I guess GM found their new board of directors
posted at 3:12 pm on April 2, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Barack Obama fired GM CEO Rick Wagoner this week, and has begun to push for the auto company to shuffle its board. It looks as though GM has stumbled onto just the right candidates, ones that will get approval on the floor of Congress. Why? They’ve started reporting to the Senate. A source on Capitol Hill forwarded the first status report from GM to their new governmental masters:
Dear Senator:
With so much happening this week related to GM and the automotive industry, I wanted to call your attention to a few important items. Going forward, I commit to sending you regular updates to ensure you have the latest information about the progress we are making toward reinventing our company.
March Sales
GM sales were announced yesterday and while the numbers are down 45% compared to last year, they are beginning to trend up compared to February 2009. In March, seven of eight GM brands saw total sales increases compared to February with total volume up 23 percent, or more than 29,000 cars, crossovers and trucks. One reason for this uptick in sales is the leadership shown by all of you to help stabilize the industry and stimulate demand. With the launch of GM’s Total Confidence program, the government backing of domestic warranties and GMAC’s announcement on additional availability of funds for consumer lending (and accepting applications under a 621 CB score), we hope to see volume continue to build into the spring selling season.
I’d like to call your attention to sales of GM hybrid vehicles; we sold a total of 1,612 hybrids in March, illustrating the wide range of hybrid product offerings available. We now offer the Chevrolet Malibu, Tahoe and Silverado, GMC Yukon and Sierra, Cadillac Escalade, Saturn Aura and Vue hybrids. So far, in 2009, GM has delivered 3,622 hybrid vehicles.
You can help improve sales by enacting fleet modernization legislation. Currently, thirteen countries have adopted such an incentive policy to stimulate vehicle sales. GM strongly believes a fleet modernization incentive for consumers would jump start sales and help replace the current auto fleet with cleaner, more fuel efficient vehicles. We look forward to your support in helping bring forward thoughtful legislation in this area.
GM Progress Report Submission to UST
GM submitted a progress report to US Treasury on March 31 as a follow up to our February 17 submission. General Motors continues to reinvent itself, making important and noteworthy progress on multiple fronts. Since February 17:
- Buick has displaced Lexus as Number 1 in J.D. Power’s annual Vehicle Dependability Study
- General Motors has become the global benchmark for workplace safety
- Chevrolet has launched the all-new Camaro, providing 29 mpg on the highway using GM’s award-winning SIDI V6 engine, with final preparations being made for the launches of the all-new Chevrolet Equinox, GMC Terrain, Buick Lacrosse and Cadillac SRX crossover
- Select U.S. media drove prototype Chevrolet Volt models, with production launch on track for the fourth quarter of 2010
- Employee attrition programs, a key Restructuring Plan component, are running ahead of schedule
Overall cost reduction efforts are running ahead of schedule, resulting in better- than-Plan performance in the first two months of 2009, and the deferral of the $2 billion loan request previously planned for March. We look forward to working with the Task Force in completing a deeper, speedier and sustainable restructuring.
You can read a full copy of the March 30 GM progress report by clicking here.
Automotive Task Force Findings
Finally, after weeks of intense investigation, on March 30 the Presidents’ Automotive Task Force issued their findings related to General Motors. While not all of their findings about our viability were positive, they did call out several areas where progress has been made.
The following excerpt is taken directly from the Task Force document titled “Determination of GM Viability” dated March 30, 2009:
General Motors is in the early stages of an operational turnaround in which GM has made material progress in a number of areas:
- Purchasing: GM has organized its purchasing globally, with its purchasing organization taking advantage of GM’s global scale, and has put into place a rigorous, metric-oriented approach to drive supplier quality and cost improvements.
- Product design: GM has refined its product design process to create global vehicle platforms, thus allowing GM to reduce engineering costs and improve the content of its cars. These global platforms leverage the scale of the business and allow GM to amortize product development costs over a large range of models. GM has also, since 2005, focused on customer needs, interior designs, styling and quality to provide more attractive products. Examples of successes of this initiative include the 2008 North American Car of the Year Chevy Malibu and the 2008 Motor Trend Car of the Year Cadillac CTS (though they constitute a modest share of GM’s portfolio today).
- Manufacturing: GM has worked to create greater flexibility within its facilities, allowing for increased capacity utilization and an enhanced ability to spread its significant fixed costs across a broader car base.
- Brand rationalization: The recently announced decisions to divest or shut down Saab, Saturn and Hummer, while late, were important steps in reducing the Company’s brand portfolio and allowing it to focus its financial and human resources on a smaller number of higher quality brands.
- Dealer network: GM has been eliminating dealers from markets where it is oversaturated, as well as eliminating dealers who are either unprofitable or create a poor customer experience.
During the next 60 days, GM will continue to address the tough issues to improve the long-term viability of the company. We are fully committed to making this successful. We owe that to the GM community, to our customers, and to the U.S. taxpayers, who are providing support during this exceptionally challenging time.
As always, please feel free to call if you have any questions or ideas about how we can better work together to reach our common goal of building a stronger, more competitive American automotive industry.
======
I’ll leave off the names and phone numbers. I loved the part where GM mentions that “not all of their findings about our viability were positive”. No kidding. Maybe they should have done that viability study before investing $14 billion into GM, huh?
It seems more than strange when a private corporation has to issue status reports to the Senate rather than to its stockholders. Of course, the Senate arguably represents their largest stockholder, thanks to bailout mania.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
How soon before we see the new GM economy car, the Chevy Entitlement, roll off the lines as a freebie to lower-income families?
Nethicus on April 2, 2009 at 3:15 PM
Not to go off topic, but who was the moron Republican calling for the Prez to fire Gettlefinger?
Knucklehead on April 2, 2009 at 3:15 PM
I just want to throw up.
That’s all I want to do lately.
yellow_railroad on April 2, 2009 at 3:16 PM
Is Congress going to impose strict new guidelines restricting the amount of smoke that GM
carsstatus reports are blowing…up the Senate’s ass?DrAllecon on April 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Send a photo of it to congress
LimeyGeek on April 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Yes, more loans to people with bad credit. That’ll work out well.
After 70 years, I’m glad they finally got around to that.
lorien1973 on April 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM
It’s like Jack Nicholson at the end of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”. Fixed and compliant. To think this was the company that made the corvette and the camaro. Someone put a pillow over GM’s face.
AubieJon on April 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM
I will not buy a GM product EVER again.
That new Toyota Pickup is looking very good now.
Offshore_Drilling on April 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM
I’m going to a tea party on April, 15th, but, I wonder if it will make any difference at all with our elected officials. I hope its not for nothing.
cjs1943 on April 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM
Lucky you. I’ve had nothing but projectile diarrhea lately.
cntrlfrk on April 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM
” Bow down before the one’s you serve, you’re going to get what you deserve.” NIN
Come to think of it, that song would work well in the Obama bows down to the Saudi King thread.
Have a great day!
Agent of the Cross on April 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM
How many shares do “we” own? These are common, voting shares, I presume. What was the vote breakdown of the board that authorized this issue of new shares? If there are no shares securing the investment, “we” are debt-holders only, like other bond-holders or lenders. Otherwise, we have nationalized GM and Chrysler. I wish Dear Leader would clarify “our” ownership interest in these corporations so I can figure out what the “rules” are. I presume their competitors would welcome some clarification, as well.
littleguy on April 2, 2009 at 3:25 PM
Is this really happening? Now when someone of Romney’s stature in the money world says Obama is not completely off base I do have to pause… but a private company reporting to CONGRESS! That just makes my blood boil.
I wish this was just over already.
petunia on April 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM
cjs1943, The more people (see) these people protesting, that will plant seeds in their minds. It is a plan to get the attention of the elected officials, but more importantly, getting other people to notice, and perhaps participate in other protests.
Offshore_Drilling on April 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM
It won’t. It is.
It seems that only mailing a tea bag to them directly gets their fires burning. And that’s cuz you might be a terrorist if you do so.
lorien1973 on April 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM
When do the electric coffins debut?
tarpon on April 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM
I know the feeling exactly.
We live in a world without honor, without integrity, and without maturity.
Daddy-O on April 2, 2009 at 3:27 PM
A chicken in every pot, and a car in every garage…
After TAXES I can’t afford the garage or the car. Thankfully I can still afford the chicken, but for how long?
soulsirkus on April 2, 2009 at 3:27 PM
What is more chilling is that this is the first time a majority of the Senators have even heard of, yet read a companies Status Report……………..
Seven Percent Solution on April 2, 2009 at 3:27 PM
When does John Galt appear?
PersonalLiberty on April 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM
Was that a coincidence that a Chevy ad came up while viewing this page?
I need to remember to send my annual personal financial report to the IRS this weekend.
WashJeff on April 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM
Or heard of a little concept called “private ownership” apparently.
petunia on April 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM
Boy, those guys at GM really are dopey. They send a report to the senate, thinking someone there will actually take the time to read it.
fogw on April 2, 2009 at 3:30 PM
What’ more shocking to me everyday is the American People do nothing. Are we all just in shock? Or has the Years of Liberal teachings in our Colleges paid off? What a dark day looming for us..
Conservative Ivan on April 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Mannn…
Are curb feelers going to be standard on all GM makes now??
DamnYankee on April 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM
If GM doesn’t take the money, they’re f’ed. If the government just gave GM more bailout money without qualifications, they’d get slammed giving away money without any qualifications.
From what I’ve heard, while Wagoner was well-liked, the new CEO is a ball buster — a “if anyone can turn GM around, it’s this guy” kind of thing.
But, again, GM doesn’t have to take the money. And the government doesn’t want to give money to a company unless it believes it won’t squander it.
Tom_Shipley on April 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Conservative Ivan on April 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Many of us are doing something, we’re just not advertising it. There are few pols listening to us, from either side, and you can see the shiit-storm coming.
Bishop on April 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
The Treasury will now conduct employee compensation reviews for all 1,500,000+ employees who work at TARP recipient companies if that bill goes through… what could go wrong?
gatorboy on April 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
That’s odd. I guess they just like to spend money on government run programs that squander it.
myrenovations on April 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
FIFY – seems that we’ve heard it all before
gatorboy on April 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
The bailout should never have happened. GM should either sink or swim, and if they swim it should be through investors’ money or through selling a product the consumer can afford.
AubieJon on April 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I don’t want to give money to the government because I don’t believe that they won’t squander it.
For instance, on a “bailout” of a death spiral car company that now has the worst possible management ever – Congressional Democrats.
Incompetent and corrupt Democrats have the Outhouse Touch – everything they touch, turns to crap.
GM will be on the ash heap of history within two years and along with it, a fortune in taxpayer funds. Wasted by the absolutely worthless, corrupt and incompetent Democrat Party.
NoDonkey on April 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Wake up america! Congress sits high in their lofty perch to pick the winners and losers by using OUR money and they pounce on the perception of mis-spent money as long as it is in one of these ‘extra-constitutional’ affairs, but turn a blind eye to their own systemic waste.
Send these clowns in DC a bag of dog food. They’re obviously too good to eat their own dog food, so if we must send it to them, so be it.
gatorboy on April 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Boy, GM is really bending over and gripping its ankles on this one. The humility of having to
report tobeg from Senators, who couldn’t find their a** with a flashlight.redfoxbluestate on April 2, 2009 at 3:45 PM
I think the government had a role to play but it should have been more to keep the state and people afloat while the companies got their acts together.
Didn’t some Presidents intervene in union nogotiations and stuff in the past? The American car industry is important for national security purposes as well so it it a vital industry and some government involvement was important. But keeping it from bankruptcy was stupid. Bankruptcy is the government mechanism set up exactly for circumstances like this. So avoiding it was just stupid.
It just flies in the face of logic to think GM needed just a little money and all would be well.
petunia on April 2, 2009 at 3:50 PM
And yet it seems that people think this is a good idea and decided to put money back into the stock market? Wow.. maybe they don’t yet realize that “mark to market” means more money taken from the taxpayer to prop up banks that operate with no reserves… and this GM deal means the government can and WILL intervene in private businesses.
Geithner said he’d suggest that the CEOs of other companies resign if the situation was right. That should have every CEO looking for a nice
vacationGalt home outside the US.popularpeoplesfront on April 2, 2009 at 3:50 PM
I think Congress thinks all money not in their pockets is mis-spent.
petunia on April 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Sow when do they start building the Chevy CoGalt?
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on April 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Bankruptcy is the government mechanism set up exactly for circumstances like this. So avoiding it was just stupid.
Actually, I think the Obama administration and the new CEO both agree GM should declare bankruptcy, but they want properly plan for it. I think this is a similar to Bush’s philosophy on the matter.
Tom_Shipley on April 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Alpo starts with the same letter as Anthrax. You’d better re-think your idea.
myrenovations on April 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
I hope their sales plummet.
ctmom on April 2, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Translation: Can you please pass some laws making other companies buy our cars. ie the “Dog eat Dog rule.
FMAC on April 2, 2009 at 3:57 PM
This is all a joke, right? Just a joke.
It was just a joke last November:
The Pelosi GTxi SS/Rt Sport Edition
Not a joke anymore?
ZenDraken on April 2, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Not quite. Dubya had no political reason to protect the UAW during bankruptcy proceedings.
a capella on April 2, 2009 at 4:02 PM
What a deceptive report. 1,600 hybrids means they need to stop building them. They usually stop when numbers are that low. It may be 1 third of those went to the kansas governor because she just spent some money on state employees on her way out of town to avoid an overdraft statement.
seven on April 2, 2009 at 4:04 PM
That’s odd, because in order for a company to get money from Unca Sam, it had to have squandered it.
lorien1973 on April 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM
GM has had years to “properly plan” for its inevitable bankruptcy. The handwriting has been on the wall for this company for a very long time. And the fact that Obama’s idiotic policy re GM may be similar to Bush’s idiocy on this subject is hardly a selling point.
AZCoyote on April 2, 2009 at 4:12 PM
They could’ve done so for free months ago – if it weren’t for the “horror stories” of 3 million lost jobs if it happened. Now $14 billion have gone into the hole. Gubmint in action.
lorien1973 on April 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM
There has to be gargantuan conflict of interest violations here.
As it stands, the government can manipulate laws to favor the company it now controls; on one hand, it can pass legislation to require all cars to acheive 50 mpg by 2020. One the other hand, it has the ability to fund research for the company it owns almost without limit using tax dollars. The competing companies cannot match the research funding, nor can they achieve the required standard.
This is not democracy.
BobMbx on April 2, 2009 at 4:16 PM
You dare question the command economy?
lorien1973 on April 2, 2009 at 4:18 PM
Emphasis mine. SNORT!
I saw a young lady at a stop sign yesterday, sitting in an old clunker, windows down, eating potato chips that she probably bought at the “quick mart.” She had an Obama ‘08 Si Se Puede bumper sticker. I’m thinking, you know I think a lot of people are going to be just fine with socialism. Even out the score, they’ll be thinking.
Mr_Magoo on April 2, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Grovel before your mandarin betters
DamnCat on April 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM
I hear ya. My cube mate was running around yelling “the sky is falling – 3 million jobs will be lost” and now he is sitting there saying “yeah, they are useless, bankrupt ‘em.”
Pfft.
Mr_Magoo on April 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Amen! The only American car company I’d buy from right now is Ford.
DamnCat on April 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Oh, we paid much more than the market cap of the company. We could’ve easily BOUGHT GM. But instead we just gave them money. So there’s a bunch of stockholders with zero control over their company, and whose stock value is pretty much stuck, thanks to the looming threat of bankruptcy.
hawksruleva on April 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM
What is fleet modernization legislation? Does that mean the government is going to rquire me to drive a new vehicle?
matthew26 on April 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM
I’m surprised the salutation didn’t say Dear Leader.
Maquis on April 2, 2009 at 4:40 PM
It’ll be like Cuba. I could see Obama and the idiots in Congress limiting what sort of cars we can buy.
No one will want the overpriced, ugly tin cans Congress will want us to buy, so we’ll all keep our old cars and the new ones will rot.
Then they’ll have to come up with some tax scheme to force us to buy the crappy cars we don’t want.
These people are so easy to predict and these idiotic socialist schemes have been tried so many times and have failed so many times in the past, it’s a wonder people don’t already know what’s going to happen when the Obama regime collapses.
NoDonkey on April 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM
Never thought I’d say this, but Ford’s looking better all the time.
Chaz706 on April 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM
No. It means the government is going to legislate the purchase of “green” vehicles for US government agencies. Remarkably, they’ve got the inside track on an auto manufacturer who’s looking for work!
This way, through law, the libtards can continue their incestuous relationship with the unions by owning and operating GM, and fund each and every future union demand for more money with tax dollars.
Why, do you ask, do the unions refuse to give concessions to GM now? They’re about to get new management that loves to pay higher union wages.
BobMbx on April 2, 2009 at 4:46 PM
That explains why the Chinese parts are the first ones to break, and why the aftermarket ones(from China) break even faster.
Depends on if they can make affordable muscle and not oversized golf carts as seen in Europe and Asia.
I don’t think we’re going to get tin cans, that’s what the Far East makes.
sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM
How many concessions is enough? They’ve given a lot.
sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM
I own two Fords right now. One is a ‘99, the other is a 2002. I just dropped about $1500 on the older one for some needed parts and to fix some nuisance items. I figured I better start replacing some older parts now while 1) I can still find them, and 2) I can still afford them.
I will not buy a new car ever again. Cuba-like is correct. Better stock up on parts now.
BobMbx on April 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Not much different than Lockheed Martin, Boeing, or the various others who have “inside tracks” to the government.
That, and I believe Boeing does have labor unions as well. I wonder if they’d get railed on if they were in Detroit as well.
sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 4:51 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
BobMbx on April 2, 2009 at 4:52 PM
Most likely the same situation here, as I’ve got a 2001 of the former Oldsmobile division of GM. Shortstar equipped, but very environmentalist hostile.
sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 4:55 PM
How many concessions
isare enough? They’ve given a lot.sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM
Johan Klaus on April 2, 2009 at 4:56 PM
I have got to go now. I have got to send my company sales figures to congress.
Johan Klaus on April 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM
Sounds like you want the days where it’d be no problem to recreate the Battle of the Overpass.
sethstorm on April 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM
They built my Vega when they had that smaller number of “quality” brands.
After all, isn’t their slogon “The name goes on before the quality goes in”? Or was it “Quality is Job 2″?
I can’t remember. Did GM ever mention quality?
unclesmrgol on April 2, 2009 at 5:10 PM
In the sub-headline you make a reference to GM having 100 members on their board of directors.
However, until Coleman and his lawyers stop obstructing things, there are just 99 on the board.
orange on April 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM
GM too big to fail, too stupid to live.
billreed627 on April 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM
GM unsuccessfully tried to horn in on Fords’ trademark slogan with “Quality is someone else’s job”, but they lost a copyright suit to Ford.
BobMbx on April 2, 2009 at 5:28 PM
There is no way the Democrats & Obama are going to let GM die off.
Since Obama & Congress got over involved in GM, The Unions are laughing, GM managers are slapping each other on the back in congratulations.
After 60 days Obama will start pouring the money into GM to keep all those Union votes on the Democrat side.
albill on April 2, 2009 at 5:43 PM
i love GMC’s i guess i will learn to love a ford.
wade underhile on April 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM
Comment pages: