Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: Perez Hilton at the Miss USA contest?

posted at 1:35 pm on April 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Mix an almost-anachronistic beauty contest with an outspoken gay liberal blogger, and you get … a classically awkward moment. I’ve gotten a lot of e-mail about Miss California’s response to Perez Hilton about her stance on gay marriage, all of it cheering her defense of traditional values:

According to the person who clipped and uploaded the video, Miss California got booed, but if so, not by many. Perez himself shakes his head in annoyance, but what did he expect? These beauty contests are celebrations of kitschy Americana — of bathing suits and evening gowns, of “world peace” and apple pie.

In fact, one has to wonder why the organizers invited Perez to be a judge at all. Surely Perez’ readership doesn’t represent their core audience, and his celebrity-dish-loving readers could care less about Gracie Lou from North Dakota anyway. It’s a very strange choice. And Perez proves it by calling Miss California a “dumb b****” for not agreeing with him:

Stay classy, Perez. And I think you need something much stronger than a cocktail. (Thanks to my co-blogger Allahpundit for the second vid)


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9

Scott H on April 20, 2009 at 9:14 PM

Very interesting take on this.

JetBoy on April 20, 2009 at 9:43 PM

I’m willing to entertain the possibility that polygamy is not a horrible thing… I’m not there yet, but who knows?… but I dispute the assertion made by some that broadening marriage to include one man and another man (or one woman and another woman) does not open the door for other arrangements.

Y-not on April 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM

It depends how its done. If it is done by the legislature it probably doesn’t. If the courts to it, it might depending on how the arrive at their decision.

My guess is that SCOTUS will let the states define marriage and work on the “full faith and credit” questions raised by DOMA.

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM

And here you see depicted in its natural habitat the Common Angry Gay. Keep your distance folks, he bites!

BKennedy on April 20, 2009 at 9:47 PM

Phew!

I just watched the Perez Hilton video. No wonder gays get a bad rap.

Miss California gave her honest opinion in a respectful manner.

I find the self righteous bluster spouting from that man’s mouth quite queer, indeed.

Saltysam on April 20, 2009 at 9:51 PM

From what I’ve seen there are two kinds of gays. The quiet unassuming type who may or may not be active in their movement, march, organize, whatever but are palatable and make me at least more willing to hear what they have to say.

Then there’s these militant flamers. A never-ending freak show of hyperbole and misplaced rage. And they are louder, and can show more rage than anybody. Therefore, they get their way.

Dr. ZhivBlago on April 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM

I sure hope the sponsors and advertisers of this event are happy………..

……… didn’t watch it, and I’m not going to buy their products for putting up with this crap!

Seven Percent Solution on April 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Are the mean trolls gone yet?

Kjeil on April 20, 2009 at 9:37 PM

They’re are always mean trolls. And then there are others who might be allies on one or many subjects, but disagrees with what you’ve just posted, and blasts you for it. And there are the crazy posters. And then those who simply are in a bad mood at the moment, or make a failed attempt at humor that causes hurt unintentionally. I suppose the best thing is to think carefully before posting what your words might mean to others.

You never can tell when you send a word,
Like an arrow shot from a bow
By an archer blind, be it cruel or kind,
Just where it may chance to go.
It may pierce the breast of your dearest friend.
Tipped with its poison or balm,
To a stranger’s heart in life’s great mart,
It may carry its pain or its calm.

You never can tell when you do an act
Just what the result will be;
But with every deed you are sowing a seed,
Though the harvest you may not see.
Each kindly act is an acorn dropped
In God’s productive soil.
You may not know, but the tree shall grow,
With shelter for those who toil.

You never can tell what your thoughts will do,
In bringing you hate or love;
For thoughts are things, and their airy wings
Are swifter than carrier doves.
They follow the law of the universe –
Each thing must create its kind,
And they speed o’er the track to bring you back
Whatever went out from your mind.

– Ella Wheeler Wilcox

Of course, I’ve not taken enough care myself, and more than once. And when I notice this, I try to make amends, but sometimes one is never again trusted. After all, nearly all of us are anonymous, so how do we know one another’s true intent, true character? That’s why I sometimes ask others questions.

So, post post what you believe, and either ignore or debate or thank those who respond. Just try to remember the power that words have to inform, confuse, hide, demean, incite, comfort and inspire.

Be not afraid!

– Pope John Paul II

Loxodonta on April 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM

Having a gay male as a judge on a female beauty pageant is as idiotic as having a vegan judging a chili con carne contest.

What will the uber-P.C. morons decree next?

Deaf judges for a battle of the bands?

Blind judges for painting exhibitions?

Trump is a daft doofus.

profitsbeard on April 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM

When I perform my function as Brief Judge in moot court competitions, the rules admonish the judges to not grade the briefs according to which side he / she believes ought to win the hypothetical case being addressed. Instead, briefs are graded according to how well the writers present their sides of the case, regardless of which side it is.

Why couldn’t the pageant here have applied a similar rule of fairness? The organizers should damn well have known that the FREAK who asked this question had a personal stake in the answer’s substance and was going to hold it against the contestant if the answer didn’t come out in his favor! There should have been a pre-screening process to prevent this from happening. Shame on the pageant for allowing any of this to occur.

Miss California sure seems like the perfect woman to me, both inside and out.

OneVision on April 20, 2009 at 10:14 PM

OneVision at 10:14 PM-

Miss California sure seems like the perfect woman to me, both inside and out.

+100!

profitsbeard on April 20, 2009 at 10:16 PM

What will the uber-P.C. morons decree next?

Deaf judges for a battle of the bands?

Blind judges for painting exhibitions?

profitsbeard on April 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM

Are you claiming that the judges of contemporary music and art can actually hear and see?

Really?

Loxodonta on April 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Miss California is ridiculously hot…

therightwinger on April 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Scott H on April 20, 2009 at 9:14 PM

Life is difficult. We each have our burdens and struggles, and have to live with the choices we’ve made or neglected to make.

Peace be with you.

Loxodonta on April 20, 2009 at 10:23 PM

Hahaha! That’s funny. MadisonConservative, who actually puts “conservative” into his userID and then consistently spends most of his time arguing AGAINST conservatives on this very blog … accuses me of being a liberal troll.

Gregor on April 20, 2009 at 9:35 PM

Well, let’s see. This is a conservative blog, filled with conservatives, with probably less than 1% of posters being liberals.

If you get into a debate with other posters, I’m going to assume that even an empty-headed dingbat like you can do the math as to whether that person is going to be a conservative.

However, real conservatives don’t sling around slurs because they think it increases their e-peen.

MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Seven Percent Solution on April 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM

O/T But really hope you’ve seen these:

Iranian Wookies!

Loxodonta on April 20, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Perez is just pissed that more men find Miss California sharp and attractive then find him to be.

When liberals like Perez start calling Obama,Hillary,and Joe Biden bigots and Bitc#s for being against gay marriage,start anti-gay protesting at Mosques and predominantly black church’s,and end their selective moral outrage based on political affiliation,then they may start gaining some credibility on this issue.

Baxter Greene on April 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM

It is all well and good she stood up for her values, but she is in a BEAUTY CONTEST. Values? Just answer the question like a politician if you want to win. She knew what the judges wanted to hear and didn’t respond that way. So she lost.

I guess now we know what a liberal’s concept of an ideal woman is: One that will keep her personal beliefs to herself and that will parrot whatever trendy progressive ideas a liberal guy gives her. I can’t see any other interpretation for the judges’ decision.

Socratease on April 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM

Perez is just pissed that more men find Miss California sharp and attractive then find him to be.

When liberals like Perez start calling Obama,Hillary,and Joe Biden bigots and Bitc#s for being against gay marriage,start anti-gay protesting at Mosques and predominantly black church’s,and end their selective moral outrage based on political affiliation,then they may start gaining some credibility on this issue.

Baxter Greene on April 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM

Yeah It’s high time we see the gheys march on Harlem.

Here is another thing Gheys haven’t considered. When Obama gives the illegals their amnesty they are going to turn right around and start voting against ghey rights at about a 60% clip. If the prop 8 break down in California is any kind of an indicator. If Illegals get amnesty this year or next Gay marriage is going to stay dead in California for a long time.

Kjeil on April 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM

OneVision at 10:14 PM-

Am I to guess correctly that you are a fellow Queen fan?

Freddy Mercury, you left us way too soon:(

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 20, 2009 at 11:00 PM

Perez is just pissed that more men find Miss California sharp and attractive then find him to be.

When liberals like Perez start calling Obama,Hillary,and Joe Biden bigots and Bitc#s for being against gay marriage,start anti-gay protesting at Mosques and predominantly black church’s,and end their selective moral outrage based on political affiliation,then they may start gaining some credibility on this issue.

Baxter Greene on April 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM

This needs to be Quote of the Day!!!

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 20, 2009 at 11:02 PM

If Illegals get amnesty this year or next Gay marriage is going to stay dead in California for a long time.

Kjeil on April 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM

Wouldn’t it take some time for them to qualify to vote?

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 11:14 PM

What I want to know is if Hilton’s vote made a difference in whether she won or not…

If so? They really need to make some amends for this.

Romeo13 on April 20, 2009 at 11:18 PM

Perez Hilton is a pathetic famewhore. I gave up his blog long ago for the far more illustrious dListed.

His politics twist in the wind to whatever gains him more popularity. He was an early supporter of Hillary (as most Latinos were/are), but then as his readers O-Bombed him, he became all for Obama.

He’s a worthless troll and famewhore, and does not speak for the gay community. Even I, a gay man, hates him, and most gays I know now find him irrelevant and ridiculous.

Please consume his “words” with a salt-block. All I’m sayin’.

lansing quaker on April 20, 2009 at 11:19 PM

Wouldn’t it take some time for them to qualify to vote?

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 11:14 PM

Not in most democratic states.
By the way, I did email Trump. Not that it will do any good, but I had some time….

Bambi on April 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM

By the way, I did email Trump. Not that it will do any good, but I had some time….

Bambi on April 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM

In some cases the path to citizenship would be instant? I thought in most proposals they went to the back of the line.

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 11:34 PM

By the way, I did email Trump. Not that it will do any good, but I had some time….

Bambi on April 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM

I don’t know that Trump reads all his email, but I’m sure the assistant he has for that is in her 20’s and hot.

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM

I don’t know what gay marriage has to do with the Miss America Contest. But I believe this. Miss California might as well look for a new home in another state because some gays in California are vile and will make her life miserable. Just ask anyone who voted for prop 8 and was outed. Jobs lost and businesses shutdown. The Miss America Pageant sure took the PC way out too. What a shock! Miss California will now learn who her true friends are.

Bluehanky on April 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM

Funny. 52% of Californians agree with Miss Cali, and her position is seen as a minority viewpoint? Elton John, Barack Obama, the Pope, and any imam support her stance on the issue. In Hispanic California, would Perez Hilton’s position be the popular one?

No. Prejean is only taking it on the chin because we’re the “silent majority”. The loud, whining minority runs things in entertainment and politics. It’s funny how liberals defend the right to “controversial” positions, then savage people who speak the majority opinion. I suspect that it takes that sort of immediate brutal response to maintain their grip on the microphone. Imagine what would happen if everyday people actually questioned things? Why, you’d have protests in the street! But that was last week.

I predict that Miss California will do just fine, despite the left-wing criticism. Because the people that buy most of the books, the folks who buy most of the movie tickets, and the people who spend most of the money at the mall have more in common with her than with Perez Hilton.

hawksruleva on April 20, 2009 at 11:50 PM

Hmm…I am not sure if anyone said this, but wouldn’t there have been some sort of rule against judges engaging in this sort of behavior? It’s one thing to ask her the question, but quite another to visually disapprove of her answer live and then to subsequently run backstage to vlog, call her a bitch, and actually display your judging bias. I think that this tarnishes the entire contest and/or any proclamations of objectivity. Given that he couldn’t even recall who won, it would appear to me that we have a bit of a saboteur on our hands who had a political agenda going into this. Since when did the Miss America pageant descend into an exercise of self-aggrandizement by a “judge”?

Levinite on April 20, 2009 at 11:57 PM

All I know is that I would rather spend time with a beautiful woman like Miss California than with a sad, creepy little celebrity stalker and rumor monger like Perez Hilton.

Dreadnought223 on April 20, 2009 at 11:58 PM

Is it sad that the moment she said that was when I knew she wouldn’t win? I also thought she’d finish last, not as runner-up though.

I was also not surprised to see that the woman who won was the one who said our tax dollars should not go to bail out bank/corporations, but should go to welfare, education and healthcare.

So in the end it felt like conservative vs. liberal and liberal won.

Where do I go now to gain religious freedom?

ConDem on April 21, 2009 at 12:07 AM

Dollayo on April 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM

Sarah Palin, at the debate with Biden, said she didn’t know what caused people to become gay. I take the same position. Until scientists beyond the shadow of a doubt say there is a ‘gay gene’ one has to conclude there may be multiple factors that determine how one relates to his own gender or the opposite gender.

I guess what I am saying is that however a gay person comes to his or her decision to purport himself or herself as being gay I can accept that because I live by the Belichick principle of “It is what it is.”

I have no problem with somebody being gay. But I do have a huge problem with the gay community perpetrating an unsubstantiated claim that is meant to influence the judiciary on the issue of gay marriage.

As far as I’m concerned if the gay community is able to lobby legislators and the governor of a particular state to pass gay marriage so be it. But to lobby the judiciary based on a false premise of gays being born that way is completely disingenuous and to convince activist judges to impose gay marriage arbitrarily on a community or state based on this false premise is outrageous to the nth degree.

technopeasant on April 21, 2009 at 12:13 AM

Why is a gay man a judge in a beauty contest for women?

I would have been more comfortable seeing the gay man replaced with a lesbian.

Who thought of that train wreck?

Sapwolf on April 21, 2009 at 12:15 AM

Oh, and yes, she lost because of that answer. Conservatives don’t win beauty contests with gay judges.

Sapwolf on April 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM

Doesn’t matter in the end. In the eternal economy, she’s a winner. God has seen this.

newton on April 21, 2009 at 12:18 AM

Kjeil on April 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM

I think that is a valid point.But this issue has been taken from the voice of the people and decided in the courtroom’s around the country so I am not sure how much voting block majorities really matter now.

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 20, 2009 at 11:02 PM

This selective outrage from liberals on gay marriage is similar to watching NOW stand there supporting Clinton who cheated on his wife for years and now frame the issue as Hillary being “smart and strong” for standing by him.
Similar to liberals calling themselves “anti-war” and then supporting candidates who vote (Kerry/Edwards) and carry out the actions of war (Clinton,Obama).
Similar to liberals yelling and screaming torture by keeping terrorist up to late and putting caterpillars in their cells with them while they fight with all they have to strengthen the policies of ripping children limb from limb
from a woman’s womb.

Similar to liberals crying about the abuses of bigoted,hateful rhetoric and actions towards them for having a different lifestyle or political stance and then treating
people that they disagree with like this:

Perez Hilton, P.D.S. sufferer
By Michelle Malkin • September 10, 2008 03:47 PM
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/10/perez-hilton-pds-sufferer/?print=1

Posted on the blog of left-wing celebrity gossip blogger, Perez Hilton:

Mrs. California is not the first smart,strong,and successful woman that Perez has shown his version of liberal
“tolerance and love” towards.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 12:31 AM

Please consume his “words” with a salt-block. All I’m sayin’.

lansing quaker on April 20, 2009 at 11:19 PM

LQ, I read your posts from time to time and can find them compelling. What you said though about Perez Hilton is a big hard to take with any amount of salt considering the overall lack of policing from the Gay Community. No offense, but they have to really go overboard before anyone even notices. Instead of us having to take them with a grain of salt, how about you guys kick the snot out of them. Figuratively, of course.

hawkdriver on April 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM

I was also not surprised to see that the woman who won was the one who said our tax dollars should not go to bail out bank/corporations, but should go to welfare, education and healthcare.

ConDem on April 21, 2009 at 12:07 AM

UHHHHH…….without banks,corporations,and the EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEvil wealthy,there would be very little tax money to fund welfare,education,and health care.

You are probably right about this being a liberal winning answer.
All about feel good emotions and totally lacking in reality supported by facts.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 12:37 AM

I’m willing to entertain the possibility that polygamy is not a horrible thing… I’m not there yet, but who knows?… but I dispute the assertion made by some that broadening marriage to include one man and another man (or one woman and another woman) does not open the door for other arrangements.

Y-not on April 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM

It depends how its done. If it is done by the legislature it probably doesn’t. If the courts to it, it might depending on how the arrive at their decision.

My guess is that SCOTUS will let the states define marriage and work on the “full faith and credit” questions raised by DOMA.

dedalus on April 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM

The most predictable social effect of legalized polygamy is further limiting the romantic possibilities for lower income young men, as the most wealth and powerful men draw an ever larger portion of marriageable females out of the population. It also reduces the number of children born into a polygamous generation, as only the wealthiest polygamous men will be able to afford children with all of their wives – especially in a consumerist, high-tech society where even affluent married couples frequently put off having children. If lower-income polygamous families decide to have lots of children anyway – a preference that tends to be encouraged by religions that endorse polygamy – the strain on social welfare services will be enormous. Daily demonstrations of the effect large numbers of impoverished, sexually frustrated young men have on a culture are held in the Middle East.

I think some of the anger in the growing backlash against the gay marriage movement comes from a mainstream American culture that is tired of having to defend itself against attacks from all directions. For the better part of fifty years, middle America has been besieged by a political culture that can’t wait to hand a microphone to every one of its critics. Political liberals, proud to imagine themselves as Citizens Of The World, are eager to let the American peasantry know just how much The World disapproves of them. Socialists with schemes to sell inflate every real and imaginary problem into a crisis, and inform Ma and Pa America that it’s all they’re fault, so they’re obligated to pay for it. Actors and musicians work to establish their artistic credibility and “edge” by thinking up clever new insults they can sell to studios, which repackage them and sell them at a markup to the targets of the insults, assuring them that objections to the content of these purchases would be boorish.

If you’re in your thirties now, you’ve spent every day of your life being told how terribly wrong your parents and grandparents were about everything, except for fighting the Nazis. Every day you went to school, you were taught about America’s history of crimes and oppression, followed by incredibly ham-fisted lectures in how the American way of life is destroying the planet, and topped off with the suggestion that your parents were wrong not to get you started on the basics of sexual intercourse when you were seven years old. You couldn’t make it through an evening of television without being told your traditions were ignorant and repressive.

Nothing anyone did, outside of the government when the right political party was in power, ever made any of these critics ease up. As soon as the environmentalists stopped complaining about disappearing rainforests, the polar ice caps started melting. America could never stop being a racist nation, with increasingly intrusive and lavishly funded “diversity” programs necessary just to contain the radioactive poison boiling in its heart. Middle America’s men were also sexists, almost without exception. If you’re thirty-something now, your twenties were filled with wall-to-wall news coverage of sexual harassment in the male-dominated corporate and military culture… stories which abruptly vanished in 1998, for some reason.

You also spent your twenties being told you didn’t care enough. You were blind to African famine, insufficiently angry about apartheid, cruelly insensitive to the plight of the homeless, and selfishly unwilling to pay your “fair share” of taxes. You needed your “awareness” raised about a long list of things, and an army of media-savvy activists was eager to invade your headspace and get to work. You even conjured a deadly disease, AIDS, into existence with your callous insensitivity. In the Nineties, you were told this disease could explode into a universal epidemic at any moment, but you were not allowed to ask any questions about how it spread, or how it might be quarantined. It could only be cured through pure, concentrated caring, and every day it wasn’t cured stood as an icy rebuke to your shriveled heart.

After a lifetime of being assaulted from every side, and told how benighted and ignorant they are about everything, I think middle America wants to have a few aspects of their lives that aren’t subject to constant deconstruction. There are a few things they’re just sick and tired of having to fight over every day… a few words in our common language that don’t have to be defined through legal battles. There are some ideas they feel entitled to cherish, without having to man the ramparts to protect them from an unending siege. One of those things, perhaps the principal among those ideas, is marriage.

The average mom and pop in flyover country don’t think they belong on trial, answering hostile questions about what marriage is and isn’t, from a prosecution that will never stop bringing up fresh charges. Most of all, they resent the assertion that they are not allowed to express their love for their hallowed traditions without being accused of hating someone else. They reject the notion that they cannot elevate traditional marriages without denigrating alternative lifestyles, or that tolerance is invalid without approval, and eventually submission. They aren’t much interested in persecuting homosexuals – they’d rather not think about what they do at all – but they’re increasingly angry at the suggestion that honoring and revering marriage between men and women somehow insults everyone who refuses to join them.

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM

She says God was testing her faith, what a classy lady. I wish I could meet somebody like that.

Vegi on April 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM

Am I to guess correctly that you are a fellow Queen fan?

Freddy Mercury, you left us way too soon:(

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 20, 2009 at 11:00 PM

Correctamundo! In the current context, though, I must stress that the Queen I like is the band, period (before Freddie started to dress in drag in videos).

Freddie had his tendencies, but the man could rock and had the single greatest voice in rock history. He did indeed leave us way too soon, and the music world suffers without him. His voice and Brian May’s riffs together can never be duplicated.

Yes, my call name is derived from one of Queen’s greatest hits and reflects my dream, a vision, that all who seek to preserve our country’s bedrock principles will rise up together and speak with one voice, and move together as one flesh, one bone, to achieve one goal. Now, that goal is to defeat socialism and restore America’s greatness. In the wake of the 800+ Tea Parties, dare I say that my dream could be one little step closer to reality?

I bid a good morning to you all. It’s Morning in America all over again.

OneVision on April 21, 2009 at 1:10 AM

I guess Trump got what he wanted – people are talking about the Miss America pageant the day after. When was the last time that happened?

Candy Slice on April 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM

It’s not Miss America–it’s Miss USA. That’s not semantics but a very real difference. For one, Miss USA is on network TV unlike Miss America, and clearly has more emphasis on looks (which is why people like me tune in to one and not the other).

Patriot33 on April 21, 2009 at 1:45 AM

(before Freddie started to dress in drag in videos).

Freddie had his tendencies, but the man could rock and had the single greatest voice in rock history. OneVision on April 21, 2009 at 1:10 AM

Dude, Freddie was flamed out in drag way back when he was doing Bohemian Rapsody….there was no doubt about the dude way back then. When he dressed in drag with his moustache for “I want to be free” dude was already way out of the closet. I dont think he ever looked as gay as he did for bohemian rapsody.

The band was very good but they were the type of band that had one or two good songs per album.

Not exactly in the same class as Beatles, AC/DC, or 70’s era Floyd.

The Wall on April 21, 2009 at 1:46 AM

Not exactly in the same class as Beatles, AC/DC, or 70’s era Floyd.

The Wall on April 21, 2009 at 1:46 AM

Beatles and AC/DC were great but personally Floyd is in a class by themselves.

I am going to have to add Zeppelin,Sabbath,and the Doors to your list of ground breaking top shelf rock.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 3:10 AM

Same sex or opposite marrage

That is the QOTD!

Kini on April 21, 2009 at 3:21 AM

However, real conservatives don’t sling around slurs because they think it increases their e-peen.

MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM

Not to belabor the point here, but you did call Garafalo a bull dyke the other day. FYI.

Tacitus_SGL on April 21, 2009 at 3:49 AM

Perez Hilton cares more about self-promotion than gay rights. It’s ironic how outraged Perez is over Miss California’s views yet he never spoke out against Obama’s stance on gay marriage and used his blog to encourage voting for Obama . Miss California is an easy target whereas criticizing Obama would cost Perez his Hollywood liberal club card.

Christina_M on April 21, 2009 at 5:12 AM

OneVision on April 21, 2009 at 1:10 AM

Cheers to you:)

The band was very good but they were the type of band that had one or two good songs per album.

That’s a negative there, shipmate. Of course, Queen was a band that was all over the place in terms of their style. No two songs sound alike.

BTW, anyone else here agree with me that “Don’t Stop Me Now” is the worlds greatest song to drive to?

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 21, 2009 at 6:41 AM

She says God was testing her faith, what a classy lady. I wish I could meet somebody like that.

Vegi on April 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM

You wouldn’t know what to do with that.

/just kidding :)

She is hot. Hasn’t been brainwashed by Hollywood yet.

Daemonocracy on April 21, 2009 at 7:08 AM

Maybe Perez Hilton and the rest of his ilk will get it one day. 99% of the world is straight and doesn’t think about queers all day long. Gay Marriage is an attempt at being looked at as normal. You’re gay, you’ll never be normal. The girl gave her opinion which 99% of people concur with her on. Hilton needs to go back into the closet and don’t let the door hit ya in the ass. Then again, he might enjoy the doorknob……

adamsmith on April 21, 2009 at 7:12 AM

Miss California is a very beautiful woman. She handled the question truthfully and with a traditional moral view that reflects so well on her. Afterward, she spoke of her religious faith. Life is good when we witness such a lovely woman.

Perez Hilton represents meanness, spitefulness and ugliness.

Phil Byler on April 21, 2009 at 7:16 AM

BTW, anyone else here agree with me that “Don’t Stop Me Now” is the worlds greatest song to drive to?
DethMetalCookieMonst on April 21, 2009 at 6:41 AM

I am going to have to go with Steely Dan’s “Do it Again”.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM

The semen addled brain. There is simply no other explanation for his lunatic question.

csdeven on April 21, 2009 at 7:54 AM

I am going to have to go with Steely Dan’s “Do it Again”.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM

As far as the best Steely Dan driving song, I would have to say it would probaby be either that, Bodishatva (sp?), or Josie. Good call, though, on Steely Dan. They are my favorite non-metal, non-band-named Queen band out there. I still have to pick up some of Donald Fagan’s solo stuff.

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 21, 2009 at 8:14 AM

Gay marriage ONLY redefines “man and woman”. Nothing else. It’s still two consenting adults. Again, I’m sure there were people in the South who once thought “If we allow interracial marriage, next thing you know people will want multiple wives or a pet as a spouse.”

And yes, piglet…I still stand by my Civil Union argument. That’s fine…but it has to be equal to marriage under the law.

JetBoy on April 20, 2009 at 2:42 PM

You need to be pulled out of your queer fantasy land. You’re here running your mouth about the south when there are just as many, if not more, racists in the north.

Case in point:

NYPD
Cincinnati PD
All of Pennsylvania
New Jersey

Also, unless you can point to a legitimate dictionary (merriam-webster, Oxford) that contains the word “homophobe”, you’re simply another soddomite using a made up word by the gay lobbyists to force people with traditional values to accept your sick and twisted point of view.

leetpriest on April 21, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Much to the chagrin of Perez Hilton, Miss California did inspire and unite a large section of the population. And I am proud to say that I am one of those people. Hilton didn’t like the answer so now we get the acidic backlash. Same story…different puppet. To Miss California, I’m sure God is very pleased with your show of faith and strength. God bless you.

ice princess on April 21, 2009 at 8:48 AM

The ground of the argument changes, but the positions don’t. Anyway, I don’t mean to muddy the waters here, but perhaps the issue is not as clear as most people believe.

Scott H on April 20, 2009 at 9:14 PM

Which is why I have argued that being homosexual is not a “sin”, it is a natural manifestation that happens in nature.
There is nothing “wrong” with being homosexual, anymore then being heterosexual.
No where in the bible is homosexuality condemned, no law is written against homosexuality, at least any law that cam be upheld.
And since so many equate this to Christian beliefs, I contend that slavery is more accepted and embraced, then homosexuality is condemned.
So on a scale, slavery is accepted, and homosexuality is basically ignored…biblicaly.

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM

Perez needs a dose of the Imus treatment.

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 8:56 AM

In fact, one has to wonder why the organizers invited Perez to be a judge at all.

Umm, like asking a fish to judge air quality?

Seems to me his presence there was intended to make an extraneous political statement.

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Not to belabor the point here, but you did call Garafalo a bull dyke the other day. FYI.

Tacitus_SGL on April 21, 2009 at 3:49 AM

Actually, I called her a bull dyke’s dream. FYI.

MadisonConservative on April 21, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Not a generalized “Christian”.

JetBoy on April 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM

I’m not either. :o) I’m reformed, remember? Distinct doctrine. Works with Catholics on social issues but have documented doctrinal positions which are antithetical to Catholicism. So…I’m not generic. Just reminding you.

Mommypundit on April 21, 2009 at 9:09 AM

No where in the bible is homosexuality condemned, no law is written against homosexuality, at least any law that cam be upheld.

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 8:52 AM

Lev. 18:22 – “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable”

Lev 20:13 – “If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

Vic on April 21, 2009 at 9:14 AM

Seems to me his presence there was intended to make an extraneous political statement.

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Probably more to get some free media coverage. More people likely know the name of this year’s Miss California than they do most of the past winners.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Miss California rocked… more people applauded her than booed her… Perez Hilton has NO BUSINESS being there. People who are in your face same sex attraction have something seriously mentally wrong with them… There is something wrong with anyone who starts talking about their sex life as soon as they meet you. The article by the Catholic Medical Association at http://www.Cathmed.org “Homosexuality and Hope” is the best article I’ve seen so far to help these people.

ironmonk on April 21, 2009 at 9:23 AM

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM

Wow, Doctor Zero. Just, wow.

That really resonated.

Mommypundit on April 21, 2009 at 9:26 AM

UGH…I sat thru that video of the Hilton guy…

eww, what a nasty little girl.

bridgetown on April 21, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Vic on April 21, 2009 at 9:14 AM

Good try…but read the words again, in any language…they are condemning the act.
Nowhere does it condemn being homosexual…the bible only condemns the act.
Keep looking…you won’t find it.
The only thing close is the verses regarding lust, and it applies the same to heterosexual.
Such is how you have been taught…kind of shakes up the “ol faith” doesn’t it?

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 9:28 AM

The article by the Catholic Medical Association at http://www.Cathmed.org “Homosexuality and Hope” is the best article I’ve seen so far to help these people.

How naive and stupid. As a conservative I hate when people write such tripe. Gay people are gay, born that way and no different. Perez Hilton is a moron. Does not matter if he is gay or straight he will always be a moron. The agenda being pushed by some in the Gay community is about acceptance from the government and society because they feel they are less. Most of this is based on self esteem and a political agenda, personally I think she should sue him for slander. It is time to use the courts against them like they have done to conservatives for years.

sargentj on April 21, 2009 at 9:28 AM

They reject the notion that they cannot elevate traditional marriages without denigrating alternative lifestyles, or that tolerance is invalid without approval, and eventually submission. They aren’t much interested in persecuting homosexuals – they’d rather not think about what they do at all – but they’re increasingly angry at the suggestion that honoring and revering marriage between men and women somehow insults everyone who refuses to join them.

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM

This is absolutely true.

Mommypundit on April 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM

Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM

Spot on as usual, Doc.

kingsjester on April 21, 2009 at 9:33 AM

Most of this is based on self esteem and a political agenda, personally I think she should sue him for slander. It is time to use the courts against them like they have done to conservatives for years.

sargentj on April 21, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Is it possible for someone to seek rights with the government for reasons other than self esteem? If a hundred years ago some women had low self esteem should that have been factored into the questions of their right to vote or own property?

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 9:35 AM

I have first hand experience with this subject via a gay brother and sister. Despite the different explanations for the existence of the lifestyle, my observation is that those engaged in the practice of homosexuality simply lack a strong psychological view of themselves and are simply acting out to attain the attention to themselves needed for validation.

The Judge (Hilton) shows the ‘me syndrome’ in his response to his vitriolic attack on Miss California because she did not have the answer he was expecting.

Maybe he ought to put on his own beauty pageant and see if he can win among a group of his peers, all seeking attention.

MSGTAS on April 21, 2009 at 9:35 AM

This is absolutely true.

Mommypundit on April 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM

Actually it is false. Most people are able to elevate their own marriages without requiring the government to not recognize their neighbor’s. If my neighbor is on his third marriage or sleeps around, he may be legally married but I’d personally feel that I was doing something right while he was morally in the dark.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 9:40 AM

The Judge (Hilton) shows the ‘me syndrome’ in his response to his vitriolic attack on Miss California because she did not have the answer he was expecting.

MSGTAS on April 21, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Perez is a self-absorbed attention seeker, making him a good fit for the uber-hetero Donald Trump. Miss CA isn’t the first person he has attacked with his prissy verbal fusillades. He engages in daily celeb bashing that is regularly more crude than witty.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 9:46 AM

I still have to pick up some of Donald Fagan’s solo stuff.

DethMetalCookieMonst on April 21, 2009 at 8:14 AM

Fagen’s “Kamakiriad” is an excellent solo disk.
Was lucky enough to see Steely Dan in concert twice.
The Eagles,The Police and Boston are the only bands beside Steely I have seen that sounded even better live than studio.
———————————————————-

Back on Miss California.
I know it has been mentioned before but I still don’t get why a majority opinion is considered so “controversial”.

I knew that one positive thing that was going to happen with the liberals taking over government is that their hatred and bigotry was not going to be able to be hidden by the media.They were going to feel emboldened to act like Perez, Garofalo,and the DHS report have recently done by demeaning and making outlandish,unsubstantiated claims against people they disagree with.Thus revealing their ignorant hypocrisy when they cry about “open mindedness”,” Tolerance”,and “intellectual debate”.
You would be hard pressed to find anyone less tolerant,open minded,and bigoted than the average liberal.

Baxter Greene on April 21, 2009 at 9:46 AM

How she should’ve answered:

“I agree with President Obama that gay marriage shouldn’t be legal”.

How would Perez have responded to that?!

76United on April 21, 2009 at 9:56 AM

gop news anchor?

getalife on April 21, 2009 at 10:01 AM

gop news anchor?

getalife on April 21, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Would be nice to finally have one.

ClassicCon on April 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM

Matt Lauer gave Carrie a second chance to answer the controversial question this morning on “Today.” Her answer: “The way that I answered might have been offensive … but for me, it was being biblically [sic] correct.”

carbon_footprint on April 21, 2009 at 9:54 AM

The question was “What do you think state governments should do”. If her answer is “be Biblically correct”, that doesn’t translate into a workable system of government.

At the pageant she seems to answered that “people choosing is a good thing”. She almost had the second part perfect–along the lines of: “My faith and family teaches me that marriage is between a man and a woman”. However, by putting in “my country”, it changed the meaning.

Carrie is the single biggest benefactor of what happened. Lauer had her, not the winner, on and she can parlay her principled stand into additional media opportunities.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Carrie is the single biggest benefactor of what happened. Lauer had her, not the winner, on and she can parlay her principled stand into additional media opportunities.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Exactly, and that is exactly what Carrie told Lauer.
One thing about this, it will take some pressure of of Governor Palin being the poster child for conservative women; she get’s a breather while the MSM and everyone else demonizes this gracious, beautiful (from the inside out) woman.

carbon_footprint on April 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM

This is wonderful news Ed :D. I think I feel happy being a Californian. Well until someone does something stupid to tarnish the states good name. Who do you think will burst the bubble?

FontanaConservative on April 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM

Heard this Hilton priss whining today on Laura Ingraham (she played a clip of his whining). Why anyone gives a damn what this sissy man thinks or says is beyond me.

quikstrike98 on April 21, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Really makes me sad to see so many within my own political party be so against gay marriage. And for some dubious reasons.

JetBoy on April 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Meh, I don’t think she’s a good spokeman… and I don’t think she lost because of her position… just her inability to articulate it…

ninjapirate on April 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM

If lower-income polygamous families decide to have lots of children anyway – a preference that tends to be encouraged by religions that endorse polygamy – the strain on social welfare services will be enormous…
Doctor Zero on April 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM

Your posts are so lengthy and wordy that it is hard to respond to them without being the same.
I don’t know if this is true…certainly more children is correct, but I am not sure that polygamists are a strain on the welfare services. The cheating is a strain.

What is happening is because polygamy is illegal, all the women of a “harem” are considered unwed, as single moms. Therefore they are eligible for welfare as a single mom. Which makes, I guess, the argument for legal polygamy?
Almost all the stuff I have found, have been written by very conservative writers. And much of it from one or two articles, then it is dissected and told over and over.
Much like your analogy of hearing something day in and day out for years, so you believe it.

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM

Really makes me sad to see so many within my own political party be so against gay marriage. And for some dubious reasons.

JetBoy on April 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM

And others for such good reasons…
It really makes me sad to see so many gays, within my own political party, that want to co-opt marriage, and for some dubious reasons.

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM

Really makes me sad to see so many within my own political party be so against gay marriage. And for some dubious reasons.

JetBoy on April 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Don’t get my wrong, JetBoy, I like you and respect you very much. I am just happy to see a young woman (from California, no less) speak from her convictions. It’s all about conservative principles and having the courage to share them with the world rather than lie to win a pageant.

carbon_footprint on April 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM

Don’t get my me wrong…

carbon_footprint on April 21, 2009 at 10:44 AM

It really makes me sad to see so many gays, within my own political party, that want to co-opt marriage, and for some dubious reasons.

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM

Is it really possible for gays to co-opt something that each couple tends to define for itself. The term is not trademarked by a particular group, anymore than the term son or daughter is.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM

Awkward? Talk about understatement.

Imagine a Jewish judge asking a Christian contestant if she believed that Jesus was the son of God. What if she answers in the affirmative and the judge finds that offensive?

What if a contestant doesn’t believe in global warming?

Is PC belief now the standard for these events?

Perez Hilton is an idiot. That pageant would do well to distance itself from him or find oblivion.

drjohn on April 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Perez Hilton is an idiot. That pageant would do well to distance itself from him or find oblivion.

drjohn on April 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Perez is a (loud-mouthed) idiot, but I’m sure Trump is thrilled with what happened, given that most pageants are little viewed and soon forgotten.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM

What if a contestant doesn’t believe in global warming?

drjohn on April 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Stay tuned… 5…4…3…

petefrt on April 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

She was wonderful.

I do not see this episode as a failure.

I do not think the organizers were stupid. I think they were cynical about the pageant itself

There are many calls in the Bible to be a witness and Hilton gave the contestant a wonderful opportunity to testify in front of a huge audience.

The audience learned there are people willing to forsake wealth and fame to be true to their faith

Christians throughout history have been made to stand before the crowd and asked to denounce their beliefs. So many refused and suffered horrible martyrdom for their truths

This will make those in agreement with her stronger

Christ did not say it would get easier. He warned Christians wold be hated

The episode was revealing of how far down the path of decadence and disgrace our society has fallen.

Hilton is a brave man. In another setting, were he to ask a shiite muslim female the same question, would he be so brave to call her a b—- if she disapproved gay marriage?

entagor on April 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

I’ve always been a little surprised at all the wringing of hands that we conservatives do when we are called either “racists” or “bigots” or “homophobes”.

Why are we surprised? It doesn’t even affect me anymore. Why? Because I don’t think these people have any idea of what a ‘racist’ is. Or a ‘bigot’ or a ‘homophobe’ actually IS.
And yes, that goes for anyone black, or gay. ANYONE who so casually tosses that label around has truly lost sight of what the true meaning of the term IS.

As for Perez. He should pipe down before his own tierra falls off his head. In my humble opinion, he can just stick it where the sun don’t shine.

(or would that be a bad choice of words?)

Handel on April 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Is it really possible for gays to co-opt something that each couple tends to define for itself. The term is not trademarked by a particular group, anymore than the term son or daughter is.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM

Of course noting in the public domain is trademarked.
You can go in and tell the doctor that you have a pain in the ankle…and after he has looked at your ankle and said nothing is wrong, you can point to your heart and say “I call my heart an ankle, it isn’t trademarked”.
A son, is a male, a daughter is a female, you don’t understand that?
You have sons, and daughters…or a son-in-law, or daughter-in-law, if by marriage. Yes you can call your son-in-law your son, but it isn’t accurate. And legally it isn’t accurate. That’s why you have probate, and will’s.
Your analogy proved my point…the terms need to be defined, are defined, for a specific reason(s).

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Perez is a (loud-mouthed) idiot, but I’m sure Trump is thrilled with what happened, given that most pageants are little viewed and soon forgotten.

dedalus on April 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Trump doesn’t own this one…

right2bright on April 21, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Comment pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9


You must be logged in to post a comment.