Obamateurism of the Day

posted at 8:05 am on April 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

This one got caught by Fox News on the day Barack Obama committed this Obamateurism, but I don’t recall any other news agency picking up on the fact that either the President didn’t bother to find out when the botched Bay of Pigs invasion occurred — or forgot his own birthday. Neither made Obama look like a genius:

Ortega denounced the U.S.-backed attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro’s new Communist government in Cuba in 1961, a history of US racism and what he called suffocating U.S. economic policies in the region.

In his 17-minute address to the summit, Obama departed from his prepared remarks to mildly rebuke Ortega.

“To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old. Too often, an opportunity to build a fresh partnership of the Americas has been undermined by stale debates. We’ve all heard these arguments before.”

Actually, the president misspoke on the sequence of events in Cuba. The invasion of CIA-trained rebels at the Bay of Pigs in Cuba occurred in April 1961. Obama was born August 4, 1961.

Even forgiving the stupid (and easily checkable) mistake on the dates, Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange. He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama. Who cares when Obama was born? What does that have to do with the price of sugar in the Western Hemisphere, anyway? And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

And honestly, how hard is it to study a little on the bigger events in Latin American history and get the dates right before opening his mouth and proving himself embarrassingly ignorant?

Got an Obamateurism of the Day? If you see a foul-up by Barack Obama, e-mail it to me at obamaisms@edmorrissey.com with the quote and the link to the Obamateurism. I’ll post the best Obamateurisms on a daily basis, depending on how many I receive. Include a link to your blog, and I’ll give some link love as well. And unlike Slate, I promise to end the feature when Barack Obama leaves office.

Illustrations by Chris Muir of Day by Day. Be sure to read the adventures of Sam, Zed, Damon, and Jan every day!

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

I’m not so sure about that.

BadgerHawk on April 21, 2009 at 8:09 AM

Well, the answer to those and other questions is of course…..Oh look, a puppy!

DrAllecon on April 21, 2009 at 8:09 AM

Understandable mistake. See, August was when his mother finally brought him to the U.S.

/ducks

LastRick on April 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Actually, the president misspoke on the sequence of events in Cuba.

Then: The pResident is an idiot!

Now: The President simply misspoke.

Enoxo on April 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM

bambi thinks world events are all about him

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:13 AM

this whole “misspoke” was on another blog this weekend. many deplored bambi’s lack of American history info. He didn’t know his Monroe Doctrine (as most of us don’t either). but he does have a staff which the rest of us do not have to have all this stuff researched before fed into the teleprompter.

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:16 AM

Maybe Obama thinks he’s America,as well as POTUS,
and all 57 States!!(Sarc).

canopfor on April 21, 2009 at 8:16 AM

Isn’t that the sign of an unseasoned writer? I,I,I; everything in the first person.

fluffy on April 21, 2009 at 8:17 AM

and furthermore, when many children were in American schools learning about Geo. Washington, Thos. Jefferson & other American facts, bambi was in Indonesia learning something completely different.

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:17 AM

Understandable mistake. See, August was when his mother finally brought him to the U.S.

/ducks

LastRick on April 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Heh , his story is falling apart..

the_nile on April 21, 2009 at 8:17 AM

Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange.

L’etat c’est moi !

Hubris raging amok.

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 8:18 AM

He has a pathological need to identify with events in the Kennedy era. Do you remember how he talked about how he was brought home by Kennedy Foundation or something like that?

promachus on April 21, 2009 at 8:20 AM

In his 17-minute address to the summit, Obama departed from his prepared remarks to mildly rebuke Ortega.

Thus the reason of TOTUS…whenever he “ventures” off his prepared remarks, this is what we get.

TOTUS is not happy, and when TOTUS ain’t happy, ain’t no one happy!

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM

We’re not sure how intelligent Obama is until the intelligent quotient of the teleprompter has been determined. We know that his social skills are conducive to impressing murdering dictators and bowing to those he feels are superior, but actual intelligence remains under further review.

volsense on April 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM

And then there is this… Is it an Obamateurism? You decide…


FBI spied on TEA Party Americans

Exclusive to the Northeast Intelligence Network & Canada Free Press

Douglas J. Hagmann, Director & Judi McLeod, Founding Editor, Canada Free Press

cover041919 April 2009: Even as average Americans were planning to get out in towns and cities to demonstrate against Big Government and Big Taxes, Federal Bureau of Intelligence Investigation (FBI) surveillance was being unleashed upon them. In fact, unsuspecting Tax Day TEA Party participants were being closely watched during the demonstration planning stages in a covert operation that began on or about March 23, 2009.

If you one of the estimated 750,000 Americans who attended one of about 600 TEA parties last week, you might have seen media cameras covering the event. Media cameras, however, were not the only cameras taking video at these events, something that has at least one current FBI agent concerned over the future of America. According to this agent – the same agent who provided the Northeast Intelligence Network (NEIN) exclusively the unreleased photographs of the 11 missing Egyptian students who were the subject of a FBI BOLO in August 2006–placed his concerns for true patriots of the U.S. over his own career when he confided that covert surveillance was “planned and performed” at each of the TEA parties that took place last Tuesday.

“Listen to what I am saying,” stated the source during an interview with Doug Hagmann, founder (NEIN). “The Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Assessment that is receiving so much attention is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, and the true patriotic citizens of this country are on the Titanic. This is what bothers me. But is goes far beyond that assessment. There have been very significant changes made over the last few years that redirect the focus and assets of the intelligence community internally. These changes have greatly accelerated under this administration, and the threats have been redefined to include those who used to be patriots. It’s not only chilling but absolutely insulting to God-fearing Americans.”

According to this unimpeachable source, a single-page confidential directive issued by the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC (FBIHQ) was sent to each of the 56 field offices located across the United States on or about March 23, 2009, instructing the Special Agents in Charge (SACs) of those offices to verify the date, time and location of each TEA Party within their region and supply that information to FBI headquarters in Washington. The source stated this correspondence termed the TEA parties “political demonstrations,” and added that the dissemination of the directive was very tightly controlled. “Not all agents were privy to this correspondence,” stated the source, who compared the dissemination to an older “Do Not File” classification.

In addition to obtaining or confirming the location and time of each “demonstration,” each field office was instructed to obtain or confirm the identity of the individual(s) involved in the actual planning and coordination of the event in each specific region, and include the local or regional Internet web site address, if any. The information collected by region was then reportedly sent to FBI Headquarters.

The source alleges that a second directive was issued on or about April 6, 2009 that reportedly instructed each SAC to coordinate and conduct, either at the field office level and/or with the appropriate resident agency, covert video surveillance and data collection of the participants of the TEA parties. Surveillance was to be performed from “discreet fixed or mobile positions” and was to be performed “independently and outside of the purview of local law enforcement.”

Although the level of detail collected from each operation is unclear, the information was reportedly submitted to Washington, where, “at the level of the National Security Branch (NSB), this information was to “include the office of the Directorate of Intelligence (DI), and integrated with a restricted access database, one that reportedly is accessible to only two agencies” [of the 14 agencies that comprise the U.S. intelligence community, according to the source.

“The implications to the citizens of the U.S. are ominous. It seems that there is a hostile political agenda coming from Washington that characterizes the supporters of our constitutional freedoms as threats to our domestic security, which is totally absurd. The redirection, the refocusing of domestic threats from al Qaeda cells to ‘flag waving right-wingers’ is something that has gone from a murmur a few years ago to a roar today.”

Training government-issued cameras on ordinary citizens, many of whom brought their children to an estimated 600 Tax Day TEA Parties is a page torn out of George Orwell’s 1984 and makes the term “God Bless America” more meaningful than ever.

The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press expect the government’s denial of the surveillance of the TEA Parties to go viral as soon as this story is posted.

doriangrey on April 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM

I don’t think,Historical facts,or events,is high on
the list of Liberals eduaction!

The last thing a Liberal needs to know is American history,
or for that matter,any of the worlds history!

For those Liberals who fail to learn from History,they are
doomed to repeat it!!

As in, Obama!!

canopfor on April 21, 2009 at 8:23 AM

Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange. He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

Some would beg to differ. I thought Rush pretty well laid out the Obama Doctrine on his show yesterday.

BigD on April 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Who cares when Obama was born?

Who cares indeed! Up till now the concern has been where he was born, not when. Now we need a good investigative reporter to check on male babies born in Kenya around January 1961 who traveled to Hawaii in early August 1961!

Just kidding, but I couldn’t resist.

All the same, do you really believe that the smartest President we have ever had can’t remember his own birthday? or the date of one of the many events in our nation’s history that he considers to be proof of what a terrible country we were before we elected him? Sort of “creepy” don’t you think?

Or maybe he just got thrown off his prepared remarks because Ortega brought this up before he had a chance to apologize for it.

Ordinary American on April 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Crap,forgot the C in education!Ugh!

canopfor on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

I don’t recall any other news agency picking up on the fact….

maybe because they are interested in important things. you have to be fox news to immediately look up his birth date and calculate the months (as it happens, the 3 months are correct, just the other way). gotcha!

Who cares when Obama was born?

exaclty.

Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange.

he works in mysterious ways.

hint: it’s part of his communications strategy to get a new start on diplomatic relationships and break with the past. the more America is personalized in him, a hugely popular figure, the more difficult for a chavez, castro or morales to demonize us. he’s got an amazing amount of political capital abroad to shield and absorb criticism.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

“Actually, the president misspoke on the sequence of events in Cuba. The invasion of CIA-trained rebels at the Bay of Pigs in Cuba occurred in April 1961. Obama was born August 4, 1961.”

I appreciate Obama’s public admission that he was a baby while still in his mother’s womb and that he suggests we ought choose our birthdates based on some time before we leave it.

Dusty on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM

and to doriangrey: i fully believe someone was filming the richmond tea party. and i was with a vietnam vet so you know i am a subversive type.

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 AM

doriangrey on April 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM

you lost me at 750,000

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:31 AM

to sesq: i haven’t read where the Europeans love bambi. or the Turks. are you reading other articles suggesting that the Europeans love him?

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:31 AM

Obama was born August 4, 1961

We know that because it’s on his “official Certificate of Live Birth”.

imshocked on April 21, 2009 at 8:34 AM

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

maybe because they are interested in important things.

Like new puppies

you have to be fox news to immediately look up his birth date and calculate the months (as it happens, the 3 months are correct, just the other way). gotcha!

or perhaps they have a command of basic facts like number of States in the Union, how to pronounce ‘Orion’. Small things in the greater scheme of things, but he provides an endless supply.

Ed decided to call this feature ‘Obamateurism of the Day’ because he recognized the TOTUS’ ability to learn on the fly.

fluffy on April 21, 2009 at 8:35 AM

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

L’etat, c’est Barack…

gridlock2 on April 21, 2009 at 8:35 AM

doriangrey on April 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM

I can’t comment on the accuracy of this article, but it could explain the three men with very expensive video equipment who filmed the crowd from our courthouse steps. I thought at the time that they must be filming for local news agencies, but there was no photo or video broadcast coverage of our small town Tea Party. Now I wish I had approached them to ask who they were.

Dee2008 on April 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM

“To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old.

Well that holds true for me also. I was not born when slavery was instituted so why should I have to pay retribution or feel guilty for it????

Rick007 on April 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM

Understandable mistake. See, August was when his mother finally brought him to the U.S.

/ducks

LastRick on April 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM

An anecdote just for sh!ts and grins.
My father was born in Ireland while his family was back there for a visit. His father had not been naturalized yet, so when they got back to the US a month or so later the birth date was “adjusted” to make the child a natural born citizen.

oldernwiser on April 21, 2009 at 8:37 AM

“I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me…”

It’s all about him, isn’t it? It must have killed him not to be able to say the Bay of Pigs was Bush’s fault.

Barb Dwyer on April 21, 2009 at 8:37 AM

In his 17-minute address to the summit, Obama departed from his prepared remarks to mildly rebuke Ortega.

The problem is that Hussein al-Chicago cannot accomplish what a high school Public Speaking student can: think extemporaneously. He cannot work with simple 3×5 note cards, he requires the entire text that TOTUS provides him. He is so thoroughly dependent upon TOTUS that one’s conjecture about his ‘pillow talk’ requires TOTUS. Even then, his feigned words have less than hollow overtones.

SeniorD on April 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM

Obama is a narcissist. Its all about him.

becki51758 on April 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM

Next, Obama will sing “I Me Mine” and apologize that The Beatles were born before he was.

profitsbeard on April 21, 2009 at 8:41 AM

And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

The current Euro-socialist states don’t have a cult of personality.

Fascist regimes tend to have a cult of personality. It’s all about the leader.

rbj on April 21, 2009 at 8:41 AM

It’s all about him, isn’t it? It must have killed him not to be able to say the Bay of Pigs was Bush’s fault.

Barb Dwyer on April 21, 2009 at 8:37 AM

+10

promachus on April 21, 2009 at 8:42 AM

D’oh, that’s what I get for commenting on only a half cup of coffee.

rbj on April 21, 2009 at 8:42 AM

You are surprised that someone who is as deeply invested in failed peasant-politics as Obama is ignorant of the very history that so eloquently refutes it?

To subscribe to the discredited prescriptions of “social justice” requires either a gross misreading or ignorance of history. In this case, most likely both.

mr.blacksheep on April 21, 2009 at 8:44 AM

Getting the month of the Bay of Pigs wrong IS a small mistake, but making everything about himself is immature. As for “everybody loves Barack,” the British press called him on his extreme egocentricity in their critique of one of his speeches. They were far from loving Barack.

Dee2008 on April 21, 2009 at 8:45 AM

I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old. Too often, an opportunity to build a fresh partnership of the Americas has been undermined by stale debates. We’ve all heard these arguments before.”

In other words: “I inherited this mess called America.”

Victim much?

cntrlfrk on April 21, 2009 at 8:45 AM

Q: What is the difference between Chris Burke and Barack Obama?

A: Chris Burke can memorize his lines.

fluffy on April 21, 2009 at 8:45 AM

I am not willing to join in with the birth certificate stuff, but that is partly because I think he should be a natural-born U.S. citizen because his mother was one, and had lived in U.S. states and territories her whole life up to then. The x-years after age y requirement seems like sloppy legislation meant to prevent Grace Kelly’s “royal” children from becoming president, not the son or daughter of a teenage mother. Perhaps this could have been fixed when the law covering John McCain was “clarified,” but Barry likely would not have risked it failing to pass.

Of course it is strange that he could lay his hands on his birth certificate when he wrote his first autobiography — see the last paragraph or two of Chapter 1 of “Dreams From My Father [Who Abandoned Me and Then Proceeded to Screw Half of the Women in Nairobi]” — yet has not produced it.

raybury on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 AM

“I really wanted to talk about housing.”

geckomon on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Oh, to be a fly on the wall at MSNBC or CNN when Barry has these “moments”. Do you think they have even a moment of eye rolling wonderment at the dolt they slurpingly support?

anniekc on April 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM

I don’t known why it would be a surprise that he can’t calculate when he was born relative to the Bay of Pigs incident.

During a campaign event last year, he introduced his wife She-Hulk as the woman he will have been married to 15 years come October… except that they were wed on Oct. 15, 1992 – which would have made it 16 years. Don’t ask me to look it up, I just know I commented on it here because Mrs Capt Scarlet and I were approaching our 15th on the same day and I knew how to do the math (2008 – 1993 for us = 15).

Captain Scarlet on April 21, 2009 at 8:53 AM

Hmmmm…maybe that wasn’t a slip up at all..just saying.

RepubChica on April 21, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Well that holds true for me also. I was not born when slavery was instituted so why should I have to pay retribution or feel guilty for it????

Rick007 on April 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM

Great connection!

Sloan Morganstern on April 21, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Who cares when Obama was born? What does that have to do with the price of sugar in the Western Hemisphere, anyway? And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

Everything is about Obama. Obama is about everything. The United States as we knew it is gone, and it doesn’t matter anymore, now that Obama has apologized for it. This is the dawning of the Age of Obama. Now, get with the program.

Pablo on April 21, 2009 at 8:58 AM

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

I’m not sure Obama believes there is a difference between the two.

MarkTheGreat on April 21, 2009 at 8:59 AM

hint: it’s part of his communications strategy to get a new start on diplomatic relationships and break with the past. the more America is personalized in him, a hugely popular figure, the more difficult for a chavez, castro or morales to demonize us. he’s got an amazing amount of political capital abroad to shield and absorb criticism.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

I think you forgot your /sarc tag.

mr.blacksheep on April 21, 2009 at 8:59 AM

Maybe they taught him some sort of New Math in Indoniesia. Which would also explain why he thinks overtaxing the nation is going to fix the economy.

kingsjester on April 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Very very strange indeed!

The Lefty MSM,was practically on condition red,
that was on stand by Breaking News 24/7-360 days
a year when President Bush made a gaffe or not!

But,for Obama,not a peep,or crickets!!!

canopfor on April 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Dreams From My Father [Who Abandoned Me and Then Proceeded to Screw Half of the Women in Nairobi]”

raybury on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 AM

LOL. I really like that subtitle…

RepubChica on April 21, 2009 at 9:06 AM

The “world” leaders have found their easy mark.

And the MSM are in on it.

Saltysam on April 21, 2009 at 9:08 AM

He used the tactic of making some criticism about him quite a lot in the primary. I think he just is really unable to shift into a different perspective from campaigning.

AnninCA on April 21, 2009 at 9:13 AM

either the President didn’t bother to find out when the botched Bay of Pigs invasion occurred — or forgot his own birthday.

All that matters here is that it wasn’t Obama’s fault. America’s fault? Sure, that’ll do. Kennedys’ fault? OK, fine. Everyone else’s fault who may have been born a little earlier, like say George W Bush? Sound good.

forest on April 21, 2009 at 9:14 AM

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

It’s all personal with him. He can’t make the mental leap of recognizing our country has a past, of good and not so good, from his part in that history.

He did the same thing during the election with Ayres when he argued he couldn’t possibly be held responsible for associating with Ayres when Ayres bombed things when Obama was only 3 years old.

Strange, very strange.

BacaDog on April 21, 2009 at 9:15 AM

maybe because they are interested in important things.

Do you have an example of the “important things”? I’m just curious.

you have to be fox news to immediately look up his birth date and calculate the months (as it happens, the 3 months are correct, just the other way). gotcha!

Thank you for the clarification, fox news.

Who cares when Obama was born?

Well, Obama apparently thought everyone in the room was interested in it. He framed the Bay of Pigs in the context of what he apparently considered a significant enough moment in world history to be relatable to the people.

Personally, I think he was just dropping the hint to Ortega that his birthday’s just right around the corner (or 3 months ago…who can be sure?)

BlueCollarAstronaut on April 21, 2009 at 9:19 AM

Having a president’s staff rather than a candidate’s staff would help. Rahm Emanual and David Astroturfrod know nothing about holding serve on the world stage. Acknowledging the rude remarks and their desire to keep reliving the past rather than move forward in concert as partners in creating solutions would have been a good start.

Wait, that’s his rap on R’s. Why couldn’t he remember that without a teleprompter? Oh, well…

MarkT on April 21, 2009 at 9:21 AM

I’m working on getting a teaching license with endorsements in English and World History. Must I present dates to my students as relative to Obama’s age?

Isn’t it slightly creepy that a person looks at events based on how old he was when they happened? Very imperial of the guy…..

JohnTant on April 21, 2009 at 9:22 AM

I want to know what has happened to the office of the President of the United States and who is this imposter who’s sole purpose is to represent and defend this great nation and its people. Instead, we have an arrogant separatist who kowtow’s to despots, and begs for forgiveness while spitting on the graves of so many Patriots that died for their country defending our sovereignty. If President Obama is so ashamed of our history, (that he fails to even accurately comprehend or embrace), then he should resign from the office he has denigrated to the embarassment of its people.

Rovin on April 21, 2009 at 9:28 AM

It has only been about him.

deidre on April 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Even forgiving the stupid (and easily checkable) mistake on the dates, Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange.

Good catch.

It’s always about him. It’s as if it’s not enough to refer to historical events in terms of whether they occurred B.C. or A.D., we have a new calendar and going forward it’s B.O. and A.O.

Buy Danish on April 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM

i haven’t read where the Europeans love bambi. or the Turks. are you reading other articles suggesting that the Europeans love him?

sometimes.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM

While I agree with the general comment about BO’s performance, I want to point out that it was not him that personalized the criticism. It was reported that in his lecture, Ortega was the one that said Obama could not be held personally responsible for the Bay of Pigs.

OBQuiet on April 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM

Obama – To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old.

It’s not my fault.

I blame America.

Loxodonta on April 21, 2009 at 9:36 AM

I’m grateful that Daniel Tortuga (it means turtle) didn’t blame me for events that happened when I was three months old (I was born Sept. ’61).

jgapinoy on April 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM

I say we give The One the benefit of the doubt here. If he was one month premature, his age from conception would have been 3 months. Of course, I recognize this may be impossible to square with his positions on other issues. But that hasn’t been a factor so far . . . .

EconomicNeocon on April 21, 2009 at 9:43 AM

L’etat c’est moi !

Hubris raging amok.

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 8:18 AM

Ich bin der Staat.

Johan Klaus on April 21, 2009 at 9:44 AM

A concept Obama should learn: “Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

mwdiver on April 21, 2009 at 9:47 AM

And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

This scares me. This guy really thinks like a narcisistic communist tyrant. It’s all about his image and his power not about the people he represents.

shick on April 21, 2009 at 9:52 AM

/ducks

LastRick on April 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM

BANG!

Fetch fido!

shick on April 21, 2009 at 9:53 AM

he works in mysterious ways.

hint: it’s part of his communications strategy to get a new start on diplomatic relationships and break with the past. the more America is personalized in him, a hugely popular figure, the more difficult for a chavez, castro or morales to demonize us. he’s got an amazing amount of political capital abroad to shield and absorb criticism.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

LOL…..thanks for the laughs….ROTFL…..made my morning today. This was the greatest troll parody I have ever read.

Kudos!

DeweyWins on April 21, 2009 at 9:55 AM

Well that holds true for me also. I was not born when slavery was instituted so why should I have to pay retribution or feel guilty for it????

Rick007 on April 21, 2009 at 8:36 AM

Doesn’t matter if your a non-black. You’re still guilty.

Feel the guilt! Pay the retribution! Ahead forward with reverse-racism!

shick on April 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Why wouldn’t he roll out the “things that happened when I was 3 years old” line? He neutralized most media interest in the Bill Ayres relationship with his stupid, “all those events [terrorism] happened when I was 8 years old” jujitsu. Same song, 97th verse.

dhawbake on April 21, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Lay off the talking chimp or there will be retribution.

mr1216 on April 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Obama über alle.

Johan Klaus on April 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Like Rush says,

it’s all about Obama

24×7

and at 120 decibals

notagool on April 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama.

As becki above said:
narcissist
That is all OBama is & he lives it day in & day out.
The lies mean nothing to him. Narcissistic people are dangerous.
But it seems almost half of the voting public thinks narcissism isn’t a problem in the POTUS.
*head reeling*

Badger40 on April 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM

and furthermore, when many children were in American schools learning about Geo. Washington, Thos. Jefferson & other American facts, bambi was in Indonesia learning something completely different.

kelley in virginia on April 21, 2009 at 8:17 AM

In Indonesia, he was learning how evil and racist and unjust and greedy the U.S. is. At the same time, his American mommy was feeding the family with her U.S.-taxpayer-provided welfare checks.

AZCoyote on April 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM

He’s a narcissist. All events in history are related to the time of his birth (regardless of whether or not he can do so correctly — clearly this, like the Selma reference during the campaign, was a case where he did so incorrectly). I’ve never seen anything like this a$$hole in my life.

D2Boston on April 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM

He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama. Who cares when Obama was born?

ed

Yeah, that’s exactly right. Who cares if he meant to say “three months before I was born” or “three months old”.

The story is his very creepy emulation of Bill Clinton’s obsession with making every story about himself, and making up meaningless shit in order to insert himself as the point of reference. With Clinton, it was obvious that he was a congenital liar who couldn’t seem to discern the truth from fantasy.

What is it with this jerkoff?

Jaibones on April 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM

A concept Obama should learn: “Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth switch on the teleprompter and remove all doubt.”

mwdiver on April 21, 2009 at 9:47 AM

Rovin on April 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM

As one British newspaper noted, Obama always personalizes everything. Every sentence ends back with him.

Phoenician on April 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM

When w embarrased our country, cons never said a word.

Remember, politiccs ended at water’s edge?

BS.

getalife on April 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM

This is a serious question to everyone. I am trying to remember all of Bush’s mistakes when it comes to US History. Does anyone remember any? I am not talking about grammar screw-ups, only when he messed up a historical date or fact.

txaggie on April 21, 2009 at 10:45 AM

And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

When you’re a narcissist and the object of a personality cult, that tends to happen.

CP on April 21, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange.


he works in mysterious ways
.

hint: it’s part of his communications strategy to get a new start on diplomatic relationships and break with the past. the more America is personalized in him, a hugely popular figure, the more difficult for a chavez, castro or morales to demonize us. he’s got an amazing amount of political capital abroad to shield and absorb criticism.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM


Nice try
. He represents the whole country; he should defend the country from the inevitable anti-American criticism we always get at these types of meetings.

At heart, I don’t think he loves his county. That’s why he doesn’t bristle at unwarranted criticism of it.

tom on April 21, 2009 at 10:47 AM

raybury on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Not to hi-jack the thread, but Obama’s father was Kenyan/British citizen; therefore, Obama is not natural-born. Mom’s status is irrelevant given dad’s citizenship.

And this assumes he wasn’t born in Kenya.

And this assumes Lolo Soetoro (step-dad) didn’t confer Indonesian citizenship upon him.

And this assumes he did not have an Indonesian passport when he traveled to Pocky-stahn in the early 80s.

And this assumes that his college records do not show Indonesian citizenship (financial aid?).

———————-
back on topic:

Ogabe used this same “I was only x years old” when Ayers was a terrorist…..he is a SOCIOPATH.

ex-Democrat on April 21, 2009 at 10:58 AM

hint: it’s part of his communications strategy to get a new start on diplomatic relationships and break with the past. the more America is personalized in him, a hugely popular figure, the more difficult for a chavez, castro or morales to demonize us. he’s got an amazing amount of political capital abroad to shield and absorb criticism.

sesquipedalian on April 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Thanks for the laughs!

Oh wait…..you were serious? You really believe this stuff?

I’m not sure you are intelligent enough to be posting here.

rockmom on April 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

“To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I’m grateful that President Ortega voters did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old in the Senate. Too often, an opportunity to build a fresh partnership of the with Americas has been undermined by stale debates Republicans. We’ve all heard these arguments before.

Yes we have. In every speech he’s ever given…

Onus on April 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

When w embarrased our country, cons never said a word.

Remember, politiccs ended at water’s edge?

BS.

getalife on April 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Um, do you remember the Boland Amendment? The “Dear Commandante” letter?

The Democrats stopped ending politics at the water’s edge when REAGAN was President! Learn a little history yourself, willya?

rockmom on April 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

This is not an Obamateurism. It is an admission that he is indeed the legislative baby-killer we in the pro-life crowd have correctly accused him of being – that babies in utero, still in the first trimester, are people who just haven’t been born yet.

Wingo on April 21, 2009 at 11:06 AM

When w embarrased our country, cons never said a word.

Remember, politiccs ended at water’s edge?

BS.

getalife on April 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM

And you think this is defending Obama? “Politics ends at the water’s edge” is supposed to mean that when you’re abroad, you’re American, not just a Democrat or a Republican, or a liberal or conservative. Obama here doesn’t react as an American. He doesn’t even rise to the level of partisan Democrat. He shows no loyalty to anyone else but himself. It’s all about him.

tom on April 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Understandable mistake. See, August was when his mother finally brought him to the U.S.

/ducks

LastRick on April 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM

LOL!!! Yup. He was born in January, and all these dates, and history, are messing him up!

I personally think he’s just got more important things to do, like admire himself in the mirror, plan which chef he’s going to fly to D.C. next, for a favorite meal, work on his moobs, and vogue for magazines.

capejasmine on April 21, 2009 at 11:20 AM

He *is* the United States! He won after all, won the whole package. Don’t you forget it!

Neo on April 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM

BHO always represents himself first. Get used to that.

jukin on April 21, 2009 at 11:53 AM

This is why he shouldn’t go to Normandy… and why I’m boycotting July 4. I wasn’t even CLOSE to being born in 1776.

mankai on April 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM

This isn’t the first time he has been confused about his birth. He said that he was conceived at a march that didn’t happen when it would have had to have occurred.

darwin-t on April 21, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Comment pages: 1 2