Oh there are lots of quotes that demean women in the bible.

Terry Silver on March 27, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Prithee one citation.

Akzed, thank you for the answer and information, but the “now go away” comment was not needed as I was merely stating what I thought would bolster your assertions and asking if I was correct in my quote, I wasn’t questioning your knowledge or saying you were wrong, quite the contrary.

Liberty or Death on March 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Sorry Liberty, but that was directed at Terry Atheist, not you. I told him I would answer five allegations of contrdictions in the Bible, then ignore him.

Actually I am more of a Punctuated Equilibrium kind of guy myself.

MB4 on March 27, 2009 at 7:03 PM

you’re admitting there is no fossil evidence for evolution…and there isn’t any. punctuated equilibirum, biological big bang…in other words, creation.

although punctuated equilibrium is part of evoluiton, it basically states evolution happened REAL fast…too fast for fossils…basically a miracle.

Has there always been a feud between MadisonConservative and right4life?

I’m still a little new here.

FontanaConservative on March 27, 2009 at 7:48 PM

yeah madisonwacko (he’s not conservative) is a pompous little fool who doesn’t take well to being made a fool out of. he’s faux conservative, and when called on it he gets real upset, and his fat little jowls quiver and his face turns red.

especially over the issue of gay marriage…he’s a typical fascist brown shirt that wants to impose it upon the rest of us, and silence any who dare disagree…

madisonfascist is more like it..

Heh! wrong4life…

ronsfi on March 27, 2009 at 7:10 PM

heh meh

Are you implying that Pope John Paul II was really an atheist?

MB4 on March 27, 2009 at 7:09 PM

catholocism believes in a theistic evolution…which isn’t what evolution is.

evolution is totally atheistic, as its followers…even MILLER, that patron saint of evolution admits…

Darwin knew that accepting his theory required believing in philosophical materialism, the conviction that matter is the stuff of all existence and that all mental and spiritual phenomena are its by-products. Darwinian evolution was not only purposeless but also heartless–a process in which the rigors of nature ruthlessly eliminate the unfit. Suddenly, humanity was reduced to just one more species in a world that cared nothing for us. The great human mind was no more than a mass of evolving neurons. Worst of all, there was no divine plan to guide us.” (Biology: Discovering Life, by Joseph S. Levine & Kenneth R. Miller (1st edition, D.C. Heath and Co., 1992), pg. 152; emphasis in original)

I hope every true Christian person here resents this little puke representing their number. I know better, but many don’t.

MadisonConservative on March 27, 2009 at 7:10 PM

better to be an imperfect representative of christianity, than a PERFECT example of evil, banality and stupidity.

bet you’re as hideous on the outside as you are on the inside.

thuja on March 27, 2009 at 8:15 PM

Pathetic.

Example. If one says “No Republicans are human,” one need only produce a single Republican who is also human in order to falsify the proposition.

This is so basic that I’m wondering why we have to bother with this.

philwynk on March 27, 2009 at 10:04 PM

Two different properties.

…

The sad thing with this whole issue is it’s going to be used to persecute non-muslims and those who leave Islam.

TTheoLogan on March 27, 2009 at 10:52 PM

You didn’t mention any muslim who wants to moderate Islam so that it is a religion with which the rest of us can live. Instead, the UN wants us to “live” with the status quo where the muslims punish or kill any moderate.

Thanks UN!

I don’t believe that story literally at all. From my religious upbringing at home and Catholic schools, it was more of a moral lesson in loyalty, even if it meant being all alone.

blatantblue on March 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Well, I don’t think catholics take much of any of the bible seriously, do they? “We don’t worship other gods, we venerate them.” A religion of wordplay.

Because, if A = B, then B = A. Therefore A and B are the same. Therefore two definitions are not applicable. To denote A and B is to denote a difference in property.

OldEnglish on March 27, 2009 at 8:59 PM

Um… perhaps my notation was unorthodox. What I meant was “some A is B,” or “all A is B.” In order to falsify the proposition “no A is B,” one need produce only 1 instance where A is B.

Example. If one says “No Republicans are human,” one need only produce a single Republican who is also human in order to falsify the proposition.

This is so basic that I’m wondering why we have to bother with this.

Al Queda and Islamo Fascism sucks!

Am I in violation of a UN Resolution?

Hehehehe … I anxiously await sanctions.

I have nothing to fear … Sadaam Hussien, Ackmadunajad, Kimmie I’m Ill point the way for dealing with the UN!