<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich: The U.S. is at greater risk of attack under Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Getting It; Obama loses touch with reality, supporting Turkey&#8217;s EU push &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2070920</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Getting It; Obama loses touch with reality, supporting Turkey&#8217;s EU push &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2070920</guid>
		<description>[...] being a full member of the EU as many have stated that border security is nearly non-existent. Forget America&#8217;s safety, Europe&#8217;s security under Obama&#8217;s leadership would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being a full member of the EU as many have stated that border security is nearly non-existent. Forget America&#8217;s safety, Europe&#8217;s security under Obama&#8217;s leadership would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odie1941</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2069391</link>
		<dc:creator>Odie1941</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2069391</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oink on April 6, 2009 at 11:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

N Korea is in the business of selling rocket technology, namely to anti-American, rogue nations like Iran, who some Pentagon officials believe were in N Korea for the launch. 

Because it successfully deployed Stage 2, as opposed to 3 years ago when it didnt last 40 seconds - the concern is the test was enough to garner $$$ for ICBM R&amp;D. 

As I mentioned yesterday - take out Kim, all installations - and you cut the head off the snake. As I also mentioned yesterday - China couldnt give a rats ass about the N Koreans - in fact are more concerned with N Koreans flooding the Chinese border to safety and causing a depletion of resources, being the estimates are 1.5M-2M refugees fleeing N Korea. 

China does not have the upper hand, though they feign it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oink on April 6, 2009 at 11:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>N Korea is in the business of selling rocket technology, namely to anti-American, rogue nations like Iran, who some Pentagon officials believe were in N Korea for the launch. </p>
<p>Because it successfully deployed Stage 2, as opposed to 3 years ago when it didnt last 40 seconds &#8211; the concern is the test was enough to garner $$$ for ICBM R&amp;D. </p>
<p>As I mentioned yesterday &#8211; take out Kim, all installations &#8211; and you cut the head off the snake. As I also mentioned yesterday &#8211; China couldnt give a rats ass about the N Koreans &#8211; in fact are more concerned with N Koreans flooding the Chinese border to safety and causing a depletion of resources, being the estimates are 1.5M-2M refugees fleeing N Korea. </p>
<p>China does not have the upper hand, though they feign it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duff65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2069106</link>
		<dc:creator>duff65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2069106</guid>
		<description>And do you still believe that so many of us here are suffering from ODS or maybe, just maybe, we were right about the backstabbing lying crapweasel SOB.

SKYFOX on April 7, 2009 at 9:06 AM

You must really like the guy.  That post is almost a compliment based on his performance to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And do you still believe that so many of us here are suffering from ODS or maybe, just maybe, we were right about the backstabbing lying crapweasel SOB.</p>
<p>SKYFOX on April 7, 2009 at 9:06 AM</p>
<p>You must really like the guy.  That post is almost a compliment based on his performance to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2069093</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2069093</guid>
		<description>I don’t take Obama’s nuclear disarmament rhetoric seriously...
AP

So, AP, what Obama rhetoric do you take seriously?
Are you still waiting for the New York Times to tell you what to believe?
And do you still believe that so many of us here are suffering from ODS or maybe, just maybe, we were right about the backstabbing lying crapweasel SOB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t take Obama’s nuclear disarmament rhetoric seriously&#8230;<br />
AP</p>
<p>So, AP, what Obama rhetoric do you take seriously?<br />
Are you still waiting for the New York Times to tell you what to believe?<br />
And do you still believe that so many of us here are suffering from ODS or maybe, just maybe, we were right about the backstabbing lying crapweasel SOB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingforpigs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2069058</link>
		<dc:creator>workingforpigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2069058</guid>
		<description>maybe our president wants to sell our old rockets to Korea so he has enought money to fund the pork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe our president wants to sell our old rockets to Korea so he has enought money to fund the pork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wintery Knight Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068892</link>
		<dc:creator>Wintery Knight Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068892</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama cuts military spending, blinks at North Korean&#160;aggression...&lt;/strong&gt;

You knew that the socialist ACORN lawyer was going to cut military spending at some point. Well, he&#8217;s done it.
Sweetness and Light reports on the cuts in military spending here. (H/T Gateway Pundit)
Excerpt from an AP article:
Production of the F...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama cuts military spending, blinks at North Korean&nbsp;aggression&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You knew that the socialist ACORN lawyer was going to cut military spending at some point. Well, he&#8217;s done it.<br />
Sweetness and Light reports on the cuts in military spending here. (H/T Gateway Pundit)<br />
Excerpt from an AP article:<br />
Production of the F&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritk9</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068882</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritk9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068882</guid>
		<description>&quot;reasonably prudent&quot;? 

That&#039;s just f&#039;kin funny. Really it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;reasonably prudent&#8221;? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s just f&#8217;kin funny. Really it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068601</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068601</guid>
		<description>Seriously, why is NoKo even an issue after all these years?  They have nothing we want.  They supply nothing to the rest of the world (correct me if I&#039;m wrong.)  Yet we keep shooing at the same fly year after year after year.  I cannot understand why we don&#039;t get the fly swatter after him and take aim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, why is NoKo even an issue after all these years?  They have nothing we want.  They supply nothing to the rest of the world (correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.)  Yet we keep shooing at the same fly year after year after year.  I cannot understand why we don&#8217;t get the fly swatter after him and take aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068589</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068589</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Never would have fired it under Bush … just sayin’.

ex-Democrat on April 6, 2009 at 6:14 PM
So true…

right2bright on April 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

+1

Allahpundit, why must you always play devil&#039;s advocate?  Is that it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Never would have fired it under Bush … just sayin’.</p>
<p>ex-Democrat on April 6, 2009 at 6:14 PM<br />
So true…</p>
<p>right2bright on April 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>+1</p>
<p>Allahpundit, why must you always play devil&#8217;s advocate?  Is that it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068528</guid>
		<description>Who knows?

Terrorism doesn&#039;t necessarily mean hitting all available targets, but merely getting their message out there and of course, instilling fear in a populace, causing mistrust and infighting and mobilizing the Left who are sympathetic to your cause and unsympathetic to Democracy and Conservatism.

Just showing that they could carry out a major attack was a big deal, and that thought will always loom in the back of our minds.  Also, 9-11 set into motion a series of events that led to the re-election of Jimmy Carter, so that in itself may be enough for them...for now anyway.

Still, the other aspect of terrorism is that it&#039;s unpredictable.  When it doesn&#039;t happen, or if they are stopped, then what is predictable is that the Left will go on about the &#039;culture of fear&#039; that Conservatives use to gain power and bring Nazi/Fascist rule and talk about how they &#039;cry wolf&#039; once too often and that it is &lt;em&gt;we&lt;/em&gt; who are the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; terrorists.

Works like a charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows?</p>
<p>Terrorism doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean hitting all available targets, but merely getting their message out there and of course, instilling fear in a populace, causing mistrust and infighting and mobilizing the Left who are sympathetic to your cause and unsympathetic to Democracy and Conservatism.</p>
<p>Just showing that they could carry out a major attack was a big deal, and that thought will always loom in the back of our minds.  Also, 9-11 set into motion a series of events that led to the re-election of Jimmy Carter, so that in itself may be enough for them&#8230;for now anyway.</p>
<p>Still, the other aspect of terrorism is that it&#8217;s unpredictable.  When it doesn&#8217;t happen, or if they are stopped, then what is predictable is that the Left will go on about the &#8216;culture of fear&#8217; that Conservatives use to gain power and bring Nazi/Fascist rule and talk about how they &#8216;cry wolf&#8217; once too often and that it is <em>we</em> who are the <em>real</em> terrorists.</p>
<p>Works like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2068451</link>
		<dc:creator>Oink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2068451</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll get back to you after I check with my son, as he’s less than 2 hours away from Seoul. Without a doubt, he and his fellow Airman should know what you are missing.

ladyingray on April 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Good one!  God bless your son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ll get back to you after I check with my son, as he’s less than 2 hours away from Seoul. Without a doubt, he and his fellow Airman should know what you are missing.</p>
<p>ladyingray on April 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Good one!  God bless your son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommylotto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067929</link>
		<dc:creator>tommylotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067929</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Granted, the UN kabuki is pointless, but it keeps North Korea reasonably quiet while we attend to more pressing matters. What am I missing here?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s what they said while Hitler rearmed and drove into the Sudetenland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Granted, the UN kabuki is pointless, but it keeps North Korea reasonably quiet while we attend to more pressing matters. What am I missing here?</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s what they said while Hitler rearmed and drove into the Sudetenland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Toombs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067904</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Toombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067904</guid>
		<description>Of course Obama HAD to make his nuclear disarmament announcement when he did.  Who knew the Norks were gonna light off their missile when the did?

(Only the rest of us who&#039;ve been following the news for the last month, that&#039;s who.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Obama HAD to make his nuclear disarmament announcement when he did.  Who knew the Norks were gonna light off their missile when the did?</p>
<p>(Only the rest of us who&#8217;ve been following the news for the last month, that&#8217;s who.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalleywag</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067820</link>
		<dc:creator>scalleywag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067820</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.

    Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.

    It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.

    getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re still using the con word, but hey, you didn&#039;t mention the &quot;adults were in charge&quot;.  Because they are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.</p>
<p>    Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.</p>
<p>    It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.</p>
<p>    getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re still using the con word, but hey, you didn&#8217;t mention the &#8220;adults were in charge&#8221;.  Because they are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalleywag</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067808</link>
		<dc:creator>scalleywag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067808</guid>
		<description>I like Newt.  Why couldn&#039;t he be our guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Newt.  Why couldn&#8217;t he be our guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeathToMediaHacks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067729</link>
		<dc:creator>DeathToMediaHacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067729</guid>
		<description>Newt Gingrich is an absolute joke. Nice thread Allah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich is an absolute joke. Nice thread Allah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punchenko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067693</link>
		<dc:creator>Punchenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067693</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.

Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.

It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.

getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Once the cons give him the GOP nomination he will do another photo shoot with Nanners on the loveseat and do some climate fearmongering to get everyone else on board.

Don&#039;t worry, there is plenty of fearmongering to go around for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.</p>
<p>Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.</p>
<p>It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.</p>
<p>getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Once the cons give him the GOP nomination he will do another photo shoot with Nanners on the loveseat and do some climate fearmongering to get everyone else on board.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, there is plenty of fearmongering to go around for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuffy Meigs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067691</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuffy Meigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067691</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.

getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But guess who DID say something? &lt;a href=&quot;http://closingvelocity.typepad.com/closing_velocity/2009/03/democrats-call-for-airstrike-against-north-korean-launchpad.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Democrats wanted to bomb the launchpad in 2006&lt;/a&gt;. This time? &lt;em&gt;{crickets}&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.</p>
<p>getalife on April 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But guess who DID say something? <a href="http://closingvelocity.typepad.com/closing_velocity/2009/03/democrats-call-for-airstrike-against-north-korean-launchpad.html" rel="nofollow">Democrats wanted to bomb the launchpad in 2006</a>. This time? <em>{crickets}</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkei</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067682</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067682</guid>
		<description>With GOP leaders like Newt, it&#039;s no wonder the party will stay in the minority for a good time to come.   Yet Palin (as she continues to take on an 18 year old kid in the press)  makes him look almost passable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With GOP leaders like Newt, it&#8217;s no wonder the party will stay in the minority for a good time to come.   Yet Palin (as she continues to take on an 18 year old kid in the press)  makes him look almost passable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkei</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067686</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067686</guid>
		<description>With GOP leaders like Newt, it&#039;s no wonder the party will stay in the minority for a good time to come.   Yet Palin (as she continues to take on an 18 year old kid in the press)  makes him look almost passable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With GOP leaders like Newt, it&#8217;s no wonder the party will stay in the minority for a good time to come.   Yet Palin (as she continues to take on an 18 year old kid in the press)  makes him look almost passable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loxodonta</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067670</link>
		<dc:creator>Loxodonta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067670</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Could it be that our defense/intel establishment types recommended to Obama to not do anything so that we could gather intel on the missile’s performance and the Norks’ capabilities?

flipflop on April 6, 2009 at 6:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I doubt that, as the US didn&#039;t even bother to use it&#039;s best monitoring system on the NK missile test, according to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-north-korea-missile6-2009apr06,0,4471509.story?track=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LA Times&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;However, U.S. officials did not use one of their most powerful radar systems, the sea-based X-band radar, which would have been capable of monitoring a broader area in greater detail. Officials did not say why the X-band radar was not used. But the X-band system is a key component of the U.S. missile-defense system and its use could have been seen by other countries as provocative.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Could it be that our defense/intel establishment types recommended to Obama to not do anything so that we could gather intel on the missile’s performance and the Norks’ capabilities?</p>
<p>flipflop on April 6, 2009 at 6:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I doubt that, as the US didn&#8217;t even bother to use it&#8217;s best monitoring system on the NK missile test, according to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-north-korea-missile6-2009apr06,0,4471509.story?track=rss" rel="nofollow">LA Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>However, U.S. officials did not use one of their most powerful radar systems, the sea-based X-band radar, which would have been capable of monitoring a broader area in greater detail. Officials did not say why the X-band radar was not used. But the X-band system is a key component of the U.S. missile-defense system and its use could have been seen by other countries as provocative.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonosam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067667</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067667</guid>
		<description>In some ways yes,

but what would have carter done in obamas place?

obama has been toeing the line as far as prosecution of the war while dishing his populist pap at the same time.

Im not sure carter wouldnt have pulled out or something worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some ways yes,</p>
<p>but what would have carter done in obamas place?</p>
<p>obama has been toeing the line as far as prosecution of the war while dishing his populist pap at the same time.</p>
<p>Im not sure carter wouldnt have pulled out or something worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanaSmiles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067599</link>
		<dc:creator>DanaSmiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Not since Jimmy Carter have we had an administration this out of touch with reality.”…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The understatement of the year!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Not since Jimmy Carter have we had an administration this out of touch with reality.”…</p></blockquote>
<p>The understatement of the year!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CynicalOptimist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067589</link>
		<dc:creator>CynicalOptimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067589</guid>
		<description>All God&#039;s (and Allah&#039;s) people said, AMEN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All God&#8217;s (and Allah&#8217;s) people said, AMEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getalife</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/06/gingrich-the-us-is-at-greater-risk-of-attack-under-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2067581</link>
		<dc:creator>getalife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=49117#comment-2067581</guid>
		<description>Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.

Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.

It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, they did fire the rockets in 2006. Newt said nothing.</p>
<p>Newt is playing the fear card for the cons.</p>
<p>It will not work on the majority but they got nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
