Glenn Beck to Megyn Kelly: Don’t you think the left is terrified of Palin?
posted at 9:35 pm on March 25, 2009 by Allahpundit
“They know where America is sitting,” says Beck of the ‘Cuda’s lefty persecutors, theorizing that she’s a clear and present danger to their hold on government in this political climate. Maybe so down the road, but where America is sitting as of last week is Obama 55, Palin 35. Another $5 trillion in bailouts and stimulus, though, and who knows?
Anyway, something here for those who find Greta’s pieces on Palin too hard-hitting. I was wrong, incidentally, in what I said earlier about the Rush/Levin interview. That’s not the reddest red-meat video ever. This is.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »
If you understood the process by which governors select judges in Alaska, you would understand why that happened.
Many people oppose gay marriage but support benefits. There is a difference for those who can think. Maybe Mitt would have to check the opinion polls or which state he was running in.
Mitt doesn’t understand Reagan…
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:21 AM
Romney Opposes the Boy Scouts’ Ban on Homosexual Scoutmasters
Despite the over 2,500 pedophilia cases now on record involving homosexual scout leaders, Romney stated, “I feel that all people should be allowed to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.” In the same article, a BSA official criticized Romney for opposing Scout policy.
- Boston Globe, 10/27/1994
Romney barred Boy Scouts from public participation in 2002 Olympics
The 2002 Olympics – run by Mitt Romney – was the only Olympics that restricted the Boy Scouts from participating. According to news reports, this was apparently because of pressure from homosexual activists. (But also, according to reports, homosexual groups participated fairly prominently.) Romney would not respond to reporters’ questions about that action. The largest Boy Scout council in the country responded to the call for volunteers issued by the Salt Lake Olympic Organizing Committee, but the welcome mat was rolled up and the door slammed in its face. Olympic spokesmen for the 2002 winter games say the exclusion has nothing to do with recent protests by gay activists. While the organizing committee for the Olympic event is prominently displaying a call for local volunteers, they have explicitly let it be known that the Boy Scouts need not apply. “For us not to be involved is discouraging, considering the Atlanta games. The Scouting council there was extremely involved,” said Kay Godfrey, professional Scout executive for the Great Salt Lake Council of Boy Scouts.
- NewsMax.com, Dec. 18, 2000
portlandon on March 26, 2009 at 1:22 AM
poptech-
Romney appointed prominent homosexual activists and Democrats as judges
“Governor Mitt Romney, who touts his conservative credentials to out-of-state Republicans, has passed over GOP lawyers for three-quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he has faced, instead tapping registered Democrats or independents — including two gay lawyers who have supported expanded same-sex rights, a Globe review of the nominations has found. Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show. In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters, and 14 registered Democrats.”
- Boston Globe 7/25/2005
portlandon on March 26, 2009 at 1:23 AM
The real Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:24 AM
Hey Poptech-
Romney favors “Assault” Weapons Ban
“He [Romney] is a supporter of the federal assault weapons ban.”
- Romney 2002 campaign website
Romney Favors Waiting Periods
Regarding the Brady Bill which required waiting periods to buy a handgun, Romney stated, “I don’t think [the waiting period] will have a massive effect on crime but I think it will have a positive effect.”
- Boston Herald, 8/1/1994
portlandon on March 26, 2009 at 1:25 AM
Palin’s degree is in Journalism with a minor in Political Science. Since you credit yourself with great expertise in economics due to a minor in that subject, I presume you will immediately recognize the relevance of her education — your standards, right? The joke’s on you, Fabio.
littleguy on March 26, 2009 at 1:25 AM
Hey poptech-
Romney Balances Budget with $500 Million in New Fees
“His first budget, presented under a cloud of a $2 billion deficit, balanced the budget with some spending cuts, but a $500 million increase in various fees was the largest component of the budget fix.” Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card – America’s Governors, 2004. Romney was rated a “C” overall by Cato.
portlandon on March 26, 2009 at 1:26 AM
You posted it , didn’t you and now , you’re backing out from what you posted in 11:51 pm . Let me tell you something , part of our problem came from people who had degrees as well as PHD’s and MBAs in economics and business and who understood the economic and business cycle , but because of economic or political ideology as well as unhealthy amount of greed and even worse , the supreme arrogance that they can do no wrong had put the United States in a financial black hole . Coupled with graduates of political science which honestly does not give it’s graduates honest work and the proliferation of law degrees in which lawyers out number the productive classes and whose leftist liberal graduates invented , implemented , sued , libeled , threatened , destroyed and morph this nations laws to their political benefit .
Yeah , Mrs Palin graduated with a degree in Journalism , so what . If she proves to be able to lead , why not her ? We had enough of this so called graduates in economics , business , law and political science working and being elected in the government . How about we elect an outsider for once who knowledge of running the government did not come from the classrooms , but in real life living as normal Americans
DinobotPrime on March 26, 2009 at 1:28 AM
Barack Obama
- B.A. Political Science, Columbia Univ.
- J.D., Harvard Law
- Taught Constitutional Law at Univ. of Chicago Law School
By your logic, and given Obama’s areas of academic concentration, we should have zero fear of Obama doing a single thing that will undermine the Constitution or the quintessentially-American system of government.
Unless, of course, the truth is that one’s academic resume has little to do with one’s real-world performance — because W’s Harvard MBA really helped while he was ignoring basic economic principles in pushing the bailout last autumn.
Harpazo on March 26, 2009 at 1:28 AM
Hey poptech-
Romney pledged to build the Massachusetts Republican Party, but in fact he did almost nothing. During his tenure there were two elections for the entire Legislature (2004 and 2006). In each election the Republicans lost seats. Republicans now hold the fewest seats in the Legislature since the Civil War.
During the four years of Romney’s tenure, the number of registered Republicans in Massachusetts fell by 31,000. During that same period, the Massachusetts Democratic Party gained 30,000.
- Boston Globe 11/2/2006
In the 2006 elections, most offices were not even challenged by Republican candidates. In the November general election for the six statewide Massachusetts constitutional offices there were more Green-Rainbow Party candidates on the ballot than Republicans!
The party’s slide has been so precipitous that Republicans yesterday did not contest 130 of 200 legislative seats, fielded a challenger in only three of 10 congressional districts, and put up fewer candidates for statewide office (three) than the Green-Rainbow Party (four).
- Boston Globe, 11/8/2006
In 2006, while Romney was chairman of the National Republican Governors Association – a group dedicated to electing more Republican governors – his own hand-picked Republican successor as governor lost badly to the Democrat, despite the fact that Republicans have held the governorship in Massachusetts since 1990. Romney largely ignored the Massachusetts elections and spent most of the time during the campaign out of state building his presidential campaign. He came back and publicly campaigned for the Republican candidate the day before the general election!
“Locally, this is a rebuke to Mitt Romney and checking out within six months after being elected and having accomplished almost nothing,” said [Jim] Rappaport [former chairman of the state Republican Party].
- Boston Globe, 11/8/2006
“Romney arrived on the scene with great promise, but is leaving the Republican Party here in shambles. Not only are the Republicans yielding the governor’s office for the first time in 16 years, but registered Republicans have fallen by 31,000 since Romney took office, and their legislative presence is at historic lows. But it worked out fine for him: He is now chasing the prize he really covets, the presidency.”
- Boston Globe 11/8/2006
“The Massachusetts Republican Party died last Tuesday. The cause of death: failed leadership. The party is survived by a few leftover legislators and a handful of county officials and grassroots activists who have been ignored for years. Services will be public and a mass exodus of taxpayers will follow. In lieu of flowers, send messages to New Hampshire Republican voters warning them about a certain presidential candidate named Romney.”
- Boston Herald, 11/12/2006
portlandon on March 26, 2009 at 1:30 AM
ROFLMAO! You guys are like a gold mine. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 1:31 AM
Mitt loves the Flip-Flop.
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:32 AM
little italy on March 26, 2009 at 1:20 AM
We travel a hard and twisted road! With the the likes of Barney, Ted, 57 flavors and Obama lite* its amazing there is actual responsible business activities taking place in this state*
* pimp my lilly white state (suckas) to secure wealth for my Homies….Deval Patrick just words….racist puke****
**** if a minority is not hired to fill a position of Authority…a full scale investigation is required by the Governor…. so say employees of the Commonwealth.
Paint the Whitehouse….BLACK! healing you will feel
dmann on March 26, 2009 at 1:36 AM
I guess actually running a business counts for nothing when it comes to understanding how economics works. I guess it’s just coincidence that bunch of J.D.’s in Congress and the whiz kid MBAs on Wall Street presided over the biggest financial meltdown in 80 years.
As someone with an advanced degree myself, I will attest that real world experience is worth about ten times what the degree is worth.
NoLeftTurn on March 26, 2009 at 1:37 AM
WOW, you guys were so DEAD ON earlier about the smell in here! *Whew*
/holds nose.
unwashed minion on March 26, 2009 at 1:38 AM
Way to explain yourself. You are coherent as your boy Mitt.
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:44 AM
Has anyone noticed that they have quietly added a Glen Beck replay at 11:00 PM PDT to the schedule?
More changes to come?
Old Dog on March 26, 2009 at 1:47 AM
Ouch this has to hurt…
Pro-Choice:
Palin picks former Planned Parenthood board member for Alaska Supreme Court (Associated Press)
Pro-Gay Marriage:
Same-sex benefits ban gets Palin veto (Anchorage Daily News)
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 1:47 AM
Mitt strikes again!
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:48 AM
NoLeftTurn on March 26, 2009 at 1:37 AM
Far to conservative for the field of semiconductor manufacturing or for that matter any highly technical enterprise that involves tolerances we cannot resolve/nor explain.
More distractions for the Black guy………
dmann on March 26, 2009 at 1:49 AM
Mitt on Gay Marriage…
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 1:55 AM
That is fantastic, he rejected the socialist legislation.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 1:59 AM
And…
Palin picks former Planned Parenthood board member for Alaska Supreme Court (Associated Press)
You are talking to the wrong person because I really do not care about civil unions.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 2:01 AM
Which is opposed to what he said during the campaign. What a shock, Romney changed his mind. Too bad he didn’t reject the socialist romneycare. According to him, the only difference between his plan and Hillary’s was that his got passed.
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 2:08 AM
How did Mitt feel about gay marriage? If I had to guess, he probably changed his mind.
What a shock!
V15J on March 26, 2009 at 2:11 AM
He still vetoed it. Mitt is the man.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 2:16 AM
Nah…nice try though. :) Palin supporters have been on top of these things for awhile. Maybe you’ll get further sticking with your “capping emissions” spiel.
unwashed minion on March 26, 2009 at 2:57 AM
test
dmann on March 26, 2009 at 3:02 AM
I think I’ve found Poptech’s picture and profile!
now to some rebuttals of my own.
Given a chioce between a (pro-choice and neutral on private property) and b (pro-choice and vehemently against private property) I’d make the same pick – ande so would you if you are eve3n half the libertarian you lie in your claims to be.
There is a legisslature involved somewhere in there. She is Governor, not Queen.
Yup. Now show me what those earmarks were for (most of them continuing mandates from the Fed, I’d wager.)
Yup. From a previous 22.5 a whopping 2.5% increase. This was all done through public hearings rather than through back-room deals. I suppose you have a comparison of what the levy rates are for other states?
I’ll leave this rebuttal to Charlie.
I don’t know why I am bothering. PDS Poptech will just ignore the meat and continue this superficial, don’t-look-into-the-facts assault by repetition regardless of reality.
Honesty is not in him/her/it.
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on March 26, 2009 at 3:08 AM
Pardon my speeling erurz.
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on March 26, 2009 at 3:12 AM
Cannot copy and past from Word….WTF? Also no Preview….
dmann on March 26, 2009 at 3:36 AM
Only this post….someone F’d it Fairness Docturine?
dmann on March 26, 2009 at 3:39 AM
AM
Poptech is not over at the Romney threads but says he is a Romney supporter. Yet he spends all his time trying to trash Palin on Palin threads. Hmmm….trollish behavior for sure.
sarahpalinfan99 on March 26, 2009 at 4:41 AM
Megyn Kelly is hot. Sarah Palin is cooooool….I dig her. I am glad she makes the libtards crazy.
But you dou—heads going after Romney over WHAT HE SAID IN 1994 WHEN HE WAS A POLITICAL NOVICE are guilty of the over-reach that they are complaining the libtards do re Palin.
Any other great candidate who over time became more conservative, you would welcome him/her with open arms. But not Romney. And we know why, dont we? May you all burn in hell. thanks!!
The Wall on March 26, 2009 at 4:58 AM
Romney is an effective manager and a great businessman. I just find him to be dull as cold pancakes without syrup politically. I voted for him in the Texas primaries as a better choice than McLame, but if I had a more inspiring choice, I would have went for it. The ability to inspire is at least as important as policy positions in politics, perhaps more.
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on March 26, 2009 at 6:04 AM
but with the ancestry linked to Princess Di….
there has to be some way that just isnt true….
alexraye on March 26, 2009 at 6:43 AM
Well this was pretty obvious; The trolls came out en masse to take over this thread about Palin. If it’s not fear, it’s derangement of the highest order. It’s kind of sad that the same fools that started when the thread was posted were still foaming at the mouth about it several hours later.
anniekc on March 26, 2009 at 7:45 AM
Megyn Kelly is a lawyer, TV host, smart and beautiful.
God gave with both hands twice.
RobCon on March 26, 2009 at 8:09 AM
Poptech ~
It’s obvious enough with your many posts that you hate Sarah Palin, who can’t say enough of BHO who’s popularity is dropping and Mitt who is just another RINO. I guess you like Mitt’s socialized healthcare system for his state, you can have it, no thanks for me!! Both parties are corrupt to the core, time to think about a 3rd party.
corvettelady on March 26, 2009 at 8:14 AM
Yup. I wouldn’t mind a third party alternative.
True_King on March 26, 2009 at 8:23 AM
I hope Palin succeeds.
bluelightbrigade on March 26, 2009 at 8:33 AM
Damnit, quit bashing possible 2012 candidates. We’ve got a bunch who would make McCain look like the pandering old RINO he is. Romney, Sanford, Palin, Jindal…Doesn’t matter who it is, just give me someone conservative and articulate and let’s roll.
therightwinger on March 26, 2009 at 8:40 AM
If bloggers Poptart and Rhino Queen’s reaction to this post are the indicators, then I think Megyn and Glenn got the story right…the left is scared.
Passionate-Conservative on March 26, 2009 at 8:44 AM
Those who are so emotionally attached to “hating” Governor Palin will never calm down enough to wait until the primaries to see of what she is really made.
Those with an open mind, yet have reservations about any candidate, will give candidates a chance to persuade them.
I, for one, find it amusing that those who attack the Governor of Alaska are not willing to observe how she would run her own campaign without having to caryy McCain’s shit bucket.
Saltysam on March 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
rotflmfao
O Creator of Worlds, from a cultural anthropology perspective it is purely hilarious to watch your commentariat devolve into primitive stone age tribalism complete with fundamentalism, shunning of defectors, and magical thinking.
strangelet on March 26, 2009 at 8:55 AM
C’mon….admit it.
Palin is an ex-beauty pageant contestant that still speaks in Heartland Pageant Speak and would still be a fishgutter in Wasalia if not for the accident of her looks.
Palin only appeals to ONLY the incredible shrinking hardcore christianist base.
It is your old enemy, ToE, that will condemn you to rump status for decades: demographic evolution and cultural evolution.
Every passing year there are more minorities, more liberals, more urban dwellers, more youth and more college-educated in the electorate.
Palin is electoral poison for all those demographics.
strangelet on March 26, 2009 at 9:07 AM
OMG Another Palin post from Allapundit.
Methinks Allapundit doth protest too much. You’re really in love with her, aren’t you AP? You are just too nerdy and insecure to admit it. You just can’t get her off your mind (Is that a song title?). Be a mensch. Stand up and tell the truth. I know she’s married, but there is always a chance. I know; It’s the big gun – you’ve never seen one up close.
Old Country Boy on March 26, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Do you use a bucket to collect the little balls of shit that roll out of your mouth, or do you leave a trail for your moonbat ilk to gobble up?
csdeven on March 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM
Palin could field dress Obama’s teleprompter in under five minutes.
profitsbeard on March 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Poptech etal, does what trolls do..make one or two comments..link to some ambiguous crap, and sit back and have people compose and post thousands of words to try and enlighten the dim. No effort on their part. Its some odd form of entertainment.
Psychological welfare…free ego food. Cut ‘em off.
Itchee Dryback on March 26, 2009 at 9:58 AM
Not only the left, but also the elitist, upper-crust of the Republican Party, as well. Right now Obama is pounding the scions of Wall Street, bankers, CEOs and “the rich” — these are the Ivy League’s finest, the intelligencia, the most powerful in our society. This is very much like the lion devouring her mate, but after hearing for months how only someone from this lofty strata of our society could possibly be allowed to become President, the ultimate effect of this campaign is to undermine trust in the elite across the board. The elite don’t mind rabble-rousing so long as they can maintain control, but God forbid one of the rabble would presume to rise up to challenge them. This is the story of the left — there is always an elite to tell the proletariat how to act and think; they can never be allowed to think for themselves. Oddly, this is also the story of the elite on the right, as well. Strange times make for strange bedfellows, eh?
littleguy on March 26, 2009 at 10:02 AM
You know after reading some of the more vitriolic posts about Governor Palin in this thread I have come to believe that the reason why the mere mention of her name sends the trolls on this site into a frenzy is because deep down they are afraid of women and believe that a woman’s place is at home in the kitchen and not in the White House making executive decisions.
But then again that is exactly the sort of attitude toward women I would expect from a bunch of socially maladjusted and emotionally retarded super geeks, who live in their mothers basement and spend their time getting their jollys by anonymously ripping on people who have achieved more in one day than they have in their entire life.
Whether you like Governor Palin or not you have to admit that she is an extraordinary woman who has achieved a hell of a lot more in her life than a significant number of other people that have had a lot more advantages and opportunities than she ever did. And whats more she did it all with out the sort of political and financial patronage that a lot of today’s political elite seem to require in order to achieve high elected office.
Dreadnought223 on March 26, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Im pretty sure that she could hang with the Founding Fathers.
They might be a bit surprised, but Im sure they would have lots more in common than with ocommy.
Sonosam on March 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Im pretty sure the Founders would have recognized Palin as a demagogue, a populist candidate with no qualifications for the high office.
strangelet on March 26, 2009 at 10:21 AM
I’m pretty sure everybody recognizes you as an Axelrod drone
joey24007 on March 26, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Time to pop in and pile Poptech, because of the statements made.
Let’s remember the left has turned politics into an upscale popularity contest based on looks and imaging, which Gov. Palin has in spades. So how do they beat her?
Because the left do as told, think as told, and follow the leader others have determined is the leader they open their playbook to begin discrediting Gov. Palin.
So what have the left (Poptech) chosen to use to discredit Gov. Palin. So Gov. Palin is not smart enough (educated as a journalist-Poptech 11:51) and too pretty to hold any office (who won beauty pageants, she has relied on her looks and charm to get where she is-Poptech 11:51).
Now for critical thinkers. Who are the best friends of the left? Journalists. What does the left insist their candidates have to enable journalists to sell-looks and charm. The left is just jealous that Gov. Palin is not a socialist.
MSGTAS on March 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Palin 35, Obama 55? Are you kidding me? Against as sitting President, one that just got into offic, this is incredibly good for Palin. Another 10% and they’re tied. I had no idea she was this popular.
MrX on March 26, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Short answer no. Long answer Hell NO.
Terry Silver on March 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Meghan is right about the fear factor. The ethics stuff is starting to be funny as birthers.
AnninCA on March 26, 2009 at 11:30 AM
It’s actually PhD.
And the fact that she doesn’t have one is a bonus in my book, being overeducated and underpaid myself. The whole point of a graduate degree is to transition from absorbing knowledge to creating new knowledge. Palin already does the political equivalent of that quite well.
Bob's Kid on March 26, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Based on the Zogby polling for Zeigler, most lefties need to be told whom to fear. The puppet masters are busy trying to tamp down the front runners, Palin and any other potential candidate who stands up in public, which could be considered a form of fear. It looks like the bumbling, Doh-bama himself is their greatest fear right now, though. Gird your loins, boys!
littleguy on March 26, 2009 at 11:41 AM
They are so cute and so real, but also they are both RIGHT. One hundred percent! I mean, we have all followed politics in one way or the other, and once the curtains close, the follow-up on former presidential candidates dims quite significantly. In this case, with Sarah, it hasn’t happened!
The agenda is so clear with those politicians and civilians that hold power to a more and lesser degree in this country. To the rest of us, bloggers and such, it is even more intense because we don’t necessarily have to answer to anyone but ourselves. It is amazing that because they think that because Sarah’s merely a woman, she will be an easy target to take down.
But yet, Sarah is holding strong, hasn’t gone away and she won’t be!
The attacks, coming from left to right (unfortunately) have done nothing but keep her constantly present in the MSM and in the blogosphere. The closer we get to get rid of (I love this word from yesterday!) CLOT, like she said if the door opens, she’ll go open it and go through it!
The main people that I see that really hate and oppose her, are the ones that dealt with Rhode Vs. Wade (sp?), the bra marches, all those feminist movements in the 60s.
As Americans, those that really care about our country, are starting to realize the dangers of wrong decisions, laziness and agendas. We are becoming more conscious of what is going on because of the tea parties we are throwing, I believe the July 4th march to DC will be somewhat strong, believe me I would sleep a lot better at night knowing that she is POTUS.
Now that we are all done (most of us I guess) with that crap of race, being brown, yellow, black, purple and so on-smack-I forgot! MUSLIMS too! there is no big deal if a lady with such values, convictions and such a clear and American upbringing as Sarah can be the next best thing after Reagan.
Riiiight?
I ordered Levin’s audiobook and I should get it in the mail today. But Allah, my real fantasy and the reddest of all USDA Top Choice meats would be a Palin-Limbaugh interview.
I know that hundreds of thousands of Americans are waking up, and we will see on April 15th the real deal with the National Tea Parties. I will attend one in my city…will you go to yours?
On a final note, my husband does not WANT to believe in the worst possible case scenario that Obama “represents” to the country. Some advice from this wonderful group will be appreciated to help me help him open his eyes. I got the Bibles but don’t got the guns. And that is very uncomfortable to me!
Cheerio, PPF
ProudPalinFan on March 26, 2009 at 11:44 AM
***
Sarah Palin is the only real conservative candidate I saw in the 2008 election. She doesn’t just talk the good fight–she demonstrates it in her own life. No abortion when she found out Trig would be a Down’s Syndrome baby–just courage in giving him life and loving him.
***
Ditto on her daughter’s unmarried pregnancy–no abortion–just help out the daughter and her novio.
***
Ditto on negotiating a better deal from the state’s cut of the Alaska oil companies profits–she didn’t raise government spending with the money. SHE GAVE IT BACK TO THE TAXPAYERS–when did your governor, representative, or senator do this?
***
The “SarahCuda” did not go to the best schools–she went to the same type of state school I did. She did not make herself rich at taxpayer expense–neither did I. She lives a modest life style with the same husband she started out with–so do I–with my original wife of 39 years.
***
Who has better experience to be the President–someone who has served in the executive branch of government and has had to prepare budgets and approve laws for the benefit of the people? Or someone from the “lets make a deal” legislative branch of government?
***
Do you want conventional affordable energy–or do you want very expensive, unproven, and dangerous “pie in the sky” energy in the future?
***
Do you think cutting deals with terrorist supporting governments or releasing terrorists into our country will strengthen our country? Will gutting the Military help?
***
GO SARAHCUDA 2012! I’m going to vote for her if she runs–Ronald Reagan style conservative common sense should win out over RINO / liberal / democratic / socialist / marxist / communist dreams after President O’Bummer (PBUH) finishes trashing our country in the next two years. The handwriting is on the wall.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on March 26, 2009 at 11:50 AM
The hilarious thing is that Poppy declared that Political Science, even undergrad, would be fine, too. When revealed that Palin’s degree was with a minor in Political Science, all he had to say was…. well, let’s just say the silence was deafening. Even more amusing is the fact that Poppy credits himself with great expertise in economics via a minor in Economics as an undergrad, but will not concede Palin’s expertise. He talks about running a company, but won’t even concede her experience as the Governor of Alaska. We definitely need and deserve a better class of troll!
littleguy on March 26, 2009 at 11:50 AM
All I need to know is where to donate for the Sarah Palin Legal Defense Fund.
bluelightbrigade on March 26, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Thanks for this information, the most useful information I have gained about Romney who as a speaker impressed me.
Assault weapons bans tend to reflect the voting populace. No politician can win if his constitutents have the opposite opinion, but Romney had did not hold office during the 2002 O;ympics in the Mormon capital of America, so I take his stand as sincerely anti Boy Scout
Palin has done enormously well considering she was unknown before the Presidential election, and during the election her image was controlled by the McCain camp, who let her out for one major interview, a taped edited interview by the opposition, while the MSM was given freedom to take her down, since the McCain camp obviously feared letting Palin loose
That is the source of the frantic pre emptive assault on her image. Although Palin ran in a Presidential campaign, she has not had control over her own image building. Should she get funding to let loose using her own instincts, which are far superior to either John McCain’s or his daughter’s, people will see the complete Palin
Both the MSM and the McCain camp already worked her negatives to death, the MSM directly and the McCain camp by acting as if Palin had to be kept back.
There is no where for Palin to go except boosting her positives. She seems to be good at it.
I would be interested to see Palin unleashed because I need more info beyond the staging too. Especially with the Romney Boy Scout b.s. which is inexcusable IMHO
entagor on March 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Re: Attorneys
Shakespeare was right.
ZOMG DEATH THREATZ!!1!1 BAN HIM!
Anyway.
TheUnrepentantGeek on March 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM
“We have too many damned attorneys in Washington.”
We have too many damned attorneys in government!
As a child, I used to think that if only attorneys were elected as legislators, that the laws would be written without loopholes. I was taught to respect attorneys of law until I learned that more often than not, MY interests are certainly not theirs, not really, as GENERALLY, their principles only matter as far as money goes. And as there are truly too many of them, the Obama and Edwards conglomerate style of attorneys in government have bloated corruption into the insurmountable Goliath. Even David must rely on an attorney as his pebble against all odds.
Yes, I appreciate more than ever those attorneys who, like Fred Thompson, do their best in political legislation to conserve and protect our Constitution.
More Freds. Less Johns.
maverick muse on March 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM
The mantra of the left, destroy ANY up and coming Republican. And most the time, us conservatives/Republican’s help them out.. I AM SICK OF IT. WE MUST STAND TOGETHER.. The moderate conservatives AND the pro-life conservatives……
reshas1 on March 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM
There is no such thing as a ‘moderate’ conservative. You are either moderate or conservative. But to call someone a moderate conservative doesn’t make any sense.
Call them a moderate, or call them a conservative.
Sapwolf on March 26, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Perhaps a moderate conservative is something like a progressive conservative?
Dreadnought223 on March 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Conservatives have been described as being Social or Fiscal Conservatives. I think we need a new category, the Ivy League, or Elitist Conservative to explain the sneering nastiness of self-described conservatives like Frum and Brooks.
littleguy on March 26, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Here is a newsmax article on Palin’s popularity in Alaska, 03-19-07
61.3 percent of Alaskans positive or very positive
32.7 percent negative or somewhat negative
05-2007 before the Presidential election her general popularity was 89 percent
This is pretty good considering Obama had massive good press and Palin had massive bad press including from GOP RINOs
entagor on March 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM
One of the reasons I think Palin looks better than the other GOP hopefuls at this point is the sense of energy and excitement surrounding her. Conservatives should be clear about the dimensions of the horrible mistake voters made last November. The changes being forced upon this country by the Obama administration are enormous and transformative, as Obama himself likes to say, in a rare bout of naked honesty. In just a few short months, we’ve moved farther to the left than Reagan was able to move the country to the right in eight years. It’s been a blind rush into abject socialism, doubling and tripling the national debt with such dizzying speed that neither the public, nor the financial markets, have fully absorbed the effects yet. And the “transformative changes” just keep coming, reshaping institutions to fit Obama’s ideological agenda, or the political needs of his party.
Besides looking at a candidate’s chances of winning the next election, conservatives should consider what that candidate is likely to do, once they get into office. Searching for a candidate who holds your exact position on every issue is futile – no such person exists, and the quest to find them is likely to produce a bitter, divisive primary, yielding a candidate without the necessary groundswell of support. Even if such a candidate was able to defeat a publicly-reviled Obama, they wouldn’t be able to *do* anything significant once they got into office. If you take a clear look at where America stands today, you can see that months of Obama have already done damage that might take years or decades of incremental change to repair. How far does America have to journey, just to get back to Bush’s bloated government? We’ve degenerated into the early stages of true fascism, with political leaders openly advocating violence and unconstitutional tyranny against selected class-war targets. I would submit the American pendulum has *never* swung as far right as it currently stands to the left.
To repair the damage that has been done, we’re going to have to do a lot better than re-running 2008 but having somebody like McCain win this time. 2010 and 2012 will be dangerous times for America, but also moments of rare opportunity. The absurdity, inefficiency, and tyranny of American socialism have never been made as obvious as they are today. Conservatives used to win arguments with liberals by describing what liberalism would look like, if taken to absurd extremes – and now we’re actually living under it. And the real effects of Obamanomics haven’t even been felt yet – the gigantic loss of market value and real wealth over the last few months has been a combination of fallout from unwise policies during the later Bush years, combined with fear of what Obama says he will do.
Now that American businesses know without doubt that taxation without representation and bills of attainder are back, Atlas will finally begin to shrug. The only thing we can be certain of is that whoever runs AIG now won’t be as good as the people Obama has all but driven out of the country. Business plans are being made now that will bear bitter fruit in the coming years… and we haven’t even seen what America’s *enemies* will do yet.
The next president has to be someone bold enough to rise to the occasion and seize the moment. It has to be someone who will do more than just scale back the excesses of the previous administration. A 15% cut in Obama’s monstrous deficits will not get the job done. We need someone with the charisma and energy to inspire Americans to take a sober look at what happened to them between 2009 and 2012, and challenge them to do *more* than just limp back to the broken system we had under Bushes and Clinton. We need someone with the juice to get people talking about the true reforms and paradigm changes needed to burn the old system down and replace with something that promotes liberty and achievement – things like flat taxes and Congressional term limits.
We need, not a “moderate conservative” or “centrist”, but a conservative radical – a visionary. There’s no way to tell if any of the current contestants have these qualities, but so far, Palin is the only one who has shown the faintest glimmer of the electricity that will be required. I hope there are others – I’d love to have an embarrassment of riches to choose from.
Doctor Zero on March 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM
Well said.
Leftist followers are useful idiots in every sense of those words. They are adults in chronology only – emotionally retarded, sad-ass juveniles projecting their own “broken-ness” onto others and desperate for *any* illusion of control in life. This is what ultimately makes them useful idiots. They viscerally loathe adults who are stable, authentic individuals, particularly those who dare to publicly profess faith in a Creator.
On the other hand, the Left’s leadership are not idiots. They are vile megalomaniacs despising every aspect of our cuture and civilization, obsessed with destroying us. Their goals are simple: power and domination.
They will always despise anyone in the public sphere who is like Sarah Palin. She is the epitome of the positive aspects of our great nation. You can bet your sweet a$$ I’ll work, donate, do whatever is needed, to help get her elected! *grin*
kooziegirl on March 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Hey Fabio…. don’t you think that you should try to keep crap straight … and maybe stay out of politics in Alaska.
You sure don’t know sh!t!
upinak on March 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Troll are becoming a trivial thing.
upinak on March 26, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Would the left give Palin even an ounce of attention if she was no threat? Of course not. The fact they do give her & Rush ALL the attention lets you know who the effective opponents of liberalism are.
Norwegian on March 26, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Poptech Fabio is a joke. Nobody here takes him seriously. Too bad he is so deranged that he doesn’t realize it himself.
Only a matter of time before this spamming moron gets banned.
Norwegian on March 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Ah, Poptech doesn’t want a real discussion. He just rehashes huffpo talking points.
Notice when Romney’s tax hikes were exposed, he is strangely silent.
Hey Poptech…how come you aren’t defending his record of bringing people into the Republican party in Mass? Oh that’s right, they lost membership..
Duh!
husker3000 on March 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Palin scares everyone who fear strong smart women, or inspiring conservatives.
.
As someone tired of voting against socialists, I hope she runs.
darktood on March 26, 2009 at 4:33 PM
He has to show us he is, not just tell us.
That is the problem, these guys say they are, then when the vote comes they back-down.
He has not much of anything to show us he is conservative…yet most of his actions have shown he is not.
Strange for a person who spiritual life is so tied to “works”, his “works” shows he is not a conservative.
Brilliant? Certainly…Great hair? The best…Business experience? Yes…Political savvy? His father made sure of that…Conservative? Hasn’t shown it…Coattails? Absolutely not…Connects to the voters? No…he just isn’t what conservatives are looking for. What Mormon’s are looking for? Obviously, but that is a small % of voters.
He should work on being a conservative, then a team player, then he can run as a conservative…having money and being religious is not a conservative criteria, just ask Reid.
right2bright on March 26, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Hey, Pooptech…
Do you know: (1) How the governor in Alaska is required to select judges, and (2) Whom the alternative to the one chosen was?
. . .
I didn’t think so…..
It baffoon time…..
seanrobins on March 26, 2009 at 4:35 PM
This is an understatment…Palin is over 60% because she is worth those numbers.
No matter how hard they tried, her numbers remain strong…and she deserves those numbers, and they will improve.
right2bright on March 26, 2009 at 4:38 PM
Or you can call them “losers”. Or “timid souls who don’t dare admit to being lefties”.
ddrintn on March 26, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Says a supporter of the guy and party that just rigged up a lot of phony populist outrage over some AIG employees collecting bonuses authorized by that guy and that party.
I think I can say pretty well on which side the Founders would stand, and which one they would designate the
“demagogue”.
ddrintn on March 26, 2009 at 5:16 PM
strangelet
Actually , they would recognized her as one of their own because of who she is , regardless of her gender . And guess what , Obama can be considered a demagogue because he uses propaganda , fear , emotions of the populace to gain political advantage as well as to hide his lack of leadership qualities and competence in regards to his elected position .
DinobotPrime on March 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Thanks Doc. Another sober and excellent analysis of the kind of extraordinary person you will need to transform us back to a republic of freedom, opportunity, and respect for the Constitution.
That person will HAVE TO HAVE COURAGE.
Who is the only one exhibiting courage now? Duh, the moosehunting mommabear extraordinaire.
Her time is coming.
Sapwolf on March 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM
Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on March 26, 2009 at 3:08 AM
Random,
Here is Poop Tourettes picture and profile.
http://newsbusters.org/bios/populartech.html
He spams any thread that mentions Gov Palin over at Newsbusters. He actually posts links from Kos and MSNBC to support his position.
What a douCHE he is.
Scuba Dude on March 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM
Prove it.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 8:06 PM
Poptech, we know you’re hurting, we know that you’re a seriously disturbed and pathetic individual whose obsession borders dangerously on psychosis. It may require copious therapy and medication but if you’ll just ponder this one fact and learn to accept it you will be well on your way to getting better again:
Sarah Palin is more man than you’ll ever be and more woman than you’ll ever get.
OlympicLeprechaun on March 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Poptech -grow up
Jamson64 on March 26, 2009 at 9:05 PM
ROFLMAO! You have never seen my lady. I know in you minds you really believe this nonsense but it is the male supporters of Palin who can’t get someone like her. When you can get women better looking than her you can look at things objectively and not through the naughty glasses.
Poptech on March 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM
Poptech at 9:11 PM
You have never seen my lady.
True, but is she a beauty queen? That seems to be the only characteristic of Governor Palin that you take note of, always in a disparaging fashion I should add. But now you downplay it. The consistency of the liberal mind–and don’t give me the garbage about being a conservative. Not buying it anymore.
Also considering that virtually all of your awake time is apparently consumed by convulsions of laughter on the floor in front of your keyboard, the poor girl obviously is woefully unsatisfied. Is she aware of your obsession with Governor Palin? Or is she constantly ROFLMAO as well when you unzip your pants?
“Can’t get someone like her.” That statement implies that you believe that she is indeed attractive, then in the next sentence you dismiss her looks altogether. Which is it? Either way you are deeply in denial about your fixation on her. Did she turn you down for a date or something?
I won’t deny that I think she is sexy as hell, but at least I can admit that.
OlympicLeprechaun on March 26, 2009 at 9:27 PM
demagogue–
defn (pejorative) an orator or leader who gains favor by exciting the passions and prejudices of the audience.
Palin has no other qualifications….she cannot articulate her views, she has little education, and no formed foreign or economic policy.
Thom Jefferson was a polymath.
Palin is a retard.
Doubt they’d have much in common.
;)
strangelet on March 26, 2009 at 9:34 PM
Palin ran on a platform of dogwhistle racism and class warfare. She ran on the “real” america vs. the “unreal” america. She ran on a platform of exclusion.
Excluding academy, youth, intellectuals, urban dwellers, non-xians, blacks, browns, colleged-educated, gays, hindus, hollywood, jews, etc, etc.
Obama ran on a platform of inclusion, eg, we are all americans.
The problem is, Palin’s “real” america is now a minority.
So you lost.
And you keep losing until until you get a get a clue from conservatives like Meghan McCain and David Frum.
No skin off my nose.
strangelet on March 26, 2009 at 9:42 PM
strangelet
I’m pretty sure at least she can pronounce “orion”.
Did you call Al Gore a retard when he couldn’t identify statues of our Founding Fathers, mistranslated our national motto, and stated that a zebra had spots?
Did you notice when Bill Clinton said that the phrase “by the people, of the people, and for the people” comes from the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, flirted with a mummy, and mispronounced “chameleon”?
Of course not (fingers in ears, chanting “la la la la…”
What did you think of Hillary’s speech in ebonics, or her joke about Gandhi running a gas station? How about Howie YAAAAAHH! Dean and his extensive foreign policy creds?
Demagogue? Yeah, gotta love how she stoked up all those death threats against AIG.
Yes, I’m sure your intellect is dazzling, much like that of Joe Biden, and that you would be a much superior governor than Sarah Palin.
Pal, you aren’t fit to lick the moose blood off her hunting boots. Not that she’d ever let that fetid sewer in your face ever get that close to her. But considering what a good shot she reportedly is, please feel free to try
OlympicLeprechaun on March 26, 2009 at 9:54 PM
Gee, in this comment the second link about the one where you mention here reading the Economist your link is to a youtube video of Chris “Tingles” Matthew of MSNBC!!!!!
My oh my.
Link 1
And this comment where you link polls by MSNBC and Emily’s List which support pro-choice Democrats, talk about bias.
Link 2
And look here, you link to Andrew Sullivan at The Atlantic, a real non-partisan there
Link 3
So this shows that you will use leftist sights to support your beliefs.
Scuba Dude on March 26, 2009 at 10:16 PM
Okay wingnuts, listen up, yes Caribou Barbie is loved by the base. But, you can’t win elections with 30% of the electorate! You need 51%. Even Megyn Kelly said people either love her or hate her. I don’t hate her, but I know she is a ditz. Being the Queen of Alaska and running for president,against an incumbent whose get out the vote campaign was legendary, are two different worlds. I want her to run so bad,please Barbie, run so we can ridicule your speech and your ignorance. Maybe pick Joe the Plumber as vp, he’s even dumber than you.
athensboy on March 26, 2009 at 10:29 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »