CIA: We stand behind our actions — and the results

posted at 2:45 pm on April 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

With Barack Obama releasing the OLC memos and branding them as all but criminal and leaving the door open to prosecutions connected to the interrogation of Al-Qaeda terrorists, one might expect the CIA to retreat from its earlier defense of its actions.  So far, though, the agency remains tenacious in insisting that waterboarding Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, and Abu Zubaydah saved American lives.  CNS News reports that the CIA stands by its 2005 memo describing how those interrogations stopped another 9/11-scale attack:

The Central Intelligence Agency told CNSNews.com today that it stands by the assertion made in a May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that the use of “enhanced techniques” of interrogation on al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed (KSM) — including the use of waterboarding — caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.

Before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”

According to the previously classified May 30, 2005 Justice Department memo that was released by President Barack Obama last week, the thwarted attack — which KSM called the “Second Wave”– planned “ ‘to use East Asian operatives to crash a hijacked airliner into’ a building in Los Angeles.”

KSM initially resisted all other interrogation procedures, right up to the waterboard.  He insisted that Americans did not have the necessary resolve to get information out of him, and that we would only know about the next plot when it killed hundreds, if not thousands again.  Only after the waterboard did KSM cough up the information on the “second wave” attacks, and the CIA and other national-security agencies stopped it.

Does this answer whether waterboarding is torture?  Not really.  Does it negate the canard that “torture never works”?  Yes.  Torture works in getting people to talk, and sometimes they tell the truth.  The CIA got what it wanted — the information it needed to save lives — but it doesn’t prove or disprove whether a mock-execution procedure like waterboarding is torture or not.

It does, however, pose a difficult question for Americans, especially since the CIA even under Leon Panetta seems determined to get an answer to it.  What price do we want to pay for a pristine conscience in combating terrorism?  Do you mind if it costs thousands of American lives in plots we can’t discover because a terrorist suspect captured in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, or somewhere else has lawyered up?  Are there times when we can appropriately use a non-lethal technique without letting the target know that it’s non-lethal, in order to save American lives?

Both sides need to quit pretending on this issue.  Mock executions fit the definition of torture, and they also saved a lot of American lives.  If we can admit to reality, then we can have an honest debate about how far we should go to protect ourselves, and what price might be too high for our public image internationally.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM

I had to go shopping with the old lady, does that answer your question?

If she reads this I’m dead meat.

Old Hippie Vet on April 21, 2009 at 5:49 PM

You could go back to your own site and try to jin up a few more comments there. Jealous much? Pitiful.

You mean manipulate the feelings of a large populace to get angry enough to leave incoherent illogical comments? That aren’t based off reason of an education of any sort?

Why would I want to do that?

The only thing pitiful is that fact that A) you and the others on this site believe every word the CIA says, and B) you think that waterboarding is simple one time deal that solves all problems.

Surely waterboarding a person 183 times took a little while. So, the question remains how much time did we save waterboarding a person 183 times compared to other methods.

And please, don’t visit my site anymore.

PresidenToor on April 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM

Does it not worry you that of all your (democratic) allies in the War on Terror not a single one resorted to such tactics?

TrueNorth on April 21, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Honestly, I don’t care what our so-called allies have done or approve of. They are more than willing to let us carry their water, so they can stand back and “tut-tut” with smug superiority.

DrMagnolias on April 21, 2009 at 5:59 PM

Romeo13 on April 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM

If I have to take one for the team so that my children and grandchildren don’t have to live in fear, sign me up. I’ve had a full life and would like to do what it takes to ensure the my posterity do also. I’ll take the high ground so that I have an easier vantage point to obliterate the animals that would see me and mine dead.

thomasaur on April 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM

Ignore the trolls.

It’s the ultimate torture for them.

Not convinced? Try it, and watch them howl and writhe in agony.

Christien on April 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM

The actual result of all the dueling with the leftist trolls leaves one with but a single conclusion. They, as a group, would never agree to anything that might resemble their idea of torture, even if that decision might cost the lives of friends or family.

I would proffer the one instance where I believe the above would not apply. That would be the scenario where it is their life that is directly in jeopardy. I can imagine that, at that time, that anti-torture leftist would be demanding that something, in fact anything, be done, no matter what.

Yoop on April 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM

Thank you, CIA, for keeping us safe. Don’t stop!

Christian Conservative on April 21, 2009 at 6:05 PM

caused KSM to reveal information that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles.

L.A.? really. where they make the L.A. times…….did we really have to stop that particular attack? bet your ass all the f@gs and crazies would have been in line for the election. hmmmm j/k

UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on April 21, 2009 at 6:08 PM

Yoop on April 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM

good point…. but you left out that they would never dirty their hands themselves… they would make someone else do it…

As we have… for generations…

Romeo13 on April 21, 2009 at 6:08 PM

Considering the results, I am amazed that there is even a debate about this. How could our leadership be that weak. Read 2Samuel chapter 4 to see how king David dwelt with enemies of the state.

NeverLiberal on April 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM

I had to go shopping with the old lady, does that answer your question?

If she reads this I’m dead meat.

Old Hippie Vet on April 21, 2009 at 5:49 PM

LMAO…nuff said my brother, been there, done that! I’m glad to see you survived…now go have a double shot of Crown as your well deserved reward for having braved the mall!

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM

now go have a double shot of Crown as your well deserved reward for having braved the mall!

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM

LOL Did that before I posted here. I my be getting old but I ain’t that slow……

….when it comes to 3 fingers of Crown on the rocks………

……….I get real slow when she hands me a Honey Do list though. :-)

Old Hippie Vet on April 21, 2009 at 6:21 PM

I have 2 premises:
1: I want our government to everything they can to extract information from our enemies in order to prevent terrorist attacks.
2: I want the enemies of the United States to tremble in fear at the thought of being captured by us.
Does anybody disagree with those 2 ideas?

redshirt on April 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Gotta love the Left:

Water-boarding = heinous torture, completely immoral

Pulling baby’s head out of mother, sucking brain out with long needle = acceptable alternative to contraception

jazz_piano on April 21, 2009 at 6:23 PM

I would proffer the one instance where I believe the above would not apply. That would be the scenario where it is their life that is directly in jeopardy. I can imagine that, at that time, that anti-torture leftist would be demanding that something, in fact anything, be done, no matter what.

Yoop on April 21, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I couldn’t have said it better. Thank you.

anniekc on April 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM

Water-boarding = heinous torture, completely immoral

Pulling baby’s head out of mother, sucking brain out with long needle = acceptable alternative to contraception

jazz_piano on April 21, 2009 at 6:23 PM

I’d like to hear that explanation as well.

anniekc on April 21, 2009 at 6:26 PM

I have 2 premises:
1: I want our government to everything they can to extract information from our enemies in order to prevent terrorist attacks.
2: I want the enemies of the United States to tremble in fear at the thought of being captured by us.
Does anybody disagree with those 2 ideas?

redshirt on April 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Hell NO.

What these idiots on the Left and some on the Right call torture is a joke, if that’s torture I’m h**g like a horse.

Old Hippie Vet on April 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM

Waterboarding is STILL legal under the Uniforn Code of Military Justice. I’ve been through SERE at Camp MacKall NC and waterboarding is actually mild compared to the rest of SERE.

nelsonknows on April 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM

D@MN Straight it saves lives….

CynicalOptimist on April 21, 2009 at 6:28 PM

LOL Did that before I posted here. I my be getting old but I ain’t that slow……

….when it comes to 3 fingers of Crown on the rocks………

……….I get real slow when she hands me a Honey Do list though. :-)

Old Hippie Vet on April 21, 2009 at 6:21 PM

Glad to hear you’re not slowing down and the 5 years you spent in kindergarten didn’t affect your quick reactions any, unless of course it has to do with the dreaded “honey do” list, then I too would play the slow part to the hilt!

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 6:29 PM

I have 2 premises:
1: I want our government to everything they can to extract information from our enemies in order to prevent terrorist attacks.
2: I want the enemies of the United States to tremble in fear at the thought of being captured by us.
Does anybody disagree with those 2 ideas?

redshirt on April 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM

In past wars, it’s worked to our advantage that enemy soldiers knew they’d be treated well if they surrendered.

But there are going to be circumstances in which harsh interrogation is needed to save lives. And I’m glad I’m not the person who has to decide when/how that will work in practice.

jazz_piano on April 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Would it be an incorrect statement to say that it is only illegal to torture people who themselves recognize that torture is against the law?

redshirt on April 21, 2009 at 6:32 PM

It’s easy to see that leftists just want to attack the Bush Administration. Waterboarding has been conducted, to my knowledge under EVERY president since FDR, if this psuedo-Hitler wants to prosecute anyone in the Bush administration, he’s BETTER start lining up people in his OWN administration who condoned the SAME techniques when they served in the Clinton Administration, including Rohm Emmanuel and Eric Holder.

nelsonknows on April 21, 2009 at 6:33 PM

BY RLEASING THESE MEMOS, OBAMA COMMITTED AN ACT OF TREASON AS HEINOUS AS BENEDICT ARNOLD’S.

reliapundit on April 21, 2009 at 6:33 PM

In past wars, it’s worked to our advantage that enemy soldiers knew they’d be treated well if they surrendered.

But there are going to be circumstances in which harsh interrogation is needed to save lives. And I’m glad I’m not the person who has to decide when/how that will work in practice.

jazz_piano on April 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Point given, but how long ago are we talking? Warfare is a wholly different beast from the days of meeting on the field of honor.
Rules used to be honored by both sides. Not so much anymore.

redshirt on April 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM

good point…. but you left out that they would never dirty their hands themselves… they would make someone else do it…

As we have… for generations…

Romeo13 on April 21, 2009 at 6:08 PM

Sorry I left that out: it’s a given. They need somebody else to blame and prosecute as soon as their a** is safe again.

Yoop on April 21, 2009 at 6:50 PM

This is the fourth thread that GETALIFE and her kind will not answer. Several of us asked what city would you sacrifice in order to get rid of waterboarding but again no answer. Leftists have no answers and yes they are willing for cities in the USA to be destroyed in order to say that waterboarding is torture.

garydt on April 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Proof that torture is getting worse under Obama at Gitmo.

BL@KBIRD on April 21, 2009 at 6:55 PM

Try this….

BL@KBIRD on April 21, 2009 at 6:57 PM

These Chechens ought to know, their Muslims and Muslims seldom fib.

BL@KBIRD on April 21, 2009 at 6:58 PM

If somebody mentioned this in the prior 3 pages of posts I apologize.

I believe Obama, in caving to the far left and reversing himself again, has dug himself a deep hole with a significant problem.

If he allows, or attempts to allow to move forward, the prosecution of attorneys who offered briefs or advice concerning torture to the Bush administration, then his future use of the same avenue is also in jeapordy.

Any attorney offering the Obama administration advice would have to be aware that anything they do might be used as a source of prosecution of themselves by any future administration. That would certainly temper their advice, if not result in absolute refusal to offer anything in controversial areas.

Yoop on April 21, 2009 at 7:04 PM

The only thing pitiful is that fact that A) you and the others on this site believe every word the CIA says,

And please, don’t visit my site anymore.

PresidenToor on April 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM

LOL! Please don’t insult our intelligence. You and your fellow travelers unquestioningly believed a CIA agent when she claimed she had been outed. Only one problem with that, though.

You bottom-dwellers on the Left have always hated the CIA-see Leftist Phillip Agee and company, who outed hundreds of agents. Some of them ended up dead. But you all treated Agee and his komrades as heroes.

Then along comes another CIA agent who claims to have had her ID blown. Suddenly, you get your getalifes all in a bunch, and say that this brave CIA agent has been punished somehow.

Funny thing-if she was covert as she claimed, why wasn’t the guy who “outed” her charged for doing so?

BTW I just checked your site out. Brilliant satire.

Especially the part about firing people the day before they retire. This happened all the time at the elitist private prep school I went to, all of whose teachers voted Democrat.

Tell you what, kid, we’ll stop visiting your site if you stop coming here. Deal?

Del Dolemonte on April 21, 2009 at 7:08 PM

What price do we want to pay for a pristine conscience in combating terrorism?

don’t you mean foreign contigency operations?

DrW on April 21, 2009 at 7:09 PM

Psychologically, I believe that knowing you were being waterboarded by your own side makes a big difference. Unpleasant yes, I’m sure (was it?); but were you to be waterboarded by the other side? Hmmmmm.

Grow Fins on April 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM

Grow-a-brain wins for the moronic comment of the day!

Our enemies don’t water board, they prefer electrocution, breaking bones, and cutting of yer head so your comment is not only moot it’s idiocy!

Again, no comparison…EPIC FAIL!

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 7:16 PM

Liberty or Death on April 21, 2009 at 7:16 PM

Do you mean the terrorist do not follow the Geneva convention?
Say it ain’t so Joe.

Johan Klaus on April 21, 2009 at 7:31 PM

Wow, I’m sorry I left to go to the gym and missed a GrowFins beatdown of epic proportions.

BadgerHawk on April 21, 2009 at 7:36 PM

Is that really the level that conservatism has shrunk to? As a conservative, I certainly hope not. This kind of Nazi-like thinking seems alien to me.

TrueNorth on April 21, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Fair being fair, it is idiot Leftists like you who would recklessly destroy the very protections the Geneva Conventions intended for civilian non-combatants by extending them to those who wage war on civilians and endanger them by hiding among them.

Unlawful combatants deserve no legal quarter.

Sergeant Tim on April 21, 2009 at 7:54 PM

And please, don’t visit my site anymore.

PresidenToor on April 21, 2009 at 5:58 P

No sweat. It only took once to convince me.

hawkdriver on April 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM

Don’t forget, these same jackasses who object to the Bush administration stopping more terror attacks—in the wake of the horror of 9/11, no less—by obtaining intelligence in this manner are the same ones who disgustingly have brayed about Bush being “warned” (another of their disgusting lies) in August 2001 about an attack coming and charging that he ignored the warning.

I have always maintained that had he received a warning he most certainly would have acted and these same vermin would be leading the charge for his impeachment.

They are a disgrace and yes, I’ll say it, getting Republicans, especially Bush, is their priority. They do not care about getting terrorists or information from them. They don’t really care about waterboarding except as a means to attack those they perceive as the real enemy, and to them that isn’t Al Qaeda, it’s us. The DHS memo is another piece of evidence illustrating this ugly and distressing fact.

KittyLowrey on April 21, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Inhumane torture:

Waiting out the remainder of Obama’s term as president.

Daggett on April 21, 2009 at 8:23 PM

With Barack Obama releasing the OLC memos and branding them as all but criminal

What goes around can come around.

What if a future President decides to have his AG go after Obama’s people and maybe even Obama himself for leaving America more open to another 9/11 with policies driven by his moral grandstanding?

Or, coming at it from the “other end” -

What if a future President decides to have his AG go after Obama’s people and maybe even Obama himself for escalating in Afghanistan and getting more American troops killed?

Seems like rather more than a “slipper slope” to make losing an election punishable with prison time.

MB4 on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM

A Brazilian wax would have made KSM talk even faster.

Now what can we do to get Barry Hussein to STFU?

Obama: gelding America day by day.

profitsbeard on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM

MB4 on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM

I’m betting that comrade Obama, follows Comrade CHAVEZ and become EL PRESIDENTE FOR LIFE!!!

viva la revolutione…viva la raza!!!

right4life on April 21, 2009 at 8:45 PM

In past wars, it’s worked to our advantage that enemy soldiers knew they’d be treated well if they surrendered.

But there are going to be circumstances in which harsh interrogation is needed to save lives. And I’m glad I’m not the person who has to decide when/how that will work in practice.

jazz_piano on April 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Enemy SOLDIERS, yes. I haven’t seen any soldiers from al-Qaeda yet. Iraq had some, but they threw down their guns and stopped being soldiers when the American armed forces declared the beginning of combat operations. We let them pick up those guns and slink back into civilian areas to become terrorists. The occupation and reconstruction of Iraq would have gone much more smoothly if we had given them one last chance to surrender honorably, before the operation began… and then done them the honor of letting them die like soldiers, if they still carried Saddam’s flag when we came over the border.

Calling the vermin we’ve battled in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the skies over America on 9/11 “soldiers” is an insult to actual soldiers. Extending them the respect and consideration due to soldiers serving beneath a lawful flag makes a mockery of the honor true soldiers demonstrate to each other in a time of war. It turns the strength of civilization into a weakness, to be exploited. It cheapens the wisdom accumulated through thousands of years of war and peace-making in the West, and scoffs at the price true soldiers paid to acquire that wisdom on the fields of Ia Drang, Pork Chop Hill, Normandy, Verdun, Gettysburg, Agincourt, and hundreds of others.

In the Geneva Conventions, the West strove to express its resolution that war should be fought between professional soldiers beneath the flags of their nations, after every diplomatic alternative has been exhausted. The soldiers of all sides in the conflict deserve respect for their courage and honorable conduct. The lives of civilians are to be spared whenever possible. The rules of war exist to make sure neither side blunders into it unaware, and to keep the immense power of modern weapons from turning military conflict into indiscriminate carnage. True warriors don’t extend respectful and humane treatment to the soldiers of a lawful enemy because they hope this respect and humanity will be reciprocated. They do it because of who they are. They do it because they look across the firing line and see other men like themselves.

None of this applies to lawless barbarians who hide among civilians, target non-combatants deliberately, regard bloodshed as an objective in itself, and prey upon soft targets in their homes, or upon the high seas. We achieve no humanitarian ends by extending elaborate consideration to people who have renounced their own humanity. We spit on the honor of soldiers by treating animals as soldiers. We jeopardize innocent lives by allowing a barbaric enemy to believe that he will be treated like a rowdy hockey player – five for fighting, then back onto the field. We endanger our own civilization by extending its most refined notions of leniency to the enemies, not just of one nation, but of civilization itself… giving them every reason to calculate that the cost of attacking us might be considerably less than catastrophic to them.

We are now engaged in a long war against an enemy we have to defeat before they make each move. There’s no one to negotiate with, no one for Obama to bathe in his celebrated – but so far utterly useless and ineffective – diplomatic skills. There is no one to sign a peace treaty, or make restitution to civilians injured by collateral damage, or take responsibility for orders issued through a lawful chain of command.

I hope the CIA is even more cunning, subtle, and ruthless than liberals accuse it of being. I’ve heard it said that the fanatical murderers of radical Islam might be less eager for bloodshed if the Arab world had ever experienced its own Antietam, Guadalcanal, or Bastogne. If the CIA fails – if the American left makes it fail – the next stage in this conflict might finally bring them that experience. If we can spare the world that fate by throwing wet towels on the faces of a few slimeballs who surrendered their right to live when they entered battle without lawful flags and uniforms, we should do so.

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 PM

Something to think about. How would you like to have a lefty as your backup while you’re in a foxhole. Me either.

mixplix on April 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Are there times when we can appropriately use a non-lethal technique without letting the target know that it’s non-lethal, in order to save American lives?

Thanks to Obama’s release of the memos detailing the techniques, that’s a moot question now. The “targets” (terrorists) all know now that they won’t be seriously hurt.

AZCoyote on April 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

If the CIA fails – if the American left makes it fail – the next stage in this conflict might finally bring them that experience. If we can spare the world that fate by throwing wet towels on the faces of a few slimeballs who surrendered their right to live when they entered battle without lawful flags and uniforms, we should do so.

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 PM

with Obama as president??? not a chance….

and honestly if a blue area gets hit again, I wouldn’t really care..I would not want to go to war…its just those liberal chickens coming home to roost…hell with em…

right4life on April 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

what price might be too high for our public image internationally

.

Hey Ed, ask the families of those killed or injured by terrorists. Do you really care what our international image is because our government chose to protect its citizens?

dmann on April 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Ha! Obama at odds with his own NID:

“High value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qa’ida organization that was attacking this country,” Adm. Dennis C. Blair, the intelligence director, wrote in a memo to his staff last Thursday.

Admiral Blair sent his memo on the same day the administration publicly released secret Bush administration legal memos authorizing the use of interrogation methods that the Obama White House has deemed to be illegal torture. Among other things, the Bush administration memos revealed that two captured Qaeda operatives were subjected to a form of near-drowning known as waterboarding a total of 266 times.

Admiral Blair’s assessment that the interrogation methods did produce important information was deleted from a condensed version of his memo released to the media last Thursday.

Obama is foolish and dangerous.

Weight of Glory on April 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM

Men sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.-Orwell

lizzee on April 21, 2009 at 10:16 PM

Are there times when we can appropriately use a non-lethal technique without letting the target know that it’s non-lethal, in order to save American lives?

Thanks to Obama’s release of the memos detailing the techniques, that’s a moot question now. The “targets” (terrorists) all know now that they won’t be seriously hurt.

AZCoyote on April 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

The target can be told it’s non-lethal, and they still will break. That’s why waterboarding isn’t part of SERE training any more — everyone who underwent it, no matter what their patriotism or resolve, broke to some degree, even when informed completely about the physics of the process.

unclesmrgol on April 21, 2009 at 10:27 PM

water boarding has been used as part of training for military recruits yet it is considered by Obama to be “too cruel” to use on our murderous enemies. Have we all gone crazy?

MaiDee on April 21, 2009 at 10:45 PM

According to the Congress IT’S NOT TORTURE!Somebody better step up and engage these girlie men.

Mojave Mark on April 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 8:49 PM

I’ve never seen it said better.

Cylor on April 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM

water boarding has been used as part of training for military recruits yet it is considered by Obama to be “too cruel” to use on our murderous enemies. Have we all gone crazy?

MaiDee on April 21, 2009 at 10:45 PM

No, our military heroes are potential terrorists and therefore need to be waterboarded to be sure they don’t join up with evil, single issue groups like tea-parties or churches.

Our enemies, or ethically challenged pre-allies as they are now to be called, should never be mistreated. In order to make them like us, we’re going to give each a handjobshake, some DVDs, a lawyer, and a fast-track to US citizenship. What part of this program confuses you;)

Laura in Maryland on April 21, 2009 at 11:33 PM

Well, we didn’t waterboard before 9-11. How did that work out? I thought our high moral standards would protect us? Didn’t work for 9-11, didn’t work for the Cole, didn’t work for the Embassy bombings, etc etc etc. Yeah, guys that cut people’s heads off with a butcher knife on video are going to be really impressed with Obama’s high moral standards. I swear, the sheer stupidity of his position is breathtaking.

gordo on April 21, 2009 at 11:43 PM

The moment that a combatant decides that women and children are valid targets for murder to make a political statement is the moment that they abdicate their rights to be treated like a human being. These are not human beings, they are animals. They will go to any length and commit any atrocity in the name of their cause.

Treating a prisoner in a civil and respectful manner is reserved for true soldiers that do not target civilians purposely.

Hawthorne on April 21, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Hey, I say bring on the “prosecution”. This will mean there will have to be discovery. And I can pretty much garun-damn-tee you Barry doesn’t want that much evidence coming out. He will end up looking more foolish than he already does (if that is even possible)

Fed45 on April 22, 2009 at 12:04 AM

No, they don’t. 183 waterboardings on one guy mean they don’t work at all.

radiofreevillage on April 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM

So, what if only 1 worked? You’d be okay with that? How about 2? 3? 10? 20? So, if we stopped at 182, what do you think would have been the result?

Fed45 on April 22, 2009 at 12:11 AM

HOPEFULLY, I am the only poster that has actually BEEN waterboarded (SERE at Camp Mackall NC). It’s not fun but then again, what they do today IS NOT what was done over 25 years ago when I was in the Army. Today’s “waterboarding is a pale immitation of actual waterboarding which is not more serious that a baptism. Getting your asses in an uproar over giving a terrorist a bath is about as stupid as it gets.

nelsonknows on April 22, 2009 at 12:25 AM

I am so sick of this holier than thou, “we don’t torture people because we are better than that,” or whatever they’re saying, crap. For God’s sake, this waterboarding stuff has gone so far into the ozone that it might as well be a space flight. “Torture,” in my book, leaves marks, scars, broken bones, torn skin, death… get the picture? Dumping a pail of water on some moron with a towel over his face is nothing in comparison to REAL torture. Now, if you want to complain because we tore out the moron’s freshly manicured nails with a pair of pliers, or grabbed his eyeball with a fish hook, I might be inclined to agree. But faking drowning with the ol’ waterboard ( which doubles as a much-needed body cleaning for some of these savages) just isn’t up there with the classics of medieval torture devices.
And don’t even bother mentioning bugs “Ewwww! I’ll tell you anything, just don’t let that ant near me!”
How comical. How absurd. How unhinged can one side of the political spectrum get in their effort to surrender us to all we oppose.

n0doz on April 22, 2009 at 12:31 AM

Water boarding KSM is a non issue.

If the interrogators had simply used soap and water he would have told them where the Limburgh baby was, who was on the Grassy Knoll and the secret ingredient in McDonald’s special sauce.

walkingboss on April 22, 2009 at 12:32 AM

If Obama has people from the Bush administration prosecuted, the next Republican administration needs to prosecute Obama. Let him know that this is a two way street, and if this is really how he wants to go he better be ready to take it right back.

Vegi on April 22, 2009 at 12:33 AM

Thank you, CIA, for keeping us safe. Don’t stop!

Christian Conservative on April 21, 2009 at 6:05

PM

Here here!

No one was permanently damaged by the rough interrogations.
But many lives were saved.
It is as simple as that.

We are right not to get into the slippery slope that could happen without self-examination but at this point we are soooooo far from that.

I support what the CIA has done, and my conscience is clear.

petunia on April 22, 2009 at 12:39 AM

The moment that a combatant decides that women and children are valid targets for murder to make a political statement is the moment that they abdicate their rights to be treated like a human being. These are not human beings, they are animals. They will go to any length and commit any atrocity in the name of their cause.

Treating a prisoner in a civil and respectful manner is reserved for true soldiers that do not target civilians purposely.

Hawthorne on April 21, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Yeah I think this is in the same league as PETA protests at this point.

petunia on April 22, 2009 at 12:43 AM

Both sides need to quit pretending on this issue

Speak for yourself, white man.

Terrorists have, and deserve, no rights. Anything we do to them that gets information to stop terrorist attacks is acceptable.

When we capture a terrorist, we should give him a quick trial in military court, and sentence him to death. Then we should give him a chance to tell us everything he knows. If he declines, he should be drugged / tortured / questioned in whatever way we think will work best until we think he’s been drained dry. Then he should be executed.

If our enemies stop murdering prisoners, we can revist this treatment. But so long as they act outside of the rules, none of the rules should protect them.

Greg Q on April 22, 2009 at 2:51 AM

You can’t argue with success… and waterboarding a single suspect 180+ times speaks for its efficacy.

benny shakar on April 22, 2009 at 3:01 AM

If Obama thinks getting the truth out is so important, why not release his birth certificate?

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on April 22, 2009 at 3:12 AM

we should have beheaded KSM.

lavell12 on April 22, 2009 at 3:20 AM

I saw a link at Instapundit to a Fred Thompson audio calling on members of Congress to tell what they knew about interrogations, under oath. Let them go on the record.. and that includes Nancy Pelosi.

Terrye on April 22, 2009 at 6:59 AM

benny:

The guy is still flapping his gums about what a fine thing he did helping to kill all those people and how he would be happy to kill some more, so it does not seem that the technique exactly broke him.

But then you don’t care about saving lives, you are too busy playing partisan politics for that.

Terrye on April 22, 2009 at 7:01 AM

Seems like rather more than a “slippery slope” to make losing an election punishable with prison time.

MB4 on April 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM

Quote of the Month.

hillbillyjim on April 22, 2009 at 7:41 AM

I believe it was Mr. Spock who once said: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”

Which is worse? The torture of two or three evil men, or the death of hundreds or thousands of innocent people?

The answer is ssooo obvious you either have to be mentally impaired, morally stupid, or a blatant liar to not state the obvious.

Daddy-O on April 22, 2009 at 7:44 AM

Imagine if the Bush administration hadn’t done anything to KSM and he hadn’t revealed vital info about an attack. Imagine if, instead, a jumbo jet had been flown into the Library Tower or the Bonaventure Hotel in downtown Los Angeles… these same folks who want to put the Bush administration on trial for torture would have been calling for impeachment and trials for incompetence, dereliction of duty or failing to defend this country. It was a lose-lose situation politically… The option was to sacrifice thousands of Americans for the comfort of one admitted terrorist. Doesn’t sound like a hard choice for me.

If only these same people would afford the same protections to innocent, unborn children as they want to extend to admitted murderers and terrorists.

Texas Rainmaker on April 22, 2009 at 8:18 AM

You can’t argue with success… and waterboarding a single suspect 180+ times speaks for its efficacy.

benny shakar on April 22, 2009 at 3:01 AM

That straw pony has already been put out to pasture.

I’m glad you agree that stopping a planned attack is most definitely “success”.

hillbillyjim on April 22, 2009 at 8:22 AM

I believe it was Mr. Spock who once said: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.”

Which is worse? The torture of two or three evil men, or the death of hundreds or thousands of innocent people?

The answer is ssooo obvious you either have to be mentally impaired, morally stupid, or a blatant liar to not state the obvious.

Daddy-O on April 22, 2009 at 7:44 AM

Or a liberal, which is of course a rather redundant way of saying mentally impaired, morally stupid, and a blatant liar.

doriangrey on April 22, 2009 at 8:26 AM

Imagine how different the Election would have been had we waterboarded Obama about his REAL plans to sabotage America.

marklmail on April 22, 2009 at 8:37 AM

It will be interesting to follow (from what actually gets news coverage) the DNC/CIA/GOP relations.

The CIA of the Plame/Wilson fiasco set to destroy Bush’s presidency is the same CIA under fire and hiding under the GOP for cover.

Purist nonpartisan CIA, “I have a dream.”

AS IF.

maverick muse on April 22, 2009 at 8:37 AM

Imagine how different the Election would have been had we waterboarded Obama about his REAL plans to sabotage America.

marklmail on April 22, 2009 at 8:37 AM

The new POTUS CANDIDATE Litmus test: pass water boarding exam. Perverted liars or not, the results would leave tough muthaf8ckers in office, no pantywaist losers./snark

If Obama is an equal opportunity POTUS, let him apologize for HIS own weaknesses BEFORE ever presuming to apologize for OUR nation’s.

maverick muse on April 22, 2009 at 8:46 AM

“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater, the Left’s favorite conservative.

Mr. Grump on April 22, 2009 at 8:53 AM

If only these same people would afford the same protections to innocent, unborn children as they want to extend to admitted murderers and terrorists.

Texas Rainmaker on April 22, 2009 at 8:18 AM

It stands to reason that Obama’s presidency will blame every terrorist attack on their typical white American conservatives. The fabrication of “evidence” is being woven. Obama set those Federal illegal and unconstitutional wheels spinning and ploughing full speed ahead upon his inauguration. We were given the “seeding” analogy from Axelrod.

maverick muse on April 22, 2009 at 8:54 AM

i don’t get it: why do we write down or record everything? actually, i’m sure we don’t, but why are these memos even in existence except to say that KSM said such & such under “consistent” pressure.

and i hope our soldiers & CIA & special ops people all over the world are NOT keeping memos. that would be stupid.

kelley in virginia on April 22, 2009 at 8:55 AM

i love barry goldwater. he & john wayne–ooooh!

kelley in virginia on April 22, 2009 at 8:56 AM

“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater, the Left’s favorite conservative.

Mr. Grump on April 22, 2009 at 8:53 AM

Just so long as the blade cuts both ways, not for a one-sided argument, reaching the truth of the matter. Goldwater was fighting Socialism aka Communists, domestic and foreign. Those were the days of doves and hawks in journalism. The SDS own today’s media, academia and presidency. The irony of Patty Hearst has made a satire of our national intellect. Our MSM promotes the radicalization of our existence. Pay off for release; Manchurian media.

maverick muse on April 22, 2009 at 9:06 AM

kelley in virginia on April 22, 2009 at 8:56 AM

John Wayne for President

btw, I visited AZ’s new GOP senator website, SIMCOX, linked from JustOneMinute. Very thorough and impressive.

maverick muse on April 22, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Liberals are abject cowards

Bevan on April 22, 2009 at 9:16 AM

I say Waterboard…Waterboard…Waterboard!!! I remember that cool,sunny,crisp fall morning when frankly my life changed. The sheer terror that I felt on 9/11 is still in my memory. I know that the majority of our country has forgotten(just like Bush said it would) that they killed 3,000 americans on our soil. Waterboarding is torture? I say torture is being crushed to death my falling debris,burned alive by jet fuel, knowing that you can’t get out of the towers and you are going to surely die would qualify as torture….

sweet92169 on April 22, 2009 at 9:31 AM

I’m glad to see that the CIA isn’t playing the doormat on this, and Cheney is actually managing to help them. He has gotten the entire story out there for discussion. Now, Obama looks downright mean for leaving out the part about how the techniques worked.

AnninCA on April 22, 2009 at 9:41 AM

Again what would the leftists here do to extract information if they would not use waterboarding. Is the question too difficult?

garydt on April 22, 2009 at 9:55 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5