<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN falls to third place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free rape videos.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2111023</link>
		<dc:creator>Free rape videos.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2111023</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rape....&lt;/strong&gt;

Rape stories. Free rape porn. Japanese rape. Rape of nanking. Gang rape. Rape websites with screams....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rape&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Rape stories. Free rape porn. Japanese rape. Rape of nanking. Gang rape. Rape websites with screams&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoo sex sex.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2102309</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoo sex sex.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2102309</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Zoo sex sex....&lt;/strong&gt;

Animals sex zoo. Zoo sex. Zoo sex stories....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zoo sex sex&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Animals sex zoo. Zoo sex. Zoo sex stories&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Rachel Maddow Without the Sound</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2043625</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Rachel Maddow Without the Sound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2043625</guid>
		<description>[...] left-wing bias, I think Maddow&#8217;s show is going to have some staying power.  But, for MSNBC (yet not for FoxNews), Olbermann has some pretty good numbers, so anger does seem to sell to a certain segment of our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] left-wing bias, I think Maddow&#8217;s show is going to have some staying power.  But, for MSNBC (yet not for FoxNews), Olbermann has some pretty good numbers, so anger does seem to sell to a certain segment of our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemonocracy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2042157</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemonocracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2042157</guid>
		<description>I like Lou Dobbs on CNN, he is an original voice.  Larry King bores me and always seems to have fossilized old celebrities on his show and Campbell Brown is a joke with her &quot;No Bias, No Bull&quot; slogan.  She questioned Palin&#039;s mothering skills for accepting the VP job and appraches every issue from the left.  Other than Wolf Blitzer I can&#039;t think of anyone else who is on that channel.  People don&#039;t want the subtle bias, they want either outright bias or heated exchanges.  

Keep Dobbs, get rid of King and get rid of Brown.  Put in a Hannity and Colmes style format with two charismatic hosts and try to do actual straight news.  To compete with the Fox report they should throw in a tabloid journalism show for the 7 o&#039;clock hour.  Something similar to the old Inside Edition and Hard Copy shows of the early &#039;90s.  

Someone mentioned they should pull more from their Atlanta roots, I agree with this.  Southernize the station a bit, make it something different.  If they can actually put out straight news with a Georgian flavor, people may tune in.  They should also try and steal Scarborough from MSNBC, he is a straight shooter and one of the few Republicans out there who called out Bush and the then GOP controlled congress on deficit spending and earmarks.

On another note, I have to say that Hannity&#039;s new show is surprisingly entertaining.  He recites his usual talking points for the first half hour, but then has a pretty balanced panel for the second half hour and it makes for a fast paced and fun show.  I have to admit I am surprised, it is much more enjoyable than his radio show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Lou Dobbs on CNN, he is an original voice.  Larry King bores me and always seems to have fossilized old celebrities on his show and Campbell Brown is a joke with her &#8220;No Bias, No Bull&#8221; slogan.  She questioned Palin&#8217;s mothering skills for accepting the VP job and appraches every issue from the left.  Other than Wolf Blitzer I can&#8217;t think of anyone else who is on that channel.  People don&#8217;t want the subtle bias, they want either outright bias or heated exchanges.  </p>
<p>Keep Dobbs, get rid of King and get rid of Brown.  Put in a Hannity and Colmes style format with two charismatic hosts and try to do actual straight news.  To compete with the Fox report they should throw in a tabloid journalism show for the 7 o&#8217;clock hour.  Something similar to the old Inside Edition and Hard Copy shows of the early &#8217;90s.  </p>
<p>Someone mentioned they should pull more from their Atlanta roots, I agree with this.  Southernize the station a bit, make it something different.  If they can actually put out straight news with a Georgian flavor, people may tune in.  They should also try and steal Scarborough from MSNBC, he is a straight shooter and one of the few Republicans out there who called out Bush and the then GOP controlled congress on deficit spending and earmarks.</p>
<p>On another note, I have to say that Hannity&#8217;s new show is surprisingly entertaining.  He recites his usual talking points for the first half hour, but then has a pretty balanced panel for the second half hour and it makes for a fast paced and fun show.  I have to admit I am surprised, it is much more enjoyable than his radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMAO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ignorning the Feast and Fighting Over Crumbs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2041446</link>
		<dc:creator>IMAO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ignorning the Feast and Fighting Over Crumbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2041446</guid>
		<description>[...] CNN has now fallen to third place behind MSNBC. The problem the FOX rivals are going to have is that there have always been more conservatives [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNN has now fallen to third place behind MSNBC. The problem the FOX rivals are going to have is that there have always been more conservatives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2040270</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2040270</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Proof that America just doesn’t want to be lied to.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Murdoch&#039;s network and newspaper would say otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Proof that America just doesn’t want to be lied to.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Murdoch&#8217;s network and newspaper would say otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2040265</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2040265</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Ash on March 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You forgot Lou Dobbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Ash on March 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>You forgot Lou Dobbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy_Peabody</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2039947</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy_Peabody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2039947</guid>
		<description>If only CNN had kept Connie Chung.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only CNN had kept Connie Chung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csdeven</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2039148</link>
		<dc:creator>csdeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2039148</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;More Wolf Blitzer!

Firebird on March 28, 2009 at 1:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

AND more cow bell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More Wolf Blitzer!</p>
<p>Firebird on March 28, 2009 at 1:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>AND more cow bell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2039133</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2039133</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In case I didn’t make myself clear, I don’t watch CNN, and I don’t think intelligent people watch any of the cable news networks.

DaveS on March 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So ... which televised news programs DO YOU watch?
Shades of Palin&#039;s, &quot;Which magazines do you read?&quot; question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In case I didn’t make myself clear, I don’t watch CNN, and I don’t think intelligent people watch any of the cable news networks.</p>
<p>DaveS on March 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So &#8230; which televised news programs DO YOU watch?<br />
Shades of Palin&#8217;s, &#8220;Which magazines do you read?&#8221; question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True_King</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038852</link>
		<dc:creator>True_King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038852</guid>
		<description>CNN is terrible. Worse than MSNBC, at least MSNBC is openly liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN is terrible. Worse than MSNBC, at least MSNBC is openly liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038765</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038765</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to jump in and say that I think terryann&#039;s analysis earlier in this thread is exactly how I see the situation.  The MORE partisan the host is perceived I believe the BETTER the show does.  I disagree that if CNN were even to theoretically reach the promised land of actual and perceived neutrality that it would be a success.  The audience appears to want to watch the partisans and to watch arguments/opinion/analysis.  If someone created a dry newswire type show that just reported fact without the partisan opinion I think it would fail.
__
     Since Fox is killing everyone in the ratings by such a large margin I look at their numbers separately.  From that you see that the more partisan and opinion driven shows (O&#039;Reilly, Hannity and Beck) are the top with the less opinion driven partisan shows faring worse (Greta, Smith, Baier).  In the race between MSNBC and CNN the more partisan shows, Olbermann, Maddow are beating the less opinion driven shows.  And one of the worst ratings-wise?  Brown, a show, irrespective of how it actually is, is a show sold as a straight news show, with an attempt (completely successful or not) as a straight news show.  Of note, a HLN show this doing gangbusters? Nancy Bloody Grace, who is about as firebrand as it gets.  She might be borderline nuts, but she gets the ratings.
_
     I don&#039;t think it is a matter of people looking at a show and seeing it fail to present a neutral viewpoint in some subtle way and changing the channel.  I think that people want to watch shows that reflect certain viewpoints and, if given the choice, would rather watch an on air fight, than someone dryly describing the facts about what happened earlier that day.
_
     It&#039;s sad but to be successful as a TV news show host the ratings suggest that reality requires you to be hyperpartisan, opinionated, egotistical etc. etc.  Making any attempt at dry news and neutrality will lead to cancellation.
_
P.S. Can someone tell me how the heck to create a blank line between paragraphs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to jump in and say that I think terryann&#8217;s analysis earlier in this thread is exactly how I see the situation.  The MORE partisan the host is perceived I believe the BETTER the show does.  I disagree that if CNN were even to theoretically reach the promised land of actual and perceived neutrality that it would be a success.  The audience appears to want to watch the partisans and to watch arguments/opinion/analysis.  If someone created a dry newswire type show that just reported fact without the partisan opinion I think it would fail.<br />
__<br />
     Since Fox is killing everyone in the ratings by such a large margin I look at their numbers separately.  From that you see that the more partisan and opinion driven shows (O&#8217;Reilly, Hannity and Beck) are the top with the less opinion driven partisan shows faring worse (Greta, Smith, Baier).  In the race between MSNBC and CNN the more partisan shows, Olbermann, Maddow are beating the less opinion driven shows.  And one of the worst ratings-wise?  Brown, a show, irrespective of how it actually is, is a show sold as a straight news show, with an attempt (completely successful or not) as a straight news show.  Of note, a HLN show this doing gangbusters? Nancy Bloody Grace, who is about as firebrand as it gets.  She might be borderline nuts, but she gets the ratings.<br />
_<br />
     I don&#8217;t think it is a matter of people looking at a show and seeing it fail to present a neutral viewpoint in some subtle way and changing the channel.  I think that people want to watch shows that reflect certain viewpoints and, if given the choice, would rather watch an on air fight, than someone dryly describing the facts about what happened earlier that day.<br />
_<br />
     It&#8217;s sad but to be successful as a TV news show host the ratings suggest that reality requires you to be hyperpartisan, opinionated, egotistical etc. etc.  Making any attempt at dry news and neutrality will lead to cancellation.<br />
_<br />
P.S. Can someone tell me how the heck to create a blank line between paragraphs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oakpack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038728</link>
		<dc:creator>oakpack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038728</guid>
		<description>Proof that America just doesn&#039;t want to be lied to. And how embarrasing for communist news nuts to be beat out by a radical college channel(messnews).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proof that America just doesn&#8217;t want to be lied to. And how embarrasing for communist news nuts to be beat out by a radical college channel(messnews).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Olbermann Is Number One? - The Right Scoop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038587</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Olbermann Is Number One? - The Right Scoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038587</guid>
		<description>[...] me tell you a little about this graph.  I chose to only graph the top two news agencies.  I am assuming that the unit for viewers is in thousands, however I didn&#8217;t see anything [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] me tell you a little about this graph.  I chose to only graph the top two news agencies.  I am assuming that the unit for viewers is in thousands, however I didn&#8217;t see anything [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cryptojunkie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038536</link>
		<dc:creator>cryptojunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038536</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In a way, that already happens in the industry.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 


How so? In no way do I see it currently.  I see everyone in journalism giving impartiality lip-service.


&lt;blockquote&gt;The problem with that is that would be removing freedoms from journalists.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  What I&#039;m talking about is living the life of extreme impartiality in order to become a true journalist.  Of course, most people would not want to give that up in order to pursue a career.  

&lt;blockquote&gt; In one way, it’d get in the way of doing their job.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  I disagree completely. If someone was to assume a position of total impartiality and without any personal political positions at all, it would go a long way to establishing themselves as a true journalist; someone who is a disconnected and impartial observer, investigator and reporter of the facts that does not have any personal political positions.  



&lt;blockquote&gt;
By the way, some of the folks from Murdoch’s kind make some good-sized Democrat political contributions.

sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Exactly my point of why there needs to be an independent standards body that enforces apolitical positions.  

&quot;How would it be enforced?&quot;, you may ask.   By the market.  If you have an organization that refuses to adhere to the standard, they don&#039;t get the certifying body&#039;s stamp of approval.

meh, all this typing is for naught.  No one in that industry in the truth anymore.  

John Stossel is the only one that comes to mind that is the closest to what I&#039;m talking about.  (And he is far from perfect of course.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In a way, that already happens in the industry.</p></blockquote>
<p>How so? In no way do I see it currently.  I see everyone in journalism giving impartiality lip-service.</p>
<blockquote><p>The problem with that is that would be removing freedoms from journalists.</p></blockquote>
<p>  What I&#8217;m talking about is living the life of extreme impartiality in order to become a true journalist.  Of course, most people would not want to give that up in order to pursue a career.  </p>
<blockquote><p> In one way, it’d get in the way of doing their job.</p></blockquote>
<p>  I disagree completely. If someone was to assume a position of total impartiality and without any personal political positions at all, it would go a long way to establishing themselves as a true journalist; someone who is a disconnected and impartial observer, investigator and reporter of the facts that does not have any personal political positions.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
By the way, some of the folks from Murdoch’s kind make some good-sized Democrat political contributions.</p>
<p>sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly my point of why there needs to be an independent standards body that enforces apolitical positions.  </p>
<p>&#8220;How would it be enforced?&#8221;, you may ask.   By the market.  If you have an organization that refuses to adhere to the standard, they don&#8217;t get the certifying body&#8217;s stamp of approval.</p>
<p>meh, all this typing is for naught.  No one in that industry in the truth anymore.  </p>
<p>John Stossel is the only one that comes to mind that is the closest to what I&#8217;m talking about.  (And he is far from perfect of course.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossberg500</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038452</link>
		<dc:creator>mossberg500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038452</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government. Has he been booked yet?

YYZ on March 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have no idea. I don&#039;t do the booking for either show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government. Has he been booked yet?</p>
<p>YYZ on March 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no idea. I don&#8217;t do the booking for either show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inmypajamas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038442</link>
		<dc:creator>inmypajamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038442</guid>
		<description>Way to move the goalposts, Sethstorm.  First, you claim Fox never hosts liberals, and then when it is pointed out to you that they do, you want to nitpick how they&#039;re interviewed.   The fact is that Fox does engage the Left and has left-leaning pundits on regularly so your original point has been debunked.

I think CNN and crew will most likely head left since that is where their hearts lie anyway.  Can&#039;t wait for my next agonizing airport layover in CNN indoctrination land.

And I would add John Roberts&#039; name to the list of insufferable lefties at CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to move the goalposts, Sethstorm.  First, you claim Fox never hosts liberals, and then when it is pointed out to you that they do, you want to nitpick how they&#8217;re interviewed.   The fact is that Fox does engage the Left and has left-leaning pundits on regularly so your original point has been debunked.</p>
<p>I think CNN and crew will most likely head left since that is where their hearts lie anyway.  Can&#8217;t wait for my next agonizing airport layover in CNN indoctrination land.</p>
<p>And I would add John Roberts&#8217; name to the list of insufferable lefties at CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038441</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

    mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM 

How many times did they get cut off?

sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Are they supposed to agree with them?
&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government. Has he been booked yet?

YYZ on March 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sounds like a good program. That guy can come on right after the global-warming kooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>    mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM </p>
<p>How many times did they get cut off?</p>
<p>sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Are they supposed to agree with them?</p>
<blockquote><p>There’s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government. Has he been booked yet?</p>
<p>YYZ on March 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds like a good program. That guy can come on right after the global-warming kooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YYZ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038426</link>
		<dc:creator>YYZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038426</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Glenn Beck interviewed the head of the communist party in the US(Sam Webb), and Sean Hannity interviewed Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party.

mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


There&#039;s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government.  Has he been booked yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Glenn Beck interviewed the head of the communist party in the US(Sam Webb), and Sean Hannity interviewed Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party.</p>
<p>mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s a guy on my street corner who keeps spouting off about one-world government.  Has he been booked yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark-Star</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038412</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark-Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038412</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    They won’t let anyone on who could actually shut their hosts up on Murdoch’s networks.

    sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well no duh! Doesn&#039;t that kind of go for &lt;em&gt;everybody&lt;/em&gt;? I mean really now, who wants to be pwned on air at their own game, never mind if they lean right or left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    They won’t let anyone on who could actually shut their hosts up on Murdoch’s networks.</p>
<p>    sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well no duh! Doesn&#8217;t that kind of go for <em>everybody</em>? I mean really now, who wants to be pwned on air at their own game, never mind if they lean right or left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossberg500</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038385</link>
		<dc:creator>mossberg500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038385</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How many times did they get cut off?

sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As many times as they refused to answer the questions directly, and went off on some other tangent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How many times did they get cut off?</p>
<p>sethstorm on March 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>As many times as they refused to answer the questions directly, and went off on some other tangent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038375</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How many times did they get cut off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
mossberg500 on March 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>How many times did they get cut off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038372</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038372</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
2. Require all employees to agree to a contract requiring them to become politically-agnostic, and swear an oath to remain so. The employee should suspend their voting rights while they are employed as a journalist and they can not participate in any way in any PAC, political function or be a member of any political party.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
In a way, that already happens in the industry.  The problem with that is that would be removing freedoms from journalists.  In one way, it&#039;d get in the way of doing their job.

By the way, some of the folks from Murdoch&#039;s kind make some good-sized Democrat political contributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
2. Require all employees to agree to a contract requiring them to become politically-agnostic, and swear an oath to remain so. The employee should suspend their voting rights while they are employed as a journalist and they can not participate in any way in any PAC, political function or be a member of any political party.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In a way, that already happens in the industry.  The problem with that is that would be removing freedoms from journalists.  In one way, it&#8217;d get in the way of doing their job.</p>
<p>By the way, some of the folks from Murdoch&#8217;s kind make some good-sized Democrat political contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossberg500</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038370</link>
		<dc:creator>mossberg500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038370</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Has Glen Beck ever hosted a lefty? How about a one-on-one interview with a liberal on Hannity?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Glenn Beck interviewed the head of the communist party in the US(Sam Webb), and Sean Hannity interviewed Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Has Glen Beck ever hosted a lefty? How about a one-on-one interview with a liberal on Hannity?</p></blockquote>
<p>Glenn Beck interviewed the head of the communist party in the US(Sam Webb), and Sean Hannity interviewed Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Infidel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/28/cnn-falls-to-third-place/comment-page-3/#comment-2038352</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=48242#comment-2038352</guid>
		<description>No bail out for CNN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No bail out for CNN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
