Obamateurism of the Day (Updated)
posted at 8:05 am on April 9, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
What happens when a president has such an obsequious media following that he can’t legitimately complain about being held accountable for his actions? He generates fantasy harassment for fun anecdotes to fawning audiences. In this case, Barack Obama told an audience in Turkey that he has to remind the White House press corps that he’s actually not the Messiah:
“So words are good and understanding is good, but ultimately it has to translate into concrete actions. And it takes time. I was just talking to my press team and they were amused because some of my reporter friends from the States were asking, how come you didn’t solve everything on this trip? They said, well, you know, it’s only been a week.”
Oh, that adoring White House press corps! They expect so much, but a Lightworker’s gotta have some time to set the world straight! Too bad the actual White House press corps doesn’t actually ask questions like this. According to Jake Tapper’s Twitter feed during the speech, no one in the press corps asked the dumb question Obama attributed to them.
Now, Obama’s not the first President to stretch the truth about the treatment that he gets from the press (as Jake noted at the time), but he’s the first to create fantasy anecdotes to modestly claim slightly lower status than a Messiah. He may be the first President to have to resort to fiction to make the press sound tougher on him than they actually are, with a couple of exceptions (like Tapper). Maybe the White House press corps should take a hint and start building more testicular fortitude.
Update: Here’s the actual question from the press corps, and it isn’t at all what Obama suggested:
Q Denis, I understand and I take your point of not lecturing, but listening. What I’m trying to understand in these conversations how the bottom line is altogether different. I mean, I can’t imagine the President saying that a nuclear Iran does not an existential threat. He believes that it is. That’s not a negotiable position. So at some point you have to define that as U.S. policy. Same thing with Guantanamo — he’s going to close it down, but he would like European support to take detainees. The same thing on North Korea — continued pursuit of these missile technologies or nuclear weapons is a big problem; we want help.
On those three issues, am I right in asserting that there are some irreducible minimums to U.S. policy and there is a point where the discussions get down to what the U.S. wants from its allies? And on those three issues, what’s the harvest on this trip?
MR. AXELROD: Well, Major, I don’t pretend to be from a rural area, but I know one thing about harvests is you plant, you cultivate, you harvest. This is a longer process than a week, but you can’t — you have to begin by establishing the parameters of the discussion, by establishing a basis of trust and understanding going forward. The President had some very direct discussions with leaders — the leaders he met with on those and other subjects and came away with a commitment to move these talks forward, some specific commitments that will become clearer later.
But you don’t leave with a bounty on the first — in the first instance. I mean, there were some specific things that were accomplished here at the G20, at NATO, relative to Afghanistan that are tangible and are important. But over time, the seeds that were planted here are going to be very, very valuable for the security and progress of the United States. And one example of that is on the arms question. To restart a conversation with the Russians that had essentially languished is going to be valuable at a time when the nuclear threat is growing. And so there will be a harvest; it will come at different times and in different ways. But the seeds were planted, and that was the goal of this trip.
So they didn’t ask him why he hadn’t solved all of America’s problems in foreign policy in a week. They asked him why he hadn’t managed to show any progress on the three big issues on the American agenda. The press corps did a good job in putting Obama’s feet to the fire, and Obama tried to use it to make himself more One-ish. Lame.
Got an Obamateurism of the Day? If you see a foul-up by Barack Obama, e-mail it to me at obamaisms@edmorrissey.com with the quote and the link to the Obamateurism. I’ll post the best Obamateurisms on a daily basis, depending on how many I receive. Include a link to your blog, and I’ll give some link love as well. And unlike Slate, I promise to end the feature when Barack Obama leaves office.
Illustrations by Chris Muir of Day by Day. Be sure to read the adventures of Sam, Zed, Damon, and Jan every day!
You must be logged in to post a comment.


















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Ed, I’m going to join your morning crew. Seems all the other conservatives are out working at this hour.
Vincenzo on April 9, 2009 at 8:09 AM
‘Nuff said
bikermailman on April 9, 2009 at 8:10 AM
I thought Barry gave UP smoking……
JohnTant on April 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM
The rationale for Obama’s failures will always be that the problems were too many, the expectations too high. There will never be policy failures, never be personal failures — the fault will always be with the citizens for having unrealistic expectations.
BigD on April 9, 2009 at 8:13 AM
So it’s a hormonal thing with the press corps.
AubieJon on April 9, 2009 at 8:13 AM
Just tobacco, not wacky-tobacky.
Q: What’s the difference between Obama and Jesus?
A: Jesus doesn’t think He’s Obama.
rbj on April 9, 2009 at 8:15 AM
The weird part about it is that such a total incompetent is still able to carry this delusion of competence in his own mind. It’s utterly insane … and I mean that in the driest, most clinical sense.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 8:19 AM
Alternate A:
Jesus gave up everything for our sake. BHO doesn’t give a hoot.
jgapinoy on April 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Don’t worry , it’s just the cocaine talking .
the_nile on April 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Isn’t that the “When Hell Freezes Over” tour?
ladyingray on April 9, 2009 at 8:21 AM
Alternative B:
Jesus gave up everything for our sake. We give up everything for BHO’s sake (or his buddy’s).
bikermailman on April 9, 2009 at 8:22 AM
Can’t you just let him alone so he can eat his waffle?
Poor guy. It’s hard being the center of your own attention, after all…
Wanderlust on April 9, 2009 at 8:22 AM
Good CD. (The Eagles)
bikermailman on April 9, 2009 at 8:22 AM
Is it inconceivable Obama was talking to some reporters when Jake Tapper wasn’t around?
This is your item of the day? Must have been a good trip…
e-pirate on April 9, 2009 at 8:24 AM
Studies show (and the evidence bears this out-see below) that hormonal imbalances (particularly deficiencies) run rampant on the left:
Begala, Carville, Maher, Maddow, Napolitano…oh, the list goes on and on.
CarolynM on April 9, 2009 at 8:26 AM
Wrong. It will ALWAYS be Bush’s fault. Barry didn’t get enough chocolate chips in his cookie? Bush’s fault. Barry didn’t know not to bow to the Saudi’s? Bush’s fault. It rains on Easter? Bush’s fault. America realizes they have an idiot in the White House, and long for the previous occupant? Bush’s fault. (hee-hee)
anniekc on April 9, 2009 at 8:26 AM
In the end BHO will prove himself a total lightweight on all fronts!
GFW on April 9, 2009 at 8:27 AM
And of course when Barry finally gets sent packing as the worst president in US history evar… It’ll of course be Bush’s fault… ;)
doriangrey on April 9, 2009 at 8:28 AM
While I enjoy picking on Obama every morning and really, all day long, this Obamateurism wasn’t quite up to par with all the rest.
I don’t see myself voting for it during the weekenend Obamateurism poll.
myrenovations on April 9, 2009 at 8:28 AM
The “Bushisms of the day” were weaker. But like most on the Left, you take things far too seriously.
rbj on April 9, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Nope, he will be seen as a true genuine heavyweight… As in a black-hole heavyweight, sucking everything that comes into his gravitational reach in and utterly destroying it…
doriangrey on April 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM
RBJ, I like your joke.
OT just for a second: It seems the captain of the hijacked ship offered himself as a hostage to save his crew. We have some seriously brave people in our country.
Bishop on April 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM
i knew this feature would turn into a self-parody.
from jake tapper, 2 days ago:
sesquipedalian on April 9, 2009 at 8:32 AM
e-pirate on April 9, 2009 at 8:24 AM
Shouldn’t you be waving your gun at sailors, only to be over-powered?
fluffy on April 9, 2009 at 8:33 AM
Think about it for just a moment: Whether the conversation ever happened at all or it happened in some secret corner of AF1, Ogabe is joking about an image that he has not only created for himself, but one that he embraces and believes, as ignorant and inept as it makes him look.
AubieJon on April 9, 2009 at 8:33 AM
Now, Obama’s not the first President to stretch the truth about the treatment that he gets from the press (as Jake noted at the time), but he’s the first to create fantasy anecdotes to modestly claim slightly lower status than a Messiah.
No politician has ever tried to lower expectations? Really? This is really a low point.
Let’s think about this a moment. What most likely happened was that the press kept asking Gibbs or whoever about all these problems Obama has to face… Israel-Palestine, Iran, Afghanastan, Iraq, etc…
They were probably asking why progress hasn’t been made on all these issues… as the press is wont to do with ANY president. And Team Obama, as many, many politicians have done before, invokes the short amount of time they’ve had to address the issues.
What Obama is doing here is trying to lower expectations — something he’s been trying to do since he’s been elected. What many politicians have done in the past. He’s saying, give us some time.
This has nothing to do with the press thinking Obama is a “messiah.” They ALWAYS ask presidents about progress on big issues. Presidents and politicians always (or at least most of the time) ask for patience.
These days, Ed, everything this you write is filtered through “How can I make Obama look bad” glasses. Maybe some day you’ll begin to think critically again.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM
Hussein the Clown should spend less time making up stories about his adorable press corps and more time doing something about the axis of evil.
I’m sure in his mind, Kim Jong Ill’s missile firing was but a distraction to his World Drool Over Me Tour.
fogw on April 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM
God created the universe in 7 days. What the hell is taking him so long?
sheesh on April 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Don’t you get it?
Obama called some reporters his friends.
Jake Tapper isn’t friends with Obama, so that means Obama stretched the truth.
Game over man
e-pirate on April 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM
You’re a sad little pirate, and I pity you.
AubieJon on April 9, 2009 at 8:39 AM
God created the universe in 7 days. What the hell is taking him so long?
sheesh on April 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM
The universe is now being reordered by Obowa to fit his new mold; it takes time to completely restructure everything.
Bishop on April 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM
True that Bishop.
Americas still f*cking rule and kick f*cking ass.
blatantblue on April 9, 2009 at 8:41 AM
Well, AmericaNs, that is.
blatantblue on April 9, 2009 at 8:41 AM
The press’s job is asking hard questions, putting the president’s feet to the fire on his policies and actions (like they did with Bush non-stop 24/7 for eight years).
It is not their job to applaud him on how clever he is by lowering expectations.
fogw on April 9, 2009 at 8:43 AM
I agree with you. Further, you should go away until Ed begins to think “critically” again. That way you don’t waste your time and ours.
Just looking out for your best interests.
geckomon on April 9, 2009 at 8:44 AM
What Obama is doing here is trying to lower expectations — something he’s been trying to do since he’s been elected. What many politicians have done in the past. He’s saying, give us some time.
Oh bullshiite. This is the same guy who accepted fawning adoration from everyone during the nomination process and campaign, and he had no problems telling those same people that soon after taking office things were going to brighten up considerably.
Now Ogabe is discovering that being POTUS isn’t just about parties and riding AF1, that it takes actual work, and he wants the same whore media to tamp it down. Whatever.
Bishop on April 9, 2009 at 8:44 AM
I guess Bunny Spanker (benny shankar) got tired of that old account and switched to Tom_Shitley
blatantblue on April 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM
I disagree. This example is akin to a .183 hitter talking, seriously, about people being disappointed that he didn’t hit at least two home runs in the last game. It’s beyond laughable.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/just_53_say_capitalism_better_than_socialism
ouch!
blatantblue on April 9, 2009 at 8:47 AM
He’s actually COVERING for the derelict MSM. “I have your crooked back”
marklmail on April 9, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Actually, Ed doesn’t have to write anything filtered to make Obama “look bad”.
Truth is, it comes naturally for Obama to trip over himself at every turn and stutter and mumble and distort his lack of knowledge and experience, especially when it comes to real USA history.
Ed is just reporting the facts as Obama displays his complete ineptitude on a nearly daily basis.
KendraWilder on April 9, 2009 at 8:51 AM
Obama makes up a lot of silly stuff.
AnninCA on April 9, 2009 at 8:51 AM
Well put and quite thoughtful of you to look out for our trolls.
anniekc on April 9, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Tom, do you remember the day when Dear Leader sewed up the Democratic nomination and He proclaimed, in part, “we will look back on this day as when the sea levels began to fall”.
King Canute knew humility. The One (as Oprah called Him and He didn’t dispute) has no humility. We will continue to poke holes at The Obama Image. At least we aren’t saying “Obama is worse than Hitler” as the Left did with Bush.
Thanks, Bishop. I also like the alternatives.
rbj on April 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM
This country is suffering a terrible sickness.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM
His self-depricating humor is twisted. Is this supposed to be translated as “sometimes my perfection will not meet your expectatations”. Who talks like this?
sherry on April 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM
So the fact that Obama couldn’t possibly accomplish everything on this trip is supposed to excuse the fact that he actually accomplished nothing on the trip?
Wow.
AZCoyote on April 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM
whats the difference between jesus and obama?
jesus could build a cabinet (I can’t remember where I stole that from)
no matter how lame an obamateurism of the day is, isn’t the point to just make an example of something stupid so as to lampoon the way lefties lost it over bush?
seaniep on April 9, 2009 at 8:57 AM
I don’t even think this conversation took place. This sounds like a lie to me. Seriously.
sheesh on April 9, 2009 at 9:00 AM
That’s not true. He did manage to give away US sovereignty to the Europeans to control our fianncial industry. And we let the backstabbing French back into the military arm of NATO, so they can really screw us over the next time we need NATO for anything …
That was a nice bit of treason and one of the dumbest diplomatic/security moves of recent memory, so the trip wasn’t a total loss for him. He did a good amount of damage to the US with this little jaunt.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 9:00 AM
I’ve discovered that mocking Obama is soooo much fun, if only to watch his disciples on this site lose their sh*t over what we say. It’s addicting.
Not sure where you heard it, but Andy Levy on RedEye made that comment once….
Yep, and to watch them try to explain every teeny tiny thing away whilst not looking completely insane. They aren’t entirely successful at either.
mjk on April 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM
These days, Ed, everything this you write is filtered through “How can I make Obama look bad” glasses. Maybe some day you’ll begin to think critically again.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2009 at 8:34 AM
What color is the sky in your world? The most pathetic aspect of Obama’s presidency is that NO ONE HAS HAD TO MAKE UP ANYTHING! The man’s an idiot. He’s going to single handedly restore Bush’s reputation!
anniekc on April 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM
Heh. Speaking of dim-bulb amateurism:
Biden Hallucinates about Meetings with Bush
mr.blacksheep on April 9, 2009 at 9:02 AM
I agree with your analogy, but I think my problem with this Obamateurism is that I have, sadly, grown used to his Jesus complex. When he says something like this, it just doesn’t get me the way it used to.
myrenovations on April 9, 2009 at 9:04 AM
From link:
I guess he hasn’t seen those videos of Palestinian children dressed up as suicide bombers nor heard those proud Palestinian mothers celebrating their sons’ martyrdom.
Disturb the Universe on April 9, 2009 at 9:06 AM
Speaking for myself only mind you, that is virtually impossible.
thomasaur on April 9, 2009 at 9:08 AM
That was funny. Biden is definitely dying for attention. President is getting way too much and he wants his share! My favorite part “the president would never tolerate two hours with Joe Biden”. That pretty much sews it up.
sherry on April 9, 2009 at 9:09 AM
Joe Biden making something up? Well I guess that beats plagiarizing.
rbj on April 9, 2009 at 9:13 AM
I hope that you are not trying to say that the press is treating Obama just like they have every other president, because that simply is not true. Even the most liberal folks in the country would not think that was the case, even though they would probably not say it publicly.
Obama has proven that his opposition was saying all along, that he does not have the experience for the job. Will he overcome the learning curve? I don’t know, I tend to think that his arrogance will get in the way and he will make a lot of mistakes, large and small. I just hope that they continue to only embarrass the United States, not doom her.
What I think is that Obama and his crew have pulled one of the best con jobs (hope and change) in the history of America, with the help of the press, and it continues and will continue for the next 4 years.
kam582 on April 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM
A narcissist?
No. That can’t be right.
How about a megalomaniacal narcissist?
Loxodonta on April 9, 2009 at 9:16 AM
Has to be this one. It’s not normal.
I believe Martha Stewart had the same mentality and well, we all know what happened there.
sherry on April 9, 2009 at 9:19 AM
Obama has to accept that an adversarial press is vital to the health and well-being of the nation.
But…seems the press is anything but adversarial. And Obama won’t accept anything…he makes it up as he goes along.
Thus…the Obamatrons will “win.”
[Unless the blogs do the right thing [pun intended] and pick up where the “press’ has abandoned the effort.]
As for Biden…he has taught The Messiah well…
coldwarrior on April 9, 2009 at 9:19 AM
No, it’s obama claiming he was asked those questions that’s “stretching the truth”.
Darth Executor on April 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM
As the story goes, Palestinian women talking to each other often are heard to say, “Oh, these kids, they blow up so fast these days.”
coldwarrior on April 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM
A good watchdog media would have instead asked: “How come you didn’t solve ANYthing on this trip?”
hawksruleva on April 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM
misslizzi on April 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM
Thank God for the internet! Can you imagine what Barry would get away with if we didn’t have it.
anniekc on April 9, 2009 at 9:24 AM
Is Tapper the only self-respecting professional MSM journalist left?
forest on April 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM
Self-appointed dieties talk like that.
hawksruleva on April 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM
As someone who has family members that have personality traits like those of Obama, I know the emotional strain of dealing with this type of person. Here are just a couple of identifiers of what is called a “Malignant Narcissist.”
-All malignant narcissists are cases of arrested development. (malignant narcissists are pathological children)
-The narcissist has a pathological need for all attention in every context he finds himself in.
-This is attached to his transcendent sense of entitlement.
-The malignant narcissist’s pathological need to have it all leads to his existence of being pathologically envious.
-The malignant narcissist is a predatory animal.
-The malignant narcissist is a chameleon.
-All malignant narcissists are parasitical.
-In every situation the parasitical narcissist is preening himself.
-We are only objects to the narcissist.
All these points have further explaination on an informative website called Narcissist’s Suck.
http://narcissists-suck.blogspot.com/
jcheney on April 9, 2009 at 9:26 AM
But sleeping dogs lie.
Loxodonta on April 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM
Whoa! For a sec, I thought you were poopdeck!
geckomon on April 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM
Obama’s narcissism is limitless. I have this annoying mental image of Barry looking into his mirror and singing:
I feel charming
Oh so charming
It’s alarming how charming I feel
And so pretty
That I hardly can believe I’m real
I feel pretty
Oh so pretty
That the city should give me its key
A committee
Should be organized to honor me
I feel dizzy
I feel sunny
I feel fizzy and funny and fine
Because…”I WON!!”
Barb Dwyer on April 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Obama is doing a pretty good job of that himself.
Johan Klaus on April 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Ed, it looks like we may need an EARLY Edition and a LATE edition of Obamatuerisms of the day.
originalpechanga on April 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM
I feel stunning
And entrancing,
Feel like running and dancing some more,
For I’m loved
By a pretty wonderful press corps!
Loxodonta on April 9, 2009 at 9:48 AM
Q: What’s the difference between Obama and Jesus?
A:
Jesus doesn’t think He’s Obama.rbj on April 9, 2009 at 8:15 AM
A: Jesus knows how to build a cabinet.
milwife88 on April 9, 2009 at 9:52 AM
He came away with a “commitment to move these talks forward”–in other words, they agreed to talk to him again?
Wowee! Just words!
Specific commitments that will become clearer later? If they’re so specific, why aren’t they clear? What is unclear about a specific commitment, unless it’s vague, or not really a commitment?
What specific things were accomplished?
How many tangible troops did NATO send to Afghanistan?
We’re still waiting for the rabbit out of the hat. Easter is in three days. By the way, will Obama rebuild the temple?
Steve Z on April 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM
The press corps did a good job in putting Obama’s feet to the fire, and Obama tried to use it to make himself more One-ish. Lame.
So, first you say he’s an amateur because he has to play down the press’ adoration of him, but that wasn’t right. It’s really because he’s playing up his own messianic quality.
Regardless, the answer will always reflect poorly on Obama, right Ed?
It’s the height of irony that you’re accusing Obama of being an amateur. Keep on spinning, Ed…
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Who talks like this? A narcissist. They don’t “get” self-deprication, and when it comes to humor, they just have to fake it, because they have none. I was raised by a narcissist, and the narcissist explanation of “Who Is Obama?” rings truer to my ears than any other.
labwriter on April 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Anyone remember the PSA’s concerning what to do if nukes were being dropped?
Duck, and cover.
Obama remembers.
DannoJyd on April 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM
Just remember, he got NOTHING on his world tour!!!! People I have talked with in Germany particularly are proud of the fact that their Chancellor Angela Merkel gave him NOTHING! They see the superior attitude he is showing towards anyone – because EVERYONE on this earth, all those LITTLE PEOPLE are inferior to HIM! These friends and family members I talked to see this from a different angle than I, after all, I AM an American citizen (I WANTED to be one!) and I see our country going down, down, down. But not because of our previous president and his “cowboy” image, but because they begin to see how empty this suit is. One of my family members actually asked me if Mr. Obama was aware of the facts that a) he was not running for President any longer, but that the election had already happened and he won, and b) that it was unclear why he was campaigning not in the US but in Europe….
mkosin on April 9, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Great will be the fall of King Herod the Obamination!
Grafted on April 9, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Tom is certainly right here that Obama is “trying to lower expectations”, even if he’s doing a poor job of it. We have to remember that Obama basically promised a new style of government in D.C. (if he was elected) and “FREE” education, health care, and “the big one” with his far left anti-war voters, an end to the war in Iraq. His “speading the wealth” promise that came out with his Joe the Plumber moment also resonated with the typical rich vs poor class warfare folks and the “get the corporations” mentality that the left feeds on but are too dumb to realize the amount of revenue generated by our share-holding companies.
Expectations? Obama has had his spoon fed liberal media in a mode of still post election euphoria who dare not expect real solutions to complex problems. Nice strawman Tom—”it’s what many politicians have done in the past”—makes the high bar Obama set to get elected even a bigger reason the media should be hammering him on his accomplishments, which are few. Again, the problem/hypocrisy is, if this was a Republican President that promised so much to get elected, the media would be ripping him apart with little patience or the lame exuse that he needs some time.
Obama’s had enough time to triple the national debt, appease the world while calling his nation arrogant, lowered our defense capabilities, all at the expense of this nation’s sacrifice. TIME’S UP!
Rovin on April 9, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Noooooo. He didn’t “[have] to play down” anything. He chose to use that example, which was incredibly funny, because he is such an inept moron, and everyone knows this … except for him, evidently.
Yes. He had lied in his “example”. It was a fantasy. A tale. A total joke streaming out of the mind of a psychopath with an IQ of 71.
That is what he was doing, unless it is subconscious, and he really thinks that the press said that to him.
That’s what happens with the actions of buffoons. They get themselves coming and going. THis is affirmative action for you, up close and personal. Study it carefully.
He’s really not even up to amateur status. The Precedent is more in the pre-sentient class. The guy doesn’t even have the math skills of the normal 8th grader. LOL. You people are sick, despicable, morons who will go down in history as the most insane group to have inhabited this planet up to now. You will be laughed at by generations, very far into the future.
Now, enjoy the pathetic performance of your affirmative action pick while he sets history for the dumbest national leader ever. The Precedent, indeed.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 10:20 AM
And I wonder why he’s back-pedalling so quickly on his promises and peoples expectations of him? Could it be he promised all sorts of things he has no way of actually delivering (he lied) and being a great orator (teleprompter required) he’s convinced most of his supporters that the fundamental nature of reality will change and a new utopian era of liberalism is about to descend…but knows that at some point they will notice he doesn’t really know what he’s doing.
The amount of incompetence displayed by Obama and his administration is astounding – no wonder he feels compelled to lower expectations as much as possible.
Ed is pointing out how ridiculous it is that a President who is treated with deference by the media has to construct a fantasy that he’s actually being pressed by the media.
gwelf on April 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Ed is pointing out how ridiculous it is that a President who is treated with deference by the media has to construct a fantasy that he’s actually being pressed by the media.
It’s like an ink blot. Everyone at HotAir has a different interpretation as to how this makes Obama look bad.
Tom_Shipley on April 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM
The really funny/sad thing about Oboingo’s trip to Europe is that his “multilateral non-cowboy diplomacy” may result in less support for us in Afghanistan than GWB’s “unilateral, cowboy diplomacy”. I guess being a lickspittle isn’t such a winning tactic after all.
Sucks to be an Obot, I’m sure.
mr.blacksheep on April 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Obama!
Say it loud and there’s music playing,
Say it soft and it’s almost like praying.
Loxodonta on April 9, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Can anybody in this administration give any concrete answers? I mean, Axelrod went along the winding road of the harvest children’s story and did not say anything but talked about seeds that were planted, Holding hid feet to the fire? Why don’t they demand a frigging answer form these guys?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAArrrrrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhh!
TitleofLiberty on April 9, 2009 at 10:28 AM
You shouldn’t talk about your Precedent like that. The official Holder, “Nation of Cowards” rule states that your comment is raaaacist!
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Now they’re actually plagiarizing “Being There”. Oh my.
progressoverpeace on April 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM
It is an ink blot – you always see skittle pooping unicorns.
Sorry our independent thought disturbs you! I guess we need to get our talking points from the same master….
I’m inclined to emphasise Obama’s blunders, lies, and mistakes. You’re inclined to see Obama with rose colored glasses and let anything slide. Do you have any criticism of Obama? It wasn’t hard to find or get conservative criticism of Bush but it seems near impossible to get a liberal to criticise Obama even though he continues many of Bush’s ‘eeeevil/illegal/unconstitutional’ programs, breaks campaign promises while pretending not too (e.g., lobbyists in his administration, rendition, national debt etc).
gwelf on April 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM
He did solve all the problems. We are just too stupid to have realized it.
jukin on April 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM
What a racist thing to say about Dear Leader. What are you, stuck in the ’40’s?
Next you’ll be going all hair-plugist and telling us Biden is such an idiot because all he’s using his brain for is fertilizer for his hair (plugs).
You simply must put aside your hatred and judge Dear Leader and Boo-Boo on the content of their characters.
mr.blacksheep on April 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Reminds me of when Obama was asked what he was thinking around Nov-Dec 2008, when the financial collapse was in progress. He said, something about how he wished he had already been sworn in so he’d be able to do something about it. As if that is the lynchpin to solving our problems … him at the helm? Isn’t that awfully arrogant? Asked about a national crisis, and his answer is all about him.
Paul-Cincy on April 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Chimpy II is a much easier target than Chimpy I, don’t you think?
unclesmrgol on April 9, 2009 at 10:51 AM
I also wonder how people would have reacted had he told us then that in order to fix the financial crisis he would:
* Allow Pelosi/Reid to create a pork laden bill of astronomical proportions that expands government to fund all sorts of liberal pet projects and is in no way sustainable all in the guise of stimulating the economy
* Run up the national debt even further than Bush (who he was criticising for running up the national debt)
* Fire CEOs of companies who had received federal aid
* Hire an incompetent tax cheat to run the Treasury, but not actually staff any other top position at the Treasury
* Raise taxes on most Americans already paying taxes (oops there goes another campaign promise!)
* Stoke populist rage against the executives who are working towards making failed companies viable and able to pay back their obligations to the federal government and had no stake in the decisions that caused the company’s failure (e.g., AIG)
gwelf on April 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »