McCain loses temper with Hispanic immigration activists
posted at 2:55 pm on April 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
When we remind people that elections have consequences, we’re usually talking about the outrage that comes from appointments to the executive and judicial branches. They have other consequences on policy and legislative priorities, as John McCain “forcefully” reminded Hispanic immigration activists at a meeting last month. National Journal reports on the fallout today:
The meeting in the Capitol’s Strom Thurmond Room on March 11 was a Republican effort led by Sens. McCain of Arizona, John Thune of South Dakota, and Mel Martinez of Florida to reach out to Hispanics. But two people who attended the session say they were taken aback by McCain’s anger.
What began as a collegial airing of views abruptly changed when McCain spoke about immigration, according to these sources, who asked not to be identified for fear of retribution. Anonymity was also requested by a third source, who was not at the meeting but was told, independently of the other two, that McCain had displayed his notorious temper.
“He was angry,” one source said. “He was over the top. In some cases, he rolled his eyes a lot. There were portions of the meeting where he was just staring at the ceiling, and he wasn’t even listening to us. We came out of the meeting really upset.”
McCain’s message was obvious, the source continued: After bucking his party on immigration, he had no sympathy for Hispanics who are dissatisfied with President Obama’s pace on the issue. “He threw out [the words] ‘You people — you people made your choice. You made your choice during the election,’ ” the source said. “It was almost as if [he was saying] ‘You’re cut off!’ We felt very uncomfortable when we walked away from the meeting because of that.”
I don’t have much sympathy for McCain on his immigration policies. McCain thought that Hispanics would flock to his banner based on his embrace of most of their agenda. In the end, though, McCain and Barack Obama wound up at just about the same policy on immigration, making it a wash in the presidential election. Hispanics instead overwhelmingly supported Obama over McCain, 67%-31%, an even worse drubbing than George Bush got in either election. McCain had lectured Republicans for years about losing the Hispanic vote if we didn’t produce candidates sympathetic to amnesty or amnesty-lite programs, and he got humiliated by the failure of his argument in November.
I have even less sympathy for the people demanding his attention now. These are the same activists who convinced McCain that he could ride a Hispanic wave of support if he only adopted their policies. McCain fought with his own party to do so, and most of them abandoned him for Obama. Now they want to harangue them into taking up their cause again. I don’t blame McCain a bit for responding, in essence, by telling them to stuff it and start whining to Barack Obama instead.
Yid with Lid says another demographic should be paying attention to this lesson, as well:
Other Obama supporting interest groups should be aware what can happen when you vote against the candidate who works so hard for your cause and vote for the candidate who will harm your interests (like the 78% of the Jewish Vote).
Well, yeah.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
So the classic McCain temper has taken away the border-destroying savior.
And?
He’s a disgrace.
MadisonConservative on April 3, 2009 at 2:58 PM
hah when I first saw that pic it reminded me of eastwood in gran torino
offroadaz on April 3, 2009 at 2:59 PM
John McCain, border enforcement first advocate?
(I won’t hold my breath.)
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on April 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM
Hope he goes all Post Distress and snaps their illegal arms out of the sockets.
marklmail on April 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM
“you people…” That sounds a bit……
Vashta.Nerada on April 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Pander failure.
Maquis on April 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM
None of the people who McCain pandered to ended up supporting him, except the people who liked his pick of Palin.
zmdavid on April 3, 2009 at 3:02 PM
NOW he is upset???
ppfffhhhpppttt
sonofdy on April 3, 2009 at 3:02 PM
Luche pozna chem nikagda.
(Better late than never.)
Realist on April 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Y’know I voted for McCain… and I rapidly coming to loathe Obama… but there’s still a tiny inkling in the back of my mind that the right candidate won…
Skywise on April 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Racist? That’s not going to fly. Here’s one of his daughters.
amerpundit on April 3, 2009 at 3:06 PM
Is this his Obama “I won” moment? McCain: “I LOST!!”
Brat on April 3, 2009 at 3:06 PM
What was the point of the meeting, then? If you meet with “activists” you have to know going into the meeting that they are going to make demands. That’s what they do. It’s his job to listen to his constituents.
McCain is still a senator with responsibilities to govern based on his conscience and what’s best for the people of Arizona and the country. If he only adopted his immigration stance based on the promise of votes, then shame on him.
I suspect the real point of this story is to keep the public distracted from the terrible job the Obama administration and Democrat-controlled Congress are doing by putting the spotlight on Obama’s opponents. They need to keep people thinking that they dodged a bullet by not electing McCain and Palin.
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:06 PM
I just love paragraphs from news sources that are worded just like this one.
myrenovations on April 3, 2009 at 3:06 PM
Only now after it’s all over does he understand.
Vegi on April 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM
“You people…” lmao. Will the press pillory McGetalong like they did Ross Perot?
beatcanvas on April 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM
And with his election in 2010, I doubt Obama will find him an ally with amnesty. But this is Juan McVain so who knows?
Elric66 on April 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM
He may be a disgrace Mad Conserv. but he has a point. If you stick your neck out for someone, you got to bat for them, then they need to uphold their end of the bargain.
They made an enemy, and the Hispanics will learn a lesson that should have been learned long ago by these liberal domestic terrorists…don’t bite the hand that feeds you.
The Jews have to learn this also, as pointed out. They continue to back a party that could care less about them. When the conservatives finally wake up and say “you are on your own”, then they will see how fast Israel tumbles.
Want some historical proof? Look at the black society, once the most honest, faithful, society in the U.S. A lower crime rate then whites, less divorce then whites, more spiritual then whites…and in just a few decades of supporting the Democrats, look what has happened to their society, torn apart, uneducated, out of wed lock birth, high drop out, high crime.
It is right before their eyes…and so it will be for Hispanics. The dems need your vote, not you or your family. And they need the Jewish vote, not Israel…
Good for McCain…the best thing he has done is months, since picking Palin.
right2bright on April 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM
And right on cue…
I recommend you get your head examined and get that inkling excised.
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Time for acorn to have a chat with dear john.
L
letget on April 3, 2009 at 3:09 PM
…… = sarc
Vashta.Nerada on April 3, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Excellent…first the MSM turned on him, then the Hispanics.
right2bright on April 3, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Pander failure.
Maquis on April 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Looks like Johnny’ll now have to grin and (pander) bear it!
….
max1 on April 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM
They’re both big government’ers with little respect for liberty. Better I think that the Dems get associated with that, but McCain might have been better on spending. Who knows. He doesn’t much care for the First Amendment. To hell with the rest too, eh? McCrossTheAisle has no love for the constitution.
beatcanvas on April 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM
Hell hath no fury like
a womanun lechon del asno scorned.MB4 on April 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Here’s a thought. Maybe he actually means “you people”, and it’s not code for anything.
capitalist piglet on April 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
HA! Good.
By the way, he was humiliated by more than just his immigration argument failing.
The man is a tool and I hope we’re finally free of him.
John_Locke on April 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Where was this energy when McCain needed to win the election?
The whole Republican party and a VP candidate had to drag the old warrior across the finish line.
Meh. Respect his service, disdain his ego.
portlandon on April 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Like something Bryant Gumbel manufactured out of the blue almost 20 years ago to find a cudgel to beat Ross Perot with when it looked like Perot might have a shot.
Ed Driscoll on April 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM
bikermailman on April 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Sure, but McCain also should have realized who he was aligning himself with.
I’m with Ed on this. I have no sympathy for either and kinda enjoy the whole thing.
Esthier on April 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Tell me.. .which is smarter… blasting Hispanics like a whiny cry-baby after kowtowing to them for votes because they’re necessary to win future elections?
Or retrenching with your political party to come up with a strategy to reach out to the hispanic community with conservative ideals?
Face facts. McCain’s a whiny cry baby who will happily sell out his party if he’s being dissed.
Skywise on April 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM
The Republican abolition movement continues to pay dividends at the ballot box with the African American vote. Why should shamnesty be any different?
More proof that Big John was too unstable to be POTUS.
Valiant on April 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Reap what you sow immigration activists. McCain actually showed courage in trying to work on immigration reform (whatever you thought on the matter it took balls to buck his party that way) and took a drubbing from his base and party for it. Obama on the other hand betrayed both McCain and Kennedy on the matter and sided with his base. Now you’re pissed because the guy who didn’t fight for you wont put forth the policies you want. Deal. I would’ve reacted the same way McCain did if I were in his position. They had their chance now deal with your choice. McCain should refuse to even take calls from them if all they’re going to do is whine about how unfair the guy they picked is being.
Yes Jewish voters should be damn worried about their choice when they voted on what Obama said and not what he has actually done.
Zaggs on April 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Do you really think McCain would be making the number of gaffes, both large and small, that Obama’s been making? I don’t. I think McCain would have been able to assemble a competent team. More importantly, his presence as POTUS would not have emboldened our enemies abroad.
Obama looks like an inept fool each and every day and we are less safe as a result.
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM
I have come to realize that the Republican Party will continue to nominate the ‘deserving old guy’ (see Bob Dole who I believe would have been a great president BTW) in place of the better qualified principled newcomer. This is a inherent flaw in the party. I’m not sure if it is a knee jerk reaction to the lefts calls for change but it is really too bad.
LifeTrek on April 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Wow, its SHOCKING this guy lost the Presidential race. Thanks a lot all you people who couldn’t stomach a Mormon or a goofy Southerner.
Speedwagon82 on April 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM
McCain screwed up and lost the election because of it. He failed to be the right person for the right reasons. He gambled on gaining more leftist voters by pandering than he would lose by going against his base.
The Hispanics on the other hand knew that McCain reached out to them and they dissed him for Obama anyway. Now they want to whine to McCain?
I don’t think so. They are both losers.
Guardian on April 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM
McCain was undoubtedly the open borders candidate and would have made amnesty his number one priority. Too bad immigration activists didn’t figure that out.
aengus on April 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Vaya con dildos, Mac.
La perdiz por el pico si pierde.
(If you talk too much you’ll give yourself away.)
profitsbeard on April 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Somebody should have called for an exorcist.
MB4 on April 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM
McCain is right in the instance. “Bust a deal…face the wheel”–Mad Max: Beyond Thunder Dome
vsunited on April 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM
I really feel bad for McCain. He thought that appeasing “moderate liberals” would win him the election. He got in friendly with the press, he cozy’d up to illegals, he took a few shots at Bush.
Before running against Obama, McCain was the favorite of liberals everywhere.
What did it get him? When it counted, nothing.
It’s the same with Obama in Europe.
hawksruleva on April 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM
PUT HIM WITH THE OTHER YAANKEE MARICON!
*points at John Kerry.
Kai on April 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM
he lost more conservative voters than gained in Hispanic voters. nice math, GOP!
John the Libertarian on April 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM
Boo fuckin Hoo!! The people that probably voted for Obama want support from McCain!? And now feel rejected because he won’t give it!? Hilarious.. off
docdave on April 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM
I agree with you. McCain has a lot of baggage. But none of that elevates Obama in my mind. That’s the part of your post that had me worried. Obama is a dangerous president. I would much rather have an adult who sometimes loses his temper as CiC than have an inept Europe-loving fool.
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM
Johnnie McQueeg is just upset because he sold his party and his country down the river, and got nothing for it. Moral of the story, Johnnie-Boy, is don’t sell you party and you country down the river, next time…
gridlock2 on April 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM
Poor choice of words considering McCain’s experiences in Hanoi.
Might I suggest “Go Taliban” on them.
lasertex on April 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM
If McCain had won he would have rammed through Obama’s agenda out of racial guilt for thwarting the election of a black Presidency.
Also he would have told the bigots to shut up.
aengus on April 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM
Foreign policy? You’re right – McMyFriends had that one square. I voted for him, though I couldn’t stand him.
As for McAmnesty developing a competent team, he had lots of political and world experience, so he would have had every bit of the polish that Obama glaringly lacks. But safer? Not along the southern border.
beatcanvas on April 3, 2009 at 3:20 PM
Um, wrong. McCain did and has always voted his conscience. He is not nor ever has been an ultra conservative republican. Yet some people continue to freak anytime he acts in a non conservative way. he went with Kennedy for immigration reform because he, and others like myself, believed it to be right, not because it was politically expedient (he knew before hand he would take a hit for it). You may disagree with what he thinks and thats fine. But dont chalk it up to simply getting votes.
Zaggs on April 3, 2009 at 3:20 PM
I heard the other day that 52% of Catholics voted for Obama. Is that true?
Texas Gal on April 3, 2009 at 3:20 PM
They’re coming to take Juan away, ha-haaa.
They’re coming to take Juan away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa.
To the funny farm, where life is beautiful all the time and Juan will be happy
to see those nice young men in their clean white coats and they’re coming
to take Juan away, ha-haaa!!!
To the happy home, with trees and flowers and chirping birds and basket
weavers who sit and smile and twiddle their thumbs and toes and they’re
coming to take Juan away, ha-haa!!!
To the funny farm, where life is beautiful all the time……
- Napoleon XIV
MB4 on April 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM
There are people on ABC’s site all the time that have no idea that Republicans brought about 90% of the freedoms that African-Americans have in this country. I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama himself fit into that category.
Democrats supported slavery, supported Jim Crow laws, supported Dredd Scott, and used every trick they could find to stop or slow down the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It’s absurd that a living reminder of this heritage, Robert Byrd, still hold an office in the US Senate.
hawksruleva on April 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Hispanic activists, like most other people, vote for the party. Obama’s party is the one that caters to Hispanic activists, so it wouldn’t matter how far McCain personally favored them because the Republican Party doesn’t cater to them.
Speedwagon82 on April 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Pandering backfires aside, people voted based on race in this election.
We all know it. It’s not rational. it goes against everything we’ve learned from Dr. MLK, Jr.
But, hey, that’s what happened.
McCain wasn’t even in my top 3 going into the primaries, but it’s hard to ignore the race-based voting that went on in 2008.
bluelightbrigade on April 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Yid, unfortunately I have complete faith that American Jews will still overwhelmingly vote for The One in 2012. I mean, most of these Jews are of the Bagel and Lox variety and thats it.
Lance Murdock on April 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM
My sarc button looks like this: …..
Vashta.Nerada on April 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM
No offense intended, but you could just use “/sarc” instead…
bluelightbrigade on April 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
ANYONE could have beat Obama if they’d run on an anti-illegal alien platform. 85% feel strongly about this. Wait till grandmas start dying while waiting for surgeries that are going to illegals. This issue could be big for us in 2010.
marklmail on April 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
Too Baaaaaad for all of them. McCain lost while trying to out Democrat the Democrats and selling out his base to pander to Hispanics. Hispanics screwed him by voting ‘the One’. Hispanics got screwed by ‘the One’ since he did not throw open the borders like they think he promised. Lets hope Barry gets his come-upance and gets a “Come to Jesus” sitdown real soon. SCREW THEM ALL….
Kuffar on April 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
This is only meaningful if you view it in the context of the overall popular vote. Yes, McCain got a lower percentage than Bush, but he also lost the popular vote by a good amount and Bush won. Is it still lower when you account for that?
tneloms on April 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
Speakup on April 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM
He seems to be taunting Obama to take the issue on:
Pelosi and Obama will string the Hispanic vote along promising lots delivering not so much. It will be interesting to see whether Hispanics can be strung along as long as the black vote. Let’s face it it’s not like Obama is afraid to ram through other issues.
msmveritas on April 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM
Unfortunately, I am a McCain constituent here in Arizona (love Jon Kyl, though!)and I have never voted for him for senate. However, I felt I had no choice in the presidential election–lesser of two evils, you know. But it is my fervent hope and prayer that the Arizona Republican Party will find somebody to run against him in 2010. He really, really, really needs to retire!!!
Special K on April 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM
I wouldn’t be so sure. This entire fiasco is a mess. Obviously Obama isn’t handling it well, but I have little faith McCain would have been much better on the economy. Even if he would have been an improvement, it would only seem an improvement knowing what we do about how Obama has handled it, a benefit we only get with Obama in power.
Besides, I must say that I love the satisfaction of watching Lefties realize that even Obama can’t make the world love us, meaning maybe we aren’t the problem.
I know these lessons will be short-lived, but it’s still pleasant.
Esthier on April 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM
Ehh… We would have been screwed either way. McCain would now be opening the borders and playing patty-cake with the Democrats.. Either Obama or McCain would slide us into socialism, it’s just happening in different ways. (I also think McCain would be attacking the CEOs too, just like Obama)
Skywise on April 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM
im 2nd generation hispanic. open borders are not part of my agenda. i hate how they’ve defined us…
ernesto on April 3, 2009 at 3:27 PM
Heh, I just wtched Tropic Thunder last week and that reminds me of the following back and forth…
“you people”
“What do you mean, ‘you people?’
“No, what do YOU mean ‘you people’…?!?!”
Liberty or Death on April 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
I wonder if all the constant criticism coming by the minute from the millions of bloggers out there is finally getting to the pols on both sides. It’s getting to obama–that’s becoming increasingly obvious. I think they’ve decided since they can’t do anything right, they’ll just do what they want and damn the torpedoes. However, in this case, while he handled it badly, McCain does have a legitimate point.
jeanie on April 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
Like 91% of the black vote?
Hal-9000 on April 3, 2009 at 3:28 PM
Senator McCain never pandered to the amnesty crowd. He is a true believer in amnesty. He was pandering when he said he’d build the damn fence.
mchristian on April 3, 2009 at 3:29 PM
vapig on April 3, 2009 at 3:30 PM
Had McCain won:
* he would have formed an alliance with moderate and conservative Democrats which would undoubtedly reduced the dependency on deficit spending
* he would have selected cabinet members and advisors from a broader spectrum of experiences, including business, instead of relying on academics and political hacks
* he would have had a vice president who has experience cutting budgets and reforming government
And in terms of foreign policy, there’s absolutely no doubt we’d be safer militarily.
So in my mind there is no doubt that McCain would have been a better POTUS, flaws and all.
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM
You feel a little bad for the guy, then you realize he brought it on himself.
When the next McCain/Immigration story comes out and it’s like all the other ones, then we’ll know that McCain is indeed a whiny, cry-baby who expects payoffs for political favors.
If McCain can’t take from the election results (as stated in the post) that his immigratin “stance” is pure BS, then the guy deserved to lose and deserves all the scorn he has received from the Right on this issue.
catmman on April 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM
I always trust direct quotes from anonymous sources.
herrevery on April 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM
This is why I still don’t understand the “we need a bigger tent” mantra from a certain blogger here, Ace, Patterico and their ilk. Granted I love all 3 of them but da*n, isn’t that what McCain tried and where did that get him?
Only way to secure the latin vote is to out pander the Dems to the service workers union, which will never happen. Stick to you conservative principles and win elections.
broker1 on April 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM
McCain is correct when using the term “you people”.
They want to be treated as a special segregated constituency based on their status as illegal alien activists.
They choose to single themselves out as “hispanic” activists. For hispanics, by hispanics, to hispanics.
If they were a group of white Irishmen being activists only for white Irishmen, the term “you people” would apply just the same.
It’s not about race, it’s about people who CHOOSE to segregate themselves based on an un-american criteria.
roninacreage on April 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM
Kuffar on April 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM
your last three words sums it up very well.
Ghoul aid on April 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM
This is the angry, irrational old man you people voted for? What a a-hole. I feel sorry for Cindy – she deserves a boyfriend.
capitulus on April 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Word and phrases have consequences Senator McCain:
In response to a questioner in October 2008 who was suspicious of Obama and his motives?
“Senator Obama is a decent family man, citizen. YOU HAVE NOTHING TO BE SCARED OF IN AN OBAMA PRESIDENCY.”
McCain, what did you expect the Hispanics to do: you legitimized the Messiah as a viable option and Hispanic groups were already supporting him-what did you expect to happen?
technopeasant on April 3, 2009 at 3:39 PM
After moving heaven and earth to fly back to DC to vote FOR TARP?!
I don’t think so…
Skywise on April 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM
You prefer the guy who wanted to stay on the campaign trail and leave it all in the able hands of Nancy, Harry, and Bwarnwey?
Y-not on April 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Of course. McCain worked way too hard and tried to walk both sides. That was his problem.
He can’t blame anyone else for it, or his short temper.
Ryan Gandy on April 3, 2009 at 3:43 PM
You mean the “sourced from thin air” quotes? ;)
Maquis on April 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Didn’t La Raza get a bunch of money from the “Stimulus Package”………..
…………… what are they complaining about?
Seven Percent Solution on April 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Al a Rush Limbaugh. Dangerous phrase. Only when Rush uses it, you know it’s to lampoon. Not so much with Senator Palpatine here. I dare say he means it as it sounds.
juanito on April 3, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Prominent
Audience
Nudging a
Deliberate
Electoral
Response
technopeasant on April 3, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Looks like an inept fool? You’re too kind.
jdkchem on April 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM
This is all that matters. Whatever good McCain may still be worth, these activists have no business insisting–let alone asking–that McCain expend any political capital on their behalf. They got the boy they voted for, so they should get they protest signs and line up outside the White House.
Obama won, while McCain belongs to the party that’s in a decided minority of both houses of Congress. Hispanics, start elbowing Code Pinkers for space on the sidewalk outside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. How ya like your boy now?
BuckeyeSam on April 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM
What difference is it what McCain did? Either before or after the election. Illegal immigration continues on the same pace as before.
Diamondback, Timber, Sidewinder……all the same critter.
Limerick on April 3, 2009 at 3:48 PM
McCain and his daughter should just go home and salvage what they can of what little credibility they have left.
GT on April 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM
You are sympathetic to illegal alien supporters? You call a fellow who shot them down an irrational old man?
Shoot! He gave them just what they deserved!
vapig on April 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM
As opposed to the irrational, arrogant, inept, lying moron in office? Yes
jdkchem on April 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM
McCain is a fraud. I hope J.D. Hayworth hands McCain his head in the Arizona Primaries next year.
this is the SAME John McShamnesty who had his constituants removed from a audience in Arizona….
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1073039/dont_ask_mccain/
nelsonknows on April 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
That’s a Dem for you. “She should cheat on him.” Sweetie, she writes the checks. John McCain made a good match; some people still begrudge him for it. But Cindy McCain is a good, kind and honest person. She’d leave him before she’d destroy their relationship with infidelities.
chunderroad on April 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
While I may not agree with McCain’s immigration position, I can understand him being p*ssed. Did the activists expect him to still fight his own party after they basically gave him no support?
So McCain’s supposed to accept their non-support because Latinos were unhappy with Republicans in general?
katiejane on April 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Another brilliant post, Ed. I don’t care for McCain. I really don’t care for the man as a politician. I still do not enjoy seeing him twist like this. McCain could never sell amnesty for illegal immigrants to conservatives, no matter how it was packaged. His anger is misplaced. The illegal immigration activists have not changed their position, it makes one question Senator McCain’s position on the issue. Is this country first?
*** If he had the courage of his convictions, he would remain standing on the proud progressive Republican bandwagon with his daughter.
Angry Dumbo on April 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Why doesn’t anyone say what McCain would have done differently from Obama. For instance
. He wouldn’t be talking about cutting defense spending and pulling our forces unilaterally from the mideast.
. He wouldn’t be pandering to Iran and other muslim nations.
. He wouldn’t be supporting and promoting abortion.
. He wouldn’t be in favor of more gun control.
. He probably wouldn’t fire and/or coerce business CEOs.
. He would be more knowledgable about the workings of the government.
I’m sure there are other significant differences too and I believe those differences are important enough to make McCain a far better choice than Obama.
docdave on April 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »