<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamateurism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Porkulus Follies: Weatherization program a flop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-3418753</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Porkulus Follies: Weatherization program a flop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-3418753</guid>
		<description>[...] industries thanks to federal subsidies for weatherizing older homes.  In fact, as early as April 2009, Obama began bragging about the new jobs that his tax credits on weatherization and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] industries thanks to federal subsidies for weatherizing older homes.  In fact, as early as April 2009, Obama began bragging about the new jobs that his tax credits on weatherization and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Still no rush to hire construction workers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2136480</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Still no rush to hire construction workers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2136480</guid>
		<description>[...] his Earth Day speech on Wednesday, Barack Obama claimed that Porkulus and its tax breaks for weatherization and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his Earth Day speech on Wednesday, Barack Obama claimed that Porkulus and its tax breaks for weatherization and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2135530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2135530</guid>
		<description>Such programs are fine...but don&#039;t try to pass it off as some kind of panacea for the country&#039;s economic woes...TOTUS, pleeez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such programs are fine&#8230;but don&#8217;t try to pass it off as some kind of panacea for the country&#8217;s economic woes&#8230;TOTUS, pleeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viking999</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2135290</link>
		<dc:creator>viking999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2135290</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;First off, saving $350 a year on energy savings is not “like a tax cut”.  He tried making that same argument about lower interest rates on mortgages, too.  The grant helps in paying for the weatherization, but the cost savings are just that.  A tax cut is when government takes less of your money, not when energy companies take less of your money.  By that definition, a broken lightbulb is like a tax cut, too, and thanks to cap-and-trade, it’ll get you used to the dark, too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gotta call you to task for this one.  For the first time ever, by the way.

To the individual receiving the benefit, the $350 in energy cost reduction is no better or worse than a $350 tax cut.  They are financially equivalent.  Yes, the money may be directly coming from the energy companies, but the savings is a result of the government intervention.  The government caused a $350 per year cost savings for this person.  If you&#039;re only worried about yourself, who cares where it comes from?  Is it the same as a tax cut?  No.  But it is &quot;like a tax cut&quot; from the individual&#039;s financial perspective.

IMO, the real questions about this government intervention are the following:

1) Why benefit only select individuals instead of everyone?

2) Is the money being spent judiciously?

3) Is it the government&#039;s place to decide how to invest our money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>First off, saving $350 a year on energy savings is not “like a tax cut”.  He tried making that same argument about lower interest rates on mortgages, too.  The grant helps in paying for the weatherization, but the cost savings are just that.  A tax cut is when government takes less of your money, not when energy companies take less of your money.  By that definition, a broken lightbulb is like a tax cut, too, and thanks to cap-and-trade, it’ll get you used to the dark, too.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gotta call you to task for this one.  For the first time ever, by the way.</p>
<p>To the individual receiving the benefit, the $350 in energy cost reduction is no better or worse than a $350 tax cut.  They are financially equivalent.  Yes, the money may be directly coming from the energy companies, but the savings is a result of the government intervention.  The government caused a $350 per year cost savings for this person.  If you&#8217;re only worried about yourself, who cares where it comes from?  Is it the same as a tax cut?  No.  But it is &#8220;like a tax cut&#8221; from the individual&#8217;s financial perspective.</p>
<p>IMO, the real questions about this government intervention are the following:</p>
<p>1) Why benefit only select individuals instead of everyone?</p>
<p>2) Is the money being spent judiciously?</p>
<p>3) Is it the government&#8217;s place to decide how to invest our money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Paradise</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2135003</link>
		<dc:creator>Coastal Paradise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2135003</guid>
		<description>Or you might get a letter in the mail on electricity that usage is not in the equation anymore. For me it started in February. Now the calculation is # of people in the household +x square footage X some Obama math that only he knows = 40% increase! Dont think I am fibbing.....I will send you a copy! Just wait till you get yours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you might get a letter in the mail on electricity that usage is not in the equation anymore. For me it started in February. Now the calculation is # of people in the household +x square footage X some Obama math that only he knows = 40% increase! Dont think I am fibbing&#8230;..I will send you a copy! Just wait till you get yours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133987</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Construction has lost jobs for three successive months, shedding 126,000 of them in March alone.  Government jobs dropped by 5,000.  Specialty trade contractors have 83,000 workers in March, the bulk of the construction jobs lost — and this is at the beginning of spring, traditionally when these firms add staff for the expected jump in demand.  Of all industries, only manufacturing and professional/business services did worse.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, but think of how much worse it would have been if Obama hadn&#039;t &quot;saved&quot; an unknowable amount of jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Construction has lost jobs for three successive months, shedding 126,000 of them in March alone.  Government jobs dropped by 5,000.  Specialty trade contractors have 83,000 workers in March, the bulk of the construction jobs lost — and this is at the beginning of spring, traditionally when these firms add staff for the expected jump in demand.  Of all industries, only manufacturing and professional/business services did worse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, but think of how much worse it would have been if Obama hadn&#8217;t &#8220;saved&#8221; an unknowable amount of jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LifeTrek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133834</link>
		<dc:creator>LifeTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133834</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ATTENTION CAPTAIN ED -- IT&#039;S EVEN WORSE, THESE AREN&#039;T OBAMA&#039;S CUTS!
&lt;/strong&gt;
Ed, the tax credit for windows and doors and insulation are NOT NEW -- &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;They aren&#039;t Obama&#039;s to claim credit for!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

They were there for the past few years, up till the 2008 tax year that is,  They were not reauthorized, most likely because it is an annual authorization and congress decided to be petty and not pass an actual budget instead allowing Obama to start on day one with HIS budget.

This allowed the credit (10% on new windows, doors, insulation) to expire but left in place the credit on solar or alternative energy systems.

It was then reinstated for 2009 in the budget -- amazingly screwing every person who planned on it for 2008.  It cost a good friend of mine $800 because the did windows in November and not January!  He got the credit the previous year ($300) on new doors.
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ATTENTION CAPTAIN ED &#8212; IT&#8217;S EVEN WORSE, THESE AREN&#8217;T OBAMA&#8217;S CUTS!<br />
</strong><br />
Ed, the tax credit for windows and doors and insulation are NOT NEW &#8212; <em><strong>They aren&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s to claim credit for!</strong></em></p>
<p>They were there for the past few years, up till the 2008 tax year that is,  They were not reauthorized, most likely because it is an annual authorization and congress decided to be petty and not pass an actual budget instead allowing Obama to start on day one with HIS budget.</p>
<p>This allowed the credit (10% on new windows, doors, insulation) to expire but left in place the credit on solar or alternative energy systems.</p>
<p>It was then reinstated for 2009 in the budget &#8212; amazingly screwing every person who planned on it for 2008.  It cost a good friend of mine $800 because the did windows in November and not January!  He got the credit the previous year ($300) on new doors.<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama The Captivating Public Speaker Puts Top Economic Advisor To Sleep: Again &#171; Peace and Freedom Promises</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133489</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama The Captivating Public Speaker Puts Top Economic Advisor To Sleep: Again &#171; Peace and Freedom Promises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133489</guid>
		<description>[...] http://hotair.com/archives/2009/ 04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/</a> 04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133401</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133401</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

This qualifies as an “amateurism”?

At worst, this is (unfortunately) standard mucking up of statistics to make a political point. Hardly amateurish.

orange on April 23, 2009 at 1:18 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Standard mucking up of statistics is being amateur bcs it relies upon the public being &#039;amateur&#039; enough not to understand any of it.
He&#039;s making a political point by deliberately &#039;mucking up&#039; the facts which = LYING.
I guess you may in fact be right in that Obama is not an amateur when it comes to lying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>This qualifies as an “amateurism”?</p>
<p>At worst, this is (unfortunately) standard mucking up of statistics to make a political point. Hardly amateurish.</p>
<p>orange on April 23, 2009 at 1:18 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Standard mucking up of statistics is being amateur bcs it relies upon the public being &#8216;amateur&#8217; enough not to understand any of it.<br />
He&#8217;s making a political point by deliberately &#8216;mucking up&#8217; the facts which = LYING.<br />
I guess you may in fact be right in that Obama is not an amateur when it comes to lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133388</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133388</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jvette on April 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That $hit is criminal. And so are insurance companies.
Legalized extortion. 
I certainly hate being forced to have a Farm/Ranch policy.
Nearly $2500/yr for liability just bcs someone trespassing might get hurt &amp; sue me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jvette on April 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That $hit is criminal. And so are insurance companies.<br />
Legalized extortion.<br />
I certainly hate being forced to have a Farm/Ranch policy.<br />
Nearly $2500/yr for liability just bcs someone trespassing might get hurt &amp; sue me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el rey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133236</link>
		<dc:creator>el rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133236</guid>
		<description>One place (maybe the only place) the &quot;stimulus&quot; has worked so far is in the guns and ammo sector.  Obama should be named the firearms salesman of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One place (maybe the only place) the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; has worked so far is in the guns and ammo sector.  Obama should be named the firearms salesman of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2133082</link>
		<dc:creator>orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2133082</guid>
		<description>This qualifies as an &quot;amateurism&quot;?

At worst, this is (unfortunately) standard mucking up of statistics to make a political point.  Hardly amateurish.  

It&#039;s fine if you want to point out where you disagree with how Obama is using the numbers here.  Totally fair game.  But to call this amateurish is a bit silly.

That&#039;s kind of the problem you run into when you create a daily feature without being sure you&#039;re actually going to have content to fill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This qualifies as an &#8220;amateurism&#8221;?</p>
<p>At worst, this is (unfortunately) standard mucking up of statistics to make a political point.  Hardly amateurish.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s fine if you want to point out where you disagree with how Obama is using the numbers here.  Totally fair game.  But to call this amateurish is a bit silly.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of the problem you run into when you create a daily feature without being sure you&#8217;re actually going to have content to fill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132999</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132999</guid>
		<description>I am truly scared by this. When gas prices shot up at $4 a gallon, that hurt us. Badly. It really did a number on our budget. Not to mention food prices, went up considerably.

When we were hit by hurricanes Rita, and Ike....we were without power completely, for a week. A generator helps, but when gas prices are so high, you really have to be discretionary on what you use it on, and how much you use it. We used it for the fridge, and the washing machine. After Ike, we used it at night for a small window a/c, just so we could sleep. After Rita, we were hit with 100 degree days, every day we were without power. It wasn&#039;t easy, and heat stroke was always near, on a daily basis.

Now to have this forced on us, because some people decided global warming was here....they force their beliefs on the rest of us. Why do I have a feeling this won&#039;t bother any of those in Washington, since we&#039;ll probably be paying for their electric, and gas bills.

I&#039;m so damned angry about this. This is insane!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am truly scared by this. When gas prices shot up at $4 a gallon, that hurt us. Badly. It really did a number on our budget. Not to mention food prices, went up considerably.</p>
<p>When we were hit by hurricanes Rita, and Ike&#8230;.we were without power completely, for a week. A generator helps, but when gas prices are so high, you really have to be discretionary on what you use it on, and how much you use it. We used it for the fridge, and the washing machine. After Ike, we used it at night for a small window a/c, just so we could sleep. After Rita, we were hit with 100 degree days, every day we were without power. It wasn&#8217;t easy, and heat stroke was always near, on a daily basis.</p>
<p>Now to have this forced on us, because some people decided global warming was here&#8230;.they force their beliefs on the rest of us. Why do I have a feeling this won&#8217;t bother any of those in Washington, since we&#8217;ll probably be paying for their electric, and gas bills.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so damned angry about this. This is insane!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jvette</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132972</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Badger40 on April 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was told that if I installed the heater myself, then if something happened the insurance company could refuse to pay.
They get you coming and going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Badger40 on April 23, 2009 at 12:24 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I was told that if I installed the heater myself, then if something happened the insurance company could refuse to pay.<br />
They get you coming and going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132947</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132947</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Jvette on April 23, 2009 at 12:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I am so glad I live in the country.
I can build just about any damned thing I want &amp; no one is going to come out &amp; &#039;inspect&#039; me.
On the other hand, if I want to insure it, I may be forced to play by those stupid rules.
After over 20 yrs of being insured with the same company (NODAK Mutual)-they dumped us unceremoniously bcs of our old wood stove in the entryway-the same wood stove they approved of for all of those 20+yrs.
And then they had the nerve to keep billing us, even though they dropped us!
So we went with Farmer&#039;s Union. I hope they don&#039;t pull the same crap in 20yrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jvette on April 23, 2009 at 12:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I am so glad I live in the country.<br />
I can build just about any damned thing I want &amp; no one is going to come out &amp; &#8216;inspect&#8217; me.<br />
On the other hand, if I want to insure it, I may be forced to play by those stupid rules.<br />
After over 20 yrs of being insured with the same company (NODAK Mutual)-they dumped us unceremoniously bcs of our old wood stove in the entryway-the same wood stove they approved of for all of those 20+yrs.<br />
And then they had the nerve to keep billing us, even though they dropped us!<br />
So we went with Farmer&#8217;s Union. I hope they don&#8217;t pull the same crap in 20yrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jvette</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132934</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You will probably have to choose from a list of approved installation companies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Last December I had to replace my water heater. The last time I had to, I had a neighbor who knew how to install it help. He charged me nothing, I gave him a twelve pack of beer.

This time however, I found out that a new law had been passed that said that a licensed plumber had to install all appliances. The cost for installation was now at least $300.00 on top of the cost of the heater and the county had to issue a permit at a cost of another $200.00. 

Talking to one of the plumbers I had contacted for an estimate, he told me that in the last local election, a plumber had been elected to the assembly and introduced the bill that was eventually passed.

But, hey, after about 20 years of usage, I should save a couple hundred dollars in water heating bills. So, I got that going for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You will probably have to choose from a list of approved installation companies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Last December I had to replace my water heater. The last time I had to, I had a neighbor who knew how to install it help. He charged me nothing, I gave him a twelve pack of beer.</p>
<p>This time however, I found out that a new law had been passed that said that a licensed plumber had to install all appliances. The cost for installation was now at least $300.00 on top of the cost of the heater and the county had to issue a permit at a cost of another $200.00. </p>
<p>Talking to one of the plumbers I had contacted for an estimate, he told me that in the last local election, a plumber had been elected to the assembly and introduced the bill that was eventually passed.</p>
<p>But, hey, after about 20 years of usage, I should save a couple hundred dollars in water heating bills. So, I got that going for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherOpinion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132905</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherOpinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132905</guid>
		<description>Will someone a liberal will hear and believe call Obama on these &#039;distortions&#039;?  If not, then his &#039;truth&#039; triumphs.  Heck, even if his statements are somehow corrected and retracted, he got his version of &#039;I&#039;m a good guy&#039; story out there, which won&#039;t be entirely forgotten.  I hate the kool-aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will someone a liberal will hear and believe call Obama on these &#8216;distortions&#8217;?  If not, then his &#8216;truth&#8217; triumphs.  Heck, even if his statements are somehow corrected and retracted, he got his version of &#8216;I&#8217;m a good guy&#8217; story out there, which won&#8217;t be entirely forgotten.  I hate the kool-aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluelightbrigade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132893</link>
		<dc:creator>bluelightbrigade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132893</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the Messiah. Facts &amp; accurate details are for losers. 
/&quot;I won.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the Messiah. Facts &amp; accurate details are for losers.<br />
/&#8221;I won.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallard T. Drake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132872</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallard T. Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132872</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;joe_doufu on April 23, 2009 at 11:57 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s Obamanomics. Inflate your tires and we no longer need the oil industry. Weather-strip your doors and windows and we no longer need the coal industry. Ain&#039;t life grand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>joe_doufu on April 23, 2009 at 11:57 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s Obamanomics. Inflate your tires and we no longer need the oil industry. Weather-strip your doors and windows and we no longer need the coal industry. Ain&#8217;t life grand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe_doufu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132857</link>
		<dc:creator>joe_doufu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132857</guid>
		<description>This line also looks fishy:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Through this step, over the next three decades, we’ll save twice the amount of energy produced by all the coal-fired power plants in America in any given year.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Coal provides about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfr.org/publication/9801/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;23%&lt;/a&gt; of our energy, I think. So he&#039;s saying our energy use will be cut by 46%? Or is he saying our energy use is going to grow, but grow less than some straw-man projection? (Sort of like how he&#039;s &quot;saving money&quot; by not funding a decade of Iraq surges.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This line also looks fishy:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Through this step, over the next three decades, we’ll save twice the amount of energy produced by all the coal-fired power plants in America in any given year.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Coal provides about <a href="http://www.cfr.org/publication/9801/" rel="nofollow">23%</a> of our energy, I think. So he&#8217;s saying our energy use will be cut by 46%? Or is he saying our energy use is going to grow, but grow less than some straw-man projection? (Sort of like how he&#8217;s &#8220;saving money&#8221; by not funding a decade of Iraq surges.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132822</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132822</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow. Your AC unit has lasted 25 years? 
AZCoyote on April 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m guessing the unit was probably not made in China, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wow. Your AC unit has lasted 25 years?<br />
AZCoyote on April 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the unit was probably not made in China, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132815</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132815</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;News2Use on April 23, 2009 at 11:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You will probably have to choose from a list of approved installation companies.
They will of course charge more for their services bcs they are &#039;licensed&#039; to do such work.
This reminds me of the homeland security $$ that went out to local communities for things like firetrucks &amp; equipment, tractors for airports, fencing, etc...
Our local fire dept in a town of about 350 people received a brand new firetruck from homeland security.
There was a special bed that had to go on the pick-up so a man could sit on the back &amp; run a hose.
There was a place in town that did work like this, but the govt said the bed had to be ordered from one place &amp; then the pick up had to be driven down many hundreds of miles away to get the bed put on, costing thousands more than it should have. But that was the only way they could get most of the truck paid for.
Another case in point:
our local air strip received a mandate from homeland security &amp; $$ to buy a tractor to clear snow &amp; debri off of the runway.
The govt required our small town of about 950 people to purchase a 4 wheel drive brand new spendy tractor for this purpose-a SUPREME waste of $$.
This TARP $$ &amp; all these grants will be spent the same way.
Wasteful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>News2Use on April 23, 2009 at 11:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You will probably have to choose from a list of approved installation companies.<br />
They will of course charge more for their services bcs they are &#8216;licensed&#8217; to do such work.<br />
This reminds me of the homeland security $$ that went out to local communities for things like firetrucks &amp; equipment, tractors for airports, fencing, etc&#8230;<br />
Our local fire dept in a town of about 350 people received a brand new firetruck from homeland security.<br />
There was a special bed that had to go on the pick-up so a man could sit on the back &amp; run a hose.<br />
There was a place in town that did work like this, but the govt said the bed had to be ordered from one place &amp; then the pick up had to be driven down many hundreds of miles away to get the bed put on, costing thousands more than it should have. But that was the only way they could get most of the truck paid for.<br />
Another case in point:<br />
our local air strip received a mandate from homeland security &amp; $$ to buy a tractor to clear snow &amp; debri off of the runway.<br />
The govt required our small town of about 950 people to purchase a 4 wheel drive brand new spendy tractor for this purpose-a SUPREME waste of $$.<br />
This TARP $$ &amp; all these grants will be spent the same way.<br />
Wasteful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jvette</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132794</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Many voters evidently think like this &amp; that is why they love Obama.

Badger40 on April 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah but Obama has convinced these people that it will be other people&#039;s money. There is nothing an Obama supporter loves more that other people&#039;s money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Many voters evidently think like this &amp; that is why they love Obama.</p>
<p>Badger40 on April 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah but Obama has convinced these people that it will be other people&#8217;s money. There is nothing an Obama supporter loves more that other people&#8217;s money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZCoyote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132789</link>
		<dc:creator>AZCoyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132789</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve got a 25YO AC unit that is about ready to give up the ghost.


MarkTheGreat on April 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow.  Your AC unit has lasted 25 years?  I&#039;m guessing you don&#039;t live in Arizona.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve got a 25YO AC unit that is about ready to give up the ghost.</p>
<p>MarkTheGreat on April 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow.  Your AC unit has lasted 25 years?  I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t live in Arizona.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News2Use</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/23/obamateurism-of-the-day-27/comment-page-2/#comment-2132724</link>
		<dc:creator>News2Use</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=50928#comment-2132724</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Might want to &lt;strong&gt;look into that&lt;/strong&gt; one. I’ve got a 25YO AC unit that is about ready to give up the ghost.

I won’t feel guilty, I pay over $15K in taxes every year. (Not over 30 years) It will be nice to get something back for once.

MarkTheGreat on April 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Look HERE&lt;a href=&quot;http://energystar.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/energystar.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2426&amp;p_created=1145981147&amp;p_sid=rBQTz1sj&amp;p_accessibility=0&amp;p_redirect=&amp;p_lva=&amp;p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX3Jvd19jbnQ9MjgsMjgmcF9wcm9kcz0zMTImcF9jYXRzPSZwX3B2PTEuMzEyJnBfY3Y9JnBfcGFnZT0x&amp;p_li=&amp;p_topview=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
Especially this:
The law specifies installation costs include: &quot;expenditures for labor costs properly allocable to the onsite preparation, assembly, or &lt;strong&gt;original installation&lt;/strong&gt; of the property.&quot;
.
I question the original installation versus a replacement installation to qualify for the credit, unless it is a geothermal heat pump.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Might want to <strong>look into that</strong> one. I’ve got a 25YO AC unit that is about ready to give up the ghost.</p>
<p>I won’t feel guilty, I pay over $15K in taxes every year. (Not over 30 years) It will be nice to get something back for once.</p>
<p>MarkTheGreat on April 23, 2009 at 9:40 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Look HERE<a href="http://energystar.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/energystar.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2426&amp;p_created=1145981147&amp;p_sid=rBQTz1sj&amp;p_accessibility=0&amp;p_redirect=&amp;p_lva=&amp;p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9zb3J0X2J5PSZwX2dyaWRzb3J0PSZwX3Jvd19jbnQ9MjgsMjgmcF9wcm9kcz0zMTImcF9jYXRzPSZwX3B2PTEuMzEyJnBfY3Y9JnBfcGFnZT0x&amp;p_li=&amp;p_topview=1" rel="nofollow"><br />
Especially this:<br />
The law specifies installation costs include: &#8220;expenditures for labor costs properly allocable to the onsite preparation, assembly, or <strong>original installation</strong> of the property.&#8221;<br />
.<br />
I question the original installation versus a replacement installation to qualify for the credit, unless it is a geothermal heat pump.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
