<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shocker: News coverage of Obama better, nicer than with Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:57:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reality Check &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The media hate the truth, and they lie on behalf of Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2253744</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reality Check &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The media hate the truth, and they lie on behalf of Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2253744</guid>
		<description>[...] Shocker: News coverage of Obama better, nicer than with Bush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shocker: News coverage of Obama better, nicer than with Bush [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainstream Media: The Propaganda Arm of Big Government</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2252737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainstream Media: The Propaganda Arm of Big Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2252737</guid>
		<description>[...] Shocker: News coverage of Obama better, nicer than with Bush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shocker: News coverage of Obama better, nicer than with Bush [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pew: Media treatment of Obama much more positive than Bush, Clinton</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2170471</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pew: Media treatment of Obama much more positive than Bush, Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2170471</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week, the Center for Media and Public Affairs produced a study claiming that the national media treated Barack Obama better in his first 50 days than it had George Bush and Bill Clinton combined during their same 50-day introductions.  Critics dismissed CMPA&#8217;s study as biased, but they&#8217;ll have a more difficult time dimissing Pew Research as a right-wing flack.  In their 100-day look released last week, Pew notes that Obama got twice as much good press as Bush and 50% more than Clinton: As he marks his 100th day in office, President Barack Obama has enjoyed substantially more positive media coverage than either Bill Clinton or George Bush during their first months in the White House, according to a new study of press coverage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week, the Center for Media and Public Affairs produced a study claiming that the national media treated Barack Obama better in his first 50 days than it had George Bush and Bill Clinton combined during their same 50-day introductions.  Critics dismissed CMPA&#8217;s study as biased, but they&#8217;ll have a more difficult time dimissing Pew Research as a right-wing flack.  In their 100-day look released last week, Pew notes that Obama got twice as much good press as Bush and 50% more than Clinton: As he marks his 100th day in office, President Barack Obama has enjoyed substantially more positive media coverage than either Bill Clinton or George Bush during their first months in the White House, according to a new study of press coverage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2150528</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2150528</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why the MSM are correctly called &quot;fellating&quot; media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why the MSM are correctly called &#8220;fellating&#8221; media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahpalinfan99</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149730</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahpalinfan99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149730</guid>
		<description>Dang! I knew there was Media bias but this falls under a whole new category. I&#039;m surprised Obama&#039;s approvals are not at 80% or 90% with all this.

Let&#039;s dispense with the pretenses. The majority of the MSM in this country officially function as  &quot;Pravda&quot; tools for Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama literally has hundreds of press secretaries in addition to Gibbs. The Pravda MSM members also hide or will not report negative stories or facts about Obama. 

There are a few exceptions to the rule like Fox News, Wall Street Journal, and Conservative Talk Radio.

Conservatives and Libertarians face an enormous task to break through the MSM strangehold.

Sean Hannity, John Ziegler, Bernard Goldberg, Rush Limbaugh and others are right. Free and Unbiased Journalism is dead in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang! I knew there was Media bias but this falls under a whole new category. I&#8217;m surprised Obama&#8217;s approvals are not at 80% or 90% with all this.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s dispense with the pretenses. The majority of the MSM in this country officially function as  &#8220;Pravda&#8221; tools for Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama literally has hundreds of press secretaries in addition to Gibbs. The Pravda MSM members also hide or will not report negative stories or facts about Obama. </p>
<p>There are a few exceptions to the rule like Fox News, Wall Street Journal, and Conservative Talk Radio.</p>
<p>Conservatives and Libertarians face an enormous task to break through the MSM strangehold.</p>
<p>Sean Hannity, John Ziegler, Bernard Goldberg, Rush Limbaugh and others are right. Free and Unbiased Journalism is dead in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Greene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149376</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149376</guid>
		<description>The media ignoring or spinning the terrible job Obama has done in setting up a cabinet team,breaking pretty much every promise he made on the campaign trail,and getting lots of photo ops and pats on the back but no combat troops or any of his stimulus agenda is beyond corrupt and bias.

 It is really sickening to watch journalism sink to such ignorant activism and blatant partisan butt kissing.

 The only thing worse to watch happen than this,IS THE FACT THAT IT IS WORKING FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

 How in the he!! you can appoint corrupt and incompetent cabinet official one after the other.More than double the debt by spending more than all the previous Presidents put together. Have our enemies laughing at us all the while escalating their actions of aggression, but still pull high approval ratings combined with an incredible onslaught of butt kissing magazine covers and MSM articles is criminal on the part of our press.

 The Obama administration know that their sheep combined with the 5 minute news cycle voter block is more than enough to keep them in power. 
 That is why Obama can come out like he did and announce &quot;fiscal restraint&quot; and a commitment to &quot;cutting deficits&quot;
while he spends like a drunken sailor,providing little transparency and no accountability.
 He knows the Courics,Brian Williams,Olberman&#039;s,and NYtimes/Wapo will cover for him with little resistance from the weak Republican leadership on the hill.

 Pravda West in all it&#039;s glory.

 I noticed in Kurtz&#039;s story that Sullivan was there.
I wonder if he a Rahm have found out who the real mother of Trig is yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media ignoring or spinning the terrible job Obama has done in setting up a cabinet team,breaking pretty much every promise he made on the campaign trail,and getting lots of photo ops and pats on the back but no combat troops or any of his stimulus agenda is beyond corrupt and bias.</p>
<p> It is really sickening to watch journalism sink to such ignorant activism and blatant partisan butt kissing.</p>
<p> The only thing worse to watch happen than this,IS THE FACT THAT IT IS WORKING FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.</p>
<p> How in the he!! you can appoint corrupt and incompetent cabinet official one after the other.More than double the debt by spending more than all the previous Presidents put together. Have our enemies laughing at us all the while escalating their actions of aggression, but still pull high approval ratings combined with an incredible onslaught of butt kissing magazine covers and MSM articles is criminal on the part of our press.</p>
<p> The Obama administration know that their sheep combined with the 5 minute news cycle voter block is more than enough to keep them in power.<br />
 That is why Obama can come out like he did and announce &#8220;fiscal restraint&#8221; and a commitment to &#8220;cutting deficits&#8221;<br />
while he spends like a drunken sailor,providing little transparency and no accountability.<br />
 He knows the Courics,Brian Williams,Olberman&#8217;s,and NYtimes/Wapo will cover for him with little resistance from the weak Republican leadership on the hill.</p>
<p> Pravda West in all it&#8217;s glory.</p>
<p> I noticed in Kurtz&#8217;s story that Sullivan was there.<br />
I wonder if he a Rahm have found out who the real mother of Trig is yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll &#187; &#8220;The Obama Administration Is Doing Their Best To Keep New Yorkers On Their Toes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll &#187; &#8220;The Obama Administration Is Doing Their Best To Keep New Yorkers On Their Toes&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149173</guid>
		<description>[...] Manhattan is that with an once of foresight, it could have been a tremendous P.R. coup. The legacy media are hip deep in President Obama&#8217;s, err, pocket, so why not send Joe Biden or an Obama P.R. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Manhattan is that with an once of foresight, it could have been a tremendous P.R. coup. The legacy media are hip deep in President Obama&#8217;s, err, pocket, so why not send Joe Biden or an Obama P.R. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garydt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149170</link>
		<dc:creator>garydt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149170</guid>
		<description>Athensboy do you deny that the MSM is not biased? Back in 1964 they said the GOP was finished and no one liked them as you say now. Remember the pendulum always swings back or unless you want a one party nation (stalinism) which I do suspect. You probably favor a nation that would close down the free press, gun rights, freedom of religion, as any leftists would desire. I wish you were just a liberal then you would tolerate all views but as a leftist you only tolerate your party line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Athensboy do you deny that the MSM is not biased? Back in 1964 they said the GOP was finished and no one liked them as you say now. Remember the pendulum always swings back or unless you want a one party nation (stalinism) which I do suspect. You probably favor a nation that would close down the free press, gun rights, freedom of religion, as any leftists would desire. I wish you were just a liberal then you would tolerate all views but as a leftist you only tolerate your party line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZfederalist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149137</link>
		<dc:creator>AZfederalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149137</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and more positive assessments to boot.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 ... and in other news: &quot;The sky is blue and the sun is expected to rise in the east&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and more positive assessments to boot.</p></blockquote>
<p> &#8230; and in other news: &#8220;The sky is blue and the sun is expected to rise in the east&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wow! Evening Newscasts Have Covered Obama More Than Bush &#38; Clinton Combined</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2149077</link>
		<dc:creator>Wow! Evening Newscasts Have Covered Obama More Than Bush &#38; Clinton Combined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2149077</guid>
		<description>[...] The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California&#8217;s Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama&#8217;s presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California&#8217;s Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama&#8217;s presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Star20</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148837</link>
		<dc:creator>Star20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148837</guid>
		<description>athensprepubescent,

As you move to higher grades (hopefully), you will be blessed with new insights into sentence structure and something called &quot;paragraphs.&quot;  Pay attention.  It will be good for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>athensprepubescent,</p>
<p>As you move to higher grades (hopefully), you will be blessed with new insights into sentence structure and something called &#8220;paragraphs.&#8221;  Pay attention.  It will be good for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athensboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148770</link>
		<dc:creator>athensboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148770</guid>
		<description>The msm is in bed with Obama. The msm hated Bush. The msm hates conservatives. The press is biased. The gop can&#039;t come up with any new conspiracies on why Obama kicked McSame&#039;s ass. Dude, Americans don&#039;t like the gop. They like Obama. They didn&#039;t like Bush or Cheney. I know rejection is hard for you he-men, but thats just the way it is. Obama&#039;s popularity is killing you guys. Your doing everything in your power to dent it, and nothing is working. You can&#039;t stand it. To compensate you search with a fine tooth comb for anything you can to bring Obama down. You, like me, knows that the longer he stays popular, the harder your job gets. Your &quot;window&quot; is closing fast, this makes you more desperate, which in turns makes you more error prone, which ends up making you seem sillier than you already are. Normally this would cause you to take a step back, but you just can&#039;t.Your hatred for Obama overides any sense of decency or tact. So you just wildly strike out with any crap your demented minds can come up with. Dude, you lost the election, give it up. Try again in 2012. Obama is just way smarter than any of you conservatives, that just eats away at you. You won&#039;t last 4 years at the attack rate you are at now. But keep on flailing away at him, its great entertainment for us Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The msm is in bed with Obama. The msm hated Bush. The msm hates conservatives. The press is biased. The gop can&#8217;t come up with any new conspiracies on why Obama kicked McSame&#8217;s ass. Dude, Americans don&#8217;t like the gop. They like Obama. They didn&#8217;t like Bush or Cheney. I know rejection is hard for you he-men, but thats just the way it is. Obama&#8217;s popularity is killing you guys. Your doing everything in your power to dent it, and nothing is working. You can&#8217;t stand it. To compensate you search with a fine tooth comb for anything you can to bring Obama down. You, like me, knows that the longer he stays popular, the harder your job gets. Your &#8220;window&#8221; is closing fast, this makes you more desperate, which in turns makes you more error prone, which ends up making you seem sillier than you already are. Normally this would cause you to take a step back, but you just can&#8217;t.Your hatred for Obama overides any sense of decency or tact. So you just wildly strike out with any crap your demented minds can come up with. Dude, you lost the election, give it up. Try again in 2012. Obama is just way smarter than any of you conservatives, that just eats away at you. You won&#8217;t last 4 years at the attack rate you are at now. But keep on flailing away at him, its great entertainment for us Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148721</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148721</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey. getalife’s baby brother is back.
Which heavily Democrat over-sampled poll are you quoting now, kid? The AP one that sampled twice as many Democrats as Republicans, or the WaPo/ABC one that just came out that oversampled them by something like 19 points?
Del Dolemonte on April 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whoa Mr. Pineapple, your posts are all remarkably similiar: throw a few weak insults then deflect from the topic. If you&#039;d like to assert Obama is far less popular than it appears, please provide the information. Otherwise, once again, you&#039;ve got nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey. getalife’s baby brother is back.<br />
Which heavily Democrat over-sampled poll are you quoting now, kid? The AP one that sampled twice as many Democrats as Republicans, or the WaPo/ABC one that just came out that oversampled them by something like 19 points?<br />
Del Dolemonte on April 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa Mr. Pineapple, your posts are all remarkably similiar: throw a few weak insults then deflect from the topic. If you&#8217;d like to assert Obama is far less popular than it appears, please provide the information. Otherwise, once again, you&#8217;ve got nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickeehands</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148404</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickeehands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148404</guid>
		<description>The MSM has proven itself to be biased in the past, but the current degree is unprecedented.  They must protect the monster &lt;a href=&quot;http://stickeenotes.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/a-letter-to-america/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they created&lt;/a&gt;, but, if real world events continue to run contrary to the medias narrative, they may render themselves obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSM has proven itself to be biased in the past, but the current degree is unprecedented.  They must protect the monster <a href="http://stickeenotes.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/a-letter-to-america/" rel="nofollow">they created</a>, but, if real world events continue to run contrary to the medias narrative, they may render themselves obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148009</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148009</guid>
		<description>Ed:
You forget, the MSM made Obama.  They sold him to the American public.  They have behaved like whores and sold any credibility they&#039;ve had remaining to push Obama&#039;s agenda.  They are in a box of their own construction.  No way out, no other choice but to serve The One.  And we thought Baghdad Bob was comic relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed:<br />
You forget, the MSM made Obama.  They sold him to the American public.  They have behaved like whores and sold any credibility they&#8217;ve had remaining to push Obama&#8217;s agenda.  They are in a box of their own construction.  No way out, no other choice but to serve The One.  And we thought Baghdad Bob was comic relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2148007</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2148007</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Shocking that Obama would come out looking better than the worst President in history. The bar has been set exceedingly low.

Constantine on April 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey. getalife&#039;s baby brother is back.

Which heavily Democrat over-sampled poll are you quoting now, kid? The AP one that sampled twice as many Democrats as Republicans, or the WaPo/ABC one that just came out that oversampled them by something like 19 points?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Shocking that Obama would come out looking better than the worst President in history. The bar has been set exceedingly low.</p>
<p>Constantine on April 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey. getalife&#8217;s baby brother is back.</p>
<p>Which heavily Democrat over-sampled poll are you quoting now, kid? The AP one that sampled twice as many Democrats as Republicans, or the WaPo/ABC one that just came out that oversampled them by something like 19 points?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMightyMonarch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147825</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMightyMonarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147825</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The really sad thing is how long its taking the MSM to die.
The damage they’re doing in their death throes is considerable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Our leftist government isn&#039;t going to let their PR wing die anytime soon. The major media outlets will be deemed &quot;too important to fail&quot; and will become our version of state-run media. The content is already there, all we&#039;re missing is an official change in ownership.

The MSM dying is about as likely as American auto companies surviving without ejecting the unions and/or a continuous stream of taxpayer money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The really sad thing is how long its taking the MSM to die.<br />
The damage they’re doing in their death throes is considerable.</p></blockquote>
<p>Our leftist government isn&#8217;t going to let their PR wing die anytime soon. The major media outlets will be deemed &#8220;too important to fail&#8221; and will become our version of state-run media. The content is already there, all we&#8217;re missing is an official change in ownership.</p>
<p>The MSM dying is about as likely as American auto companies surviving without ejecting the unions and/or a continuous stream of taxpayer money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29Victor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147813</link>
		<dc:creator>29Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147813</guid>
		<description>..and yet with all of this good press he still has the same poll numbers that Bush had at this time in his first term, hmmmmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and yet with all of this good press he still has the same poll numbers that Bush had at this time in his first term, hmmmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147715</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147715</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the NYT is now junk, and CNN and msnbc ratings are tanking.

It is outrageous the way these socalled news agencies pander to the Obama administration. It is like watching them morph into Pravda. And more and more people are noticing it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the NYT is now junk, and CNN and msnbc ratings are tanking.</p>
<p>It is outrageous the way these socalled news agencies pander to the Obama administration. It is like watching them morph into Pravda. And more and more people are noticing it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147631</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fox Network to Obama: You suck too much for sweeps...&lt;/strong&gt;

OK..maybe they didn&#039;t exactly put it that way. Still, it&#039;s the thought that counts. And you know the bean-counters were thinking it. The Fox network is sticking with its regular schedule over President Barack Obama this week. The network is......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fox Network to Obama: You suck too much for sweeps&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>OK..maybe they didn&#8217;t exactly put it that way. Still, it&#8217;s the thought that counts. And you know the bean-counters were thinking it. The Fox network is sticking with its regular schedule over President Barack Obama this week. The network is&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147592</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147592</guid>
		<description>Shocking that Obama would come out looking better than the worst President in history. The bar has been set exceedingly low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocking that Obama would come out looking better than the worst President in history. The bar has been set exceedingly low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147587</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147587</guid>
		<description>Bill Clinton ran as a moderate, pro-business Democrat.  The wirters and editors in the major media outlets are hardcore. anti-business, pro-nanny-state leftists.  They love Obama&#039;s agenda as much as they love him.  With Clinton, they only loved Hillary, not the Clinton policy agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton ran as a moderate, pro-business Democrat.  The wirters and editors in the major media outlets are hardcore. anti-business, pro-nanny-state leftists.  They love Obama&#8217;s agenda as much as they love him.  With Clinton, they only loved Hillary, not the Clinton policy agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZCoyote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147515</link>
		<dc:creator>AZCoyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147515</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What’s with the Air Force One flyover of Groung Zero? 

Most photogenic admin evah!

dingbat on April 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Apparently they wanted some photos of AF-1 flying over the Statue of Liberty, or something.  More Obama propaganda (for those who can&#039;t get enough).  

Meanwhile, the sight of a large jetliner flying low over NYC with a military escort reportedly freaked out the local population and caused 9/11 survivors to experience PTSD symptoms.  The business channel reported that Goldman, Sachs were so frightened they temporarily emptied out their NYC offices.  Same channel also reported that the Obamabots in charge of this stunt refused to allow the public in NYC to have advance notice, so they wouldn&#039;t freak out.


But hey, it&#039;s all about the O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What’s with the Air Force One flyover of Groung Zero? </p>
<p>Most photogenic admin evah!</p>
<p>dingbat on April 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently they wanted some photos of AF-1 flying over the Statue of Liberty, or something.  More Obama propaganda (for those who can&#8217;t get enough).  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the sight of a large jetliner flying low over NYC with a military escort reportedly freaked out the local population and caused 9/11 survivors to experience PTSD symptoms.  The business channel reported that Goldman, Sachs were so frightened they temporarily emptied out their NYC offices.  Same channel also reported that the Obamabots in charge of this stunt refused to allow the public in NYC to have advance notice, so they wouldn&#8217;t freak out.</p>
<p>But hey, it&#8217;s all about the O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Dominion Blog Alliance</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147514</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Dominion Blog Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147514</guid>
		<description>[...] how the press is treating Barack so far, I&#8217;m betting this snafu—and yes: causing the panicked evacuation of a building would be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how the press is treating Barack so far, I&#8217;m betting this snafu—and yes: causing the panicked evacuation of a building would be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OkieDoc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/27/shocker-news-coverage-of-obama-better-nicer-than-with-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-2147444</link>
		<dc:creator>OkieDoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=51290#comment-2147444</guid>
		<description>Serves all you unilateral hemispheric thinkers right.
And as for the rest of ya,
didn&#039;t you read the textbooks in school or did you just sponge bob it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serves all you unilateral hemispheric thinkers right.<br />
And as for the rest of ya,<br />
didn&#8217;t you read the textbooks in school or did you just sponge bob it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
