Strib employees: Help us avoid taxes and make a profit

posted at 11:41 am on April 7, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Give the employees of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune credit for creative thinking.  They’ve launched a website intended to find a buyer for their newspaper that will not shut the doors as the Twin Cities’ biggest newspaper sinks in a sea of red ink.  They also have a new business model in mind, too, one that would certainly set off screeches of class-warfare howling in the Strib’s editorial section if any other corporation tried it:

“With the Star Tribune in bankruptcy, Minnesota?s largest news source is in danger of going dark,” they said in a message on the website, savethestrib.com.

“We, the journalists who write, photograph, edit and present the news every day, are launching this campaign because we believe the Star Tribune is an essential community resource that is too valuable to lose,” they said.

“Our best chance of continuing to provide the breadth and quality of news, opinion, sports and entertainment coverage Minnesotans deserve is to attract a new owner who shares our values and who is ready to lead the Star Tribune into a new age,” they added.

“Help us convince a potential owner that great cities need robust news operations,” they said. “Save The Strib.”

The Strib has the opportunity to save itself, of course, by producing a better product at a lower internal cost.  Much of its local coverage is commendable, but not so much so that the Strib distinguishes itself from its competitor in St. Paul, the Pioneer Press.  It has James Lileks, whom the Strib (to its credit) recognizes as a value-added commodity.  They need a new delivery and monetization model, but failing that, have to start containing costs and make some hard decisions on the scope of coverage for its print edition.

What they do not need is a corporate tax dodge, especially given their populist, class-warfare editorial bent.  But that’s exactly what they’re proposing:

The Newspaper Guild has taken a leading role nationally in exploring ways for communities to invest in their local newspapers and preserve a vital community institution.

Because it’s so obvious the current business model for newspapers doesn’t work, we’ve been proactively investigating alternative ownership and business models that may ensure the Star Tribune will serve the Twin Cities community for many years to come.

These ideas include a low-profit limited liability corporation, the public television/radio model, micropayments, the Green Bay Packers model, non-profit/endowed organizations, employee ownership, and cooperatives.

The Guild is supporting federal legislation in Washington that would include newspapers among businesses that offer a “social benefit” to the community under current Internal Revenue Service rules. This would pave the way for a unique hybrid ownership model called an L3C – a low-profit limited liability corporation – that qualifies as a charity under IRS rules, but is operated as a for-profit business.

The Strib wants to make a profit, and then be exempted from taxation on it.  Perhaps if the Strib started editorializing in favor of the elimination of the corporate tax, then this would seem marginally less hypocritical.  But for a newspaper known for its rantings on soak-the-rich and corporate-fat-cat tax policies … let’s just say that they have no room to demand a change of status to a tax-exempt charity.

Scott Johnson laughs:

Surely there’s a story here somewhere. In the Age of Obama, L3C may just be the next big thing! You too can be a charity case, living on the kindness of strangers. While someone digs out the story, the idea I would like the Newspaper Guild to hear is that Minnesota would be better off without the Star Tribune.

I’d rather see them improve than disappear.  However, I’d rather they disappear than get millions in government tax waivers by claiming to be a charity case.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

They can start by dumping their intrepid editorial staff.

Oh wait, they won’t do that. Wouldn’t be progressive enough for them.

Haven’t read the Red Star Tribune in years. No need to. I have Hot Air.

Blue-eyed Infidel on April 7, 2009 at 11:44 AM

Ask Tim Geithner , use his liberal version of Turbo Tax.

the_nile on April 7, 2009 at 11:44 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

No.

blatantblue on April 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM

With the Star Tribune in bankruptcy, Minnesota’s largest news source is in danger of going dark,” they said

I lived in Mpls for many years and have always been frustrated with this lousy rag and it seems to me, it has only gotten worse. Now they want to eliminate the corporate tax (but not for every business, just for them). Let ‘em eat cake, er bankruptcy. If anyone buys this junk, hope they get it cheap and turn it into an unbiased news source. Now that would be a novelty.

Christian Conservative on April 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM

attract a new owner who shares our values

Therein lies the root of the problem.

TheBigOldDog on April 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM

I noticed the comments section is shut down at http://www.savethestrib.com. Why is that? Could it be that too many people are offering advice on simple changes to the editorial pages and overall reporting that is needed, then the current business model will work.

mngirl on April 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM

Minneapolis Star-Tribune Toilet Paper

Seven Percent Solution on April 7, 2009 at 11:49 AM

They still don’t get it…

d1carter on April 7, 2009 at 11:49 AM

This would pave the way for a unique hybrid ownership model called an L3C – a low-profit limited liability corporation – that qualifies as a charity under IRS rules, but is operated as a for-profit business.

Well, if they get their revenue up a bit, they might qualify as a low-profit enterprise. So far, though, they are not there.

Vashta.Nerada on April 7, 2009 at 11:49 AM

I’d rather see them improve than disappear

……….

Only to once again slide towards partisnaship?

Nope.

Disappear.

artist on April 7, 2009 at 11:50 AM

This would pave the way for a unique hybrid ownership model called an L3C – a low-profit limited liability corporation – that qualifies as a charity under IRS rules, but is operated as a for-profit business.

They already are a charity – for a certain political party.

Vashta.Nerada on April 7, 2009 at 11:51 AM

Print in any form as we know will be gone in 20-30 years.
So get over it.

How many writers still use a pencil or a typewriter?

How many photographers still use film?

How many internet readers still pick up a magazine or newspaper?

izoneguy on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Star Trib employees were handing out fliers before the Twins game last night. I didn’t take one, but I saw they said something about saving the paper and community and blah blah blah.

After the game we walked by where they were standing, and they had just left the extra stacks of fliers laying on the ground, soon to be blown away in the wind and littered across downtown. Thanks guys.

strictnein on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Why have a local newspaper, when there are local TV stations doing the same reporting?

faraway on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Hey I make out a grocery list. Can I declare myself a charity, and get free food?

capejasmine on April 7, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Well it should be obvious the Strib should become an employee owned co-operative. That way the union members preserve their lifetime jobs, and continue to produce the ‘news’ that they love so much.

The unions could adopt a equal pay policy where everyone shares equally in what ever profit or loss their co-operative produces, and of course, the employees would have complete control of the editorial and news coverage. Win-Win for everyone.

What could go wrong?

Skandia Recluse on April 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM

I concur, and in that spirit I demand the same dispensation for my business. Repairing vehicles and mechanical equipment is an essential community resource that is too valuable to lose.

Paying taxes is for suckers.

Bishop on April 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM

Bird owners and fish mongers in Minneapolis are biting their nails over this.

AubieJon on April 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM

The Guild is supporting federal legislation in Washington that would include newspapers among businesses that offer a “social benefit” to the community under current Internal Revenue Service rules.

I’ll be sure to ask the IRS to exempt my business of installing hardwood floors because it’s a “social benefit” for those receiving my services.

Rovin on April 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM

strictnein on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

You should have asked them about the effects on the landfill and GW.

artist on April 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM

What is this strange thing called “Journalist” that you speak of…………?

Seven Percent Solution on April 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Given that the establishment of a free press was designed to give the governed a freedom to voice their views and/or their opinions of the governing body,causing that free press to be dependent on the governing body to ensure a maintenance of profits, is contrary to the spirit of and the meaning of,the afore mentioned “free press”.

oldernwiser on April 7, 2009 at 11:59 AM

The best charities that exists are profitable businesses. As such, all profits should not be taxed.

WashJeff on April 7, 2009 at 12:00 PM

I say SAVE THE TREES!!!! Let the Strib go the way of the dinosaur!

ordi on April 7, 2009 at 12:00 PM

What a joke. Who do they think they are?

By their thinking every business that fails should not pay taxes. Perhaps they should not support Obama since he wants to tax business to death. Morons.

becki51758 on April 7, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Hey Ed! I’ve been meaning to tell you, rent State of Play. It was a BBC 6 part mini series. It’s good enough to watch all in one sitting. The lead female, Kelly MacDonald — it’s worth it just to hear her Scottish accent. It’s so cute. lol It’s about reporters and politicians. They remade it for the US into a movie that will be released in a couple of weeks. There is no way they can improve on the British version which is excellent. The actors are great. Sure, there is a little stereotyping of Americans, but it’s tolerable.

Blake on April 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM

If it were just a corporate tax dodge we could laugh at their hypocrisy. Unfortunately the progressive left think ALL businesses should be run as non-profits. The guild is making it’s move to turn the Strib into a worker owned/managed non-profit. As I recall, several Eastern European countries tried this this after pure socialism failed. The hybrid model failed too but had some advantages over the pure socialist model. This is a a bad precedent and should be opposed. There is already a non-profit newspaper in MN which prints online only, it’s called MinnPost. At least it’s a good test to see if the model is sustainable.

MargaretMN on April 7, 2009 at 12:05 PM

I’ll be sure to ask the IRS to exempt my business of installing hardwood floors because it’s a “social benefit” for those receiving my services.

Rovin on April 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Unless you have Luposlipaphobia.

WashJeff on April 7, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Guess the Strib will learn the hard way, people don’t buy a crap product when they KNOW it’s a crap product.

GarandFan on April 7, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Taxes for thee, not for me.

Sounds like the Strib is channeling our Treasury Secretary.

Steve Z on April 7, 2009 at 12:10 PM

“Our best chance of continuing to provide the breadth and quality of news,

If they had done that in the first place, they wouldn’t be in this mess.

MarkTheGreat on April 7, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Wouldn’t it be simpler if they just joined the
Liberal Party as the Ministry of Propaganda!

canopfor on April 7, 2009 at 12:20 PM

Rush Limbaugh should buy them.

playblu on April 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Star Trib employees were handing out fliers before the Twins game last night. I didn’t take one, but I saw they said something about saving the paper and community and blah blah blah.

After the game we walked by where they were standing, and they had just left the extra stacks of fliers laying on the ground, soon to be blown away in the wind and littered across downtown. Thanks guys.

strictnein on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Reminds me of the joke by the late comedian, Mitch Hedberg (from Minnesota, BTW):

“I like when people hand out flyers. It’s as if they’re saying, ‘Here, YOU throw this away.’”

Tak_Bulgogi on April 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

attract a new owner who shares our values

Therein lies the root of the problem.

TheBigOldDog on April 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM

I thought good, Lib/Progs shunned sole ownership. Why not get the Red Star’s employees comrades just purchase the paper themselves? That way they can print all the news the Proletariat needs to know. Hey, they could even publish sans those Bourgeois advertisements and look like Pravada.

SeniorD on April 7, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Because it’s so obvious the current business model for newspapers doesn’t work, we’ve been proactively investigating alternative ownership and business models that may ensure the Star Tribune will serve the Twin Cities community for many years to come.

If the business model doesn’t work, then you aren’t really serving anyone but yourself. Perhaps instead of a new business model you need a new editorial model.

Tommy_G on April 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Strib,should manufacture OUTRAGE,
and demand their stimulus bailout!

It seems under the leadership of Hopey/
Changey,it would be un-American,in the
Lefty viewpoint,not to bailout!!(Sarc).

canopfor on April 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM

Rush Limbaugh should buy them.

playblu on April 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Sweet idea.

NebCon on April 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM

izoneguy on April 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM

I’ve got a yearly subscription to a paper, namely one O’Reilly has attacked.

Trying to collapse the papers won’t make the voices any more conservative. Thanks for trying though.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM

playblu on April 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM

They can always refuse.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM

I’ve got a yearly subscription to a paper, namely one O’Reilly has attacked.

Trying to collapse the papers won’t make the voices any more conservative. Thanks for trying though.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Which voices would that be?

oldernwiser on April 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Which voices would that be?

oldernwiser on April 7, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Those whom work for those papers and put their speech in print form.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:43 PM

In the Age of Obama, L3C may just be the next big thing!

Essentially, it is “taxes for thee but not for me”

rbj on April 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM

rbj on April 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Just like those who put their assets in offshore accounts or structure themselves in tax havens. Their names need not be of Soros, but the right wing.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Just like those who put their assets in offshore accounts or structure themselves in tax havens. Their names need not be of Soros, but the right wing.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Would you please provide us with the source that says
1, Only those of the “right wing” use tax havens
2, Which law says that to use tax havens is illegal?

oldernwiser on April 7, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Mcclatchy sold the Strib for $530,000,000.00 2 years ago. If some mental case paid that, it deserves to die. The debt service is more money than a little paper revenues will carry.

seven on April 7, 2009 at 1:02 PM

I am so sorry. I see Mcclatchey paid 1.2 billion for the Strib in 1998. They also deserve to suffer for their bad investment. The only reason these MSM outlets sell for so much above free cash flow is the Leftists will pay mega bucks to get their bloviating published in writing.
for 1.2 billion, they caould have started a free press edition and not sold advertising for years and still burned less cash.

seven on April 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM

I grew up with the Star in the evening and the Tribune in the morning. Did paper routes for both evening and morning papers and helped friends do the same. Looked forward to the Sunday Peach section for all the sports that occurred how the Gophers, Millers, Saints and Lakers fared. I read all the columns by local personalities: Cedric Adams, Jim Klobachar, Sid Hartman, Halsey Hall, Dick Column and the list could go on and on.
Today I don’t care to read it most of the time but my better half insists on subscribing. I think just to get the grocery store ads and coupons although she says she reads the whole thing. My mother-in-law reads the whole think and believes every word in it. Both of them watch the MSM alphabet networks and believe everything they hear their also. This of course is most depressing. My kids neither read the paper nor watch the MSM they are too busy on the computers, cell phones and blackberries.
Time intervened somehow and the StarTrib just doesn’t do it for me like it seemed to in the past. Sure some of it must be me but it really has sunk to the bottom and become the Red Star and the writers, editors and subjects seem almost good enough for high school newspaper or much of the time coming from the socialist training camp for blame America first or rightwing factions are preventing progress and enlightenment school of thought.

I wish it a quick merciful end. RIP StarTrib

rsl775 on April 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM

A “social benefit,” say, along the lines of Air America? Can’t wait for the new junior senator from MN to lecture the benighted citizenry on that topic. For good measure, I understand he also has some personal tax policy experience that could prove germane. (And here I thought Ted Kennedy’s lecturing of Supreme Court nominees on the morals of women’s rights would be hard to top.)

Barnestormer on April 7, 2009 at 1:11 PM

Shorter Strib: “Hey, over here! We’re a vital community institution. Our work is essential. We provide what we think society deserves, so society should take care of us.”

They certainly are a narcissistic bunch.

Dusty on April 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM

James Lileks is a great writer and a world-class fisker. Ever read his Screedblog? It’s just knee deep in the blood and entrails of those who raise his ire, and his lileks.com site is a treasure trove of witty writing and 20th century Americana. I’ve spent literally hours there. I know he’s committed to saving the Strib, but I don’t think his star power will be enough. I really think the only thing that could save most of the smaller papers would be a new international wire service providing actual news, not just regurgitated leftist (AP/AFP) opinion, coupled with a real focus on local news gathering. Unfortunately, I don’t see any of that happening. My local paper, the Florida Times-Union, has become a mishmash of the worst of pop-culture reporting. CNN-esque sob stories dominate the front page, and the Arts/Leisure section is basically a broadsheet-sized People magazine.

On reflection, I don’t think anything can save most of these papers. Sadly, a good portion of our populace is either too ignorant, too apathetic or just too damned stupid to make any effort to inform themselves, preferring to let the “picture box” tell them what to think. On the other hand, so many of us who do attempt to inform ourselves have become so politically polarized (on both sides) that we find bias in most everything we read. The libs in Congress will find a way to save the Newspapers That Are Too Important To Fail (NYT, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune) that support their positions, but the others will be left out in the cold to starve. And starve they will.

mikefln on April 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Trying to collapse the papers won’t make the voices any more conservative. Thanks for trying though.

[sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM]

No, it won’t make the the liberals who work at the liberal newspapers any less liberal, but it will even the free speech playing field.

Dusty on April 7, 2009 at 1:19 PM

a new owner who shares our values

No newspaper that uses phrases like that deserves to survive. That is clear code for “only dogmatists (invariably of the Left) need apply.” Objectivity is the first duty of any newspaper.

JDPerren on April 7, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Well it should be obvious the Strib should become an employee owned co-operative. That way the union members preserve their lifetime jobs, and continue to produce the ‘news’ that they love so much.

Great idea but it will never happen.

The entire purpose of the union is for the union leadership to skim off union dues then shake down management for the other half.

This would be a 50% pay cut.

Also, the employees would have to take on the risk of losing their money and take on the difficulties in managing a business in Obama’s America.

I can’t believe they’d be that stupid. Unemployment will look more attractive than that.

NoDonkey on April 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Blake on April 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Agreed!! The Brits have a couple of good series (i.e. Life on Mars) that should been seen before they get completely ruined by American television networks.

BigWyo on April 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Trying to collapse the papers won’t make the voices any more conservative. Thanks for trying though.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM

It is kind of amusing to see ‘trying to collapse’ used for ‘going tits up’ because no one’s buying the drivel you’re putting out. Kinda sucks when some one keeps score…

BigWyo on April 7, 2009 at 2:02 PM

If they can’t make it on their own, they should go. If people WANT a paper and that paper is what they NEED, they will pay for it. As it stands today, most people don’t care that much for the strib the way it is. That’s the fact.

oakpack on April 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM

This what I posted on their site:

If you really, really wanted to save the newspaper you should be more balanced in your reporting and how about reporting the truth? If the newspapers across the country were honest and really vetted Obama, he wouldn’t be president would he.

When all you do is slant your coverage to 50% of the people, even some of them see through the crap and stop buying your crap. Simple isn’t it.

I don’t think I will hear from them.

cjs1943 on April 7, 2009 at 3:09 PM

Agreed!! The Brits have a couple of good series (i.e. Life on Mars) that should been seen before they get completely ruined by American television networks.

BigWyo on April 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Thanks! I don’t know how this kept under the radar for so long. The DVD of LOM #1 is due out this summer. Love Phil Glenister. lol! And, sigh, Della. All the actors were exceptional as was the writing.

Blake on April 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM

Blake on April 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM

I heard they couldn’t do it because there was a big hairball over the music rights.

Go Guv…..fire up the Quatro!!

BigWyo on April 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM

rsl775 on April 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Well said.

Could be my story, minus the paper route.

How sad it’s come to this.

Bruno Strozek on April 7, 2009 at 3:57 PM

I heard they couldn’t do it because there was a big hairball over the music rights.

Go Guv…..fire up the Quatro!!

BigWyo on April 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM
March 28, 2009 with the second season to be released sometime in 2010. (Yikes! How time flies!)

Ashes to Ashes is also slated to come out on DVD in the US soon. When, I don’t know, but it is already listed on Netflix.

Blake on April 7, 2009 at 4:00 PM

I’ve got a yearly subscription to a paper, namely one O’Reilly has attacked.

Trying to collapse the papers won’t make the voices any more conservative. Thanks for trying though.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM

LOL…by not buying? It’s our right.

ddrintn on April 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM

Just like those who put their assets in offshore accounts or structure themselves in tax havens. Their names need not be of Soros, but the right wing.

sethstorm on April 7, 2009 at 12:46 PM

And good Democrats as well.

ddrintn on April 7, 2009 at 5:04 PM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

No.

blatantblue on April 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Dude, you make me laugh.
+1

pain train on April 7, 2009 at 6:11 PM

Excuse my schadenfreude (that’s Austrian, I think)
while I await the coup de grâce of yet one more of these liberal rags.

pain train on April 7, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Al Qaeda USA are hiring interns; they’e looking for “committed community activists”. Liberal jounalists seem to have the same philosophy, so, it would be a good mariage. No salary, but, with handouts and working the system, AlQ offers the best health care imaginable and a huge life insurance policy for your family, after you’re dead.

luvstotango on April 7, 2009 at 7:07 PM

The employees simply don’t want to do their hero’s bidding. They don’t seem to want to go out and rebuild our nations dams and levees and roads and schools and other infrastructure. They seem to not want to go after one of those mystical ‘green jobs of the future.’ They don’t want to go to back hoe loader repair school to learn vital new 21st century skills. Instead they want to continue to write liberal tripe and be butt boys for the liberal left. What the heck is wrong with them?

kens on April 7, 2009 at 11:36 PM

Ask Al Franken for a donation…after all, he owes you guys.

Dr. ZhivBlago on April 8, 2009 at 2:02 AM