North Korea supplies the fireworks for Obama’s no-nukes pledge
posted at 12:20 pm on April 5, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Joe Biden warned us that the world would test the inexperienced rookie President if we elected Barack Obama to the White House. He expected one international crisis in the first six months, but North Korea had a different timetable. They launched a missile yesterday just as Obama demanded an end to nuclear weapons, highlighting the rather Utopian thinking of such a proposal, as The Hill’s Bridget Johnson reports:
President Obama’s Sunday speech against nuclear proliferation got a dramatic backdrop when North Korea fired a rocket through Japanese airspace just a few hours earlier.
North Korea’s official news agency had been warning about the launch from the moment that Obama had been wrapping up his business at the NATO meetings on Saturday. “Preparations for launching ‘Kwangmyongsong-2,’ an experimental communications satellite, by carrier rocket ‘Unha-2′ have been completed at the satellite launching ground in the east coastal area of the DPRK,” the Korean Central News Agency reported.
But few believed that North Korea’s long-range, multi-stage rocket test had anything to do with communications, other than sending a warning to its neighbors. While North Korea claimed Sunday that their satellite was successfully deployed to launch its space program, U.S. and South Korean watchers said no satellite or other object went into orbit as a result of the launch.
Meanwhile, Obama pretended that we can put the genie back in the bottle:
“I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons,” Obama said to a crowd of about 20,000 packed into the historic square in the Czech Republic’s capital city. “This goal will not be reached quickly — perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change.”
People will react by saying, “Well, what’s wrong with wishing away nuclear weapons?” Nothing, up until we base American foreign policy on wishful thinking. We’ve been fully committed to non-proliferation for decades, and we can see how well that worked with the North Korea launch. We’re now almost two full decades since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the MAD standoff, and nuclear weapons haven’t disappeared — they’ve spread despite supposed commitments from Russia, China, and other nuclear nations to stop proliferation.
Unfortunately, the science won’t disappear. Nations that put enough effort into R&D will eventually figure out a design for nuclear weapons. Networks like the AQ Khan ring will sell the designs to dictators desperate enough to want them to cement their power. Lunatics, such at the Iranian mullahcracy, will pursue nuclear weapons to arrange their personal Armageddons. Quite literally, the only way to stamp out the danger of nuclear weapons is to depose every potential lunatic who might use them — which the nations of the West absolutely refuse to do, and which would actually underscore the security nukes bring to dictators. No one would depose an already-nuclear despot and risk all-out nuclear war, especially one with medium- and long-range missiles, like North Korea and Kim Jong-Il.
There has never been a weapon in human history that all people simply decided to stop using, unless a bigger weapon superceded it. Science does not go backward. Nuclear weapons will not simply disappear, and it’s childish to believe they will. What we need is better leadership on how to live in a nuclear world, better commitment to non-proliferation, including the will to force rogue nations into compliance. Sitting around wishing for the world to forget established science will only make those tasks harder.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »
I am still annoyed about Obama’s we are morally responsible for nukes line.
rob verdi on April 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM
He is making us look like morons.
Joe Caps on April 5, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Good thing some people didn’t vote for that RINO McCain. America and the world will learn their lesson and vote Conservatives in next time!! At least what is left of America and the world will :/
aikidoka on April 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM
They failed again launch a satellite.
South Korea’s turn to try.
The President is doing the right thing.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM
So where’s that “satellite” they were launching?
cs89 on April 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Sorry, you actually think they were trying to launch a satellite on that missile?
Good grief….
Forget getting a life, get a brain.
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Some video of Obama’s Prague speech, including some more words about the NK launch and a surprising (if still hedged) statement that European missile defense will go forward.
Cuffy Meigs on April 5, 2009 at 12:27 PM
What a childish dream, love the way he’s passive to the rest of the world, and so hard on the people who elected him. Gotta go with Dirty Harry’s theory on gun control (it applies in a global sense also) “If there;s a gun in the room, I want to control it.”
Tommy_G on April 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM
In the Pacific ocean.
It failed.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Yes, I’m sure the dem Congress would accept a three million person armed forces to create the deterrent effect now placed on nuclear weapons. Moreover, if the US were really serious of unilaterally disarming, you would see a frenzied affect in other countries now dependent on the US nuclear umbrella to create nukes. In fact, I would suspect, given this speech, that countries under our umbrella would have to believe that under Pres. Obama, he won’t push that button, no matter what the provocation is, unless the US itself is hit, and even then the odds might be fifty fifty.
eaglewingz08 on April 5, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Why don’t you make that line a permanent part of your post’s signature. You might as well.
Please take an English lesson.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM
And I should have added: expect an announcement tomorrow of Obama’s gutting missile defense by $1-2 billion.
Cuffy Meigs on April 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Getting rolled by some wacked out punk is the right thing?
MISSILE DEFENSE!
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Only someone as stupid as getaclue would blow off this launch as no big deal; proof that too much internet porn and Cheetos really can affect your brain.
As for Ogabe, nice tepid response to North Korea, Mr. Spine of Steel. You are going to get a lot of people needlessly killed before you are finally driven from office.
Bishop on April 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Obama is going to destroy all nukes then he is going to solve world hunger and all diseases.
lavell12 on April 5, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Notice how GETALIFE believes the North Korean leader AND Obama? Quite telling.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Kim’s missle launch makes a mockery of Obama’s fantasy-based foreign policy. Iran will soon do the same. Meanwhile China and Russia are laughing at the paper tiger and licking their chops.
But they better not push Obama too far. He might get angry and write them a letter, or something.
petefrt on April 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM
My prediction is this kind of event will get a reaction of very strong language and angry letters!
eforhan on April 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Soooo…
He wants us to unilateraly disarm…
And not continue the Missle Defense deployment…
And won’t do anything about NORKs or Iran getting nukes…
So… Nukes for thee, but not for me???
Romeo13 on April 5, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Notice how GETALIFE believes the North Korean leader AND Obama? Quite telling.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 12:32 PM
A lifetime of being chosen last for every game of dodge-ball, tag and sandlot baseball has warped his thinking.
Bishop on April 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM
North and South Korea are having a competition to be the first to launch a satellite.
Do some research cons.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM
We will have a nuke free world when someone builds a better bomb, and not before. That is just the nature of man.
You must defend yourself with the biggest stick or you’ll get a knock on the head.
Gwillie on April 5, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Sitting around wishing for the world to forget established science will only make those tasks harder.
But all those ‘wishers’ will feel sooooooooooo good preaching ‘from the high moral ground’.
GarandFan on April 5, 2009 at 12:37 PM
The difference is, the South what`s their satellites to go up and in orbit. The North what`s their “satellites” to eventually go down into an American or SK city.
Open your eyes, lib. MISSLE DEFENSE!
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Again, this goes back to the campaign. Remember that TV spot Obama ran during the primaries where he discussed his plans for our national defense should he be elected? Remember how the drive-bys ignored it(except for the lunatics who actually embraced it)?
While it is somewhat surprising that Obama would be making these types of speeches when North Korea just launched a missile, his ideology shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone. This is who the man is. I just hope the so-called conservatives who backed this idiot have learned their lesson.
Doughboy on April 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Democracy promotion is “wishful thinking” and it was the basis of our foreign policy for the last 8 years. WMDs was nothing but “wishful thinking” for a justification for war in Iraq. Wait to be intellectually dishonest Ed, it’s a totally new thing for you.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM
One of the bigger problems with NK’s launch is that they will surely sell the technology. Iran last I heard had nuclear material but not a delivery method. Say hello to Cold War II
msmveritas on April 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM
The most logical explanation is that they were lying, they didn’t want to launch a satellite, but are testing for weapons.
It’s the most logical explanation- which explains why you can’t understand that.
cs89 on April 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Wrong again Lefty. It was a 3 stage rocket. The first stage fell into the sea of Japan. The second stage went into the Pacific. There has been no official word on the location of the third stage yet.
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
And that relates to NK launching that missle…..how?
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
“As a nuclear power — as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon — the United States has a moral responsibility to act,” he said.
So, while on European soil, the current occupant of the White House is blaming FDR for ending WWII.
Loxodonta on April 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM
If you are scared of North Korea and Iran having nukes, you should want to get rid of all nukes but you don’t.
So, they will have nukes and other countries will have them too to make the world a more dangerous place to live.
Man up and deal with it.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:42 PM
This person actually believes the goal of the launch by the NKs was to put a satellite in space.
Lordy….
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:43 PM
While it is somewhat surprising that Obama would be making these types of speeches when North Korea just launched a missile, his ideology shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone.
You aren’t exactly talking about the brightest bulb ever to grace a Kwanzaa tree; Ogabe’s brain and mouth have been on different frequencies since the day he announced his candidacy.
Of course the media whores will bend over and do their level best to erase any public concerns about NK’s rockets and Ogabe’s limp-wristed response.
Bishop on April 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Who do you think is going to go into Iran and North Korea to get rid of those nukes then? Russia? Japan? Britain? France? Who???
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM
So , he don’t wish for world peace and fairness. Evil Obama..
the_nile on April 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM
These are the statements of a 4-year old.
To a child, there is no difference between the US having a nuclear weapon and Iran or North Korea having them.
It’s not the nature of the regime, it’s just the possession of the weapons themselves that is the problem.
Children with computers…
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Peace through
strengthapologies and appeasement. Peas in our time.When nukes are outlawed, only outlaws will have nukes. And without a strong missile defense, we’ll be as defenseless against outlaws as school children in a gun-free zone.
petefrt on April 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Ever seen the end of a successful hostage negotiation?
Hint- the police officer who walks into a room without a gun or backup, while the kidnapper is armed, doesn’t win.
“High moral ground” is a preferable stance in moral debate. It doesn’t help in negotiating with hostile foreign powers.
cs89 on April 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Oh! So you’re saying we should just get rid of all of our nukes and then the North Koreans will follow suit?
What are you smoking?
Otis B on April 5, 2009 at 12:46 PM
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
It is called reality.
Adults are in charge.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:46 PM
I keep saying Obama should do just that. But he won’t.
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM
What? Why would the Chonger lie?
You know, normally I just ignore getalife’s posts, but this is just too fun to pass up…
Otis B on April 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM
With a Christmas wish list as his only skill.
Wishing for more than anyone in the history.
the_nile on April 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM
It is called reality.
Adults are in charge.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM
What-where?
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Ok Getabrain
Explain to us “cons” how to get rid of all nukes?
I really want to know, but until you have a workable answer I’m keeping the only proven defense to a nuclear attack, deterrence
Gwillie on April 5, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Well, please have them come here and post.
Cause the “adults” arguing your “position” (if we can call it that) sure as hell aren’t posting here.
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:49 PM
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Apparently getaclue will be charging the White House, protest sign in hand, as he demands to know why Ogabe hasn’t set the example of nuclear-free world by getting rid of American nukes.
As I’ve been saying, Axelrod sent us the dumb trolls, apparently the ones with intelligence have been assigned elsewhere.
Bishop on April 5, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Let’s see, there’s no difference between Britain having nuclear weapons and North Korea or Iran having them.
It’s the weapons themselves that’s the problem. Not the regimes having them.
Yep, the “adults” believe this.
SteveMG on April 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM
*cough* Truman *cough*
And I swear to God you right wingers are the most weak willed, sensitive losers on planet earth. “OMG, he said we are the only nation to use a nuclear weapon?!?!?” Well for christ sake that is ACCURATE. Though I guess I can’t expect people to recognize a plan stating of fact when they think FDR dropped the bomb. Good lord.
No where did Obama say “and we were wrong/and we apologize/we shouldn’t have/I wish we hadn’t.” He said that we had and that we were the only ones to do so. And I know people have a series of arguments about why it was justified, which would be relevant if there were an argument made by Obama that it wasn’t justified. But he DIDN’T make that argument. You guys are jut feeling guilty and defensive about the fact we dropped two nukes on two cities and kills tens of thousands of people and gave a generation radiation poisoning.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Heeheehee… it’s the follow-up satellite to the Pulmylongdong-4 satellite.
Frozen Tex on April 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM
That IS a good question, I await the answer. And be serious, no insults or anything, I`m actually looking for your answer.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM
getalife, there was no satellite. Why do you buy the North Korean lie?
BottomLine5 on April 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Just wait the UN will straighten all this mess out…/sarc
d1carter on April 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Well left-winger, I don`t feel guilty.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Not to knit-pick (your the master) but it was under FDR that we began the Manhattan project and drew up the plans for the attacks, Truman just implemented the plans.
Gwillie on April 5, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Me neither. I had family in WWII, and they may have very well been among the hundreds of thousands killed in an invasion of Japan.
We’ve become a nation of weaklings.
cs89 on April 5, 2009 at 12:55 PM
I`m still waiting for getallife to tell us how we get rid of all nukes and get nations like Iran, North Korea to Russia and China to do the same.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 12:55 PM
The first step is a series of bilateral reductions with the Russians as we have the two largest arsenals. If the U.S. can not get the Russians to begin the reduction process then the process is dead in the water. You continue those gradual reductions until our arsenal has been cut in half. We’d still have an arsenal greater than any other nation by a long shot and more than enough nukes to destroy the entire world many times over.
Once the U.S. and Russia have demonstrated a serious committment to nuclear disarmament then we can make a case to Isreal, UK, India etc. I say we strengthen the ABM treaty and actually start putting some oomph behind international law, i.e. submitting that we may be in violation of it on occasion and be willing to pay penalties for our violation. A law code that no one adheres to is meaningless and as long as the U.S. refuses to adhere to international law we can’t really enforce it can we.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 12:56 PM
The next time a man with a bomb threatens your school, man up.
Don’t call the police. Call a meeting of the student council.
The children are in charge.
Loxodonta on April 5, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Why should we feel any guilt for ending years of war in a manner that until recently all historians agreed saved over a million lives on both sides?
Gwillie on April 5, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Isn’t it great? And he’s going to cure cancer, too!
I just about bust a gut laughing when I heard that. I’d watched the silly movie “Swing Vote” days before. In his frenzy to win the only vote that counted, one of the candidates had promised exactly the same thing!
Obama’s a great campaigner. Too bad he doesn’t have a clue how to govern.
ProfessorMiao on April 5, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Well, the children ARE in charge now, after all.
Del Dolemonte on April 5, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Lots of nations were working on the bomb, Truman decided to actually use it. I don’t know if FDR would have gone through with it or not, but to say that “FDR dropped the bomb” is historically innacurate. And in this case the decision to actually do it is a BIG step in the process.
Then stop complaining when Obama mentions what you clearly think to be a glorious acheivement.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Is your middle initial N?
Naive
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 1:00 PM
You honestly believe NK and Pakistan will give up their nukes which are the only thing that make them famous? You think Iran would buy into that? Dream on.
a capella on April 5, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Russia is so seriously committed to disarmament that they sold the technology to Iran. And of course, Iran and North Korea will be sooooo eager to follow along.
What are you smoking?
ProfessorMiao on April 5, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Sounda good, but why would Russia, China and Iran want to give up nukes as they as we have competing interests? Or do we let Russia have Eastern Europe, China push us out and dominate the Pacific ad Iran to hold the Middle East hostage and wipe out Israel?
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 1:01 PM
I’m not sure what any of these nations would do in a world where Russia and the U.S. decreased their nuclear arsenals by half. I do know that doing so wouldn’t substantively impact our ability to deter other nations from using nukes as we would still have thousands of nuclear warheads and IBMs, perception wise it’d be hugely persuasive.
As for Iran and North Korea. Yeah I doubt much will persuade them as long as American military bases surround their country. I’d feel threatened too if North Koread had a huge base in Canada and Iran had SEVEN bases in Canada and Mexico. It’s amazing to me that we can be surrounding a nation with military bases and at the same time claim “but they are threatening US by firing a missle.”
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:02 PM
The President took the first step and proposed it but there is no plan yet. Probably will not happen in our lifetimes so don’t worry about it.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 1:03 PM
I did not complain about his “we`re at fault for nuclear weapons.” Please be more considerate and not put words in my mouth.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Get a shortwave radio and you can listen to North Korea’s English language news service directly. They’ve got great things going on there and you’ll be able to hear all about it. With judgment like yours I bet you’ll be on a plane to Pyongyang within a few weeks.
DarkCurrent on April 5, 2009 at 1:03 PM
My only regret is that we failed to use them since.
All the worlds problems with NK could be resolved in a little under 30 minutes.
Iran would no longer be a threat.
Afghanistan would be a case for the history books.
You get the idea. Actually, If we had fried Afghanistan, neither Iran or NK would be a threat today.
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 1:05 PM
We’ve done that, didn’t help. While we were doing that India and Pakistan tested their own bombs.
So are you saying we change the law so that we have to get some of those nasty “strongly worded letters” that NK has gotten? Yea this launch shows how that works out.
Your post is standard left think. We got them so other feel the need to have them, if we get rid of them others will too. News Flash. The would don’t work that way!
Gwillie on April 5, 2009 at 1:05 PM
I don`t think it`s responsible to pass this along to future generations. So we should worry.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 1:05 PM
A. thanks for admitting that military power is all about shoring up various economic interests. Some neo-con idiots out here seem to think it’s about “keeping the world safe” or some other such nonsense.
B. I actually am not sure how much our interests differ from these nations these days outside of questions of who controls energy resources and who gets to recolonize Africa which the Chinese are doing faster than Europe ever could. Russia has Iran. We have Saudi Arabia. Been that way for years and not really sure why, suddenly, we’re acting as if one nuke in the hand of Iran is going to shift things.
C. If we have different “interests” than China none of our presidential administrations in the last 20 years have indicated so as they gradually sell our childrens debt to the Chinese, particularly over the last 8 years. They basically paid for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:06 PM
What do you mean “look” like morons. We elected him, and we now sit by like trained monkeys while he destroys our nation from the inside out. Seems to me maybe we “are” morons.
MikeA on April 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM
If I ever am unsure about being on the left side of the aisle I just have to remember that a significant amount of neo-cons think mass genocide in multiple countries is a viable foreign policy and I’m assured again. God you’re sick.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Yes, it was Truman who dropped the bombs. I’m functioning, if I may be so kind to myself, on 3 hours sleep.
However, at least I’m not living in a dreamworld in which it would be good for the United States to eliminate our nuclear weapons and turn world security over to the UN.
Loxodonta on April 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM
This was all potemkin theatre for internal north korean consumption.
See this for:
so there is no satellite but lil’ kim has troubles at home. Big troubles:
The financial markets are in food distribution. From earlier in the article:
which is something that Kim used to use to control the populace (elsewhere in the same article).
gh on April 5, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Why doesn’t getalife and DTMH just move to North Korea? Think they would survive? Those two communists and the other trolls on here think that Socialism is so great then get the hell out of our Country. There are many countries that would love for you both to live. You will find out how much those Countries would accept you both.
sheebe on April 5, 2009 at 1:09 PM
So Obama will fail.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Israel is so tiny a single relatively small nuke would “wipe it off the map”. You don’t think Iran possessing that nuke would shift things?
You are an idiot.
Guardian on April 5, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Yes, he will make them all illegal. He’ll ban nukes, hunger and disease.
Meanwhile here at home, he’ll overturn the law of supply and demand, and outlaw inequality… except for celebs, union people (including teachers), professorcrats, MSM execs, trail lawyers, and gubmit workers.
With so much to look forward to, I can hardly wait.
petefrt on April 5, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Yes I trust the North Koreans. /sarc
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,501031103-526547,00.html
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 1:12 PM
I was thinking more along the lines of we want soverignty for eastern european nations and China wants NK as a military deterrent against us. But ecomics plays into it too.
ThePrez on April 5, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Don’t be too quick to write off Mr. Obama on the Korean nukes issue. I have it on good authority that should they launch another missile he is prepared to say “tut, tut” in the most forceful manner possible.
Mason on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
The President will not fix all the problems neglected in the past in 8 years.
He is starting the change but will be up to Americans to vote to continue the change or vote gop to stop it and go back to destroying our economy and country.
getalife on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Give me a number.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
You are an idiot if you think Iran would Nuke Isreal. Contrary to your mindless neo-con propaganda about Iran (which we’ve been force fed ever since the CIA crushed the democratic movement and installed a dictator in the fifties) they don’t have a desire to destroy themselves just for the pleasure of shooting a nuke at Isreal. But of course you would think that, you think that committing genocide is viable foreign policy.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
How many years now has North Korea been pulling our chain? Way too many. I think we should have shot it down no matter what it was. The “dear leader” with a space program. Riiiigggghhhht. He should be spending missile money on food for his subjects.
scalleywag on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
I see a big difference between “us” and the Chonger.
What do you think we should do about this recent launch, which we warned against, and said “there would be consequences” if they carried through with it?
I mean, the cat is out of the bag. So what now?
Otis B on April 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM
You, like Obama, see every other country’s actions as nothing more than a response to America’s. And that is where your thinking is fatally dangerous and, yes, bigoted. It might comfort you to think that if only America did what you consider to be the ‘right thing’, all would be well with the world. You think US isolationism will result in isolationism everywhere, and conflict will no longer exist. You ascribe to other nations no capacity or will to define self-interest in anything except ‘defensive’ terms by interpreting everything that other nations do as nothing more than their responses to America’s actions.
And if you stick your head in the sand, no one can see you.
ProfessorMiao on April 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Why should we feel guilty for reasonable actions of a long-past Democrat administration? I’m just sad we don’t have Democrats like that anymore.
DarkCurrent on April 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Show me a thread on a conservative blog that even references nuclear weapons and I’ll show you a post advocating the nuking of Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea all at once.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
How much do you get paid to shill?
You truly are a joke who cannot and will not think for yourself. You should be crying.
Jamson64 on April 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
I have never in my life read such utterly ignorance before. You need some real truthful Education. Ignorance is reeking and if you think that one nuke cannot wipe out Israel then you are very naive. Your comments are very comical. Can imagine the laughs that other posters get from you and your partner getalife. I know I laugh you.
sheebe on April 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM
If I ever am unsure about being on the left side of the aisle I just have to remember that a significant amount of neo-cons think mass genocide in multiple countries is a viable foreign policy and I’m assured again. God you’re sick.
DeathToMediaHacks on April 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM
Way to broad brush; did I tell you that a significant amount of liberals think that soldiers are baby-killing morons? No really, it’s true.
Hold on, it’s the phone…hey, it’s for you. Rwanda is calling and they want to discuss some things about Bill Clinton(D) and Madeline Albright(D).
Bishop on April 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »