Going Galt at AIG

posted at 10:57 am on March 25, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Now that Congress, Barack Obama, and the media feel thoroughly satisfied in their two-week screechfest over AIG’s retention bonuses, the bill may come due for American taxpayers who invested in the company’s bailout to the tune of over 1,000 times the amount of the bonuses.  The New York Times reprints a resignation letter from one of the targets of Official Ire over the bonuses, a man who worked for the huge salary of $1 apart from the bonus he was promised for helping rescue the company from bankruptcy.  He blames Edward Liddy for not defending his employees, and refuses to work any longer for no compensation:

It is with deep regret that I submit my notice of resignation from A.I.G. Financial Products. I hope you take the time to read this entire letter. Before describing the details of my decision, I want to offer some context:

I am proud of everything I have done for the commodity and equity divisions of A.I.G.-F.P. I was in no way involved in — or responsible for — the credit default swap transactions that have hamstrung A.I.G. Nor were more than a handful of the 400 current employees of A.I.G.-F.P. Most of those responsible have left the company and have conspicuously escaped the public outrage.

After 12 months of hard work dismantling the company — during which A.I.G. reassured us many times we would be rewarded in March 2009 — we in the financial products unit have been betrayed by A.I.G. and are being unfairly persecuted by elected officials. In response to this, I will now leave the company and donate my entire post-tax retention payment to those suffering from the global economic downturn. My intent is to keep none of the money myself.

I take this action after 11 years of dedicated, honorable service to A.I.G. I can no longer effectively perform my duties in this dysfunctional environment, nor am I being paid to do so. Like you, I was asked to work for an annual salary of $1, and I agreed out of a sense of duty to the company and to the public officials who have come to its aid. Having now been let down by both, I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down.

Last week, I wrote that I expected Liddy to say this to Congress in response to their entirely hypocritical, false, and calculated outrage.  Liddy apparently didn’t have the courage of Jake DeSantis, who refuses to stick around and be abused by people who have no clue as to what he does and how he got compensated for it.  DeSantis does, and the Times should get some kudos for giving him a voice.

The US has invested over $150 billion in AIG, expecting to get at least some of that value returned.  If not, we could simply have made direct payments on behalf of AIG to its creditors and allowed the company to go bankrupt.  In order to get value back out of the company, we need to have people on board who understand the complicated financial provisions of AIG’s problems and can apply the investment towards resolving them.  In other words, we needed Jake DeSantis on that wall, and we just did everything we could to knock him off of it, along with the rest of his colleagues.

People have been calling the AIG bonus outrage “understandable.”  That’s a load of crap.  It springs from a fundamental lack of understanding in Congress about the business world and an almost criminal lack of curiosity about the nature of retention bonuses in general, and these retention bonuses and their recipients in particular.  The screeching and hollering was only “understandable” as complete and total ignorance and stupidity.  And that’s not even accounting for the fact that Treasury, Congress, and the Obama administration knew all about these bonuses long before being “outraged” by them.

Now DeSantis is leaving, and the rest of the people that we’ve pilloried without having a clue who they were, what they did, and what they’re doing now will probably follow as soon as they can find jobs.  Why rescue a bunch of ingrates, after all?  Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

“Take this job and shove it!”

Johnny Paycheck

Wethal on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

if we had our act together, we’d be going pitchfork against ACORN and the other idiots doing this crap.

jp on March 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Frank, et al, will soon accuse the departing AIG employees of not being “patriotic.”

Wethal on March 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

While Congress and the administration are worried about the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Starlink on March 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Well, you gotta position them such that the teleprompter is visible and stuff.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:02 AM

It springs from a fundamental lack of understanding in Congress about the business world and an almost criminal lack of curiosity about the nature of retention bonuses in general, and these retention bonuses and their recipients in particular.

This is pure BS. Congress totally understands the nature of retention bonuses, but they chose it ignore that fact so that they could fan the flames.

ladyingray on March 25, 2009 at 11:02 AM

BRAVO!!!!!! I hope more follow his example.

I wish I could remember the journalists and threaders that were saying, “Where will the go? They have to stay.” No they don’t.

I really appreciate the last line of his letter:

I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down.

Family first!!!

WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Then take away 90 cents in tax.

Patrick S on March 25, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.
Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Nope. At $1 per year they are still overpaid.

rbj on March 25, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Even though I am now a part owner of his company, I am very proud of DeSantis for writing what he wrote and then making an exit.

But I would prefer it if he kept the money…

myrenovations on March 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM

AIG bankruptcy watch is moving along nicely now thanks to congresses grandstanding and public ‘shaming’

gatorboy on March 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM

if we had our act together, we’d be going pitchfork against ACORN and the other idiots doing this crap.

jp on March 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

That’s the problem. We HAVE our act together. We’re too busy working for a living to take a bus ride to someone’s house to be someone else’s Rent-a-Mob.

CurtZHP on March 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM

While Congress and the administration are worried about the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Starlink on March 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Pessimist! Just think what those would fetch on EBay.

Shy Guy on March 25, 2009 at 11:06 AM

The Committee of Public Safety is not going to let the facts get in the way of punishing the guilty scapegoats.

…to ensure supplies, the committee instituted a partial system of maximum prices and fixed wages; and to repress domestic opposition, it instituted the Reign of Terror.

forest on March 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

No kidding. I’d like to see one Congressman say hey, you know what? It was our massive spending on useless projects that brought us into this deficit, so the righteous thing for us to do would be to forego a salary or any other type of compensation until a)the deficit is fixed, and b) we regain the public’s trust.

scalleywag on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

You don’t think this is the plan? Expect their henchmen to be running things very, very soon.

Realist on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

No, that’s overkill. 25 cents. Tops.

Fletch54 on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

That’s the problem. We HAVE our act together. We’re too busy working for a living to take a bus ride to someone’s house to be someone else’s Rent-a-Mob.

CurtZHP on March 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM

true enough, but if some pitch forks showed up on the steps of ACORN leaders houses I imagine many of them would run away like the pansies they are.

jp on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

Why not put ACORN in charge? After all, they are the ObamaBots on steroids, their actions have pushed the capable leaders of AIG into full retreat in an effort to keep their families safe, and besides, ACORN certainly gets enough tax payer funds. Let them earn those!

DannoJyd on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

By the end of the week the demorats will pass a law requiring AIG employees to stay on the job for zero salary or face prison time.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM

You don’t think this is the plan? Expect their henchmen to be running things very, very soon.

Realist on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

…and then the bonus will be A-OK!!

WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM

That’s the problem. We HAVE our act together. We’re too busy working for a living to take a bus ride to someone’s house to be someone else’s Rent-a-Mob.

CurtZHP on March 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Under Obamanomics that could change overnight.

DannoJyd on March 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM

By the end of the week the demorats will pass a law requiring AIG employees to stay on the job for zero salary or face prison time.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Sadly, over 50 House republicans will vote for it.

myrenovations on March 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM

I felt sorry for Liddy last week after having to endure Fwank’s spluttering menstrual fit. Apparently he’s as gutless at Fwank and Obambi.

AubieJon on March 25, 2009 at 11:11 AM

In a sane world Jake DeSantis’s letter would shame Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dood, Andrew Cuomo, Richard Blumenthal and all the pundits who lead the AIG lynch mob… The sad reality is none them will even understand its significance.

jasetaro on March 25, 2009 at 11:12 AM

…and then the bonus will be A-OK!!
WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:09 AM

I think they need to turn the management of AIG over to a more responsible entity like ACORN. I bet that would work out just great!

Outlander on March 25, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Kudos to DeSantis for walking away from an abusive relationship…the current Congress needs a major shakedown.

RepubChica on March 25, 2009 at 11:13 AM

This goes to what I’ve been asking:
Who, exactly, is receiving the AIG bonuses?
Is it the people responsible for the mess?
Is it the people who came aboard to clean it up?
Is it the IT guys who keep the computers and networks running?
Who is it – exactly?

Well, no one is saying exactly who it is.
They’re just reporting it as “…..those greedy fat-cat bastards at AIG!….”

And Obama-lama-ding-dong is still blaming Bush!

We’re bailing out foreign banks, and this asshat – and the rest of the asshats – are spitting fire over these bonuses.
We’ll be bankrupt by summer, if not sooner.
What’s it been? Seven – eight weeks?
And look at what this goddamned idiot has done to the economy…….

guitarguy on March 25, 2009 at 11:15 AM


The man has Honor and ought to run for office soon.We need elected officials that understand what goes on. Self made men made this country and will reclaim it!


Commies only last so long and in this fast paced information age BS gets called real fast.

Col.John Wm. Reed on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Jake DeSantis,

Edd,

Seriously,

The man LOST the company billions exposed them and the industry into Trillions.

He will probably be investigated AKA Enron and possibly will serve some serious jail time possibly.

Oh sure he sent back the blackmail money – if you don’t give me 4 millions dollars – I wont tell you where I buried your money….

Look, this is all very complex but if a fund manager makes horrendously bad decisions, causes world wide panic, then agrees only to stay on if he “declares” it fixed for millions of dollars

Lets place the outrage where it is.

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Aw, the millions of Americans that lost their jobs say quit whining.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:17 AM

I think they need to turn the management of AIG over to a more responsible entity like ACORN. I bet that would work out just great!

Outlander on March 25, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Future scenario with ACORN in charge:

Management (ACORN): Please process this insurance claim for Mr. Jimmy Johns.
Grunt Employee (Non ACORN): Sir, we have no customer by the name of Jimmy Johns.
Management (ACORN): Trust me. The Customer is legitiamate. I registered him five time before the 2008 elections.
Grunt Employee (Non ACORN): Isn’t this where we had lunch yesterday.
Management (ACORN): Do I need the press the “reset” button on your job here?

WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM

I admire this guy for a)publishing his letter and b)telling AIG what they can do with his $1 job. I hope many of his co-workers follow suit.

Hello Mr. Government…get the message? Not only have you botched saving AIG and wasted billions of dollars in your attempt to do so, you’ve put peoples lives in danger by encouraging outrage about bonuses that YOU YOURSELF promised they could earn, prompting every day citiizens to hop on a witch hunt bus for perhaps the first time in history. And now you’re seeing competent employees who COULD HAVE HELPED fix the problem start walking out the door. Way to go! Gong show indeed. What a bunch of morons. Sorry, didn’t mean to insult the morons.

scalleywag on March 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM

If anyone knows of a political party that’s willing to limit the federal government to national defense, domestic security, rational economic regulation, and the most basic roles of government–judicial system, law enforcement, and penal system–AND NO SOCIAL ENGINEERING, please identify it.

I know it’s not the Dems, and I strongly suspect it’s not the GOP because their conduct in the past two weeks was pretty laughable.

We need some adults running this country. We should have had that with a GOP White House and a GOP Congress for six of the past eight years. Now, thanks to those pieces of sh*t, we get 100 times worse.

Even if too many nitwits voted non-Bush, there’s no way you’ll ever convince me that they voted for what’s coming our way compliments of Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.

Every time you think the GOP is going to grow up, you have cowards such as Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan turn around and vote in favor of this ridiculous 90% tax in the House. Thankfully, I think Kyl and some other grown ups in the Senate are going to sit on things until this faux rage blows over, but Cantor and Ryan really blew in my eyes. Ryan, in particular. I thought he was a serious guy–not any more. Pinheads.

What the hell? We’re getting what representation that we voted for. Hell, even my dumba** rep, Jean Schmidt of Ohio voted for that nonsense tax. What a bunch of clowns.

BuckeyeSam on March 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Its not like he joined the firm last week as he was a principle player in organizing and streamlining high risk ventures to make up for the drop in interest rates (where insurance companies typically make their returns)

He also was a key player in Keeping AUDITORS and AIG’s RISK CONTROL MANAGERS – out of his department

Geez

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Let Obama, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd rescue AIG instead.

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.
Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

and take away their taxing authority.

UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on March 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM

In a sane world Jake DeSantis’s letter would shame Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dood

In a sane world we would already have dragged these people from their office kicking and screaming and pleading for mercy, stripped them to their undies, thrown them into the stocks, whipped them, and then ridden them out of town on a rail, covered in tar and feathers to be unceremoniously tossed into the local garbage dump.

Sadly we don’t live in a sane world and the thieves are allowed to retain their offices and their influence, robbing us blind while the lazy assholes of our society continue to vote for them so as to get a free ride from the rest of us.

I need a coffee.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM

Aw, the millions of Americans that lost their jobs say quit whining.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:17 AM

The rest of us wish you’d stop talking…

Anyway this going Galt idea is difficult for me; I would like to, and think that we should, but at the same time we should feel more responsible to the people that we’re dooming. Not only that, but we’re screwed if we all quit and the media successfully blames the depression on the people who left.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM

$

vsunited on March 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Lets place the outrage where it is.

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Your comment suggests that you didn’t read the guy’s letter.

BuckeyeSam on March 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Provide references please.

Nonetheless, he seems to have spent the past year working for nothing … didn’t the US outlaw slavery ?

gh on March 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

When will these people stop holding their hands out for welfare?

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

This goes to what I’ve been asking:
Who, exactly, is receiving the AIG bonuses?
Is it the people responsible for the mess?
Is it the people who came aboard to clean it up?
Is it the IT guys who keep the computers and networks running?
Who is it – exactly?

Well, no one is saying exactly who it is.
They’re just reporting it as “…..those greedy fat-cat b@stards at AIG!….”

And Obama is still blaming Bush!

We’re bailing out foreign banks, and everyone is spitting fire over these bonuses.
We’ll be bankrupt by summer, if not sooner.
What’s it been? Seven – eight weeks?
And look at what this idiot has done to the economy…….

guitarguy on March 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM

While we’re at it, let them work for $1 a year, too.

Snowed In on March 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM

I love that idea, but how about we add to it. Taking a cue from the business world all public servants in congress and in the White House, should agree to be compensated $1 per year for their services, and at the end of the year, if the budget remains balanced they’ll get a bonus, in the amount of their normal annual salary – which will then be taxed as a bonus. LOL

smfoushee on March 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM

It’s a lot of misdirected hostility. People should be outraged that their tax dollars are paying someone else’s bonus, but they should be outraged at Congress for approving something that ridiculous to begin with. Pointing the blame at regular folks, instead of at the Senators is the problem. But until now, (Thank you NY Times and thank you Jake DeSantis) the regular folks haven’t had a chance to defend themselves. To borrow a well worn line: faster, PLEASE!

Ennuipundit on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

When will these people stop holding their hands out for welfare?
getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Strange coincidence, I was going to ask the same question of you.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

The party and media of failure.

Speakup on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Why would someone culpable put himself forward in such a manner? It’s likely to bring more scrutiny, not less.

Cindy Munford on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Oh gosh, the troll bus has just pulled in. And speaking of jobs, how many new jobs has the stimulus plan created thus far? How many shovel ready projects have hit dirt? Any?

scalleywag on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Lets place the outrage where it is.

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Okay, let’s. The outrage should be at the people who constructed the regulations that forced them to take all sorts of horrible mortgages, which forced them into the credit default swap market in the first place.

Or it could be at the people who constructed the bailouts, Bush/Obama/Democrats/Republicans, because without the bailouts, this never would have been an issue. AIG would have gone under, the financial system would have been shocked, but the economy is getting shocked every damn day at this point.

It’s not very complex, it’s pretty damn simple, the market should dictate how a company operates. We got into this problem from government regulation and we’re trying to dig ourselves out with more government regulation. All we’re doing is drinking shots to postpone our inevitable hangover.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

I thought cons were against welfare.

Another principle gone huh?

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

It’s too bad that no one will buy national television time for this guy to read this letter. Though the networks *should* do it for free, in the interest of being “fair and balanced” after giving Nobama all the free airtime he wants to continue his perpetual campaigning.

This guy, reading this letter, beside The One reading the prompter, would make it apparent just how vacuous The One really is.

He must be silenced.

Order the character assassination to continue. How dare he.

Changucopia on March 25, 2009 at 11:25 AM

The man LOST the company billions exposed them and the industry into Trillions.

Its not like he joined the firm last week as he was a principle player in organizing and streamlining high risk ventures to make up for the drop in interest rates (where insurance companies typically make their returns)

Read. The. Letter.

I am proud of everything I have done for the commodity and equity divisions of A.I.G.-F.P. I was in no way involved in — or responsible for — the credit default swap transactions that have hamstrung A.I.G. Nor were more than a handful of the 400 current employees of A.I.G.-F.P. Most of those responsible have left the company and have conspicuously escaped the public outrage.

Pablo on March 25, 2009 at 11:25 AM

It springs from a fundamental lack of understanding in Congress about the business world and an almost criminal lack of curiosity about the nature of retention bonuses in general, and these retention bonuses and their recipients in particular.

Golly Ed — what are you referring to with this statement? I think they seem to be really on the ball… as indicated by the following, supplied by your colleague AP:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcKfWNkyZtA

LOL!

D2Boston on March 25, 2009 at 11:25 AM

When will these people stop holding their hands out for welfare?

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

You know, maybe that thread yesterday about forums and blogs having to cough up their members’ names and addresses might not be so bad. Then we could find you and give you the cranial enema you so desperately need.

AubieJon on March 25, 2009 at 11:25 AM

guitarguy on March 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM

That’s the shame in this: Congress started pointing fingers before it had all the facts, and Liddy did little to correct matters.

BuckeyeSam on March 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM

We need politicians to understand that their role is a position of honor – NOT a lucrative career in and of itself. This fundamental change must happen in order to correct our governmental problems.
1) Term Limits. No more career politicians. You can have 2 terms as a senator or congressman, and then you’re either the President or you need to go back to the private sector – which you really shouldn’t have left in the first place as these positions are really not “full time” anyway.
2) The retirement plan for Politicians is an incredible fleecing of American taxpayers. Politicians should be on the same retirement plan as everyone else. Social Security. Otherwise, why should they really care how it’s managed to begin with?
3) Health insurance / benefits should be the same as everyone else and should only be in effect during the time in Office. After that, they should have to have their benefits from their private sector employment, just like everyone else. And at retirement, they need to be on the same Medicare/Medicaid the rest of us have to go on. Again, if not, why would they care how it’s managed or structured.

Simple in theory, but of course we have the little problem of WHO it is that needs to propose, approve and enact these changes to begin with.

KMC1 on March 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM

When will these people stop holding their hands out for welfare?

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:21 AM

I think this individual did a job for some time under a contract that said he would be paid, and now the State is retroactively trying to take all of his income for this time. If you have no sympathy for the guy because you don’t like his line of work, so be it, but doesn’t the State retroactively revoking contracts and pay for individual workers concern you at all? It does me, but whatever, I think your posts are disingenuous flaming most of the time anyway.

forest on March 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

I thought cons were against welfare.

Another principle gone huh?

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

What the hell are you talking about? Are you brain damaged? No conservative is cheerleading the bailouts. They might be arguing that you can’t break contract law, but none of them like corporate welfare. Get it through your head, the Republicans who vote for this crap are not conservative.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM

getalife: obama & the dems (& some RINOs) voted to add billiions to the WIC &food stamp programs & ACORN & the GIVE act. that’s welfare. so if you’re coming around to our way of thinking, then i say “welcome aboard”

kelley in virginia on March 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Ennuipundit on March 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Agreed we should have been howling at the point of TARP, but that ship has sailed.

Cindy Munford on March 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM

And the official response from congress and the White House will probably be “Sorry Comrade but we wont let you resign as you are now an indentured servant of the state”.

Dreadnought223 on March 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Good for DeSantis. I wish him well.

I can only hope that more will follow his lead. Let the looters loot until all of the people of the mind and producers tell them to go to hell. I have come to the point where I believe that it is the only way we will ever see true freedom again in this country (although it may not be this country anymore).

Curse those nitwit corruptocrats in D.C.!

King of the Britons on March 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM

How a person of even a little less than average intelligence can’t understand the difference between a performance bonus (money earned if the company does well) and a retention bonus (money earned by agreeing to stay on instead of bailing to aid and strengthen a company that’s floundering) is beyond me.

This was all staged and orchestrated in order to elicit anger and chaos from the masses, which is most certainly an intrinsic part of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. No wonder Saul’s best protege has a hard time stopping giggling.

marybel on March 25, 2009 at 11:28 AM

The rot that infects all flavors of socialism… Starts here.

Before long, you need bayonets to force people to pick vegetables.

tarpon on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:17 AM

It’s 11:00 am and while America is working, getalife finally wakes up for another day of putting off growing up so that he hit the Wii and chime in with brilliant witticisms like this between levels.

bluelightbrigade on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Sure you are. You are having tea parties in support of corporate welfare.

Adults are in charge.

You crazy kids go back to talking about teleprompters.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Another principle gone huh?
getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

“Principles”? From a follower of THIS administration? Comedy gold.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Thank you Massachusetts for nothing. You should be ashamed to have elected Barney Frank and John Kerry. Connecticut, you should be ashamed to have elected Chris Dodd and your Attorney General. Same for New York in electing Chuck Schumer and Cuoma as the Attorney General. This is targeting private citizens. Thank you Obama for your wonderful handpicked Army called ACORN for terrorizing private citizens. I almost cried when I read that letter to see what this Country is becoming because of the Democrats in Washington. Meanwhile, they sit there like they are not to blame for anything that is going on. They vote themselves pay raises, take trips on taxpayer money and don’t pay social security tax on their wages.

I love the idea of the Tea Parties, but we need to take this further and have a million person march on Washington and the White House and Congress.

I just spoke with someone that came here from a communist country to be free. They told me that the United States is becoming what they left behind in their old country.

We need to clean house and start with Dodd, Barney Frank, Pelosi, Boxer, Schumer, Waxman, Leahy and a bunch others. Specter, and the two clowns from Maine have to go too.

Enough is enough. We’re damn mad and we’re not going to take it anymore!!!

suzyk on March 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM

ANOTHER ONE BITS THE DUST.

Looks like Timmy lost another playmate up in Treasury..

Frank Brosens, a hedge fund manager who was Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s choice to run the office overseeing the $700 billion bank bailout program, withdrew his name from consideration.

This hiring thingy is hard man./

milwife88 on March 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM

I don’t believe this story. Do we know for certain this isn’t some hoax? Were these performance or retention bonuses? Does anyone know a corporate attorney who can explain the difference between a retention bonus and a performance bonus? I would assume that a retention bonus has to be returned if you don’t stay, while a performance bonus is yours to keep regardless. Similar to other benefits that have to be returned such as education perks where a company pays for your education. But if you leave the company in the next year (or two) you must return that money. How is it he is leaving but keeping his “retention” bonus? Paying those who helped sink the ship a performance bonus is the cause of the “outrage”. If he only agreed a few months ago (as did Liddy) to stay on for a buck, how is he getting a retention bonus now? Also, what would LIddy have accomplished by telling Congress to stuff it? I think he showed a great deal of restraint. Sometimes you have to take it if your goal is to get the job done.

mph on March 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Too little, too late.

The damage was done on live television in the filthy halls of Congress.

Anything after that is just mopping up. We’ve let the animals take our culture from us. The mauling has begun.

jeff_from_mpls on March 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM

Get it through your head, the Republicans who vote for this crap are not conservative.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM

I think his arse is in the way.

WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:31 AM

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM

You are in the enviable position of not having to try to comprehend what you’ve written.

lorien1973 on March 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM

getalife: i’m going to a teaparty to protest excessive spending which will lead to excessive taxing. my family has lost 1/3 – 1/2 in the stock market collapse & i don’t want to pay more taxes on top of that. what does that have to do with corp. welfare?

kelley in virginia on March 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Sure you are. You are having tea parties in support of corporate welfare.

Adults are in charge.

You crazy kids go back to talking about teleprompters.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Ohhhhh yeah, of course it all makes sense now, the tea parties protesting the bailouts and being trillions of dollars in debt are all just witty satire inspired by a brilliance like yours…/sarc

What the hell are you talking about?

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM

No kidding. I’d like to see one Congressman say hey, you know what? It was our massive spending on useless projects that brought us into this deficit, so the righteous thing for us to do would be to forego a salary or any other type of compensation until a)the deficit is fixed, and b) we regain the public’s trust.

scalleywag on March 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM

+100

tempestleo on March 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

You know, I used to hear about forums and blogs paying people to post stupidity to generate responses so the owners could improve their stats for generating advertising $$$. I’m starting to wonder if that isn’t what goes on with this moron. Nobody can really be this stupid and still be alive. Your mother would have drowned you before now.

AubieJon on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

STOP TALKING TO THE TROLL!!!! getalife IS A TROLL AND SHOULD BE IGNORED. HE ONLY TRIES TO GET A RISE OUT OF YOU AND LAUGHS WHEN HE DOES. DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!!!!!!

King of the Britons on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Libby should have torn that committee a new ass, but instead knelt and kissed their hypocritical asses.

GarandFan on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Buckeye Sam

No, I did read his letter – I also saw his Linkdin page

Jake DeSantis’s Experience
Executive Vice President
AIG Financial Products
(Public Company; 51-200 employees; Capital Markets industry)

May 1998 — Present (10 years 11 months)

Commodities.

Director
Union Bank of Switzerland
(Public Company; 10,001 or more employees; UBS; Investment Banking industry)

1992 — 1998 (6 years)

Equity derivatives trading.

I also saw articles about the very division he worked in kept the Risk Management Team at AIG out of their trades until it was too late

Guy NEVER EVER worked for a dollar – he was paid MILLIONS and was promised even more to stay and tell us where he buried OUR TAX MONEY.

Yes Barney Frank, Dodd et al are scum – but this guy needs a federal justice department review

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

getalife: i’m going to a teaparty to protest excessive spending which will lead to excessive taxing. my family has lost 1/3 – 1/2 in the stock market collapse & i don’t want to pay more taxes on top of that. what does that have to do with corp. welfare?

kelley in virginia on March 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM

Everything! I get it now, we should all see the light that everything we say is really some weird double speak mindf*** so that tea parties are in support of corporate welfare.

He must be high.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Adults are in charge.

You crazy kids go back to talking about teleprompters.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Thats a bit rich comming from the most immature person on this site.

Dreadnought223 on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

I need a coffee.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM

And I need a drink.

Knucklehead on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Let me add HE RAN THIS DIVISION – he was not the receptionist….

Decision maker

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Merely quiting or getting fired is NOT going Galt. Words and phrases have meaning. If this guy doesn’t pursue another job (and goes to a secret bunker in the desert), THEN he’s gone Galt.

Trent1289 on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

sorry for feeding the troll.

kelley in virginia on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

STOP TALKING TO THE TROLL!!!! getalife IS A TROLL AND SHOULD BE IGNORED. HE ONLY TRIES TO GET A RISE OUT OF YOU AND LAUGHS WHEN HE DOES. DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!!!!!!

King of the Britons on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Ever think we might enjoy feeding trolls? He’s good fodder to demonstrate why liberalism is a disease…

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Term limits is the solution to most of our problems…

d1carter on March 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM

STOP TALKING TO THE TROLL!!!! getalife IS A TROLL AND SHOULD BE IGNORED. HE ONLY TRIES TO GET A RISE OUT OF YOU AND LAUGHS WHEN HE DOES. DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!!!!!!

King of the Britons on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

Sad how people who actually & occasionally made a point and contributed something, like StOlaf, got thrown under the bus here faster than Sarah Palin!

But this fellow we’re supposed to suffer in the name of diversity.

I protest.

jeff_from_mpls on March 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Anyway this going Galt idea is difficult for me; I would like to, and think that we should, but at the same time we should feel more responsible to the people that we’re dooming.

It’s nearing gut check time, when the productive will need to determine who they are will to be save and who they are not. Plain and simple, the numbers of productive are dwindling, while the number of getaclue freeloaders are expanding; the producers will eventually have to choose.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:35 AM

If I worked at AIG, I wouldn’t give back CRAP. NOTHING, NADA, ZERO. I would tell them to go screw themeselves along with the AG of NY. TAKE IT FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS.

The guy works for a dollar, what idiot obamabot would do that? 0

Mercy4Me on March 25, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Yes, do not engage me.

Stick to talking about teleprompters.

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:36 AM

I need a coffee.

Bishop on March 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM
And I need a drink.

Knucklehead on March 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Coffee with some Irish whiskey.

WashJeff on March 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM

I also saw articles about the very division he worked in kept the Risk Management Team at AIG out of their trades until it was too late

Guy NEVER EVER worked for a dollar – he was paid MILLIONS and was promised even more to stay and tell us where he buried OUR TAX MONEY.

Yes Barney Frank, Dodd et al are scum – but this guy needs a federal justice department review

EricPWJohnson on March 25, 2009 at 11:33 AM

They didn’t choose those derivatives willingly. Stop ranting about “our tax money;” he never should have received it in the first place. You’re directing your anger at the wrong person.

John_Locke on March 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM

getalife on March 25, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Where were you yesterday when the market was down???

oh yeah..

sonofdy on March 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3