Red, red meat: Mark Levin on statism and Limbaugh as conservative leader
posted at 6:19 pm on March 24, 2009 by Allahpundit
Via Greg Hengler and Townhall, a crowd-pleasing palate cleanser to mark the release of his new book, which the boss pronounces must-reading. Hopefully success won’t mellow him: I don’t get a chance to listen to his show often but he’s much more subdued here than what I’m used to. Exit question: Imagine this lineup. Beck at 7, O’Reilly at 8, Hannity at 9 … and Levin at 10? They could move Greta’s Sarah Palin/Natalee Holloway hour of power to 11 and push the O’R/Hannity reruns back an hour. You’d watch, admit it.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
You think she has a job? Other than maybe getting paid for trolling?
myrenovations on March 24, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Oh…I see. You were talking about politicos wanting more. And I thought you were referring to us conservatives in your first post.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:00 PM
I’d watch Levin with his own show in a second. However, I doubt it will happen. He is asked frequently why he isn’t on more often at least as a contributor, and always answers that radio is his first love and isn’t terribly interested in moving to television. But if he can be convinced to do so, I’d hope he is not as mellow as he was in this clip. That was not exactly “The Great One” that I know and love. ~ “Get off the phone you big dope!”
Warmongerer on March 24, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Romeo:
I have principles too. I do not have a problem with anyone having principles. I have a problem with them telling me that they think Obama and the Democrats are scourges while they refuse to support the Republican running against them. Unless of course the Republican is the right sort of Republican and agrees with them on every single thing and voted against the Drug Prescription Plan and opposed Harriet Miers and fought against Dubai etc.
It is called cutting off your nose to spite your face. If Reagan had been that damn picky he would never would have won.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:01 PM
FIFY
Knucklehead on March 24, 2009 at 7:02 PM
Indeed the demographic of the late seventies served that coalition well. But Bush/Cheney 04 needed to tweak the coalition so far in order to scrape out a victory that the modern demographic realities can no longer keep us winning when the pandering sheds more votes than it energizes.
barkolounger on March 24, 2009 at 7:02 PM
good one, knucklehead.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 7:02 PM
Bill O will a. have to get in closer touch with his Conservative side, or b. become less of a “factor” in our growing movement. In this environment, people are wanting more Conservatism, not fence-riding.
marklmail on March 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Yes.
anniekc on March 24, 2009 at 7:03 PM
genso:
No, I am not talking about politicos. I am talking about the American people, the voters, the taxpayers. The people who actually do support Medicare and like the drug program. The people who sent their sons off to war. The people who are concerned about their jobs and their futures. That is who wants a lot of this stuff and Republicans need to give them viable alternatives.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Thanks for your kind response.
I never claimed support for Bush determined whether one is the real deal or not, I simply meant that Bush created government on a level that was astounding. I was disappointed by the country club mentality of that era, I wish the Congress would at least have held him back but they too spent along with him. If your friends like that kind of governance, then they are the real deal unto themselves, that’s fine, I have different principles that’s why I’m not a Republican.
Yes, in comparison Bush is a Libertarian when contrasted with Obama. But I feel that laid down the foundation that set us up to have an Obama. Bush did nothing to defend himself or his party and allowed him and the Pubs to be defined by others. It worked. Couple that with all the anti-conservative legislation by both Bush and Congress, and they discouraged a good portion of the base. Those things, as well as others, were a great recipe for an Obama win.
Maybe if we had held Bush accountable we wouldn’t have gotten an Obama.
True_King on March 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Some of us care a helluva lot more about country than party.
AZCoyote on March 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM
barfalounger just wants us all to give up and be democrats. Just ignore it.
I wonder what Cavuto gave Levin to make him so darn calm. I have seen Levin on Hannity’s show, he has a natural charm that just makes you want to hear more. Definately a man that could do both radio and television.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM
I think a Republican President and Congress who spent like drunken socialists is the problem. Blaming it on the voters is a bit too much. Do you think McCain would be THAT much different than Obama?
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Mark Levin is a sharp, mince-no-words conservative. I like that in a spokesman. He would cream Obama in a debate over Constitutional issues.
onlineanalyst on March 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM
Big Levin fan. Went to Barnes and Noble earlier today and couldn’t find it..what the hell is up with that? And he’s not on in this market….I smell a conspiracy…:-)
therightwinger on March 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM
The problem is that Mark Levin is conservative and the Republican party at this point in time is not.
I’d watch Levin in a heartbeat! I listen to him every chance I get! I intend to buy his book at Barnes and Noble where they are forced to see someone buying conservatism as soon as I get paid on Friday!
Vntnrse on March 24, 2009 at 7:06 PM
And sometimes it takes an adult to say simply, “We can’t afford that.” What you want is a continuation of failing programs branded with an R.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Good. I think I’ll watch too. His agenda is unstoppable at this point and the Republicans are going along with it so it must be good legislation. After all, we both know that the Republicans have proven themselves to be big spenders so its hard for them to talk and be taken seriously.
True_King on March 24, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Another threat to American liberty (HT: NRO)
Wethal on March 24, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Get back to me when blue states like California aren’t still passing bans on gay marriage, Americans don’t list Obama’s rescinding of a pro-life measure as his least popular move, and less than an overwhelming majority supports teaching creationism in school.
amerpundit on March 24, 2009 at 7:08 PM
Sorry, but I don’t buy the “tailor your message after the demographics” crap.
If what you say is true, why is the GOP now leading in generic polls? It’s not like the GOP has drastically changed in the past 4 months.
Politics is always cyclical, the pendulum will turn left and right as time passes. Sticking to principles is always the way to go.
Norwegian on March 24, 2009 at 7:09 PM
genso:
I work in health care. When that program came along it helped people. You see, these people are already on Medicare, that means that just about everyone on this blog is related to someone using that program. It is not a gift, people pay into and they get a discount on their drugs. If they can not afford their drugs, the American taxpayer ends up paying more for their care. That is a reality, just going on about drunken sailors does not change the fact that we are now looking at a president that does not want to create a discount program for drugs that is means tested, he wants to nationalize medicine.
That is the difference.
In 2006, when the Democrats took Congress over the deficit was down to about $153 billion. That is too high I know, but compare that to 3 trillion tell me which is worse.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
It’s either behind the counter and you have to ask for it (like they did with Obamanation) or it says on Amazon, its release date is March 29th.
I got my copy a month ago, free, thru the Amazon Vine progam.
Knucklehead on March 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Nearly every book that I have tried to buy by a conservative in Barnes & Noble has to be special ordered. I’m talking about current titles and well-known authors. The bookseller simply does not place many titles by conservatives on its shelves nor in a prominent place.
onlineanalyst on March 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Fixed.
portlandon on March 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
I saw Mark Levin speak when he opened up for Sean Hannity in Houston about four years ago. He really fired up the crowd and we wanted him to just keep going. He deserves all the success in the world!
alwaysright43 on March 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
And yes, genso I think McCain would be a lot different from Obama. For one thing, I honestly believe McCain loves and values this country. I am not so sure that can be said of Obama. I think it is a ridiculous question.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Seven Percent Solution on March 24, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Christians as “bigots”.
amerpundit on March 24, 2009 at 6:57 PM
In fact I said no such thing. I am refering to the Christian bigots that have infested our party. Not Christian Republicans.
You all know exactly what I’m talking about. Look at the flack AP takes for being an atheist.
I see my posts get under your skin enough that you need to constantly try to mis-characterize or spin them in a way that looks to marginalize the anti extremism you deal in.
Until a time I’m banned you can rest assured your silly taunts will do nothing but encourage me.
barkolounger on March 24, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Was everyone here able to find it at their Barnes and Noble?
therightwinger on March 24, 2009 at 7:12 PM
I just called my local Barnes and Noble. They said the got ten copies and sold them all in the first hour. They expect more in within the week.
Vntnrse on March 24, 2009 at 7:13 PM
amerpundit:
I don’t think most Americans support the concept of gay marriage, but I don’t think they want a Constitutional amendment banning it either. And as for Reagan, I do not remember gay marriage even being an issue back then.
And Reagan did not get everything done he wanted either. He did not shut down the Department of Ed like he said he would. He was forced to raise social security taxes. Reagan was a religious man, but he was not in your face about his religion.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:14 PM
I like Beck. :) And Alex Jones. :) And Mark Levin. :) And getalife. :)
True_King on March 24, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Look. This country needs a smack in the face as it concerns entitlement programs. Say what you want about Medicare being self-paid. Like SS, it is broke and unsustainable. People would have been better off buying an insurance policy with the money they paid into Medicare. Same with SS. Until someone can make people understand that fact, nothing changes. In a way, Obama may be a blessing in disguise in that as he fails miserably and when your grandchildren have to rebuild this country, the Obama experiment/experience will forever chill people to socialism and big government.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Well, I’d watch but they won’t let us vote him off the Island this week so… This is all just a long episode of “Punked” right?
petunia on March 24, 2009 at 7:16 PM
Same thing is going on with Atlas Shrugged. It’s sold out everywhere and there’s 1 to 2 week wait at Amazon.
Knucklehead on March 24, 2009 at 7:18 PM
He is a part of the New World Order cabal. Everyone here needs to understand who these people are in order to understand the underlying agenda of Obama, they are one and the same. Why do you think he and Hillary attended the Bilderberg shindig in 2008 when they both disappeared and were supposedly in a secret meeting to make amends.
True_King on March 24, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Allah–Levine streams 24 hours on his website-marklevineshow.com so no excuses.
My amazon orders cannot ship because they are out of stock!
Love love Mark Levine. Bought the audio too, so I can listen on my ipod.
Buckeye Babe on March 24, 2009 at 7:20 PM
I look forward to buying his book.
chunderroad on March 24, 2009 at 7:20 PM
genso:
A blessing in disguise? You do not understand what I said. I said that the drug prescription plan and plans like it are the only thing stopping national health care. If those people do not take their meds and they get sick, Medicare has to take care of them. It is cheaper to keep them on their meds.
And as for drunken sailors and all that, Reagan had deficits and conservatives loved him. In fact he spent a larger part of GDP on deficits than Bush did as an average. He rasied social security taxes rather than try and reform the system.
And when Bush did try to reform the system, with the support of McCain you could have heard crickets chirping on the right. The support was subdued to say the least.
And I am not talking about politicos, I am talking about the people themselves.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:21 PM
Nope, barfalounger, you don’t get under my skin, my vaccinations are current. You only infect third world nations.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Reagan pushed an amendment for organized prayer in public schools. He wanted a constitutional amendment to ban all abortion except when the mother’s life is at risk. His quotes from ’80 and ’81 respectively:
He wasn’t exactly hiding it from the public view.
amerpundit on March 24, 2009 at 7:23 PM
Hey, you can laugh at those moderate Republicans, but people like Lugar have been around for a long long time. If not for them the party would not stand a chance at winning a national election. Like it or not.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM
amerpundit:
Reagan let believe as they chose to believe, he did not dictate to people. That is what I meant. I realize he was religious, but secular people felt comfortable for him.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Terrye, I’m trying to be good, but Lugar?
You have to stand on principles, not bend over to show the peeps that you can ‘reach across the aisle’.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM
I’m a fiscal Con/ social moderate to Libertarian…
Explain to me why I should support a Social Con, Fiscaly LIBERAL republican party?
The Repubs and Dems in Washington are arguing over WHAT they will tell us to do, NOT whether they should be telling us what to do or not.
That 80+ Repubs voted for a clearly unconstitutional Law which was a blatant bill of attainder… tells me all I need to know about whether I should support the current Repbulican party.
I voted for Bush twice because of the “if you don’t vote Repub you are helping a Dem” arguement… and it brought me a choice between Obama and McCain…
Insanity, doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result…
I mean come on… the Repubs in Congress called out CHENEY today… wow…. stuck on stupid.
Romeo13 on March 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM
a cornucopia of mental disorders.
careful what you wish for:
sesquipedalian on March 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM
Terrye, I understand what you are saying. It is the problem with our political and social cultures. You can prop these programs up for a little longer but, ultimately, they will fail and people will suffer. That failure might have been 20 years in the future. Now, with the Fed printing so much money and the debt ballooning, the failure will come in 5-10 years. It will be a tough lesson for everyone unprepared for it, just like this current crisis.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM
Levine sounds like Graucho Marx. Can’t stand the sound of his voice, although I do agree with much of what he says.
Borislav on March 24, 2009 at 7:28 PM
HornetSting:
I live in Indiana. Lugar has been a Senator from this state for years. He used to be the mayor of Indianapolis. The Republicans of this state like and support him, that is why he keeps winning. He is not stealing elections.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM
You, my friend, are the new face of the conservative party…whatever they want to call it.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM
But your so mean to the liberals, Why?
……..because there trying to destroy my country!!
Watch?…..Ya think?
try again later on March 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM
Getalife,
Here’s the spoiler from TOTUS of Barack’s press conference tonight, in what he calls the Readers Digest Version:
“Good evening. My fellow Americans, we’re screwed.”
Here’s the opening statement in it’s entirety, also courtesy of TOTUS…
Now you don’t have to watch.
You’re welcome!
Buy Danish on March 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM
Romeo:
Then do not complain about Obama.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM
Free speech, too?
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:31 PM
You see this is the thing, if conservatives really want to take over the party and rebuild it along some pure notions of conservatism, then they can do it. No one is stopping them. All they have to do is run people and win elections. Instead they constantly complain about the people who do win elections. As if it is everyone else’s job to give them what they want.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:31 PM
genso:
Fine, then just complain. Like my 6 year old step grandson.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:32 PM
Oh, terrye, I didn’t mean that he was stealing elections. I have nothing to say, we have Bangaman, who single-handedly wants to bring back the fairness doctrine. But, we will agree to disagree that people like Lugar, Mccain, Graham, snowe, collins, and specter are not the people that we want representing the republican party.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 7:33 PM
Have fun. I’ll be watching something that’s actually educational, as Turner Classic Movies is showing a 1996 documentary about Warner Brothers animator Chuck Jones-followed by a marathon of his best Looney Toons. Followed by the movie he worked on, “Phantom Tollbooth”.
Great stuff all.
Del Dolemonte on March 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM
I FINALLY heard someone say it on TV.
Levin:
“…This is the USA, …What the hell is going on here?!!!!…
Nelsa on March 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM
I’m going to my local crucnhy-granola latte-liberal bookshop tomorrow and ask for it. I thoroughly enjoyed buying Rick Santorum’s book there. It flummoxes the owner that I am supporting a local business and avoiding the big-box store, while also supporting conservative authors.
rockmom on March 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Lugar? Are you kidding me? You don’t think we can win without the likes of him?
He’s an example of why we can’t win. Wow is all I can say. Until we rid the party of these “lets all play patty cake across the aisle” we will continue to lose national elections.
You either don’t “get it” or really are just another RHINO.
Knucklehead on March 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Get off the phone you big dope!
perroviejo on March 24, 2009 at 7:35 PM
HornetSting:
I understand your point. I am just saying that these are the guys who are representing the party for a reason, they can win. The people who vote, vote for them. If people want to get rid of any of them, then run someone in the primary.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:35 PM
I’m an advocate of wiring all politicians to a lie-detector with 20,000 volts anytime they are out campaigning or conducting the business for which they were elected. Honesty should be the first qualification for office.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:35 PM
genso:
Yeah sure.
No wonder Obama is president.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:36 PM
Mark Levin is awesome! I’d say more but I’m listening to Mark Levin.
FloatingRock on March 24, 2009 at 7:36 PM
I’ll sleep more soundly tonight knowing that…mommy letting you stay up late on a school night? Over time pay from DNC?
jwp1964 on March 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Levin is by far the best of the conservative talkers – I love his schtick (being so mean to the stoopid libs that call in, clueless and stuttering) and I agree with him 100% of the time. I will buy his book this weekend – this guy is one smart keeper for the conservative rebound.
Ris4victory on March 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Wow…nice step-grandparenting skills. Make a better argument.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Knucklehead:
If we can win without the likes of Lugar, then do it. I would vote for a strong conservative. I voted for Hostettler here in the 8th district. He was very conservative, the blue dog Ellsworth beat him bad. That was depressing.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Oh… so now you wish to take away my Freedom of Speech?
Because I don’t blindly follow YOUR party?
A Plague on both your houses….
I calls em as I sees em… and NEITHER party is even CLOSE to my political philosophy…
But then people like YOU will tell me not to speak?
Good thing I spent those years protecting my OWN freedom of Speech in the Military… as folks like you would like to shut me up.
Romeo13 on March 24, 2009 at 7:39 PM
Del Dolemonte on March 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM
I’ve seen it. It’s very good. And this is a Radio, TV, and film Major telling you this.
Terrye, the thing Conservatives feel about the Moderate Republicans is a sense of betrayal. In several instances, especially in the last several years, they tend to vote with the Democrats. They are then viewed as sell-outs who are trying to get along for the spotlight’s sake (like Meghan McCain). It’s like most of our parents told us, “if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.
kingsjester on March 24, 2009 at 7:39 PM
genso:
I don’t have to make a better argument. If you do not want to support or vote for anyone and would rather just complain about whoever runs, whatever party he is, fine.
I understand what you mean. Here in Indiana Barack Obama pulled off an upset in the last election because a few thousand people voted for Barr. They knew he could not win. They knew it would help Obama, but they made their choice. fine.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM
kingjester:
The thing a lot of moderates feel about conservatives is a sense of betrayal too.
I have been voting a straight R ticket for some time.
But in the last few years, I watched Bush trying to fight a war in the face of strong opposition from Democrats and it seemed to me that a lot of conservatives were willing to stab him in the back in spite of the war, in spite of everything.
So, I guess that the sense of disappointment and frustration probably works both ways.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM
Didn’t see an answer to this.
I believe he voted for McCain … considering the alternative. You can listen to his show by following the link from the sidebar on the main page (we don’t get him on the radio up here in the great white north).
gh on March 24, 2009 at 7:44 PM
and who cares about Meghan McCain? Who the hell is she? My God, Ronald Reagan’s son and Eisenhower’s grand daughter voted for Obama.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM
BD,
Teleprompter Vs. No Teleprompter: Letterman Takes On Obama Critics (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/24/teleprompter-vs-no-telepr_n_178474.html
Hilarious.
getalife on March 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM
gh:
I wondered because at one point he was threatening to sit it out.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM
This is what I am trying to convey to you. Things have changed and not for the better. Conservatives, and Republicans by extension, need an new message and moving left to compromise is not it. If anything, it is the reason we are in this mess to begin with, going all the way back to Ike.
genso on March 24, 2009 at 7:46 PM
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM
Conservatives I know got upset with him because he was not a Fiscal Conservative. They thought he spent too much and expanded government more than necessary. They supported him and our troops in the War on Terror.
kingsjester on March 24, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Romeo:
I am not taking away your freedom of speech. How could I? Say what you like.
And it is a good thing that moderate RINO McCain spent years in the service fighting for our freedoms too.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:48 PM
kingjester:
Like I said, a lot of those same conservatives did not have a problem with Reagan and his deficits. And Reagan was not fighting a war. And while Democrats definitely opposed Reagan, he never had to face the kind of vicious hateful resentment that Bush did.
No one is perfect.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:50 PM
I only started listening to him regularly last fall but I think he acknowledges making the threat although he says that he wasn’t really serious about it. He also acknowledges that Sarah made it a lot easier to vote for McCain, whose conservatism on many issues he does respect.
gh on March 24, 2009 at 7:51 PM
I can’t recall a single time when Letterman was hilarious, but I’ll try to watch it later if I get a chance, like maybe during TOTUS’ press conference.
Buy Danish on March 24, 2009 at 7:53 PM
So by your argument, just because they win is a reason to support them?
Lugar is another good reason for term limits. Our election in my town is in a couple of weeks. I’ve only lived here for 3 years and don’t see any progress with the idiots, so I’m voting for anyone who’s not an incumbent.
Throw all the bums out!!!!
Knucklehead on March 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM
genso:
I am not talking about moving left. Was Nixon an arch conservative? No. Did Reagan reign in the size of government and deal with entitlements? No. Was Bush1 conservative by the standards of some of the commenters here? No. Eisenhower was not conservative by their standards as far as that is concerned.
I am saying that a lot of the people who have been voting Republican for decades are not as conservative as someone like Levin. That does not mean Levin does not make sense a lot of the time, he does.
But the idea that the party is moving left with people like McCain ignores who has been in the party for years.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM
BD,
You won’t like it. It shows w without a teleprompter.
getalife on March 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM
Knucklehead:
No. I am saying that they win because people support them and if you want to get rid of them, then do it.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM
People like barkolounger, Meghan McCain, and Allah are the reason Conservatives need to leave the Republican Party. Apparently they aren’t going to leave and go full Democrat.
Vigilante on March 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM
That’s the plan in 2010, finally, BOTH McCain’s will be silenced, Terrye.
We lost our chance on Graham in 2008. I guess he hoodwinked enough people.
We can’t be dem lite anymore. It does not work.
HornetSting on March 24, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Hornet:
It is not about being Demlite, it is about being relevant.
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 8:04 PM
Vigilante:
So, who died and made you boss of the Party?
Terrye on March 24, 2009 at 8:04 PM
.
*Looks around sheepishly*
.
I’m the only person who laughed.
.
Sigh.
.
There’s something wrong with me.
BrideOfRove on March 24, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Just my opinion, like every other post on here.
Vigilante on March 24, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Shhhhhhhhh! Obama is speaking! He’s speaking! His teleprompter is answering tough tough questions.
.
“Mr.President. You were great on Leno. Seriously. I replayed it – like – a hundred times. How much does it suck that AIG sucks so much and how are you holding up?”
.
Uhhhh. Yeah. Uhhhh. Hmmmmmm. You know? It’s time these people got the message that they can’t keep making money hand over fist when the rest of the world – I mean country – ignore that uhhhhh that world slip – uhhhh what did I say? Next question.
BrideOfRove on March 24, 2009 at 8:14 PM
After Michelle’s and Rush’s recommendations, I decided to go out and pick up a copy instead of listening to Zero’s press conference.
I found it at the third store I tried (a Target Supercenter). And they were down to two copies after I picked up mine.
The guy at the Barnes & Noble (my first stop) said that he had heard it was sold out at all of their locations already.
This is promising!
I’ll crack it open tonight while I sip a glass of pinot grigio.
jennifernaz on March 24, 2009 at 8:14 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »