The Wall Street Journal has an editorial by Representative Pete Hoekstra, regarding Barack Obama’s decision to inform our enemies about the details of the interrogation techniques we would be using against them to protect America:
Director of Nat…

Try again. Back it up to 1992.

Spiritk9 on April 24, 2009 at 3:26 PM

Wow, getalife’s aunt is here. Woof.

Sorry, kid, but in 1992 there were no political blogs, and basically no Internet, because Algore hadn’t invented it yet. Your hero’s critics had to get their message out by other means-until about 1998. Hillary wanted to censor the internet back then. Goebbels would be proud of her.

Tell us again why the Democrat who inherited an economic recovery that started 18 months before the media elected him in 1992 was above the law. And remember, his Administration had already successfully prosecuted a Federal employee for lying under oath about sex.

And while you’re at it, tell us why Clinton’s Justice Departmenr, in their 1998 Federal Indictment of bin Laden, said he was working with Iraq.

(sound of crickets)

I mean, he’s just so damn cool!

i thought this guy was a serious pollster.

sesquipedalian on April 24, 2009 at 1:36 PM

As opposed to sampling twice as many Democrats as Republicans, like AP did for the non-po;; they released Thursday?

Thanks for the laugh, kid.

Normally the appeal is an important process to defend Executive Privilege or protect National Security and to establish precedent

In some cases, scurilous politicians can have cohorts obtain a court order so the politican can pretend their hands were tied. Just a passing thought

That’s the name of the game these days, or has been since 2000.

AprilOrit on April 24, 2009 at 3:20 PM

Try again. Back it up to 1992.

AprilOrit on April 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM
proof positive that Monday’s isn’t the basis for all reflection

maverick muse on April 24, 2009 at 11:34 AM

We wade through the Far Right & the Far Left’s insanity & bullsh*t, bitchin’ & moanin’ trying to find the truth.

That’s the name of the game these days, or has been since 2000.

Rasmussen: 58% think Obama endangered nat’l security

By releasing the CIA memos during war, clearly then, Barack Hussein Obama committed a treasonous act. Constitutionally, all that’s required are two witnesses for a conviction.

Q: “Does the release of CIA memos on interrogation techniques help the image of the United States abroad or does it endanger the national security of the United States?”

i thought this guy was a serious pollster.

Currently 57% give him a grade of “C” or lower. When I was a kid, if we brought home a C we got the belt. Too bad my old man isn’t around to dole out the proper motivation to improve…

BSNBC is running a poll… “Give President Obama a grade”

He was at 50% giving him an “A” early this morning, but that has slid to 36% as of this writing, and now 39% are giving him an “F” (52% if you add the D’s).

Take a quick moment to let BSNBC know how you think the Precedent is doing so far…

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29493093

;)

Obama did compromise national security, and did it during war time. No president….and I mean no previous president, has EVER done this!!!

LOL! Yet you and your fellow college kids have absolutely no problem believing “polls” put out by al-AP, C-BS “news” and Newsweak, all of which have been vusted recently for massively oversampling Democrats.

Sorry, “busted”.

Weird-ass Rassmussen polls catering to what the GOP wants us to hear won’t cut it either.

starfleet_dude on April 24, 2009 at 11:56 AM

LOL! Yet you and your fellow college kids have absolutely no problem believing “polls” put out by al-AP, C-BS “news” and Newsweak, all of which have been vusted recently for massively oversampling Democrats.

In fact, the al-AP “poll” released yesterday (Thursday) had twice as many Democrats (36%) as Republicans (18%) in its “polling sample”. That’s no poll, it’s Josef Geobbels in 2009.

Thanks for the laugh, kid. Let us know when you learn to think for yourself.