Animal sex mating. Animal sex videos. Animal sex stories free. Free animal sex pics. Animal sex….

Regulated by who?

The Idiots who signed the Stim bill WITHOUT reading it?

Now in order to get and keep the people who can run a billion dollar company they have to bonus them.

So a guy who would have made 1.5 million still makes 1.5 million — $500K salary and $1 million retention. Once again the government makes a mess then blames everyone else so they can ride in on a white elephant — or a black savior and fix it.

This s.o.b. needs to be in jail, not running the damn Treasury.

johnnyU on March 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM

Ditto Dodd, Frank and Rangel

Which again begs the question: just what has Tim Geithner been doing with his time at Treasury?

What do the secretaries and clerks in his office look like and can they type?

if I was a con, I would look at Newt for leadership.

getalife on March 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM

If you were a con, I’d slit my throat.

As for Newt, who wants to follow a guy who had 84 ethics violations filed against him when he was in Congress? That only makes him suitable for leadership in your party.

MB4 on March 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM

+1

still waiting your link that says otherwise.

oh and my apology.

As to implementing wage guidelines for executives this is none of the Governments business.

chemman on March 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM

If these “executives” are sucking at the taxpayers and kids and grandkids “teat” like a vacuum cleaner then it sure is.

This is getting very tiresome that profits are privatized and loses are socialized for the favored.

These AIG “executives” and other AIG employees are for all $$$$$$$$$$ intents and purposes government employees, arguably more like welfare queen wards of the state, so why should they get paid like big capitalists?

Given a choice between trying, as best as possible, to correct a big mistake and compounding it, I go with trying to, as best as possible, with trying to correct as much as possible of it.

It really bizarre to me that there is so much defense of socialism and welfare queens in the name of capitalism.

The argument is if you think the gop are not involved in this disaster you are not being honest and I proved that fact.

Chuck is not man enough to admit it but I think if I was a con, I would look at Newt for leadership.

chemman on March 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Than you but I disagree with Newt on letting it fail, have a depression and bounce back.

That is Hoover thinking.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-213

Its the Bush Obama plan and Newt was man enough to admit it.

The Geithner plan: Still a contradictory bag of slogans

When you come to a fork in the road, take it.
- Yogi Berra

Show me some proof the GOP put the bonus protection in the stimulus specifically for AIG. Jeez all but 3 of them voted against the thing.

Chuck Schick on March 22, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Again, I only engage with those who will be honest.

getalife on March 22, 2009 at 1:33 PM

Now I’ve been honest, how about answering Chuck Schicks question.

Which part of the Tarp 1 vote did you not undertand?

Why is Newt calling it the Bush Obama plan and blames both parties?

So, waiting on your apology for lying.

I asked for proof the gop WAS involved.

Looking forward to your apology.

Nuff said.

Watched it on CNN and yes he admitted both parties are to blame.