Pawlenty to DFL: Any tax hike will get vetoed
posted at 4:55 pm on April 24, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Like most states, Minnesota has found itself in a large budget hole after the economic collapse last year. Like many states, its legislature has prepared a raft of tax increases to close the gap. Unlike most states, Governor Tim Pawlenty has given the DFL-controlled legislatures an ultimatum to cut spending, or else:
After remaining mostly silent while the Democrats who control the Minnesota Legislature wrote their tax and spending bills, Gov. Tim Pawlenty on Thursday broke his hush with a bang, blasting DFLers for failing to rein in soaring health and welfare spending and making it clear he will veto any tax increase bill that reaches his desk.
But Pawlenty said the gap between his and the Democrats’ budget-balancing plans is “closable” and they can finish their work by the May 18 constitutional deadline.
Democrats have proposed increasing taxes by $1.5 billion to $2.2 billion over the next two years to help plug a $4.6 billion hole in the state budget.
“They’re going to be very disappointed if they send me bills that increase taxes. They’re going to get vetoed,” Pawlenty told reporters during a briefing in his Capitol office.
“The Democrats need to stop thinking up a tax increase every day and start focusing on how they can contain and reduce spending.”
Pawlenty has to make a decision soon about running for a third term as governor or taking a break and looking for an opening on the national stage in 2012, either in a Senate run against Amy Klobuchar or a presidential run. This position doesn’t hurt Pawlenty either way. Minnesotans would wind up, as Pawlenty points out, having two of the highest state tax brackets in the nation if the state Senate passes the bill, and while Minnesotans might have been happy to pay taxes when times were good, right now they need capital in the market and not in the state capital.
Contrast this with the direction other governors have taken to close budget gaps. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is nominally Republican, beat up his own party in order to get approval for tax hikes — and then had to deal with a miscalculation of the budget immediately afterwards. Most states have hit the panic button, including Florida, where Republicans have cut the budget but also imposed highly regressive “sin taxes,” including cigarette and tobacco sales. They’re now worrying about the state’s bond rating in the Sunshine State.
Pawlenty, at least for now, has drawn a line in the sand. We’ll see if the DFL tests him, and whether he’s bluffing or not.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The last thing I heard on the radio today was that the tax increases would only last 4 years. Do the DFL think anyone is buying that BS?
Another bill that will get vetoed by T-Paw if it gets passed: A moratorium on the firing of any State or UMN employees. I kid you not.
strictnein on April 24, 2009 at 5:02 PM
If taxes go up, I suppose I could always sell my kid’s gold-plated swingset to raise cash.
Bishop on April 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Now if Pawlenty would undo his completely assinine ethanol subsidies…
chalons on April 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM
At $60K, that is quite a swingset!
carbon_footprint on April 24, 2009 at 5:05 PM
This should be an across the board mantra coming from every Republicans mouth. All the new programs and spending just create higher taxes to pay for at some later date. Spend and Tax libs.
canditaylor68 on April 24, 2009 at 5:05 PM
So Pawlenty is being blaimed for federal ethanol subsidies?
seven on April 24, 2009 at 5:05 PM
MN has its own subsidies, although they’re “only” $15 million a year. We’re kind of the ethanol state. For awhile we had 50% of the ethanol pumps in the US.
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/04/17/audit_recommends_end_to_ethanol_subsidies/
strictnein on April 24, 2009 at 5:07 PM
I’m not as opposed to state income tax hikes – if needed as a last resort – because at least the money stays in the state. Governments have to do certain things, and when times are tough they are asked to do more. I know there is graft and corruption in any government, we are, after all, only human, so again, as a last resort a state or local tax hike is far less offensive to me that a federal tax hike of any kind.
Sheerq on April 24, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Beck is dumping on Pawlenty for soon signing a bill authorizing, in effect, a DNA-at-birth registry. It sounds creepy.
BuckeyeSam on April 24, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Calling him on his bluff. He didn’t like the stimulus package yet he took every penny of it.
He won’t like the tax hikes yet he’ll sign off on every one.
ckoeber on April 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Hey Ed, I am watching Beck, also. Do you know anything about this DNA sample that is an issue in MN? Apparently the state takes a blood sample of EVERY baby born and tests it for whatever. And then instead of destroying the samples after a set amount of time, MN wants to keep the DNA on file indefinitely. Wow, Moms sued, and the judges sided with the mom, but the state has been playing “keepaway” ever since. Now the state is trying to change the law to allow them to keep the DNA for whatever the state wants to do with it in the future, including a genetic registry.
karenhasfreedom on April 24, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Good to see Pawlenty taking a stand,and after the Liberals have sucked the treasury dry of 7 trillion dollars,why not
jack up the taxes!!
More Hope and Change on parade!
canopfor on April 24, 2009 at 5:25 PM
Bravo for him! This idea that any gov job is a “job for life” is absurd. I’m fondly remembering Reagan firing the air traffic controllers. Bold decisions are what is needed.
zeebeach on April 24, 2009 at 5:29 PM
This is beyond creepy. I suppose the state will claim that it will help keep identity crime down as they will use a mouth swab at traffic stops for identification.
portlandon on April 24, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Why is it that, when revenues to cover previous (over) spending legislatures increase taxes? When a normal household runs into these situations, owners cut back.
Guess any given legislature thinks money grows in the taxpayer/producers wallet.
SeniorD on April 24, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Bold prediction – the DFL will test him multiple times, Pawlenty will veto, but there will be enough “Pubbies” in the Legislature to override most of those vetoes.
steveegg on April 24, 2009 at 5:47 PM
Perhaps time for some local Tea Parties, then.
Wethal on April 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Governor Arnie better stand by. We have a vote coming up in about 3 weeks on 6 propositions being pushed by the pirates in Sacramento to close the budget gap. The first puts a ‘cap’ on state spending, but doesn’t specify how, then it also includes an endorsement to continue the elevated sales tax for two more years. Right now it looks like those propositions are going to be shoved right back up their collective asses.
You think Arnie has problems now, just wait. And add to that, the first of the DOUBLED registration fees on automobiles are starting to hit the mail.
GarandFan on April 24, 2009 at 6:23 PM
CA will rue the day the Dems and Reps raised taxes. The Dems for doing it and the Reps for going along and then lying about opposing the increases.
Ca will be like Michigan, business activity will decline further, revenue targets will be missed and the hole, which already is bigger than the current plan “fixes” by $8B, will be just that much deeper.
Arnie met the the boys from SEIU and signed a contract that excludes anyone in the union from layoff if the state runs out of money. Unemployment is 3rd highest in the country and SEIU members have secure jobs and benefits no matter what.
And the State Senate passed “card check” law to promote unionizing farm workers. For the 3rd year in a row. Unions can’t get a national law because it is too clear what a disaster it would be. CA? Disaster is laying off a union employee.
It is a madhouse and I am getting out of here sometime…
Harry Schell on April 24, 2009 at 6:27 PM
I disagree Steve. The DFL has a veto proof margin in the Senate, but there’s enough mod dems to sustain a veto even there, e.g. Terri Bonoff. We have a three vote margin in the House. The House GOP caucus won’t override on the income tax; we’ll hold there. The main problem is the 2010 election, which Ed does not expand upon. If the DFL takes the Gov mansion, which they haven’t held in over 20 years, all those income taxes will be passed and they’ll be permanent. And it’ll take years to reduce them. There are solid liberal majorities in both houses. That’s why there’s something like eight legit DFL gov candidates right now, and maybe more to come, e.g. Rybak, Anderson Kelliher.
IR-MN on April 24, 2009 at 6:29 PM
Oh, and GarandFan is right. The Props are at all odds going to inserted firmly into the nether regions of the savants in Sacto, sans lubricant.
The cap is a total hoax. The pols have overplayed their hands on this one.
Harry Schell on April 24, 2009 at 6:31 PM
I wrote here that the DFL (That’s Minnesotan for ultraliberal) isn’t united on this bill. A DFL House committee chairman was quoted in his hometown newspaper as ripping the DFL leadership of not dealing with reality.
(God, I love it when the DFL House is divided.)
LFRGary on April 24, 2009 at 6:56 PM
God only knows (sorry AP) what they will do in MN, don’t forget they gave us Ventura and Frankin
KBird on April 24, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Heard yesterday that RI is so broke that the Governor cut off all welfare to many folks, with the stipulation that they could re-apply this Monday but to expect a thorough screening to keep out and get rid of the cheats. Not sure how I feel about that. Realize that cheats need to be gotten rid of, but to drag the truly sick and truly handicapped into it could cause deaths while they wait since this would also include medications and hospital care I should think. Risky approach in my opinion.
jeanie on April 24, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Read My Lips?
Tzetzes on April 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM
Minnesota Democrats are busy trying to turn Minneapolis into Detroit, and the Capitol City next door, St.Paul, into Sacramento. Pawlenty, God bless him, is the only thing standing in their way.
RBMN on April 24, 2009 at 9:42 PM
And Pawlenty’s asinine law requiring Minnesota energy companies to buy ever increasing amounts of green energy at a huge price premiums.
And Pawlenty’s asinine championing of a regional Cap & Trade tax program.
At one time I thought that Pawlenty was destined for national politics, but sadly, Governor Tim “Green Jeans” Pawlenty is a High Priest in Al Gore’s Global Warming religion.
No Thanks!
RJL on April 24, 2009 at 10:10 PM
I hope he runs for re-election. There is no way he would for president.
deidre on April 24, 2009 at 10:18 PM
I suspect you’re right Gary. The true believers in the big cities think that they can get by with raising taxes, but some of the suburban legislators have to be sweating a little bit about this one. And for those who don’t know, Gary writes the Let Freedom Ring blog. He’s one of the most respected conservative bloggers in Minnesota.
T-Paw is about as conservative a politician as can be elected to statewide office in Minnesota. We have our conservative areas, which is how we are able to send John Kline and Michelle Bachmann to Washington, but the blue areas are really, really blue. T-Paw has done a pretty good job to date on holding the line on taxes and I’m certain that he will veto whatever comes out of the legislature in this session.
Mr. D on April 24, 2009 at 10:44 PM
State tax hikes can’t close a 4.6 billion dollar gap alone.
Spending has to be cut! If everyone else has to cut budgets the Gov’t should be forced to do the same.
Chaz706 on April 25, 2009 at 12:05 AM