Video: Rick Perry asserts Texas’s Tenth Amendment rights

posted at 4:00 pm on April 14, 2009 by Allahpundit

Not sure why Drudge is touting this today given that it was uploaded almost a week ago. Maybe it’s a tea-party aperitif or maybe it’s just his wry counterpoint to the DHS report on “right-wing radicals.” Either way, it’s a dynamite stunt by Perry, guaranteed to resonate tomorrow and to raise his profile with the base ahead of 2012. There’s no reason I can think of, aside from pure showmanship, to pass a resolution formally asserting their Tenth Amendment rights; if they’re serious about challenging The One on that ground, they could just pick some federal statute and sue. They’d almost certainly lose — the courts historically have treated the Tenth Amendment as a glorified footnote — but Anthony Kennedy’s been surprisingly conservative in some of his federalism jurisprudence. He, Scalia, and Thomas were all part of the conservative majority that revived limits on the Commerce Clause 15 years ago. The time might be ripe for a Tenth Amendment reawakening in a similar vein. Picture it: A right-wing Court deftly wielding a key clause from the Bill of Rights to strike down one piece of progressive economic legislation after another. What could go wrong?

I’m tempted to check Memeorandum to see how many nutroots all-stars are breathing into paper bags and spinning this as some sort of neo-confederate call for secession, but the aggravation’s just not worth it.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Texas our Texas!

It ain’t the boldest and grandest for nuthin’!

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM

The Obama administration today added Governor Rick Perry to the, “Right Wing Extremist Watch List” for daring to challenge The One’s Supremacy.

TheBigOldDog on April 14, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Texans always move them!
http://www.victoriaheilshorn.com/texans.html

max1 on April 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM

but the aggravation’s just not worth it.

And you want a troll hole.

lorien1973 on April 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Please secede, and take Oklahoma with you. We’d have grain, cattle, oil and a port … and term limits, please.

Thanking you in advance.

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Forget 2012; hopefully, this will help him in his primary fight against Hutchinson.

yogi41 on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Hutchison (the hag) is beating Perry in the polls. If Perry would close Texas borders and ban sanctuary cities, and not sell Texas highways to Spain, he could be President…He has a nice wife.

nondhimmie on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Let it be known that Jonny Mac didn’t deign to mention this governor either on Leno.

jimmy the notable on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Looks like Perry’s motioning to take the spotlight for 2010, perhaps in time to get his resume submitted for two years after.

MadisonConservative on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Obama has been waiting for his Abe Lincoln moment. Here you go fella.

“We must preserve the Union”- Honest Obe.

portlandon on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Perry is doing some good for himself. Bravo for his stand.

jencab on April 14, 2009 at 4:06 PM

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM

The good governor did emphasize the U.S. Constitution – though admittedly not often mentioned in Austin – but valid nonetheless.

Texas does not need to secede – it needs to lead the fight to get California and New York to secede and take D.C with them!

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:06 PM

Picture it: A right-wing Court deftly wielding a key clause from the Bill of Rights to strike down one piece of progressive economic legislation after another. What could go wrong?

I figure a left-wing court packing is going to happen anyway…strike while the opportunity presents itself.

AUINSC on April 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM

Texas…don’t mess wif it.

Handel on April 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM

Terrorist!

BobH on April 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Texas does not need to secede – it needs to lead the fight to get California and New York to secede and take D.C with them!

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:06 PM

You mean Illinois can stay? Are you sure you want that?

WashJeff on April 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM

God Bless Texas!

BobH on April 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM

Not sure why Drudge is touting this today given that it was uploaded almost a week ago.

Not just Drudge – Rush, Ingraham, Ace, and the blogosphere, for starters.

Either way, it’s a dynamite stunt by Perry, guaranteed to resonate tomorrow and to raise his profile with the base ahead of 2012.

You say ‘stunt’, I say ‘stand’.

I’m tempted to check Memeorandum to see how many nutroots all-stars are breathing into paper bags and spinning this as some sort of neo-confederate call for secession, but the aggravation’s just not worth it.

Cute.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:09 PM

Either way, it’s a dynamite stunt by Perry, guaranteed to resonate tomorrow and to raise his profile with the base ahead of 2012.

It’s working on me. But then, who else do we have? I sure as hell ain’t voting for Hutchison.

XWing5 on April 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM

What could go wrong?

So what percentage of the people do you think believe that the SCOTUS is fixed at 9 justices by the consitution? 95%? 98%?

WashJeff on April 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM

Great Gov. Perry. I am a proud Texan and this is hopefully amoung numerous states doing this. DC and bho have gone over the constitution, I know that nasty little paper our country was founded on.
L

letget on April 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM

get California and New York to secede and take D.C with them!

Maybe that’s too ambitious…let’s just get rid of the UN for now.

jgapinoy on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

You mean Illinois can stay? Are you sure you want that?

WashJeff on April 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM

(laugh)
The wife is from Illinois and she’d tell you that you mean Chicago – not the whole state. It is really two different places.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

I’m tempted to check Memeorandum to see how many nutroots all-stars are breathing into paper bags and spinning this as some sort of neo-confederate call for secession, but the aggravation’s just not worth it.

It never is.

Jaibones on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

get California and New York to secede and take D.C with them!

Maybe that’s too ambitious…let’s just get rid of the UN for now.

jgapinoy on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

That’s a movement I could get behind.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

I think Texas will be the first of many. Missouri will join, I hope sooner, rather than later.

Star20 on April 14, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Progressive economic legislation”?

I’m mystified how alleged conservatives continue to use the semantics of Socialism.

They use “progressive” for a reason. To pacify the simple minded and to encourage the foolish to call them what they want, instead of what they are.

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Can we at least agree on the right terminology? The states have no rights — they have powers. Rights belong to people, not states. Check out what the Tenth Amendment says:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Powers, not rights.

Anyone who speaks of “states’ rights” isn’t just misusing terminology — he’s buying into a whole sordid history.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on April 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM

Here I am, stuck in CA.

Spent 14 good years in Dallas. Wish I’d never left.

Harry Schell on April 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM

The wife is from Illinois and she’d tell you that you mean Chicago – not the whole state. It is really two different places.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Very true. Unfortunately, Chicago pols run Illinois, and have been for the last ten years.

So just Cook County, California, and NY it is.

WashJeff on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

The wife is from Illinois and she’d tell you that you mean Chicago – not the whole state. It is really two different places.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Chicago is a steaming cess pool, no doubt about it. But your wife must have been gone a long time if she thinks the rest of Illinois is much better.

I’ve been here since 1964, and the southern part of Cook County is just as big a shithole as Chicago.

Jaibones on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Second look at Rick Perry.

petefrt on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

I’m a lifetime South Texas resident. I havent always agreed with Perry.

But I do today.

NickTx on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

I think Texas will be the first of many. Missouri will join, I hope sooner, rather than later.

Star20 on April 14, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Wasn’t it the Governor of Missouri that came out strongly against the Obama political speech hit squads that were running around threatening to sue anybody who spoke against The One?

TheBigOldDog on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

As a Houston resident, I have to say…whooooooo hooooooooooo!!!

capejasmine on April 14, 2009 at 4:17 PM

Heck, it may be new to y’all, but he’s been all over the radio in the DFW area for days. And will be attending several Tea party events.

Personally, Hutchison can retire, let Perry stay where he is and get some one new to push Cornin (he has been kind of iffy lately).

cozmo on April 14, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Star20 on April 14, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Don’t count on it, Star. We have an 0bama nut for governor right now. He won’t do anything to upset his master.

Torch on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Texas joined the Union by treaty. The rules are a little different for them. I wish they would exercise them. Actually, I think it is allowed to divide itself into 6 states which would give it 12 senators. I say divide! Dethrone Harry Reid and give Obama some much needed opposition.

bopbottle on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

letget on April 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM

I don’t follow Texas politics. Here in Chicago, we have our hands full. Does Perry have what it takes to make it to the Presidency? What is the overall opinion of him in the state?

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

I haven’t been too fond of Perry in the past but he’s starting to grow on me. :)
Beats Hutchinson all to hell.

Aggie85 on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

TheBigOldDog on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

That was the prior governor, Matt Blunt. We have Jay Nixon, a Democrat, now. Like I said in my previous post, he won’t do a thing to upset his master, 0bama.

Torch on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

I’ve been here since 1964, and the southern part of Cook County is just as big a shithole as Chicago.

Jaibones on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Our Chicago politician Governor Deval Patrick is busy declaring an economic crisis and trying to raise taxes on everything in sight while hiring every single one of his political supporters for high paying, no-show patronage jobs. Even the MA Moonbats have turned on him now for his blatant corruption.

TheBigOldDog on April 14, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Not to rain on Gov. Perry’s parade – which I am in complete agreement with, but Abe Lincoln put an end to the 10th Amendment question back in the (18)60′s. Unfortunately, this part of the Constitution is no longer constitutional.

Filecchio on April 14, 2009 at 4:21 PM

I’m with Rick.. it all starts somewhere…

Doogiesd on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Torch on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

That’s really bad news…

TheBigOldDog on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

My conservative Texas friend swears Perry is all hat and no cattle. He may be better than Kay Bailey, but I would watch out before getting too excited about him on a national level, we may be walking straight into another McCain.

AdrianG on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

bopbottle on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

That is bit murky since 1865 – that whole defeated in war and surrendering deal. I’m a Texan and that is hard to admit -but it lost because it needed to lose that one.

In other news – we are a different nation now (both Texas – and America too…) our mindset it different than it was then – not to mention the whole situation.
Secession is not really possible right now – but outrage, dissension, and flat-out protests are not!

I want to see Texas leading the way to a better America – not just a better Texas.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

I don’t think he has what it takes to be President.

Aggie85 on April 14, 2009 at 4:23 PM

I think it is allowed to divide itself into 6 states which would give it 12 senators

I think in the case of Texas, it is 5 states, though I might be wrong. In either case, point well taken and I agree with you!

XWing5 on April 14, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Texas joined the Union by treaty. The rules are a little different for them. I wish they would exercise them. Actually, I think it is allowed to divide itself into 6 states which would give it 12 senators. I say divide! Dethrone Harry Reid and give Obama some much needed opposition.

bopbottle on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

That’s the only special treatment Texas retains. It lost the other when the south lost the war.

But what a terrible idea. The feds would get involved to such a point that at least two of those states would be blue. And then all those states would just be ordinary states, like all the others…

cozmo on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

There’s no reason I can think of, aside from pure showmanship, to pass a resolution formally asserting their Tenth Amendment rights; if they’re serious about challenging The One on that ground, they could just pick some federal statute and sue. They’d almost certainly lose . . . .

You answered your own question, Allah. They’d lose a battle in federal court to challenge the overreach of the federal government. Hmm, wonder why that is?

No, Texas has this exactly right. The only check on the federal government–and all three of its ugly, distorted, overgrown branches–is the States themselves. The people may attempt to raise a commotion through tea parties or whatever, and I would encourage such political expression, but the federal constitution is at its heart an agreement between the States which has been trampled upon by the powers that be.

Let the States take their sovereignty back–raise up the Tenth Amendment (even though it’s somewhat superfluous), repeal the two populist amendments of 1913 (income tax; direct election of senators), and stop applying the Bill of Rights against the States based upon an expansive and illiterate interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Perhaps N.C. can join Texas? One can dream, at least.

cackcon on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

Powers, not rights.

Anyone who speaks of “states’ rights” isn’t just misusing terminology — he’s buying into a whole sordid history.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on April 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM

The states have powers, the the people of the states (which make up the state) have rights.
So from a legal definition, the states, as representatives of the peoples have rights. Which is why states often “speak for the people” and demand their rights.
The states as a government have powers.
You are nitpicking, where you really did understand that the state functions as two entities…right?

One as a government, and the other as a representative of the people.

right2bright on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

What could go wrong?

Well for starters, they could all be imprisoned, tortured and killed.

It’s happened a hundred times before, in a hundred different countries. Why not here?

The left now controls the Army and what do we have, a piece of paper? Yeah, that’s always worked so well in the past.

logis on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

If it weren’t for all the damn illegals, I’d move to Texas.

csdeven on April 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM

I don’t follow Texas politics. Here in Chicago, we have our hands full. Does Perry have what it takes to make it to the Presidency? What is the overall opinion of him in the state?

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Did very well during Hurricane Rita in ’05; took command and contrasted nicely to Gov. Blanco.
However, when he was campaigning for re-election he took a strong stance on illegal immigration. Once re-elected, he backed way down from his stance.
But on this affirmation of the state sovereignty, he is dead on.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM

sherry,
If Perry would go hog wild on illegals, he would probably do good. As for dear kay, no vote for her.
L

letget on April 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM

Perhaps N.C. can join Texas? One can dream, at least.

cackcon on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

Amen, but not after this election…

right2bright on April 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM

My conservative Texas friend swears Perry is all hat and no cattle. He may be better than Kay Bailey, but I would watch out before getting too excited about him on a national level, we may be walking straight into another McCain.

AdrianG on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Yes, your friend is right on. I have never trusted Perry. His taking a stand on this issue is about the best thing he has ever done, IMHO.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Aggie85 on April 14, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Thanks, it will be interesting to see who truly can emerge as the front runner when the time comes, although it feels like we are in eternal election mode.

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM

The left now controls the Army and what do we have, a piece of paper? Yeah, that’s always worked so well in the past.

logis on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

I think you sell the Army short there, Logis.

That “piece of paper” is exactly what anyone in the military has sworn to defend and ally themselves to. Most – if not all – mean that with all their heart, mind, body, and soul.

This is not yet Nazi Germany. U.S. soldiers are not going to take orders against American civilians too soon.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Oh this is a pretty sight. Thanks for posting it for us.

canditaylor68 on April 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM

I <3 TX.

vsunited on April 14, 2009 at 4:32 PM

If it weren’t for all the damn illegals, I’d move to Texas.

csdeven on April 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM

I work in the thick of illegal immigrants. I will say that it has taken some time to get used to it. The signs here are all in Spanish and the buildings are brightly painted. You would think you were in a border town driving down the street seeing all the taquerías and Mexican-themed supermarkets. Our federal and state governments have failed us by not securing the border and getting tough on illegal immigration. The food is great but the landscape has really become foreign, over night it seems.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:33 PM

“Adios, MOFO!”

-actual quote from my governor, Rick Perry.

Proud of you (today), Governor. Keep it up.

Matticus Finch on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

Remember when Bob Dole said he carried around a copy of the 10th Amendment in his wallet during the 96 debates? I am sure that this dynamite “Hey, remember the 10th Amendment?” strategy will propel Perry all the way to the top!

Proud Rino on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

It must be election season in Texas. Guv Goodhair is talking like a conservative again.

Fletch54 on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

Just like it did with Senator Dole.

Proud Rino on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

If it weren’t for all the…illegals, I’d move to Texas.

You have none there? You must be in Bangor, Maine.

jgapinoy on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

right2bright on April 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM

I’m not nitpicking at all. It’s an important difference. The Tenth Amendment is a part of the constitutional scheme to protect individual liberties by limiting the scope of the federal government. It does this by saying “we really mean it” when article I, section 8 limits congressional powers. So far, we’re in total agreement. But this arrangement works through assignment of governmental powers. Powers, not rights. My state doesn’t possess my rights. It doesn’t speak for me. But I have a stake in self-government at the state level, which helps protect my rights. Those rights are mine, not my state’s. Bottom line: If you’re going to speak of “states’ rights,” with all of its terrible baggage, you’re going to marginalize yourself in a second.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on April 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Thanks letget and carbon. I found some of his remarks on immigration on his homepage. Sounds like he waffles and rides the fence but I will read them in depth later.

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Texas joined the Union by treaty. The rules are a little different for them. I wish they would exercise them. Actually, I think it is allowed to divide itself into 6 states which would give it 12 senators. I say divide! Dethrone Harry Reid and give Obama some much needed opposition.

bopbottle on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

I say secede.

bopbottle on April 14, 2009 at 4:19 PM

That is bit murky since 1865 – that whole defeated in war and surrendering deal. I’m a Texan and that is hard to admit -but it lost because it needed to lose that one.

In other news – we are a different nation now (both Texas – and America too…) our mindset it different than it was then – not to mention the whole situation.
Secession is not really possible right now – but outrage, dissension, and flat-out protests are not!

I want to see Texas leading the way to a better America – not just a better Texas.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM

What would it take for Texas to secede? Seriously.

The US Federal Government is on the road to ruin. Looking objectively at the numbers, it will soon be a lost cause.

Why shouldn’t believers in limited government pick a couple states and secede?

toliver on April 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM

I’ve been here since 1964, and the southern part of Cook County is just as big a shithole as Chicago.

Jaibones on April 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM

Waving from the south burbs and the shabby chic projects of Park Forest!

Kind of off topic but not really, has anyone paid any attention to the 3 Chicago suburbs i.e. Palatine, Hanover Park and Barrington who voted successfully to succeed from Cook County IL?

Knucklehead on April 14, 2009 at 4:37 PM

This is not yet Nazi Germany. U.S. soldiers are not going to take orders against American civilians too soon.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:29 PM

During the aftermath of Katrina, members of the National Guard, along with local police forces, disarmed law abiding citizens, in their own homes.

Please see the

Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-5013

Never think that tyranny can’t happen here. Such thinking is the foundation for that very event.

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM

What would it take for Texas to secede? Seriously.

The US Federal Government is on the road to ruin. Looking objectively at the numbers, it will soon be a lost cause.

Why shouldn’t believers in limited government pick a couple states and secede?

toliver on April 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Well – an actual majority of the population to want it would help. Then, they’d have to have a will to do so despite the considerable objection of the federal government to their doing so. Texas has a lot of land, resources, folks, and plenty of federal property down there in its lovely environs. They’d want it back, or better yet, not want to lose it in the first place.

Nobody gets out of the Union quietly. Can’t simply vote and say, “We’ve changed our minds and are quits.” No throwing poop on their shoes and saying “I break with thee.”

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM

He’s an awful speaker, but this is a nice move.

DaveS on April 14, 2009 at 4:41 PM

sherry on April 14, 2009 at 4:36 PM

You’re welcome.
Just check out this google search and scroll through the links. He vacillates.
Although, it appears that more recently he is very strong against illegal immigration.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Yes, and I don’t know if your link provided the fact that those seized weapons were not returned to the owners.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Those were men following lawful orders in a situation of emergency weren’t they?

Not soldiers told to simply wipe out innocent civilians in defense of their homes. Yes, one day – that is most likely going to happen. It will take a bit more than a liberal bent in politics and the media to get that to happen. At least in the next couple of years. Granted, I admit I slide to your way of thinking, but this is still a land of law – at least today.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Even blind squirrels find acorns sometimes, but I’m with Gov. Goodhair on this one. He can be trusted to talk the talk until after his re-election. Sadly, I will be stuck voting for him because he is not Hutchison or Friedman (yes, Kinky’s running again.) Trust me, we don’t want Perry in national politics.

obladioblada on April 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Well – an actual majority of the population to want it would help. Then, they’d have to have a will to do so despite the considerable objection of the federal government to their doing so. Texas has a lot of land, resources, folks, and plenty of federal property down there in its lovely environs. They’d want it back, or better yet, not want to lose it in the first place.

Nobody gets out of the Union quietly. Can’t simply vote and say, “We’ve changed our minds and are quits.” No throwing poop on their shoes and saying “I break with thee.”

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:40 PM

The votes are easy. Conservative/libertarian types can move to Texas for that reason. Our ancestors decided to pick and move to make something new and better, so why can’t we?

The Federal Debt and government is growing like a cancer. I want no part of it, and I’m not alone.

toliver on April 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM

Sorry Texas, you’re late. Indiana did this yesterday.

Notorious GOP on April 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM

I’m moving to Texas!!

Sxyrzrbck on April 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Trust me, we don’t want Perry in national politics.

True dat. But we can be proud of him today. Dang Kinky Friedman needs another shot of attention.

Matticus Finch on April 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM

I love it… Maybe I will move back to Texas and leave Illinois behind.

BoomJunkie on April 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM

IS Perry stepping up?

Does anyone care???

tarpon on April 14, 2009 at 4:48 PM

There is a photo of a German soldier firing on a woman protecting her baby – circa WWII – after his commander told him to do it.
I honestly don’t believe we’ve reached a level where the majority of American military folks would follow the order the same way. I believe that commander would be shot himself by his men rather than do that.
Do I believe such things are possible among Americans? Of course, we are all people (and sinners by nature) but I don’t believe we have gotten there yet.
However, it does not look like we are avoiding that eventuality though.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:48 PM

Sorry Texas, you’re late. Indiana did this yesterday.

Notorious GOP on April 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM

N GOP? We did? I’ve been so busy defending the Mother Land that I have not heard about it. (I’m here in lovely Purdue – so there would not be much said anyway…laugh)

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:49 PM

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Those were men following lawful orders in a situation of emergency weren’t they?

Not soldiers told to simply wipe out innocent civilians in defense of their homes. Yes, one day – that is most likely going to happen. It will take a bit more than a liberal bent in politics and the media to get that to happen. At least in the next couple of years. Granted, I admit I slide to your way of thinking, but this is still a land of law – at least today.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

By “lawful orders,” do you mean orders in contravention of the 2nd and 4th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America?

Inasmuch as you, apparently, didn’t read the Act, cited by me, I’ll post appropriate “FINDINGS” here:

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that a `well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed’, and Congress has repeatedly recognized this language as protecting an individual right.

(2) In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, State and local law enforcement and public safety service organizations were overwhelmed and could not fulfill the safety needs of the citizens of the State of Louisiana.

(3) In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, the safety of these citizens, and of their homes and property, was threatened by instances of criminal activity.

(4) Many of these citizens lawfully kept firearms for the safety of themselves, their loved ones, their businesses, and their property, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment, and used their firearms, individually or in concert with their neighbors, for protection against crime.

(5) In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, certain agencies confiscated the firearms of these citizens in contravention of the Second Amendment, depriving these citizens of the right to keep and bear arms and rendering them helpless against criminal activity.

(6) These confiscations were carried out at gunpoint by nonconsensual entries into private homes, by traffic checkpoints, by stoppage of boats, and otherwise by force.

(7) The citizens from whom firearms were confiscated were either in their own homes or attempting to flee the flooding and devastation by means of motor vehicle or boat, and were accosted, stopped, and arbitrarily deprived of their private property and means of protection.

(8) The means by which the confiscations were carried out, which included intrusion into the home, temporary detention of persons, and seizures of property, constituted unreasonable searches and seizures and deprived these citizens of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of fundamental rights under the Constitution.

(9) Many citizens who took temporary refuge in emergency housing were prohibited from storing firearms on the premises, and were thus treated as second-class citizens who had forfeited their constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

(10) At least one highly-qualified search and rescue team was prevented from joining in relief efforts because the team included individuals with firearms, although these individuals had been deputized as Federal law enforcement officers.

(11) These confiscations and prohibitions, and the means by which they were carried out, deprived the citizens of Louisiana not only of their right to keep and bear arms, but also of their rights to personal security, personal liberty, and private property, all in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

To hell with the carrying out of “orders.” SS officers were carrying out orders at Auschwitz, too.

OhEssYouCowboys on April 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM

My conservative Texas friend swears Perry is all hat and no cattle. He may be better than Kay Bailey, but I would watch out before getting too excited about him on a national level, we may be walking straight into another McCain.

AdrianG on April 14, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Yes, your friend is right on. I have never trusted Perry. His taking a stand on this issue is about the best thing he has ever done, IMHO.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Another Texan in total agreement with that. He was the one who wanted to make the HPV vaccination mandatory for 6th grade girls. That is NOT my idea of a conservative~

http://tinyurl.com/cno3g7

kg598301 on April 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Dear Texas,

Please save a lovely piece of land for me. I’ll be there in about three years.

Thanks in Advance.

Dubn8tr on April 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Now that Gov. Perry has invoked the 10th Amendment, what is next?

Sxyrzrbck on April 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM

toliver on April 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM

You are missing the point – the votes are indeed the easy part.

It is that whole stand up and fight when the federal government would rather you did not break off the lovely relationship you all were having.

I honestly don’t think the majority of Americans are up for that kind of fight at this time. Nor, would it be necessary if we’d stand up and VOTE – or at least pay attention occasionally to what’s going on.

kybowexar on April 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM

I’m afraid Governor Haircut is up to his old tricks. Sort of like during the last election when he dressed up like the Marlboro man and spoke of protecting our borders. Then he gets elected and runs away from any talk of The Fence or protecting our borders. Now that Kay Barely Republican is nipping at his heels, he has to do something to move back to the right…

golfer1 on April 14, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Notice he did not use a teleprompter…is he elbowing Palin?

d1carter on April 14, 2009 at 4:54 PM

what about the “Old Free State” of Lunenburg Co, Virginia. This county seceded from the Union ahead of Virginia. We claim that we were therefore a separate entity & were never brought back into the Union in 1865.

but we still pay our taxes. (did you hear me, tiny tim?)

kelley in virginia on April 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM

I’m going to go to Texas Chamber of Commerce site tonight just to snoop around. One day I might decide to move to a state where they stand up for what’s right.

Oink on April 14, 2009 at 4:56 PM

“Adios, MOFO!”

-actual quote from my governor, Rick Perry.

Proud of you (today), Governor. Keep it up.

Matticus Finch on April 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM

Although not a big fan of his I have to admit, that WAS pretty doggone funny.

kg598301 on April 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM

Another Texan in total agreement with that. He was the one who wanted to make the HPV vaccination mandatory for 6th grade girls. That is NOT my idea of a conservative~

http://tinyurl.com/cno3g7

kg598301 on April 14, 2009 at 4:50 PM

I had forgotten about that! That was his absolute worst moment.

carbon_footprint on April 14, 2009 at 4:58 PM

There’s a 10th amendment? really? Wow, what’s it about?

E9RET on April 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Comment pages: 1 2