Amateur. Amateur housewives. Amateur incest family porn. Amateur sex. Amateur homemade videos….

Abortionists are so half-witted it’s sad.

The back ally abortion is a myth.

If abortionists are “half-witted”, what does that make you?

Does life magically begin at birth? If not, then all abortion is murder. If not, life begins at conception.

Around a fifth of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. Is heaven filled with unborn souls?

And why aren’t we talking about serious issues like the grinding oppression of women in Islamic countries, instead of condemning China’s ecological necessity to reduce its birthrate?

I see. At what stage of the pregnancy would that charge hold?

Obviously, at any stage. “Pregnancy” means “carrying”, so the assumption here is that the mother is carrying a child.

Give an example of the “psychological” exceptions you wouldn’t allow. Also, what about rape or incest?

ckoeber on April 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Better, why don’t you give a list of the psychological exceptions you would allow, and let us shoot at them. Ditto for rape and incest.

Why expempt rape and incest? If it’s infanticide then what do the father’s prior misdeeds have to do with the ethics of killing the baby?

Gaunilon on April 12, 2009 at 12:25 AM

Those are the types of cases most often cited in support of abortion — that the mother really had no choice.

I’m in agreement with your comment, but I doubt the rest of the electorate will ever go there.

Their “seamless garb” has been severely rent by this recantation of choice for gender selection.

It takes quite a bit of money to have the DNA testing needed to determine the sex of the child in the womb, and abortions for gender selection can only be performed if the sex of the child is known. Ultrasound can’t tell you — it cannot tell you definitively that a child is female. So the working class and peasantry wait until birth and then, if the child isn’t the right sex, they do the exposure thing, AKA post-natal abortion.

If “Every Child A Wanted Child” is the mantra of these folk, then they must certainly agree with Obama’s support for “oops, I dropped the fetus on the floor” kinds of abortions.

Why expempt rape and incest? If it’s infanticide then what do the father’s prior misdeeds have to do with the ethics of killing the baby?

That argument says a lot about a lot of things.

1. Aren’t we at all worried about living in a culture where a woman so deeply hates her own child that she’d ram a hanger into it’s still growing body in an effort to murder it? Is adoption really that out of the question for you selfish women?

2. Are we so depraved in our culture now that we’re arguing against abortion simply because, hell- we need a quicker and safer way to kill babies growing in our wombs!?? Hangers out, suction tubs sucking out the babies brain- in!

When we kill millions of babies every year because we’re too stupid to, ya know, abstain from sex (it’s called self control, and apparently a lot of women do not have it!), and the argument from the pro-abortion side is that we don’t want to put women’s health at risk in the way we kill the babies- we’re doomed as a culture.

Since an abortion doctor kills the baby, and is hired by the mother. Murder charge against the doctor, and accessory to murder against the mother (same as hiring a hitman).

I see. At what stage of the pregnancy would that charge hold?

Yes, for the life of the mother (such as ectopic pregnancy). “Psychological” exceptions are not valid since they are easily made up.

Give an example of the “psychological” exceptions you wouldn’t allow. Also, what about rape or incest?

ckoeber on April 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM

Should abortion be outlawed here in the States

Yes.

if so what would be the penalty for committing abortion?

Since an abortion doctor kills the baby, and is hired by the mother. Murder charge against the doctor, and accessory to murder against the mother (same as hiring a hitman).

Will there be any exceptions, in your eyes?

Yes, for the life of the mother (such as ectopic pregnancy). “Psychological” exceptions are not valid since they are easily made up.

Let me ask a question here that I do not often here asked.

Should abortion be outlawed here in the States and if so what would be the penalty for committing abortion? Will there be any exceptions, in your eyes?

Also, for some reason, I kept abbreviating CRR as CPR, which I’ve corrected.

Not to nit pic but you did miss one “CPR” in your opening paragraph. ;-) You know I had to say something!

LL

Also, for some reason, I kept abbreviating CRR as CPR, which I’ve corrected.

Except in the fourth sentence:

However, CPR also opposes gender-selective abortion, which is astoundingly hypocritical (emphases mine):

CRR promotes death, CPR promotes life.

The charge of hypocricy never bothers the left. They seem to relish it.

Christian Conservative on April 11, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Of course. Morals are what distinguish humans from animals, you see. If that bothered them even one bit, they’d have to talk to their veterinarian.

I’ve read that stopping the Euphrates is now feasible thanks to a number of hydro-electric plants.

Maybe they are radical feminists who think men are evil, so it’s OK to kill male babies.

zmdavid on April 11, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Maybe..maybe…

They don’t object to abortion, unless the woman chooses to abort in order to avoid giving birth to a female. But how is that choice any less legitimate than any other reason to procure an abortion?

I can’t speak for the CRR, but it would seem the distinction is that they oppose the result of the act, and not the act itself, of gender-selective abortions. The Chinese, the CRR (probably) believe, are misogynists, and the way to fix that is to return the ratio of XX to XY chromosomes to normal levels.

Moesart on April 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Good job, soldier, you hit all the talking points.

If a father kills his children it’s murder. If a mother kills her children it’s “choice.”

God help us.

Mojave Mark on April 11, 2009 at 12:27 PM

+1