Red, red meat: Limbaugh interviews Mark Levin about his new book
posted at 5:55 pm on March 25, 2009 by Allahpundit
Meat so red the cow’s still screaming. I haven’t had time to listen, but what are the odds this’ll be anything less than Grade-A wagyu for Rush and Levin fans? If they had conferenced in Palin, they could have turned it into the red-meat equivalent of, well, this.
Believe it or not, the Democrats are still trying to Limbaugh-ize the GOP. Exit quotation: “We understand that Governor Jindal has had some problems with public speaking lately, but turning to Rush Limbaugh to be your new speechwriter doesn’t help.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Rush can be the BJ of the New Republican party.
Beck Boy can be the Thomas Paine.
Jindal’s got the Jefferson part.
Palin – can you say Georgie Washington?
klickink.wordpress.com on March 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM
Had they added in Palin, I would be in a serious meat coma right now.
myrenovations on March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM
Sprite would be proud. Well dogs (and most Democrats) don’t understand the concepts in Mark’s book, but Sprite would be proud anyway.
Mr. Joe on March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM
I like Levin more angry.
When he gets on a roll it cracks me up.
blue13326 on March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM
What if they start discussing weekend honey-do lists for 40 minutes?
lorien1973 on March 25, 2009 at 6:00 PM
This is red meat
Arlen Spector is trailing his Republican challenger in latest poll.
William Amos on March 25, 2009 at 6:02 PM
you know, i may come around to the accepted hot air policy positions on EVERYTHING…but i’ll just never enjoy the blowhard types.
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:05 PM
Mark Levin is incredibly smart.
Love his show.
Look forward to the book.
carbon_footprint on March 25, 2009 at 6:05 PM
ernesto, with all due love and respect, it’s time for you to MAN UP.
KelliD on March 25, 2009 at 6:06 PM
On either side?
Who on the left in the media do you consider comparable? I mean, what pundit on the left do you consider a blowhard?
hawkdriver on March 25, 2009 at 6:08 PM
You should make time to listen to it, Allah.
I heard it this afternoon, and it was a cogent and reasoned discussion of the book and conservatism in general.
Anyone who is laboring under the illusion that Levin and Limbaugh are “shock-jocks” would do well to hear this afternoons discussion.
A Balrog of Morgoth on March 25, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Look at the book that is #3 on Amazon behind Levin’s #1…something’s happening here
lukespapa on March 25, 2009 at 6:08 PM
That deeply saddens me, Ernie.
Fletch54 on March 25, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Heard it today, and it was really great.
Weight of Glory on March 25, 2009 at 6:12 PM
RESPECT THE BLOWHARDS!
Allahpundit on March 25, 2009 at 6:12 PM
Keith Olbermans a blowhard…though i dont think the left has anyone who dials the rage as high as levin. like i see this, and olberman…and then i find the buckley v. chomsky and i wonder why neither side can debate like that anymore…this ties into that british MEP, the level of our discourse, in all areas, is extremely low.
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:12 PM
Weeeee… Good for Levin to spend some time with El Rushbo to help push the new book. It was number 1 BEFORE this… wonder what kind of a bump it’ll get now?
bigskinny on March 25, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Note Rand’s Atlas Shrugged at #20 and Paine’s Common Sense at #25.
Viva the counter-revolution!
Disturb the Universe on March 25, 2009 at 6:16 PM
Mark Levin is calling out for people to some phone activism:
We need to get the Blue Dog Democrats to slow down budget approval in the House of Representatives. The vote in committee is tonight.
STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
PICK UP THE PHONE.
CALL 202-224-3121.
Ask for one of these five Congressmen:
1. Alan Boyd of Florida
2. Bob Etheridge of North Carolina
3. Charlie Melancon of Louisiana
4. Chet Edwards of Texas
5. John Yarmuth of Kentucky
Tell them to vote no on the budget tonight. We can stop the budget if you will pick up your phone right now. The vote is tonight.
carbon_footprint on March 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM
I don’t think anyone I’ve read or heard demands respect. I’d be happy if folks just quit mischaracterizing their content.
hawkdriver on March 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM
*poke poke poke*
Weight of Glory on March 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM
And the Oddballs
William Amos on March 25, 2009 at 6:18 PM
Speaking of blowhards, why don’t you actually listen to what you link before extolling the red meaty goodness?
Kensington on March 25, 2009 at 6:18 PM
mark is right rush is right obama is so far left he should have run for office in china.now theres talk that obama wants all the worlds money to be the same well count me out if the goverment does this america will be over.you libs who think this is a joke wise up i wish this was all a joke but its not wakeup people he’s selling us out .this will be treason.
wade underhile on March 25, 2009 at 6:18 PM
Allahpundit: Stop whining on Twitter please.
I promise you that the majority of us here love you. Sometimes we disagree, but we love you.
That is all.
carbon_footprint on March 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM
You can’t compare The Great One to a mental midget like Olberman. Sorry, but that is just ignorant.
Mark Levin is an intellectual who happens to be a great radio personality, while Olberman is a lightweight who happened to get a show on MSNBC (albeit with poor ratings).
Norwegian on March 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:12 PM
Why don’t you sign up Meaghan McCain and leave the rest of us alone. Watch Buckley and Gore Vidal at the ’68 convention for a real conflict of ideas. Very civilized liberal discussions..
We like Levin because he’s brilliant, concise and he knows where the bodies are buried.
TexasJew on March 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Got “Death of Right and Wrong” by Tammy Bruce, “Liberty and Tyranny” by The Great One, and “Atlas Shrugged.” Red meat to last me a decade at least.
Rush and Levin are a die hard combo. The great conservatives on radio. I hardly miss an episode when they’re on.
jencab on March 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Truth and the Light,
during the dark times
of an attempt to over
throw,America!!!!!!
canopfor on March 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM
William Amos on March 25, 2009 at 6:18 PM
lol
Disturb the Universe on March 25, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Funny how the left is all for “raging against the machine” until they run the machine.
Disturb the Universe on March 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM
Ahhh… The blowhards are the most entertaining. Just because someone is a blowhard doesn’t mean they arent telling the truth.
The value of their message isnt reduced because of the way they are presenting it. If you dismiss offhand what they say because of their tone, tough luck for you. It’s a LOT of fun.
bigskinny on March 25, 2009 at 6:24 PM
All i did was call olberman a blowhard…which he is. Rush is too. that doesnt mean im putting olberman on rush’s level…even ill admit thats not the case. just that they both get sensationalistic and overly simplistic when trying to make a point sometimes…and let emotions take them to places they need not go.
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:24 PM
And what if he is? Rumor has it Orson Welles wrote speeches for FDR.
Disturb the Universe on March 25, 2009 at 6:24 PM
YES! Finally someone trying to defend the correct use of the term “liberal”. I’m so tired of seeing that word destroyed by American socialists or social-democrats. I am a hardcore liberal – the Milton Friedman, Thomas Jefferson kind
Baphomet on March 25, 2009 at 6:26 PM
i love how somehow i still get construed as leftist even though ive come to agree with plenty of commenters here on multiple issues. either way, there is absolutely something to be said for the way ideas are discussed today on the airwaves (with raw emotion getting in peoples way sometimes…) and how well our leaders can discuss their own ideas.
listen to buckley style discourse and we may end up with a few legislators that mirror that excellent MEP that was featured earlier
listen to rush, bruce, levin, hannity style emotional exclamation and you wind up with boehner.
not that thats an absolute comparison either…its not…but i do wonder what the real effects are.
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM
Hey, you stole my line!
Darth Executor on March 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM
You want to know what Mark and Rush were talking about? This crap:
Ugh. Good thing we gave D.C. 700 billion, huh? I’m going to eat dinner.
Weight of Glory on March 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM
In 2006 Pelosi said Impeachment was off the table. Signaling to the country the Democrats were not run by the angry mob within its ranks.
In 2008 Obama ran as the candidate looking to get past the angry mobs of days gone by.
Both times the Democrats won DESPITE the wailing and teeth gnashing from the angry left.
Somehow the angry right is too blind to see that and instead thinks the 8 years of BDS helped the Dems.
barkolounger on March 25, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Translated: It does help.
When democrats tell you something is hurting you, keep doing it, because you can be sure it’s hurting them.
whitetop on March 25, 2009 at 6:33 PM
Wait a sec. Nevermind, that story was written in Aug. 08. See, that’s why I shouldn’t post on an empty tummy!
Weight of Glory on March 25, 2009 at 6:34 PM
Yeah, that Adams, Franklin, Lincoln, just a bunch of blowhards to you…
right2bright on March 25, 2009 at 6:34 PM
ernesto, I don’t always agree with what you say, but I have to admit you obviously no leftist. And I’ve already admitted that you’re a big more pragmatic (or at least less driven by emotions) in your posts than me. But, I’m not sure you realize how Conservatives feel like they have to throw down to defend their ideals and themselves after these last couple of years. It can lead to quick retorts sometimes.
hawkdriver on March 25, 2009 at 6:34 PM
They’re really driving up expectations.
Sign of the Dollar on March 25, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Finally, a blueprint for conservative politicians to follow…
right2bright on March 25, 2009 at 6:35 PM
America as we knew her IS over. The bailouts and corporate takeovers constitute a major shift in our philosophy of government. One which will continue to take root at least over the next four years. It is going to be a very long way back. This statist trend will continue until there is a major backlash, like a massive tax revolt.
neuquenguy on March 25, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Or worse I fear.
hawkdriver on March 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM
you surely jest
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:37 PM
Just heard a report that Billary said that the US is mostly to blame for drug violence in and from Mexico. If true, someone has an opportunity to stomp all over her.
MB4 on March 25, 2009 at 6:38 PM
Nothing is over until we say it is
TheBigOldDog on March 25, 2009 at 6:38 PM
An opportunity to bash Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin at the same time? Allah, you must be thinking you died and went to atheist Heaven huh?
In the words of the immortal John Candy: BASH THEM REAL GOOD!
HA! HA! HA!
RMR on March 25, 2009 at 6:42 PM
The Real George Washington, Beck’s second book rec, is #10. Viva the counter-revolution, indeed!
KellyBomelly on March 25, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Is the level of discourse low, or is the level of discourse which acquires widespread media attention low?
TheUnrepentantGeek on March 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM
Someone already said the Big O(lberman).
Here’s more:
Bill Mahr.
Chris Matth(sp)ews.
Jimmy Crack-Corn Carville.
Paul Balgalia.
Tom Brokaw.
Jon(so dumb he forgets to put the ‘h’ in his name) Stewart.
David Letterman.
TIna (was a nobody ’til I took down Pailn) Fey.
More than I have time to share.
klickink.wordpress.com on March 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM
“I can smile, and murder as I smile.” — Richard III
You probably think you’re more interested in substance than style, don’t you, Ernie?
I’m just getting started on Levin’s book, but the tone of it is more like the serious moments on his radio show than the nickname-spewing rageball stuff.
Jim Treacher on March 25, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Aaaaah, the … French.
YYZ on March 25, 2009 at 6:46 PM
carbon_footprint on March 25, 2009 at 6:17 PM
anyone that thinks Etherridge is a bluedog dem does not know him. His district is made up of half of chapel hill and surrounding area. he is one of the most liberal memebers of the house. he hides it well but look at his record and he votes with pelosi 99.9% of the time. this time will be no different
unseen on March 25, 2009 at 6:46 PM
Gotta go with Mahr. Mahr is the archetypical liberal blowhard.
ernesto on March 25, 2009 at 6:46 PM
Well why don’t you give it a shot.
I’m sure you have a cogent analysis ready for why America doesn’t bears the responsibility for its 30 year old bi partisan drug policy?
I’m sure you have a conservative defense for the massive expansion of prisons and prisoners under clinton and bush jr.
I’m sure militarization of the drug war was the only patriotic way of dealing with American drug dependency.
I know it is far more politically attractive to send special forces abroad to kill ‘narco terrorist’ than it is addressing the issues of addiction and crime related to it here at home.
What I find sad is watching good conservatives pretend they are all for personal responsibility until someone suggests they may be in part responsible.
Our drug policy is a national tragedy and we have helped create it as much as the Dems.
barkolounger on March 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM
I have heard a lot of people bash Rush, but I don’t think I have ever heard anybody take on one of Rush’s arguments and even attempt to prove it wrong. I am not saying he is always right, simply that his detractors never seem to feel up to the task of engaging him in debate.
neuquenguy on March 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Yeah, it’s very thoughtful stuff and very soberly presented. I bought the audio book yesterday and have listened to the first few chapters so far.
Kensington on March 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM
anyone that thinks Rush is a blowhard does not listen to his show.
unseen on March 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM
That is classic liberalism like that Jeff Goldstein writes so well about there is a huge difference in that and modern libertine liberals.
goat on March 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Hahahahhahahahahhahahha…sigh…hahahahahhahahahahahahaaaaa.
Wanna’ bet?!?!
klickink.wordpress.com on March 25, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Someone tell me exactly how you’d stage a tax revolt in the days of federal withholding and wage garnishment. Unfortunately they’ve got us by the short n’ curlies there.
Hmm, maybe I could convince my employer to pay me in gold and silver coins, or maybe even 9mm ammo. At this rate I think I might even take canned goods.
By the way, canned corn was three bucks per dozen at Costco yesterday. Stock up!
TheMightyMonarch on March 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM
I heard it on Rush’s show today and it was a fantastic conversation. I am going to pick up Levin’s book as soon as I can.
goat on March 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Tax withholding is probably the biggest government rip-off in the history of the country. If people had to write a check to the government for the taxes at the end of the year out country would be very different. Never mind that withholding also makes employers unpaid tax collectors for the government.
neuquenguy on March 25, 2009 at 6:53 PM
I worry that these books are mostly just preaching to the choir.
I think Levin has always thought many people on the left are to be defeated and not reasoned with because it is simply not possible. I think he is right but I see them growing in numbers and we are shrinking and hardening. I think it is unavoidable where this is all going to end up.
kangjie on March 25, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Not sure where I heard this, it might have even been a Congressman proposing legislation. But the gist of it was the idea that we should end all federal withholdings and send every taxpayer a bill for taxes due. On November 3rd.
Imagine millions of pissed off taxpayers, all of whom have just written a check for 40% of their yearly income, marching into the voting booth. Some people might just pass up the voting booth and head to Washington armed to the teeth. Not to mention the billions of dollars in delinquent taxes that the IRS would never be able to collect.
TheMightyMonarch on March 25, 2009 at 6:59 PM
You know what’s amazing to me.
Why is it that Talk Radio guys are the new Jefferson’s and Paine’s of the world. And I’m not putting Rush, Levin and the others down. I think they are great. Thank God for them.
But every flipping representative in Congress is wealthy beyond imagination simply by being in that cesspool of corruption. You would think that at least one would care enough and have enough talent to emerge and become a true spokesman for Libery an we non-robots out here.
But no…Levin and Rush have to do it.
notagool on March 25, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Well, Snowe said the stimulus is already working.
Alaska will take the money and Palin’s legal bills are adding up. Send money.
Cantor wants the President to focus on the economy but skipped the press conference to see a Britny Spears concert. Creepy.
Steele on his rish comments:
He was testing you cons.LOL.
getalife on March 25, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Legislators don’t read bills they sign.
Bloggers don’t listen to the clips they post.
More Fat Ass Missy McCain posts please!!
redrock on March 25, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Correct. It’s all good fun, some tongue in cheek, some over-the-top rants, but true and valuable.
peski on March 25, 2009 at 7:02 PM
That is the core of my discontent with the Republican party.
peski on March 25, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Yes, Sprite would be proud, and for anyone who has not read Mark Levin’s “Rescuing Sprite”, if you are an animal lover, it is such a wonderful testament to the love between humans and their furry friends.
Glynn on March 25, 2009 at 7:08 PM
I heard this today, no red meat, just interesting, factual stuff. Really smart men, both of them. Anyone who tries to deny this, is simply out of touch. Truth is untouchable. You can trash the messenger, but you can’t dispute the message. I don’t care if someone doesn’t like Rush’s “style”, but I want you to provide FACTS when you dispute his words.
anniekc on March 25, 2009 at 7:08 PM
That’s not even close to being true.
Our VP isn’t wealthy for one.
But on a much wider note, you must have missed the stories of small red state reps sleeping in their office because they can’t afford DC rent.
And besides, when did we start equating wealth with corruption.
I thought class warfare was a Dem thing.
barkolounger on March 25, 2009 at 7:11 PM
“A Republic, if you can keep it”
The problem is that to keep the republic requires strong principles, virtue and heroism. The left caters to the path of least resistance, to the lowest inclinations of man. In the absence of an heroic straggle for virtue and liberty, the tendency to laziness and egoism triumphs.
neuquenguy on March 25, 2009 at 7:11 PM
why would i care what some liberal like snowe thinks?
again… do you at least get paid for this crap you post?
it seems if one gives up their self-respect, much like a whore, one should be paid.
Jamson64 on March 25, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I wish I had the courage to read this, but with three older, rescued dogs, I’m just not ready to go there yet! I love that he honored his “Sprite” with a book though.
anniekc on March 25, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Quoting Ernesto
“just that they both get sensationalistic and overly simplistic when trying to make a point sometimes…and let emotions take them to places they need not go.”
I agree that they can be overly simplistic… it would actually be good if they got in depth on an issue like say Social Security and how it takes away individual responsibility, fosters unnecessary dependence between generations, between man and government and ultimately is a Ponzi scheme and a fraud ( the employer never matches your contribution – he just reduces your salary by that SS amount and passes the buck back to you).
I am not a Rush listener and i dont know if he has tried this before. How ever in his defense, he is a radio show host and entertainer as well. So, he does get a little sensational.
At the very least he isnt talking about “healing” the planet in peril and indulge in rhetorical flourishes that MEAN NOTHING. you know, like the current POTUS does.
nagee76 on March 25, 2009 at 7:12 PM
I just got back from Wally World, there was a car in the parking lot that had “WE SURROUND YOU” written on it’s back screen. Somebody’s listening.
Cindy Munford on March 25, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Wagyu, Allah?
Try Allen Brothers.
BKennedy on March 25, 2009 at 7:14 PM
What the hell world do you live in Barkalouger? Get your facts straight before you post- Biden has a huge net worth. He’s been collecting on his senatorial status for years.
anniekc on March 25, 2009 at 7:15 PM
“Our VP isn’t wealthy for one.”
Joe Biden owns a 6200 square foot mansion on 14 wooded, lakeside acres in Maryland, that he bought for about $400K in the mid-90′s. Sweet deal, heh?
He’s wealthy beyond anyone reading this forum….by far.
Every single one of the corrupt smear merchangs in Congress is wealthy, because they are criminals. All of them.
Who ever heard of a “struggling ex-congressman”. To say it is to laugh.
notagool on March 25, 2009 at 7:16 PM
And that is somehow in your mind a casus belli for murder and torture and kidnappings on the part of Mexican gangs?
Very few people in the U.S. are in prison who don’t belong there and for that matter there are plenty of people not in prison who should be, or still be, there.
I was not aware of any U.S. militarization of the “drug war”. Do you belong to some super secret force that has been fighting in Mexico?
Are you getting this news through some special frequency on your radio?
Plenty of money has been spent on addictions. If you are still addicted just go find Jesus or something.
Rather ironic on your part as it sounds like you don’t believe in personal responsibility at all.
MB4 on March 25, 2009 at 7:22 PM
I wish I could call the moderates irrelevant like Levin does but I just can’t. Not when they are nominated by the Republican party for President.
Dollayo on March 25, 2009 at 7:24 PM
If Sarah Palin memorizes “Liberty and Tyranny”, the Democrats are doomed. Think a hot Margaret Thatcher on a mission to destroy those who attacked her family.
Right_of_Attila on March 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Odd as when I lived in that area I had no trouble paying rent on an apartment with a fraction of their pay.
MB4 on March 25, 2009 at 7:27 PM
If the “moderates” and independents didn’t vote for McCain, who do we have to nominate to get them? maybe Kucinich?
neuquenguy on March 25, 2009 at 7:28 PM
If he is not wealthy after all those years in DC he must be an idiot. Just another reason he should not be VP.
Jamson64 on March 25, 2009 at 7:35 PM
On their salaries they should be able to swing the rent.
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/apa/
Jamson64 on March 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think republicans should nominate any more moderates. I’m just pointing out that a moderate did win the nomination and that tells me that they are not irrelevant, unfortunately.
Dollayo on March 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM
He must have been a really great bargainer. Maybe after he retires from office I can hire him as a buyers real estate agent.
MB4 on March 25, 2009 at 7:39 PM
Quite the shame since the interview was adult, serious, and relevant. Three things in far too short supply among the liberal “Republicans” you usually gush over. Far easier for you to throw insults at Jindal than address any of the issues brought up in this interview.
highhopes on March 25, 2009 at 7:43 PM
How soon you forget the way the primaries were rigged to help the liberal wing of the GOP. McCain would have been toast had he not won “winner take all” contests in places like Florida where the real Republicans had to fight one another- allowing the rat bastard poltical traitor clear sailing.
highhopes on March 25, 2009 at 7:45 PM
Is there a place for them in the reborn GOP? I tend to think there isn’t. This is about the survival of the nation and the ideology that provided all those freedoms and prosperity. I’ll be damned if Arlen Specter and John McCain are worth defending as part of the nation’s defense.
highhopes on March 25, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Don’t worry about it, most don’t think your a leftest. There are talk show hosts that will have me diving for the dial also but that doesn’t make them bad, just not my thing.
Cindy Munford on March 25, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Rush bought his own telephone.
And he never begged anyone to pay his tuition — even himself.
Stephen M on March 25, 2009 at 7:49 PM
notagool on March 25, 2009 at 7:16 PM
What the hell are you talking about?
http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/overview.php?type=W&year=2006&filter=S&sort=A
Besides, what are you doing assuming the income level of contributors here?
—————–
casus belli? Taking responsibility for an outcome doesn’t justify or excuse actions taken getting to that outcome.
If person A breaks law B they ‘deserve’ to be in jail.
That’s not what I’m arguing.
When millions of people end up in jail for breaking the same laws then only a zealous ideologue would argue locking people up is an effective way to counter the law breaking.
It’s not so secret. And have you looked into DEA procurement lately?
We’ve had special forces in Columbia for years.
Who is talking about throwing money at failed policy? You seem to be suggesting the Drug war isn’t a failed policy so keeping the billions flowing to that fight is a good use of the money.
I disagree.
What part?
Oh, and btw the whole premise of the back and forth is crap anyway. Clinton didn’t say “the US is mostly to blame for drug violence”.
Just more over selling the outrage.
She said
“I feel very strongly we have a co-responsibility,” Clinton told reporters, adding: “Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade. Our inability to prevent weapons from being illegally smuggled across the border to arm these criminals causes the deaths of police officers, soldiers and civilians.”
barkolounger on March 25, 2009 at 7:59 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »