Quote of the day
posted at 10:30 pm on April 7, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
© 2006-2010 Hot Air Network, LLC | Designed by The Blog Studio | Terms of Use

Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
It was nice without you around.
Had to come back. Just can’t get enough, can you?
blatantblue on April 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Isn’t this what we typically call being TWO-FACED? And I don’t know anybody that would view that as a positive trait.
dominigan on April 8, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Is it not funny how some socialist pertend not to like other socialist? (Nationalsozialismus), the National Socialist German Workers.
Johan Klaus on April 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Did your man Obama serve in the military?
Johan Klaus on April 8, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Whoa
ballz2wallz on April 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM
It’s Charles from LGF: ‘I’ve been fighting Islamofascism for a long time. Those Nazi Republicans are always undermining it though. Like Bush bowing and receiving an award from the Saudi king. That’s why I have to defend and excuse Democrats when they do the same thing because if it wasn’t for Nazi types like Rush and Glenn Beck Democrats wouldn’t act this way. It’s Rush and Glenn’s fault I’m fighting the 100s of US military tortures and deaths of Islamofascists rather than the fascists themselves…’ Or something like that.
Sultry Beauty on April 8, 2009 at 9:09 AM
Hehe. That’s right. They always repeat their ‘moral authority’ tag line at the very beginning and the end of their calls. While all through the middle, they spew their Daily Kos talking points like their tongues are on fire.
You don’t get a technique down pat like that just by listening to somebody else do it a couple of times. Seriously, there has to be some coaching and drillwork involved with this.
logis on April 8, 2009 at 9:40 AM
It’s obvious you need to do what your screen name indicates. It is also quite obvious that you never listened to the “debate.” That alleged vet that called was a typical lefty and spouted a load of drivel that he couldn’t possibly back up.
As a vet, I know what goes on during an E & E course. Went through a few of them. The things that were done to the students would be considered “torture” by these left wing fruit loops. In reality, these were minor inconveniences compared to what would really happen to you if you were captrured by the enemy. I agree, our enemies have no problem in beating, torturing, or beheading captured American soldiers, and don’t seem to care if the “world at large” has a problem with it. There are too many times we have to be the “nice guys.” It is way past time we do unto others as they have done unto us.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 9:52 AM
logis
You are right, hence the name “seminar callers”. They are schooled in this technique and believe it will get them to the front of the caller line. They would do better to be honest at the outset. Rush loves to do battle with libtards and really does put them ahead of other callers. Remember: the purpose of a caller is to make Rush look good and ranting liberals always make Rush look good. Personally, I thought Rush was too respectful towards that goon.
Also, military service does not grant absolute moral authority. My meager pedestrian service in Uncle Sugar’s Army grants me only button-busting pride in having given a small piece of myself back to the country I love so much and will still die for if needs be. But it doesn’t make my opinion any more valuable than a non-veteran American.
SKYFOX on April 8, 2009 at 9:54 AM
What a ludicrous claim.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 7:54 AM
its absolutely true. and I hope you get to find out the hard way the result of liberal policies.
you don’t deserve the freedom you have…and it will soon end…better grow a beard and buy a prayer rug. loser.
right4life on April 8, 2009 at 7:59 AM
——–
You’re suggesting that there are no left wing people in the military. That is a ludicrous claim. bozo.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 9:55 AM
we did. please read the red cross report.
he’s supporting torture, as do you.
this is sheer ignorance. human rights groups say about a hundred prisoners were tortured to death in US custody. the pentagon concedes that over a dozen deaths occurred during interrogation.
sesquipedalian on April 8, 2009 at 9:55 AM
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 8:02 AM
Did your man Obama serve in the military?
Johan Klaus on April 8, 2009 at 9:00 AM
—–
No.
Doesn’t make him less of an American than a veteran.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM
Were you born stupid, or do you practice?
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:05 AM
When an anonymous person calls in, claims to be a veteran, and agrees with Rush, he’s an honourable American whose service should be saluted.
When an anonymous caller calls in, claims to be a veteran, and disagrees with Rush, you question his service, call him an a$$hole lefty and even claim he’s just some Dem stooge posing as a veteran.
How retarded.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM
Were you born stupid, or do you practice?
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:05 AM
——-
Did a 7 year old write your comeback for you?
See my 10:09 post.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 10:10 AM
You really don’t have a clue, do you? Hundreds of prisoners from all armed conflicts died during questioning or captivity. That doesn’t mean they all died from torture. These alleged “human rights groups” are notorioulsy anti US and I wouldn’t believe a quarter of the drivel they spout. In most cases, they obtain their information from “sources” that hold some kind of grudge against the organization they are informing on. As for the Red Cross (are you sure it wasn’t the Red Crescent?), they are a joke. Have been for years. They do some good here in the States, but the Salvation Army does a much better job.
Have you ever given any consideration to our soldiers and citizens that have been captured, tortured and killed by the animals we are fighting? Nah, didn’t think so.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM
My questsion still is valid. You just make it too easy.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Were you born stupid, or do you practice?
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:05 AM
——-
Did a 7 year old write your comeback for you?
See my 10:09 post.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 10:10 AM
My questsion still is valid. You just make it too easy.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM
———
You don’t even understand what you type in.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM
There are times when feeding the trolls can be fun. You have absolutely zero comrehension.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM
There are times when feeding the trolls can be fun. You have absolutely zero comrehension.
Nuts4koi on April 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM
——
Respond to my 10:09 post or stfu.
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 10:39 AM
you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
sesquipedalian on April 8, 2009 at 10:39 AM
So, he would have half a brain if you didn’t talk to him?
Listen people. Think once. Think twice. Think: Don’t Play with the retards.
They have no way of even suspecting that you’re making fun of them. All they know is that you are PAYING ATTENTION TO THEM. And, as sad and pathetic as it sounds, that’s what they live for.
logis on April 8, 2009 at 10:43 AM
I wouldn’t say that was going nuclear.
Daddy-O on April 8, 2009 at 10:46 AM
If torturing enemy combatants will save ONE SINGLE AMERICAN life I am all for it. Is this newly worded (crafted) Amerikan society to be too polite to protect itself, thinking subservient words will magically perform peace making miracles? Grow the F**K up and grasp reality. The enemy wants all Americans dead and you want to pat them gently, offer a perfunctory apology for upsetting them in the first place and then preen about how elite you are? Sickening. (oh, BTW, in our new utopia it’s okay to vacuum your kid’s head off during an abortion – no pain – no gain -but don’t you dare pour water into the nostrils of a murdering terrorist/ he has rights). WOW.
Ris4victory on April 8, 2009 at 11:05 AM
The caller’s a plant.
He sounds like a “concerned Christian conservative,” but even if he isn’t, he most definitely has the IQ of a ficus.
Y-not on April 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM
The caller’s a plant.
He sounds like a “concerned Christian conservative,” but even if he isn’t, he most definitely has the IQ of a ficus.
Y-not on April 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM
———
Why is he a plant? Because he disagrees with Rush?
Dave Rywall on April 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Present!
And I also think Hopeychains’ budget is a little timid on spending.
/sarc off/
Sweet_Thang on April 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM
I heard this yesterday and was moved to email Rush congratulating him on not entertaining this guy, and ripping him a new one.
thegreatbeast on April 8, 2009 at 11:18 AM
I love Rush precisely because he lets callers like this go on and make asses of themselves. Name me a liberal TV or radio host that would sit still while someone called him/her a Nazi.
I’m still trying to figure out how Rush lost the election though. That’s a knee slapper. 98% of blacks voted for Barack Obama because of Rush Limbaugh’s support of torture??
rockmom on April 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM
I find that most of the “concerned Christian conservatives” assert that they are conservative (or at least voted against Obama) without providing any rationale for their position. Instead, they segue into one or two talking points, which tend to be based on erroneuos information.
But I concede that he may just be stupid.
In this case we have a guy who keeps referring to “Levine” when he means “Levin” has no first-hand knowledge of the other conservative radio host who was supposedly so detrimental to the Republicans. That certainly speaks to his knowledge and, because it fits in with the Dems’ game plan of attacking the conservative radio voices, it suggests that he is an astroturfer.
Then he brings up Rush’s primary election tactic of encouraging Republicans to vote for Hillary, without mentioning it by name, but fails to explain how that led to Obama winning the general election.
He cites deaths from torture twice, but fails to back up his claim with a source. And, of course, McCain was clearly on the record as opposing torture, so again there is no connection between Rush’s opinion and the results of the election.
As I said, he may just be stupid, but he seems awfully worked up over nothing. He resorts to using the ultimate smear (Nazi) against Rush — which was totally uncalled for, so I assume that he must be very upset. If most of the conservatives I know were to have a chance to talk with the folks they felt were responsible for Obama winning the election, they’d spend at least some of the time venting about why they were upset about Obama winning. Instead, not a word of criticism about Obama passed this guy’s lips.
But maybe he’s just an idiot.
Y-not on April 8, 2009 at 11:31 AM
I don’t have a lot of patience for that. I mean, it’s not like there’s a SHORTAGE of psychotic moonbats in the media these days.
If a guest is being brilliant, let him go on forever. The “vast wasteland” could use a lot more landscaping.
But if somebody’s a complete idiot, you can stop him after just a few seconds and spend a half hour disecting all the insane assumptions behind even the tiniest fragment of liberal propaganda.
I don’t tune into Rush Limbaugh because I want to listen to random moonbats. If this self-proclaimed “American Hero” gets his own show, then he has a right to rant as long as he wants to HIS fans.
But on the channel I listen to, the Rush Limbaugh show is interrupted 11 times a day by ABC News, repeating all of the current Daily Kos bullet points verbatim each and every one of those 11 times. And I don’t see why they need a few more amateur moonbat callers to help them out.
logis on April 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Anything’s possible, but the odds of that are literally millions to one.
If somebody were JUST stupid, without a politcal axe to grind, then he’d be just as likely to call Rush Limbaugh to complain about how his shoes are on the wrong foot again as anything else.
But instead he just HAPPENS to decide to tell us all that he’s a rock-ribbed Republican war hero who thinks Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, and everyone who criticizes Barak Obama is a “Nazi”? …And he closes with the ever-popular: “Oh, and btw, did I mention that I’m a rock-ribbed Republican?”
Sorry; not even remotely plausible. Remember, the odds of stacking those “random” non-sequiturs don’t add together; they multiply exponentially. And the odds against this guy being anything like genuine end up in the high trillions.
logis on April 8, 2009 at 1:34 PM
So then, you DON’T personally knowI was on the verge of insulting ALL liberals, but then I remembered Camille Paglia. As long as there’s ONE honest liberal, I can’t lump them all together. And as long as Ms. Paglia maintains her journalistic integrity, I will count myself as an admirer in spite of the many philosophic differences she and I have.
oldleprechaun on April 8, 2009 at 1:40 PM
I think there’s a chance that the guy is an amateur nut case instead of a professional astroturfer.
My completely unsubstantiated theory is that he’s an older guy — Korean War vet, perhaps (did he mention in which war he served? I don’t have the patience to listen to him again) — who considers himself to be “conservative” because his personal values are traditional and he voted for a Republican once or twice in his life. I think he may have voted for McCain without giving it much thought, but now regrets it because he’s being inundated by liberal talking points both from the media and his own family (probably one or two of his kids who were “shocked” that he voted for McCain and are telling good old dad he’s probably a closet racist). He is sincerely worried about the country and sees that Obama is failing but he has latched on to the notion that the reason Obama is failing has something to do with hate-filled conservatives like Rush… and Levine, whoever the heck that it.
I don’t think he listens to Rush or other conservative commentators. I think he was egged on by someone else, someone who is politically active on the left, to call in because he represented a demographic to them.
Rush should have asked him to explain why he voted for McCain. You can usually tell the astroturfers by their answer to that question.
Y-not on April 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Well du-uh. What do you think the definition of “seminar caller” is anyway?
But if you assume that someone is that willfully deceptive, then why on earth would you think he’d feel honor-bound to enlist a “real” anonymous person with an unverifiable resume to spread propaganda for him? That makes no sense.
Of course it’s POSSIBLE that this guy was a veteran and Republican voter. For all I know, he also single-handedly took San Juan Hill and convinced Ronald Reagan to enter politics. I have no proof that any of that is untrue.
All I’m saying is that is all IMPROBABLE. And once you know that someone is telling you lies, that’s the only criterion that matters.
logis on April 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3