Hillary: I don’t consider Cheney a reliable source on “torture”

The hits just keep coming for the “smart power” gang that can’t shoot straight:

(via drudge)

The border for dummies

National Post editorial board

National Post Published: Wednesday, April 22, 2009
http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/story.html?id=1520295

Can someone please tell us how U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano got her job? She appears to be about as knowledgeable about border issues as a late-night radio call-in yahoo.

Ouch!! that’s gotta hurt!!
Greatest transition eeeeevvvvvvvvvvvaaaaaaa!!!

“illegal immigration is not a crime”
“bogus DHS report she has to apologize for”

The U.S. Homeland Security chief has clarified earlier remarks that suggested the 9-11 terrorists entered the U.S. through Canada.

“Yes, Canada is not Mexico, it doesn’t have a drug war going on, it didn’t have 6,000 homicides that were drug-related last year,” she said.

“Nonetheless, to the extent that terrorists have come into our country or suspected or known terrorists have entered our country across a border, it’s been across the Canadian border. There are real issues there.”

When asked if she was referring to the 9-11 terrorists, Napolitano added: “Not just those but others as well.”

“Unfortunately, misconceptions arise on something as fundamental as where the 9-11 terrorists came from,” said Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador in Washington.

What a genius!!!
“smart power” at it’s finest!!!!
Another Obama appointee that has no clue what the he!! they are doing.

Now Hillary and Obama can’t answer direct questions concerning their cut-and-paste memo release of “enhanced interrogations”.

Even the politico is calling them out for incompetence:

(via drudge)

Obama muddles torture message
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21569.html

President Barack Obama’s attempt to project legal and moral clarity on coercive CIA interrogation methods has instead done the opposite — creating confusion and political vulnerability over an issue that has inflamed both the left and right.

In the most recent instance, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair acknowledged in a memo to the intelligence community that Bush-era interrogation practices yielded had “high-value information,” then omitted that admission from a public version of his assessment.

But now they look like the scarecrow, pointing in both directions. They got the policy right, but they look confused and beaten down by critics.”

Because Cheney called their bluff and has made the “smart ones” look like a bunch of fools.

Hillary needs to tell jokes to deflect from the total joke that the Obama administration has become.

Just release all the memos and the total conversations of democrats being briefed on these policies where they agreed with them 100%.
liberals need to quit being afraid of the truth.
Total discloser and transparency.

Baxter Greene on April 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM

Speaking of credibility, it was not that long ago that Obama
himself said Hillary had none:

No Raining on Obama’s Parade, As Nets Fail to Remember Attacks on Hillary
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-noyes/2008/12/01/no-raining-obama-s-parade-nets-fail-remember-attacks-hillary
By Rich Noyes (Bio | Archive)
December 1, 2008 – 15:32 ET

Less than nine months ago, the Obama campaign was slamming Hillary Clinton as utterly unqualified on foreign policy, having had no substantive experience during her husband’s administration and being dreadfully wrong in her judgment as a Senator when it came to “the most critical foreign policy judgment of our generation,” the war in Iraq.

Senator Clinton’s Claims of Foreign Policy Experience Are Exaggerated
By Greg Craig
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/clintons_exaggerated_experienc.html

To: Interested Parties

From: Greg Craig, former director, Policy Planning Office, U.S. State Department

RE: Senator Clinton’s claim to be experienced in foreign policy: Just words?

There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton played an important domestic policy role when she was First Lady. It is well known, for example, that she led the failed effort to pass universal health insurance. There is no reason to believe, however, that she was a key player in foreign policy at any time during the Clinton Administration. She did not sit in on National Security Council meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the Situation Room. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy, nor did she have her own national security staff. She did not do any heavy-lifting with foreign governments, whether they were friendly or not. She never managed a foreign policy crisis, and there is no evidence to suggest that she participated in the decision-making that occurred in connection with any such crisis. As far as the record shows, Senator Clinton never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue – not at 3 AM or at any other time of day.

The Clinton campaign’s argument is nothing more than mere assertion, dramatized in a scary television commercial with a telephone ringing in the middle of the night. There is no support for or substance in the claim that Senator Clinton has passed “the Commander-in-Chief test.” That claim – as the TV ad – consists of nothing more than making the assertion, repeating it frequently to the voters and hoping that they will believe it.

This rebuke is not from the “Right-Wing Conspiracy” that Mrs. Credibility likes to site all the time,
IT IS A SMACK DOWN FROM THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN!!!!

Baxter Greene on April 23, 2009 at 12:58 AM