Hastings, Jefferson, et.al.: nothing to see here.

Harman: hang her by her toenails!!!

*eats popcorn*

Major Update: Seems the CQ Story is falling apart as the NY Times denies ever talking to Harman regarding the NSA-FISA story. Where there is one error, there are probably others.  - end update
Drama Queen Update Below
Well, before the drama queens on …

Despite being a Dem, Harmon was somewhat respected by the ‘right wing extremists’ for being at least somewhat sensible about defending America. So this situation will hurt her image with the right, and perhaps force her back into the Pelosi wing of idiocy.

PLUS, they get to bash Israel and do the troofer ‘jews run the world’ thing and use this as evidence.

Next up for this kind of thing? Joe Lieberman???? —- Or some other democrat that is occasionally sane about defense of the USA and friendship with Israel???

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/04/a_rahm_bomb_for_jane_harman.html

p.s. In this case, I believe the scare quotes are appropriate. Blue on blue crime.

If they pursue this I wonder how many dirtbag Democrats she’ll bring down with her?

rplat on April 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM

That will be her only saving grace, other than the simple fact that there is no level of Democrap government corruption that Democraps deem worthy of investigation.

The Pelosi Libtards hate Harman almost as much as they hate AIPAC.

The theory was the dems were briefed or they were being blackmailed.

It was both and now they are getting spied on. Karma.

I have no pity on those who steal American freedom. They are failed Americans like those who believe in torture.

Obstruction of justice in exchange for personal gain?

It’s what they do.

…that’s what separates us from liberals.

It’s called a conscience.

Non sequitur doesn’t even cover it. So we should have said something we didn’t say, but we shouldn’t have said it? Is that about it?

Try food with medication.

Beagle on April 20, 2009 at 1:26 PMNon sequitur doesn’t even cover it. So we should have said something we didn’t say, but we shouldn’t have said it? Is that about it?

Try food with medication.

Beagle on April 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM

It’s the same as the WH putting out a press release that they were “unaware” of the Tea Parties. Ok, why put out a presser on something you are unaware of?

after botching the routine dismissal of political appointments at the DoJ

Routine dismissal? Talk about revisionist history.

That guy was pure scum.

CQ Politics has published an article claiming the National Security Administration has an audio recording of Congresswoman Jane Harman (CA 36) offering an Israeli agent help in getting charges reduced against two men in return for Israeli aid in her……

If cons actually believe in freedom, where is the outrage on spying on Americans?

There is none.

Lets put that freedom argument to rest cons.

getalife on April 20, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Non sequitur doesn’t even cover it. So we should have said something we didn’t say, but we shouldn’t have said it? Is that about it?

Try food with medication.

There is none.

Lets put that freedom argument to rest cons.

I smell Hillary Clinton.

jake-the-goose on April 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM

I smell bus exhaust.

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/04/16/schakowsky-tea-parties-despicable/

To propose a budget that would double the federal deficit in 10 years after promising just six months ago to cut the deficit in half over five years, is quite a feat. Then, to say that doubling the debt in 10 years will not require increased taxation is a bridge too far.

Names can never hurt me. : ))

I agree with the previous trifecta argument.

Libs hate:

1. Wiretaps
2. Gonzales
3. AIPAC

This is going to be fun to watch. Grab your popcorn.

Cuffy Meigs on April 20, 2009 at 11:03 AM

#1 should read Warrantless Wiretaps, but other than that, you’re right. It’s unclear whether the wiretaps on Harman were gained by proper procedure or not. If they were properly obtained, then I’m thrilled to see Harman, Gonzales, and AIPAC all go down.