28, 2009 at 5:03 PM
My two cents. I think its great that Spector left. And I agree that he should take all the other RINOs with him. At least we won’t have to hear about “bi-partisan”, if Snowe and such vote for it. Good riddance.
unrealcitizen on April 28, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Why not? Then he can sit at home in his momma’s basement and watch reruns of Star Trek all day long.
kirkill on April 28, 2009 at 5:04 PM
I hope we have good candidates for the Colorado, North Dakota and Arkansas Senate seats. Those should be pretty winnable.
Speedwagon82 on April 28, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Okay Dick, consciousness.
No, it knocked out your mother’s abortion that somehow survived to troll conservative websites 16 years later.
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 5:04 PM
You aren’t referring to that “low flying plane” that went through New York City terrorizing people, who were reminded of the 911 terror attack in New York, were you?
Loxodonta on April 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Bingo.
That’s the one.
It was a story that was growing.
Not so much anymore.
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
forget the shareholders. He mugged the debt holders who have the legal right to force both of those companies into bankruptcy and liquidation. But Obama has his hands on the banks balls so they can’t even exercise their legal rights. Instead the Government takes a big chuck and gives a piece to their constituents as a thank you for helping them get elected.
This country is on the edge….
TheBigOldDog on April 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
The more that I think about this, the more I think that Spector is a patsy and is being played by the Dems. Why would Obama et al want to prop up an 80 year senator with a history of health problems that could as weak politically as a Dem as he was in his own (ex-) party? I think that Obama knew that he needs an addl vote or two in the short term to shore up his agenda and Spector fit the bill for the next year or so. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Dems give Spector the collective boot once he votes for EFCA and NHC II. In real terms, even if re-elected he’s standing in the way of newer blood that could be a much longer political life that he offers.
volnation on April 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
We have never needed Blue Dogs like we need them today. Let’s hope a few of them get some backbone.
njcommuter on April 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
I am willing to wait until amnesty comes up. If these traitors push amnesty through, it will take the USA down. Then everyone will be trained to ignore laws, do what you want with no consequences, and screw as many fellow citizens as possible.
It will cause millions to kick back and join the millions of others at the public trough. Why bother working? Then, the trough will run dry and the $hit will hit the fan big time.
No amnesty, no gun control, no fairness doctrine, no crazy spending. Get back to the Constitution and allow the country to get back to the principals that made us great.
Right now, we are running full speed in the wrong direction.
saiga on April 28, 2009 at 5:08 PM
You know, if you go the WSJ coverage of this and peruse the reader comments, they aren’t very favorable to Specter.
BigD on April 28, 2009 at 5:08 PM
He really is one. It’s absurd
blatantblue on April 28, 2009 at 5:08 PM
Hilarious. Blue dogs are just there to keep R’s from getting elected. They’ll vote with D’s on every big issue, then break away on minor issues so they can pretend they are “independent”
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 5:09 PM
History repeating itself.
the_nile on April 28, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Agree. Unfortunately I’m afraid we have a one party dictatorship with a Republican Party to weak, confused and frightened to fight back. The future is bleak.
rplat on April 28, 2009 at 5:10 PM
But the MSM reported Obama had no responsibility for that at all. I think Obama released a statement:
I didn’t do it, no one saw me do it, there’s no way you can prove anything!
Loxodonta on April 28, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Bear in mind that the programs they pass while not even having to make minor concessions — health-care and amnesty, to name just two — won’t be un-doable once the GOP’s back in control, so every day we’re in the minority is one day closer to a permanent European model.
Exactly. It’s something DeMint doesn’t get at all.
radiofreevillage on April 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM
I’m not buying this line of thinking. I live in an area that is about 80% Republican and no one I know is willing to become “squishy”. If anything, they want a more conservative party. Almost everyone I talk to thinks Bush was a RINO and none of them wanted to vote for McCain because he was too liberal. If McCain was more conservative, he might have won. Unfortunately, the party is too tied to Bush’s low approval. They will get over it in a few years after we become the United Socialist States of America.
ExcessivelyDiverted on April 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM
IF the Pubbies had been able to stop or even slow down anything, you might have a point. However, thanks to those you just named, the Dems had to give up NOTHING to get their agenda through thus far.
Therefore, I see Specter, Collins, Snowe, McCain and Graham as the same roadblocks I see Reid, Kennedy, Feinstein, and Feingold. The first step is to jettison who we can. The second is to get competent replacements, preferably in the same election.
steveegg on April 28, 2009 at 5:13 PM
The nation never HAD Specter & RINO support as Republicans to begin with. Conservatives have backbone. What a relief to have the RINOs off our back.
The Democrat Monopoly must be held accountable for every jot and tittle they do wrong. NO EXCUSES.
maverick muse on April 28, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Not according to Janet Napolitano.
Loxodonta on April 28, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Until Obama recognizes that there is such a thing as a lazy, no good SOB, he will continue to make fantacy land decisions on health care and education.
He must learn to discourage bad behavior and encourage good behavior. It is an important principal of the real world. If you don’t get it, you will be abused and taken advantage of. Any successful business owner learns that, but Obama has no managenment experience to fall back on.
saiga on April 28, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Neither of those would turn the tide, they would simply be made to measure “crisis” for the Dems to accelerate the descent into socialism. If the tide ever turns back it will be through a reversal of the systematic degradation of out culture by the school system. Hollywood and the MSM.
Lets face it, our leaders reflect what the majority of American voters have become.
“A Republic, if you can keep it” This requires the strong principles and moral fiber we used to have.
neuquenguy on April 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
I did read at Ace’s that “he’s demanding answers” now.
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Electing people who waste public money, insult their voters and lie to their faces has really worked well for democrats.
lorien1973 on April 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
That’s how we got the Whigs.
steveegg on April 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Clean house, indeed. Then the GOP has a whole lot of work to do!
This could be the beginning of something good, or something really, really bad.
Daddy-O on April 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Everyone is assuming that the dems will not stab Specter in the back, and run a dem against him in the primary. They may think they need the vote now, and will take their chances in 2010.
Vashta.Nerada on April 28, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Links in the chain.
maverick muse on April 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM
The same prudence which in private life would forbid our paying our own money for unexplained projects, forbids it in the dispensation of the public moneys. – Thomas Jefferson, who loved liberty a bit more than Voltaire.
kirkill on April 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Wonder if Specter’s political gamesmanship will finally be enough to make PA voters see what they have wrought. He’s a lightweight and an opportunist–hope that’s not lost on them.
jeanie on April 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Great Society II doesn’t really matter. Amnesty will be permanent.
joeindc44 on April 28, 2009 at 5:18 PM
For those advocating a third party…better to reform the republican party. And those moderates wanting to create Democrat lite party…we need an opposite party so that voters can be clear in which direction to take government…toward more socialism, or to restore the republic.
In order for reform to take place, we have to hit rock bottom…its better for us to get rid of the moderates and get back to our principles, than to win the election…but lose the argument. Now is a good time to clean house…we are out of power, being more out of power isn’t going to change anything. But what it will do is allow us to focus as a laser…with one united voice, to the American people, that socialism is a drug to be avoided. That government is overweight and needs to go on a diet. American’s won’t listen if Republicans are just as fat as the democrats.
Conservative Voice on April 28, 2009 at 5:18 PM
If enough of the squishy RINOs leave the party, perhaps we will be left with only Reagan conservatives. Who knows, we might even be able to win elections again, like we did in 1980, 1984, 1994, etc.
Buford Gooch on April 28, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Loxodonta on April 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
I disagree. It might get knocked from the headlines, but that picture will look great in campaign ads. Caption: “Brought to you by Obama”
fluffy on April 28, 2009 at 5:19 PM
To be honest, I always thought Specter was already a Democrat.
eclark1849 on April 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM
I hope that is right.
Out of all of his mistakes in his first 100 days – and there were plenty of them, this was the biggest and most disturbing in my opinion.
carbon_footprint on April 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
The media won’t let the magic D’s take the blame for anything…but fortunately they are failing too.
gwelf on April 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
I’ve never been too keen on the third party idea, but I actually think it might have legs. Most of the Republicans only take a stand on an issue when it benefits them, so how much worse could we be represented by another party? What if we started another party and recruited those politicians that have actually stood up for their constituents’ principles. These key pols mixed with new blood could be the basis for the new party. In the short run we could very well lose, but really, could it be worse than where we’re headed?
kongzilla on April 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
The quote is rather unambiguous, IMO. He did not call for John McCain to leave the party. What he did do was express frustration with the ‘mavericky’ MSM loving activities that McCain seems to enjoy.
Most people that consider themselves conservative or libertarian understand this kind of frustration. When the GOP was winning, it was a lot easier to hold your nose and support them. Now that they are completely out of power, it’s time to start thinking out loud and figure out what’s next for this party.
Specter staying or leaving is a sideshow. The GOP needs to figure out what it stands for, or it will be a minority party forever.
Asher on April 28, 2009 at 5:21 PM
Better yet, animate Conservatism and win the election via argument.
maverick muse on April 28, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Its easier to Gain confidence in someone, or something, than it is to REGAIN confidence once you feel you are burned.
The Republican “brand” has been tarnished… and does not seem to be doing anything to rebuild itself.
Notice Spectre QUIT the Repubs… he was not thrown out as he should have been.
Romeo13 on April 28, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Well even if you are right about Obama and the 9/11-like photo op, Spector isn’t from New York City. So, what possible connection could there be between Obama, Spector, remembering the terror and the heroes of 9/11, and Pennsylvania?
Loxodonta on April 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Are you or are you not freevillage?
TheBigOldDog on April 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM
Damn right. Take them all out. Faster it is done the faster the party will recover.
jdun on April 28, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Of course that’s what will happen. Specter will have to get in line behind David Brooks, Doug Kmiec and all the others who were expecting the Jackson on the nightstand.
Mr. D on April 28, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Wow, getalife’s potted plant showed up.
Last time I heard, kid, Limbaugh had been on a dient that has resulted in him losing over 40 pounds in the past 2 months.
Jerome Nadler (D, NY) could not be reached for comment.
Del Dolemonte on April 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Good but how about: The CONSERVATIVE party.
portlandon on April 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »