GM prepares bankruptcy filing, with $70B taxpayer pricetag
posted at 5:05 pm on April 14, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Two weeks ago, reports had Barack Obama leaning towards bankruptcy for GM as a solution to their problem — after soaking taxpayers for $14 billion just a few months earlier. Today, the New York Times reports that GM has prepared a “surgical” bankruptcy, apparently hoping for a debt-ectomy. Don’t worry about the waste, though, because the taxpayers will receive a transplant of all the cancerous liabilities that crashed the automaker, and it’s the government pushing that solution:
The Treasury Department is directing General Motors to lay the groundwork for a bankruptcy filing by a June 1 deadline, despite G.M.’s public contention that it could still reorganize outside court, people with knowledge of the plans said during the weekend.
Members of President Obama’s automotive task force spent last week in meetings and on conference calls with G.M. officials and its advisers in Detroit and Washington. Those talks are expected to continue this week.
The goal is to prepare for a fast “surgical” bankruptcy, the people who had been briefed on the plans said. G.M., which has been granted $13.4 billion in federal aid, insists that a quick restructuring is necessary so its image and sales are not damaged permanently.
But pay attention to the actual “surgery”:
One plan under consideration would create a new company that would buy the “good” assets of G.M. almost immediately after the carmaker files for bankruptcy.
Less desirable assets, including unwanted brands, factories and health care obligations, would be left in the old company, which could be liquidated over several years.
Treasury officials are examining one potential outcome in which the “good G.M.” enters and exits bankruptcy protection in as little as two weeks, using $5 billion to $7 billion in federal financing, a person who had been briefed on the prospect said last week.
The rest of G.M. may require as much as $70 billion in government financing, and possibly more to resolve the health care obligations and the liquidation of the factories, according to legal experts and federal officials.
Basically, this is a shell game. GM’s investors get to buy up all the good assets, while dumping the rest into the corpse of GM. Once that happens, the taxpayers will be on the hook for those toxic liabilities, adding another $70 billion or more to our existing entitlement liabilities, only on the terms of the pensions negotiated privately. Even getting off the hook will gain GM’s investors an extra $7 billion in taxpayer cash.
Sweet deal … for them. For each American family, that will cost $1000, or a good down payment on a car.
I suspected that any real resolution to this would require restructuring of GM’s pension obligations. I didn’t expect that we would have to completely underwrite them. That’s absurd. We’d be better off allowing GM to fail on normal bankruptcy terms. Will even a healthy GM add back $77 billion back into taxpayer pockets, let alone cover the $14 billion they’ve already wasted?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Obama admin = Worst hedge fund evah!!
nolapol on April 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM
And another 1m+ cars being recalled for engine fires.
Oh yeah – GM is worth saving.
F-ck me !!!!
jake-the-goose on April 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM
Good cop, bad copGood GM, bad GMWhat a rip-off.
batter on April 14, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Still banging my head.
I’m glad total idiots are in charge.
Really glad.
blatantblue on April 14, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Australia’s looking better and better these days…
leetpriest on April 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM
You had better get a helmet.
thomasaur on April 14, 2009 at 5:11 PM
This is essentially the same solution as the “bad bank” idea.
Smart power.
Otis B on April 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM
We would.
The UAW would not.
Karl on April 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Winner!
batter on April 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM
But how does this help GM sell cars? It doesn’t change the fact that not enough cars are being sold to support the dealerships. Who cares if GM survives as a legal entity if the dealerships close.
keep the change on April 14, 2009 at 5:13 PM
Umm… isn’t it illegal to transfer all the “good” assets to one company while leaving all the obligations in the original company which it then can not fullfil?
Sounds pretty shady to me.
Sackett on April 14, 2009 at 5:13 PM
The UAW has demonstrated its determination to avoid any concessions. They hold the whip hand and we WILL end up paying the bill.
Now my 401(k), by comparison, should be absorbed by the government to help pay for their pensions.
Where do I find a bigger mattress?
wtis02575 on April 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Oh it’s way past that.
I’m on the brink of giving myself a home made lobotomy.
blatantblue on April 14, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Maybe I’ve missed something since bobo took over at GM, but have we heard anything about the UAW doing any re-structuring?
pcpower1 on April 14, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Let’s see if I’ve got this straight…I have already lost about 40% of everything the big guy and I had saved for and set aside for our retirement (we have never believed Soc Security was gonna pay more than a pittance), and now we are gonna be on the hook for the pension benefits and premium medical care for all those union workers at what will be the “bad” part of GM. OOoookay…It never occurred to me before, but where’s my bailout?
This is gonna be a real TEA party, I tell ya.
marybel on April 14, 2009 at 5:17 PM
It is already the law. See PGC. We the tax payers will subsidize the pensions.
I am guessing that Obama will cut a deal with the unions that will force taxpayers to cover health care while the unions allow bankruptcy to happen.
WashJeff on April 14, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Investigate the UAW for violating RICO statutes.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on April 14, 2009 at 5:18 PM
How many ‘free’ cars do I get with that bill?
Greg Toombs on April 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM
I have a hunch that the Tea Parties may be the warm-up act for a revolution.
pcpower1 on April 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM
That’s what fascism is. (part, anyway) Privatizing the profits, nationalizing the losses. Companies are allowed to stay in business as long as they play by the govt’s rules, and in return, the friends of govt get fat and happy, with none of the risks of the business venture.
bikermailman on April 14, 2009 at 5:21 PM
King Hussein Obama’s at it again.
Mojave Mark on April 14, 2009 at 5:21 PM
I’d rather have a bottle in front of me
than have to have a frontal lobotomy.
Disturb the Universe on April 14, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Or if you’re on the Left, it’s an Obamabotomy.
bikermailman on April 14, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Definition: removing your own prefrontal cortex and pledging your allegiance to The One.
bikermailman on April 14, 2009 at 5:23 PM
@#$%!
CP on April 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM
The insanity continues. When will we be rid of this guy? Too bad we will be stuck with taxes to pay for his spending for generations to come.
matthew26 on April 14, 2009 at 5:28 PM
The unions wouldn’t stand for it, neither would the democrat party. In their lingo: Pay up, suckers.
Vashta.Nerada on April 14, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Does an oil can of Foster’s count?
blatantblue on April 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM
Aren’t there laws governing these procedures and why aren’t they being followed.
Cindy Munford on April 14, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Seriously. Do you really want one….?
anniekc on April 14, 2009 at 5:35 PM
It will be $200B before it’s over (20% of one year’s income taxes for the entire country)
notagool on April 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM
It’s not illegal if you’ve got a deep-pocket sucker to buy up the bad company and make good on all its obligations. In this case, that sucker is the U.S. taxpayer.
And “shady” doesn’t even begin to describe it.
AZCoyote on April 14, 2009 at 5:44 PM
Ok,…. so there will be a NEW Company, with NEW stockholders… so, those who invest in the new company make money, while old stockholders loose out on EVERYTHING?
Shades of United Airlines… I lost THOUSANDS on that one… while the company still flies… and someone else owns the assets I helped buy in the first place.
Romeo13 on April 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM
The problem is that Obama has to pay of the unions , otherwise it would be easy to save the good parts of GM.
the_nile on April 14, 2009 at 5:50 PM
Team Jesus is trying to protect the UAW. I say let them eat cake!! This TARP thing is like a loose tire passing the car it came off of.. only going to pick up speed.
Dire Straits on April 14, 2009 at 5:52 PM
Like the voting laws and the campaign contribution laws, they are not always applicable.
/sarc
califcon on April 14, 2009 at 5:55 PM
bought a Toyota last month. Never been so glad to buy “foreign” in my life…
The Chevy I had before was okay, but man, the service was just awful.
mjk on April 14, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Were also paying a bunch through AIG to foreign banks. Wall Street owns Washington.
True_King on April 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM
The Obama administration is literally making up the rules, while contravening the laws, as they proceed with the agenda. We get to sit by and watch with what seems to be little recourse to stop the flow of dollars being used to pay off voting groups.
Yoop on April 14, 2009 at 6:06 PM
To Clarify:
“Company privately creates shell corporations to dump its bad debt into so as to make its balance sheet look better”
= ENRON
“Company with government support creates shell corporations to dump its bad debt into so as to make its balance sheet look better”
= Hope and Change
Just so I’ve got it straight.
sweetlipsbutterhoney on April 14, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Proof positive Bama and cadre have absolutely no business sense or an inkling of their fiduciary duty to taxpayers.
We are soooooo screwed.
The new GM will fail too, with this group of savants designing the cars for them.
I have been a car nut for almost 45 years, and the only interesting car to come out of a state-owned auto business was the Trabant, from East Germany. It was interesting because it was so hopelessly inept in every way you could look at it for days and wonder “what in the hell were they thinking?”.
Now Skoda, in CZ, survived state ownership and actually now is mildly competitive on the World Rally Cup circuit.
Harry Schell on April 14, 2009 at 6:16 PM
I live in Tennessee not too far from Spring Hill (remember the Saturn plant?). These UAW guys are NUTS!! The bass boats, ATV’s, new homes, etc. are all in jeopordy. They voted in line for Oblama. The UMW keeps telling them to push the Congressman to vote for GM! (Whatever that means). I’m scared. I have purchased some new easily convertible auto weapons and have a source for ammunition, really, I’m worried about what’s happening here.
hip shot on April 14, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Love it: we pay another $70B (probably more) for the crumbs of a bankrupt company. The Obama administration has to GTF out of the way and let a real bankruptcy process take place that forces union capitulation. Enough already.
redfoxbluestate on April 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM
The union wins, the tax payer loses another one.
The big loser will be the GM, builders of the world’’s next Volga. No one will by a GM now. Can you imagine the resale.
tarpon on April 14, 2009 at 6:35 PM
DON’T BUY HOPE & CHANGE OR GM
izoneguy on April 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Pity the poor toxic retiree or the toxic disabled worker.
unclesmrgol on April 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Where are the trolls?
Knucklehead on April 14, 2009 at 6:53 PM
FIFY
nolapol on April 14, 2009 at 6:53 PM
GM needs to thin dealership ranks, according to LA Times
They’re prepping us.
unclesmrgol on April 14, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Let GM go bankrupt as a single company, screw the UAW, and let it rise from its ashes, then sink or swim.
But leave ME and MY (tax) MONEY out of it!
Save taxes and American jobs–buy a Ford, Toyota, or Honda.
Steve Z on April 14, 2009 at 7:21 PM
OK, of course this is completely illegal. But I guess it’s just a waste of breath to even mention that sort of thing anymore.
logis on April 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM
They never show up when it’s so “over the top” obvious Barry is breaking it off in us. Even they know when a good f&^king is coming down the pike.
Tim Zank on April 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM
I’m so glad the government invested billions in order to prevent .. what they would later .. demand … my head hurts.
Stickeehands on April 14, 2009 at 8:14 PM
Will even a healthy GM add back $77 billion back into taxpayer pockets, let alone cover the $14 billion
they’vethe clueless and shortsighted Obama administration already wasted? on it.Basilsbest on April 14, 2009 at 8:44 PM
There are two differences between this and Enron. First, in the case of Enron, we had a choice to not buy the stock, wheras with GM and tax dollars, we are forced to buy. Secondly, in the case of Enron, those who spun off the bad assets into separate companies went to jail.
Vashta.Nerada on April 14, 2009 at 9:56 PM
Does it bother anyone else that Hannity talks about principles, complains about government bailouts and advertises for GM?
shick on April 14, 2009 at 10:23 PM
Both my vehicles are currently Fords. They hold their own. My litter beater 97 Ranger has 125k miles on it.
shick on April 14, 2009 at 10:25 PM
Some days, you’re naiive. Getting us to pay for those pension obligations was part of the plan all along.
We would, but the Democrats wouldn’t. After all, they stand to get hundreds of millions from the UAW, money that would not roll in if GM went the normal bankruptcy route.
steveegg on April 15, 2009 at 7:57 AM
THis plan allows GM to avoid changing any union contracts, which is the heart of the problem.
They are just kicking the can down the road.
MarkTheGreat on April 15, 2009 at 8:34 AM
You’re joking, right.
These are Democrats that we are talking about after all.
MarkTheGreat on April 15, 2009 at 8:37 AM
Comment pages: