Video: Perez Hilton at the Miss USA contest?
posted at 1:35 pm on April 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Mix an almost-anachronistic beauty contest with an outspoken gay liberal blogger, and you get … a classically awkward moment. I’ve gotten a lot of e-mail about Miss California’s response to Perez Hilton about her stance on gay marriage, all of it cheering her defense of traditional values:
According to the person who clipped and uploaded the video, Miss California got booed, but if so, not by many. Perez himself shakes his head in annoyance, but what did he expect? These beauty contests are celebrations of kitschy Americana — of bathing suits and evening gowns, of “world peace” and apple pie.
In fact, one has to wonder why the organizers invited Perez to be a judge at all. Surely Perez’ readership doesn’t represent their core audience, and his celebrity-dish-loving readers could care less about Gracie Lou from North Dakota anyway. It’s a very strange choice. And Perez proves it by calling Miss California a “dumb b****” for not agreeing with him:
Stay classy, Perez. And I think you need something much stronger than a cocktail. (Thanks to my co-blogger Allahpundit for the second vid)
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 9 Next »
Let’s just say that the majority of Americans… a good 79% choose to define marriage as between a male and female. It has absolutely nothing to do with being a “homophobe” or being anti-gay… It’s just defining it so. Is this not a country of the people, by the people, for the people?
CynicalOptimist on April 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM
Good luck with being politically correct and proper. How’s that working out for you so far?
Gregor on April 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM
I see TTheo’s not alone in his idea that Perez Hilton acting like the douchebag that he is, is somehow a license to start smearing homosexuals en masse. I’m sure it will do wonders for Hot Air’s reputation. Keep up the crappy work!
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Wow, you’re good. You can tell she’s not a real blonde from just the video.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM
Would any of us know who Perez Hilton was if it weren’t ghey?
PappaMac on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Most gay-marriage supporters are hateful bigots. I don’t think that you are, personally, but most of the rest of them are – as perez hilton illustrates so clearly. ALso as the post Prop 8 goons illustrated. That is what the gay-marriage movement is all about.
progressoverpeace on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Cynical, it doesn’t matter if they are “homophobes” or not, that’s what people like jetboy will call them. It’s all about “intellectual bullying”… in other words, insulting you till you are too afraid not to agree publicly.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
If I was in charge of the Miss USA pageant, I’d put Perez Hilton on notice that my lawyers are looking into his comments and behavior.
Furthermore, if I was Miss California or her parents, I’d be talking to a lawyer as well.
Oink on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Ya, that never made much sense. Why is it that the folks who cry and throw tantrums about “labels” are the ones who toss them around the most?
I guess I am a liberalphobe, a homophobe, an Islamophobe, and illegalalienphobe, a murdererphobe, a (NY)Yankeephobe, a Lakersphobe, a bloodpuddingphobe, a rushhourtrafficphobe, an IRSphobe (ok that might fit).
People can “phobe off”. My dislike of a person usually comes after they open their mouth (or bang some keys on a keyboard).
reaganaut on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
For that now she will be The peoples Miss America :)
I’d rather have her as president than Nobama.
jaboba on April 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Well, at least he didn’t call her a breeder…
RepubChica on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
If you look at Perez’s website, you will see that he is EXTREMELY close-minded. He is the epitome of the “tolerant” left…we are tolerant so long as you agree with us. Otherwise, you are ________ (insert nazi, bigot, racist, idiot or extremist, etc.
Btw, dcwvu, did you go to WVU and now live in the DC area??
hollygolightly on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Actually, it was thrown off a cliff. Those Iranians are such sweethearts.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Ms. Perez Hilton is open-minded to a fault.
Isn’t Perez “The Pizza Whisperer” in the Round Table Pizza commercials?
omnipotent on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Why is he not a hateful bigot? He regularly calls everyone names who disagrees with him on here, and continues to insult them all. That’s not hateful?
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Pop culture and the msm think it’s “controversial” to support marriage?
Wow.
We hardly knew ye.
artist on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Perez Hilton obviously had an agenda with this question: there was, in his mind, a right answer and an answer that would disqualify one from winning the crown.
If the litmus test for Miss USA is approving of gay marriage, then I hope the organization will be open and frank about this qualification in the future.
Bravo to Miss California for unapologetically offering her opinion on a personal matter of conscience rather than caving to a bully who she knew would punish her for not sharing his own opinion.
patriette on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
This piece of shit has suffered brain damage from ingesting too much male reproductive fluid.
maladapted on April 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Is this not a country of “Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”?
Why deny Americans this?
My main point is…The anti-gay marriage people aren’t protecting anything. They’re denying.
Again, no one…NO ONE…loses anything at all by allowing gays to marry. Nothing, nada, zilch.
JetBoy on April 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM
Jetboy only gets animated about gay marriage and McCain. Otherwise, he seems pretty decent.
progressoverpeace on April 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM
Headline: “Obama increases contacts with [fill in the blank]“
SouthernRoots on April 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM
FIFY
Puddleglum on April 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM
Roger that King, and I just hate bullies on either side.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM
So if you only attack people in the most vicious of ways for issues important to you… that’s not hateful.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM
*Spits on the ground*
Number one, I ain’t afraid to stand my ground.
Number two, I’m just trying to talk some sense into my “friend”
Number three….See number one.
CynicalOptimist on April 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM
I am highly offended that this un-liberated woman was allowed to have an opinion and express it. Especially an opinion that reflects over 5000 years of moral, ethical and religious values. Surely, the norms of the last five years trump everything we’ve ever understood about family, marriage, society, child-rearing and nature.
And I live in NC… We won, get over it!
;)
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Hate him if you will, but Perez has the ear of almost everyone in America under the age of 30. His website gets more hits in 15 minutes than HA gets all day. He’s doing something very right and in the process has become a very rich and famous young man.
dcwvu on April 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Why deny civilization it for 5000 years? Probably because there’s no rational basis for homosexual marriage?
You’re the last person to be lecturing people on how to be an american. All you ever do on this issue is call everyone names and insult anyone who disagrees with you. Stop being such a homonazi if you want to be taken seriously on the issue as opposed to being seen as a bully.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Hawkdiver
Unfurl your brows. I am serious. If she wanted to win she should have said something like… We live in a democracy and the people get to decide… etc. She still could have said she was against it herself but in the end it wasn’t for just her to decide. She didn’t answer the test correctly. And it is a BEAUTY CONTEST. There is a bikini competition!!! I’m sorry I have to laugh at the sticking to your values argument.
sammypants on April 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Goofball.
It’s NOT about “liberty”
The gay agenda is about KILLING CHRISTIANITY.
Step 1. Legalize gay marriage
Step 2. Arrest Christian ministers for giving New Testament sermons that condemn homosexuality (see Sweden, 2003: http://www.albertmohler.com/commentary_print.php?cdate=2004-08-05 )
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Which means that most people under 30 have been thoroughly brainwashed.
This country will not last with those kinds of people.
newton on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
And she is from San Diego!!
A Californian standing up for traditional marriage!! Take note California bashing commenters
Theworldisnotenough on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
He’s a celebrity-obsessed hack. Fox News does a better job of slobbering over them than he does.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
I can promise you in the next few years more and more “hate crimes” charges will be filed by people like jetboy against Christian ministers and groups. It’s already happened in Canada and Europe, and will definitely be happening here soon. It’s all about their obsession with forcing everyone to approve of their lifestyle.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
No, no one loses anything at all. We GAIN everything: Men marrying men, women marrying women, polygamous marriages… and why stop there? If “marriage” is all about “love” then why should your neighbor be able to marry his 14-year old cousin? or counsinS?
greggriffith on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
When I think of Gays the lasting image in my mind is that of the gay activist snatching that old lady’s cross, throwing it on the ground and stomping it.
It just screamed intolerant, thugs.
Kjeil on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
That’s my biggest pet peeve, but the last time I mentioned it to someone I got mobbed for being the word police.
BadgerHawk on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Wait, are you talking about yourself, megs, or someone else?
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Shameless activists now have to take their adgenda to asking biases questions at the Miss America pagent?
Funniest thing about it is his own scripted “correct” answer is what the California voters did. If he’s so hot on states voters being able to make the choice, why isn’t he assaulting the California judges who would not let the will of the people stand, not their Miss America representative?
Scrappy on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
You’re a piece of work.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
*why should your neighbor NOT be able…
FIFM.
greggriffith on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
JetBoy is under the delusion that SSM has no negative consequences for anyone, and we’d all join hands and sing around the campfire if only those bigots would get out of the way.
Of course, the real agenda of the people leading the SSM movement is to force or marginalize anyone, anywhere, who has an opinion other than “anal sex with men is the greatest thing on earth.” Listen up dude, I’m not going to sit here and agree that watching YOUR people, Jetboy, the ones you champion, burn down MY churches and you call me a bigot.
My church is under increasing threats from you and your ilk, and I WILL resist forced gay doctrine being shoved down my throat–literally, as your leaders want us do. I know you yourself make noises about religions not being in danger, but you also are the man who claims that wearing a cross around gay men is “provocative” and that those who do, especially little old ladies, deserve whatever happens to them. In short, while you are Catholic, your gayness comes first, and woe be anyone who stands in your way.
Vanceone on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
People like jetboy have no concern for their ramifications of their actions. They only care about the getting their way for the moment.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
So if a Christian judge asks about world peace and the contestant says that she believes that “all religions are equal and must come together to foster love [blah blah blah]“… and the judge goes on a rant later about how she’s wrong and no one who ever holds an opinion opposed to Christianity’s superiority should lose… you’d be hailing the judge as some sort of hero? Right………
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
OMG, he’s got a web-site and he’s rich. What was I thinking. Yep, that means he’s right. Sorry P, bend on over so I plant a kiss on your rich ass and accept whatever you say as the gospel.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Uh oh, megs is having a tizzy again.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM
You’re whining about others calling people names and insulting them. Are you a born hypocrite, or did you master hypocrisy as you went along?
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM
You’re kidding right???? Have you ever READ a comment page of perez
obviously not.
about 33% of the commenters just call him “f%g”, and another 33% stand up for common sense (“miss usa has the right to her opinion, agree with her or not”) and the other 33% are depressed gay teenagers that would be pro-gay everything anyway.
perez sways NO ONE. and for you to say that means you never have read a single comment page by him.
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM
I’m no beauty pagent fan, but it does worry me.
It used to be that there was a seperation between personal relations and politics. This incident is just another case of that line being ignored. See also the firing of Mormons who donated to Prop 8.
Remember the 60′s battlecry that the personal was political?
That’s what I’m seeing again, only with a larger level of acceptance.
If you don’t have the right politics, the left feels free to go after you personally. Attack your employment because you donated to the wrong side. Make judgment against you in a beauty contest because you believe the wrong thing (what does that have to do with the contest?). Ect.
It’s only a matter of time until they become bold enough to touch the ultimate third rail. They will say that children need protection from indoctrination in “hateful bigotry”.
Whether “corrective action” will take place through the school system or through some more direct method I can not say, but that won’t matter. If it takes place in the school system Christain parents will resort to home schooling, which will then be forbidden, and the result will be the same.
Open civil war.
There are few thing in this world that people are willing to die for, and even fewer they are willing to kill for. God and family are two of them. Combine them by forcibly indoctrinating children again traditional Christain moral teachings, and you’ll have 30% of the population feeling that the only way to protect the immortal souls of their children is violent resistence.
It’s coming- and apparently the left just can’t see what they are doing. Tolerence requires both sides to accept the others right to believe differently without retaliation.
But today the left thinks tolerence means we just have to shutup and agree with them.
Sackett on April 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM
They showed the scoring and she was ALWAYS 2nd behind Miss NC. That was BEFORE they even asked the question. It was pretty consistent that way. I even commented on it earlier. I didn’t realize it was Hot Air material.
ThackerAgency on April 20, 2009 at 2:17 PM
“win” that is.
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:18 PM
I see megs is taking some advice from jetboy.
I called jetboy a homonazi for insulting anyone who disgrees with him and trying to shout them down and bully them into changing their opinions. Is that over your head?
Oh wait, I’m talking to megs mccain here.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Is that Perez in Ron Jeremys’ “One Eyed Monster”?
Coronagold on April 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Laugh all you want. Your integrity is like your virginity. It can only be given up once.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
this is the only reason i have hope.
like the hippies in the 60s, what you describe is an OVERREACH. the white autoworker in michigan and the black teacher in memphis and the korean shopowner in east L.A. won’t put up with that for long.
eventually a backlash will come of “that’s not an american value to shut people up!”
the backlash is coming, believe me.
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
He chose to be one.
BadgerHawk on April 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
You miss the point. They’re on his site! They care enough about his site to post comments. His advertisers couldn’t care less why they’re there, as long as they show up — and with every hit he’s smiling all the way to the bank.
dcwvu on April 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Miss CA expressed the view held by the majority of citizens in the US. Certainly of those in her home state.
I’m really sick of this…These idiots are going to piss and moan, bully and intimidate until they get their way on this. Disgusting.
Dork B. on April 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Stay classy, Perez. And I think you need something much stronger than a cocktail.
Well, he needs a cock-something.
What a moron. The whole world is behind his idiotic little cause.
RWLA on April 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM
She missed her pandering classes.
TheSitRep on April 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Don’t you think re-defining marriage, the bed-rock of civilization — could have some dangerous consquences? If we expand the definition to same-sex couples because everyone has the right to pursue happiness, there’s no justification for not expanding the definition to threesomes, foursomes, or whatever other kind of pairing/grouping people come up with in the name of pursuing “happiness”. What about polygamy? bigamy? bestiality? Once we destroy the concept of the nuclear family as it is traditionally understood, we’re faced with chaos and self-destruction. Look to any inner-city with preposterously high illegitimacy rates for an illustration. “Marriage” as a western institution between one man and one woman has survived for thousands of years for very good reason.
I’m not trying to pick a fight with you Jetboy — I actually really like and respect your comments — but I’m interested in your perspective on these issues.
patriette on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Her crime was expressing her opinion… get used to more such “crimes” coming to your town.
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
So you insulted someone because they insulted someone, while simultaneously crying about insults being thrown at people you agree with.
I’d say that goes along with your ever-so-erudite line of reasoning that referring to me as Meghan McCain somehow gives you credibility or takes away from mine. Keep on keepin’ on.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
BARACK OBAMA IS AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE
IS BARACK OBAMA A STUPID DUMB B#$%^ PEREZ??????????
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
<blockquoteYour integrity is like your virginity. It can only be given up once.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM
that is my whole point. I feel like she gave up her integrity when she let those judges give her points on how she looked 98% naked.
sammypants on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
1. Religious denominations lose when they’re persecuted by discrimination suits for not performing gay wedding ceremonies.
2. Likewise, religious denominations lose when they’re persecuted for the termination of tax-exempt status because they don’t promote the gay agenda.
3. Our children lose when they get the gay agenda shoved down their throats at every turn in every course.
I’m glad I decided to watch the Hallmark presentation about the Polish nurse who saved twice as many children as Schindler. Watching the intolerance of Nazis reminded me of the intolerance of those like Perez.
BuckeyeSam on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
This movement would force pastors of Christian churches to perform these marriages that they do not condone or agree with at threat of a lawsuit.
So in essence, you’re forcing people to accept your unnatural behavior that they don’t agree with. Gee, how tolerant of you.
Actually, they do. Married couples get tax breaks, people with children get tax breaks. Married couples (man and woman) can procreate and produce another tax-paying citizen, thus negating the break in taxes, as it’s made up for by the tax-paying citizen that is produced from procreation. You and the rest of the soddomites in the word that are molesting each other’s anal orifice cannot produce children, therefore, you’re reaping the benefits, yet not producing the work.
Of course you, like any other soddomizing homosexual, will argue adoption, however, it’s been proven that children with a father figure AND a mother figure present turn out much better than those that don’t have both elements. Therefore, you’re going to turn out another sexually confused child that turns away from what is NATURAL (believe it or not, you sticking your little thing inside of someone’s anal crevice isn’t natural).
leetpriest on April 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM
He was invited, because they wanted to give a rabid homosexual a soapbox, so as to deliver a rabidly homosexual oriented question for the viewers to hear.
It’s all about constant exposure of that which is abomination. With constant exposure … it’s not an abomination … why … it’s just not that bad at all. That is the mindset that the homosexuals desire in mainstream America. And that is why he got his soapbox moment.
OhEssYouCowboys on April 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM
You only think that because you’re a hypophobe.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Funny, the legion of European Christian ministers JAILED because of gay marriage would disagree with you.
Step 1. Legalize gay marriage
Step 2. Arrest Christian ministers for giving New Testament sermons that condemn homosexuality (see Sweden, 2003: http://www.albertmohler.com/commentary_print.php?cdate=2004-08-05 )
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM
I guaran-dim-damn-tee you, that if some social conservative asked the question and the contestant came out for “gay marriage”… then the conservative made the same face and ranted about it later… said conservative’s life would be over.
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM
He was invited, because they wanted to give a rabid homosexual a soapbox, so as to deliver a rabidly homosexual oriented question for the viewers to hear.
No question about it.
RWLA on April 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM
I think Megs here may have blown a gasket. You’re basically trying to make the case here that calling someone intolerant for insulting and attacking anyone who disagrees with them as being hypocritical.
Might want to go back to the dailybeast.com and write some more columns about your cheekbones, megs. This seems to be over your head.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Yeah, but if the GOP does accept gay marriage, the party is DOOMED!!!
/DavidFrum & the RINOS
Norwegian on April 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Actually, it’s not. Within the past month 2 states have legalized gay marriage. As the old guard is quickly dying off each and every day, the newer, much much more tolerant younger generation is coming into power who have only known and lived in a world that has always had gay people in it. With each poll each year, those in favor of gay rights is getting stronger. You’re fighting a losing battle and there is a shift in values in America and you know it. The desperate fear of your ilk is in the air.
dcwvu on April 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM
This, is a fact. The convictions of Christians will have no place in the coming world society. Christians have been on the forefront of standing up for human rights. They stopped the of burning a living wife along with her dead husband in India. When being born a girl wasn’t popular in the Greek society, it was the Christians who rescued the babies when they were left to die of exposure. It was Christians who stood up for the “witches” during the Salem witch trials and stopped those.
CynicalOptimist on April 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Words fail me. Please, just STFU.
capitalist piglet on April 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Disengaging before I sprain my brow.
hawkdriver on April 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Is perez the hilton sister that didn’t survive birth?
talk about projection.
jcrue on April 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM
ROFL!!!
God forbid, Hardees ask this noodle brain to don a skimpy bathing suit, and rub himself all over a soapy car, to sell their burgers.
capejasmine on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
It’s sort of like the situation with the boy scouts. They have done nothing but good for American society, but they oppose homosexual scout leaders, therefore they are horrible, awful people that must be exposed as such.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Perez Hilton’s gigantic meat-face should be an FCC violation.
Jim Treacher on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
I think Perez has really queered his argument.
HornetSting on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
CApitalist, this was a bait. He was trying to see who would agree with him so he could expose them as being hateful.
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM
And the Emmy for Lead Actress in a Reality Series goes to…Perez Hilton!
Christien on April 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Muslim Contestant: “I believe that each state should be able to make that choice, but I was taught growing up that a man having four wives is the suprior way.”
Christian judge makes a face.
Cue cheering throngs and every lefty blogger running to the keyboard to screech about “not judging another culture.”
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM
You didn’t call anyone intolerant. You called them “homonazi”. It’s derogatory, and if you insist otherwise, you’re a liar.
MadisonConservative on April 20, 2009 at 2:27 PM
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM
“superior”
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:27 PM
It sounds like a bad idea to have gay men judging female beauty. I don’t think they grasp the concept of feminine beauty and you can tell that by the clothes designers.
Buddahpundit on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
Perfect answer to this activist Lib:
“Well in this case I agree with President Obama, that marriage should remain between one man and one woman as has traditionally been defined”
jp on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
This is why we can’t have nice things.
carbon_footprint on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
OMG! Someone has a different view of the world than me! Quick get the torches! Witch! Witch! How could she be so intolerant.
faol on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
Gay marriage supporters: “Why won’t you agree with us, you stupid hateful F***ers?!?!?!”
Common sense must not be in the hypothalamus after all…
battleoflepanto1571 on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
Well hell the lady has a right to her opinion. And this Perez character is a tacky little toad. Dumb b**** indeed. Geez. Well let’s see, now if someone called him a faggot that would be bad wouldn’t it?
Terrye on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
dcwvu and the other gay apologists think that we are fighting a losing battle against SSM.
It may well be. It may well be. But I promise you this: Lots of young people will not like the pictures of a priest or minister going to jail because you people cannot stand anyone speaking against you. The Prop 8 protests will have a backlash.
You gays are, in the most part, intolerant bigots.
Vanceone on April 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM
I hear all this talk about tolerance, which means something different today, and the idea that CHRISTIANS AREN’T TOLERANT! What I want to know…. Aren’t those screaming for tolerance being intolerant of intolerance?
CynicalOptimist on April 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Yup… every fascist movement was sold as a “youth movement” dimsissing the “old guard.”
mankai on April 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM
sammypants on April 20, 2009 at 2:21 PM
So, you’re saying it’s okay to engage in situational ethics? Do you work for The Administration or the DNC?
kingsjester on April 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM
I’m sure you’re trying to make a point here, but just seem to be doing a very poor job. Help us to help you, megs, what are you trying to say?
TTheoLogan on April 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 9 Next »