Oh my: Dem strategists set to give Palin the Limbaugh treatment

The flyer is actually a very good GotV strategy because it bundles Palin with Rush and Bush, extremely unpopular figures with democrats, moderates and independents.
Bush is still extremely unpopular with the country as a whole.
Palin tried unsuccessfully to distance herself from Bush in the election run-up and then blamed the McCain/Palin loss on Bush.
Here is another good viral meme.
I know you guyz don’t dig Sir Richard, but he is an extremely smart guy.
He famously said…..

Memes are competitive.

Your memes are not competitive in the current environment.
How do you fix that?

strangelet on March 31, 2009 at 12:41 PM

what she said…

November 10, 2008
Palin says Bush record led to GOP loss
Posted: 08:05 PM ET

Palin told Alaska reporters the Republican ticket could not overcome the headwinds.

(CNN) – Sarah Palin told local reporters in Alaska that unhappiness with the Bush administration’s Iraq war policy and spending record were responsible for the GOP ticket’s defeat this year.

“I think the Republican ticket represented too much of the status quo, too much of what had gone on in these last eight years, that Americans were kind of shaking their heads like going, wait a minute, how did we run up a $10 trillion debt in a Republican administration?” Palin told the Anchorage Daily News and Alaska’s KTUU Channel 2.

“How have there been blunders with war strategy under a Republican administration? If we’re talking change, we want to get far away from what it was that the present administration represented and that is to a great degree what the Republican Party at the time had been representing. So people desiring change I think went as far from the administration that is presently seated as they could. It’s amazing that we did as well as we did.”

strangelet on March 31, 2009 at 1:43 PM

The answer to both comrade Lenin’s memes and comrade Obama’s memes is to continue to speak the truth. The environment is already changing under the crushing weight of reality.

littleguy on March 31, 2009 at 1:18 PM

So you are saying the truth is competitive?
Then I think you have to start telling the truth then.
Like truth in Iraq?
And the truth about the cause of the Econopalypse.
And the truth about stemcells.
And the truth about SSM.
And the truth about Palin.

strangelet on March 31, 2009 at 1:53 PM

/sigh

read the whole thing then.

Anyone who tells you that the Iraq war is over should be forced to memorize this paragraph from the Sunday edition of the Washington Post:

As Apache helicopter gunships cruised above Baghdad’s Fadhil neighborhood, former Sunni insurgents fought from rooftops and street corners against American and Iraqi forces, according to witnesses, the Iraqi military and police. At least 15 people were wounded in the gunfights, which lasted several hours. By nightfall, the street fighters had taken five Iraqi soldiers hostage.

That is Iraq 2009. Does it sound peaceful to you? Does it seem like the political questions vexing Iraq have been solved?

Here is a quote of the day:

If they don’t release Adil Mashadani, all the Awakening in Iraq will rise up like our uprising today,” he [a local Awakening Council spokesman] added.”

Along with the bombings in west Baghdad lately, the street fighting over the weekend doesn’t quite form a trend. But it points toward one possible series of events. That is, the Maliki government is putting the screws to the Awakening movement (for those who just arrived, that’s a mainly Sunni group of about 100,000 people, many of them former insurgents, who in late 2006 and 2007 arrived at ceasefires with the U.S. military presence in Iraq). The American plan was to integrate about 20,000 members of Awakening groups into Iraqi security forces, and help the rest find other work. Meantime, the Baghdad government was supposed to take over the payments to the groups, which when I last checked totaled about $30 million a month.

But the Shiite-dominated Baghdad government never really liked the idea. Indeed, the first deals were cut by U.S. officials behind the back of the Iraqi government. So Maliki’s guys are:

Arresting some leaders of the “Sons of Iraq” (the American term for Awakening forces)
Attacking others
Bringing only 5,000 of the ex-insurgents into the Iraqi security forces
And stiffing others on pay, with some complaining they haven’t been paid in weeks or even months
I think Maliki’s gambit is to crack down on the Sunnis while American forces are still available in sufficient numbers to back him up. This is a turning into a test of strength, Sunni vs. Shiite.

There’s more. If the Awakening fighting spreads, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Moqtada al-Sadr’s Shiite militia re-emerge. I’ve always thought the Sunni Awakening forced him to go to ground, because he didn’t want to be the only guy taking on American forces. But if the Sunnis are on the attack again, it might be game on for him as well. I am reminded of Ambassador Ryan Crocker’s worry, expressed in my new book and elsewhere, that the future of Iraq was something like Lebanon. That is, it has a government, but it is shaky, and there is violence in the streets, with some political parties having armed wings that are outside the control of the government.

The Washington Post’s Anthony Shadid calls this all “potentially worrisome.” When Shadid begins to worry, we all should. He’s the guy who back in early 2004 used to encourage me to take taxis around Baghdad.

Proven provider John McCreary of NightWatch fame is even more emphatic:

This is a pre-cursor of the second round of the Sunni-Shia civil war to follow.”

Question of the day: What should I say the next time someone tells me the surge “worked”?

strangelet on March 31, 2009 at 2:52 PM

Geministorm on March 31, 2009 at 2:43 PM

It was never about what Palin actually read..or even what supreme court cases she disagreed with….it was about her ability to answer questions in realtime, kind of a basic neccessity for the High Office.
She failed.

strangelet on March 31, 2009 at 2:59 PM